Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022

Pharmacological and Device-Based Intervention for Preventing Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction - A Clinical Review

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF) is one of the most common complications that is associated with a significant burden of mortality and healthcare resources. The clinical benefits of key HF drugs, the so-called "4 pillars" or "fantastic 4", namely β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, have been established in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, whereas the effects of these drugs are not comprehensively appreciated in patients with acute MI. This review summarizes current evidence on pharmacological and device-based interventions for preventing HF after acute MI.

State-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease in Japan

Percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease (LM-PCI) represents a high-risk yet life-saving procedure that has evolved significantly over the years. This review outlines the current state-of-the-art practices for LM-PCI in Japan in detail, emphasizing the integration of coronary physiology and intracoronary imaging alongside with evidence-based standardized technique using latest drug-eluting stents. These advancements enable precise lesion assessment, stent sizing, and optimal deployment, thereby enhancing procedural safety and efficacy. Despite discrepancies between current guidelines favoring coronary artery bypass grafting and real-world practice trends towards increased LM-PCI adoption, particularly in elderly populations with multiple comorbidities, careful patient selection and procedural planning are critical. Future perspectives include further refining LM-PCI through conducting randomized controlled trials integrating advanced techniques and addressing the issue of ostial left circumflex lesions and nationwide standardization of medical care for LM disease.

Advances in Technology and Technique in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Clinical Review

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the standard procedure for patients with angina and acute coronary syndrome. From the perspective of technology and technique, PCI has advanced over the last four decades, resulting in considerably improved clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease in the current era. In this review article, we summarize recent advances, promising technologies, and areas for research in the field of PCI.

Combined assessment of fractional flow reserve, resting full-cycle ratio, and resting ratio of distal coronary to aortic pressure for clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and non-hyperemic indices are invasive standards for evaluating functional significance of coronary stenosis. However, data are limited about outcomes in vessels with concordant and discordant physiological results, particularly with a ratio of distal coronary to aortic pressure (Pd/Pa) at rest.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Coronary physiological indices including FFR, resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), and resting Pd/Pa were invasively evaluated in vessels with intermediate coronary artery stenosis. FFR ≤0.80, RFR ≤0.89, and resting Pd/Pa ≤0.92 were considered physiologically positive. Vessels were divided into three groups according to the results of FFR, RFR, and resting Pd/Pa: concordant positive (all positive for FFR, RFR, and resting Pd/Pa), concordant negative (all negative for FFR, RFR, and resting Pd/Pa), and discordant groups. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) defined as a composite of cardiac death and target vessel myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization.

RESULTS

Of 987 vessels included, 311 (31.5 %), 263 (26.6 %), and 413 (41.9 %) were in the concordant positive, discordant, and concordant negative groups. During a median follow-up period of 417 (208-756) days, TVF occurred more frequently in the concordant positive group, followed by the discordant and concordant negative groups (7.7 % vs. 4.6 % vs. 2.4 %, p = 0.004). TVF increasingly accrued during long-term follow-up, while discordant results of RFR and resting Pd/Pa did not result in worse outcomes compared with negative RFR and resting Pd/Pa.

CONCLUSION

The combined assessment of FFR with RFR and resting Pd/Pa stratified TVF risks in vessels with intermediate coronary stenosis.

Impact of Antiplatelet Therapy on 5-Year Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Deferral of Revascularization in Nonsignificant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Background

Because the clinical benefit of antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease (CAD) remains poorly understood, we evaluated it in patients after fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferral of revascularization.

Methods and Results

From the J-CONFIRM (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients with Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), we investigated 265 patients with deferred lesions who did not require APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A 2-year landmark analysis assessed the relationship between APT at 2 years and 5-year major cardiac adverse events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization). Of the 265 patients, 163 (61.5%) received APT. The 5-year MACE did not significantly differ between the APT and non-APT groups after adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics (9.2% vs. 6.9%, inverse probability weighted hazard ratio, 1.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.53-3.69]; P=0.49). There was a marginal interaction between the effect of APT on MACE and FFR values (< or ≥0.84) (P for interaction=0.066).

