1
|
Ardito F, Lai Q, Savelli A, Grassi S, Panettieri E, Clemente G, Nuzzo G, Oliva A, Giuliante F. Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy: delayed referral to a tertiary care center is strongly associated with malpractice litigation. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:374-383. [PMID: 36739266 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bile duct injury (BDI) following cholecystectomy is associated with malpractice litigation. Aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for litigation in patients with BDI referred in a tertiary care center. METHODS Patients treated for BDI between 1994 and 2016. Stabilized inverse probability therapy weighting was used and multivariable logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for malpractice litigation. RESULTS Of the 211 treated patients, 98 met the inclusion criteria: early-referral group (<20 days; 51.0%), late-referral (≥20 days; 49.0%). 36 patients (36.7%) initiated malpractice litigation with verdict in favor of plaintiff in 86.7% of cases (median payment = €90 500, up to €600 000). Attempts at surgical and endoscopic repair before referral were significantly higher in late-referral group. Failed postoperative management (delayed referral, attempts at repair before referral) was one of the strongest predictors for litigation. Risk of litigation progressively increased from 23.8%, when referral time was within 19 days, to 54.5% (61-120 days), to 60.0% (121-210 days) and to 65.1% (211-365 days). DISCUSSION Litigation rate after BDI was 37%. Delayed referral to tertiary care center was one of the strongest predictors for litigation. Prompt referral to tertiary experienced centers without any attempt at repair may reduce the risk of litigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Alida Savelli
- Department of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Grassi
- Department of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Clemente
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nuzzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Oliva
- Department of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sauder N, Emara AK, Rullán PJ, Molloy RM, Krebs VE, Piuzzi NS. Hip & Knee Are the Most Litigated Orthopaedic Cases: A Nationwide 5-Year Analysis of Medical Malpractice Claims. J Arthroplasty 2022:S0883-5403(22)01027-0. [PMID: 36526101 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 80% of hip and knee surgeons will face malpractice litigation. Understanding contemporary reasons for litigation and legal outcomes in our field may help surgeons deliver more effective and satisfying care, while limiting their legal exposure. This study aimed to determine: 1) which orthopaedic subspecialties were most frequently litigated; 2) malpractice damages and negligence claimed; 3) the proportion of different case outcomes; and 4) factors associated with defense verdicts. METHODS A nationwide database was queried for all orthopaedic medical malpractice claims (2015 to 2020), obtaining 164 claims from 17 states. Variables included were as follows: case outcome, indemnity payment, damages, negligence claimed, treatment, and patient characteristics. A binary logistic regression determined if any collected variable increased the likelihood of a defense verdict. RESULTS Hip and knee cases were the highest-represented (n = 49, 29.9%; knee: n = 26, 15.9%; hip: n = 23, 14.0%), followed by the spine (n = 36; 22.0%), trauma (n = 29;17.7%), hand and wrist (n = 16; 9.8%), sports (n = 16; 9.1%), foot and ankle (n = 7; 4.3%), pediatric (n = 6; 3.7%), and shoulder (n = 6; 3.7%). Within hip and knee surgery, defense verdicts occurred in 38 cases (77.6%), while 9 (18.4%) resulted in plaintiff verdicts (mean payment: $4,866,929) and 2 (4.1%) resulted in settlements (mean settlement: $1,550,000). Nonreversible damages (eg, paralysis, amputation, and death; P < .001) were associated with a decreased likelihood of a defense outcome. CONCLUSION Hip and knee cases were the highest-represented in orthopaedic malpractice litigation. Surgeons were more frequently found negligent when nonreversible damages occurred. Orthopaedic surgeons should be cognizant of litigation patterns while ensuring patient-centered high-quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Sauder
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ahmed K Emara
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Pedro J Rullán
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Robert M Molloy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Viktor E Krebs
