1
|
Susini P, Nisi G, Pierazzi DM, Giardino FR, Pozzi M, Grimaldi L, Cuomo R. Advances on Capsular Contracture-Prevention and Management Strategies: A Narrative Review of the Literature. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e5034. [PMID: 37305202 PMCID: PMC10256414 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Capsular contracture (CC) is the most relevant complication of both aesthetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery. For many years, experimental and clinical trials have attempted to analyze CC risk factors, clinical features, and appropriate management strategies. It is commonly accepted that a multifactorial etiology promotes CC development. However, the heterogeneity in patients, implants and surgical techniques make it difficult to suitably compare or analyze specific factors. As a consequence, discordant data are present in literature, and a true systematic review is often limited in its conclusions. Hence, we decided to present a comprehensive review of current theories on prevention and management strategies, rather than a specific "solution" to this complication. Methods The PubMed database was searched for literature regarding CC prevention and management strategies. Pertinent articles in English, published before December 1, 2022, were compared with selection criteria and eventually included in this review. Results Through the initial search, 97 articles were identified, of which 38 were included in the final study. Several articles explored different medical and surgical preventive and therapeutic strategies, showing numerous controversies on appropriate CC management. Conclusions This review provides a clear overview of the complexity of CC. The wide variety of clinical situations in term of patients, implants, and surgical techniques prevent the standardization of CC management strategies. By contrast, a patient-customized approach should be preferred, and different strategies should be considered depending on the specific case. Further research is desirable to better ascertain evidence-based protocols with regard to CC prevention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Susini
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Nisi
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Diletta Maria Pierazzi
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Francesco Ruben Giardino
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Mirco Pozzi
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Luca Grimaldi
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Roberto Cuomo
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee JH, Jang JH, Min KH. A Comparison of Smooth and Microtextured Breast Implants in Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Study. Arch Plast Surg 2023; 50:160-165. [PMID: 36999152 PMCID: PMC10049833 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
The number of cosmetic and reconstructive surgeries that use breast implants is increasing in Korea. Recently, it has been reported that breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is related to textured breast implants, and interest in classification according to the texture of breast implants is increasing. However, there is currently no clear and unified classification. In particular, the definition of “microtextured” is highly varied. In this study, we retrospectively investigated and analyzed the clinical outcomes of smooth and microtextured breast implants.
Methods
A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent breast augmentation surgery with smooth and microtextured silicone gel implants between January 2016 and July 2020 was performed. We retrospectively analyzed implant manufacturer, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, incision location, implant size, follow-up period, complications, and reoperation rate.
Results
A total of 266 patients underwent breast augmentation surgery, of which 181 used smooth silicone gel implants and 85 used microtextured silicone gel implants. Age, BMI, smoking status, implant size, and follow-up period were not significantly different between the two groups. Similarly, complications and reoperation rates were not significantly different between the two groups.
Conclusion
It is important to provide information regarding the clinical risks and benefits of breast implants to surgeons and patients through a clear and unified classification according to the texture of the breast implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joo Hyuck Lee
- KIES-U Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hyuk Jang
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, School of Medicine, Eulji University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hee Min
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, School of Medicine, Eulji University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Address for correspondence Kyung Hee Min, MD, PhD Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryNowon Eulji Medical Center, School of Medicine, Eulji University, 68, Hangeulbiseok-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01830Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gallo L, Chu JJ, Shamsunder MG, Hatchell A, Patel A, Godwin K, Hernandez M, Pusic AL, Nelson JA, Voineskos SH. Best Practices for BREAST-Q Research: A Systematic Review of Study Methodology. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:526e-535e. [PMID: 35749737 PMCID: PMC9805659 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data heterogeneity and methodologic errors hinder the ability to draw clinically meaningful conclusions from studies using the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module patient-reported outcome measure. In this systematic review, the authors evaluate the quality of BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module administration in relation to the BREAST-Q version 2.0 user's guide and the reporting of key methodology characteristics. The authors also describe a framework for improving the quality of BREAST-Q data analysis and reporting. METHODS The authors conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Ovid HAPI databases to identify articles on the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module to assess postmastectomy breast reconstruction outcomes. The authors registered the protocol before study implementation on Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/c5236 ) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data on mode of BREAST-Q administration, time horizon justification, and sample size calculation were collected. RESULTS The authors included 185 studies in the analysis. Errors in BREAST-Q administration were identified in 36 studies (19.5 percent). Appropriate administration of the BREAST-Q could not be determined in 63 studies (34.1 percent) because of insufficient reporting. Time horizon for the primary outcome was reported in 71 studies (38.4 percent), with only 17 (9.2 percent) reporting a sample size calculation. CONCLUSIONS The authors identified important yet actionable shortcomings in the BREAST-Q literature. Researchers are encouraged to review the BREAST-Q user's guide in the study design phase to mitigate errors in patient-reported outcome measure administration and reporting for future trials using the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module. Adhering to these guidelines will allow for greater clinical utility and generalizability of BREAST-Q research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Gallo
- Division of Plastic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jacqueline J. Chu
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meghana G. Shamsunder
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Aadit Patel
- Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Kendra Godwin
- Medical Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marisol Hernandez
- Medical Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea L. Pusic
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonas A. Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sophocles H. Voineskos
- Division of Plastic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
VANNI G, DAURI M. Increasing the application of regional anesthesia in breast cancer surgery: lesson from the nationwide French survey. Minerva Anestesiol 2022; 88:647-649. [DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.22.16713-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
5
|
Yaacobi DS, Shachar T, Olshinka A, Lvovsky A, Amir A, Ad-El D, Grush AE, Meshulam-Derazon S. Evolving Trends in Breast-Implant-Based Procedures in Israel: A National Survey. Semin Plast Surg 2022; 36:89-93. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1747965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
AbstractRare reports linking textured breast implants to anaplastic large-cell lymphoma have generated controversies regarding their relative advantage over smooth implants. To evaluate trends in implant use in Israel, we sent a seven-item questionnaire to all active board-certified breast plastic surgeons in the country. About half responded. Approximately 60% of responders reported a moderate-to-considerable decrease in both the relative number of augmentation mammoplasty procedures and the use of implants during mastopexies in the last year. Nearly 40% had switched from textured to smooth implants to some extent. More than 40% still used textured implants for aesthetic procedures, and reconstructive procedures. Surgeons with more experience demonstrated a greater preference for smooth implants. The uncertainty regarding the safety of textured breast implants has led to a partial transition to the use of smoother implants and, importantly, to a general reduction in all breast-implant-based procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dafna Shilo Yaacobi
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva; affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tal Shachar
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Asaf Olshinka
- Plastic Surgery & Burns Unit, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Avraham Amir
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva; affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dean Ad-El
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva; affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Andrew E. Grush
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Sagit Meshulam-Derazon
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center – Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva; affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Suppression of the fibrotic encapsulation of silicone implants by inhibiting the mechanical activation of pro-fibrotic TGF-β. Nat Biomed Eng 2021; 5:1437-1456. [PMID: 34031559 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00722-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The fibrotic encapsulation of implants involves the mechanical activation of myofibroblasts and of pro-fibrotic transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1). Here, we show that both softening of the implant surfaces and inhibition of the activation of TGF-β1 reduce the fibrotic encapsulation of subcutaneous silicone implants in mice. Conventionally stiff silicones (elastic modulus, ~2 MPa) coated with a soft silicone layer (elastic modulus, ~2 kPa) reduced collagen deposition as well as myofibroblast activation without affecting the numbers of macrophages and their polarization states. Instead, fibroblasts around stiff implants exhibited enhanced intracellular stress, increased the recruitment of αv and β1 integrins, and activated TGF-β1 signalling. In vitro, the recruitment of αv integrin to focal adhesions and the activation of β1 integrin and of TGF-β were higher in myofibroblasts grown on latency-associated peptide (LAP)-coated stiff silicones than on soft silicones. Antagonizing αv integrin binding to LAP through the small-molecule inhibitor CWHM-12 suppressed active TGF-β signalling, myofibroblast activation and the fibrotic encapsulation of stiff subcutaneous implants in mice.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ha HJ, Jeong SH, Yang JY, Kim CW, Hwang E. Prevention of Breast Implant Displacement Using the Acellular Dermal Matrix Garter Belt. