Long-term Effects of Mitiglinide in Japanese Diabetics Inadequately Controlled with DPP-4 Inhibitor or Biguanide Monotherapy

Efficacy and safety of nateglinide plus sitagliptin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled by sitagliptin monotherapy: a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, long-term study

BACKGROUND

Combination therapies of drugs with distinct mechanisms of action are emerging as ways to achieve strict glycemic control, thus preventing the onset and progression of diabetic complications in type 2 diabetes patients. A rapid-acting insulin secretagog, nateglinide, and a potent dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, meet such criteria.

METHODS

A total of 121 patients inadequately controlled with sitagliptin monotherapy received 52-week combination therapy (nateglinide + sitagliptin). The primary endpoint was the safety of the therapy, and its efficacy was also evaluated. A meal tolerance test was performed 4 weeks before the start of combination therapy (week -4) and at week 24 and week 52 after the start of combination therapy.

RESULTS

HbA1c levels were lower at week 52 than at week 0 [-0.42% (95% confidence interval -0.53, -0.31)]. Fasting plasma glucose levels tended to decrease from baseline (week 0) to week 52 [-4.8 mg/dl (-9.4, -0.2)]. In the meal tolerance test, postprandial plasma glucose levels and area under the curve of glucose from before to 2 h after the meal load were lower at week 24 and week 52 than at week -4. In addition, the levels of insulin and active glucagon-like peptide-1 were higher at week 52 than at week -4. Furthermore, the incidence of adverse events in combination therapy with sitagliptin was similar to those previously shown in nateglinide monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Compared with sitagliptin monotherapy, the combination therapy of nateglinide plus sitagliptin was more effective in type 2 diabetes patients at improving glycemic control while showing similar safety.

Add-on treatment with mitiglinide improves residual postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetic patients receiving the combination therapy with insulin glargine and sitagliptin

The combination of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and a long-acting insulin analogue is widely used in clinical practice. However, some patients fail to achieve lower postprandial hyperglycemia. Mitiglinide, a short-acting insulinotropic sulfonylurea receptor ligand, is effective for postprandial hyperglycemia. Recently, it has been reported that the combination therapy of mitiglinide with a DPP-4 inhibitor could improve glycemic control. However, the efficacy of those under long-acting insulin analogue therapy remains to be investigated. Thus, we conducted a prospective single-center study of eight Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving mitiglinide added to the combination therapy of sitagliptin and insulin glargine, and evaluated its efficacy and safety by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Participants' (four men and four women) mean age was 70.3 ± 10.6 years. Their mean body mass index, HbA1c level, and urinary C-peptide level were 22.0 ± 2.8 kg/m(2), 9.2 ± 1.2%, and 50.0 ± 31.4 μg/day, respectively. CGM showed that as compared with the combination of only sitagliptin and insulin glargine, mitiglinide in combination with sitagliptin and insulin glargine significantly reduced glycemic fluctuation indices, total area for the range of 24-h glycemic fluctuations (p = 0.04), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (p = 0.03), and the proportion of time in hyperglycemia (p = 0.02) without significant difference in the proportion of time in hypoglycemia (p = 0.18). Hence, we have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the add-on treatment with mitiglinide in type 2 diabetic patients, receiving the combination therapy of sitagliptin and insulin glargine.

Efficacy of mitiglinide and sitagliptin, alone or in combination, on postprandial excursion and glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring: a post hoc analysis with single-day treatment

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of mitiglinide and sitagliptin, alone or in combination, on postprandial excursion and glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a single-day treatment setting.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized crossover study comparing the efficacy of sitagliptin, mitiglinide and the combination of these two drugs. Twenty-four hour CGM was performed before and after a single-day treatment with each drug alone or in combination.

RESULTS

Mean glucose levels were decreased in all groups. The average of three postprandial glucose excursions AUC (average of all three 4-h postprandial periods throughout the day) (AUCpp-average) decreased in the mitiglinide and combination treatment groups, but not in the sitagliptin group. The lowering effect on AUCpp-average was greater in patients given mitiglinide (-47 mg/dl, p < 0.001) or combination treatment (-66 mg/dl, p < 0.001) compared with sitagliptin alone (-18 mg/dl). The reduction in mean amplitude of glycemic excursion was greater with mitiglinide (-29.3 mg/dl, p < 0.001) and combination treatment (-28.3 mg/dl, p < 0.01) than with sitagliptin alone (-8.9 mg/dl).

CONCLUSIONS

Mitiglinide or combination treatment resulted in lower glycemic variability and postprandial glucose excursion than sitagliptin alone; however, the results of this single-day pharmacodynamics study cannot be generalized to a clinical setting.

Glycemic/metabolic responses to identical meal tolerance tests at breakfast, lunch and dinner in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and the effects of adding a mitiglinide/voglibose fixed-dose combination

BACKGROUND

The effects of the mitiglinide/voglibose fixed-dose combination on postprandial glycemic/metabolic responses in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are unknown.

METHODS

Twelve T2DM patients treated with a DPP-4 inhibitor underwent identical meal tolerance tests (MTTs) at breakfast, lunch and dinner, before and 2 - 3 weeks after treatment with a fixed-dose combination of mitiglinide 10 mg and voglibose 0.2 mg (combination). Patients were randomized in a cross-over fashion to administer the combination either three-times-daily before each meal or twice-daily before breakfast and dinner. Glycemic/metabolic responses were evaluated at 0, 30, 60 and 120 min in each MTT.

RESULTS

Three-times-daily administration of the combination significantly suppressed postprandial hyperglycemia after each meal, particularly after lunch and dinner. Active glucagon-like peptide-1 levels increased significantly after each meal, as did early-phase insulin secretion without excessive insulin secretion. Postprandial hyperglycemia after lunch was significantly greater after twice-daily than three-times-daily administration, but there were no clinically relevant differences in other metabolic responses.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that adding the mitiglinide/voglibose combination to a DPP-4 inhibitor elicited additive improvements in postprandial glycemic/metabolic responses assessed using MTTs at breakfast, lunch and dinner with identical meal compositions.