Collagen Membrane Over Buccal Fat Pad Versus Buccal Fat Pad in Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Comparative Prospective Study

Piezoelectric and Dielectric Electrospun Fluoropolymer Membranes for Oral Mucosa Regeneration: A Comparative Study

Wound healing of the oral mucosa is an urgent problem in modern dental surgical practice. This research article presents and compares the findings of the investigations of the structural, physicochemical, and biological characteristics of two types of polymeric membranes used for the regeneration of oral mucosa. The membranes were prepared from poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) and a copolymer of vinylidene fluoride and tetrafluoroethylene (VDF-TeFE) and analyzed via scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, X-ray diffraction analysis, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Investigation results obtained indicate that both types of membranes are composed of thin fibers: (0.57 ± 0.25) μm for PTFE membranes and (0.43 ± 0.14) μm for VDF-TeFE membranes. Moreover, the fibers of VDF-TeFE membranes exhibit distinct piezoelectric properties, which are confirmed by piezoresponse force microscopy and X-ray diffraction. Both types of membranes are hydrophobic: (139.7 ± 2.5)° for PTFE membranes and (133.5 ± 2.0)° for VDF-TeFE membranes. In vitro assays verify that both membrane types did not affect the growth and division of mice fibroblasts of the 3T3-L1 cell line, with a cell viability in the range of 88-101%. Finally, in vivo comparative experiments carried out using Wistar rats demonstrate that the piezoelectric VDF-TeFE membranes have a high ability to regenerate oral mucosa.

Interventions for managing oral submucous fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) is a chronic disease of the oral cavity that causes progressive constriction of the cheeks and mouth accompanied by severe pain and reduced mouth opening. OSF has a significant impact on eating and swallowing, affecting quality of life. There is an increased risk of oral malignancy in people with OSF. The main risk factor for OSF is areca nut chewing, and the mainstay of treatment has been behavioural interventions to support habit cessation. This review is an update of a version last published in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of interventions for the management of oral submucous fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 5 September 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of OSF treated with systemic, locally delivered or topical drugs at any dosage, duration or delivery method compared against placebo or each other. We considered surgical procedures compared against other treatments or no active intervention. We also considered other interventions such as physiotherapy, ultrasound or alternative therapies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. participant-reported resumption of normal eating, chewing and speech; 2. change or improvement in maximal mouth opening (interincisal distance); 3. improvement in range of jaw movement; 4. change in severity of oral/mucosal burning pain/sensation; 5.

ADVERSE EFFECTS

Our secondary outcomes were 6. quality of life; 7. postoperative discomfort or pain as a result of the intervention; 8. participant satisfaction; 9. hospital admission; 10. direct costs of medication, hospital bed days and any associated inpatient costs for the surgical interventions. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 RCTs (2176 participants) in this updated review. We assessed one study at low risk of bias, five studies at unclear risk of bias and 24 studies at high risk of bias. We found diverse interventions, which we categorised according to putative mechanism of action. We present below our main findings for the comparison 'any intervention compared with placebo or no active treatment' (though most trials included habit cessation for all participants). Results for head-to-head comparisons of active interventions are presented in full in the main review. Any intervention versus placebo or no active treatment Participant-reported resumption of normal eating, chewing and speech No studies reported this outcome. Interincisal distance Antioxidants may increase mouth opening (indicated by interincisal distance (mm)) when measured at less than three months (mean difference (MD) 3.11 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 5.77; 2 studies, 520 participants; low-certainty evidence), and probably increase mouth opening slightly at three to six months (MD 8.83 mm, 95% CI 8.22 to 9.45; 3 studies, 620 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Antioxidants may make no difference to interincisal distance at six-month follow-up or greater (MD -1.41 mm, 95% CI -5.74 to 2.92; 1 study, 90 participants; low-certainty evidence). Pentoxifylline may increase mouth opening slightly (MD 1.80 mm, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.58; 1 study, 106 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, it should be noted that these results are all less than 10 mm, which could be considered the minimal change that is meaningful to someone with oral submucous fibrosis. The evidence was very uncertain for all other interventions compared to placebo or no active treatment (intralesional dexamethasone injections, pentoxifylline, hydrocortisone plus hyaluronidase, physiotherapy). Burning sensation Antioxidants probably reduce burning sensation visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at less than three months (MD -30.92 mm, 95% CI -31.57 to -30.27; 1 study, 400 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), at three to six months (MD -70.82 mm, 95% CI -94.39 to -47.25; 2 studies, 500 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and at more than six months (MD -27.60 mm, 95% CI -36.21 to -18.99; 1 study, 90 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence was very uncertain for the other interventions that were compared to placebo and measured burning sensation (intralesional dexamethasone, vasodilators). Adverse effects Fifteen studies reported adverse effects as an outcome. Six of these studies found no adverse effects. One study evaluating abdominal dermal fat graft reported serious adverse effects resulting in prolonged hospital stay for 3/30 participants. There were mild and transient general adverse effects to systemic drugs, such as dyspepsia, abdominal pain and bloating, gastritis and nausea, in studies evaluating vasodilators and antioxidants in particular.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found moderate-certainty evidence that antioxidants administered systemically probably improve mouth opening slightly at three to six months and improve burning sensation VAS scores up to and beyond six months. We found only low/very low-certainty evidence for all other comparisons and outcomes. There was insufficient evidence to make an informed judgement about potential adverse effects associated with any of these treatments. There was insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of the other interventions tested. High-quality, adequately powered intervention trials with a low risk of bias that compare biologically plausible treatments for OSF are needed. It is important that relevant participant-reported outcomes are evaluated.

