1
|
Hayes BD, Young HG, Atrchian S, Vis-Dunbar M, Stork MJ, Pandher S, Samper S, McCorquodale S, Loader A, Voss C. Primary care provider-led cancer survivorship care in the first 5 years following initial cancer treatment: a scoping review of the barriers and solutions to implementation. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:352-365. [PMID: 36376712 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01268-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To synthesize the barriers to primary care provider (PCP)-led cancer survivorship care (≤ 5 years after initial cancer treatment) experienced by healthcare systems around the world, and to explore potential solutions that would succeed within a developed country. METHODS A scoping review of peer-reviewed articles and grey literature was conducted. Four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar) were searched for articles prior to April 2021. RESULTS Ninety-seven articles published across the globe (USA, Canada, Australia, European Union, and UK) met the review inclusion/exclusion criteria. The four most frequently discussed barriers to PCP-led survivorship care in healthcare systems were as follows: (1) insufficient communication between PCPs and cancer specialists, (2) limited PCP knowledge, (3) time restrictions for PCPs to provide comprehensive survivorship care, and (4) a lack of resources (e.g., survivorship care guidelines). Potential solutions to combat these barriers were as follows: (1) improving interdisciplinary communication, (2) bolstering PCP education, and (3) providing survivorship resources. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review identified and summarized key barriers and solutions to the provision of PCP-led cancer survivorship care. Importantly, the findings from this review provide insight and direction to guide optimization of cancer care practice within BC's healthcare system. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Optimizing the PCP-led survivorship care model will be a valuable contribution to the field of cancer survivorship care and will hopefully lead to more widespread use of this model, ultimately lessening the growing demand for cancer-specific care by cancer specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian D Hayes
- Southern Medical Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Hannah G Young
- Southern Medical Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Siavash Atrchian
- BC Cancer, Kelowna, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Division of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Matthew J Stork
- Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 1088 Discovery Avenue, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada
| | - Satvir Pandher
- Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sofia Samper
- Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 1088 Discovery Avenue, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada
| | - Sarah McCorquodale
- Southern Medical Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
- Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 1088 Discovery Avenue, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada
| | | | - Christine Voss
- Southern Medical Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada.
- Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 1088 Discovery Avenue, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stout NL, Boatman D, Rice M, Branham E, Miller M, Salyer R. Unmet Needs and Care Delivery Gaps Among Rural Cancer Survivors. J Patient Exp 2024; 11:23743735241239865. [PMID: 38505492 PMCID: PMC10949551 DOI: 10.1177/23743735241239865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Community-based healthcare delivery systems frequently lack cancer-specific survivorship support services. This leads to a burden of unmet needs that is magnified in rural areas. Using sequential mixed methods we assessed unmet needs among rural cancer survivors diagnosed between 2015 and 2021. The Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS) assessed 5 domains; Physical and Daily Living, Psychological, Support and Supportive Services, Sexual, and Health Information. Needs were analyzed across domains by cancer type. Survey respondents were recruited for qualitative interviews to identify care gaps. Three hundred and sixty two surveys were analyzed. Participants were 85% White (n = 349) 65% (n = 234) female and averaged 2.03 years beyond cancer diagnosis. Nearly half (49.5%) of respondents reported unmet needs, predominantly in physical, psychological, and health information domains. Needs differed by stage of disease. Eleven interviews identified care gap themes regarding; Finding Support and Supportive Services and Health Information regarding Care Delivery and Continuity of Care. Patients experience persistent unmet needs after a cancer diagnosis across multiple functional domains. Access to community-based support services and health information is lacking. Community based resources are needed to improve access to care for long-term cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole L Stout
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
- Department of Health Policy, Management, and Leadership, School of Public, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Dannell Boatman
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Madeline Rice
- Division of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Emelia Branham
- Division of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | | | - Rachel Salyer
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Collaço N, Lippiett KA, Wright D, Brodie H, Winter J, Richardson A, Foster C. Barriers and facilitators to integrated cancer care between primary and secondary care: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:120. [PMID: 38252169 PMCID: PMC10803398 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08278-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This scoping review identifies and characterises reported barriers and facilitators to providing integrated cancer care reported in the international literature, and develops recommendations for clinical practice. METHODS This scoping review included literature published between 2009 and 2022 and describes the delivery of integrated cancer care between primary and secondary care sectors. Searches were conducted of an online database Ovid Medline and grey literature. RESULTS The review included thirty-two papers. Barriers and facilitators to integrated cancer care were identified in three core areas: (1) at an individual user level around patient-healthcare professional interactions, (2) at an organisational level, and (3) at a healthcare system level. The review findings identified a need for further training for primary care professionals on cancer care, clarity in the delineation of primary care and oncologist roles (i.e. who does what), effective communication and engagement between primary and secondary care, and the provision of protocols and guidelines for follow-up care in cancer. CONCLUSIONS Information sharing and communication between primary and secondary care must improve to meet the increasing demand for support for people living with and beyond cancer. Delivering integrated pathways between primary and secondary care will yield improvements in patient outcomes and health economic costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Collaço
