1
|
Stal J, Piombo SE, Kysh L, Kagramanov D, Freyer DR, Turner BJ, Hempel S, Miller KA. The integration of primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care: a scoping review. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:635-650. [PMID: 36534343 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01296-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This scoping review describes existing care models that integrate primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care, examines the effectiveness of these models, and characterizes barriers and facilitators to their integration. METHODS A systematic search (PubMed®, CINAHL®, Embase®) was conducted to identify citations which were evaluated against inclusion criteria using the PICOTTS framework. The PRISMA-ScR extension for scoping reviews was used to report review findings (protocol https://osf.io/92xbg ). RESULTS Twenty-three studies were included. Three care models integrating primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care were identified: consultative shared care in a primary care setting (N = 3); longitudinal shared care (N = 2); and PCP-led care employing a survivorship care plan (N = 5). While many described risk-adapted care, few used risk stratification approaches to inform care. Measures of model effectiveness varied, with discrepant findings regarding late effects detection in PCP-led approaches. The most frequently cited barriers and facilitators reflected provider- and system-level factors (PCP knowledge/experience identified as greatest barrier (N = 11); clinical information from oncologist identified as greatest facilitator (N = 9)). CONCLUSIONS Identified models depended on PCP knowledge and healthcare system coordination, and studies suggested the need for strong oncologic involvement in follow-up care. Improved training for PCPs and the coordinated transfer of clinical information could facilitate their involvement in such care. Overall, standardized measures of effectiveness are needed to deliver optimal childhood cancer survivorship care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The literature revealed three care models defined by SCP use, provider involvement, and continuity of care, with several studies recommending oncologic involvement in follow-up care for high-risk survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Sarah E Piombo
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynn Kysh
- Institute for Nursing and Interprofessional Research, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Dalia Kagramanov
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David R Freyer
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Barbara J Turner
- Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Research and Innovation, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susanne Hempel
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kimberly A Miller
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stal J, Yi SY, Cohen-Cutler S, Gallagher P, Barzi A, Freyer DR, Kaslander JN, Anto-Ocrah M, Lenz HJ, Miller KA. Sexual dysfunction among early-onset colorectal cancer survivors: Sex-specific correlates of sexual health discussions between patients and providers. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:111-120. [PMID: 37597065 PMCID: PMC10764568 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01772-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD), male erectile dysfunction (ED), and the prevalence and correlates of sexual health discussions between early-onset CRC survivors and their health care providers. METHODS An online, cross-sectional survey was administered in partnership with a national CRC advocacy organization. Respondents (n = 234; diagnosed < 50 years, 6-36 months from diagnosis/relapse) were colon (36.8%) and rectal (63.3%) cancer survivors (62.5% male). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6) was used to measure FSD, and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was used to measure ED. Survivors reported whether a doctor communicated with them about sexual issues during/after treatment. RESULTS Among females (n = 87), 81.6% had FSD (mean FSFI-6 score = 14.3 [SD±6.1]). Among males (n = 145), 94.5% had ED (mean IIEF-5 score = 13.6 [SD±3.4]). Overall, 59.4% of males and 45.4% of females reported a sexual health discussion. Among the total sample, older age of diagnosis and relapse were significantly associated with reporting a discussion, while female sex was negatively associated with reporting a sexual health discussion. Among males, older age at diagnosis and relapse, and among females, older age of diagnosis, were significantly associated with reporting a sexual health discussion. CONCLUSION The prevalence of FSD and ED were high (8 in 10 females reporting FSD, almost all males reporting ED), while reported rates of sexual health discussion were suboptimal (half reported discussion). Interventions to increase CRC provider awareness of patients at risk for not being counseled are needed to optimize long-term health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1845 N. Soto Street, 3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
| | - Serena Y Yi
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1845 N. Soto Street, 3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA
| | - Sally Cohen-Cutler
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Afsaneh Barzi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - David R Freyer
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1845 N. Soto Street, 3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan N Kaslander
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1845 N. Soto Street, 3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA
| | - Martina Anto-Ocrah
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kimberly A Miller
