1
|
Kawahara W, Vega EA, Salehi O, Mellado S, Salirrosas O, Freeman R, Panettieri E, Conrad C. Laparoscopic Dissection of Lymph Node Station 16-Why and How? Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3003-3004. [PMID: 38411760 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15040-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dissection of para-aortic lymph nodes (Station 16) provides an important prognosticator for patients with gastrointestinal, colorectal, and hepatobiliary cancers.1-4 For example, a positive Station 16 lymph node has been shown to lead to 2-year survival of 3% in patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma, akin to stage IV disease.5,6 Thereby, Station 16 involvement can help with the risk/benefit stratification of the decision to move forward with radical surgery.7-9 Furthermore, it has been shown for gallbladder cancer that involvement of Station 16 cannot necessarily be predicted from the dissection of the hepatoduodenal ligament lymph nodes only.10,11 TECHNIQUE: With the patient in the French position, a complete Kocherization and a Cattel-Braasch maneuver is performed, allowing for visualization of LN station 16b. Station 16b is the inferior border of the station 16 compartment. The left renal vein (LRV) serves as an important landmark to identify the superior border of the dissection comprised by Stations 16a2 and 16b1. Station 16a2 dissection may be associated with a traction injury of the left renal vein or damage of right renal or suprarenal arteries and is dissected if there are specific concerns regarding involvement. CONCLUSIONS While station 16 provides important prognostic information for risk stratification, a strategic and stepwise approach is needed for a safe sampling. This is accomplished by wide mobilization of the duodenum, implementation of thermal fusion to minimize chyle leak, and careful dissection below the left renal vein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Omid Salehi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard Freeman
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salirrosas O, Vega EA, Panettieri E, Harandi H, Kozyreva O, Ghanta S, Conrad C. ASO Author Reflections: Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas: Getting the Dosing of Surgery Right. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15252-6. [PMID: 38625600 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15252-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Brighton, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Brighton, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Brighton, Boston, MA, USA
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Hamed Harandi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Brighton, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shree Ghanta
- Department of Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Brighton, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salirrosas O, Vega EA, Panettieri E, Harandi H, Kozyreva O, Ghanta S, Conrad C. ASO Visual Abstract: Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas-Is Enucleation Safe? Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15259-z. [PMID: 38619708 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15259-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Brighton, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Brighton, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Brighton, Boston, MA, USA
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Hamed Harandi
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Brighton, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shree Ghanta
- Department of Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Brighton, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salirrosas O, Vega EA, Panettieri E, Salehi O, Kozyreva O, Harandi H, Ganta S, Conrad C. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2024:S1091-255X(24)00361-5. [PMID: 38570231 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains unclear today whether the poor prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was further worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic and whether this may affect providers and patients, today. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effect of COVID-19 on care delivery and outcomes of patients with PDAC in the United States. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for PDAC, between 2017 and 2020. Changes in the number of diagnoses and treatment patterns were compared annually for the entire cohort. Changes in surgical outcomes and median time from diagnosis to treatment were compared and analyzed. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed. RESULTS Of 127,613 patients with PDAC, PDAC diagnoses from 2017 (30,573) to 2019 (33,465) increased but decreased in 2020 (31,218). The number of patients receiving surgery or radiotherapy was stable between 2017 to 2019 (21.75% ± 0.05% and 13.9% ± 0.3%, respectively) but decreased in 2020 (20.7% and 12.4% respectively). Although patients received chemotherapy with increasing frequently from 2016 (60.7%) to 2019 (63.5%), this trend stopped in 2020 (63%). Of 27,490 patients undergoing surgery, the mean time from diagnosis to surgery increased from 2017 (34 days) to 2019 (56 days), with an increase in delay in 2020 (81 days). Moreover, patients who were tested for COVID-19, had a longer median time from diagnosis to surgery even if tested negative (COVID+, 140 days; COVID-, 112 days; P < .001). CONCLUSION Although the oncologic quality of PDAC surgery remained the same during the pandemic, not only did the pandemic lead to an underdiagnosis of PDAC and care delays, but even the suspicion of COVID-19 in patients with a negative test adversely affected their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Omid Salehi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Hamed Harandi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Shree Ganta
- Department of Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mellado S, Chirban AM, Shapera E, Rivera B, Panettieri E, Vivanco M, Conrad C, Sucandy I, Vega EA. Innovations in surgery for gallbladder cancer: A review of robotic surgery as a feasible and safe option. Am J Surg 2024:S0002-9610(24)00112-0. [PMID: 38443272 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgical techniques in the treatment of gallbladder cancer, comparing it with traditional open and laparoscopic methods. METHODS A systematic review of the literature searched for comparative analyses of patient outcomes following robotic, open, and laparoscopic surgeries, focusing on oncological results and perioperative benefits. RESULTS Five total studies published between 2019 and 2023 were identified. Findings indicate that robotic-assisted surgery for gallbladder cancer is as effective as traditional methods in terms of oncological outcomes, with potential advantages in precision and perioperative recovery. CONCLUSIONS Robotic surgery offers a viable and potentially advantageous alternative for gallbladder cancer treatment, warranting further research to confirm its benefits and establish comprehensive surgical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariana M Chirban
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Emanuel Shapera
- Digestive Health Institute, Advent Health Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Belen Rivera
- Department of Surgery, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcelo Vivanco
- Department of Surgery, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, Advent Health Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Panettieri E, Vega EA, Salirrosas O, Harandi H, Kozyreva O, Mellado S, Conrad C. Does adjuvant treatment improve survival in R1 resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? The risk of overtreatment. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:S1091-255X(24)00019-2. [PMID: 38577811 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is associated with positive margins in up to half of the patients. It remains unclear whether adjuvant therapies contribute to improved survival in patients undergoing R1 resection for pCCA. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with pCCA between 2004 and 2016. Patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis were excluded. RESULTS A total of 1756 patients were included (286 surgical patients and 1470 nonsurgical patients). Patients who underwent R0 resection showed a significantly better median overall survival (OS) than that of patients who underwent R1 resection (41.7 vs 21.4 months, respectively; P = .003). Nevertheless, OS was better in patients who underwent R1 resection than in nonsurgical patients (21.4 vs 6.3 months, respectively; P < .001). Patients undergoing chemoradiation after R1 resection had similar OS to that of those receiving any other adjuvant therapy (21.4 vs 19.4 months, respectively; P = .789) or no adjuvant treatment (21.4 vs 19.8 months, respectively; P = .925). After uni- and multivariable analyses, T stage ≥3 and R1 margins were independently associated with worse survival after surgery. CONCLUSION As currently neither radiation, chemoradiation, nor chemotherapy seem to significantly improve survival in patients who underwent R1 resection for pCCA, high-quality surgical resection remains critically important. Moreover, the concern of overtreatment of patients who underwent R1 resection with current adjuvant therapeutic regimes exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Hamed Harandi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Panettieri E, Vega EA, Salirrosas O, Ogiso S, Geller D, Conrad C. Global practice patterns of preoperative image reconstruction for liver surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:26-32. [PMID: 38353071 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2023.