Diagnostic utility of alarm features in predicting malignancy in patients with dyspeptic symptoms

Yield of alarm features in predicting significant endoscopic findings among hospitalized patients with dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Dyspepsia is a very prevalent upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms complex. Some of these symptoms might arise from serious underlying diseases, so the promotion of evidence-based guidelines could potentially better align evaluation and treatment.

AIM

To determine the value of alarm features as a predictive factor for significant endoscopic findings (SEFs) among hospitalized patients presenting with dyspepsia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study including information about 6208 endoscopic procedures performed for hospitalized patients. Patients were divided into two groups, with and without SEFs, and compared to elucidate the ability of the different alarm features to predict SEFs.

RESULTS

During the study, 605 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. When the demographics and clinical characteristics of the two groups were compared, tachycardia (P < 0.05), normocytic anemia, (P < 0.05), leukocytosis (P < 0.05), and hypoalbuminemia (P < 0.05) documented on admission prior to endoscopy were strong predictors of SEFs. Among the alarm features, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, persistent vomiting, odynophagia [odds ratio (OR) = 3.81, P < 0.05; OR = 1.75, P = 0.03; and OR = 7.81, P = 0.07, respectively] were associated with SEFs. Unexplained weight loss was strongly associated with malignancy as an endoscopic finding (OR = 2.05; P < 0.05). In addition, long-term use of anti-aggregate medications other than aspirin (P < 0.05) was correlated to SEFs.

CONCLUSION

Novel predictors of SEFs were elucidated in this study. These parameters could be used as an adjunctive in decision making regarding performing upper endoscopy in hospitalized patients with dyspepsia.

Indian consensus statements on irritable bowel syndrome in adults: A guideline by the Indian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association and jointly supported by the Indian Society of Gastroenterology

The Indian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association (INMA), earlier named the Indian Motility and Functional Diseases Association developed this evidence-based practice guidelines for the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). A modified Delphi process was used to develop this consensus containing 28 statements, which were concerning diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, etiopathogenesis and comorbidities, investigations, lifestyle modifications and treatments. Owing to the Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, lockdowns and mobility restrictions, web-based meetings and electronic voting were the major tools used to develop this consensus. A statement was regarded as accepted when the sum of "completely accepted" and "accepted with minor reservation" voted responses were 80% or higher. Finally, the consensus was achieved on all 28 statements. The consensus team members are of the view that this work may find use in teaching, patient care, and research on IBS in India and other nations.

Dyspepsia with alarm symptoms in patients aged less than 60 years: Is upper gastrointestinal endoscopy justified in Indian scenario?

BACKGROUND

Newer American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) guidelines do not suggest endoscopy to investigate alarm features for dyspepsia patients under the age of 60 to exclude upper gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasia. The validity of this recommendation has not been evaluated in our population. So, this study was conducted to assess the utility of upper GI endoscopy to investigate alarm features in dyspepsia patients less than 60 years of age to exclude upper GI neoplasia.

METHODS

This prospective observational study evaluated consecutive patients of dyspepsia between 18 and 60 years of age, with at least one or more of the alarm symptoms (unintentional weight loss; loss of appetite; GI bleeding; anemia; recurrent or persistent vomiting; dysphagia with predominant epigastric pain; and family history of upper GI cancer) with upper GI endoscopy to exclude any organic lesion and malignancy.

RESULTS

Of total 294 patients evaluated with endoscopy, 34.7% (n=102) had normal endoscopy (functional dyspepsia [FD]) while 65.3% (n=192) had abnormal endoscopic findings (organic dyspepsia [OD]). Of 192 patients with OD, 146 patients (49.6% of the total study population) had benign abnormality (benign OD) while 46 patients (15.6% of the total study population) had malignancy of the upper GI tract (malignant OD).

CONCLUSION

The investigation of alarm features in dyspepsia patients less than 60 years of age with upper GI endoscopy leads to detection of organic lesion (65.3%) including malignancy (15.6%) in a significant percentage of patients.

Quality of life in Indian patients with functional dyspepsia: Translation and validation of the Hindi version of Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) have poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL), but Indian data are  lacking. Also, there is non-availability of validated disease-specific questionnaire to assess HRQOL in Hindi-speaking patients with dyspepsia. We aimed to develop and validate a reliable translation of Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI) in Hindi, and assess the impact of FD on HRQOL in Indian patients.

METHODS

Cross-cultural adaptation of English version of SF-NDI, translation to Hindi, and adaptation of Hindi version were performed using standard procedures. English and Hindi versions were assessed against Short Form-36 (SF-36), examining for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity.

RESULTS

Total 211 FD patients (144 Hindi speaking, 67 English speaking) were enrolled (mean age 40.8 ± 11.7 years; male:female = 115:96). Median total SF-NDI scores for both languages were 38.75 and 40.0, respectively. Test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.85 (Hindi) and 0.89 (English). Internal consistency evaluation revealed Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.79-0.86 (Hindi) and 0.78-0.89 (English). SF-NDI sub-scales showed moderate to good correlation with various domains of SF-36 (content validity). There was significant (p &lt; 0.001) decline of HRQOL in patients with severe dyspepsia relative to those with mild dyspepsia (construct validity). On multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with HRQOL were duration of symptoms and dyspepsia severity.

CONCLUSION

Both English and Hindi versions of SF-NDI are reliable and valid for HRQOL assessment in Indian FD patients, and will be useful in future epidemiological and clinical studies. Indian FD patients have poor HRQOL, being worse in those with severe dyspepsia and longer duration of symptoms.