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1845 N. Soto Street, 3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lock D, Vassantachart A, Ragab O, Jennelle R, Han HR, Mehta S, Cheng K, Yang C, Omeh S, Miller K, Stal J, Ballas LK. Radiation Therapy Knowledge and Health Literacy among Culturally Diverse Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated at a Safety-Net Hospital. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e409-e410. [PMID: 37785358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Shared decision making is integral to the physician-patient relationship for radiotherapy (RT) patients. It is implicit that patients both comprehend and retain information explained during consultation. However, quality and quantity of patient knowledge following this visit is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate post-consultation RT knowledge and health literacy among a diverse group of patients. MATERIALS/METHODS Participants were patients ≥18 years old who received consultation for definitive or salvage RT to the prostate gland/fossa between April 2021 and January 2023 at an urban safety-net hospital. Following consultation, patients completed the Radiation Oncology Knowledge Assessment Survey (ROKAS), designed to measure patient understanding of proposed RT treatment (e.g., treatment frequency, length, safety) and possible short- and long-term side effects (SE). Additional measures included patients' health literacy, health numeracy (numerical medical concepts), acculturation (assimilation to the dominant culture), and socioeconomic factors. ROKAS was administered in both English and Spanish with Spanish-speaking patients offered medical translation if desired. Bivariate Pearson correlations were conducted to examine the relationships between independent variables and post-consultation RT knowledge. Two-sided t-tests were conducted to examine differences in patients' knowledge by language. RESULTS Overall, 39 ROKAS were completed by 24 English-speaking and 15 Spanish-speaking patients (mean age 64.4 [SD 6.8], range 52-79). The majority (93%) of patients 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' that they understood all the RT information presented. However, only 70% of the RT questions were answered correctly with 26% of patients answering all RT questions correctly. Similarly, 95% of patients 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' with knowing the side effects of their proposed treatment, but only 71% and 74% of short- and long-term SE questions, respectively, were answered correctly. Higher health literacy (p = 0.04) and health numeracy (p = 0.001) were significantly correlated with better understanding of short-term SE, but not with RT knowledge or long-term SE. Spanish-speaking patients had significantly lower scores of health literacy (p = 0.001) and understanding of long-term (p = 0.01), but not short-term SE. CONCLUSION There is a significant gap between perceived and measured knowledge of RT treatment and SE in patients who receive consultation for RT to the prostate gland/fossa. Health literacy was significantly associated with improved knowledge of RT and short-term SE. Spanish-speaking patients had poorer understanding of long-term SE than English-speaking patients. Efforts to identify gaps in patient health literacy are needed to target those at risk and ensure that culturally diverse patient populations can engage in shared decision making with their providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Lock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A Vassantachart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - O Ragab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - R Jennelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - H R Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - S Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - K Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - C Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - S Omeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - K Miller
- Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - J Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - L K Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Benedict C, Stal J, Davis A, Zeidman A, Pons D, Schapira L, Diefenbach M, Ford JS. Greater fertility distress and avoidance relate to poorer decision making about family building after cancer among adolescent and young adult female survivors. Psychooncology 2023; 32:1606-1615. [PMID: 37695291 PMCID: PMC10591918 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many adolescent and young adult female (AYA-F) cancer survivors face decisions about family building using reproductive medicine or adoption to achieve parenthood. This study evaluated associations among reproductive distress, avoidance, and family-building decision making and identified sociodemographic and clinical characteristics related to high distress and avoidance. METHODS A cross-sectional survey assessed AYA-F survivors' oncofertility experiences. Measures included an investigator-designed Unmet Information Needs scale, Reproductive Concerns After Cancer Scale, Impact of Events Scale-Avoidance subscale, Decision Self-Efficacy scale, and Decision Conflict Scale. Two linear regression models evaluated correlates of decision self-efficacy and decisional conflict about family building after cancer. Bivariate analyses evaluated correlates of avoidance using Pearson's correlation, t-test, and ANOVA. RESULTS AYA-Fs (N = 111) averaged 31-years-old (SD = 5.49) and 3 years post-treatment (range: 1-23 years); 90% were nulliparous. Most common diagnoses were leukemia (24%) and breast cancer (22%). Average decisional conflict was 52.12 (SD = 23.87, range: 0-100); 74% of the sample reported DCS scores within the clinically significant range. Higher levels of reproductive distress (B = -0.23, p = 0.04) and avoidance (B = -0.24, p = 0.02) related to lower decision self-efficacy. Younger age (B = -0.18, p = 0.03), greater unmet information needs (B = 0.33, p < 0.001), and higher levels of reproductive distress (B = 0.34, p = 0.001) related to worse decisional conflict. Predictors of distress and avoidance were identified. CONCLUSIONS After cancer treatment, high fertility distress and avoidant coping were associated with poorer quality decision making about family building after cancer. Fertility counseling post-treatment should support self-efficacy and constructive coping skills to counteract high distress, maladaptive coping, and facilitate values-based decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
| | - Julia Stal
- Department off Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ali Davis
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Anna Zeidman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Devon Pons
- University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Michael Diefenbach
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY
| | - Jennifer S. Ford
- Hunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mobley EM, Moke DJ, Milam J, Ochoa‐Dominguez CY, Stal J, Mitchell H, Aminzadeh N, Bolshakova M, Mailhot Vega RB, Dinalo J, Motala A, Hempel S. Disparities in pediatric cancer survivorship care: A systematic review. Cancer Med 2023; 12:18281-18305. [PMID: 37551113 PMCID: PMC10524017 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) experience many long-term health problems that can be mitigated with recommended survivorship care. However, many CCS do not have access to survivorship care nor receive recommended survivorship care. We reviewed the empirical evidence of disparities in survivorship care for CCS. METHODS This systematic review searched PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for studies on survivorship care for CCS (PROSPERO: CRD42021227965) and abstracted the reported presence or absence of disparities in care. We screened 7945 citations, and of those, we reviewed 2760 publications at full text. RESULTS A total of 22 studies reported in 61 publications met inclusion criteria. Potential disparities by cancer treatment (N = 14), diagnosis (N = 13), sex (N = 13), and current age (N = 13) were frequently studied. There was high quality of evidence (QOE) of survivorship care disparities associated with non-White race, Hispanic ethnicity, and being uninsured. Moderate QOE demonstrated disparities among CCS who were unemployed and older. Lower QOE was found for disparities based on cancer diagnosis, cancer treatment, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, sex, insurance type, income, educational attainment, and geographic area. CONCLUSIONS We found strong empirical evidence of disparities in survivorship care for CCS associated with race, ethnicity, and insurance status. Multiple other disparate groups, such as those by employment, income, insurance type, education, cancer diagnosis, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, cancer treatment, geographic area, sex, and self-identified gender warrant further investigation. Prospective, multilevel research is needed to examine the role of other patient characteristics as potential disparities hindering adequate survivorship care in CCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M. Mobley
- Department of Surgery, College of MedicineUniversity of FloridaJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Diana J. Moke
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow TransplantationChildren's Hospital Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Southern California Center for Young Adult Cancer Survivorship ResearchLos Angeles and IrvineCaliforniaUSA
| | - Joel Milam
- Southern California Center for Young Adult Cancer Survivorship ResearchLos Angeles and IrvineCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Program in Public HealthUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCaliforniaUSA
| | - Carol Y. Ochoa‐Dominguez
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of MedicineUniversity of California San DiegoSan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Julia Stal
- Southern California Center for Young Adult Cancer Survivorship ResearchLos Angeles and IrvineCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Halle Mitchell
- Department of Surgery, College of MedicineUniversity of FloridaJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Naghmeh Aminzadeh
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Maria Bolshakova
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Raymond B. Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of MedicineUniversity of FloridaJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Jennifer Dinalo
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Aneesa Motala
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Susanne Hempel
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ceasar RC, Gould E, Stal J, Laughter J, Tran M, Wang SD, Granacki J, Ziltzer RS, Santos JJ. Legislation has Changed But Issues Remain: Provider Perceptions of Caring for People Who Use Cannabis During Pregnancy in Safety Net Health Settings, a Qualitative Pilot Study. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) 2023; 4:400-408. [PMID: 37529758 PMCID: PMC10389248 DOI: 10.1089/whr.2023.0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective To identify perceptions of cannabis use and risk among maternal health providers who provide care for people who use cannabis during pregnancy in safety-net health settings. Methods Using qualitative, constructivist ground theory methods, we conducted semistructured remote interviews with 10 providers (2 midwives, 6 OB/GYN physicians, and 2 OB/GYN residents) in Southern California, United States, between March 15, 2022, and April 6, 2022. We selected participants through selective sampling using a convenience sample and snowball approach. Providers were eligible for the study if they self-reported via survey to being a maternal health provider (e.g., physician, doula, midwife, and so on) providing care in a safety-net health setting and had cared for people who used cannabis during pregnancy in the last year. Analysis drew upon grounded theory methods to document the socio-structural contexts that contribute to provider perceptions about cannabis. This study was approved by the University of Southern California Institutional Review Board (UP-21-00282-AM009). Results We identified three categories of provider perceptions of cannabis use and risk during pregnancy: (1) Relying on self-education, (2) Taking a case-by-case approach, and (3) Avoiding cannabis discussions to maintain an alliance with patients. Findings indicate that provider reluctance to counsel patients about cannabis in favor of preserving a therapeutic relationship can overlook the lack of resources and access to health care alternatives available to low-income patients that can shape self-medicating. Conclusions Nonpunitive policies and training on cannabis use are critical steps for supporting providers to counsel patients who use cannabis during pregnancy, alongside a harm reduction approach that acknowledges the broader socio-structural contexts and barriers facing patients who disclose use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Carmen Ceasar
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Erin Gould
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Julia Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jen Laughter
- Department of Sociology, California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, California, USA
| | - Michelle Tran
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shirlene D. Wang
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jordan Granacki
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ryan S. Ziltzer
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jasmeen Joy Santos