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three-dimensional (3-D) liver modeling is used globally; however, its actual practice is limited to a few centers. This study aimed to assess practice patterns and barriers to the use of 3-D modeling among liver surgeons worldwide. METHODS A survey approved by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association research council consisting of 27 questions was conducted using an online questionnaire. Incomplete responses were excluded. RESULTS Of 235 respondents from 46 countries, 81.3% reported experience with 3-D modeling; however, only 21% used it in > 75% of cases. Surgeons using 3-D reconstruction were older (P = .025), worked more frequently at academic facilities (P = .007), and had more years of experience (P = .001), especially in minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) (P = .038). In addition, 3-D rendering was performed by surgeons in 50.8% of cases. Liver volumetry was the most frequent indication (80.1%), and decreased postoperative complications were the main perceived benefit (53.6%). CONCLUSIONS More experience in liver surgery because of seniority, case volume, and openness to novel technology (MILS) is associated with a greater appreciation for the value of 3-D modeling. Our results suggest the need for senior surgeons to help early-career surgeons consider 3-D modeling for the reported benefit of reduced intra- and postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Satoshi Ogiso
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maki H, Kim BJ, Kawaguchi Y, Fernandez-Placencia R, Haddad A, Panettieri E, Newhook TE, Baumann DP, Santos D, Tran Cao HS, Chun YS, Tzeng CWD, Vauthey JN, Vreeland TJ. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Incisional Hernia After Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2388-2395. [PMID: 37537494 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05777-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incisional hernia (IH) is common after major abdominal surgery; however, the incidence after hepatectomy for cancer has not been described. We analyzed incidence of and risk factors for IH after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS Patients who underwent open hepatectomy with midline or reverse-L incision for CLM at a single institution between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative CT scans were reviewed to identify IH and the time from hepatectomy to hernia. Cumulative IH incidence was calculated using competing risk analysis. Risk factors were assessed using Cox proportional hazards model analysis. The relationship between IH incidence and preoperative body mass index (BMI) was estimated using a generalized additive model. RESULTS Among 470 patients (median follow-up: 16.9 months), IH rates at 12, 24, and 60 months were 41.5%, 51.0%, and 59.2%, respectively. Factors independently associated with IH were surgical site infection (HR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.06, P = 0.003) and BMI > 25 kg/m2 (HR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.45-2.61, P < 0.001). IH incidence was similar in patients undergoing midline and reverse-L incisions and patients who received and did not receive a bevacizumab-containing regimen. The 1-year IH rate increased with increasing number of risk factors (zero: 22.2%; one: 46.8%; two: 60.3%; P < 0.001). Estimated IH incidence was 10% for BMI of 15 kg/m2 and 80% for BMI of 40 kg/m2. CONCLUSION IH is common after open hepatectomy for CLM, particularly in obese patients and patients with surgical site infection. Surgeons should consider risk-mitigation strategies, including alternative fascial closure techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bradford J Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ramiro Fernandez-Placencia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Donald P Baumann
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Santos
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Timothy J Vreeland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vega EA, Salehi O, Panettieri E, Salirrosas O, Brauner E, Mellado S, Dvir K, Perepletchikov A, Kozyreva O, Conrad C. Subsegmental approaches to S7: anatomic laparoscopic transdiaphragmatic and nonanatomic robotic transthoracic. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8154-8155. [PMID: 37644157 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10310-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive liver surgery of postero-superior segments (S4a, S7, S8) remains a challenge. The caudal view, an increased distance between trocars and the operative field, and the liver fulcrum limiting the view, contribute to the difficulty [1, 2]. We and other groups have previously reported the use of intercostal trocars to access subdiaphragmatic tumors (transdiaphragmatic approach) [3-5], only few reports on a laparoscopic total transthoracic approach, none (to our knowledge) dynamic manuscripts of a total transthoracic robotic approach, and none (to our knowledge) that use preoperative port site and anatomic modelling exist. Further, we developed a total transthoracic (thoracoscopic) approach to avoid a hostile abdomen, while bringing viewing axis and instruments close to the target [6-10]. In this context, this report details the advantages of a laparoscopic vs. robotic transthoracic approach. According to institutional protocol, reports of individual cases in print or video format do not require institutional review board approval. PATIENT A 68-year-old male on peritoneal dialysis with left colon adenocarcinoma and a single synchronous liver metastasis in S6-7 close to the root of the right hepatic vein underwent a laparoscopic transdiaphragmatic metastasectomy. Two years later, the patient developed a recurrent 1.5 cm liver metastasis in S7, which lend itself to a robotic transthoracic approach. TECHNIQUE Following 3-D modelling and virtual port placement planning, the first metastasectomy was performed laparoscopically using a transdiaphragmatic approach. The recurrence was managed transthoracically due to more apical, subdiaphragmatic location. For this operation, a robotic approach was optimal as robotic wrist articulation facilitates manipulation via the limited intercostal space. This was particularly helpful during the diaphragmatic reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS Total transthoracic liver surgery is certainly an advanced procedure requiring superior MIS liver skills. Recommendations for starting with a total transthoracic approach are not unlike from starting a standard, none-transthoracic liver surgery. Early on in the experience we recommend advanced liver MIS skills, and single, small, subdiaphragmatic tumors away from major vessels. Nonetheless, when these recommendations are followed a total transthoracic approach may be safer and result in less access trauma, than traversing a hostile abdomen to reach the posterior-superior liver. Both laparoscopic and robotic transthoracic approaches can facilitate the resection of subdiaphragmatic tumors, especially in patients with hostile abdomens. While the laparoscopic approach has advantages due to a broader spectrum of available surgical tools (flexible tip camera, parenchymal dissection, and energy devices), the robotic wrist articulation facilitates manipulation via the restricted intercostal space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Omid Salehi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eran Brauner
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kathrin Dvir
- Department of Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aleksandr Perepletchikov
- Department of Pathology, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Department of Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mellado S, Chirban AM, Rivera B, Panettieri E, Vega EA. ASO Author Reflections: Precision in Gallbladder Cancer Care: Present Challenges and Future Directions. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6601-6602. [PMID: 37548834 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14062-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariana M Chirban
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Belen Rivera
