1
|
Hamilton-Reeves JM, Johnson CN, Hand LK, Bechtel MD, Robertson HL, Michel C, Metcalf M, Chalise P, Mahan NJ, Mirza M, Lee EK, Sullivan DK, Klemp JR, Befort CA, Parker WP, Gibbs HD, Demark-Wahnefried W, Thrasher JB. Feasibility of a Weight Management Program Tailored for Overweight Men with Localized Prostate Cancer - A Pilot Study. Nutr Cancer 2020; 73:2671-2686. [PMID: 33295204 PMCID: PMC8371995 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1856890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overweight men with prostate cancer are more likely to suffer from recurrence and death following prostatectomy compared with healthy weight men. This study tested the feasibility of delivering a comprehensive program to foster weight loss before and weight maintenance after surgery in overweight men with localized prostate cancer. METHODS Twenty overweight men scheduled for prostatectomy elected either the intervention (n = 15) or the nonintervention (n = 5). Anthropometrics, biomarkers, diet quality, nutrition literacy, quality of life, and long-term follow-up were assessed in both groups. RESULTS The intervention led to 5.55 kg of weight loss including 3.88 kg of fat loss from baseline to surgery (mean = 8.3 weeks). The intervention significantly increased fiber, protein, fruit, nut, and vegetable intake; and decreased trans fats intake during weight loss. The intervention significantly reduced insulin, C-peptide, systolic blood pressure, leptin:adiponectin ratio, and visceral adiposity compared to the nonintervention. Post-surgically, weight loss was maintained. Changes in lipid profiles, nutrition literacy, and follow-up were not statistically significant in either group. CONCLUSION Significant weight loss (≥5%) is feasible with a coaching intervention in overweight men preparing for prostatectomy and is associated with favorable cardiometabolic effects. This study is registered under NCT02252484 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill M Hamilton-Reeves
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- Department of Dietetics & Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Chelsea N Johnson
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Lauren K Hand
- Department of Dietetics & Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Misty D Bechtel
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Hilary L Robertson
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Carrie Michel
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Meredith Metcalf
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Prabhakar Chalise
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Nicholas J Mahan
- Department of Dietetics & Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Moben Mirza
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Eugene K Lee
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Debra K Sullivan
- Department of Dietetics & Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Jennifer R Klemp
- Breast Cancer Prevention Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, Kansas, USA
| | - Christie A Befort
- Department of Preventative Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - William P Parker
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Heather D Gibbs
- Department of Dietetics & Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - J Brantley Thrasher
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schleper A, Sullivan DK, Thrasher JB, Holzbeierlein JM, Klemp J, Befort C, Hamilton-Reeves JM. Weight Management to Reduce Prostate Cancer Risk: A Survey of Men's Needs and Interests. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 5:43-52. [PMID: 27547287 PMCID: PMC4991822 DOI: 10.5539/cco.v5n1p43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Obese men have a higher rate of prostate cancer-related death than non-obese men, and obesity increases the risk of prostate cancer progression and biochemical recurrence. The purpose of this study was to assess needs and interests of men for a technology-driven weight loss intervention to reduce prostate cancer risk. We distributed a survey collecting demographic characteristics, health history, exercise and eating habits (and perception of those habits), current and prior attempts of health behavior change, and technology use. Survey answers were summarized by count and percent of total respondents. Completed surveys (N = 109) described men with a family history of prostate cancer (25%), a history of elevated prostate specific antigen (26%), and prostate cancer survivors (22%). We compared body mass index (BMI) to perception of weight; overweight and obese men perceived their weight as more normal than their BMI category suggests. Most men reported their diet needed minor improvement (74%), and 65% of men reported they are either currently trying to lose weight or interested in weight loss. Most respondents access the internet (92%), while text messaging (60%) and smartphone application use (40%) are less frequent, especially in men over 60. Our results revealed a need and willingness for lifestyle modification and suggest a need for evidence-based weight loss strategies and for addressing the misperception of weight status. A male-tailored intervention that implements technology could improve energy balance, hold men accountable to healthy behavior change, and promote dietary patterns in order to reduce prostate cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Schleper
- Department of Dietetics & Nutrition, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mailstop 4013, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA
| | - Debra K Sullivan
- Department of Dietetics & Nutrition, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mailstop 4013, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA
| | - J Brantley Thrasher
- Department of Urology Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mail Stop 3016, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein
- Department of Urology Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mail Stop 3016, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA
| | - Jennifer Klemp
- Breast Cancer Prevention Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, 2330 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Mail Stop 3015, Westwood, Kansas 66205, USA
| | - Christie Befort
- Department of Preventative Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mail Stop 1008, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA
| | - Jill M Hamilton-Reeves
- Department of Dietetics & Nutrition, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mailstop 4013, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA ; Department of Urology Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mail Stop 3016, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA
| |
Collapse
|