1
|
Walter AE, DeWerd LA. Feasibility of implementing a megavoltage ionization chamber calibration service at the secondary standards level. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
|
2
|
Shaw M, Lye J, Alves A, Keehan S, Lehmann J, Hanlon M, Kenny J, Baines J, Porumb C, Geso M, Brown R. Characterisation of a synthetic diamond detector for end-to-end dosimetry in stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiosurgery. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 20:40-45. [PMID: 34722939 PMCID: PMC8536779 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Synthetic diamond detectors offer real time measurement of dose in radiotherapy applications which require high spatial resolution. Additional considerations and corrections are required for measurements where the diamond detector is orientated at various angles to the incident beam. This study investigated diamond detectors for end-to-end testing of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) in the context of dosimetry audits. MATERIAL AND METHODS Seven individual diamond detectors were investigated and compared with respect to warm up stability, dose-rate dependence, linearity, detector shadowing, energy response, cross-calibration, angular dependence and positional sensitivity in SBRT and SRS. RESULTS Large variation in the cross calibration factors was found between the seven individual detectors. For each detector, the energy dependence in the cross calibration factor was on average <0.6% across the beam qualities investigated (Co-60 Gamma Knife, and MV beams with TPR20,10 0.684-0.733). The angular corrections for individual fields were up to 5%, and varied with field size. However, the average angular dependence for all fields in a typical SRS treatment delivery was <1%. The overall measurement uncertainty was 3.6% and 3.1% (2σ) for an SRS and SBRT treatment plan respectively. CONCLUSION Synthetic diamond detectors were found to be reliable and robust for end-to-end dosimetry in SBRT and SRS applications. Orientation of the detector relative to the beam axis is an important consideration, as significant corrections are required for angular dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maddison Shaw
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC, Australia
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jessica Lye
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC, Australia
- Olivia Newtown John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Alves
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephanie Keehan
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC, Australia
| | - Joerg Lehmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Maximilian Hanlon
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC, Australia
| | - John Kenny
- Medical Physics Specialists, Health Stem Solutions, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John Baines
- Radiation Oncology, Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - Claudiu Porumb
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne VIC, Australia
| | - Moshi Geso
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rhonda Brown
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kupfer T, Lehmann J, Butler DJ, Ramanathan G, Bailey TE, Franich RD. Commissioning of a PTW 34070 large-area plane-parallel ionization chamber for small field megavoltage photon dosimetry. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:206-217. [PMID: 28980432 PMCID: PMC5689907 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigates a large-area plane-parallel ionization chamber (LAC) for measurements of dose-area product in water (DAPw ) in megavoltage (MV) photon fields. METHODS Uniformity of electrode separation of the LAC (PTW34070 Bragg Peak Chamber, sensitive volume diameter: 8.16 cm) was measured using high-resolution microCT. Signal dependence on angle α of beam incidence for square 6 MV fields of side length s = 20 cm and 1 cm was measured in air. Polarity and recombination effects were characterized in 6, 10, and 18 MV photons fields. To assess the lateral setup tolerance, scanned LAC profiles of a 1 × 1 cm2 field were acquired. A 6 MV calibration coefficient, ND,w,LAC , was determined in a field collimated by a 5 cm diameter stereotactic cone with known DAPw . Additional calibrations in 10 × 10 cm2 fields at 6, 10, and 18 MV were performed. RESULTS Electrode separation is uniform and agrees with specifications. Volume-averaging leads to a signal increase proportional to ~1/cos(α) in small fields. Correction factors for polarity and recombination range between 0.9986 to 0.9996 and 1.0007 to 1.0024, respectively. Off-axis displacement by up to 0.5 cm did not change the measured signal in a 1 × 1 cm2 field. ND,w,LAC was 163.7 mGy cm-2 nC-1 and differs by +3.0% from the coefficient derived in the 10 × 10 cm2 6 MV field. Response in 10 and 18 MV fields increased by 1.0% and 2.7% compared to 6 MV. CONCLUSIONS The LAC requires only small correction factors for DAPw measurements and shows little energy dependence. Lateral setup errors of 0.5 cm are tolerated in 1 × 1 cm2 fields, but beam incidence must be kept as close to normal as possible. Calibration in 10 × 10 fields is not recommended because of the LAC's over-response. The accuracy of relative point-dose measurements in the field's periphery is an important limiting factor for the accuracy of DAPw measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Kupfer
- School of ScienceRMIT UniversityMelbourneVic.Australia
- Radiation Oncology CentreAustin HealthHeidelbergVic.Australia
| | - Joerg Lehmann
- School of ScienceRMIT UniversityMelbourneVic.Australia
- Faculty of ScienceThe University of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNSWAustralia
| | - Duncan J. Butler
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety AgencyYallambieVic.Australia
| | - Ganesan Ramanathan
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety AgencyYallambieVic.Australia
| | - Tracy E. Bailey
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety AgencyYallambieVic.Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ganesan R, McEwen MR, Orton CG. Point/Counterpoint. Calibration of radiotherapy ionization chambers using Co-60 is outdated and should be replaced by direct calibration in linear accelerator beams. Med Phys 2015; 42:5003-6. [PMID: 26328950 DOI: 10.1118/1.4922710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ramanathan Ganesan
- Radiotherapy Section, Medical Radiation Services Branch, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Yallambie 3085, Victoria, Australia (Tel: 61 3 9433 2273; E-mail: )
| | - Malcolm R McEwen
- Ionizing Radiation Standards, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OR6, Canada (Tel: 613-993-2197 Ext: 226; E-mail: )
| | | |
Collapse
|