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vega EA, Mellado S, Chirban AM, Panettieri E, Sanhueza M, Mege R, Diaz C, Brañes A, Briceño E, Viñuela E. Analysis of the Extent of Liver Oncological Extended Resection for Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: How Much Is Too Much? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6594-6600. [PMID: 37460736 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13861-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection is pivotal in treating incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC). However, the adequate volume of liver resection remains controversial. METHODS A cross-sectional retrospective analysis was performed on resected IGBC patients between 1999 and 2018. Morbidity was evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The theoretical volume of a 2-cm and 1.5-cm wedge liver resection was calculated (105 cm3 and 77.5 cm3, respectively) and used as reference. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Among 111 patients re-resected for IGBC, 84 provided sufficient data to calculate liver resection volume. Patients with a resection volume ≥ 105 cm3 had a higher rate of overall morbidity (P = 0.001) and length of stay (P = 0.012), with no difference in mortality. There was no significant difference in OS according to residual cancer or T-category. A resection volume ≥ 77.5 cm3 was more frequent in T ≥ 3 than in T1-2 patients (P = 0.026), and residual cancer was higher (P = 0.041) among patients with ≥ 77.5 cm3 resected. Cox multivariate regression showed that residual cancer (HR = 11.47, P < 0.001), perineural/lymphovascular invasion (HR = 2.48, P = 0.021), and Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa morbidity (HR = 5.03, P = 0.003) predict worse OS, but not liver volume resection. CONCLUSION There are no significant differences in OS based on resected liver volume of IGBC, when R0 is achieved. There is a significant difference in morbidity and length of stay when liver wedges are ≥ 105 cm3, which is lost when analyzed by Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa. A 77.5-105 cm3 resection is indicated in ≥ T3 patients, minimizing morbidity risk, while addressing concerns of overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Hepato-Pancreato-BiliarySurgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Faculty of Medicine, Sotero del Rio Hospital, Pontificia Universidad Catolica of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| | - Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Hepato-Pancreato-BiliarySurgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariana M Chirban
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Hepato-Pancreato-BiliarySurgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Hepato-Pancreato-BiliarySurgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcel Sanhueza
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Faculty of Medicine, Sotero del Rio Hospital, Pontificia Universidad Catolica of Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Rosemarie Mege
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Faculty of Medicine, Sotero del Rio Hospital, Pontificia Universidad Catolica of Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Cristian Diaz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Faculty of Medicine, Sotero del Rio Hospital, Pontificia Universidad Catolica of Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alejandro Brañes
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Faculty of Medicine, Sotero del Rio Hospital, Pontificia Universidad Catolica of Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Eduardo Briceño
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Eduardo Viñuela
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Faculty of Medicine, Sotero del Rio Hospital, Pontificia Universidad Catolica of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Giuliante F, Panettieri E, De Rose AM, Murazio M, Vellone M, Mele C, Clemente G, Giovannini I, Nuzzo G, Ardito F. Bile duct injury after cholecystectomy: timing of surgical repair should be based on clinical presentation. The experience of a tertiary referral center with Hepp-Couinaud hepatico-jejunostomy. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1509-1517. [PMID: 37580549 PMCID: PMC10435431 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01611-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
Impact of timing of repair on outcomes of patients repaired with Hepp-Couinaud hepatico-jejunostomy (HC-HJ) after bile duct injury (BDI) during cholecystectomy remains debated. This is an observational retrospective study at a tertiary referral hepato-biliary center. HC-HJ was always performed in patients without sepsis or bile leak and with dilated bile ducts. Timing of repair was classified as: early (≤ 2 weeks), intermediate (> 2 weeks, ≤ 6 weeks), and delayed (> 6 weeks). 114 patients underwent HC-HJ between 1994 and 2022: 42.1% underwent previous attempts of repair at referring institutions (Group A) and 57.9% were referred without any attempt of repair before referral (Group B). Overall, a delayed HC-HJ was performed in 78% of patients; intermediate and early repair were performed in 17% and 6%, respectively. In Group B, 10.6% of patients underwent an early, 27.3% an intermediate, and 62.1% a delayed repair. Postoperative mortality was nil. Median follow-up was 106.7 months. Overall primary patency (PP) attainment rate was 94.7%, with a 5- and 10-year actuarial primary patency (APP) of 84.6% and 84%, respectively. Post-repair bile leak was associated with PP loss in the entire population (odds ratio [OR] 9.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-57.87, p = 0.012); no correlation of PP loss with timing of repair was noted. Treatment of anastomotic stricture (occurred in 15.3% of patients) was performed with percutaneous treatment, achieving absence of biliary symptoms in 93% and 91% of cases at 5 and 10 years, respectively. BDI can be successfully repaired by HC-HJ regardless of timing when surgery is performed in stable patients with dilated bile ducts and without bile leak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Agostino M De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Marino Murazio
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Vellone
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Mele
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Clemente
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Ivo Giovannini
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nuzzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vega EA, Newhook TE, Mellado S, Ruzzenente A, Okuno M, De Bellis M, Panettieri E, Ahmad MU, Merlo I, Rojas J, De Rose AM, Nishino H, Sinnamon AJ, Donadon M, Hauger MS, Guevara OA, Munoz C, Denbo JW, Chun YS, Tran Cao HS, Sanchez Claria R, Tzeng CWD, De Aretxabala X, Vivanco M, Brudvik KW, Seo S, Pekolj J, Poultsides GA, Torzilli G, Giuliante F, Anaya DA, Guglielmi A, Vinuela E, Vauthey JN. Benchmarks and Geographic Differences in Gallbladder Cancer Surgery: An International Multicenter Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4904-4911. [PMID: 37149547 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13531-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-quality surgery plays a central role in the delivery of excellent oncologic care. Benchmark values indicate the best achievable results. We aimed to define benchmark values for gallbladder cancer (GBC) surgery across an international population. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study included consecutive patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent surgery during 2000-2021 at 13 centers, across seven countries and four continents. Patients operated on at high-volume centers without the need for vascular and/or bile duct reconstruction and without significant comorbidities were chosen as the benchmark group. RESULTS Of 906 patients who underwent curative-intent GBC surgery during the study period, 245 (27%) were included in the benchmark group. These were predominantly women (n = 174, 71%) and had a median age of 64 years (interquartile range 57-70 years). In the benchmark group, 50 patients (20%) experienced complications within 90 days after surgery, with 20 patients (8%) developing major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa). Median length of postoperative hospital stay was 6 days (interquartile range 4-8 days). Benchmark values included ≥ 4 lymph nodes retrieved, estimated intraoperative blood loss ≤ 350 mL, perioperative blood transfusion rate ≤ 13%, operative time ≤ 332 min, length of hospital stay ≤ 8 days, R1 margin rate ≤ 7%, complication rate ≤ 22%, and rate of grade ≥ IIIa complications ≤ 11%. CONCLUSIONS Surgery for GBC remains associated with significant morbidity. The availability of benchmark values may facilitate comparisons in future analyses among GBC patients, GBC surgical approaches, and centers performing GBC surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Tuft University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Masayuki Okuno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - M Usman Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ignacio Merlo
- General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jesus Rojas
- UGI & HPB Surgery Unit, Hospital Regional de Talca, Universidad Catolica del Maule, Talca, Chile
| | - Agostino M De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Hiroto Nishino
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Andrew J Sinnamon
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marit S Hauger
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Oscar A Guevara
- Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Cesar Munoz
- UGI & HPB Surgery Unit, Hospital Regional de Talca, Universidad Catolica del Maule, Talca, Chile
| | - Jason W Denbo
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rodrigo Sanchez Claria
- General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xabier De Aretxabala
- Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Marcelo Vivanco
- Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Kristoffer W Brudvik
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Juan Pekolj
