The efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab in previously treated patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (ns-NSCLC)

Anti-angiogenesis: Opening a new window for immunotherapy

The tumor microenvironment (TME) provides a guarantee for the survival and development of solid tumors. In recent years, treatment strategies for TME have set off a great upsurge in the field of cancer research. Tumor angiogenesis and tumor immune microenvironment are two important research branches of TME, and antiangiogenic therapy and immunotherapy have gradually become one important focus of cancer treatment research. More interestingly, increasing number of studies have indicated that there are complex regulatory interactions between the two treatment strategies, with multiple regulatory mechanisms involved. Based on these findings, clinical studies on the combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy have also been carried out gradually. This combination strategy has shown good results in many types of tumors, but it also faces many challenges. The paper analysed the potential mechanism of the immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy combination, discussed the latest significant clinical trial progress and the existing challenges and problems, aiming to offer some available insights on the effective clinical application of this combination pattern.

First-line pemetrexed-platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world propensity score-matched study in China

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of first-line bevacizumab (Bev)-containing pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy in a real-world Chinese cohort with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 415 eligible patients with NS-NSCLC who received first-line pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy at National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between February 2010 and September 2017 were reviewed retrospectively: 309 Bev(-) and 106 Bev(+) cases. Bev was administered at 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks in the Bev(+) group. To reduce the risk of a selection bias, a propensity score-matching (PSM) was conducted and 105 pairs of Bev(-) and Bev(+) cases were identified.

Results

The median duration of follow-up was 15.8 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged significantly in the Bev(+) group than in the Bev(-) group in overall (9.8vs. 7.8 months, P=0.006) and PSM pairs (9.8 vs. 6.6 months, P<0.001). Moreover, patients receiving maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus Bev had longer PFS than those interrupted after induction chemotherapy, or those receiving mono-maintenance with pemetrexed (12.3vs. 4.8 vs. 8.6 months; P<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed Bev to be one of the favorable prognostic factors for PFS, along with the predictor of maintenance therapy.

Conclusions

First-line induction and maintenance therapy with Bev (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) combined with pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy was efficacious and superior to non-Bev chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced NS-NSCLC.

Comparison of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab vs. chemotherapy alone as third-line treatment or beyond for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy has demonstrated efficacy as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether this combination is effective as a salvage treatment for patients with NSCLC remains unclear. The present retrospective study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with chemotherapy alone as a third-line, or continuing, treatment for patients with NSCLC. Between January 2011 and June 2016, a total of 38 patients with stage IV NSCLC who had received chemotherapy plus bevacizumab subsequent to failure of ≥2 prior regimens were matched with 38 patients who had received chemotherapy alone using propensity score matching from a dataset of 165 patients. The variables that were analyzed included age, sex, smoking history, histology, epithelial growth factor receptor mutation status, number of prior regimens and type of chemotherapy regimen. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic factors for survival outcomes and tumor response, and toxicity analyses were performed. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were improved in patients who underwent chemotherapy-bevacizumab treatment compared with chemotherapy alone (ORR, 23.7 vs. 5.3%, P<0.001; DCR, 65.8 vs. 31.6%, P<0.001). Progression-free survival was prolonged in the chemotherapy-bevacizumab group compared with the chemotherapy-alone group (median, 3.9 vs. 2.2 months; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32–0.89, P=0.014). Incidence of ≥grade 3 adverse events was low and similar across the groups. The combination of chemotherapy and bevacizumab is a potentially effective and safe alternative salvage treatment for patients with NSCLC who have not received bevacizumab treatment previously.

A retrospective analysis of cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often have an advanced disease when firstly diagnosed. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in previously treated advanced NSCLC. Results showed that the objective response rate(ORR) of this novel regimen is 43%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 6.7 months) and median overall survival (OS) was 11.4 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 13.9 months). Adverse events were generally mild, ranging from grade 1 to grade 3. In conclusion, the combination of cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab obtained promising results in selected patients with NSCLC. Randomized clinical trials are needed to further investigate the efficacy of this regimen.

Hemocompatibility of folic-acid-conjugated amphiphilic PEG-PLGA copolymer nanoparticles for co-delivery of cisplatin and paclitaxel: treatment effects for non-small-cell lung cancer

In this study, we used folic-acid-modified poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (FA-PEG-PLGA) to encapsulate cisplatin and paclitaxel (separately or together), and evaluated their antitumor effects against lung cancer; this study was conducted in order to investigate the antitumor effects of the co-delivery of cisplatin and paclitaxel by a targeted drug delivery system. Blood compatibility assays and complement activation tests revealed that FA-PEG-PLGA nanoparticles did not induce blood hemolysis, blood clotting, or complement activation. The results also indicated that FA-PEG-PLGA nanoparticles had no biotoxic effects, the drug delivery system allowed controlled release of the cargo molecules, and the co-delivery of cisplatin and paclitaxel efficiently induces cancer cell apoptosis and cell cycle retardation. In addition, co-delivery of cisplatin and paclitaxel showed the ability to suppress xenograft lung cancer growth and prolong the survival time of xenografted mice. These results implied that FA-PEG-PLGA nanoparticles can function as effective carriers of cisplatin and paclitaxel, and that co-delivery of cisplatin and paclitaxel by FA-PEG-PLGA nanoparticles results in more effective antitumor effects than the combination of free-drugs or single-drug-loaded nanoparticles.

Different roles of myofibroblasts in the tumorigenesis of nonsmall cell lung cancer

Myofibroblasts play a critical role in the cancer cell growth, invasion, and tumor-associated vascularization during the carcinogenesis of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas the underlying molecular bases are not completely understood. We isolated Lin-negative, Sca1-low, and CD49e-high myofibroblasts from the NSCLC tissues of the patients and modified the levels of either transforming growth factor β 1 (TGFβ1) or vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) in these cells. We found that coculture with TGFβ1-overexpressing myofibroblasts significantly decreased the NSCLC cell growth in an MTT assay through proliferation suppression rather than modulation of cell apoptosis, while significantly increased the NSCLC cell invasiveness in either a transwell migration assay or a scratch wound healing migration assay. However, modulation of TGFβ1 levels in myofibroblasts did not significantly alter vessel formation in a human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) transwell collagen gel assay. On the other hand, overexpression of VEGF-A in myofibroblasts significantly increased vessel formation in the HUVECs transwell collagen gel assay. Together, these data suggest that myofibroblasts may regulate cancer cell growth and invasion through TGFβ1 but modulate cancer-associated neovascularization through VEGF-A. Hence, targeting different signaling pathways in myofibroblasts may delicately control NSCLC growth and invasion.