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 46:1042-1049. [PMID: 34845513 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02665-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the issue of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, smooth breast implants tend to be the more preferred option in implant-based breast reconstructions, compared to its use previously. The most unfavorable aspect of smooth implants is lateral and inferior displacements, which are more common in patients who undergo breast reconstruction compared to augmentation mammoplasty. Hence, we introduce a prevention method for implant displacement using an acellular dermal matrix garter belt. METHODS This study is a retrospective review of patients who had undergone implant-based breast reconstruction between April 2019 and December 2020. Some patients who have highly possibility of implant displacement, had undergone the application of an ADM garter belt to prevent lateral or superior displacement. Implant displacement was assessed before and at least 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 155 IBR cases were recorded. ADM garter belts were applied in 27 patients (17.4%) who had a high tendency of implant displacement for several reasons, which could be classified into two categories: wide breast pocket (56%) and tight inferomedial breast pocket (44%). The intraoperative average distance of lateral slipping on patients' reconstructed breasts from the chest wall midline in supine position was 3.02 ± 0.81 cm and corrected to1.54 ± 0.69 cm at least 6 months postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS We utilized an ADM strap as an internalized garter belt to minimize implant displacement. This ADM garter belt combined with capsuloplasty might be an effective way to prevent the displacement of smooth implants in the patients with a greater risk of implant displacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Collapse
|
8
|
Smooth versus Textured Implant Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148:959-967. [PMID: 34705770 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between textured surface breast implants and breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma has led to an increase in surgical procedures to exchange textured devices to smooth surface implants. Because patient satisfaction is an integral part of breast reconstruction, the purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes between smooth and textured implant recipients. METHODS Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent implant-based postmastectomy breast reconstruction with either smooth or textured devices from 2009 to 2017 and completed the BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure following reconstruction were included in this analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were mean and median BREAST-Q scores and postoperative complications. RESULTS Overall, 1077 patients were included-785 who underwent breast reconstruction with smooth implants and 292 who underwent breast reconstruction with textured implants. No statistical differences were observed between the textured and smooth implant groups for any of the BREAST-Q domain scores at any of the early (3-month) to late (2-year) postoperative time points. Smooth implant recipients reported significantly more rippling (p = 0.003) than textured implant recipients. In contrast, textured implant recipients had a higher rate of cellulitis than smooth implant recipients (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that postoperative satisfaction with breasts or health-related quality of life following immediate postmastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction is likely independent of implant surface type. However, smooth breast implants may result in more rippling. The authors' findings represent an important aid in counseling patients who have questions about the risks and benefits of replacing their textured implants with smooth surface devices. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bellaire CP, Sayegh F, Janssen P, Rutland JW, Salzberg CA. Major Complications After Textured Versus Non-textured Breast Implants in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45:2077-2085. [PMID: 34100107 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02377-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the risks and benefits of smooth versus textured implants for breast reconstruction and primary breast augmentation are thoroughly supported in the literature, few studies have examined the relationship between implant shell texture and complications following direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction. OBJECTIVES The present study examines the relationship between implant shell texture and complications in patients receiving DTI breast reconstruction. METHODS Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing DTI breast reconstruction between 2011 and 2018 by a single surgeon was performed. A propensity score matching algorithm was used to eliminate unwanted bias stemming from clinical covariates. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to examine the association between implant shell texture and the following major postoperative complications: capsular contracture, hematoma, seroma, necrosis, infection, and implant loss. RESULTS A total of 402 unique patients (751 breasts) were included. The majority received smooth implants compared with textured implants (80.3% vs. 19.7%, respectively); 444 breasts were included for comparative analysis after 2:1 propensity score matching (296 smooth implants, 148 textured implants). The only statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two groups was a higher incidence of hematoma in the textured group (2.0% vs 0.0%), Fisher's Exact Test p = 0.04. Additionally, the matched cohort revealed a very low overall rate of capsular contracture (1.0%) for smooth implants. CONCLUSIONS Our data demonstrated non-significant differences for most major complication rates or revision surgery rates for smooth versus textured implants after matching. DTI breast reconstruction with smooth implants remains a safe and effective reconstructive option for select patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Bellaire
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Farah Sayegh
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Pierce Janssen
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - John W Rutland
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - C Andrew Salzberg