- General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniel A Anaya
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Eduardo Vinuela
- Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vega EA, Mellado S, Panettieri E, Newhook T, Vauthey JN. ASO Author Reflections: Harnessing the Power of Data- The Impact of Benchmarking in Healthcare. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4912-4913. [PMID: 37202572 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13647-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Timothy Newhook
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jean Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Panettieri E, Vega EA, Chirban AM, Salirrosas O, Clancy TE, Malek A, Freeman R, Conrad C. Anatomic Laparoscopic Partial Hepatectomy of a Segment 4a B-Catenin Mutated Adenoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4234-4235. [PMID: 36752966 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13106-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although a β-catenin mutated hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is a benign liver tumor, it can cause bleeding, obstruction, pain, and hepatocellular carcinoma.1-3 Because surgery needs to balance these risks with its morbidity, a minimally invasive approach may be well suited.4-6 In this report, a strategic approach to minimally invasive resection of HCA encompassing segment 4a (S4a) is reviewed. PATIENT A 22-year-old woman with abdominal pain was found to have two liver lesions involving segment 4a (5 cm) and segment 8 (S8) (4.5 cm). Liver biopsy confirmed a β-catenin mutated HCA in the S4a lesion. After embolization, an anatomic S4a segmentectomy and a partial S8 resection were planned. TECHNIQUE Three-dimensional modeling was used to perform a preoperative virtual hepatectomy; to visualize the spatial relationship between the HCA, the portal bifurcation, and the hepatic veins; and to preplan the port sites.7 With the patient in the French position, after port placement, intraoperative ultrasound was performed to identify the transection plane.8 The main left portal pedicle and Rex's recessus were exposed, and the branches of S4a were dissected out, clipped, and divided. Using ultrasound, the middle hepatic vein was exposed to define the lateral border of the dissection plane. CONCLUSION Although a β-catenin mutated HCA in S4a does not necessitate a formal segmentectomy, understanding the anatomic structures outlining its borders can facilitate the resection, especially for a large HCA. Virtual hepatectomy helps to achieve a detailed comprehension of the complex borders of segment 4a. Preoperative embolization can firm up the tumor and minimize the risk of intraoperative rupture from manipulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariana M Chirban
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas E Clancy
- Dana-Farber Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anita Malek
- Department of Pathology, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard Freeman
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
- General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Panettieri E, Vega EA, Conrad C. ASO Author Reflections: On the Road to Autonomous Liver Surgery? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4236-4237. [PMID: 36847959 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13218-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chirban AM, Vega EA, Kutlu OC, Mellado S, Kozyreva O, Zauls AJ, Panettieri E, Salirrosas O, Freeman R, Conrad C. R1 pancreatic cancer patients benefit from chemoradiation when initiation of adjuvant therapy is delayed. Surg Oncol 2023; 49:101961. [PMID: 37321066 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreas cancer (PDAC) has been demonstrated to improve survival. However, the optimal adjuvant treatment (AT) regimen for R1-margin patients remains unclear. This retrospective study investigates the impact of AC vs. adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) on survival (OS). MATERIAL AND METHODS The NCDB was queried for patients with PDAC who underwent PD between 2010 and 2018. Patients were divided into, (A) AC<60 days, (B) ACRT<60 days, (C) AC≥60 days, and (D) ACRT≥60 days. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Among 13 740 patients, median OS was 23.7 months. For R1 patients, median OS for timely AC and ACRT, and delayed AC and ACRT was 19.91, 19.19, 15.24, 18.96 months, respectively. While time of AC initiation was an insignificant factor for R0 patients (p = 0.263, CI 0.957-1.173), a survival benefit was found for R1 patients who received AC<60 vs. ≥60 days (p = 0.041, CI 1.002-1.42). Among R1 patients, administration of delayed ACRT achieves the same survival benefit of timely AC initiation (p = 0.074, CI 0.703-1.077). CONCLUSION The study suggests value in ACRT for patients with R1 margins when delay of AT≥60 days cannot be avoided. Hence, ACRT may mitigate the negative impact of delayed AT initiation for R1-patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariana M Chirban
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA; Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA
| | - Onur C Kutlu
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St f4, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Sebastian Mellado
- Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Medicine, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Andris J Zauls
- Good Samaritan Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, 818 Oak Street, Brockton, MA, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA; Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via della Pineta Sacchetti, 217, 00168, Roma RM, Italy
| | - Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA
| | - Richard Freeman
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Coppola A, Farolfi T, La Vaccara V, Iannone I, Giovinazzo F, Panettieri E, Tarallo M, Cammarata R, Coppola R, Caputo D. Neoadjuvant Treatments for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Where We Are and Where We Are Going. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12113677. [PMID: 37297872 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents a challenging disease for the surgeon, oncologist, and radiation oncologist in both diagnostic and therapeutic settings. Surgery is currently the gold standard treatment, but the role of neoadjuvant treatment (NAD) is constantly evolving and gaining importance in resectable PDACs. The aim of this narrative review is to report the state of the art and future perspectives of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with PDAC. METHODS A PubMed database search of articles published up to September 2022 was carried out. RESULTS Many studies showed that FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel in a neoadjuvant setting had a relevant impact on overall survival (OS) for patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable PDAC without increasing post-operative complications. To date, there have not been many published multicentre randomised trials comparing upfront surgery with NAD in resectable PDAC patients, but the results obtained are promising. NAD in resectable PDAC showed long-term effective benefits in terms of median OS (5-year OS rate 20.5% in NAD group vs. 6.5% in upfront surgery). NAD could play a role in the treatment of micro-metastatic disease and lymph nodal involvement. In this scenario, given the low sensitivity and specificity for lymph-node metastases of radiological investigations, CA 19-9 could be an additional tool in the decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS The future challenge could be to identify only selected patients who will really benefit from upfront surgery despite a combination of NAD and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Coppola
- Department of Surgey, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Farolfi
- General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
- General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Immacolata Iannone
- Department of Surgey, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Giovinazzo
- General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Mariarita Tarallo
- Department of Surgey, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Cammarata
- General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Coppola
- General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
- General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Damiano Caputo
- General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy