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer (CentRIC+), School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England
| | - Kate A Lippiett
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
| | - David Wright
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer (CentRIC+), School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England
| | - Hazel Brodie
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
| | - Jane Winter
- Wessex Cancer Alliance, Oakley Road, Southampton, England
| | - Alison Richardson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England
| | - Claire Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer (CentRIC+), School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Halpern M, Mollica MA, Han PK, Tonorezos ES. Myths and Presumptions About Cancer Survivorship. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:134-139. [PMID: 37972343 PMCID: PMC10824378 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Identifying cancer survivorship myths and presumptions perpetuated in survivorship circles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Halpern
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Michelle A. Mollica
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Paul K.J. Han
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Emily S. Tonorezos
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gordon JR, Yack M, Kikuchi K, Stevens L, Merchant L, Buys C, Gottschalk L, Frame M, Mussetter J, Younkin S, Zimmerman H, Kirchhoff AC, Wetter DW. Research-practice partnership: supporting rural cancer survivors in Montana. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:1085-1094. [PMID: 37490140 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01750-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this Research-Practice Partnership was to disseminate and implement strategies to assist Community Health Centers in improving the care of rural cancer survivors in Montana. Funded by the National Cancer Institute's Community Outreach and Engagement mechanism, this project utilized the MAP-IT (Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track) program planning framework from Healthy People 2020. Partners included Montana's Department of Public Health and Human Services' Cancer Control Program, Montana Primary Care Association, One Health Community Health Center, and Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah. Project activities focused on (1) Planning, creating, implementing, and evaluating provider/care team education sessions through the Project ECHO tele-mentoring platform and through short webinars and (2) Building processes for identifying, documenting, and connecting with survivors using electronic health records (EHRs) and other resources. Lessons learned from this project include the value of aligning partner goals from the outset to foster sustained commitment, the importance of adapting implementation plans to address challenges and leverage opportunities, and the need for accurate EHR data and formal processes for identifying and engaging with cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janna R Gordon
- Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Melissa Yack
- Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Kara Kikuchi
- Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Practice Engagement and Translation, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Leticia Stevens
- Biomedical Informatics Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Leah Merchant
- Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Bureau, Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Helena, MT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Stephanie Younkin
- Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Bureau, Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Helena, MT, USA
| | - Heather Zimmerman
- Montana Central Tumor Registry and Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Helena, MT, USA
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David W Wetter
- Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Practice Engagement and Translation, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aggarwal M, Abdelhalim R, Fowler N, Oandasan I. Conceptualizing "Preparedness for Practice": Perspectives of Early-Career Family Physicians. Fam Med 2023; 55:667-676. [PMID: 37643091 PMCID: PMC10741718 DOI: 10.22454/fammed.2023.294689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Competency based medical education (CBME) aims to produce graduates prepared for independent practice. Many equate the outcome of "preparedness for practice" with acquisition of competence. As educators evaluate the outcomes of CBME, being clear on the concept of preparedness for practice will clarify the results that are measured and assessed. This study examined how preparedness for practice is conceptualized in the literature and by family physicians (FPs) in Canada. METHODS This multimethod qualitative descriptive study included (1) rapid review and narrative synthesis, and (2) focus groups with early-career FPs using maximum variation sampling until thematic saturation was reached. Focus groups explored the FPs' conceptualizations of preparedness for practice. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded before content analysis. RESULTS Thirty-four articles met the inclusion criteria, and 59 early-career FPs participated in the focus groups. We found no consensus on the conceptualization of preparedness for practice in the literature; however, the concept often was described as acquiring competencies for program requirements. In the literature and focus groups, we identified four themes for the conceptualization of preparedness for practice. These themes included competence, self-confidence (self-efficacy, self-concept), capability, and adaptability. CONCLUSIONS Preparedness for practice involves an interplay of dynamic and complex constructs from competence, self-confidence, capability, and adaptability. Preparedness is more than possessing several competencies; it calls for integrating and applying competencies in complex and changing environments. This study aimed to start a discussion on what end point is desirable for residency education and proposed that the end point needs to move beyond competencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Aggarwal
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of TorontoToronto, ONCanada
| | - Reham Abdelhalim
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of TorontoToronto, ONCanada
| | - Nancy Fowler
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster UniversityHamilton, ONCanada
| | - Ivy Oandasan
