Evaluating the Predictive Ability of Initial Staging F-18 FDG PET/CT for the Prognosis of Non-Hodgkin Malignant Lymphoma Patients Who Underwent Stem Cell Transplantation

Value of baseline and end of chemotherapy 18F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric patients with Burkitt lymphoma

The aim of this study was to analyze whether the baseline metabolic parameters of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric patients with Burkitt lymphoma (BL) can predict treatment response and prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed 68 pediatric patients with BL who underwent PET/CT before treatment. PET images were analyzed semi-quantitatively by measuring the maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax), total metabolic tumor volume (tMTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Survival curves were plotted according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the relation between potential variables and outcomes. tMTV and TLG were significantly lower in patients with complete response compared with those with partial response at the end of treatment. PET metabolic parameters (tMTV and TLG) were the independent prognostic values for outcome. TMTV and TLG were significantly connected with treatment response and prognosis in pediatric with BL.

Early Interim Chemotherapy Response Evaluation by F-18 FDG PET/CT in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) after one cycle of standard chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was assessed. Prospectively enrolled 51 patients had four PET/CT studies using the same protocol and system: at baseline and after one, three, and six cycles of chemotherapy (PET0, PET1, PET3, PET6). The PET1 and PET6 Deauville five-point score (D5PS) agreed in 60.8%, while PET3 and PET6 D5PS agreed in 90.2%. The absolute and percent changes of peak standard uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak) compared to baseline were significantly different between PET1 and PET3 (p = 0.001, p < 0.001) and PET1 and PET6 (p = 0.002, p = 0.001), but not between PET3 and PET6 (p = 0.276, p = 0.181). The absolute SULpeak from PET1 predicted treatment failure with accuracy of 78.4% (area under the curve 0.73, p = 0.023). D5PS, SULpeak, and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were not statistically different between responders versus non-responders, or the one year disease-free versus relapse groups. D5PS and PERCIST responses showed 100% agreement at end-of-therapy. In conclusion, the responses after three and six cycles of therapy showed high degree of agreement. D5PS or MTV after one cycle of chemotherapy could not predict response or one-year disease-free status, but the SULpeak from PET1 was associated with response to first line therapy in DLBCL. Deauville and PERCIST criteria show high concordance.