- General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ardito F, Lai Q, Savelli A, Grassi S, Panettieri E, Clemente G, Nuzzo G, Oliva A, Giuliante F. Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy: delayed referral to a tertiary care center is strongly associated with malpractice litigation. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:374-383. [PMID: 36739266 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bile duct injury (BDI) following cholecystectomy is associated with malpractice litigation. Aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for litigation in patients with BDI referred in a tertiary care center. METHODS Patients treated for BDI between 1994 and 2016. Stabilized inverse probability therapy weighting was used and multivariable logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for malpractice litigation. RESULTS Of the 211 treated patients, 98 met the inclusion criteria: early-referral group (<20 days; 51.0%), late-referral (≥20 days; 49.0%). 36 patients (36.7%) initiated malpractice litigation with verdict in favor of plaintiff in 86.7% of cases (median payment = €90 500, up to €600 000). Attempts at surgical and endoscopic repair before referral were significantly higher in late-referral group. Failed postoperative management (delayed referral, attempts at repair before referral) was one of the strongest predictors for litigation. Risk of litigation progressively increased from 23.8%, when referral time was within 19 days, to 54.5% (61-120 days), to 60.0% (121-210 days) and to 65.1% (211-365 days). DISCUSSION Litigation rate after BDI was 37%. Delayed referral to tertiary care center was one of the strongest predictors for litigation. Prompt referral to tertiary experienced centers without any attempt at repair may reduce the risk of litigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Alida Savelli
- Department of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Grassi
- Department of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Clemente
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nuzzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Oliva
- Department of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Giuliante F, Ratti F, Panettieri E, Mazzaferro V, Guglielmi A, Ettorre GM, Gruttadauria S, Di Benedetto F, Cillo U, De Carlis L, Dalla Valle R, Ferrero A, Santambrogio R, Ardito F, Aldrighetti L. Short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive liver resection for single small hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of 714 patients from the IGoMILS (Italian group of minimally invasive liver surgery) registry. HPB (Oxford) 2023:S1365-182X(23)00046-1. [PMID: 36922259 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Widespread use of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) contributed to the reduction of surgical risk of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of MILS for single ≤3 cm HCC. METHODS Patients who underwent MILS for single ≤3 cm HCC (November 2014 - December 2019) were identified from the Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (IGoMILS) Registry. RESULTS Of 714 patients included, 641 (93.0%) were Child-Pugh A; 65.7% were limited resections and 2.2% major resections, with a conversion rate of 5.2%. Ninety-day mortality rate was 0.3%. Overall morbidity rate was 22.4% (3.8% major complications). Mean postoperative stay was 5 days. Robotic resection showed longer operative time (p = 0.004) and a higher overall morbidity rate (p < 0.001), with similar major complications (p = 0.431). Child-Pugh B patients showed worse mortality (p = 0.017) and overall morbidity (p = 0.021), and longer postoperative stay (p = 0.005). Five-year overall survival was 79.5%; cirrhosis, satellite micronodules, and microvascular invasion were independently associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS MILS for ≤3 cm HCC was associated with low morbidity and mortality rates, showing high safety, and supporting the increasing indications for surgical resection in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB, General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, University Hospital G.B. Rossi, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe M Ettorre
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, Palermo, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Transplant, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Santambrogio
- ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Chirurgia Generale Ospedale Fatebenefratelli, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Panettieri E, Maki H, Kim BJ, Kang HC, Cox V, Vega EA, Mizuno T, Pant S, Javle M, Vauthey JN, Kawaguchi Y. Arterial enhancement pattern predicts survival in patients with resectable and unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Oncol 2022; 40:101696. [PMID: 34995974 PMCID: PMC8863406 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients undergoing resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), hypervascularity during the arterial phase of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is associated with better prognosis than hypovascularity. However, the prognostic implications of arterial enhancement pattern in patients with unresectable ICC are unknown. We assessed the prognostic implications of arterial enhancement pattern in patients with resectable and unresectable ICC. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent surgery or gemcitabine-plus-cisplatin chemotherapy for ICC during 2003-2015 and CT with dynamic enhancement for diagnosis were included. After review by 2 radiologists, tumors were categorized according to the percentage of the tumor exhibiting arterial enhancement as hypervascular (>50% of tumor exhibiting enhancement), peripherally enhancing (10%-50%), and hypovascular (<10%). In each cohort (surgical and medical), overall survival (OS) curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between curves were evaluated with Cox analysis. RESULTS The study included 56 patients treated surgically and 89 patients with unresectable ICC. Mean (standard deviation) tumor density in the hypervascular, peripherally enhancing, and hypovascular groups was 119.3 (45.2) Hounsfield units (HU), 72.1 (15.9) HU, and 59.9 (14.4) HU, respectively, in the surgical cohort and 93.6 (17.5) HU, 66.6 (16.2) HU, and 48.7 (14.3) HU, respectively, in the medical cohort. In both cohorts, the 5-year OS rate was significantly higher in the hypervascular group than in the hypovascular group (surgical, 67.6% vs 22.5%, P = .038; medical, 15.4% vs 0%, P = .030). In both cohorts, a Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that hypervascularity was significantly associated with better OS. CONCLUSION Hypervascularity during the arterial CT phase is a prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing ICC resection and patients with unresectable ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bradford J. Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - HyunSeon Christine Kang
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Veronica Cox
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Eduardo A. Vega
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Clemente G, De Rose AM, Panettieri E, Ardito F, Murazio M, Nuzzo G, Giuliante F. Pancreatico-Jejunostomy On Isolated Loop After Pancreatico-Duodenectomy: Is It Worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1205-1212. [PMID: 35296957 PMCID: PMC9184425 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05296-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative morbidity remains a significant problem after pancreatico-duodenectomy. The management of pancreatic stump continues to be a challenge, and many technical solutions have been developed over the years. In this study, we report the results obtained with the use of an isolated loop for pancreatico-jejunostomy in patients with soft pancreas and small pancreatic duct diameter. METHODS Clinical data of patients submitted to pancreatico-duodenectomy in a period of sixteen years (2005-2020) were extracted from a prospective database. Patients with soft pancreas, main duct diameter < 2 mm and reconstruction by pancreatico-jejunostomy on single loop or isolated loop were selected. Primary end-point was the incidence of clinically relevant fistulas in the two groups of patients. Secondary endpoint was the length of postoperative hospital stay. A propensity score matching analysis was used for the statistics. RESULTS Two hundred and twenty-one patients with the above characteristics were found in the database. One hundred and twelve of these received a single-loop reconstruction and 109 an isolated loop reconstruction. Incidence of clinically relevant fistulas was higher in the first group (41% vs 27%; p = 0.023). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the second group (21 days vs 15; p < 0.001). These results were confirmed at the propensity score matching. CONCLUSION In patients with soft pancreatic texture and small main duct diameter, pancreatico-jejunostomy on isolated loop is associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant fistulas than after classic reconstruction. The duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly reduced, with consequent reduction of cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gennaro Clemente
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | - Agostino Maria De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marino Murazio