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tomihara H, Tomimaru Y, Hashimoto K, Fukuchi N, Yokoyama S, Mori T, Tanemura M, Sakai K, Takeda Y, Tsujie M, Yamada T, Miyamoto A, Hashimoto Y, Hatano H, Shimizu J, Sugimoto K, Kashiwazaki M, Matsumoto K, Kobayashi S, Doki Y, Eguchi H. Preoperative risk score to predict subtotal cholecystectomy after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: Secondary analysis of data from a multi-institutional retrospective study (CSGO-HBP-017B). Asian J Endosc Surg 2022; 15:555-562. [PMID: 35302288 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) has become recognized as a "bailout procedure" to prevent bile duct injury in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Predictors of conversion to STC have not been identified because LC difficulty varies based on pericholecystic inflammation. We analyzed data from patients enrolled in a previously performed multi-institutional retrospective study of the optimal timing of LC after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis (AC). These patients presumably had a considerable degree of pericholecystic inflammation. METHODS In total, 347 patients who underwent LC after gallbladder drainage for AC were analyzed to examine preoperative and perioperative factors predicting conversion to STC. RESULTS Three hundred patients underwent total cholecystectomy (TC) and 47 underwent conversion to STC. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (P < .01), severity of cholecystitis (P = .04), previous history of treatment for common bile duct stones (CBDS) (P < .01), and surgeon experience (P = .03) were significantly associated with conversion to STC. Logistic regression analyses showed that ECOG PS (odds ratio 0.2; P < .0001) and previous history of treatment for CBDS (odds ratio 0.37; P = .0073) were independent predictors of conversion to STC. Our predictive risk score using these two variables suggested that a score ≥2 could discriminate between TC and STC (P < .0001). CONCLUSION Poor ECOG PS and previous history of treatment for CBDS were significantly associated with conversion to STC after gallbladder drainage for AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideo Tomihara
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nara Hospital, Kindai University, Ikoma, Japan.,Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshito Tomimaru
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Hashimoto
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nara Hospital, Kindai University, Ikoma, Japan.,Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nariaki Fukuchi
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Shigekazu Yokoyama
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Takuji Mori
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Tane General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tanemura
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenji Sakai
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaka Takeda
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Masanori Tsujie
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nara Hospital, Kindai University, Ikoma, Japan.,Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan
| | - Terumasa Yamada
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Higashiosaka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Miyamoto
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, Sakai, Japan
| | - Yasuji Hashimoto
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan
| | - Hisanori Hatano
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Ashiya Municipal Hospital, Ashiya, Japan
| | - Junzo Shimizu
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan
| | - Keishi Sugimoto
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Kawanishi City Hospital, Kawanishi, Japan
| | - Masaki Kashiwazaki
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Otemae Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenichi Matsumoto
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Group, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Effects of Individualized Nursing Based on Zero-Defect Theory on Perioperative Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. DISEASE MARKERS 2022; 2022:5086350. [PMID: 35607441 PMCID: PMC9124088 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5086350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study is aimed at analyzing the effects of individualized nursing based on the zero-defect theory on perioperative patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods 174 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from 1st November 2019 to 30th November 2020 were enrolled as the research subjects and randomly divided into control and observation groups. The patients in the control group received conventional perioperative nursing care, and the patients in the observation group were treated with individualized nursing based on the zero-defect theory. Results The heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, and systolic blood pressure level of patients in two groups after nursing decreased significantly, and the reduction in the observation group was more significant than that in the control group. The depression and anxiety scores of the two groups after nursing were decreased, and the decrease in the observation group was significantly greater than that in the control group. The time to first postoperative exhaust, return to normal intake, out-of-bed activity, and hospital stay in the observation group was less than that in the control group. The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was substantially lower than that in the control group. The satisfaction degree of nursing care in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group. Conclusion Individualized nursing care based on zero-defect theory can effectively reduce the perioperative psychological