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoToronto, ONCanada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Adler Jaffe S, Kano M, Rieder S, Gundelach AC, Boyce T, Rutledge T, Dayao Z, Sussman AL. "Care needs to be integrated" Patient and provider perspectives on a cancer shared-care model. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01486-y. [PMID: 37889397 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01486-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current early-stage breast and gynecological cancer care models often begin with a referral from a primary care provider (PCP) or gynecologist (OB/Gyn) and end with a patient being transitioned back to the referring provider at the completion of treatment. There is frequently little communication between oncologists and the referring provider during treatment, and this pattern continues after the patient completes their treatment. METHODS We convened a diverse Patient Advisory Board (PAB) to identify areas where breast or gynecological cancer patients felt they could benefit from additional support during and after their cancer care. PAB members attended five Zoom meetings and completed four online surveys. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary care or OB/Gyn physicians to collect information on current practices. RESULTS Patients identified multiple areas in which they needed additional support from their PCP. Providers also identified topics on which they could use additional training. However, there was little overlap between patient and provider priority topics. Both patients and providers agreed that there was inadequate communication between the cancer center and PCPs before, during, and after cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS A shared-care model that emphasizes communication between primary care providers, the oncology care team, and patients is urgently needed. Patients indicated the need for additional support from their PCP on specific topics, and PCPs were interested in continuing their education to better serve their patients with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The importance of consistent communication among all parties during the entire cancer journey was emphasized as a key area for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miria Kano
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Stephanie Rieder
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Amy C Gundelach
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Tawny Boyce
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Teresa Rutledge
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Zoneddy Dayao
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Andrew L Sussman
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Townsend JS, Rohan EA, Sabatino SA, Puckett M. Use of Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines by Primary Care Providers in the United States. J Am Board Fam Med 2023; 36:789-802. [PMID: 37775322 PMCID: PMC10658988 DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230036r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND National organizations have issued comprehensive cancer survivorship care guidelines to improve care of cancer survivors, many of whom receive care from primary care providers (PCPs). METHODS We analyzed Porter Novelli's 2019 fall DocStyles survey to assess use of cancer survivorship care guidelines, receipt of survivorship training, types of survivorship services provided, and confidence providing care among PCPs in the United States. We grouped PCPs by use of any guideline ("users") versus no guideline use ("nonusers"). We calculated descriptive statistics and conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine guideline use, having received training on providing survivorship care services, and confidence in providing care. Within the panel, sampling quotas were set so that 1000 primary care physicians, 250 OB/GYNs, 250 pediatricians, and 250 nurse practitioners/physician assistants were recruited. RESULTS To reach selected quotas, 2696 health professionals were initially contacted to participate, resulting in a response rate of 64.9%. Sixty-two percent of PCPs reported using guidelines and 17% reported receiving survivorship care training. Use of any guidelines or receiving training was associated with reporting providing a range of survivorship services and confidence in providing care. After adjusting for demographic characteristics, guideline users were more likely than nonusers to report assessing genetic cancer risk (OR = 2.65 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.68, 4.17)), screening for cancer recurrence (OR = 2.32 95% CI (1.70, 3.18)) or a new cancer (OR = 1.63, 95% CI (1.20, 2.22)), and treating depression (OR = 1.64, 95% CI (1.20, 2.25)). Receipt of training was also positively associated with providing genetic risk assessment, surveillance for recurrence, as well as assessing late/long-term effects, and treating pain, fatigue, and sexual side effects. CONCLUSION Survivorship care guidelines and training support PCPs in providing a range of survivorship care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie S Townsend
- From the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (JST, EAR, SAS, MP).
| | - Elizabeth A Rohan
- From the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (JST, EAR, SAS, MP)
| | - Susan A Sabatino
- From the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (JST, EAR, SAS, MP)
| | - Mary Puckett
- From the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (JST, EAR, SAS, MP)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Becevic M, Anbari AB, McElroy JA. It's Not Always Easy: Cancer Survivorship Care in Primary Care Settings. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023; 38:1592-1599. [PMID: 37133797 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-023-02304-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
By 2040, an anticipated 26.1 million people with a history of cancer will be part of the healthcare system. The purpose of this study was to explore Missouri-based non-oncology clinicians' perspectives on caring for patients with a history of cancer to identify needs of rural-based clinicians to optimize their patients' survivorship care. Using an interpretive qualitative descriptive approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 non-oncology clinicians. We encouraged clinicians to discuss their approach to caring for patients with a history of cancer and invited them to talk about what might help them increase their knowledge of survivorship care best practices. Through interpretive qualitative descriptive analysis methods including first level coding and constant comparison, we found there is consensus that cancer survivorship care is important; however, training that now guides our clinicians occurred mostly during residency, if at all. Clinicians relied on previous patient encounters and oncology notes combined with their patients' personal account of treatment history to inform the best next steps. Clinicians expressed strong interest in having a simple protocol of their patient's treatment with prompts of known long-term cancer treatment-related effects and a patient-centric follow-up monitoring schedule (mandatory vs recommended vs optional). Clinicians expressed interest in educational opportunities about cancer care and ability for curbside consults with oncologists. They consistently noted the limited resources available in rural areas and that rural patients may have different preferences and approaches to cancer survivorship. There is a clear opportunity to improve non-oncology clinicians' knowledge of the needs of people with a history of cancer as well as their own knowledge base and self-efficacy, especially in rural settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirna Becevic
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, 1 Hospital Drive, MA111, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA.
