Systematic review and meta-analysis of lung cancer brain metastasis and primary tumor receptor expression discordance

Predicting the T790M mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using brain metastasis MR radiomics: a study with an imbalanced dataset

BACKGROUND

Early detection of T790M mutation in exon 20 of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies. In this study, we developed radiomics models to distinguish NSCLC patients with T790M-positive mutations from those with T790M-negative mutations using multisequence MR images of brain metastasis despite an imbalanced dataset. Various resampling techniques and classifiers were employed to identify the most effective strategy.

METHODS

Radiomic analyses were conducted on a dataset comprising 125 patients, consisting of 18 with EGFR T790M-positive mutations and 107 with T790M-negative mutations. Seventeen first- and second-order statistical features were selected from CET1WI, T2WI, T2FLAIR, and DWI images. Four classifiers (logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest [RF], and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]) were evaluated under 13 different resampling conditions.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) value achieved was 0.89, using the SVM-SMOTE oversampling method in combination with the XGBoost classifier. This performance was measured against the AUC reported in the literature, serving as an upper-bound reference. Additionally, comparable results were observed with other oversampling methods paired with RF or XGBoost classifiers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that, even when dealing with an imbalanced EGFR T790M dataset, reasonable predictive outcomes can be achieved by employing an appropriate combination of resampling techniques and classifiers. This approach has significant potential for enhancing T790M mutation detection in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis.

[Brain metastases]

Cerebral metastases in patients with metastatic lung cancer are found in more than 30% of patients at baseline and manifest themselves in two out of three patients during disease evolution. For a long time, the cerebral manifestation of the disease was classified as prognostically unfavorable and hence such patients were regularly excluded from therapy studies. In the context of targeted molecular therapy strategies and established immuno-oncological systemic therapies, the blood-brain barrier no longer represents an insurmountable barrier. However, the treatment of brain metastases requires decision making in a multidisciplinary team within dedicated lung cancer and/or oncology centers. The differentiated treatment decision is based on the number, size and location of the brain metastases, neurology and general condition, comorbidities, potential life expectancy and the patient's wishes, but also tumor biology including molecular targets, extra-cranial tumor burden and availability of a CNS-effective therapy. Systemic therapies as well as neurosurgical and radiotherapeutic concepts are now often combined for optimized and prognosis-improving therapeutic strategies.

Cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA testing shows an advantage over plasma ctDNA testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

Background

Brain metastases (BM), including brain parenchyma metastases (BPM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM), are devastating metastatic complications in advanced cancer patients. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is emerging as a new promising tool for profiling cancer mutation, which could facilitate the diagnosis of cancer. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the molecular genetic characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with BPM and LM using NGS.

Methods

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples and paired plasma samples were collected from 37 patients of NSCLC-BM. We profiled genetic mutation characteristics using NGS from NSCLC-BM by comparing CSF circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) with plasma ctDNA and primary tumour tissues.

Results

Among the 37 patients with NSCLC-BM, 28 patients had LM with or without BPM, while 9 patients only had BPM. Driver and drug-resistant mutations in primary tumours with LM included: EGFR L858R (10, 35.7%), EGFR 19del (6, 21.4%), EGFR L858R+MET (1, 3.6%), EGFR L858R+S768I (1, 3.6%), ALK (2, 7.1%), ROS1 (1, 3.6%), negative (5, 17.9%), and unknown (2, 7.1%). In patients with NSCLC-LM, the detection rate and abundance of ctDNA in the CSF were significantly higher than those in paired plasma. The main driver mutations of NSCLC-LM remained highly consistent with those of the primary tumours, along with other unique mutations. Circulating tumour DNA was negative in the CSF samples of BPM patients. Patients with BMP had a higher ratio of EGFR 19del than L858R mutation (55.6% vs 11.1.%), whereas NSCLC patients with LM had a higher ratio of EGFR L858R than 19del mutation (50.0% vs 25.0%). Most patients with positive plasma ctDNA results were male (p = 0.058) and in an unstable state (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Our study indicated that the CSF ctDNA detected by NGS may reflect the molecular characteristics and heterogeneity of NSCLC-LM. Timely screening of patients with NSCLC for CSF ctDNA, especially for patients with positive plasma ctDNA, may facilitate the early detection of LM. Furthermore, patients with the EGFR 19del may have a higher risk of developing BPM.

