Level of Knowledge and Needs on Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Aged Male Patients with Cancer

"I wanna know what to expect" - Care needs regarding sexual and reproductive health after cancer in adolescence and young adulthood (AYA) and recommendations for providers

PURPOSE

To assess care needs related to sexual and reproductive health of patients and survivors diagnosed with cancer during adolescence and young adulthood (AYA).

METHODS

Participants (N = 190) were predominantly female (87.4%) and diagnosed with cancer between age 12-39 years. Common diagnoses included breast cancer (37.1%) or leukemia/lymphoma (27.2%). Cancer patients/survivors completed an online survey, which assessed care needs regarding sexual health and fertility/reproductive health. They provided written open answers, which were qualitatively analyzed.

RESULTS

Care needs related to sexual health varied and included a need for more information about possible effects on sexual health, which will enable patients/survivors to better anticipate (physical and mental) side effects of cancer on sexual health. AYA patients/survivors need support from providers who normalize the topic of sex, who offer guidance in coping with numerous questions, who provide resources and practical tips and tricks, and who refer to specialists if needed. Participants would like providers to initiate conversations and communicate openly and honestly without taboo, bias, or shame. Care needs regarding reproductive health included needing support in navigating reproduction after cancer, while unmet information needs were central. This included needing information about fertility status and assessment options, reproduction/contraceptives, the safety of pregnancies, and the (im)possibility of alternatives to biological parenthood.

CONCLUSION

Communication is key in informing and supporting AYA cancer patients and survivors regarding their sexual and reproductive health. Providers should assess individual patients'/survivors' needs and tailor information that is tangible accordingly. Additional recommendations for healthcare providers are presented.

[Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa or testicular tissue for fertility preservation]

Loss of reproductive capacity due to treatments for malignant or non-malignant diseases or even as a result of diseases themselves significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Cryopreservation of sperm from ejaculate is a well-established procedure for preserving the fertility of these patients and thus improving their quality of life in the long term. If cryopreservation of sperm from ejaculate is not possible, either because ejaculation cannot occur or no sperm can be found in the ejaculate, the preferred treatment option is (microsurgical) testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). Testicular sperm and ejaculated spermatozoa can be cryopreserved and later used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. The use of cryopreserved sperm for fertility treatment does not carry an increased risk of malformations in the offspring. If gonadotoxic therapy is necessary in pre- or early pubertal boys, the only option to preserve fertility in the long term is to cryopreserve spermatogonial stem cells from testicular tissue as part of the Androprotect© network. This is an experimental approach which has been available since 2012 across Germany and which is accompanied by intensive scientific work ( www.androprotect.de ).

Knowledge and intentions to use fertility preservation among urban Chinese cancer patients: A study from Hong Kong

OBJECTIVE

To assess the knowledge levels and fertility preservation (FP) intentions of urban Chinese cancer patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on Hong Kong Chinese male and female cancer patients aged 18-54 years (N = 325) who were recruited by a local non-governmental organization for cancer patients between July 2020 to January 2021. Patients completed a self-administered questionnaire on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions to use FP services/seek FP-related information. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the correlates of intention to seek additional FP information and intention to undergo FP treatments.

RESULTS

Although cancer patients demonstrated a good knowledge of the available FP treatment options, they were less knowledgeable about the legal restrictions of these procedures. Only one in seven cancer patients first became aware of FP through a health provider and the majority of cancer patients felt they did not have adequate knowledge about FP to make informed FP decisions at the current time. Yet, over one-third of cancer patients would consider FP options even if their cancer or cancer treatment had < 5% chance of causing infertility, and 13.4% of females and 14.6% of males would delay their cancer treatment by ≥ 3 months to undergo FP procedures. However, for both sexes, the main perceived barrier to obtaining FP was its financial cost. Patients with older-aged spouses were less likely to seek FP treatments or seek more information about FP.

CONCLUSION

There is an unmet need for more FP information and FP services for reproductive-aged cancer patients in East Asian populations. Greater integration of FP services into cancer treatment requires a reduction of cost barriers, greater provision of timely FP information, and improved referral systems.