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nuzzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kawaguchi Y, Kopetz S, Tran Cao HS, Panettieri E, De Bellis M, Nishioka Y, Hwang H, Wang X, Tzeng CWD, Chun YS, Aloia TA, Hasegawa K, Guglielmi A, Giuliante F, Vauthey JN. Contour prognostic model for predicting survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: development and multicentre validation study using largest diameter and number of metastases with RAS mutation status. Br J Surg 2021; 108:968-975. [PMID: 33829254 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most current models for predicting survival after resection of colorectal liver metastasis include largest diameter and number of colorectal liver metastases as dichotomous variables, resulting in underestimation of the extent of risk variation and substantial loss of statistical power. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a new prognostic model for patients undergoing liver resection including largest diameter and number of colorectal liver metastases as continuous variables. METHODS A prognostic model was developed using data from patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases at MD Anderson Cancer Center and had RAS mutational data. A Cox proportional hazards model analysis was used to develop a model based on largest colorectal liver metastasis diameter and number of metastases as continuous variables. The model results were shown using contour plots, and validated externally in an international multi-institutional cohort. RESULTS A total of 810 patients met the inclusion criteria. Largest colorectal liver metastasis diameter (hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.06 to 1.16; P < 0.001), number of colorectal liver metastases (HR 1.06, 1.03 to 1.09; P < 0.001), and RAS mutation status (HR 1.76, 1.42 to 2.18; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with overall survival, together with age, primary lymph node metastasis, and prehepatectomy chemotherapy. The model performed well in the external validation cohort, with predicted overall survival values almost lying within 10 per cent of observed values. Wild-type RAS was associated with better overall survival than RAS mutation even when liver resection was performed for larger and/or multiple colorectal liver metastases. CONCLUSION The contour prognostic model, based on diameter and number of lesions considered as continuous variables along with RAS mutation, predicts overall survival after resection of colorectal liver metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - H S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - E Panettieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation and Teaching Hospital IRCCS A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - M De Bellis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, G. B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Y Nishioka
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - H Hwang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - X Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - C-W D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Y S Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - T A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - K Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - A Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, G. B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - F Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation and Teaching Hospital IRCCS A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - J-N Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vega EA, Newhook TE, Kawaguchi Y, Qiao W, De Bellis M, Okuno M, Panettieri E, Nishino H, Duwe G, Piccino M, De Rose AM, Ruzzenente A, Uemoto S, Vivanco M, Chun YS, Cao HST, Tzeng CWD, De Aretxabala X, Seo S, Giuliante F, Guglielmi A, Vinuela E, Vauthey JN. Conditional Recurrence-Free Survival after Oncologic Extended Resection for Gallbladder Cancer: An International Multicenter Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:2675-2682. [PMID: 33666814 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09626-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data to guide surveillance following oncologic extended resection (OER) for gallbladder cancer (GBC) are lacking. Conditional recurrence-free survival (C-RFS) can inform surveillance. We aimed to estimate C-RFS and identify factors affecting conditional RFS after OER for GBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with ≥ T1b GBC who underwent curative-intent surgery in 2000-2018 at four countries were identified. Risk factors for recurrence and RFS were evaluated at initial resection in all patients and at 12 and 24 months after resection in patients remaining recurrence-free. RESULTS Of the 1071 patients who underwent OER, 484 met the inclusion criteria; 290 (60%) were recurrence-free at 12 months, and 199 (41%) were recurrence-free at 24 months. Median follow-up was 24.5 months for all patients and 47.21 months in survivors at analysis. Five-year RFS rates were 47% for the overall population, 71% for patients recurrence-free at 12 months, and 87% for the patients without recurrence at 24 months. In the entire cohort, the risk of recurrence peaked at 8 months. T3-T4 disease was independently associated with recurrence in all groups: entire cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-3.13, P < 0.001], 12-month recurrence-free (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.88-6.23, P < 0.001), and 24-month recurrence-free (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.11-6.62, P = 0.029). Of the 125 patients without these risk factors, only 2 had recurrence after 36 months. CONCLUSION C-RFS improves over time, and only T3-T4 disease remains a risk factor for recurrence at 24 months after OER for GBC. For all recurrence-free survivors after 36 months, the probability of recurrence is similar regardless of T category or disease stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wei Qiao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Masayuki Okuno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Hiroto Nishino
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Gregor Duwe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marco Piccino
- Department of Surgery, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Agostino M De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Shinji Uemoto
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Marcelo Vivanco
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xabier De Aretxabala
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Eduardo Vinuela
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kawaguchi Y, De Bellis M, Panettieri E, Duwe G, Vauthey JN. Debate: Improvements in Systemic Therapies for Liver Metastases Will Increase the Role of Locoregional Treatments. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:205-218. [PMID: 33220806 PMCID: PMC7709757 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2020.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The benefit of resection of liver metastases depends on primary diseases. Neuroendocrine tumors are associated with favorable prognosis after resection of liver metastases. Gastric cancer has worse tumor biology, and resection of gastric liver metastases should be performed in selected patients. A multidisciplinary approach is well established for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). Resection remains the only curative treatment of CLM. Chemotherapy and molecular-targeted therapy have improved survival in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Understanding of the following two strategies, conversion therapy and two-stage hepatectomy, are important to make this patient group to be candidates for curative-intent surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregor Duwe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zimmitti G, Panettieri E, Ardito F, Mele C, Maria V, Rosso E, Nuzzo G, Giuliante F. Aggressive recurrences determine oncologic outcomes after resection of liver metastases from primary right colon cancer: Results of a case-control study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:834-841. [PMID: 33032866 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recent studies suggest that, among patients operated on for colorectal liver metastases (CLM), the primary tumor location may impact on postoperative survivals, results are still contrasting. OBJECTIVE evaluating survivals (overall (OS) and (DFS)) following liver resection of CLM from Right colon Cancer (RcC-CLM) versus Left colon Cancer (LcC-CLM), among patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy (pCHT), identifying survival predictors, and investigating impact of recurrent disease pattern and management on survival. METHODS Among 727 patients operated for CLM(1989-2016), after excluding patients with primary transverse colon/rectum tumor and patients not receving pCHT, 297 patients were identified. Among them, 81 with RcC-CLM were matched 1:1 with LcC-CLM, according to CLM number and diameter, disease-free interval between primary tumor and CLM diagnosis, primary tumor N-status, and the presence of extrahepatic disease. RESULTS Overall, 66.7% of patients had multiple CLM, 21% had CLM>5 cm, 82.7% had DFI<12 months, 67.9% had N+ primary tumor, and 11.1% had extrahepatic disease at time of hepatectomy. RcC-CLM patients were similar to LcC-CLM in terms of demographic, clinical, perioperative, and pathologic characteristics. Patients operated for RcC-CLM, compared to LcC-CLM, had significantly shorter 5y-DFS(18% versus 39%) and 5y-OS(38% vs 65%). At multivariate analysis, being operated for RcC-CLM, compared to LcC-CLM, was the strongest predictor of recurrence (Hazard Ratio:2.265,p < .001) and death (HR:2.234,p = .001). Among 107 patients experiencing recurrent disease, curative recurrence resection was associated with higher 5y-OS(64% vs 17%; p < .001). However, recurrence resection was less frequently feasible among RcC-CLM(26%) patients, compared to LcC-CLM(44%,p = .05). CONCLUSIONS resection of RcC-CLM, compared to LcC-CLM, is associated with worse survivals, probably related to a different pattern of recurrence precluding recurrence resection among RcC-CLM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati 57, Brescia, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Mele