Conclusions

The 5-year outcomes after FFR-guided deferral of revascularization did not significantly differ between the APT and non-APT groups, suggesting that APT might not be a critical requirement for nonsignificant obstructive CAD patients not requiring APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Physiological Assessment with iFR prior to FFR Measurement in Left Main Disease

Despite guideline-based recommendation of the interchangeable use of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularization decision-making, iFR/FFR could demonstrate different physiological or clinical outcomes in some specific patient or lesion subsets. Therefore, we sought to investigate the impact of difference between iFR and FFR-guided revascularization decision-making on clinical outcomes in patients with left main disease (LMD). In this international multicenter registry of LMD with physiological interrogation, we identified 275 patients in whom physiological assessment was performed with both iFR/FFR. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for both iFR/FFR to predict MACE in respective patients in whom revascularization was deferred and performed. In 153 patients of revascularization deferral, MACE occurred in 17.0% patients. The optimal cut-off values of iFR and FFR to predict MACE were 0.88 (specificity:0.74; sensitivity:0.65) and 0.76 (specificity:0.81; sensitivity:0.46), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was significantly higher for iFR than FFR (0.74; 95%CI 0.62-0.85 vs. 0.62; 95%CI 0.48-0.75; p = 0.012). In 122 patients of coronary revascularization, MACE occurred in 13.1% patients. The optimal cut-off values of iFR and FFR were 0.92 (specificity:0.93; sensitivity:0.25) and 0.81 (specificity:0.047; sensitivity:1.00), respectively. The AUCs were not significantly different between iFR and FFR (0.57; 95%CI 0.40-0.73 vs. 0.46; 95%CI 0.31-0.61; p = 0.43). While neither baseline iFR nor FFR was predictive of MACE in patients in whom revascularization was performed, iFR-guided deferral seemed to be safer than FFR-guided deferral.

Prognostic Value of Microvascular Resistance Reserve Measured Immediately After PCI in Stable Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) has been proposed as a specific metric to quantify coronary microvascular function. The long-term prognostic value of MRR measured in stable patients immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. This study sought to determine the prognostic value of MRR measured immediately after PCI in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

METHODS

This study included 502 patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent elective PCI and coronary physiological measurements, including pressure and flow estimation using a bolus thermodilution method after PCI. MRR was calculated as coronary flow reserve divided by fractional flow reserve times the ratio of mean aortic pressure at rest to that at maximal hyperemia induced by hyperemic agents. An abnormal MRR was defined as ≤2.5. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the cumulative MACE rate was significantly higher in the abnormal MRR group (12.5 versus 8.3 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio 1.53 [95% CI, 1.10-2.11]; P<0.001). A higher all-cause mortality rate primarily drove this difference. On multivariable analysis, a higher MRR value was independently associated with lower MACE and lower mortality. When comparing 4 subgroups according to MRR and the index of microcirculatory resistance, patients with both abnormal MRR and index of microcirculatory resistance (≥25) had the highest MACE rate.

CONCLUSIONS

An abnormal MRR measured immediately after PCI in patients with stable coronary artery disease is an independent predictor of MACE, particularly all-cause mortality.

Diagnostic Ability of Manual Calcification Length Assessment on Non-Electrocardiographically Gated Computed Tomography for Estimating the Presence of Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Coronary artery calcification score (CACS) on electrocardiography (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) is used for risk stratification of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which requires dedicated analytic software. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic ability of manual calcification length assessment on non-ECG-gated CT for epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: A total of 100 patients undergoing both non-ECG-gated plain CT scans with a slice interval of 1.25 mm and invasive coronary angiography were retrospectively included. We manually measured the length of the longest calcified lesions of coronary arteries on each branch. The relationship between the number of coronary arteries with the length of coronary calcium > 5, 10, or 15 mm and the presence of epicardial CAD on invasive angiography was evaluated. Standard CACS was also evaluated using established software. Results: Of 100 patients, 49 (49.0%) had significant epicardial CAD on angiography. The median standard CACS was 346 [7, 1965]. In both manual calcium assessment and standard CACS, the increase in calcium burden was progressively associated with the presence of epicardial CAD on angiography. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed similar diagnostic abilities of the two diagnostic methods. The best cut-off values for CAD were 2, 1, and 1 for the number of vessels with calcium > 5, 10, and 15 mm, respectively. Overall, the diagnostic ability of manual calcium assessment was similar to that of standard CACS > 400. Conclusions: Manual assessment of coronary calcium length on non-ECG-gated plain CT provided similar diagnostic ability for the presence of significant epicardial CAD on invasive angiography, as compared to standard CACS.

