Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anterior quadratus lumborum block for analgesia after living-donor renal transplantation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Limited non-opioid analgesic options are available for managing postoperative pain after renal transplantation. We aimed to investigate whether the unilateral anterior quadratus lumborum (QL) block would reduce postoperative opioid consumption after living-donor renal transplantation in the context of multimodal analgesia.

METHODS

Eighty-eight adult patients undergoing living-donor renal transplantation were randomly allocated to receive the unilateral anterior QL block (30 mL of ropivacaine 0.375%) or sham block (normal saline) on the operated side before emergence from anesthesia. All patients received standard multimodal analgesia, including the scheduled administration of acetaminophen and fentanyl via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was the total opioid consumption during the first 24 hours after transplantation. The secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first opioid administration, cutaneous distribution of sensory blockade, motor weakness, nausea/vomiting, quality of recovery scores, time to first ambulation, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The total opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after transplantation did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups (median (IQR), 160.5 (78-249.8) vs 187.5 (93-309) oral morphine milligram equivalent; median difference (95% CI), -27 (-78 to 24), p=0.29). No differences were observed in the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The anterior QL block did not reduce opioid consumption in patients receiving multimodal analgesia after living-donor renal transplantation. Our findings do not support the routine administration of the anterior QL block in this surgical population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04908761.

Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Total hip Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent literature regarding regional anesthesia (RA) techniques and outcomes for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the face of changing surgical techniques and perioperative considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Based on large meta-analyses, peripheral nerve blocks are indicated for THA. Each block has its own risks and benefits and data for outcomes for particular techniques are limited. New surgical techniques, improved use of multimodal analgesia, and improved ultrasound guided regional anesthetics lead to better pain control for patients undergoing THA with less associated risks. Block selection continues to be influenced by provider comfort, surgical approach, patient anatomy, and postoperative goals. Head-to-head studies of particular nerve blocks are warranted.

Ambulatory total hip and knee arthroplasty: a literature review and perioperative considerations

PURPOSE

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA), particularly for the hip and knee, is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. The advancement/evolution of surgical and anesthesia techniques have allowed TJA to be performed on an ambulatory/same-day discharge basis. In this Continuing Professional Development module, we synthesize the perioperative evidence that may aid the development of successful ambulatory TJA pathways.

SOURCE

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for ambulatory or fast-track TJA articles. In the absence of direct evidence for the ambulatory setting, we extrapolated the evidence from the in-patient TJA literature.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Patient selection encompassing patient, medical, and social factors is fundamental for successful same-day discharge of patients following TJA. Evidence for the type of intraoperative anesthesia favours neuraxial technique for achieving same day discharge criteria and reduced perioperative complications. Availability of short-acting local anesthetic for neuraxial anesthesia would affect the anesthetic choice. Nonetheless, modern general anesthesia with multimodal analgesia and antithrombotics in a well selected population can be considered. Regional analgesia forms an integral part of the multimodal analgesia regime to reduce opioid consumption and facilitate same-day hospital discharge, reducing hospital readmission. For ambulatory total knee arthroplasty, a combination of adductor canal block with local anesthetic periarticular infiltration provided is a suitable regional analgesic regimen.

CONCLUSION

Anesthesia for TJA has evolved as such that same-day discharge will become the norm for selected patients. It is essential to establish pathways for early discharge to prevent adverse effects and readmission in this population. As more data are generated from an increased volume of ambulatory TJA, more robust evidence will emerge for the ideal anesthetic components to optimize outcomes.

Regional anaesthesia for postoperative pain management following laparoscopic, visceral, non-oncological surgery a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management following laparoscopic, non-oncological visceral surgery in adults is challenging. Regional anaesthesia could be a promising component in multimodal pain management.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with GRADE assessment. Primary outcomes were postoperative acute pain intensity at rest/during movement after 24 h, the number of patients with block-related adverse events and the number of patients with postoperative paralytic ileus.