- Missouri Telehealth Network, University of Missouri, 4215 Phillips Farm Road, Suite 121, MO, 65212, Columbia, USA.
- Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, 241 Naka Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
| | - Allison B Anbari
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, 915 Hitt St., Columbia, MO, 65212, USA
| | - Jane A McElroy
- Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Medical Sciences Building, 1 Hospital Drive, MA306, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Corrigan KL, Reeve BB, Salsman JM, Siembida EJ, Smith GL, Swartz MC, Lee KL, Afridi F, Andring LM, Bishop AJ, Gunther JR, Livingston JA, Peterson SK, Parsons SK, Roth M. Association of Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life With Physician-Reported Toxicities in Adolescents and Young Adults Receiving Radiation Therapy for Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:610-619. [PMID: 37311165 PMCID: PMC10424910 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy (RT) may cause toxicities in adolescents and young adults (AYAs, age 15-39 years) with cancer. However, the range of RT-related toxicities in AYAs and the affect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has not been well studied. We performed a cross-sectional study in AYAs with cancer who received RT to identify RT-related toxicities and examine their impact on HRQOL. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 178 AYAs received RT and completed PROMIS HRQOL instruments from 2018 to 2022. Acute and late physician-graded Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events RT-related toxicities were extracted and described. Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the association of RT-related toxicity with HRQOL scores during and post-RT. Minimally important differences were used to evaluate the clinical relevance of relationships. RESULTS Eighty-four AYAs completed HRQOL surveys during RT and 94 post-RT. In the during-RT cohort, 75 AYAs (89%) had acute RT-related toxicities, a majority of which were grade 1 (n = 49, 65%). AYAs who experienced acute grade 2 or greater toxicities reported worse global mental health (B = -7.35, P < .01) and worse pain (B = 5.25, P = .01) than those with acute grade 1 or no toxicities. In the post-RT cohort, the median (IQR) time from RT to survey completion was 24 (14-27) months. Forty-eight AYAs (51%) had late RT-related toxicities, a majority of which were grade 1 (n = 37, 77%). AYAs who experienced late grade 2 or greater toxicities reported worse global mental health (B = -8.07, P = .01), worse social roles (B = -9.96, P < .01), and greater sleep disturbance (B = 10.75, P < .01) than those with late grade 1 or no RT toxicities. CONCLUSION The presence of acute and late grade 2 or greater RT-related toxicities may contribute to worse HRQOL, especially global mental health, in AYAs. Screening and early interventions to mitigate RT-related toxicities are needed to improve AYA HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey L. Corrigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bryce B. Reeve
- Center for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - John M. Salsman
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maria C. Swartz
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kamaria L. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Faraz Afridi
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lauren M. Andring
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Andrew J. Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jillian R. Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - J. Andrew Livingston
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Susan K. Parsons
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, ICRHPS, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Roth
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oldfield LE, Jones V, Gill B, Kodous N, Fazelzad R, Rodin D, Sandhu H, Umakanthan B, Papadakos J, Giuliani ME. Synthesis of Existent Oncology Curricula for Primary Care Providers: A Scoping Review With a Global Equity Lens. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2200298. [PMID: 37141562 DOI: 10.1200/go.22.00298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Global increases in cancer, coupled with a shortage of cancer specialists, has led to an increasing role for primary care providers (PCP) in cancer care. This review aimed to examine all extant cancer curricula for PCPs and to analyze the motivations for curriculum development. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from inception to October 13, 2021, with no language restrictions. The initial search yielded 11,162 articles and 10,902 articles underwent title and abstract review. After full-text review, 139 articles were included. Numeric and thematic analyses were conducted and education programs were evaluated using Bloom's taxonomy. RESULTS Most curricula were developed in high-income countries (HICs), with 58% in the United States. Cancer-specific curricula focused on HIC priority cancers, such as skin/melanoma, and did not represent the global cancer burden. Most (80%) curricula were developed for staff physicians and 73% focused on cancer screening. More than half (57%) of programs were delivered in person, with a shift toward online delivery over time. Less than half (46%) of programs were codeveloped with PCPs and 34% did not involve PCPs in the program design and development. Curricula were primarily developed to improve cancer knowledge, and 72 studies assessed multiple outcome measures. No studies included the top two levels of Bloom's taxonomy of learning (evaluating; creating). CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first review to assess the current state of cancer curricula for PCPs with a global focus. This review shows that extant curricula are primarily developed in HICs, do not represent the global cancer burden, and focus on cancer screening. This review lays a foundation to advance the cocreation of curricula that are aligned to the global cancer burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vivien Jones
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bhajan Gill
- Cancer Education, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nardeen Kodous
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rouhi Fazelzad
- Library and Information Services, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danielle Rodin
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Ben Umakanthan
- Cancer Education, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Janet Papadakos
- Cancer Education, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The Institute for Education Research, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Meredith Elana Giuliani