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy
| | - Vellone Maria
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati 57, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nuzzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Catholic University, L.go A. Gemelli, 8 Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
De Bellis M, Vega EA, Kawaguchi Y, Panettieri E, Velasco JD, Vreeland TJ, You YN, Holmes AA, Mehran RJ, Vauthey JN. Simultaneous Sigmoid Colectomy, Bilobar Liver Resection and Lung Metastasectomy via a Transdiaphragmatic Approach for Stage IV Colonic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:863-864. [PMID: 32813205 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08831-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current evidence supports the curative resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver and lung metastases in selected patients.1,2 This video shows simultaneous left colectomy, bilobar liver resection, and lung metastasectomy via a transdiaphragmatic approach for stage IV colorectal cancer.3 PATIENT: A 57-year-old man with a stage IV colonic adenocarcinoma was considered for simultaneous resection of primary, liver, and lung metastases without thoracic incision. The tumor mutational status was KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF wild-type, and the patient underwent preoperative chemotherapy. TECHNIQUE After performing a midline laparotomy, atypical liver resection of segments 8/4a was performed under the guidance of intraoperative ultrasonography and intermittent Pringle maneuver using the two-surgeon's technique. A small capsular lesion in segment 3 also was intraoperatively detected and resected. Lung metastasectomy of the right lower lobe was performed via a transdiaphragmatic approach using an endoscopic stapler. Sigmoid colectomy with transanal circular-stapled anastomosis was performed. Duration of surgery and blood loss were 358 min and 400 ml, respectively. Histopathological examination showed metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma with negative surgical margins and final stage was T3N2aM1b. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 6 without complication. He was alive and free of disease at 90-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous colon, liver, and lung resection via a transdiaphragmatic approach is a feasible and safe surgical strategy in selected patients with peripheral lung metastases and favorable tumor biology.4 This surgical strategy avoids thoracic incision, multiple operations, and may reduce the healthcare costs and the recovery time to early implement postoperative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jenilette D Velasco
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy J Vreeland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Allen A Holmes
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Reza J Mehran
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Camarda F, Ardito F, Bensi M, Vellone M, Stefano BD, Vivolo R, Mele C, Ribelli M, Panettieri E, Frascarelli A, Calegari M, Basso M, Pozzo C, Giuliante F, Tortora G, Salvatore L. P-103 The role of primary tumor site as a prognostic factor after resection of colorectal liver metastases: A mono-institutional cohort study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
29
|
Bensi M, Ardito F, Di Stefano B, Vellone M, Vivolo R, Mele C, Ribelli M, Panettieri E, Camarda F, Frascarelli A, Calegari MA, Basso M, Pozzo C, Giuliante F, Tortora G, Salvatore L. The role of primary tumor (PT) site as prognostic factor after resection of colorectal (CRC) liver metastases (LM): A mono-institutional cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.4081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4081 Background: Radical resection of LM is the only chance of cure for liver-only mCRC pts. Besides the evaluation of technical resectability, several factors must be taken into account for the evaluation of recurrence risk. Among them we should consider the Fong Risk Score and its modified version, including RAS/BRAF status (Brudvik’s score). Tumor sidedness is an important prognostic factor in CRC. The impact of PT site on the outcome of LM resection is still debated. Hence, we retrospectively analysed mCRC pts, underwent to radical LM resection at our Institution, investigating the impact of PT site on DFS and OS. Methods: Liver-only mCRC pts underwent to radical LM resection were included. The association of PT site with DFS and OS was evaluated. The following variables were collected: gender; age (≥ vs < 75 years ); ECOG PS; CEA baseline level; PT site; RAS and BRAF status; mucinous histology; grading (G1-2 vs G3); RECIST response during preoperative treatment; resected PT; synchronous vs metachronous; number of LM; bilobar vs unilobar LM; LM diameter ≥ 5 cm; R0 vs R1 resection. Univariate and multivariate analyses for DFS and OS were performed. Results: A total of 463 liver-only mCRC pts underwent to radical LM resection were included. Seventy (15%) pts had a right-sided (r-s) tumor and 393 (85%) pts a left-sided (l-s) tumor. R-s CRC pts more often had RAS/BRAF mutations in comparison to l-s tumors (76% vs 37%; p < 0.0001). Median DFS and OS was 13.1 and 41.6 months, respectively, in r-s CRC vs 16.0 (p = 0.65) and 62.2 months (p = 0.033), respectively, in l-s tumors. At the multivariate analysis no significant association with survival parameters was shown for tumor sidedness. At the multivariate analysis, R0 resection was independently associated both with better DFS and OS; RAS/BRAF wt CRC and resected PT were significantly associated with improved OS. Considering all wt CRC pts (N = 237), 14 (6%) pts had r-s tumor and 223 (94%) l-s tumor. No significant association of tumor sidedness with survival was shown (DFS r = 10.0 vs l = 16.0 months, p = 0.62; OS r = 40.3 vs l = 66.2 months, p = 0.12). Conclusions: Our results showed that a significant smaller proportion of r-s CRC underwent to radical LM resection, indirectly confirming its worse prognosis. Among radically resected pts, r-s CRC was associated to a shorter OS (significant) and DFS (not significant) compared to l-s CRC, but it was not confirmed at the multivariate analysis. We can conclude that right PT site should not be considered as a contraindication for radical LM surgery, when feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Bensi
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Chirurgia Epato-biliare, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Brunella Di Stefano
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Vellone
- Chirurgia Epato-biliare, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaella Vivolo
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Mele
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Ribelli
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Chirurgia Epato-biliare, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Floriana Camarda
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Frascarelli
- Chirurgia Epato-biliare, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Alessandra Calegari
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Basso
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmelo Pozzo
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Chirurgia Epato-biliare, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Lisa Salvatore
- Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Giuliante F, Ardito F, Vellone M, Mele C, Panettieri E, Bellobono M, De Rose AM. Laparoscopic Liver Resection of Segment 7 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with an Ultrasound-Guided Trans-Parenchymal Approach to Segmental Pedicle. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:5175-5176. [PMID: 32419039 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08585-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Vellone
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Mele
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuela Bellobono
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Agostino M De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zimmitti G, Panettieri E, Ardito F, Rosso E, Mele C, Nuzzo G, Giuliante F. Type of response to conversion chemotherapy strongly impacts survival after hepatectomy for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90:558-563. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.15632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of General SurgeryIstituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza Brescia Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation ‘Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli’Catholic University Rome Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation ‘Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli’Catholic University Rome Italy
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Department of General SurgeryIstituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza Brescia Italy
| | - Caterina Mele
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation ‘Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli’Catholic University Rome Italy