Diagnostic performance of pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve

Fluid dynamics studies have proposed that coronary flow reserve can be calculated from coronary artery pressure instead of coronary blood flow. We sought to investigate the diagnostic performance of pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve (pb-CFR) compared with CFR measured by conventional thermodilution method (CFRthermo) in the clinical setting. Pressure guidewire was used to measure CFRthermo and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in left anterior descending coronary artery in 62 patients with stable coronary artery disease. Pb-CFR was calculated only with resting distal coronary artery pressure (Pd), resting aortic pressure (Pa) and FFR. Pb-CFR was moderately correlated with CFRthermo (r = 0.54, P < 0.001). Pb-CFR showed a poor agreement with CFRthermo, presenting large values of mean difference and root mean square deviation (1.5 ± 1.4). Pb-CFR < 2.0 predicted CFRthermo < 2.0 with an accuracy of 79%, sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 78%, positive predictive value of 48%, negative predictive value of 95%. The discordance presenting CFRthermo < 2.0 and pb-CFR ≥ 2.0 was associated with diffuse disease (P < 0.001). The discordance presenting CFRthermo ≥ 2 and pb-CFR < 2 was associated with a high FFR (P = 0.002). Pb-CFR showed moderate correlation and poor agreement with CFRthermo. Pb-CFR might be reliable in excluding epicardial coronary artery disease and microcirculatory disorders.

Relation of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Frame Count to Invasively Measured Coronary Physiologic Indexes

In the international guidelines, higher thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (TFC) is indicated as evidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). However, the association of TFC with invasively measured coronary physiologic parameters such as coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) remains unclear. Patients without significant epicardial coronary lesions underwent invasive coronary physiologic assessment using a thermodilution method in the left anterior descending artery. Corrected TFC (cTFC) was evaluated on coronary angiography. The cut-off values of CFR and IMR were defined as ≤2.0 and >25, and patients with abnormal CFR and/or IMR were defined as having CMD. This study aimed to assess whether cTFC >25, a cut-off value in the guidelines, was diagnostic of the presence of CMD. Of the 137 patients, 34 (24.8%) and 32 (23.3%) had cTFC >25 and CMD, respectively. The rate of CMD was not significantly different between patients with and without cTFC >25. cTFC was weakly correlated with at rest and hyperemic mean transit time and IMR, whereas no significant correlation was observed between cTFC and CFR. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the poor diagnostic ability of cTFC for abnormal CFR and IMR and the presence of CMD. In conclusion, in patients without epicardial coronary lesions, cTFC as a continuous value and with the cut-off value of 25 was not diagnostic of abnormal CFR and IMR and the presence of CMD. Our results did not support the use of cTFC in CMD evaluation.

Omitting 50 μg of intracoronary acetylcholine injection in the left coronary artery during spasm provocation test

BACKGROUND

Although guidelines recommend intracoronary administration of acetylcholine (ACh) with incremental doses of 20, 50, and 100 μg into the left coronary artery (LCA) during spasm provocation test for diagnosing vasospastic angina, 50 μg of ACh rarely induced significant coronary vasospasm when no vasoconstriction was observed with 20 μg of ACh in a previous report. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of omitting 50 μg according to the vasoreactivity by 20 μg of ACh in the LCA.

METHODS

A total of 556 patients undergoing ACh provocation test with 20 μg followed by 50 and/or 100 μg were retrospectively included. Injection of 50 μg of ACh was primarily omitted when vasoconstriction <25 % was observed with 20 μg, which was left to operator's discretion. Adverse events were defined as a composite of ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and cardiogenic shock during ACh test in the LCA.

RESULTS

Positive ACh test in the LCA was observed in 245 (44.1 %) patients. Overall, patients with LCA constriction <25 % by 20 μg of ACh had a lower rate of positive ACh test than their counterpart (24.0 % vs. 88.4 %, p < 0.001). In patients with LCA constriction ≥25 % by 20 μg, the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher than in those with LCA constriction <25 % during the provocation test at doses of 50 and 100 μg (2.3 % vs. 0 %, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Omitting 50 μg of ACh in the LCA may be safe and feasible when little vasoconstriction was observed with preceding injection of 20 μg of ACh during spasm provocation test for diagnosing vasospastic angina. However, we believe that 50 μg of ACh should not be omitted when 20 μg of ACh induced LCA constriction ≥25 %.