- Cancer Education, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Collinson M, Mason E, Kelley R, Griffiths A, Ashley L, Henry A, Inman H, Cowdell F, Hennell J, Jones L, Walsh M, Ogden M, Farrin A, Surr C. Characteristics and general practice resource use of people with comorbid cancer and dementia in England: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:281. [PMID: 36371194 PMCID: PMC9655793 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01882-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Cancer and dementia are common in older people and management of the conditions as comorbidities can be challenging, yet little is known about the size or characteristics of this group. We aimed to estimate the prevalence, characteristics and general practice resource usage of people living with both conditions in England. Methods Anonymised electronic healthcare records from 391 National Health Service general practices across England using the TPP SystmOne general practice system were obtained from ResearchOne. Data included demographic and clinical characteristics, and general practice healthcare useage (appointments, prescriptions, referrals and secondary care contacts) for people aged 50 and over with a cancer and/or dementia diagnosis consistent with the Quality and Outcomes Framework between 2005 and 2016. Multi-level negative binomial regression was used to analyse the association between having cancer and/or dementia and the number of general practice appointments. Results Data from 162,371 people with cancer and/or dementia were analysed; 3616 (2.2%) people were identified as having comorbid cancer and dementia. Of people with cancer, 3.1% also had dementia, rising to 7.5% (1 in 13 people) in those aged 75 and over. Fewer people with both conditions were female (50.7%) compared to those with dementia alone (65.6%) and those with comorbid cancer and dementia were older than those with cancer alone [mean ages 83 (sd = 7), 69 (sd = 12) respectively]. Those with both conditions were less likely to have lung cancer than those with cancer alone (7.5% vs. 10.3%) but more likely to have prostate cancer (20.9% vs. 15.8%). Additional comorbidities were more prevalent for those with both conditions than those with cancer or dementia alone (68.4% vs. 50.2% vs. 54.0%). In the year following the first record of either condition, people with cancer and dementia had 9% more general practice appointments (IRR:1.09, 95% CI:1.01–1.17) than those with cancer alone and 37% more appointments than those with dementia alone (IRR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.28–1.47). Conclusions A significant number of people are living with comorbid cancer and dementia in England. This group have additional comorbidity and higher general practice usage than those with cancer/dementia alone. The needs of this group should be considered in future general practice care planning and research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01882-w.
Collapse
|
13
|
Eikeland SA, Smeland KB, Brekke M, Kiserud CE, Fosså A. Late-effect awareness and follow-up of cancer in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2022; 40:360-369. [PMID: 36380478 PMCID: PMC9848261 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2139457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With increasing cancer incidence and survival rates, follow-up care becomes a major healthcare concern, placing increased demands on general practitioners (GPs). We explored GPs' awareness of late effects (LEs) after cancer treatment. Their degree of involvement and attitudes towards follow-up care was studied separately for solid cancers and Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). DESIGN AND SETTING Mailed questionnaire study in Norwegian general practice. SUBJECTS 185 responding GPs with responsibility for HL survivors, more than 10 years since diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS All GPs reported some awareness of LEs. Increasing awareness of LEs was associated with female sex, being a specialist, having experience from hospital-based cancer care and familiarity with official guidelines on LEs after treatment. The majority of GPs were involved in follow-up care, which increased with patients' time since treatment and was associated with higher awareness of LEs. GPs with work experience in hospital-based cancer care were more likely to be engaged in HL follow-up. Most GPs were willing to provide follow-up care at some point after treatment. Older and more experienced GPs, and those satisfied with the collaboration with hospital specialists, were more likely to provide follow-up earlier. CONCLUSION GPs' awareness of LEs and their willingness to provide follow-up care were related to familiarity with guidelines and experience. GPs more involved in follow-up care also had higher knowledge of LEs. Distribution of guidelines on LEs and follow-up care, and improving collaboration with hospital specialists, might increase GPs' knowledge and willingness to become involved in follow-up care, especially early in their careers. GPs' involvement and attitude towards follow-up of survivors of common solid cancers and HL, a rare malignant disease, were similar.KEY POINTSNorwegian general practitioners (GPs) are involved in survivorship care after cancer treatment. We investigated their awareness of late effects (LEs), their involvement and their attitude towards follow-up care of solid cancers and Hodgkin's lymphoma. • GPs registered as specialists, aware of guidelines and with experience from hospital-based cancer care reported higher awareness of LEs. • GPs with higher awareness of LEs were more frequently involved in follow-up care. • GPs with longer experience in general practice were comfortable with follow-up care at an earlier stage after treatment. • Results were similar for follow-up care of survivors of solid cancers and Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siri A. Eikeland
- National Advisory Unit for Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- CONTACT Siri A. Eikeland Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953, Nydalen, Oslo0424, Norway
| | - Knut B. Smeland
- National Advisory Unit for Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Brekke
- General Practice Research Unit, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie E. Kiserud
- National Advisory Unit for Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alexander Fosså