RESULTS

82 trials were included. Peripheral regional anaesthesia combined with general anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia may result in a slight reduction of pain intensity at rest at 24 h (mean difference (MD) - 0.72 points; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.91 to - 0.54; I2 = 97%; low-certainty evidence), which was not clinically relevant. The evidence is very uncertain regarding the effect on pain intensity during activity at 24 h (MD -0.8 points; 95%CI - 1.17 to - 0.42; I2 = 99%; very low-certainty evidence) and on the incidence of block-related adverse events. In contrast, neuraxial regional analgesia combined with general anaesthesia (versus general anaesthesia) may reduce postoperative pain intensity at rest in a clinical relevant matter (MD - 1.19 points; 95%CI - 1.99 to - 0.39; I2 = 97%; low-certainty evidence), but the effect is uncertain during activity (MD - 1.13 points; 95%CI - 2.31 to 0.06; I2 = 95%; very low-certainty evidence). There is uncertain evidence, that neuraxial regional analgesia combined with general anaesthesia (versus general anaesthesia) increases the risk for block-related adverse events (relative risk (RR) 5.11; 95%CI 1.13 to 23.03; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms that regional anaesthesia might be an important part of multimodal postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic visceral surgery, e.g. in patients at risk for severe postoperative pain, and with large differences between surgical procedures and settings. Further research is required to evaluate the use of adjuvants and the additional benefit of regional anaesthesia in ERAS programmes.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021258281.

Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block and erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) surgery is a common surgical procedure, and ultrasound guided interfascial plane blocks can also be included in current approaches to postoperative multimodal analgesia regimens. This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and transversalis fascia plane block (TFPB) in patients undergoing OIHR.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded comparative study was conducted in the postoperative recovery room and ward of a tertiary hospital. A total of 80 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III were enrolled and allocated equally to either the ESPB or TFPB group. The patients received standard multimodal analgesia in addition to an ultrasound-guided ESPB or TFPB. During the first 24 h postoperatively, tramadol consumption was assessed and pain levels at rest and during movement were compared using numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

The results showed no difference in NRS scores at any time point between the groups, except for NRS at rest in the third hour. However, tramadol consumption was lower in the TFPB group than in the ESPB group overall (88 ± 75.2 vs. 131 ± 93.7 mg, respectively; P = 0.027, mean difference: -43, 95% CI [-80.82, -5.18]).

CONCLUSIONS

The TFPB leads to lower tramadol requirements in the first 24 h postoperatively than the ESPB in patients undergoing OIHR.

[Old and New Regional Anesthesia Procedures Under Review - Abdomen to Toe]

Ultrasound (US) technology has significantly expanded the spectrum of regional anesthesiological procedures in recent years. Abdominal wall blocks are becoming an increasingly integral part of a multimodal postoperative pain concept after abdominal surgery, gynecological or urological interventions. Thoracic epidural analgesia remains the gold standard for extensive surgery. The requirement for rapid postoperative mobilization and discharge after lower extremity surgery has led to the abandonment of neuroaxial or plexus blocks in favor of selective, peripheral blocks such as the PENG block or adductor canal block. The following article is intended to show the reader the change in the use of regional anesthesiological procedures for abdominal wall and lower extremity blocks using selected blockages.

Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians-A Narrative Review

Multi-modal analgesic strategies, including regional anesthesia techniques, have been shown to contribute to a reduction in the use of opioids and associated side effects in the perioperative setting. Consequently, those so-called multi-modal approaches are recommended and have become the state of the art in perioperative medicine. In the majority of intensive care units (ICUs), however, mono-modal opioid-based analgesic strategies are still the standard of care. The evidence guiding the application of regional anesthesia in the ICU is scarce because possible complications, especially associated with neuraxial regional anesthesia techniques, are often feared in critically ill patients. However, chest and abdominal wall analgesia in particular is often insufficiently treated by opioid-based analgesic regimes. This review summarizes the available evidence and gives recommendations for peripheral regional analgesia approaches as valuable complements in the repertoire of intensive care physicians' analgesic portfolios.

Quadratus Lumborum Block for Ovarian Cystectomy Surgery in a Patient With Severe Kyphoscoliosis

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has been described as a regional analgesic technique in various abdominal surgeries. We present a case report of a high-risk patient who underwent ovarian cystectomy with QLB and deep sedation after failed neuraxial anesthesia. A 29-year-old female patient with comorbidities osteogenesis imperfecta, severe kyphoscoliosis with restrictive lung disease, and cervical syringomyelia with cranio-cervical junction stenosis (C2/C3). The patient had large ovarian cysts with associated dyspnea. She accepted surgery-an open bilateral ovarian cystectomy-despite being advised that general anesthesia would be high-risk. Regional anesthetic options were limited and challenging, given her anatomy and difficulty in positioning. Neuraxial anesthesia was attempted but was unsuccessful. The patient safely underwent surgery (lower midline laparotomy) using QLB. This clinically challenging case demonstrates the feasibility of QLB as the mainstay multimodal anesthetic approach (without general and neuraxial anesthesia) for abdominal surgery under exceptional circumstances.

Quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic nephrectomy: a meta-analysis

Aim: To study the efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) in laparoscopic nephrectomy patients. Materials & methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for QLB and/or TAP technique compared with each other or a control. Results: Direct analysis of 24 h post-op pain score at rest for each compared with control showed significant reduction, QLB (mean differences [MD] [95% CI]: -1.12 [-1.87,-0.36]; p = 0.004) and TAP (MD [95% CI]: -0.36 [-0.59, -0.12]; p = 0.003). With movement both were respectively lower than control QLB (MD [95% CI]: -1.12 [-1.51, -0.72]; p = <0.0001) and TAP (MD [95% CI]: -0.50 [-0.95, -0.05]; p = 0.03). Moreover, QLB demonstrated less risk 24 h of post-op nausea vomiting (PONV) versus control (PONV; risk ratios [RR] [95% CI]: 0.64 [0.45,0.90]; p = 0.01). Conclusion: TAP and QLB reduce pain scores compared with control, whereas only QLB reduces PONV compared with control.

Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of quadratus lumborum nerve blocks (QLB) for pain control following elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased substantially in recent years. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare outcomes from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) utilising QLBs following elective THA.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for RCTs perioperative QLBs for THA. Quantitative synthesis was conducted for pain scores, opioid consumption and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 7 RCTs with 429 patients undergoing THA were included. No differences in pain scores were demonstrated between QLBs and control interventions. Subgroup analysis demonstrated no differences between QLBs and sham procedures or active comparators. No differences in postoperative opioid consumption between QLB and control interventions was found. In trials reporting adverse events, they were rare and similar between groups. Overall, the certainty of the evidence was graded as low or very low.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature suggests that a QLB for THA does not reduce pain or opioid consumption compared to sham or active comparators.

Effect of interfascial pressure on block success during anterior quadratus lumborum block application: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has recently been used frequently for postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pressure changes between the middle thoracolumbar fascia layers to which the anterior QLB (aQLB) is applied at the level of the sensory block.

METHODS

A total of 67 patients planned to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were evaluated in the context of this prospective study. Bilateral aQLBs were administered to all patients, and a peripheral nerve block catheter was placed between the psoas and quadratus lumborum muscles. The correlation of interfascial pressures (IFPs) during block application, 30 min intraoperatively, and 30 min postoperatively with the sensory block level was determined as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were the sensory block levels 30 min after block application and 30 min postoperatively; visual analog scale scores 30 min and 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively; and 24 h tramadol consumption.

RESULTS

The preoperatively and intraoperatively measured IFPs differed significantly between the right and left sides (P < 0.05). The preoperative and postoperative block levels also differed significantly between the right and left sides (P < 0.05). The preoperative and postoperative block levels and preoperatively measured IFPs showed a weakly negative correlation (right: r = 0.374; left: r = 0.470).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that pressure changes between the fasciae may be effective in aQLB application.

Regional Anesthesia for Thoracic and Abdominal Surgery: Tips and Tricks for the Surgeon

The use of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) has flourished over the past two decades with the description of many novel techniques and the incorporation of UGRA into patient care pathways for many types of surgery, including thoracic and abdominal surgery. Numerous facial plane blocks have been developed for analgesia of the chest and abdomen. Though analgesic efficacy varies based on the specific technique, it is important to be aware of the regional anesthesia techniques in common usage, their analgesic distributions, side effect profiles, and efficacy. In this review, we describe fascial plane blocks developed since 2010 as well as older regional anesthesia techniques and provide context for how and why they might be incorporated into patient care pathways. We will provide salient details on block coverage and briefly discuss evidence and relevant controversies around their use.

Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects between Ultrasound-Guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Patients: A Randomized, Controlled, and Noninferiority Study

Background

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, noninferiority study aimed to compare the effects of analgesia and recovery between transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TMQLB) and paravertebral block (PVB).