| | - Gennaro Nuzzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation ‘Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli’Catholic University Rome Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Foundation ‘Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli’Catholic University Rome Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Giuliante F, Panettieri E, Ardito F, De Rose A, Pocino K, Autilio C, Paolillo C, Capoluongo ED. Circulating tumor cell-related transcripts in blood as prognostic biomarkers of early recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases. Int J Biol Markers 2019; 34:269-275. [PMID: 31213130 DOI: 10.1177/1724600819849438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several prognostic factors were proposed to improve early detection of recurrence after liver resection of metastases of colorectal cancer. Circulating tumor cell-related transcripts were evaluated in colorectal cancer patients with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to investigate usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen CAM5, epidermal growth factor receptor, and ERCC1 transcripts in the bloodstream as predictive factors of recurrence in patients who underwent liver resection for metastases of colorectal cancer. METHODS Peripheral blood was collected from 29 patients at the time of the colorectal cancer liver metastasis resection, and from 25 normal controls. Follow-up draws (FUDs) were also performed at 30 days, and 3 and 12 months since surgery. On each sample, carcinoembryonic antigen CAM5, ERCC1, and GAPDH mRNAs were examined by quantitative reverse transcription (qRT). RESULTS Carcinoembryonic antigen transcript levels were linearly correlated to the number of spiked cells (qRT analytical limit = five cells). Among 29 patients (20 M/9 F; mean age 63 years (range 32-79), highly significant levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, if compared to the baseline, were detected in those relapsing after surgery (P <0.05). The main differences were between the 1st- and 12th-month FUDs. Significantly higher levels of carcinoembryonic antigen were also detected in patients who died from disease progression during the follow-up (as evaluated at 30 days and 90 days FUDs). CONCLUSIONS Blood carcinoembryonic antigen-mRNA absolute copy number overtime variation can represent a valid early predictor of relapse after liver resection in colorectal liver metastases patients. Prospective studies, in the context of large clinical trials, will provide further data to also qualify ERCC1 as a predictive biomarker for decisions on therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Agostino De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Krizia Pocino
- Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Genomics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Autilio
- Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Genomics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmela Paolillo
- Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Genomics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ettore Domenico Capoluongo
- Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Genomics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kawaguchi Y, Lillemoe HA, Panettieri E, Chun YS, Tzeng CWD, Aloia TA, Kopetz S, Vauthey JN. Conditional Recurrence-Free Survival after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Persistent Deleterious Association with RAS and TP53 Co-Mutation. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 229:286-294.e1. [PMID: 31054911 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Revised: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conditional recurrence-free survival (RFS) probability, that is, the probability of remaining recurrence-free after a given interval without recurrence, has not been reported after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). We aimed to estimate conditional RFS and identify factors affecting conditional RFS. STUDY DESIGN Patients undergoing initial resection of CLMs during 2000-2016 with mutation data were identified. The RFS and risk factors for recurrence were evaluated at the time of resection for all patients and at 1 year and 2 years after resection for patients who remained recurrence-free. RESULTS Of 2,118 patients, 485 met the inclusion criteria, of which 225 were recurrence-free at 1 year and 109 were recurrence-free at 2 years. The 5-year RFS rates were 17.3%, 36.8%, and 70.7% for all patients and the 1-year and 2-year recurrence-free groups, respectively, when assessed from the time of initial CLM resection. RAS/TP53 co-mutation was the only factor independently associated with increased risk of recurrence for all groups (all patients, hazard ratio 1.47; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.82; p < 0.001; 1-year recurrence-free, hazard ratio 1.69; 95% CI 1.17 to 2.43; p = 0.005; 2-year recurrence-free, hazard ratio 2.41; 95% CI 1.12 to 5.17; p = 0.024). T category, extrahepatic disease, multiple CLMs, largest CLM diameter, and surgical margin status were risk factors for recurrence in all patients and/or the 1-year recurrence-free group, but not the 2-year recurrence-free group. Median RFS was lower for patients with RAS/TP53 co-mutation than for those with RAS/TP53 wild-type in the 1-year (1.5 vs 2.8 years; p = 0.006) and 2-year recurrence-free groups (3.0 vs 5.9 years; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS Conditional RFS is useful for updating prognosis after a given time interval without recurrence after CLM resection. Importantly, RAS/TP53 co-mutation has a persistent deleterious association with recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Heather A Lillemoe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ardito F, Panettieri E, Vellone M, Ferrucci M, Coppola A, Silvestrini N, Arena V, Adducci E, Capelli G, Vecchio FM, Giovannini I, Nuzzo G, Giuliante F. The impact of R1 resection for colorectal liver metastases on local recurrence and overall survival in the era of modern chemotherapy: An analysis of 1,428 resection areas. Surgery 2018; 165:712-720. [PMID: 30482518 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 09/09/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is still unclear whether a positive surgical margin after resection of colorectal liver metastases remains a poor prognostic factor in the era of modern perioperative chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative chemotherapy has an impact on reducing local recurrence after R1 resection, and the impact of local recurrence on overall survival. METHODS Between 2000 and 2014, a total of 421 patients underwent resection for colorectal liver metastases at our unit after preoperative chemotherapy. The overall number of analyzed resection areas was 1,428. RESULTS The local recurrence rate was 12.8%, significantly higher after R1 resection than after R0 (24.5% vs 8.7%; P < .001). These results were also confirmed in patients with response to preoperative chemotherapy (23.1% after R1 vs 11.2% after R0; P < .001). At multivariate analysis, R1 resection was the only independent risk factor for local recurrence (P < .001). At the analysis of the 1,428 resection areas, local recurrence significantly decreased according to the increase of the surgical margin width (from 19.1% in 0 mm margin to 2.4% in ≥10 mm). At multivariable logistic regression analysis for overall survival, the presence of local recurrence showed a significant negative impact on 5-year overall survival (P < .001). CONCLUSION Surgical margin recurrence after modern preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases was still significantly higher after R1 resection than it was after R0 resection. Local recurrence showed a negative prognostic impact on overall survival. R0 resection should be recommended whenever technically achievable, as well as in patients treated by modern preoperative chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Vellone
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Ferrucci
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Coppola
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Silvestrini
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Arena
- Department of Pathology, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrica Adducci
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fabio M Vecchio
- Department of Pathology, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Ivo Giovannini
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nuzzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli," Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ferrucci M, Ardito F, Coppola A, Panettieri E, Vellone M, Giuliante F. Role of R1 liver resections for colorectal metastases in the era of modern chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
36
|
Giuliante F, Panettieri E, Ardito F. The impact of intraoperative ultrasonography on the management of disappearing colorectal liver metastases. Hepat Oncol 2015; 2:325-328. [PMID: 30191012 DOI: 10.2217/hep.15.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8-I-00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8-I-00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8-I-00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Clemente G, Silvestrini N, Panettieri E, De Rose AM. Video of the Month. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Left-Sided Gallbladder and Hepatic Pedicle. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110:1263. [PMID: 26348301 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|