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Specialist versus Primary Care Prostate Cancer Follow-Up: A Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133166. [PMID: 35804937 PMCID: PMC9264897 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Worldwide, there is an increased focus on reorganizing prostate cancer survivorship care. In this study, we describe for the first time a process evaluation as part of a randomized controlled trial that is currently comparing the effectiveness of specialist- versus primary care-based prostate cancer follow-up. We found that within an RCT context, 67% patients and their GPs were willing to receive/provide primary care-based follow-up. Patients who received primary care-based follow-up care experienced this to be more personal, efficient, and sustainable. However, patients, GPs, and specialists also indicated several challenges that are described in this study and should be addressed to enable a smooth transition of prostate cancer follow-up to primary care. Abstract Background: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is currently comparing the effectiveness of specialist- versus primary care-based prostate cancer follow-up. This process evaluation assesses the reach and identified constructs for the implementation of primary care-based follow-up. Methods: A mixed-methods approach is used to assess the reach and the implementation through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. We use quantitative data to evaluate the reach of the RCT and qualitative data (interviews) to indicate the perspectives of patients (n = 15), general practitioners (GPs) (n = 10), and specialists (n = 8). Thematic analysis is used to analyze the interview transcripts. Results: In total, we reached 402 (67%) patients from 12 hospitals and randomized them to specialist- (n = 201) or to primary care-based (n = 201) follow-up. From the interviews, we identify several advantages of primary care- versus specialist-based follow-up: it is closer to home, more accessible, and the relationship is more personal. Nevertheless, participants also identified challenges: guidelines should be implemented, communication and collaboration between primary and secondary care should be improved, quality indicators should be collected, and GPs should be compensated. Conclusion: Within an RCT context, 402 (67%) patients and their GPs were willing to receive/provide primary care-based follow-up. If the RCT shows that primary care is equally as effective as specialist-based follow-up, the challenges identified in this study need to be addressed to enable a smooth transition of prostate cancer follow-up to primary care.
Collapse
|
15
|
Piombo SE, Stal J, Kagramanov D, Kysh L, Freyer DR, Turner BJ, Miller KA. Integrating primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059050. [PMID: 35577464 PMCID: PMC9115019 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improved treatment regimens have led to increased survival rates among childhood cancer survivors (CCS), and more than 84% of all children diagnosed with cancer will experience long-term survival or cure. Survivors are susceptible to late effects of cancer treatment often requiring lifelong follow-up care, as many of these conditions can be prevented or mitigated with surveillance. Integrating primary care (PC) and childhood cancer survivorship care can improve follow-up for survivors, however, little integrative research exists. This scoping review aims to: identify and describe existing models of care that integrate PC and childhood cancer survivorship care, examine the effectiveness of these models of care, and characterise the barriers and facilitators for the integration of PC for CCS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A comprehensive empirical literature search of three electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase) was employed to identify potentially relevant citations on 1 October 2020. The population, independent variables/intervention, comparator, outcomes, timing, setting and study design/other limiters (PICOTSS) framework was used to inform protocol development. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist and explanation will be used to report study findings. The search strategy will be completed again prior to publication to ensure recent empirical research is accounted for. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This research is exempt from Institutional Review Board (IRB) review. Approval from a research ethics board for this study was not required as it does not involve human participants or unpublished secondary data. The findings from this scoping review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts, clinical conference presentations, professional networks and digital communications using social media platforms such as Twitter. This study has been registered with Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/92xbg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Piombo
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Julia Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dalia Kagramanov
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lynn Kysh
- Institute for Nursing and Interprofessional Research, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David R Freyer
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Barbara J Turner
- Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Research and Innovation, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kimberly A Miller
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Doescher MP, Nagykaldi Z, Zhao YD, Dwyer K. Oncology and Primary Care Provider Views on Cancer Survivorship Care: Mind the Gap. J Am Board Fam Med 2022; 35:329-340. [PMID: 35379720 PMCID: PMC10897935 DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Coordination between oncology and primary care practices in cancer survivorship is lacking. OBJECTIVE To identify cancer care coordination perceptions, knowledge, and practices in a sample of Oklahoma oncology care providers (ONCs) and primary care providers (PCPs) regarding post-treatment care of adult cancer survivors. DESIGN Cross-sectional, statewide survey by mail/web link in 2014/5. SETTING PCPs identified through a primary care research network, primary care organization membership lists; ONCs identified through www.Healthgrades.com. PARTICIPANTS Contacts who were clinically active and seeing cancer patients were eligible. The final sample size included 101 ONCs and 58 PCPs who reported actively seeing cancer patients. MEASURES Responses to predominately Likert scale or ranked-order questions derived from the Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors. ANALYSES Chi square and t tests were performed to test bivariate associations between provider type and survey measures. RESULTS Statistically significant differences (P < .05) between ONC and PCP perceptions were observed for several questions on communication between the 2 provider types, ONC perceptions of PCP ability to address survivorship care, and responsibilities for post-treatment care. CONCLUSIONS Highly discrepant perspectives between ONCs and PCPs regarding communications and responsibilities for survivorship care may lead to adverse health outcomes. Interventions aimed at improving care coordination for cancer survivors should define each provider group's responsibilities in survivorship care, and create structures and processes that foster clear channels of communication between ONC and PCP practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark P Doescher
- From Stephenson Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (MPD); College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (ZN); Stephenson Cancer Center, Hudson College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (YDZ); Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (KD).