A multi-dimensional CFD framework for fast patient-specific fractional flow reserve prediction

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is considered as the gold standard for diagnosing coronary myocardial ischemia. Existing 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods attempt to predict FFR noninvasively using coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). However, the accuracy and efficiency of the 3D CFD methods in coronary arteries are considerably limited. In this work, we introduce a multi-dimensional CFD framework that improves the accuracy of FFR prediction by estimating 0D patient-specific boundary conditions, and increases the efficiency by generating 3D initial conditions. The multi-dimensional CFD models contain the 3D vascular model for coronary simulation, the 1D vascular model for iterative optimization, and the 0D vascular model for boundary conditions expression. To improve the accuracy, we utilize clinical parameters to derive 0D patient-specific boundary conditions with an optimization algorithm. To improve the efficiency, we evaluate the convergence state using the 1D vascular model and obtain the convergence parameters to generate appropriate 3D initial conditions. The 0D patient-specific boundary conditions and the 3D initial conditions are used to predict FFR (FFRC). We conducted a retrospective study involving 40 patients (61 diseased vessels) with invasive FFR and their corresponding CTA images. The results demonstrate that the FFRC and the invasive FFR have a strong linear correlation (r = 0.80, p < 0.001) and high consistency (mean difference: 0.014 ±0.071). After applying the cut-off value of FFR (0.8), the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FFRC were 88.5%, 93.3%, 83.9%, 84.8%, and 92.9%, respectively. Compared with the conventional zero initial conditions method, our method improves prediction efficiency by 71.3% per case. Therefore, our multi-dimensional CFD framework is capable of improving the accuracy and efficiency of FFR prediction significantly.

Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Frame Count for Coronary Blood Flow Evaluation during Interventional Diagnostic Procedures

Background and Objectives: An interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP), including intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation and coronary physiological testing, is recommended as an invasive diagnostic standard for patients suspected of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). Recent guidelines suggest Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count (TFC) as an alternative to wire-based coronary physiological indices for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction. We evaluated trajectories of TFC during IDP and the impact of ACh provocation on TFC. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Patients who underwent IDP to diagnose INOCA were included and divided into two groups according to the positive or negative ACh provocation test. Wire-based invasive physiological assessment was preceded by ACh provocation tests and intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN). We evaluated TFC at three different time points during IDP; pre-ACh, post-ISDN, and post-hyperemia. Results: Of 104 patients, 58 (55.8%) had positive ACh provocation test. In the positive ACh group, resting mean transit time (Tmn) and baseline resistance index were significantly higher than in the negative ACh group. Post-ISDN TFC was significantly correlated with resting Tmn (r = 0.31, p = 0.002). Absolute TFC values were highest at pre-ACh, followed by post-ISDN and post-hyperemia in both groups. All between-time point differences in TFC were statistically significant in both groups, except for the change from pre-ACh to post-ISDN in the positive ACh group. Conclusions: In patients suspected of INOCA, TFC was modestly correlated with Tmn, a surrogate of coronary blood flow. The positive ACh provocation test influenced coronary blood flow assessment during IDP.

Cardiovascular events in patients with deferred lesions and chronic kidney disease

No study has reported the association between the worsening of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular events in patients with deferred coronary artery lesions. We included patients with deferred lesions, defined as a fractional flow reserve (FFR) value > 0.80 treated with conservative medical therapy. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1, CKD stages 1-2; group 2, CKD stages 3-5; and group 3, CKD stage 5D (hemodialysis), with the clinical outcomes compared. The primary endpoint was the first occurrence of target vessel myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization, or all-cause death. The primary endpoint was noted in 17, 25, and 36 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Within the three groups, the incidence rate of deferred lesions was 7.0%, 10.4%, and 32.4%, respectively. No difference was observed in the incidence of the primary endpoint between groups 1 and 2 (log-rank p = 0.16). However, the patients in group 3 had a significantly higher risk for the primary endpoint than those in groups 1 and 2 (log-rank p < 0.0001). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, the patients in group 3 exhibited a higher incidence of the primary endpoint than those in group 1 (HR: 2.14; 95% CI 1.02-4.49; p < 0.01). Careful management is needed in patients undergoing hemodialysis, even if coronary artery stenosis is considered a deferred lesion.

Prognostic Impact of Renal Function on 5-Year Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Deferral of Revascularization

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) might influence fractional flow reserve (FFR) value, potentially attenuating its prognostic utility. However, few large-scale data are available regarding clinical outcomes after FFR-guided deferral of revascularization in patients with CKD. Methods and Results From the J-CONFIRM registry (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), 1218 patients were divided into 3 groups according to renal function: (1) non-CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min per 1.73 m2), n=385; (2) CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate 15-59 mL/min per 1.73 m2, n=763); and (3) end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (eGFR <15 mL/min per 1.73 m2, n=70). The primary study end point was the cumulative 5-year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinical driven target vessel revascularization. Cumulative 5-year incidence of TVF was significantly higher in the ESRD group than in the CKD and non-CKD group, whereas it did not differ between the CKD and non-CKD groups (26.3% versus 11.9% versus 9.5%, P<0.001). Although the 5-year TVF risk increased as the FFR value decreased regardless of renal function, patients with ESRD had a remarkably higher risk of TVF at every FFR value than those with CKD and non-CKD. Conclusions At 5 years, patients with ESRD showed a higher incidence of TVF than patients with CKD and non-CKD, although with similar outcomes between patients with CKD and non-CKD. Patients with ESRD had an excess risk of 5-year TVF at every FFR value compared with those with CKD and non-CKD. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp; Unique identifier: UMIN000014473.

