Ileocecal valve syndrome and vitamin b12 deficiency after surgery: a multicentric prospective study

Metabolic and Nutritional Issues after Lower Digestive Tract Surgery: The Important Role of the Dietitian in a Multidisciplinary Setting

Many patients undergo small bowel and colon surgery for reasons related to malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), mesenteric ischemia, and other benign conditions, including post-operative adhesions, hernias, trauma, volvulus, or diverticula. Some patients arrive in the operating theatre severely malnourished due to an underlying disease, while others develop complications (e.g., anastomotic leaks, abscesses, or strictures) that induce a systemic inflammatory response that can increase their energy and protein requirements. Finally, anatomical and functional changes resulting from surgery can affect either nutritional status due to malabsorption or nutritional support (NS) pathways. The dietitian providing NS to these patients needs to understand the pathophysiology underlying these sequelae and collaborate with other professionals, including surgeons, internists, nurses, and pharmacists. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the nutritional and metabolic consequences of different types of lower gastrointestinal surgery and the role of the dietitian in providing comprehensive patient care. This article reviews the effects of small bowel resection on macronutrient and micronutrient absorption, the effects of colectomies (e.g., ileocolectomy, low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, and proctocolectomy) that require special dietary considerations, nutritional considerations specific to ostomized patients, and clinical practice guidelines for caregivers of patients who have undergone a surgery for local and systemic complications of IBD. Finally, we highlight the valuable contribution of the dietitian in the challenging management of short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure.

Repurposing an ACE Malone Channel for Continent Intermittent Catheterization During Re-augmentation Cecocystoplasty: The MACEtrofanoff Procedure

OBJECTIVE

To describe a surgical alternative option in select patients with neurogenic bladder and a history of Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) who now require revision augmentation of the bladder, and/or creation of a new continent catherizable urinary channel (CCC).

METHODS

Herein, we describe a novel surgical approach for patients who have had prior MACE creation who subsequently require surgical revision and creation of a new CCC. Rather than the traditional approach of creating a new CCC utilizing bowel, we perform a cecocystoplasty and leave the previously created MACE intact. The prior MACE channel becomes repurposed as the new Mitrofanoff, which we have termed the MACEtrofanoff channel. Concomitant cecostomy tube placement for bowel management can be performed at the time of surgery.

RESULTS

We have successfully performed this procedure in 2 patients with good outcomes to date. This technique does not require the sacrifice of the prior appendix channel, nor require the formation of a new stoma and channel. Patients are able to adapt easily to clean intermittent catheterization through a channel they are already familiar with for their prior antegrade enemas.

CONCLUSION

In select patients, surgeons should consider the MACEtrofanoff procedure to avoid the added morbidity of further bowel mobilization.