| | - Zsolt Nagykaldi
- From Stephenson Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (MPD); College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (ZN); Stephenson Cancer Center, Hudson College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (YDZ); Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (KD)
| | - Yan Daniel Zhao
- From Stephenson Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (MPD); College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (ZN); Stephenson Cancer Center, Hudson College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (YDZ); Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (KD)
| | - Kathleen Dwyer
- From Stephenson Cancer Center, College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (MPD); College of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (ZN); Stephenson Cancer Center, Hudson College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (YDZ); Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK (KD)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stewart TP, Sesto ME, Haine JE, Henningfield MF, Norslien K, Zhang X, Hahn DL, Tevaarwerk AJ. Results of Engineering, Primary Care, Oncology Collaborative Regarding a Survey of Primary Care on a Re-Engineered Survivorship Care Plan. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:23-29. [PMID: 32488627 PMCID: PMC7708524 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01776-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Survivorship care plans (SCPs) may facilitate cancer survivorship care shared between oncologists and primary care, particularly for patients more likely to receive care across healthcare systems such as rural patients. However, limited research has addressed primary care clinicians' information or workflow needs with regard to SCPs. This study's objective was to assess primary care clinicians' perceived usefulness with a re-engineered SCP previously developed by applying engineering approaches and informed by primary care preferences. An emailed survey of primary care clinicians assessed perceived usefulness with the re-engineered SCP. Clinicians were recruited across the USA from primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) with high concentrations of rural practices. Over 90% of respondents (n = 111) agreed that (1) the re-engineered SCP was useful (n = 95) and (2) they would want to receive a similar SCP (n = 93). The majority demonstrated high agreement regarding the SCP's relevance, understandability, content, and ability to help provide better survivorship care. Perceived usefulness was consistent between rural and non-rural clinicians. Suggested improvements involved decreased length, addition of a bulleted list, and electronic health record integration. Results indicate that the majority of primary care clinicians perceive the re-engineered SCP as useful. However, primary care clinicians indicated continued barriers despite end-user specific alterations. Future research should investigate additional strategies to support primary care survivorship-related workload, provide essential SCP content, and improve survivorship care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor P Stewart
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Mary E Sesto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
- Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - James E Haine
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Mary F Henningfield
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | | | | | - David L Hahn
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA
| | - Amye J Tevaarwerk
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, 6037 Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
- Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brauer ER, Long EF, Petersen L, Ganz PA. Current practice patterns and gaps in guideline-concordant breast cancer survivorship care. J Cancer Surviv 2021; 17:906-915. [PMID: 34970715 PMCID: PMC9243187 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01152-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer-specific survivorship care guidelines for the more than 3.8 million survivors in the U.S. are available, but implementation in clinical practice remains challenging. We examined current practice patterns and factors associated with guideline-concordant survivorship care among oncologists. METHODS A national sample of medical oncologists, recruited using two databases, participated in a survey focused on practice patterns for breast cancer survivorship care. A "survivorship care composite score" was calculated for each respondent based on provision of services recommended in the survivorship guidelines. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression analyses examined associations between physician and practice characteristics and composite scores. RESULTS The survey was completed by 217 medical oncologists, with an overall response rate of 17.9% and eligibility rate of 56.9% for those who responded. Oncologists reported high engagement in evaluation of disease recurrence (78%). Performed less frequently were the provision of survivorship care plans (46%), assessment of psychosocial long-term and late effects (34%), and screening for subsequent cancers (34%). Lack of survivorship care training (p = 0.038) and not routinely informing patients about potential late effects (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with poorer survivorship care composite scores. CONCLUSIONS Despite the availability of disease-specific survivorship care guidelines, adherence to their recommendations in clinical practice is suboptimal. Survey results identified key gaps in survivorship care for breast cancer survivors, particularly related to subsequent primary cancers and psychosocial long-term and late effects. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Improving the delivery of comprehensive survivorship care for the growing population of breast cancer survivors is a high priority. Disease-specific clinical guidelines for cancer survivorship provide valuable recommendations, but innovative strategies are needed to integrate them into the care of long-term breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eden R. Brauer
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
| | - Elisa F. Long
- Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
| | - Laura Petersen
- Cancer Prevention and Control Research, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
| | - Patricia A. Ganz