High-Speed On-Site Deep Learning-Based FFR-CT Algorithm: Evaluation Using Invasive Angiography as the Reference Standard

BACKGROUND. Estimation of fractional flow reserve from coronary CTA (FFR-CT) is an established method of assessing the hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions. However, clinical implementation has progressed slowly, partly because of off-site data transfer with long turnaround times for results. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FFR-CT computed on-site with a high-speed deep learning-based algorithm with invasive hemodynamic indexes as the reference standard. METHODS. This retrospective study included 59 patients (46 men, 13 women; mean age, 66.5 ± 10.2 years) who underwent coronary CTA (including calcium scoring) followed within 90 days by invasive angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or instantaneous wave-free ratio measurements from December 2014 to October 2021. Coronary artery lesions were considered to have hemodynamically significant stenosis in the presence of invasive FFR of 0.80 or less and/or instantaneous wave-free ratio of 0.89 or less. A single cardiologist evaluated the CTA images using an on-site deep learning-based semiautomated algorithm entailing a 3D computational flow dynamics model to determine FFR-CT for coronary artery lesions detected with invasive angiography. Time for FFR-CT analysis was recorded. FFR-CT analysis was repeated by the same cardiologist in 26 randomly selected examinations and by a different cardiologist in 45 randomly selected examinations. Diagnostic performance and agreement were assessed. RESULTS. A total of 74 lesions were identified with invasive angiography. FFR-CT and invasive FFR had strong correlation (r = 0.81) and, in Bland-Altman analysis, bias of 0.01 and 95% limits of agreement of -0.13 to 0.15. FFR-CT had AUC for hemodynamically significant stenosis of 0.975. At a cutoff of 0.80 or less, FFR-CT had 95.9% accuracy, 93.5% sensitivity, and 97.7% specificity. In 39 lesions with severe calcifications (≥ 400 Agatston units), FFR-CT had AUC of 0.991 and at a cutoff of 0.80, 94.7% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, and 94.9% accuracy. Mean analysis time per patient was 7 minutes 54 seconds. Intraobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.85; bias, -0.01; 95% limits of agreement, -0.12 and 0.10) and interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.94; bias, -0.01; 95% limits of agreement, -0.08 and 0.07) were good to excellent. CONCLUSION. A high-speed on-site deep learning-based FFR-CT algorithm had excellent diagnostic performance for hemodynamically significant stenosis with high reproducibility. CLINICAL IMPACT. The algorithm should facilitate implementation of FFR-CT technology into routine clinical practice.

FFR-CT is extremely useful in detecting hemodynamically significant left-main coronary artery stenosis with right coronary artery hypoplasia: A case report

Left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with a significant increase in cardiac events, and determining its contribution to ischemia is essential. Currently, several noninvasive modalities are available for the ischemic assessment of CAD. In multi-vessel disease, including LMCA disease, the accuracy of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) for detecting myocardial ischemia can be poor. Fractional flow reserve from computed tomography (FFR-CT) has emerged as a promising noninvasive modality that can provide functional myocardial ischemia information. Herein, we describe the case of a 50-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes who presented to the hospital due to intermittent chest pain on exertion. Coronary computed tomography angiography showed right coronary artery hypoplasia, 25 % stenosis in the LMCA, and 75 % stenosis in the left anterior descending. FFR-CT identified myocardial ischemia due to LMCA stenosis, but MPS did not. Invasive coronary angiography with conventional fractional flow reserve was mostly consistent with the results of FFR-CT.

Learning objective

Fractional flow reserve from computed tomography (FFR-CT), which is a novel noninvasive method, can provide absolute, not relative, functional myocardial ischemia information by applying computational fluid dynamics to coronary computed tomography angiography on a lesion-by-lesion basis. FFR-CT can be extremely useful in detecting patients with left main coronary artery stenosis with right coronary artery hypoplasia.

