Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in treatment-naïve 'real-life' patients in India

Impact of Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy for Treatment of Hepatitis C Genotypes 1, 3 and 4: A Real Life Experience from India

OBJECTIVE

To assess impact of Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) therapies for treatment of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotypes 1, 3 and 4 in a real-world cohort from India.

METHODS

Adults with chronic HCV infection treated with Sofosbuvir (SOF) and Ledipasvir (LDV) (genotypes 1 and 4) or SOF and Daclatasvir (DCV) (genotype 3), with or without Ribavirin (RBV) between December 2015 and December 2016 were included. The primary endpoint was Sustained Virological Response at Post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12).

RESULTS

Of the 648 patients, 181 received SOF/LDV (65 with RBV) and 467 received SOF/DCV (135 with RBV). Most patients were males (65.4%), aged 41-60 years (49.4%) and treatment-naïve (92.6%). Genotype 3 (72.1%) was most common, followed by genotypes 1 (22.4%) and 4 (5.6%). Forty two percent patients (n = 271) had cirrhosis (112 patients were decompensated). SVR12 (modified intention-to-treat) was achieved by 98.1% of patients (512/522) (100% in genotypes 1 and 4, and 97.3% (362/372) in genotype 3). On intention to treat analysis, SVR12 was 88.1% (512/581) [genotype 1-96.8% (121/125), genotype 3-85.2%, genotype 4-93.5% (29/31)]. Seventy patients had treatment failure (non response in 6, virological breakthrough in 2, 10 patients relapsed, 2 died and 50 were lost to follow up). High SVR was observed regardless of HCV genotype, presence of cirrhosis or past history of treatment. No major adverse events warranting discontinuation of treatment were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

DAA therapy for HCV genotypes 1, 3 and 4 achieves high SVR rates in all patients, including those with cirrhosis and previous non-responders.

Demographic profile, host, disease & viral predictive factors of response in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection at a tertiary care hospital in north India

Background & objectives:

Standard of care for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in India is peginterferon and ribavirin (RBV). The response to treatment in real life stetting is unclear. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the demographic profile and assess the virological response and predictors of response in CHC patients.

Methods:

Consecutive patients with CHC were included in this study. Detailed clinical history, risk factors, and predictive factors of response were noted. Patients were treated with peginterferon α2b (1.5 µg/kg/wk) and RBV (12 mg/kg/day) for 6 to 18 months based on response.

Results:

A total of 211 patients were included in the analysis, mean age 40.6±12.3 yr, 144 (68%) were males and 71 (34%) had compensated cirrhosis. Commonest risk factor for acquiring CHC was previous transfusion and surgery (51%). Genotype 3 (72%) was most common followed by genotype 1 (23%). Overall sustained virologic response (SVR) was 64 per cent [95% CI 57.1%-70.4%]. The SVR was 66.5 per cent [95% CI 58.34-73.89%] for genotype 3 and 61.2 per cent [95% CI 46.23 to 74.80%] for genotype 1. Non-cirrhotics had better SVR rates compared to cirrhotics (76 vs 41%, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, BMI ≥23 kg/m², HOMA-IR ≥2, compliance (≤80%), and fibrosis >2 were predictors of low SVR.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Genotype 3 was the commonest HCV genotype. The commonest source of infection was previous transfusion and surgery. SVR rates for genotypes 3 were better than genotype 1 patients. Predictors of non-response were high BMI, insulin resistance, significant fibrosis and inadequate compliance.

Results of sofosbuvir-based combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C cohort of Indian patients in real-life clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The introduction of sofosbuvir has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. This study was planned to observe whether the efficacy and tolerability of sofosbuvir-based regimens demonstrated in phase 3 clinical trial results translate into real-life clinical practice.

METHODS

This prospective, non-randomized observational study conducted in Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Punjab, included all consecutive treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (genotypes 1-5) who were treated with sofosbuvir-based regimens. Response to therapy was assessed at week 4 (rapid virological response), week 12 or 24 (end of treatment response), and 12 weeks after cessation of therapy (sustained virological response [SVR]).

RESULTS

Of 947 patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus and considered for treatment with direct-acting antivirals, 736 patients (77.1%) opted for treatment (age 45.1 ± 10.1 years, 64% men, genotype 3 [80%], genotype 1 [14.7%], and genotype 4 [4.9%]). Viral load was high (>600 000 IU/mL) in 361/736 (49%); 330 patients (44.8%) had cirrhosis (80 [14.3%] were decompensated). Patients with genotypes 1, 4, and 5 (n = 135) were treated with triple drug regime (pegylated interferon, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir) for 12 weeks. Patients with genotype 3 (n = 589) were treated either with dual therapy (sofosbuvir and ribavirin) for 24 weeks (n = 405) or triple therapy for 12 weeks (n = 184). SVR was achieved in 453/473 (95.8%). SVR rates did not differ among different genotypes but were higher in non-cirrhotics.