- David Geffen School of Medicine and Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Conley CC, Goyal NG, Brown SA. #CardioOncology: Twitter chat as a mechanism for increasing awareness of heart health for cancer patients. CARDIO-ONCOLOGY (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2020; 6:19. [PMID: 32922861 PMCID: PMC7480000 DOI: 10.1186/s40959-020-00072-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Consideration of heart health for cancer survivors is increasingly important, as improved cancer survivorship has resulted in a growing number of survivors affected by cardiovascular disease. However, there is limited knowledge of cardio-oncology among both patients and a variety of health professionals. Thus, efforts are needed to increase awareness about cardio-oncology. Social media represents one potential opportunity to disseminate information about cardio-oncology to a large audience. We highlight one example of a social media educational/advocacy campaign conducted on Twitter (a "Twitter Chat") that garnered nearly 1.2 million impressions (views by Twitter users) in just 24 h. We provide both quantitative and qualitative data to support the efficacy of using Twitter for such educational/advocacy campaigns, and describe key features that contributed to its success. Twitter Chats inexpensively utilize innovative technology to provide education and foster community. Long-term studies are needed to understand whether Twitter Chats can change knowledge and behavior related to cardio-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C. Conley
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC USA
| | - Neha G. Goyal
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Sherry-Ann Brown
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Road, Wauwatosa, WI 53226 USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lisy K, Kent J, Piper A, Jefford M. Facilitators and barriers to shared primary and specialist cancer care: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:85-96. [PMID: 32803729 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05624-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To care for the growing population of cancer survivors, health services worldwide must reconsider how to deliver care to people living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis. Shared care, defined as cancer care that is shared between specialist and primary care providers, is one model that has been investigated; however, practical guidance to support implementation is lacking. This systematic review aimed to explore facilitators and barriers to implementing shared cancer care and to develop practice and policy recommendations to support implementation. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in June 2019 across MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, and PsycINFO databases. Quantitative and qualitative data relevant to the review question were extracted and synthesized following a mixed methods approach. RESULTS Thirteen papers were included in the review, 10 qualitative and three quantitative. Included articles were from Australia (n = 8), the USA (n = 3), and one each from the UK and the Netherlands. Sixteen themes were developed under four categories of patient, healthcare professional, process, and policy factors. Key themes included the perceived need for primary care provider training, having clearly defined roles for each healthcare provider, providing general practitioners with diagnostic and treatment summaries, as well as protocols or guidelines for follow-up care, ensuring rapid and accurate communication between providers, utilizing electronic medical records and survivorship care plans as communication tools, and developing consistent policy to reduce fragmentation across services. CONCLUSION Recommendations for practice and policy were generated based on review findings that may support broader implementation of shared cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Lisy
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Jennifer Kent
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amanda Piper
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stephens C, Klemanski D, Lustberg MB, Noonan AM, Brill S, Krok-Schoen JL. Primary care physician's confidence and coordination regarding the survivorship care for older breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:223-230. [PMID: 32338315 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05448-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine primary care physician's (PCPs) internal (confidence, training) and external (communication, receipt of survivorship care plans (SCPs)) regarding their provision of survivorship care to older breast cancer survivors METHOD: A web-based questionnaire was completed individually by PCPs about their training and areas of survivorship they address under their care. A subset of survey participants was interviewed about survivorship care for older breast cancer survivors, care coordination, and areas of improvement regarding SCPs. RESULTS PCPs (n = 29) had an average 13.5 years in family practice. Forty-five percent surveyed as "somewhat confident" or "not confident" evaluating and managing the late effects of cancer treatment, and 25% surveyed as "somewhat confident" or "not confident" addressing the chronic comorbidities of older breast cancer survivors. More than half of PCPs surveyed that they reach out to their patients' oncologist "a little" or "none of the time" and that they receive SCPs "a little" or "none of the time." Semi-structured interviews also indicated that many PCPs did not receive a SCP from their patients' oncologists and that communication between the two providers regarding survivorship care was poor. CONCLUSION Participants indicated that PCP confidence in providing survivorship care is lacking and that lack of training, infrequent communication with oncologists, and underutilization of SCPs may contribute to this lack of confidence. These findings provide insight into the possible need for a well-defined shared care model, which has been encouraged but not always a routine part of survivorship care in various practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Stephens
- Division of Medical Dietetics and Health Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 453 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Dori Klemanski
- Comprehensive Cancer Center-James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Maryam B Lustberg
- Comprehensive Cancer Center-James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 370 W. 9th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Anne M Noonan
- Comprehensive Cancer Center-James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 370 W. 9th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Seuli Brill
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 370 W. 9th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Jessica L Krok-Schoen
- Division of Medical Dietetics and Health Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 453 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. .,Comprehensive Cancer Center-James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|