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stal J, Ramirez CN, Huh J, Tobin J, Kim Y, Miller KA, Milam JE. Examining the Factor Structure of an Adapted Posttraumatic Growth Inventory in a Sample of Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Brief Report. Eval Health Prof 2023; 46:100-104. [PMID: 35727145 DOI: 10.1177/01632787221109309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Posttraumatic growth (PTG) represents positive changes following a trauma, crisis, and/or psychologically distressing event. Experiencing cancer can serve as a traumatic event for patients, resulting in life changes among survivors. Various PTG measures have been used to assess post-cancer change among childhood cancer survivors (CCS), but few have been evaluated for use in this population. This study examined the factor structure of an adapted, 11-item version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) among CCS. A randomly selected subgroup of participants (N = 332) was selected from the Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program (mean age of 26.5 years at time of survey, mean age at diagnosis of 12 years, primarily male [53.6%], and Hispanic [51.5%]). Participants indicated the degree to which they experienced positive, negative, or no change in their life because of their cancer experience. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified two factors: Appreciation of New Possibilities and Spiritual Change. The adapted, 11-item PTGI was deemed appropriate for use among CCS. Additional research is needed to confirm the use of the two-factor model with confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample. Future research on PTG among CCS can consider spiritual change as a potential independent factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, 12223Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Cynthia N Ramirez
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, 12223Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jimi Huh
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, 12223Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jessica Tobin
- 19975VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yoonji Kim
- School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 12219University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Kimberly A Miller
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, 12223Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Dermatology, 12223Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joel E Milam
- School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 12219University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cheng J, Nadim B, Stal J, Cohen-Cutler S, Gallagher P, Kaslander JN, Marin P, Barzi A, Lenz HJ, Freyer DR, Miller KA. Symptom burden over time among early-onset young adult colorectal cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
88 Background: From 1995-2016, rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) have increased among young adults (YA) under 50 years by 2% annually, despite overall rates of CRC among adults over age 65 decreasing. Unfortunately, this population is disproportionately affected by diagnosis at later stage of disease due to systematic and healthcare factors. Such late diagnoses are associated with higher symptom burden among survivors; however, symptom burden among YA early-onset CRC (EOCRC) survivors is poorly understood. The present study aims to characterize symptom burden among YA EOCRC survivors. Methods: A cross sectional survey was administered online in collaboration with a national organization for YA CRC survivors. Respondents (18-49 years) were EOCRC survivors who were 6-36 months from diagnosis/relapse. Survivors endorsed symptoms they experienced among 23 common CRC late effects. Responses were stratified by symptom duration (6-18 versus 19-36 months) to examine differences in endorsement rates among respondents. Results: Respondents (n=235) were colon (n=86) and rectal (n=149) cancer survivors, primarily male 63%, diagnosed at 32.4 years (SD=6.65), with an average of 5.1 (SD=2.57) symptoms. Overall, the most highly reported symptoms were fatigue, perceived change in appearance after treatment, and nail color changes. Comparisons of 6-18 and 19-36 months-from-diagnosis groups revealed similar symptom endorsement rates, with those 19-36 months from diagnosis endorsing constipation/diarrhea, anal bleeding, and incisional discomfort at higher rates than those 6-18 months from diagnosis. The 6-18 and 19-36 months-from-diagnosis groups carried similar symptom burdens of 4.9 (SD=2.57) and 5.1 (SD=2.58), respectively. Conclusions: YA EOCRC survivors endorse numerous symptoms that may interfere with their daily living and quality of life. Similarities in endorsement between 6-18 month and 19-36-month groups suggest symptoms may become chronic and persist beyond cancer treatment. Fortunately, many symptoms can be mitigated or prevented with proper medical and/or psychosocial intervention, patient education, and resource availability. Providers can leverage these findings in their evaluation of YA EOCRC patients during treatment and follow-up care to ensure the delivery of optimal symptom management. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Julia Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sally Cohen-Cutler
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Afsaneh Barzi
- City of Hope National Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David R. Freyer
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Kimberly Ann Miller
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vassantachart A, Ragab O, Miller K, Lock D, Stal J, Bian SX, Jang J, Fossum C, Han HR, Mehta S, Cheng K, Ballas LK. Knowledge and Understanding of Radiation Therapy Among Patients With Breast Cancer From Culturally Diverse Backgrounds at a Safety-Net Hospital. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:176-181. [PMID: 36720316 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Comprehensive understanding of oncologic treatment is essential for shared decision-making. However, comprehension of information in radiation oncology consults is poorly understood, particularly among Spanish-speaking patients at safetynet hospitals. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine post-consultation radiation oncology knowledge and health literacy among breast cancer patients from culturally diverse backgrounds. METHODS After consultation for curative post-operative breast radiotherapy (cT1-4N1-3M0), the Radiation Oncology Knowledge Assessment Survey (ROKAS) was administered to Spanish- and English-speaking patients ≥ 18 years old, from January 2021 to January 2022 at a safety-net hospital. Radiation knowledge was assessed using the ROKAS which included eight radiation-specific multiple-choice questions and two separate questions regarding short- and long-term side effects. Additional independent variables included validated questionnaires related to health literacy, health numeracy, acculturation, primary language, and sociodemographic factors. Bivariate Pearson correlations and T-test analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between the independent variables and post-consultation radiation knowledge. RESULTS Fifty ROKAS were obtained from 25 English- and 25 Spanish-speaking breast cancer patients (median age 57 [IQR 49.75-62.25]). When compared to Englishspeaking patients, Spanish-speaking patients had lower health literacy, health numeracy, and acculturation. There was no difference in the multiple-choice ROKAS score between English- and Spanish-speakers, or correlation with the other independent factors. Higher health numeracy correlated with a higher accuracy for identifying short-term side effects. Lower accuracy of identifying long-term side effects was seen in patients with lower education levels, health literacy, health numeracy, and acculturation, with the most missed long-term side effects being arm swelling, skin toxicity, and heart toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Patients with low health literacy, health numeracy, acculturation, and education levels as well as Spanish-speaking patients were associated with poor understanding of radiotherapy long-term side effects. Determining barriers to radiation knowledge is crucial to improve shared decision-making between patients and providers in a culturally diverse population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Vassantachart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Omar Ragab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Kimberly Miller
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Derrick Lock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Julia Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Shelly X Bian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Julie Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Croix Fossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hye Ri Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Shahil Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Karen Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Leslie K Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Miller KA, Li AA, Wojcik KY, Stal J, Cockburn MG, In GK, Freyer DR, Hamilton AS, Milam JE. Prevalence and correlates of skin examination among ethnically diverse young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Cancer Med 2022; 12:8557-8566. [PMID: 36495004 PMCID: PMC10134373 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin cancer is the most common secondary malignancy among young adult childhood cancer survivors (YA-CCS). Skin examination to detect skin cancer early (including melanoma as well as basal or squamous cell skin cancers), both physician-based (PSE) and self-skin exam (SSE), is recommended, particularly for radiotherapy-exposed YA-CCS who are at high risk of developing skin cancer. METHODS Awareness and prevalence of skin examination and demographic, clinical, and healthcare correlates were examined in a population-based sample of YA-CCS with diverse cancer types excluding melanoma. Descriptive frequencies and logistic regression models were conducted using sample weights to correct for non-response bias with PSE, SSE and adherence to both as outcomes. RESULTS The sample comprised 1064 participants with 53% Latino. Eight percent of participants were aware of the need for skin examination; 9% reported receipt of PSE within past 2 years; 35% reported regular SSE; and 6% were adherent to both. Among the radiotherapy-treated, 10% were aware of the need for skin examination, 10% reported recent PSE; 38% reported regular SSE; and 8% were adherent to both. Healthcare and clinical factors including healthcare self-efficacy, engagement in cancer-related follow-up care, greater treatment intensity and greater number of treatment-related late effects were positively associated with PSE and SSE. Latino YA-CCS were less likely to engage in PSE and SSE. CONCLUSION(S) Adherence to recommended screening for skin cancer was low in this at-risk population, notably for YA-CCS exposed to radiotherapy. The development of effective strategies to expand skin cancer screening is needed in this at-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A. Miller
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
- Department of Dermatology Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - Angela A. Li
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - Katherine Y. Wojcik
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - Julia Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - Myles G. Cockburn
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
- Department of Dermatology Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
- Spatial Sciences Institute, Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - Gino K. In
- Department of Dermatology Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
- Department of Medicine Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Los Angeles California USA
| | - David R. Freyer
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Los Angeles California USA
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA
- Department of Pediatrics Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - Ann S. Hamilton
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - Joel E. Milam
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Program in Public Health, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center University of California Irvine California USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vassantachart A, Ballas L, Bian S, Lock D, Jang J, Fossum C, Han H, Mehta S, Cheng K, Miller K, Stal J, Ragab O. Do Patients Understand Radiation Therapy? Radiation Oncology Knowledge Assessment and Health Literacy among Culturally Diverse Breast Cancer Patients at a Safety-Net Hospital. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
12
|