CONCLUSION

Sofosbuvir-based treatment regimens achieve high SVR rates in real-life cohort of Indian patients with chronic hepatitis C infection (including those with cirrhosis).

Features of hepatitis C virus infection, current therapies and ongoing clinical trials in ten Asian Pacific countries

Estimated hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection rates in the general populations were 1.3, 0.9, 0.4-1.0, 14.7, 0.1-0.3, 0.9-1.9, 1.0-2.0, 5, 4.4-8.6 and 0.5-1.3 % in Australia, Bangladesh, Mainland China, Egypt, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Pakistan, Taiwan and Turkey, respectively. The main HCV genotypes (Gs) are G1, G3, G1b, G4, G1b, G3, G1b, G3, G1b and G2, and G1 in Australia, Bangladesh, Mainland China, Egypt, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Pakistan, Taiwan and Turkey, respectively. Of IL28B genotypes, favorable alleles are ~50 % in Australia and Turkey, but 60-70 % in most of the other Asian countries. Peginterferon plus ribavirin is available in all ten Asian Pasific countries. In addition, HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitors with peginterferon plus ribavirin are currently available in several countries. Clinical trials of interferon-free regimens for HCV are ongoing in most of the ten Asian Pacific countries.

Optimal Duration of Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 3 Patients who do not Achieve Rapid Virological Response

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype-3 (G-3) patients treated with standard 24-week pegylated interferon plus ribavirin(PEG-RBV) therapy achieve sustained virological response(SVR) rate of 69-82%. Patients who do not achieve rapid virological response(RVR) have lower SVR rate. Data regarding optimal management of this subgroup is scarce. We aimed to determine the most appropriate treatment duration in CHC G-3 patients who do not achieve RVR.

METHODS

Treatment naïve CHC G-3 patients treated with PEG-RBV therapy were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients with cirrhosis were excluded. RVR was assessed in all patients beyond the year 2007. RVR non-achievers were advised extended treatment beyond 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the total 685 patients started on treatment, 646 completed treatment (mean age 39.1 ± 12 years, 68.3% males). In the pre-'RVR assessment' period (2004-2006), SVR with standard 24 week therapy was 72.3% (112/155). In post-'RVR assessment' period (2007-2013), 75.8% (402/530) patients achieved RVR; and 91.5% (368/402) of these achieved SVR with standard 24 weeks therapy. Among RVR non-achievers (n = 128), 51 patients opted for extended 36 week therapy, 12 for 48 week therapy, while 65 stopped therapy at 24 weeks. Choice of treatment duration was dependent entirely on the affordability of the patient. SVR with extended therapy (36/48 weeks) was significantly higher than standard 24 week therapy in RVR non-achievers (82.5% vs. 52.3%; P = 0.003). However, SVR rate in 36 week group was not significantly different from 48 week group (84.3% vs. 75%; P = 0.425]. On multivariate analysis, duration of treatment (36/48 week vs. 24 week; P < 0.001) was significantly associated with SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

SVR rates in CHC G-3 patients treated with PEG-RBV in northern India were comparable to western data. Standard 24 week therapy is adequate for RVR-achievers. However, in RVR non-achievers, extended 36 week therapy significantly improves SVR, while further extension to 48 week does not provide any additional advantage.

Factors affecting outcome of treatment of chronic hepatitis C: result of an open label study from eastern India

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment of hepatitis C involves the use of pegylated interferon (PEGIFN) and ribavirin but directly acting antiviral agents (DAA) with seemingly greater efficacy have now appeared on the market. Thus closer detail needs to be given to optimise the use of the former.

METHODS

Fifty-two chronic hepatitis C patients (Child class A) were administered PEGIFN and ribavirin in a prospective, open label study in standard dose and duration. Complete therapy was ensured for the best chance of achieving a sustained viral response (SVR) and delineating its controlling factors.

RESULTS

Seventy-five percent had genotype 3 virus. Compensated cirrhosis was present in 38.5%. Response overall and in cirrhotics were 65.4% and 30%, respectively, without difference between genotypes 1 and 3. Non-cirrhotics had higher response in all groups, especially genotype 1 (83.3%). The factors associated with positive response were age less than 50 years, absence of cirrhosis and presence of risk factors for transmission.

CONCLUSION

Treatment outcome and factors affecting it are similar to studies from Europe and America.