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Safran T, Nepon H, Chu CK, Winocour S, Murphy AM, Davison PG, Dionisopolos T, Vorstenbosch J. Current Concepts in Capsular Contracture: Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Management. Semin Plast Surg 2021; 35:189-197. [PMID: 34526867 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Over 400,000 women in the United States alone will have breast implant surgery each year. Although capsular contracture represents the most common complication of breast implant surgery, surgeons continue to debate the precise etiology. General agreement exists concerning the inflammatory origin of capsular fibrosis, but the inciting events triggering the inflammatory cascade appear to be multifactorial, making it difficult to predict why one patient may develop capsular contracture while another will not. Accordingly, researchers have explored many different surgical, biomaterial, and medical therapies to address these multiple factors in an attempt to prevent and treat capsular contracture. In the current paper, we aim to inform the reader on the most up-to-date understanding of the pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of capsular contracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Safran
- Division of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hillary Nepon
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carrie K Chu
- Department of Plastic Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sebastian Winocour
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Amanda M Murphy
- Division of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter G Davison
- Division of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Vanni G, Materazzo M, Pellicciaro M, Morando L, Portarena I, Anemona L, D'Angelillo MR, Barbarino R, Chiaravalloti A, Meucci R, Perretta T, Deiana C, Orsaria P, Caspi J, Pistolese CA, Buonomo OC. Does Age Matter? Estimating Risks of Locoregional Recurrence After Breast-conservative Surgery. In Vivo 2021; 34:1125-1132. [PMID: 32354901 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM In 2016, in the United States, more than 50% of breast cancer (BC) cases were diagnosed in patients older than 60 years of age. Our study aimed to estimate the risk of locoregional recurrence (LR) in patients who underwent breast-conservative treatment (BCT), according to age. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective monocentric study analyzed 613 cases of patients who underwent BCT between 2003 and 2014. Patients were divided into groups according to age: Under70 (under 70 years old) and Over70 (above 70 years old). Margins width, histology results, prognostic and predictive factors were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients who experienced LR. RESULTS LR Incidence among Under70 and Over70 was 5.4% and 1.7%, respectively (p<0.01). Group Over70 is characterized by larger tumors and a lower Ki67 index (p<0.01). CONCLUSION Operation time reduction, better aesthetic results and reduced LR risk support BCT. The Over70 group exhibited better outcomes in terms of LR despite larger tumor dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Vanni
- Breast Unit - Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Materazzo
- Breast Unit - Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Pellicciaro
- Breast Unit - Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Ljuba Morando
- Breast Unit - Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Portarena
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia Anemona
- Anatomic Pathology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Rolando D'Angelillo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosaria Barbarino
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Agostino Chiaravalloti
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.,IRCCS Neuromed, UOC Medicina Nucleare, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Rosaria Meucci
- Breast Unit - Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Perretta
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Deiana
- Breast Unit - Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Orsaria
- Department of Breast Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Jonathan Caspi
- Breast Unit - Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Adriana Pistolese
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Oreste Claudio Buonomo
- Breast Unit - Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vanni G, Pellicciaro M, Materazzo M, Dauri M, D'angelillo RM, Buonomo C, De Majo A, Pistolese C, Portarena I, Mauriello A, Servadei F, Giacobbi E, Chiaravalloti A, Buonomo OC. Awake breast cancer surgery: strategy in the beginning of COVID-19 emergency. Breast Cancer 2020; 28:137-144. [PMID: 32734327 PMCID: PMC7391474 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-020-01137-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Introduction COVID-19 is a declared worldwide pandemic. In our country, due to shortage of hospitals and beds in intensive care unit, oncological and breast cancer (BC) resources are temporarily shifted to COVID-19 patients. In addition, risk of cross-infections should be considered in these frail patients. To accomplish more surgical procedures and to reduce the length of hospital stay (LOS), fast track awake BC surgery should be implemented. The aim of the study is to estimate the effects of surgical shift in our facility during the early COVID-19 outbreak. Materials and methods From 30th January 2020 to 30th of March 2020, 86 consecutive patients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into pre-COVID-19-BC and COVID-19-BC. Clinical parameters and anamnestic data were collected and analyzed. Surgical procedures, relative complications and type of anaesthesia were reported. The effect on surgical time (ST), operative room time (ORT) and length of stay (LOS) were described and examined. Results No statistical difference was found in complications rate, clinical data and surgical procedures (p > 0.05). Awake breast conservative surgery (BCS) was the most frequent procedure in COVID-19-BC (p = 0.006). A statistically significant decrease in ORT and LOS was reported in COVID-19-BC (p = 0.040 and p = 0.0015 respectively), while comparable time resulted for ST (p = 0.976). Mean ORT and LOS reduction were 20.79 min and 0.57 hospital bed days. Conclusion In the “COVID-19 era”, fast track awake breast surgery provides a reduction of ORT, LOS and potentially surgical treatment for a wider number of oncological patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Vanni
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Marco Pellicciaro
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy.