stress response of patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It helps to improve the negative emotions of depression and anxiety, promotes the recovery of disease, reduces postoperative complications, and improves nursing satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lunevicius R, Nzenwa IC, Mesri M. A nationwide analysis of gallbladder surgery in England between 2000 and 2019. Surgery 2021; 171:276-284. [PMID: 34782153 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no reports on nationwide trends in subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) and cholecystostomy in England. We hypothesized that, as in the United States, a substantial increase in the utilization of these surgical procedures, over time, may be observed. We aimed to generate a reliable report on 4 of the most common gallbladder surgical procedures in England to allow cross-procedure comparisons and highlight significant changes in the management of benign gallbladder disease over time. METHODS We obtained data from NHS Digital and extracted population estimates from the Office of National Statistics. We examined the trends in the use of STC, cholecystostomy, cholecystolithotomy and total cholecystectomy (TC) between 2000 and 2019. RESULTS Of the 1,234,319 gallbladder surgeries performed, TC accounted for 96.8% (n = 1,194,786) and the other 3 surgeries for 3.2% (n = 39,533). The total number of gallbladder surgeries performed annually increased by 80.4% from 2000 to 2019. We detected increases in the counts of cholecystostomies by 723.1% (n = 290 in 2000 vs n = 2,387 in 2019) and STCs by 716.6% (n = 217 in 2000 vs n = 1,772 in 2019). Consequently, there was a decrease in the ratio of TC to STC (180:1 in 2000 vs 38:1 in 2019). A similar decrease was observed in the ratio of cholecystectomy to cholecystostomy (135:1 in 2000 vs 29:1 in 2019). CONCLUSION Increased utilization of STC and cholecystostomy was detected in England. These findings highlight the importance of regular monitoring of nationwide trends in gallbladder surgery and the associated clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raimundas Lunevicius
- Department of General Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Ikemsinachi C Nzenwa
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK. https://twitter.com/ICNzenwaMesri
| | - Mina Mesri
- North West Schools of Surgery, Health Education England, Liverpool, UK. https://twitter.com/MinaMesri
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cirocchi R, Panata L, Griffiths EA, Tebala GD, Lancia M, Fedeli P, Lauro A, Anania G, Avenia S, Di Saverio S, Burini G, De Sol A, Verdelli AM. Injuries during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Scoping Review of the Claims and Civil Action Judgements. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10225238. [PMID: 34830520 PMCID: PMC8622805 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. To define what type of injuries are more frequently related to medicolegal claims and civil action judgments. Methods. We performed a scoping review on 14 studies and 2406 patients, analyzing medicolegal claims related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy injuries. We have focalized on three phases associated with claims: phase of care, location of injuries, type of injuries. Results. The most common phase of care associated with litigation was the improper intraoperative surgical performance (47.6% ± 28.3%), related to a “poor” visualization, and the improper post-operative management (29.3% ± 31.6%). The highest rate of defense verdicts was reported for the improper post-operative management of the injury (69.3% ± 23%). A lower rate was reported in the incorrect presurgical assessment (39.7% ± 24.4%) and in the improper intraoperative surgical performance (21.39% ± 21.09%). A defense verdict was more common in cystic duct injuries (100%), lower in hepatic bile duct (42.9%) and common bile duct (10%) injuries. Conclusions. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the most common cause of claims, associated with lower rate of defense verdict, was the improper intraoperative surgical performance. The decision to take legal action was determined often for poor communication after the original incident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy; (R.C.); (M.L.); (S.A.)
| | - Laura Panata
- Legal Medicine and Insurance Office, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 06129 Perugia, Italy; (L.P.); (A.M.V.)
| | - Ewen A. Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK;
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Giovanni D. Tebala
- Surgical Emergency Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK;
| | - Massimo Lancia
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy; (R.C.); (M.L.); (S.A.)
| | - Piergiorgio Fedeli
- School of Law, Legal Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy;
| | - Augusto Lauro
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Hospital “Policlinico Umberto I”, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Gabriele Anania
- Department of Medical Science, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Stefano Avenia
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy; (R.C.); (M.L.); (S.A.)