Application of the Buccal Fat Pad in Oral Reconstruction: Covered With Collagen Membrane or Not?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of collagen membrane as biological dressing in protecting the covered buccal fat pad (BFP) from physical damage during postoperative healing phase in the reconstruction of oral soft tissue defect.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients undergoing oral defects reconstruction using BFP. The predictor variable was the application of collagen membrane or not. The primary outcome variable was the wound healing. Other variables considered included age, gender, pain score, time taken for epithelialization, defect size and site. Postoperative follow-up was done at 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year.

RESULTS

Thirty patients in Zhuhai People's Hospital were selected and randomly divided in 2 groups. Group I patients were reconstructed using BFP alone, whereas collagen membrane was used as a covering over BFP in group II patients. In group I, 4 patients developed dehiscence 1-week postoperative, and underwent Infection with food lodgment along with another 1 patient at 3-week follow-up, whereas none of the group II patients developed dehiscence or infection. Pain score was lesser in group II patients as compared to group I. Time taken for epithelialization was about 3 weeks in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined application of collagen membrane protects the covered BFP from masticatory physical damage and food lodgment, which reduces infection and graft loss. It is worthy of consideration as an effective method for the reconstruction of selected moderate-sized oral defects, especially in larger size or at distant location.

Functional outcome of two different grafting techniques in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a comparative evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the functional efficacy of two different grafting techniques following the fibrotomy among subjects with oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF).

DESIGN

Forty consecutively treated OSMF subjects between 20 and 40 years who had grades 3 and 4a OSMF and mouth opening < 15 mm were included in the present study. All the subjects were randomly divided into two groups. In Group I, all the subjects received a buccal pad of fat sandwiched with a nasolabial flap following fibrotomy. In contrast, Group II subjects received a buccal pad of fat combined with a collagen graft. The effect of two different surgical protocols on mouth opening was evaluated clinically before the surgery (T₀) and 1 month (T₁), 6 months (T₂), and 12 months (T₃) after the surgery.

RESULTS

In Group I subjects, the mouth opening increased significantly (P < 0.001) from 10.90 ± 1.971 mm at T₀ to 34.25 ± 3.127 mm at T₁, but reduced marginally to 32.15 ± 3.422 mm at T₂, and 31.30 ± 3.358 mm at T₃. In Group II, the mouth opening increased significantly (P < 0.001) from 10.85 ± 1.725 mm at T₀ to 28.90 ± 3.059 mm, 29.10 ± 2.808 mm, and 28.20 ± 2.285 mm at T₁, T₂, and T_3, respectively. At the end of 12 months of follow-up, the mean value improvement in the mouth opening (T₀-T₃) was 20.4 ± 3.5 mm and 17.3 ± 2.9 mm in Groups I and II, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The buccal pad of fat sandwiched with a nasolabial flap for the reconstruction following fibrotomy had a slightly better beneficial effect on the postoperative mouth opening among OSMF subjects.