Impact of preceding acetylcholine provocation testing on following coronary physiological assessment during an interventional diagnostic procedure

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test and coronary physiological assessment are useful interventional diagnostic procedures for evaluating ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). However, the appropriate sequential order of the diagnostic procedures has been a matter of debate. We investigated the impact of preceding ACh provocation on following coronary physiological assessment.

METHODS

Patients suspected of INOCA underwent invasive coronary physiological assessment using thermodilution method and were divided into two groups according to the implementation of ACh provocation test. The ACh group was further divided into the positive and negative ACh groups. In the ACh group, intracoronary ACh provocation was performed before the invasive coronary physiological assessment. The main interest of this study was to compare coronary physiological indices among the no ACh, negative ACh, and positive ACh groups.

RESULTS

Of 120 patients, the no ACh, and negative and positive ACh groups included 46 (38.3 %), 36 (30.0 %), and 38 (31.7 %), respectively. Fractional flow reserve was lower in the no ACh group than in the ACh group. Resting mean transit time was significantly longer in the positive ACh group, followed by the no ACh and negative ACh groups (1.22 ± 0.55 vs. 1.00 ± 0.46 vs. 0.74 ± 0.36 s, p < 0.001). Index of microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve did not differ significantly among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preceding ACh provocation influenced following physiological assessment, particularly when ACh test was positive. Further studies are warranted to determine which interventional diagnostic procedure, ACh provocation or physiological assessment, should be preceded in the invasive evaluation of INOCA.

Deferred Versus Performed Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease With Hemodynamic Significance

BACKGROUND

The majority of randomized controlled trials of revascularization decision-making excludes left main coronary artery disease (LMD). Therefore, contemporary clinical outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease and LMD with proven ischemia remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of physiologically significant LMD according to the treatment strategies of revascularization versus revascularization deferral.

METHODS

In this international multicenter registry of stable LMD interrogated with the instantaneous wave-free ratio, patients with physiologically significant ischemia (instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89) were analyzed according to the coronary revascularization (n=151) versus revascularization deferral (n=74). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline clinical characteristics. The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization of left main stem. The secondary end points were as follows: cardiac death or spontaneous LMD-related myocardial infarction; and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization of left main stem.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up period of 2.8 years, the primary end point occurred in 11 patients (14.9%) in the revascularized group and 21 patients (28.4%) in the deferred group (hazard ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.20-0.89]; P=0.023). For the secondary end points, cardiac death or LMD-related myocardial infarction occurred significantly less frequently in the revascularized group (0.0% versus 8.1%; P=0.004). The rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization of left main stem was also significantly lower in the revascularized group (5.4% versus 17.6%; hazard ratio, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.056-0.70]; P=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who underwent revascularization for stable coronary artery disease and physiologically significant LMD determined by instantaneous wave-free ratio, the long-term clinical outcomes were significantly improved as compared with those in whom revascularization was deferred.

Complete revascularization in acute myocardial infarction: a clinical review

In patients with ST segment elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI), multivessel (MV) coronary artery disease is found in approximately 50%, leading to worse clinical outcomes. Recent data have suggested that complete revascularization with MV percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events as compared to culprit vessel-only revascularization. However, the optimal timing of MV intervention, appropriate non-culprit lesion assessment, and the best revascularization strategy in specific subsets such as cardiogenic shock remain to be established. This review article summarizes current evidence on revascularization strategies in patients with acute MI and MV disease.

Factors Associated with Impaired Resistive Reserve Ratio and Microvascular Resistance Reserve

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is described as an important subset of ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease. Resistive reserve ratio (RRR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) have been proposed as novel physiological indices evaluating coronary microvascular dilation function. The aim of this study was to explore factors associated with impaired RRR and MRR. Coronary physiological indices were invasively evaluated in the left anterior descending coronary artery using the thermodilution method in patients suspected of CMD. CMD was defined as a coronary flow reserve <2.0 and/or index of microcirculatory resistance ≥25. Of 117 patients, 26 (24.1%) had CMD. RRR (3.1 ± 1.9 vs. 6.2 ± 3.2, p < 0.001) and MRR (3.4 ± 1.9 vs. 6.9 ± 3.5, p < 0.001) were lower in the CMD group. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, RRR (area under the curve 0.84, p < 0.001) and MRR (area under the curve 0.85, p < 0.001) were both predictive of the presence of CMD. In the multivariable analysis, previous myocardial infarction, lower hemoglobin, higher brain natriuretic peptide levels, and intracoronary nicorandil were identified as factors associated with lower RRR and MRR. In conclusion, the presence of previous myocardial infarction, anemia, and heart failure was associated with impaired coronary microvascular dilation function. RRR and MRR may be useful to identify patients with CMD.