Methods

Sixty-eight, American Society of Anesthesiologists level I-III patients, who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were randomly allocated to either TMQLB or PVB group (independent variable) in a 1 : 1 ratio. The TMQLB and PVB groups received corresponding regional anesthesia preoperatively with 0.4 ml/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine and follow-up at postoperative 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours. The participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. We hypothesized that the primary outcome, postoperative 48-hour cumulative morphine consumption, in the TMQLB group was not more than 50% of that in the PVB group. Secondary outcomes including pain numerical rating scales (NRS) and postoperative recovery data were dependent variables.

Results

Thirty patients in each group completed the study. The postoperative 48-hour cumulative morphine consumption was 10.60 ± 5.28 mg in the TMQLB group and 6.40 ± 3.40 mg in the PVB group. The ratio (TMQLB versus PVB) of postoperative 48-hour morphine consumption was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.13-1.48), indicating a noninferior analgesic effect of TMQLB to PVB. The sensory block range was wider in the TMQLB group than in the PVB group (difference 2 dermatomes, 95% CI 1 to 4 dermatomes, P=0.004). The intraoperative analgesic dose was higher in the TMQLB group than in the PVB group (difference 32 µg, 95% CI: 3-62 µg, P=0.03). The postoperative pain NRS at rest and on movement, incidences of side effects, anesthesia-related satisfaction, and quality of recovery scores were similar between the two groups (all P  >  0.05).

Conclusions

The postoperative 48-hour analgesic effect of TMQLB was noninferior to that of PVB in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. This trial is registered with NCT03975296.

Analgesic Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum Block in Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in adults undergoing nephrectomy.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients

Adult patients (≥18 years of age) received nephrectomy under general anesthesia.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science on January 10, 2022, including randomized controlled trials that evaluated the analgesic efficacy of QLB for patients undergoing nephrectomy.

Results

A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (N = 821 patients) were included in the study. Compared with the non-block, single-shot QLB reduced postoperative opioid consumption (mean difference [MD], −8.37 mg intravenous morphine equivalent; 95% confidence interval [CI], −12.19 to −4.54 mg) and pain scores at 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours at rest and during movement after nephrectomy. Single-shot QLB also prolonged the time to first analgesic request (MD, 6.44 hours; 95% CI, 2.23 to 10.65 hours), shortened the length of hospital stay (MD, −0.32 day; 95% CI, −0.55 to −0.09 day), and decreased the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.65). Compared with continuous epidural anesthesia, repeated QLB could provide comparable postoperative analgesic benefits.

Conclusions

Single-shot QLB provided a statistically significant but clinically small improvement in postoperative analgesia and recovery for patients undergoing nephrectomy. The QLB would be beneficial as part of multimodal analgesia. Future research might need to determine which approach of QLB is superior for postoperative analgesia after nephrectomy.

Erector Spinae Plane Block Decreases Chronic Postoperative Pain Severity in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Up to 56% of patients develop chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). CPSP can affect patients’ moods and decrease daily activities. The primary aim of this study was to investigate CPSP severity in patients following off-pump (OP) CABG using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This was a prospective cohort study conducted in a cardiac surgery department of a teaching hospital. Patients undergoing OP-CABG were enrolled in an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group (n = 27) or a control (CON) group (n = 24). Before the induction of general anesthesia, ESPB was performed on both sides under ultrasound guidance using 0.375% ropivacaine. The secondary outcomes included cumulative oxycodone consumption, acute pain intensity, mechanical ventilation time, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. CPSP intensity was lower in the ESPB group than in the CON group 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery (p < 0.001). Significant between-group differences were also observed in other outcomes, including postoperative pain severity, opioid consumption, mechanical ventilation time, and hospital length of stay, in favor of the ESPB group. Preemptive ESPB appears to decrease the risk of CPSP development in patients undergoing OP-CABG. Reduced acute pain severity and shorter mechanical ventilation times and hospital stays should improve patients’ satisfaction and reduce perioperative complications.