Preservation of male fertility in patients undergoing pelvic irradiation

As the number of cancer survivors increases, so does the demand for preserving male fertility after radiation. It is important for healthcare providers to understand the pathophysiology of radiation-induced testicular injury, the techniques of fertility preservation both before and during radiation, and their role in counseling patients on the risks to their fertility and the means of mitigating these risks. Impaired spermatogenesis is a known testicular toxicity of radiation in both the acute and the late settings, as rapidly dividing spermatogonial germ cells are exquisitely sensitive to irradiation. The threshold for spermatogonial injury and subsequent impairment in spermatogenesis is ~ 0.1 Gy and the severity of gonadal injury is highly dose-dependent. Total doses < 4 Gy may allow for recovery of spermatogenesis and fertility potential, but with larger doses, recovery may be protracted or impossible. All patients undergoing gonadotoxic radiation therapy should be counseled on the possibility of future infertility, offered the opportunity for semen cryopreservation, and offered referral to a fertility specialist. In addition to this, every effort should be made to shield the testes (if not expected to contain tumor) during therapy.

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient Experiences in Fertility Preservation: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with Cancer

With better survival rates for patients diagnosed with cancer, more attention has been focused on future risks, like fertility decline due to gonadotoxic treatment. In this regard, the emphasis during counselling regarding possible preservation options is often on the treatment itself, meaning that the medical and emotional needs of patients regarding counselling, treatment, and future fertility are often overlooked. This review focuses on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient experiences regarding fertility preservation (FP)-among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. A systematic review of the literature, with a systematic search of online databases, was performed, resulting in 61 selected articles. A quality assessment was performed by a mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). Based on this search, three important topics emerged: initiating discussion about the risk of fertility decline, acknowledging the importance of future fertility, and recognizing the need for more verbal and written patient-specific information. In addition, patients value follow-up care and the opportunity to rediscuss FP and their concerns about future fertility and use of stored material. A clear FP healthcare pathway can prevent delays in receiving a referral to a fertility specialist to discuss FP options and initiating FP treatment. This patient-centered approach will optimize FP experiences and help to establish a process to achieve long-term follow up after FP treatment.

Perceptions of Oncology Nurses Regarding Fertility Preservation and Providing Oncofertility Services for Men of Childbearing Age with Cancer

This study investigated the knowledge, thoughts, and attitudes of oncology nurses in China regarding fertility preservation for male cancer patients of childbearing age, and for offering counseling or oncofertility services for the men in their care. Data was collected from 18 oncology nurses in Southwest China through voluntary self-report and in-depth interviews. The qualitative interview data were analyzed using a descriptive phenomenology method based on the lived experience of the nurses. The interviewees commonly reported 6 main concerns regarding fertility preservation (FP): their insufficient knowledge and inadequate nursing education; the importance of offering such services to cancer patients; legal vulnerability if FP information is withheld from patients; the role of the nurse in counseling; and barriers to discussing FP in practice. Nurses had a positive attitude toward FP, but most had no practical role in routinely informing male patients of their options, and the nurses believed that discussion of FP was outside their scope of practice. This study offers insight into the perceptions of oncology nurses in a developing country regarding the provision of FP services for adult male cancer patients. These results lead us to recommend that local fertility nurses should be given new training regarding FP. Furthermore, nurse-led clinics are desirable. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of nurse participation in FP counseling and referral, and how to improve the professional confidence of oncology nurses for addressing FP issues.

The Educational Program for Healthcare Providers Regarding Fertility Preservation for Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review

The emerging discipline of oncofertility advocates for the timely provision of fertility preservation (FP) to all cancer patients of childbearing age by healthcare providers. A lack of practice due to limited FP-related knowledge was found among healthcare providers. A systematic review was undertaken on the educational programs on FP for healthcare providers. An initial search was performed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases in October 2019. This review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Among the 160 articles that were identified, five relevant articles published between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. Of the five studies, three were quantitative nonrandomized studies, one was a randomized controlled trial, and one was a qualitative study. Three programs were relevant to oncology nurses, one was relevant to social workers as well as nurses, and one was relevant to oncology fellows and residents. The four programs significantly increased healthcare providers' knowledge about FP, but clinical practice was only improved in the Educating Nurses about Reproductive Issues in Cancer Healthcare program (P < 0.01). Nevertheless, most of the studies used a self-made questionnaire or tool to assess the effects of the training programs. The educational programs improved the FP-related knowledge of healthcare providers but lacked the high-quality randomized controlled trials needed to provide robust evidence on the effectiveness of training programs using standard tools. More training projects should be developed based on learning theories or models to improve oncofertility care in clinical practice.