Outcomes of surgery and subsequent therapy for central nervous system oligoprogression in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND

Oligoprogression is an emerging issue in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the surgical treatment for central nervous system (CNS) oligoprogression is not widely discussed. We investigated the outcomes of craniotomy with adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and subsequent therapies for CNS oligoprogression in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

METHODS

NSCLC patients with CNS oligoprogression were identified from a tertiary medical center. The outcomes of surgery with adjuvant WBRT or WBRT alone were analyzed, along with other variables. Overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed using the log-rank test as the primary and secondary endpoints. A COX regression model was used to identify the possible prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients with CNS oligoprogression who underwent surgery or WBRT were included in the study after reviewing 728 patients. Twenty-one patients underwent surgery with adjuvant WBRT, and 16 received WBRT alone. The median overall survival for surgery and WBRT alone groups was 43 (95% CI 17-69) and 22 (95% CI 15-29) months, respectively. Female sex was a positive prognostic factor for overall survival (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.57). Patients who continued previous tyrosine kinase inhibitors (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.06-11.4) and induced oligoprogression (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.18-9.52) were associated with worse overall survival. Smoking history (OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.54-11.8) and induced oligoprogression (OR 5.53, 95% CI 2.1-14.7) were associated with worse progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery combined with adjuvant WBRT is a feasible treatment modality for CNS oligoprogression in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Changing the systemic-targeted therapy after local treatments may be associated with improved overall survival.

What if: A retrospective reconstruction of resection cavity stereotactic radiosurgery to mimic neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery

Introduction

Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (NaSRS) of brain metastases has gained importance, but it is not routinely performed. While awaiting the results of prospective studies, we aimed to analyze the changes in the volume of brain metastases irradiated pre- and postoperatively and the resulting dosimetric effects on normal brain tissue (NBT).

Methods

We identified patients treated with SRS at our institution to compare hypothetical preoperative gross tumor and planning target volumes (pre-GTV and pre-PTV) with original postoperative resection cavity volumes (post-GTV and post-PTV) as well as with a standardized-hypothetical PTV with 2.0 mm margin. We used Pearson correlation to assess the association between the GTV and PTV changes with the pre-GTV. A multiple linear regression analysis was established to predict the GTV change. Hypothetical planning for the selected cases was created to assess the volume effect on the NBT exposure. We performed a literature review on NaSRS and searched for ongoing prospective trials.

Results

We included 30 patients in the analysis. The pre-/post-GTV and pre-/post-PTV did not differ significantly. We observed a negative correlation between pre-GTV and GTV-change, which was also a predictor of volume change in the regression analysis, in terms of a larger volume change for a smaller pre-GTV. In total, 62.5% of cases with an enlargement greater than 5.0 cm3 were smaller tumors (pre-GTV < 15.0 cm3), whereas larger tumors greater than 25.0 cm3 showed only a decrease in post-GTV. Hypothetical planning for the selected cases to evaluate the volume effect resulted in a median NBT exposure of only 67.6% (range: 33.2-84.5%) relative to the dose received by the NBT in the postoperative SRS setting. Nine published studies and twenty ongoing studies are listed as an overview.

Conclusion

Patients with smaller brain metastases may have a higher risk of volume increase when irradiated postoperatively. Target volume delineation is of great importance because the PTV directly affects the exposure of NBT, but it is a challenge when contouring resection cavities. Further studies should identify patients at risk of relevant volume increase to be preferably treated with NaSRS in routine practice. Ongoing clinical trials will evaluate additional benefits of NaSRS.

Emerging Systemic Treatment Perspectives on Brain Metastases: Moving Toward a Better Outlook for Patients

The diagnosis of brain metastases has historically been a dreaded, end-stage complication of systemic disease. Additionally, with the increasing effectiveness of systemic therapies that prolong life expectancy and improved imaging tools, the incidence of intracranial progression is becoming more common. Within this context, there has been increasing attention directed at understanding the molecular underpinnings of intracranial progression. Exploring the unique features of brain metastases compared with their extracranial counterparts to identify aberrant signaling pathways, which can be targeted pharmacologically, may help lead to new treatments for this patient population. Additionally, critical discoveries outside the sphere of the central nervous system are increasingly being applied to brain metastases with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibition, becoming a prevalent treatment option for patients with brain metastases across multiple histologies. As novel treatment strategies are considered, they require thoughtful incorporation of agents that can cross the blood-brain barrier and can synergize with pre-existing agents through rational combinations. Lastly, as clinicians and scientists continue to understand key molecular features of these tumors, they will continue to influence the treatment algorithms that are developing for the management of these patients. Due to the complexity of treatment decisions for patients with brain metastases, an emerging tool is the utilization of multidisciplinary brain metastasis tumor boards to ensure optimal treatment decisions are made and that patients are provided access to applicable clinical trials. Looking to the future, the collective effort to understand the various tumor-intrinsic and tumor-extrinsic factors that promote central nervous system seeding and propagation will have the potential to change the clinical trajectory for these patients.