Schneberk T, Bolshakova M, Sloan K, Chang E, Stal J, Dinalo J, Jimenez E, Motala A, Hempel S. Quality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:3147-3161. [PMID: 35260956 PMCID: PMC9485370 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07454-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare systems are increasingly implementing programs for high-need patients, who often have multiple chronic conditions and complex social situations. Little, however, is known about quality indicators that might guide healthcare organizations and providers in improving care for high-need patients. We sought to conduct a systematic review to identify potential quality indicators for high-need patients. METHODS This systematic review (CRD42020215917) searched PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE; guideline clearing houses ECRI and GIN; and Google scholar. We included publications suggesting, evaluating, and utilizing indicators to assess quality of care for high-need patients. Critical appraisal of the indicators addressed the development process, endorsement and adoption, and characteristics, such as feasibility. We standardized indicators by patient population subgroups to facilitate comparisons across different indicator groups. RESULTS The search identified 6964 citations. Of these, 1382 publications were obtained as full text, and 53 studies met inclusion criteria. We identified over 1700 quality indicators across studies. Quality indicator characteristics varied widely. The scope of the selected indicators ranged from detailed criterion (e.g., "annual eye exam") to very broad categories (e.g., "care coordination"). Some publications suggested disease condition-specific indicators (e.g., diabetes), some used condition-independent criteria (e.g., "documentation of the medication list in the medical record available to all care agencies"), and some publications used a mixture of indicator types. DISCUSSION We identified and evaluated existing quality indicators for a complex, heterogeneous patient group. Although some quality indicators were not disease-specific, we found very few that accounted for social determinants of health and behavioral factors. More research is needed to develop quality indicators that address patient risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd Schneberk
- Gehr Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, GNH 1011, 1200 N State Street Rm 1011, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| | - Maria Bolshakova
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kylie Sloan
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Evelyn Chang
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA
| | - Julia Stal
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Dinalo
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elvira Jimenez
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA
| | - Aneesa Motala
- Gehr Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, GNH 1011, 1200 N State Street Rm 1011, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Susanne Hempel
- Gehr Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, GNH 1011, 1200 N State Street Rm 1011, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stal J, Barzi A, Miller KA. In Reply to "Fertility Preservation in Young Adult Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Few Things to Consider". Oncologist 2022; 27:e823-e824. [PMID: 35972333 PMCID: PMC9526488 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Afsaneh Barzi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Kimberly A Miller
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Piombo SE, Stal J, Kagramanov D, Kysh L, Freyer DR, Turner BJ, Miller KA. Integrating primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059050. [PMID: 35577464 PMCID: PMC9115019 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improved treatment regimens have led to increased survival rates among childhood cancer survivors (CCS), and more than 84% of all children diagnosed with cancer will experience long-term survival or cure. Survivors are susceptible to late effects of cancer treatment often requiring lifelong follow-up care, as many of these conditions can be prevented or mitigated with surveillance. Integrating primary care (PC) and childhood cancer survivorship care can improve follow-up for survivors, however, little integrative research exists. This scoping review aims to: identify and describe existing models of care that integrate PC and childhood cancer survivorship care, examine the effectiveness of these models of care, and characterise the barriers and facilitators for the integration of PC for CCS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A comprehensive empirical literature search of three electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase) was employed to identify potentially relevant citations on 1 October 2020. The population, independent variables/intervention, comparator, outcomes, timing, setting and study design/other limiters (PICOTSS) framework was used to inform protocol development. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist and explanation will be used to report study findings. The search strategy will be completed again prior to publication to ensure recent empirical research is accounted for. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This research is exempt from Institutional Review Board (IRB) review. Approval from a research ethics board for this study was not required as it does not involve human participants or unpublished secondary data. The findings from this scoping review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts, clinical conference presentations, professional networks and digital communications using social media platforms such as Twitter. This study has been registered with Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/92xbg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Piombo
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Julia Stal
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dalia Kagramanov
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lynn Kysh
- Institute for Nursing and Interprofessional Research, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David R Freyer
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Barbara J Turner
- Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Research and Innovation, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kimberly A Miller