Evaluation of Sensory Loss and Postoperative Analgesia Obtained by Diaphragmatic Apposition Zone Block Under Direct Laparoscopic Visualization in Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy: A Descriptive Study

Purpose

Local anesthetics can spread into the subendothoracic fascia compartment via the arcuate ligament and apposition zone of the diaphragm after the anterior quadratus lumborum blocks. Therefore, a new block may be achieved if local anesthetic is administered into the diaphragmatic apposition zone (DAZ) under direct laparoscopic visualization by surgeons. Therefore, we evaluated the sensory loss and postoperative analgesic efficacy of this new block in patients receiving laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Methods

A total of 28 patients scheduled to receive elective laparoscopic nephrectomy under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study. The DAZ blocks were performed in patients under direct laparoscopic visualization with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine before the dissected kidneys or renal tumors were taken out from the incision. All patients received the intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after surgery. The dermatomes of sensory loss and the muscle weakness of quadriceps femoris were assessed at 2 h post-surgery in the wards. The postoperative pain was scored. The opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery was recorded.

Results

The average number of dermatomes of sensory block was 8.6 ± 1.2. The highest level of sensory loss was T6 (T5-T6) [median (interquartile range, IQR)], and the lowest level of sensory block was L1 (L1–L2). The postoperative pain scores at rest or on movement at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h were kept at the low levels (less than 4). The muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris evaluated was 5 (5–5) points [median (IQR)]. Total dose of intravenous morphine equivalent consumption in the first 24 h after surgery was 21.2 ± 4.1 mg.

Conclusion

The DAZ block manifests a wide dermatomal coverage of sensory loss and is associated with the low levels of postoperative pain intensity and opioid use. It provides a new postoperative analgesia option for patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy.

The Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block (via transmuscular or posterior approach) After Hip Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

BACKGROUND

No review or meta-analysis exists elucidate the efficacy and safety of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) on the pain intensity, opioid requirement, and mobilization in patients undergoing hip surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was designed to compare QLB with no block or placebo (without other nerve/plexus blocks) for patients undergoing hip surgery.

METHODS

Two individual researchers conducted the platform searches on the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception to 12 June 2021. Only English publications were included. The rest pain score at 12 postoperative hours was designated as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included rest pain score at 6 and 24 postoperative hours, dynamic pain score at 6, 12, and 24 postoperative hours, total opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Seven trials including 514 patients were included. When compared with controls, the QLB technique significantly reduced rest pain scores at 12 hours after surgery (mean difference -1.15, -1.52 to -0.77, P<0.0001). The secondary outcomes were limited by heterogeneity: secondary pain outcomes and opioid consumption were consistently improved with QLB (P<0.05); patient satisfaction and postoperative nausea and vomiting were similar between the groups based on the Inverse variance heterogeneity model (P>0.05). The overall quality of evidence was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate evidence that QLB employment in hip surgery produces significant reduction in pain scores and opioid consumption within 24 hours. QLB appears to be an appropriate option for postoperative analgesia after hip surgery.

Current approaches to acute postoperative pain management after major abdominal surgery: a narrative review and future directions

Poorly controlled postoperative pain is associated with increased morbidity, negatively affects quality of life and functional recovery, and is a risk factor for persistent pain and longer-term opioid use. Up to 10% of opioid-naïve patients have persistent opioid use after many types of surgeries. Opioid-related side-effects and the opioid abuse epidemic emphasise the need for alternative, opioid-minimising, multimodal analgesic strategies, including neuraxial (epidural/intrathecal) techniques, truncal nerve blocks, and lidocaine infusions. The preference for minimally invasive surgical techniques has changed anaesthetic and analgesic requirements in abdominal surgery compared with open laparotomy, leading to a decline in popularity of epidural anaesthesia and an increasing interest in intrathecal morphine and truncal nerve blocks. Limited research exists on patient quality of recovery using specific analgesic techniques after intra-abdominal surgery. Poorly controlled postoperative pain after major abdominal surgery should be a research priority as it affects patient-centred short-term and long-term outcomes (including quality of life scores, return to function measurements, disability-free survival) and has broad community health and economic implications.

Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block at the Lateral Supra-Arcuate Ligament versus Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Analgesia after Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Several studies have shown the effectiveness of trans-muscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB) in analgesia after cesarean delivery. However, the influence of anterior QLB at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (QLB-LSAL) in this surgery is unclear. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of bilateral TQLBs with bilateral QLBs-LSAL following cesarean delivery. Ninety-four parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled and randomly allocated to undergo either bilateral TQLBs or bilateral QLBs-LSAL with 0.375% of ropivacaine (20 mL each side) following cesarean delivery. Intravenous sufentanil was administered for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The primary outcome was postoperative sufentanil consumption during the initial 24 h post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included pain scores, time to the first PCA request, postoperative rescue analgesia, satisfaction scores, and nausea/vomiting events. Sufentanil consumption was significantly reduced in the QLB-LSAL group in the first 24 h compared with the TQLB group after surgery (29.4 ± 5.7 μg vs. 39.4 ± 9.6 μg, p < 0.001). In comparison with TQLB, the time to the first PCA request in the QLB-LSAL group was significantly longer (10.9 ± 4.1 h vs. 6.7 ± 1.8 h, p < 0.001). No differences were observed between two groups regarding pain scores, rescue analgesia after surgery, satisfaction scores, or nausea/vomiting incidence. The significant reduction in opioid consumption in the first 24 h and prolongation in time to first opioid demand in parturients receiving QLB-LSAL compared with TQLB suggest that the QLB-LSAL is a superior choice for multimodal analgesia after cesarean delivery.

Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Enhances the Quality of Recovery after Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has been used to reduce postoperative acute pain and opioid consumption. However, the efficacy of QLB on the quality of recovery (QoR) after gastrointestinal surgery has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of QLB to enhance the postoperative QoR in patients undergoing open gastrointestinal surgery.

Methods

Eighty-four patients undergoing open gastrointestinal surgery were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided QLB with either 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine or saline. The primary outcome was the QoR-15 score at 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and chronic pain.

Results

The global QoR-15 score at 24 h postoperatively was significantly higher in the QLB group than in the control group (mean difference: 16.9; 95% CI: 11.9–21.9). Additionally, the QoR-15 scores for five dimensions were significantly higher in the QLB group than in the control group. The cumulative oxycodone consumption was significantly lower in the QLB group during 0–6, 6–24, 0–24, 24–48, and 0–48 h postoperatively than in the control group. At rest or during coughing, the pain verbal rating scale scores were significantly lower at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery in the QLB group than in the control group. The incidence of postoperative nausea was significantly different between the groups, but postoperative vomiting was not.

Conclusion

Single-injection posteromedial QLB with ropivacaine enhanced the QoR at 48 h after surgery and improved analgesia during the early postoperative period in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

Ultrasound-Guided Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block for Acute Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

The quadratus lumborum block provides postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing abdominal surgery, although there are three common approaches to perform this block. The present meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB2) after surgery.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register were searched from inception to 26 August 2021 for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the analgesic efficacy of QLB2 vs control (placebo or no block). The primary outcomes were pain scores at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were morphine consumption at 24 h after surgery and the postoperative complications.

Results

The present meta-analysis included 14 studies conducted with a total of 1001 patients. In comparison to control group, the QLB2 group presented significantly lower rest pain scores at 6 h (SMD −0.59; 95% CI: −1.05, −0.12; p = 0.01, I² = 84%; GRADE = moderate), 12 h (SMD: –0.83; 95% CI: –1.47, –0.19; p = 0.01; I² = 88%; GRADE = low), and 24 h (SMD: –0.37; 95% CI: –0.71, –0.03; p = 0.03; I² = 80%; GRADE = moderate) after surgery. The dynamic pain scores were significantly reduced, compared to control, in the QLB2 group at 12 h (SMD: –0.93; 95% CI: –1.52, –0.33; p = 0.002; I² = 83%; GRADE = low) and 24 h (SMD: –0.52; 95% CI: –0.93, –0.11; p = 0.01; I² = 83%; GRADE = moderate) after surgery. In addition, the QLB2 group presented reduced postoperative opioid consumption at 24 h (SMD: –0.45; 95% CI: –0.86, –0.03; p = 0.03; I² = 78%; GRADE = moderate). The subgroup analyses revealed that the analgesic benefit of QLB2 did not persist beyond 24 h when the patients were under spinal anesthesia.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided QLB2 could provide effective analgesia for patients under general anesthesia by decreasing the intensity of pain and opioid requirement when used within 24 h after abdominal surgery.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy of ultrasound-guided single-shot quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in adults following total hip arthroplasty

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided single-shot quadratus lumborum block (QLB) for postoperative analgesia in adults following total hip arthroplasty (THA).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Perioperative period.

