Safety of Early Administration of Apixaban on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Large Vessel Occlusion

One-year morbidity and mortality in patients treated with standard-dose and low-dose apixaban after acute large vessel occlusion stroke

Although low-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended for patients at high risk of bleeding complications, it remains unclear whether the dose reduction in real-world setting is also appropriate in patients after large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. This study hypothesized that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and LVO receiving low-dose DOACs have an increased risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic events. The study aimed to assess 1 year morbidity and mortality in patients treated with standard-dose and low-dose apixaban after LVO stroke. A post hoc analysis was performed using the acute LVO registry data, which enrolled patients with AF and LVO who received apixaban within 14 days of stroke onset. The incidences of ischemic events (ischemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, and systemic embolism), major bleeding events, and death from any cause were compared between patients receiving standard- and low-dose apixaban. Of 643 patients diagnosed with LVO, 307 (47.7%) received low-dose apixaban. After adjustment for clinically relevant variables, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of ischemic events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-6.02), major bleeding events (aHR: 1.17, 95% CI 0.50-2.73), and death from any cause (aHR: 1.95, 95% CI 0.78-4.89) between patients receiving standard- and low-dose apixaban. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of ischemic events, major bleeding events, or death from any cause between patients with AF and LVO receiving standard- and low-dose apixaban.

Effect of edaravone on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute large vessel occlusion on apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Edaravone administration was associated with lower incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, its protective effect on sICH in patients with LVO who receive direct oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the effect of edaravone administration on the incidence of sICH in patients with acute LVO receiving apixaban for NVAF.

METHODS

A Japanese multicenter registry of apixaban on clinical outcome of the patients with LVO or stenosis (ALVO study) included patients who were admitted within 24 h after stroke onset and were received apixaban within 14 days of stroke onset. Patients were divided into two groups according to edaravone administration (Edaravone and No-Edaravone groups). The incidence of sICH within one year and infarct growth before apixaban administration were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

Of the 686 enrolled patients, 622 were included and edaravone was administered to 407 (65.4%). The incidences of sICH in Edaravone and No-Edaravone groups were 1.3% and 5.0%, respectively (p = 0.01). The inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of Edaravone group for sICH within one year was 0.36 (0.15-0.80) compared to No-Edaravone group. The incidences of infarct growth in Edaravone and No-Edaravone groups were 35.3% and 42.0%, respectively (p = 0.13). IPTW HR (95% CIs) for infarct growth was 0.76 (0.60-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Edaravone administration was associated with a lower incidence of sICH in patients with LVO and NVAF who administrated apixaban.

Impact of thrombocytopenia on hemorrhagic complications after endovascular therapy for acute large vessel occlusion: Sub-analysis of RESCUE-Japan registry 2

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment (EVT) for patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and concurrent thrombocytopenia raises concerns about hemorrhagic complications. We examined the association between thrombocytopenia and clinical outcomes after EVT.

METHODS

This is a sub-analysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2, a nationwide registry that enrolled 2420 consecutive acute LVO patients. We evaluated the clinical outcomes in patients who underwent EVT according to their platelet count on admission (Moderate/Severe, < 100 × 10⁹ /L; Mild, 100 to ≤150 × 10⁹/L; Normal, ≥ 150 × 10⁹/L). The outcomes included any and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after EVT, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days.

RESULTS

Of 1268 patients who underwent EVT, the Moderate/Severe and Mild groups consisted of 41 (3.2%), and 193 (15.2%) patients. Any ICH occurred in 37%, 35%, and 24% of Moderate/Severe, Mild, and Normal group patients, respectively, and the adjusted ORs (95% CIs) were 1.50 (0.71-3.18) for Moderate/Severe and 1.87 (1.28-2.73) for Mild, compared to the Normal group (p for trend = 0.004). Symptomatic ICH increased with the severity of thrombocytopenia (9.8% vs 3.6% vs 2.1%), and adjusted ORs were 4.43 (1.16-17.0) in Moderate/Severe and 1.85 (0.71-4.86) in Mild (p for trend = 0.10). Mortality was significantly associated with the severity of thrombocytopenia (p for trend = 0.005), and adjusted ORs were 3.26 (1.29-8.26) in the Moderate/Severe and 2.76 (1.58-4.84) in the Mild groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombocytopenia in LVO patients was not rare and associated with the incidence and manifestation of ICH after EVT.

Contemporary Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapies for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Narrative Review of Current Literature and Guidelines

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The annual incidence of new or recurrent stroke is approximately 795,000 cases per year in the United States, of which 87% are ischemic in nature. In addition to the management of modifiable high-risk factors to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, antithrombotic agents (antiplatelets and anticoagulants) play an important role in secondary stroke prevention. This review will discuss the published literature on the use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants in secondary prevention of acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA), including their pharmacology, efficacy, and adverse effects. We will also highlight the role of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary stroke prevention, along with supporting literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin or clopidogrel reduces the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA. However, as shown in recent trials, short-term DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 21-30 days is more effective than SAPT in patients with minor acute non-cardioembolic stroke or high-risk TIA. Although short-term DAPT is highly effective in preventing recurrent stroke, a more prolonged course can increase bleeding risks without additional benefit. DAPT for 90 days, followed by aspirin monotherapy for patients with large vessel intracranial atherosclerotic disease, is suitable for secondary stroke prevention. However, patients need to be monitored for both minor (e.g., bruising) and major (e.g., intracranial) bleeding complications. Conversely, oral warfarin and newer direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban are the agents of choice for secondary stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular cardioembolic strokes. DOACs may be preferred over warfarin due to decreased bleeding risks, including ICH, lack of need for international normalized ratio monitoring, no dietary restrictions, and limited drug-drug interactions. The choice between different antiplatelets and anticoagulants for prevention of ischemic stroke depends on the underlying stroke mechanism, cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphisms, bleeding risk profile, compliance, drug tolerance, and drug resistance. Physicians must carefully weigh each patient's relative benefits and bleeding risks before initiating an antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatment regimen. Further studies are warranted to study the optimal duration of DAPT in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis since the benefit is most pronounced in the short term while the bleeding risk remains high during the extended duration of therapy.