Association of the severity of vascular damage with discordance between the fractional flow reserve and non-hyperemic pressure ratios

BACKGROUND

While there is a discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs) in some cases, the mechanisms underlying these discordances have not yet been fully clarified. We examined whether vascular damage as assessed by measurement of the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), a marker of arterial stiffness, or ankle brachial pressure index (ABI), a marker of atherosclerotic arterial stenosis, might be associated with their discordances.

METHODS

FFR and NHPRs were measured in 283 consecutive patients (69 ± 10 years old). Based on previously established cut-off values of the two markers (i.e. +/- = FFR ≤/> 0.80 or =NHPRs ≤/> 0.89), the study participants were divided into four groups (the + and - signs denoting "predictive of significant stenosis" and "not predictive of significant stenosis," respectively): the FFR+/NHPRs+ group (n = 124), FFR-/NHPRs+ group (n = 16), FFR+/NHPRs- group(n = 65), and FFR-/NHPRs- group (n = 78). The baPWV and ABI were also measured in all the participants, and values of <2000 cm/s and ≥1.00 of the baPWV and ABI, respectively, were considered as representing relatively less advanced atherosclerotic systemic vascular damage.

RESULTS

The prevalence of subjects with ABI ≥1.00 was higher in the FFR+/NHPRs- group than in the FFR-/NHPRs- group (p < 0.05). When the study subjects were divided into 2 groups, namely, the FFR+/NHPRs- group and the combined group, the prevalence of ABI ≥1.00 and that of baPWV <2000 cm/s were higher in the FFR+/NHPRs- group as compared with those in the combined group (p < 0.05). The results of binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ABI ≥1.00 was associated with a significant odds ratio (2.34, p < 0.05) for the FFR+/NHPRs- discordance.

CONCLUSION

The FFR+/NHPRs- discordance appears to be observed in patients with relatively less advanced atherosclerotic systemic vascular damage. Thus, ABI ≥1.00 may be a marker of the presence of the FFR+/NHPRs- discordance.

Discordance between fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio in patients with severe aortic stenosis: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) occurs in approximately 20 % of cases. However, no studies have reported the discordance in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic discordance between FFR and iFR in patients with severe AS.

METHODS

We examined 140 consecutive patients with severe AS (164 intermediate coronary artery stenosis vessels). FFR and iFR were calculated in four quadrants based on threshold FFR and iFR values of ≤0.8 and ≤0.89, respectively (Group 1: iFR >0.89, FFR >0.80; Group 2: iFR ≤0.89, FFR >0.80; Group 3: iFR >0.89, FFR ≤0.80; and Group 4: iFR ≤0.89, FFR ≤0.80). Concordant groups were Groups 1 and 4, and discordant groups were Groups 2 and 3. Positive and negative discordant groups were Groups 3 and 2, respectively.

RESULTS

The median (Q1, Q3) FFR and iFR were 0.84 (0.76, 0.88) and 0.85 (0.76, 0.91), respectively. Discordance was observed in 48 vessels (29.3 %). In the discordant group, negative discordance (Group 2: iFR ≤0.89 and FFR >0.80) was predominant (45 cases, 93.6 %). Multivariate analysis showed that the left anterior descending artery [odds ratio (OR), 3.88; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.54-9.79, p = 0.004] and peak velocity ≥5.0 m/s (OR, 3.21; 95%CI: 1.36-7.57, p = 0.008) were independently associated with negative discordance (FFR >0.8 and iFR ≤0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe AS, discordance between FFR and iFR was predominantly negative and observed in 29.3 % of vessels. The left anterior descending artery and peak velocity ≥5.0 m/s were independently associated with negative discordance.

Treatment strategies of acute myocardial infarction: updates on revascularization, pharmacological therapy, and beyond

Owing to recent advances in early reperfusion strategies, pharmacological therapy, standardized care, and the identification of vulnerable patient subsets, the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction has improved. However, there is still considerable room for improvement. This review article summarizes the latest evidence concerning clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Comparative study of fractional flow reserve and diastolic pressure ratio using a guidewire with a sensor for measuring intravascular pressure

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation and diagnostic agreement between diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in a Japanese real-world setting.

DESIGN

Prospective multicenter observational study.

METHODS

This study included 100 patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis at 4 Japanese hospitals. For these lesions, FFR and dPR were measured using a guidewire with a sensor and a monitor to measure intravascular pressure. The correlation and diagnostic agreement between FFR and dPR were assessed. When both FFR and dPR were negative or positive, the results were considered to be concordant. When one was positive and the other was negative, the result was regarded as discordant (positive discordance, FFR > 0.80 and dPR ≤ 0.89; negative discordance, FFR ≤ 0.80 and dPR > 0.89).