PATIENTS

Adult patients undergoing THA.

METHODS

Studies were identified by performing electronic searches in the following electronic databases, PubMed (Medline), Cochrane Central Registry of Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar. We sought studies in adult patients undergoing THA, comparing QLB with a control group (no block, sham block or any other ultrasound guided regional nerve blocks). A total of 774 patients from 10 studies (7 randomized controlled, one controlled clinical and two retrospective study) were included in this meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

The 24 hr opioid consumption was similar in both the groups [WMD -4.09; 95%CI (-9.00, 0.83); P = 0.10; I2 = 95%]. The pain scores at rest at 24 hr was significantly less in QLB group [WMD -0.62; 95% CI (-1.15, -0.10); P = 0.02; I2 = 75%].The difference in pain scores was not clinically significant. The pain scores on movement at 24 hours, time to first analgesic request and time to discharge from hospital were similar in both the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

QLB as part of multimodal analgesia did not result in any significant analgesic benefits in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty in terms of either postoperative opioid consumption or pain scores at rest and on movement. Overall, the level of certainty is low. Further, well-designed trials are required to verify the results.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO

CRD42021253425.

Anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament versus transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The analgesic efficacy of transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB) to decrease the need for opioid consumption after laparoscopic nephrectomy has been demonstrated in several studies. However, the effect of an anterior QLB approach at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (QLB-LSAL) in this surgical context is unclear. Here, we aimed to compare postoperative analgesic effects of the two block approaches in laparoscopic nephrectomy.

DESIGN

A single-center, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University-affiliated tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 106 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I-III scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic nephrectomy under general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to receive preoperative TQLB or QLB-LSAL with 0.5% ropivacaine (25 mL). Postoperatively, patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous sufentanil was administered.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption within the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, satisfaction scores, levels of sedation, and incidence of nausea or vomiting.

MAIN RESULTS

Patients who underwent preoperative QLB-LSAL used a significantly lower intravenous morphine equivalent dose than those who underwent preoperative TQLB within the initial 24 h after surgery (34.3 ± 6.3 mg vs 23.5 ± 3.2 mg, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in pain scores, satisfaction scores, sedation scores, or incidence of nausea or vomiting between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that, compared to TQLB, QLB-LSAL is a beneficial nerve block that can reduce postoperative opioid consumption, making it a potentially superior approach to achieve multimodal analgesia after laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Evaluation of analgesic effects and safety of quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Recent years have witnessed the rapid expansion of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) technique in laparoscopic surgeries. However, inconsistent conclusions from latest studies prompted us to conduct present study to evaluate comprehensively the effects of QLB in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2021 by us. Randomized controlled trials comparing QLB versus placebo or different block techniques were involved. Coprimary outcomes included number of patients requiring additional analgesia, opioids consumption and incidence of postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Data from 20 studies involving a total of 1,332 patients were acquired. Based on the current evidences, the results indicated that application of QLB was associated with less number of patients requiring additional analgesia (RR = 0.67, with 95% CI [0.49, 0.91]), reduced intraoperative opioid consumption (SMD - 0.97 with 95% CI [-1.48, -0.45]) and postoperative opioid consumption (SMD -19.12 with 95% CI [-34.83, -3.41]), and less incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.71, with 95% CI [0.58, 0.87]) compared to placebo. In addition, no significant intergroup (QLB vs different regional block techniques) differences were observed for most outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidences exhibited several superiorities of QLB for patients in laparoscopic surgeries. Differences between QLB and some other block techniques in analgesic effects and PONV controlling effects were not significant. However, it calls for more high-quality evidences with large samples and trials with consistent evaluation scales for pain evaluation to draw more reliable conclusions.

Mechanisms of action of fascial plane blocks: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) target the space between two fasciae, rather than discrete peripheral nerves. Despite their popularity, their mechanisms of action remain controversial, particularly for erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum blocks.

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review describes the scientific evidence underpinning proposed mechanisms of action, highlights existing knowledge gaps, and discusses implications for clinical practice and research.