| | - Marco Materazzo
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Mario Dauri
- Department of Emergency and Admission, Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Anesthetic Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Rolando Maria D'angelillo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Chiara Buonomo
- Department of Emergency and Admission, Critical Care Medicine, Pain Medicine and Anesthetic Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Adriano De Majo
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Chiara Pistolese
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Ilaria Portarena
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mauriello
- Anatomic Pathology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Francesca Servadei
- Anatomic Pathology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Erica Giacobbi
- Anatomic Pathology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Agostino Chiaravalloti
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy.,IRCCS Neuromed, UOC Medicina Nucleare, Via Atinense 18, 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy
| | - Oreste Claudio Buonomo
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, RM, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Santori F, Vanni G, Buonomo OC, De Majo A, Rho M, Granai AV, Pellicciaro M, Cotesta M, Assogna M, D'Angelillo RM, Materazzo M. Ulcerated breast cancer with single brain metastasis: A combined surgical approach. Clinical presentation at one year follow up - A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2020; 73:75-78. [PMID: 32650258 PMCID: PMC7341038 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.06.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Solitary brain metastasis of breast cancer in a patient with neurological symptoms as first presentation is a rare complication. Simultaneously perform a metastasectomy surgery plus right mastectomy, right axillary dissection and immediate breast reconstruction is unusual event. Successful combined surgical approach in a stage IV de novo breast cancer patient with single site brain metastasis at one year follow-up. Combined surgical approach offers the opportunity to treat two different oncological urgencies, reducing the unnecessary repeated surgical and anesthesiologic trauma.
Introduction Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in woman. Approximately 5–10% of breast cancer occurs as de novo stage IV and some studies have shown that from 10% to 30% of those patients presents Brain Metastasis. Presentation of case In this study, we report a case of solitary brain metastasis of breast cancer in a 63-year-old Italian Caucasian woman with neurological symptoms as first clinical presentation. After the correct diagnosis and multidisciplinary meeting it was decided to simultaneously perform a metastasectomy surgery plus right mastectomy, right axillary dissection and immediate breast reconstruction. In our clinical practice we report a successful combined surgical approach in a stage IV de novo breast cancer patient with single site brain metastasis at one year follow-up. Discussion Metastasectomy plus mastectomy provided neurological control of acute complication of metastatic disease and complete breast cancer local control. One-time operation could be the best option when diagnosis of breast cancer is made thanks to the onset of oncological emergency like intracranial hypertension due to single brain metastasis. Conclusion Combined surgical approach offers the opportunity to treat two different oncological urgencies, reducing the unnecessary repeated surgical and anesthesiologic trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Santori
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Gianluca Vanni
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Oreste Claudio Buonomo
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Adriano De Majo
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maurizio Rho
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Alessandra Vittoria Granai
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Marco Pellicciaro
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Maria Cotesta
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Massimo Assogna
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Rolando Maria D'Angelillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Marco Materazzo
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vanni G, Materazzo M, Santori F, Pellicciaro M, Costesta M, Orsaria P, Cattadori F, Pistolese CA, Perretta T, Chiocchi M, Meucci R, Lamacchia F, Assogna M, Caspi J, Granai AV, DE Majo A, Chiaravalloti A, D'Angelillo MR, Barbarino R, Ingallinella S, Morando L, Dalli S, Portarena I, Altomare V, Tazzioli G, Buonomo OC. The Effect of Coronavirus (COVID-19) on Breast Cancer Teamwork: A Multicentric Survey. In Vivo 2020; 34:1685-1694. [PMID: 32503830 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Despite the large amount of clinical data available of Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19), not many studies have been conducted about the psychological toll on Health Care Workers (HCWs). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicentric descriptive study, surveys were distributed among 4 different Breast Cancer Centers (BCC). BCCs were distinguished according to COVID-19 tertiary care hospital (COVID/No-COVID) and district prevalence (DP) (High vs. Low). DASS-21 score, PSS score and demographic data (age, sex, work) were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 51 HCWs were analyzed in the study. Age, work and sex did not demonstrate statistically significant values. Statistically significant distribution was found between DASS-21-stress score and COVID/No-COVID (p=0.043). No difference was found in the remaining DASS-21 and PSS scores, dividing the HCWs according to COVID-19-hospital and DP. CONCLUSION Working in a COVID-19-hospital represents a factor that negatively affects psychosocial well-being. However, DP seems not to affect the psychosocial well-being of BCC HCWs. During the outbreak, psychological support for low risk HCWs should be provided regardless DP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Vanni
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Materazzo
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Santori
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Pellicciaro
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Costesta
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Orsaria
- Department of Breast Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Cattadori
- UO Breast Surgery, Breast Unit, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Chiara Adriana Pistolese
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Perretta
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Chiocchi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosaria Meucci
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Feliciana Lamacchia
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Assogna
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Jonathan Caspi
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Adriano DE Majo
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Agostino Chiaravalloti
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.,IRCCS Neuromed, UOC Medicina Nucleare, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Maria Rolando D'Angelillo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosaria Barbarino
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Ingallinella
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Ljuba Morando
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Dalli
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Portarena
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Vittorio Altomare
- Department of Breast Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tazzioli
- Oncologic Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Oreste Claudio Buonomo
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|