Antithrombotic dilemmas in stroke medicine: new data, unsolved challenges

Antithrombotic therapy is a key element of secondary prevention in patients who have had an ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. However, its use in clinical practice is not always straightforward. This review provides an update on certain difficult scenarios in antithrombotic management, with a focus on recent clinical trials and large observational studies. We discuss the approach to patients with an indication for antithrombotic treatment who also have clinical or radiological evidence of previous intracranial bleeding, patients with indications for both anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatment, and patients in whom antithrombotic treatment fails to prevent stroke. We also review the timing of anticoagulation initiation after cardioembolic stroke, and the use of antithrombotics in patients with asymptomatic cerebrovascular disease. Despite a wealth of new evidence, numerous uncertainties remain and we highlight ongoing trials addressing these.

Reperfusion Therapy Brings Apixaban Administration Forward in Patients with Nonvalvular Arterial Fibrillation with Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion or Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

The initiation of anticoagulant administration after large vessel occlusion (LVO) or stenosis with nonvalvular arterial fibrillation (NAVF) is controversial. We evaluate the timing of anticoagulation and its relationship with clinical factors.

METHODS

We enrolled 595 anterior circulation LVO or stenosis with NAVF cases from 38 stroke centers. Laboratory data; activities of daily living; the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS); the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score; occluded artery; treatment methods; date of the initiation of apixaban administration and outcome were recorded. Multivariate analyses were performed after univariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median start of apixaban administration after the stroke was 2 days (interquartile range, 1-5; range, 0-14). Multivariate analysis of variance showed that non-internal carotid artery occlusion (F value 4.60), reperfusion therapy (31.1), high ASPECTS (6.27) before anticoagulant intake, and absence of intracranial hemorrhage (12.9) were significantly correlated with early apixaban administration. Multiple logistic regression analysis for independent living at 90 days after the stroke showed significant factors: aging (odds, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.97); male (odds, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.79); prestroke independence (odds, 20.7; 95% CI, 6.48-93.9); number of white blood cells (odds, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00); non-internal carotid artery occlusion; NIHSS score at 72 hours after the stroke (odds 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96); ASPECTS before apixaban intake (odds, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31) and initiation of apixaban (odds, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Early administration of apixaban is induced by nonsevere infarction, reperfusion therapy or none of intracranial hemorrhage and it correlates with an independent long-term outcome.

Net clinical benefit of anticoagulant therapy from a neurologist's perspective: A review

In this article the concept of "net clinical benefit" (NCB) is considered in the context of stroke, the role of direct oral anticoagulants in secondary prevention of cardioembolic stroke and NCB from their prescription. Practical aspects of NCB evaluation from the neurologist's point of view are presented, taking into account such factors as stroke duration and severity, features of neurological deficit (severity of residual limitations, dysphagia, motor disorders and risk of falls), neuroimaging characteristics of stroke (focal size and hemorrhagic transformation) and concomitant neurological diseases (epilepsy and dementia). In all these situations, the use of oral anticoagulants has a significant clinical benefit, which justifies the inadmissibility of refusal to prescribe them.

Difficult issues in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a neurologist's point of view

The article evaluates recent perspectives about the role of oral anticoagulants in the secondary prevention of cardioembolic stroke. The timing of prescribing drugs for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack is discussed in accordance with current clinical guidelines and the results of clinical trials. The issues of prescribing oral anticoagulants in some problematic situations, such as the elderly and senile age, reperfusion therapy, presence of hemorrhagic transformation, combined atherosclerosis of major head and neck arteries, cerebral microangiopathy, history of intracerebral hemorrhage, cryptogenic stroke, and low patient compliance are considered. Finally, an anticoagulant therapy algorithm in the acute period of cardioembolic stroke is presented.

Effect of prior antiplatelet therapy on large vessel occlusion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation newly initiated on apixaban

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the effect of prior antiplatelet therapy on large vessel occlusion (LVO) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) newly initiated on apixaban.

METHODS

Patients with acute LVO with acute stroke due to NVAF or stenosis with NVAF started on apixaban within 14 days of onset were enrolled. We compared incidence of major bleeding, cerebral hemorrhage, ischemic events, cerebral infarction, and all-cause mortality between patients with and without prior antiplatelet therapy for acute LVO. We also compared these events between patients who continued antiplatelet therapy after onset (continued group) and those who discontinued it (discontinued group). Hazard ratios were estimated after adjusting for confounders; interaction was evaluated considering intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular treatment (EVT) according to major bleeding.

RESULTS

The study comprised 686 eligible patients (excluded [n = 194]; enrolled [n = 492]). The antiplatelet group consisted of older patients (mean: 79 vs. 76 years; p = 0.006) and had a higher cumulative incidence of major bleeding (7.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.003). The incidence of ischemic events and all-cause mortality was similar between the groups. Among the 109 patients in the antiplatelet group, the cumulative incidence of major bleeding, ischemic events, and all-cause mortality was comparable between continued group (n = 26) and discontinued group (n = 83). There were no significant differences between groups with and without IVT/EVT. However, major bleeding occured more frequently in the antiplatelet group without IVT.

CONCLUSION

Prior antiplatelet therapy for LVO in patients with NVAF newly initiated on apixaban was associated with major bleeding, which was more frequent in the antiplatelet group without IVT.