A Comparative Evaluation between the Use of Buccal Pad of Fat and Bovine Collagen Membrane in the Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis

Purpose

This study is intended to assess and compare the effectiveness of BFP and BCM as reconstruction materials in treating oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF).

Materials and Methods

This study comprised twenty patients of 20 and 60 years who were clinically diagnosed with OSMF. All patients were subjected to fibrotomy with reconstruction under general anesthesia. In all the patients, following fibrotomy reconstruction was done using the buccal pad of fat on the left and with the collagen membrane on the right. The temporal muscle insertions were released, and coronoidectomy was performed as and when required. Any third molars if present were removed. All patients were feeded for 7 days by Ryle's tube and were on intravenous antibiotics for 5 days. Clinical evaluation was done at periodic intervals of 7, 30, 90, and 180 days postoperatively for mouth opening, burning, pain on mouth opening, and recurrence.

Results

The mean age of patients was 27.3 years. A 12 mm was mean preoperative mouth opening. Intraoperative mouth opening was 37 mm in all the patients and maintained at 36 mm at the 6^th-month postoperative period. No significant difference was observed between both sides pertaining to pain on maximal mouth opening, burning sensation, or postoperative infection. However, there was a significant difference in the time taken for epithelization on both sides.

Conclusion

The results of this study reveal that both Buccal Pad of Fat (BPF) and BCM are viable reconstruction options, but BFP as a reconstruction material exhibited prompt epithelization with the lowest wound contracture.

Use of the greater palatine pedicled flap for the surgical management of trismus in oral submucous fibrosis

The aim of this paper was to clinically evaluate the efficacy of the greater palatine pedicled flap (GPPF) for the correction of trismus in oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF). This retrospective study was designed from the patients diagnosed with OSMF who underwent transection of fibrous bands and coverage of the defect in the retromolar trigone (RMT) region using GPPF from 2008-2019. Cases were analysed for preoperative (MO_pre-op), and postoperative mouth opening (MO_post-op), secondary healing of the palate, and complications of the procedure. A total of 29 diagnosed cases of OSMF were divided into two groups: group I/stage III (n=13) and group II/stage IV (n=16). The mean (SD) follow up was 29.6 (2.92) months for Group I and 32.4 (3.54) months for Group II. Increase in MO_post-op in group I from 20.0 to 32.92 mm (p=0.0001) and in group II from 6.81 to 26.31 (p=0.0001) was statistically significant. The mean difference of 6.57 mm in MO_pre-op and MO_post-op among the groups was also statistically significant (p=0.0001). The mean (SD) duration for secondary healing of the palate was 5 (1) week(s) and flap necrosis was encountered in two cases of group II/stage IV OSMF. We conclude that GPPF is reliable for the treatment of trismus in advanced stages of OSMF.

Efficacy of collagen-silicone bilayer membrane in the management of oral submucous fibrosis: a prospective case series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Oral submucous fibrosis is a scourge of Southeastern Asia since a long time resulting in significant health and social problems. Mainstay of the treatment is concentrated on attempts to improve mouth opening and relieve the symptoms by medicinal or surgical means. In moderate to severe cases, release of fibrous bands is advocated followed by placement of graft. The present study was conducted to evaluate the use of collagen-silicone bilayer membrane as a mucosal substitute in its management.

METHODOLOGY

Study consisted of 12 clinically and histologically proven cases of OSMF. After the incision and release of fibrous bands, a collagen membrane was placed and secured over the raw area by placement of a silicone sheet of adequate thickness. Parameters were assessed pre-operatively, intra-operatively, and post-operatively at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. The data was recorded and statistical analysis was done.

RESULTS

Pre-operatively, the mean values of inter-incisal opening, cheek flexibility, and width of oral commissure were 16.92, 24.58, and 53.17 mm respectively whereas at 3 months post-operatively, it was 27.67, 26.58, and 55.00 mm, which was statistically significant. No incidence of infection was noted.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that the use of collagen membrane along with silicone sheet can be an alternative to other graft materials in context of reduced donor site morbidity as well as significant increase in inter-incisal opening. However, study with more sample size is needed to assess the long-term efficiency and surgical outcome of this material.