RESULTS

Overall, the FFR and dPR were well-correlated (R = 0.841). FFR and dPR were concordant in 89% of cases (concordant normal, 43%; concordant abnormal, 46%) and discordant in 11% (positive discordance, 7%; negative discordance, 4%). No significant difference was observed in the rate of concordant results between patients with and without diabetes mellitus. The diagnostic concordance rate was significantly different among the 3 coronary arteries (right coronary artery, 93.3%; left anterior descending artery, 93.2%; and left circumflex artery, 58.3%; P = .001). Additionally, the rate of concordant results tended to be higher when using intravenous administration of adenosine than when using intracoronary bolus injection of nicorandil (adenosine, 95.1%; nicorandil, 84.7%; P = .103).

CONCLUSION

We found that dPR was highly correlated with FFR, and diagnostic discordance was observed in 11% of the lesions. Several factors, including lesion location and medication for hyperemia, may cause the diagnostic discordance between dPR and FFR.

Validation of pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve using invasive coronary physiologic assessment

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) represents entire coronary compensatory capacity. While CFR assessment is recommended to identify patients at an increased risk of cardiovascular events and coronary microvascular dysfunction, invasive CFR measurement is often technically challenging. Although not well validated yet, pressure-bounded CFR (pbCFR) has been proposed as a simple surrogate to estimate impaired CFR. In this study, we evaluated coronary physiological characteristics of low pbCFR using detailed invasive assessment. Invasive physiological assessment including resting ratio of distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure (Pd/Pa), fractional flow reserve (FFR), resting and hyperemic mean transit time, index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), CFR, resistive reserve ratio, and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) was performed in 107 patients in the left anterior descending coronary artery. pbCFR was calculated only with resting Pd/Pa and FFR. Patients were divided into low pbCFR and non-low pbCFR groups. Of 107 patients, 50 (46.7%) had low pbCFR. FFR (0.90 ± 0.05 vs. 0.83 ± 0.05, p < 0.001), hyperemic mean transit time (0.27 ± 0.17 vs. 0.21 ± 0.12, p = 0.04), and IMR (20.4 ± 13.2 vs. 15.0 ± 9.1, p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the low pbCFR group than their counterpart. While directly measured CFR did not differ significantly (4.4 ± 2.3 vs. 5.1 ± 2.8, p = 0.18), MRR was lower in the low pbCFR group (5.4 ± 3.0 vs. 6.8 ± 3.8, p = 0.047). The rates of CFR < 2.0 and IMR ≥ 25 were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In conclusion, although CFR did not differ significantly, IMR and MRR were impaired in patients with low pbCFR, suggesting pbCFR as a potential surrogate of coronary microvascular function in clinical practice.

Relation of hyperemic response during fractional flow reserve measurement to coronary flow reserve

BACKGROUND

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) represents entire coronary compensatory capacity, while fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a standard to evaluate functional severity of epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD). ΔFFR, a decrease in a ratio of mean distal coronary pressure to aortic pressure (Pd/Pa) at rest to FFR, is conceptually associated with coronary microvascular function. This study aimed to evaluate the relation of ΔFFR to CFR in patients with stable CAD.

METHODS

We performed resting Pd/Pa and FFR measurements in a total of 309 vessels with intermediate coronary artery stenosis in 242 patients. ΔFFR was defined as (resting Pd/Pa - FFR), and pressure bounded-CFR was calculated to estimate low CFR. Vessels were divided as the low CFR and non-low CFR groups.

RESULTS

Of 309 vessels, low CFR was observed in 101 (32.7 %). While FFR values were similar (0.78 ± 0.11 vs. 0.78 ± 0.09, p = 0.84), resting Pd/Pa (0.85 ± 0.08 vs. 0.93 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) and ΔFFR (0.07 ± 0.06 vs. 0.15 ± 0.06, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the low CFR group than in the non-low CFR group. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that ΔFFR was predictive for low CFR (area under the curve 0.84, best cut-off value 0.08, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified lower ΔFFR, the left anterior descending coronary artery, and lower hemoglobin and higher brain natriuretic peptide levels as factors associated with low CFR.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable CAD, lower ΔFFR was significantly associated with low CFR in intermediate coronary stenosis in patients with stable CAD. ΔFFR may be a simple, practical, and useful surrogate to identify patients with impaired CFR.