Effect of edaravone on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute large vessel occlusion on apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Edaravone administration was associated with lower incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, its protective effect on sICH in patients with LVO who receive direct oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the effect of edaravone administration on the incidence of sICH in patients with acute LVO receiving apixaban for NVAF.

METHODS

A Japanese multicenter registry of apixaban on clinical outcome of the patients with LVO or stenosis (ALVO study) included patients who were admitted within 24 h after stroke onset and were received apixaban within 14 days of stroke onset. Patients were divided into two groups according to edaravone administration (Edaravone and No-Edaravone groups). The incidence of sICH within one year and infarct growth before apixaban administration were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

Of the 686 enrolled patients, 622 were included and edaravone was administered to 407 (65.4%). The incidences of sICH in Edaravone and No-Edaravone groups were 1.3% and 5.0%, respectively (p = 0.01). The inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of Edaravone group for sICH within one year was 0.36 (0.15-0.80) compared to No-Edaravone group. The incidences of infarct growth in Edaravone and No-Edaravone groups were 35.3% and 42.0%, respectively (p = 0.13). IPTW HR (95% CIs) for infarct growth was 0.76 (0.60-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Edaravone administration was associated with a lower incidence of sICH in patients with LVO and NVAF who administrated apixaban.

Safety of Apixaban Monotherapy for Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation-Related Acute Stroke with Intra-/Extracranial Artery Stenosis

INTRODUCTION

We investigated whether apixaban is safe for the prevention of further adverse events in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with intra-/extracranial artery stenosis (Stenosis group) compared with acute large vessel occlusion without intra-/extracranial artery stenosis (No stenosis group). We also examined whether combination therapy using apixaban and antiplatelet is safe.

METHODS

ALVO (Apixaban on clinical outcome of patients with Large Vessel Occlusion [LVO] or stenosis) was a historical and prospective multicenter registry at 38 centers in Japan. Patients with NVAF and acute LVO or stenosis who received apixaban within 14 days after onset were included. We conducted the post hoc analysis using the ALVO dataset. We compared patients with stenosis versus those without stenosis in terms of the primary outcome, which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, major bleeding events, and ischemic events 365 days after onset.

RESULTS

Of the 662 patients, 54 (8.2%) patients were classified into the Stenosis group, and 104 patients of the total (16%) reached the primary outcome. The cumulative incidence of primary outcome was not significantly different between the No stenosis and the Stenosis groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-2.4; p = 0.52). Even after adjustment for predictive clinical variates, no significant difference in the primary endpoint between the No stenosis and the Stenosis groups was shown (adjusted HR 1.2, 95% CI: 0.59-2.5; p = 0.60). Fifty patients (7.6%) used an antiplatelet with apixaban. Among the Stenosis group patients, the cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was significantly higher among patients treated with an antiplatelet and apixaban (HR 3.5, 95% CI: 1.0-12; p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Apixaban monotherapy appears safe for the prevention of further adverse events in the Stenosis group patients similar to the No stenosis group patients. Concomitant use of an antiplatelet might not be favorable in patients with stenosis.

Thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion in posterior and anterior circulation: a single institutional retrospective observational study

Purpose

Thrombectomy has been the gold standard therapy for anterior circulation occlusion; however, studies regarding thrombectomy in posterior circulation are lacking. In this study, we compared the efficiency of thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion between the posterior and anterior circulation at a single institution.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion at our institution between August 2014 and April 2021. Differences in the clinical background, time course, and treatment technique and outcomes were evaluated between anterior and posterior circulation occlusions.

Results

Overall, 353 patients (225 men and 128 women) were included: 314 patients had anterior circulation occlusion and 39 patients had posterior circulation occlusion. Between the patients with anterior and posterior circulation occlusions, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (16 [12–21] vs. 29 [19–34], respectively, p < 0.001), door-to-puncture time (65 [45–99] vs. 99 [51–121] min, respectively, p = 0.018), and mortality (22 [7%] vs. 8 [20.5%] patients, respectively, p = 0.010) were significantly different; however, favorable outcome was not significantly different.

Conclusion

Higher NIHSS score, delayed treatment, and higher mortality were observed in posterior circulation occlusion than in anterior circulation occlusion; successful reperfusion and favorable outcomes were similar between them. Similar favorable outcomes and reperfusion ratio to the anterior circulation might be achieved also in the posterior circulation; however, delayed treatment and the optimal first-pass strategy might need further improvement.

Predictors of Catastrophic Outcome after Endovascular Thrombectomy in Elderly Patients with Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke

Objective

Avoiding a catastrophic outcome may be a more realistic goal than achieving functional independence in the treatment of acute stroke in octogenarians. This study aimed to investigate predictors of catastrophic outcome in elderly patients after an endovascular thrombectomy with an acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO).

Materials and Methods

Data from 82 patients aged ≥ 80 years, who were treated with thrombectomy for acute anterior circulation LVO, were analyzed. The association between clinical/imaging variables and catastrophic outcomes was assessed. A catastrophic outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 4–6 at 90 days.

Results

Successful reperfusion was achieved in 61 patients (74.4%), while 47 patients (57.3%) had a catastrophic outcome. The 90-day mortality rate of the treated patients was 15.9% (13/82). The catastrophic outcome group had a significantly lower baseline diffusion-weighted imaging-Alberta stroke program early CT score (DWI-ASPECTS) (7 vs. 8, p = 0.014) and a longer procedure time (42 minutes vs. 29 minutes, p = 0.031) compared to the non-catastrophic outcome group. Successful reperfusion was significantly less frequent in the catastrophic outcome group (63.8% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.011) compared to the non-catastrophic outcome group. In a binary logistic regression analysis, DWI-ASPECTS (odds ratio [OR], 0.709; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.524–0.960; p = 0.026) and successful reperfusion (OR, 0.242; 95% CI, 0.071–0.822; p = 0.023) were independent predictors of a catastrophic outcome.

Conclusion

Baseline infarct size and reperfusion status were independently associated with a catastrophic outcome after endovascular thrombectomy in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with acute anterior circulation LVO.

Safety of Early Administration of Apixaban on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Large Vessel Occlusion

Early administration of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is a concern, as endovascular therapy (EVT) became highly utilized. We conducted a historical and prospective multicenter registry at 38 centers in Japan from July 2016 to February 2018. Patients aged ≥ 20 years with NVAF and acute LVO or stenosis who received apixaban within 14 days from onset were included. We compared patients who received apixaban < 48 h (Early group) and ≥ 48 h (Late group) after onset in terms of the primary outcome (a composite of ischemic events, major bleeding events, and all-cause deaths). The secondary outcomes were each component of the primary outcome. Among the 686 patients, the median time from onset to administration was 2.5 days (range, 0–14; Early 263, Late 423). The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-ASPECTS) were significantly higher in the Early group than in the Late group. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and EVT were more utilized in the Early group (rt-PA 46% vs. 35%, p = 0.003; EVT 62% vs. 46%, p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of primary outcome was similar between groups (ischemic events: Early 1.9% vs. Late 0.5% at 30 days; 3.5% vs. 0.7% at 90 days, major bleeding 3.4% vs. 2.9% at 30 days; 5.0% vs. 3.4% at 90 days). Early administration of apixaban (< 48 h), after onset of acute LVO in patients with NVAF, was generally safe compared with those who received it Late (≥ 48 h). http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02818868 (June 30, 2016)