FINDINGS

There are currently two plausible mechanisms of analgesia. The first is a local effect on nociceptors and neurons within the plane itself or within adjacent muscle and tissue compartments. Dispersion of local anesthetic occurs through bulk flow and diffusion, and the resulting conduction block is dictated by the mass of local anesthetic reaching these targets. The extent of spread, analgesia, and cutaneous sensory loss is variable and imperfectly correlated. Explanations include anatomical variation, factors governing fluid dispersion, and local anesthetic pharmacodynamics. The second is vascular absorption of local anesthetic and a systemic analgesic effect at distant sites. Direct evidence is presently lacking but preliminary data indicate that FPBs can produce transient elevations in plasma concentrations similar to intravenous lidocaine infusion. The relative contributions of these local and systemic effects remain uncertain.

CONCLUSION

Our current understanding of FPB mechanisms supports their demonstrated analgesic efficacy, but also highlights the unpredictability and variability that result from myriad factors at play. Potential strategies to improve efficacy include accurate deposition close to targets of interest, injections of sufficient volume to encourage physical spread by bulk flow, and manipulation of concentration to promote diffusion.

Fascial plane blocks: a narrative review of the literature

Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) are increasingly numerous and are often touted as effective solutions to many perioperative challenges facing anesthesiologists. As 'new' FPBs are being described, questions regarding their effectiveness remain unanswered as appropriate studies are lacking and publications are often limited to case discussions or technical reports. It is often unclear if newly named FPBs truly represent a novel intervention with new indications, or if these new publications describe mere ultrasound facilitated modifications of existing techniques. Here, we present broad concepts and potential mechanisms of FPB. In addition, we discuss major FPBs of (1) the extremities (2) the posterior torso and (3) the anterior torso. The characteristics, indications and a brief summary of the literature on these blocks is included. Finally, we provide an estimate of the overall level of evidence currently supporting individual approaches as FPBs continue to rapidly evolve.

Regional Anesthesia Abdominal Blocks and Local Infiltration After Cesarean Delivery: Review of Current Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we discuss surgical infiltration and various abdominal wall blocks, including transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and quadratus lumborum blocks, and review the literature on the evidence behind these approaches and analgesia for cesarean delivery (CD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Adequate pain management in the parturient following CD is important to facilitate early ambulation and neonatal care while also improving patient satisfaction and decreasing hospital length of stay. Neuraxial opioids have been a mainstay for postoperative analgesia; however, this option may not be available for patients undergoing emergency CD and have contraindications to neuraxial approaches, refusing an epidural or spinal, or with technical difficulties for neuraxial placement. In such cases, alternative options include a fascial plane block or surgical wound infiltration. The use of regional blocks or surgical wound infiltration is especially recommended in the parturient who does not receive neuraxial opioids for CD. Adequate postoperative analgesia following CD is an important component of the overall care of the parturient as it helps facilitate early mobilization and improve patient satisfaction. In conclusion, the use of abdominal fascial plane blocks or surgical wound infiltration is recommended in the parturient who does not receive neuraxial opioids for CD.

Comparison of the analgesic effect of quadratus lumborum block and epidural block in open uterine surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Effective regional analgesia during open surgery could reduce opioid consumption and enhance early recovery. We compared the effects of the newly developed quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and the traditional epidural block (EB) in open uterine surgery.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, we included patients scheduled for elective open uterine surgery during May - September 30, 2019. Patients received QLB or EB for perioperative pain relief before general anesthesia. Perioperative opioid consumption, and numeric rating scale (NRS: 0-10) pain scores after surgery, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), ephedrine and urapidil use during surgery, lower limb muscle strength, timing of first flatus and defecation, nausea, vomiting, and other complications within 24 h post-surgery, were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

Data of 72 (86%; 36/group) of 83 eligible patients were analyzed. Remifentanil consumption during surgery was higher in the QLB than in the EB group, while cumulative sufentanil consumption within 24 h post-surgery was similar between both groups. NRS pain scores at rest and during activity were higher at 1 h post-surgery, and MAP was higher at 5-, 15-, and 30-min postincision in the QLB than in the EB group; HR was similar between groups. Lower ephedrine requirements, higher lower limb muscle strength at 1 h post-surgery, and lower nausea incidence were observed in the QLB group.

CONCLUSIONS

QLB produces a less intense but longer block and fewer side effects in the first 24 h after open uterine surgery than those produced by EB.