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stal J, Yi SY, Cohen-Cutler S, Gallagher P, Barzi A, Freyer DR, Milam JE, Lenz HJ, Miller KA. Fertility Preservation Discussions Between Young Adult Rectal Cancer Survivors and Their Providers: Sex-Specific Prevalence and Correlates. Oncologist 2022; 27:579-586. [PMID: 35427410 PMCID: PMC9255970 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adults (YA) diagnosed with rectal cancer are disproportionately impacted by the gonadotoxic effects of treatment and potential subsequent infertility. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to characterize the prevalence of fertility preservation measures used, reasons why such measures were not used, and correlates of discussion between providers and YA rectal cancer survivors. DESIGN An online, cross-sectional survey was administered on the Facebook page of a national colorectal cancer (CRC) advocacy organization. Eligible participants were rectal cancer survivors diagnosed before age 50, between 6 and 36 months from diagnosis or relapse, and based in the US. RESULTS Participants were 148 rectal cancer survivors. Over half of the survivors reported that their doctor did not talk to them about potential therapy-related fertility complications. Only one-fifth of survivors banked sperm (males) or eggs/embryos (females) prior to their cancer therapy. Older age at diagnosis and greater quality of life were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of fertility discussions among males. Greater quality of life was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of fertility discussion among females. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that the majority of YA rectal cancer survivors do not receive, or cannot recall, comprehensive cancer care, and help to identify patients with rectal cancer who may be at risk for inadequate fertility counseling. Clinicians should provide proper counseling to mitigate this late effect and to ensure optimal quality of life for YA rectal cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Stal
- Corresponding author: Julia Stal, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, 2001 N. Soto Street, 3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA. Tel: +1 858 997 4071;
| | - Serena Y Yi
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sally Cohen-Cutler
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Afsaneh Barzi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - David R Freyer
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA,University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joel E Milam
- School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Oncology, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kimberly A Miller
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yi S, Rodriguez K, Stal J, Cohen-Cutler S, Gallagher P, Barzi A, Freyer DR, Milam J, Lenz HJ, Miller KA. Prevalence of information needs among emerging and young adult colorectal cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
71 Background: The information needs of young adult (YA) cancer survivors have been described, however, the specific needs of YA colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors are not well-documented. Characterizing the distinct unmet needs of YA CRC survivors is important given their unique cancer experience which may include an ostomy, chronic bowel symptoms, and functional deficits. The purpose of this study was to examine CRC survivors’ unmet needs across general, clinical, and psychosocial domains. Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey was administered via Facebook in collaboration with a national YA CRC patient advocacy organization. Respondents (diagnosed 18-39) endorsed areas in which they required more information on aspects of their lives that may have been affected by their cancer experience. Needs were stratified by life stage (emerging [18-29 years] and young [30-39] adulthood). Results: Respondents (n=189) were colon (40.2%) and rectal (59.8%) cancer survivors with a mean current age of 32.2 years (SD=4.6) and a mean age of 30.2 years (SD=4.3) at diagnosis. Most endorsed items per domain included: nutrition and diet (52.1%), complementary and alternative treatments (45.4%), and talking about your cancer experience with family, friends, and co-workers (36.1%). Survivors in emerging adulthood (n=80), compared with those in young adulthood (n=109), endorsed notably greater needs in: staying physically fit (57.5% versus 38.5%), complementary and alternative treatments (57.5% versus 36.7%), and advice/help about dating and intimate relationships (18.8% versus 6.4%). Conclusions: Overall, half of respondents endorsed a desire for information on nutrition and diet, staying physically fit, and complementary and alternative treatments. Differing endorsement rates by age group indicate the importance of tailored approaches. Optimal counseling, resources, and referrals specific to life stage can mitigate the unmet needs of YA CRC survivors to improve health outcomes and quality of life.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Yi
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Julia Stal
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Afsaneh Barzi
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | | | - Joel Milam
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
McKinley LE, Hua S, Stal J, D'Eon MS, Afari N, Cronan TA. Predictors of Quality of Life Among Breast Cancer Patients. CALIF J HEALTH PROMOT 2021. [DOI: 10.32398/cjhp.v19i1.2642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Over 3.1 million women living in the U.S. have been diagnosed with breast cancer. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether stage of cancer, psychological distress, cognitive fusion (fusion of one’s thoughts and emotions), mindfulness, and resilience were related to quality of life among breast cancer patients. Participants were 24 women, aged 41-71, diagnosed with stage 0-3 breast cancer, recruited to participate in a pilot intervention study. All data for this study were collected at the baseline assessment. A multiple linear regression analysis explained 79.1% of the total variance in quality of life, F(5, 14) = 15.400, p < .001, Adjusted R2 = .791. Higher resilience significantly predicted higher quality of life (b = 2.392, p = .002), whereas higher stage of cancer (b = -8.068, p = .030) and higher levels of psychological distress (b = -1.737, p < .001) significantly predicted lower quality of life. Contrary to the hypotheses, higher levels of mindfulness significantly predicted lower quality of life (b = -0.612, p = .022). Cognitive fusion did not significantly predict quality of life (p > .05). More research is needed to determine how various factors predict quality of life among breast cancer patients.