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, ASUR Marche, AV5, Hospital of San Benedetto del Tronto, 63074 San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy;
| | - Gloria Burini
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Hospital “Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-3465700300
| | - Angelo De Sol
- Department of General Surgery, St. Maria Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy;
| | - Anna Maria Verdelli
- Legal Medicine and Insurance Office, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 06129 Perugia, Italy; (L.P.); (A.M.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nzenwa IC, Mesri M, Lunevicius R. Risks associated with subtotal cholecystectomy and the factors influencing them: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies published between 1985 and 2020. Surgery 2021; 170:1014-1023. [PMID: 33926707 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subtotal cholecystectomy is recognized as a rescue procedure performed in grossly suboptimal circumstances that would deem a total cholecystectomy too risky to execute. An earlier systematic review based on 30 studies published between 1985 and 2013 concluded that subtotal cholecystectomy had a morbidity rate comparable to that of total cholecystectomy. This systematic review appraises 17 clinical outcomes in patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy. METHODS The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (CRD42020172808). MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane bibliographic databases, and Google Scholar were used to identify papers published between 1985 and June 2020. Data related to the surgical setting, approach, intervention on the hepatic wall of the gallbladder, type of completion of subtotal cholecystectomy, year of study, and study design were collected. Seventeen clinical outcomes were considered. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model, and the effect size was presented as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS From 1,017 records, 85 eligible studies were identified and included. These included 3,645 patients who underwent subtotal cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic (80.1%, n = 2,918) and reconstituting (74.6%, n = 2,719) approaches represented the majority of all subtotal cholecystectomy cases. Seven (0.2%) cases of injury to the bile duct were reported. Bile leak was reported in 506 (13.9%) patients. Reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy was associated with a lower risk for 11 clinical outcomes. Open subtotal cholecystectomy was associated with an increased rate of 30-day mortality and wound infections. CONCLUSION Subtotal cholecystectomy is associated with significant morbidity. Laparoscopic and reconstituting surgery may reduce the risks of some perioperative complications and long-term sequelae after subtotal cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mina Mesri
- North West Schools of Surgery, Health Education England, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Raimundas Lunevicius
- Department of General Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tang OY, Hartnett DA, Hays SB, Syed S, Daniels AH. Determinants of brain tumor malpractice litigation outcome and indemnity payments: a 29-year nationwide analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 49:E21. [DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.focus20601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEMedical malpractice litigation is a significant challenge in neurosurgery, with more than 25% of a neurosurgeon’s career on average spent with an open malpractice claim. While earlier research has elucidated characteristics of litigation related to brain tumor treatment, factors impacting outcome and indemnity payment amount are incompletely understood.METHODSThe authors identified all medical malpractice cases related to brain tumors from 1988 to 2017 in VerdictSearch, a database of 200,000 cases from all 50 states. The outcome for each case was dichotomized from the perspective of the defendant physician as favorable (defendant victory) or unfavorable (plaintiff victory or settlement). Indemnity payments were recorded for cases that resulted in settlement or plaintiff victory. Univariate regression was used to assess the association between case characteristics and case outcome as well as indemnity payment amount. Subsequently, significant variables were used to generate multivariate models for each outcome. Statistical significance was maintained at p < 0.05.RESULTSA total of 113 cases were analyzed, resulting most commonly in defendant (physician) victory (46.9%), followed by settlement and plaintiff victory (both 26.5%). The most common specialty of the primary defendant was neurosurgery (35.4%), and the most common allegation was improper diagnosis (59.3%). Indemnity payments totaled $191,621,392, with neurosurgical defendants accounting for $109,000,314 (56.9%). The average payments for cases with a plaintiff victory ($3,333,654) and for settlements ($3,051,832) did not significantly differ (p = 0.941). The highest rates of unfavorable outcomes were observed among radiologists (63.6%) and neurosurgeons (57.5%) (p = 0.042). On multivariate regression, severe disability was associated with a lower odds of favorable case outcome (OR 0.21, p = 0.023), while older plaintiff age (> 65 years) predicted higher odds of favorable outcome (OR 5.75, p = 0.047). For 60 cases resulting in indemnity payment, higher payments were associated on univariate analysis with neurosurgeon defendants (β-coefficient = 2.33, p = 0.017), whether the plaintiff underwent surgery (β-coefficient = 2.11, p = 0.012), and the plaintiff experiencing severe disability (β-coefficient = 4.30, p = 0.005). Following multivariate regression, only medical outcome was predictive of increased indemnity payments, including moderate disability (β-coefficient = 4.98, p = 0.007), severe disability (β-coefficient = 6.96, p = 0.001), and death (β-coefficient = 3.23, p = 0.027).CONCLUSIONSNeurosurgeons were the most common defendants for brain tumor malpractice litigation, averaging more than $3 million per claim paid. Older plaintiff age was associated with case outcome in favor of the physician. Additionally, medical outcome was predictive of both case outcome and indemnity payment amount.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Y. Tang
- 1The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence; and
| | - Davis A. Hartnett
- 1The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence; and
| | - Sarah B. Hays
- 1The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence; and
| | | | - Alan H. Daniels
- 3Orthopedics, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to examine colorectal cancer (CRC) malpractice suits over the past 20 years in the United States and evaluate the most common allegations, lawsuit outcomes, indemnity payment amounts, patient outcomes, and physician characteristics. METHODS The malpractice section of VerdictSearch, a legal database, was queried for cases in which CRC was a principle component of the lawsuit. Legal notes were used to characterize plaintiff allegations, verdict, financial compensation, and case year. Clinical history for each case were analyzed for patient demographics, medical outcomes, and physician characteristics. RESULTS A total of 240 CRC-related malpractice cases (1988-2018) were collected, resulting in defense (n = 101, 42.1%), plaintiff (n = 37, 15.4%), or settlement (n = 96, 40%) verdict. The primary defendants were often primary care physicians (n = 61, 25.4%) and gastroenterologists (n = 55, 22.9%). Most common plaintiff allegations are failure to perform diagnostic colonoscopy for patients with symptoms (n = 67, 27.9%), failure to perform screening colonoscopy according to screening guidelines (n = 46, 19.2%), or failure to detect CRC with colonoscopy (n = 45, 18.7%). A common alleged error in diagnosis before the median year of 2005 was failure to detect CRC by the noncolonoscopic methods (<2005: n = 22, 24.2%; >2005: n = 3, 3.09%). DISCUSSION Plaintiff-alleged errors in diagnosis are consistently the most common reason for CRC malpractice litigation in the past 20 years, whereas specific diagnostic allegations (i.e., failure to screen vs failure to detect) and methods used for surveillance may vary over time. It is important to identify such pitfalls in CRC screening and explore areas for improvement to maximize patient care and satisfaction and reduce physician malpractice litigations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Hartnett DA, DeFroda SF, Ahmed SA, Eltorai AEM, Blankenhorn B, Daniels AH. Malpractice claims associated with foot surgery. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2020; 12:8439. [PMID: 32391135 PMCID: PMC7206365 DOI: 10.4081/or.2020.8439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery of the foot constitutes a substantial portion of orthopedic procedures, performed by both orthopedic surgeons and doctors of podiatric medicine. Little research exists on the medicolegal implications of foot surgery amongst these specialties. This study seeks to investigate the different medical and legal factors associated with foot surgery-based malpractice litigation. Malpractice data between 2004 and 2017 was collected using the VerdictSearch legal database. Cases involving foot surgery were identified, and case information including physician specialty, procedure, medical outcome, verdict, and payment amount were obtained. A total of 72 cases were analyzed. A majority of lawsuits involved podiatrists (76.4%), with orthopedic surgeons accounting for 15.3%. Lawsuits against podiatrists primarily occurred over elective procedures (94.5%) and most frequently involved plaintiff complaints of persistent pain (41.8%) or deformation (27.3%). Podiatrist cases most often involved allegations of failure to treat (45.5%) or inappropriate surgical procedure (27.3%). Orthopedic surgeons saw higher rates of urgent cases (45.5%), with surgical complications (27.3%) occurring at higher rates than podiatrists. Despite different trends in case types, similar rates of plaintiff victories, and mean payments were seen between podiatrists (25.5%, $911,884 ± 1,145,345) and orthopedic surgeons (27.3%, $975,555 ± 448,795). This investigation is the first to analyze malpractice trends amongst podiatrists and orthopedic surgeons. Differing factors related to medical and legal outcomes can suggest quality improvement targets for both specialties. This data may assist in reducing malpractice risk and refining patient care, particularly with regards to outlining risks, benefits, and alternatives during pre-operative counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davis A Hartnett
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Steven F DeFroda
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Shaan A Ahmed
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Adam E M Eltorai
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Brad Blankenhorn
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|