Collapse
|
18
|
Stal J, Yi S, Cohen-Cutler S, Gallagher P, Barzi A, Milam J, Freyer DR, Lenz HJ, Miller KA. Prevalence of fertility discussions between young adult colorectal cancer survivors and their providers. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3518 Background: Clinical guidelines indicate that oncologists should discuss potential treatment-induced infertility with patients with reproductive potential. Due to tumor location and use of multimodal therapies, young adults with colorectal cancer (CRC) are at heightened risk for treatment-related infertility. Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey was administered in collaboration with a national patient advocacy organization for young adult CRC survivors (currently under age 50). Survivors were asked to indicate if a doctor had ever talked to them about potential problems with their ability to have children after treatment and if they banked eggs/embryos (females) or sperm (males) prior to their cancer therapy. Those who reported that they did not preserve fertility were asked to indicate why ( not sure; I chose not to; I did not know this was an option; I wanted to, but could not afford it; and I wanted to, but my treatment would not allow it). Results: A total of 234 colon (N=86) or rectal (N=148) cancer survivors were included in the study (male [61.9%] and White [77.9%; table]). Most respondents were diagnosed with stage 2 cancer (55.8% colon, 61.6% rectal). Over half of male and female survivors reported that their doctor did not talk to them about problems with their ability to have children after treatment, and 75% did not bank eggs/embryos or sperm prior to their cancer therapy. Of those, over 20% endorsed ‘I wanted to, but could not afford it’ and over 20% endorsed ‘I did not know this was an option’. Conclusions: Most CRC survivors in this study reported never having a fertility discussion with their provider, suggesting that survivors are not receiving, or cannot recall, comprehensive and guideline-concordant cancer care. In addition, one-fifth were not aware of preservation options, suggesting potential healthcare and/or provider-level barriers to appropriate fertility counseling. Fertility preservation cost is another barrier to the appropriate delivery of care. Providers must ensure that patients receive timely fertility discussions covering options to preserve fertility to mitigate this late effect of cancer treatment to ensure optimal quality of life for CRC patients with reproductive potential.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Stal
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Serena Yi
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Afsaneh Barzi
- USC Keck School of Medicine Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joel Milam
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Miller KA, Stal J, Gallagher P, Kaslander JN, Freyer DR, Marin P, Lenz HJ, Milam J, Barzi A. Health-related quality of life and time from diagnosis among young adult colorectal cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
34 Background: Incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients under 50 years of age is rising. Quality of life in survivorship is not well-described in this population. We compared health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in CRC survivors ≤ 50 years old who were 6-18 months or 19-36 months from initial diagnosis or relapse. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was administered in collaboration with a national organization for young CRC survivors. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-C) was used to measure HRQoL, which assesses HRQoL globally, including a CRC specific scale, and emotional, physical, social, and functional well-being domains. T-tests were conducted to compare HRQoL between survivors who were 6-18 months versus 19-36 months from diagnosis/relapse. Results: This sample (n=308) had a mean age of 33.76 SD±6.68; 201 (65.3%) were male; tumor location was colon or rectal in 41.7% and 58.3%, respectively. The majority (55.23%) were diagnosed with stage 2 disease; 98.0% were non-metastatic. 42.2% experienced relapse; 25% had an ostomy. Most survivors were 6-18 months (N=189; 61.4%) from diagnosis/relapse, and key demographics and disease characteristics did not significantly differ between those who were shorter versus longer time from diagnosis/relapse. The mean global HRQoL score was 67.3 out of a possible score of 136. Across domains, scores were low, with social well-being the highest (15.15/28) and emotional well-being the lowest (11.44/24). Social well-being was significantly higher among survivors who were 6-18 months from diagnosis/relapse compared to those 19-36 months (15.98 for 6-18 months vs. 13.83 for 19-36; p<0.01), as was functional well-being (13.20 for 6-18 months vs. 11.12 for 19-36; p<0.01). Emotional well-being and physical well-being did not significantly differ between groups. Conclusions: Overall HRQoL scores were low among younger CRC survivors, and social and functional well-being were significantly worse for those longer from diagnosis. Appropriate counseling and other targeted interventions are necessary to maintain HRQoL over time in this at-risk population. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julia Stal
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Joel Milam
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Afsaneh Barzi
- USC Keck School of Medicine Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|