1
|
Donisi G, Zerbi A. Exploring the landscape of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: Progress, challenges, and future directions. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:3094-3103. [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery (MI) has become the standard of care for many surgical procedures aimed at reducing the burden on patients. However, its adoption in pancreatic surgery (PS) has been limited by the pancreas’s unique location and the complexity of the dissection and reconstruction phases. These factors continue to contribute to PS having one of the highest morbidity and mortality rates in general surgery. Despite a rough start, MIPS has gained widespread acceptance in clinical practice recently. Robust evidence supports MI distal pancreatectomy safety, even in oncological cases, indicating its potential superiority over open surgery. However, definitive evidence of MI pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) feasibility and safety, particularly for malignant lesions, is still lacking. Nonetheless, reports from high-volume centers are emerging, suggesting outcomes comparable to those of the open approach. The robotic PS increasing adoption, facilitated by the wider availability of robotic platforms, may further facilitate the transition to MIPD by overcoming the technical constraints associated with laparoscopy and accelerating the learning curve. Although the MIPS implementation process cannot be stopped in this evolving world, ensuring patient safety through strict outcome monitoring is critical. Investing in younger surgeons with structured and recognized training programs can promote safe expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greta Donisi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duan P, Sun L, Kou K, Li XR, Zhang P. Surgical techniques to prevent delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024; 23:449-457. [PMID: 37980179 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). DGE represents impaired gastric motility without significant mechanical obstruction and is associated with an increased length of hospital stay, increased healthcare costs, and a high readmission rate. We reviewed published studies on various technical modifications to reduce the incidence of DGE. DATA SOURCES Studies were identified by searching PubMed for relevant articles published up to December 2022. The following search terms were used: "pancreaticoduodenectomy", "pancreaticojejunostomy", "pancreaticogastrostomy", "gastric emptying", "gastroparesis" and "postoperative complications". The search was limited to English publications. Additional articles were identified by a manual search of references from key articles. RESULTS In recent years, various surgical procedures and techniques have been explored to reduce the incidence of DGE. Pyloric resection, Billroth II reconstruction, Braun's enteroenterostomy, and antecolic reconstruction may be associated with a decreased incidence of DGE, but more high-powered studies are needed in the future. Neither laparoscopic nor robotic surgery has demonstrated superiority in preventing DGE, and the use of staplers is controversial regarding whether they can reduce the incidence of DGE. CONCLUSIONS Despite many innovations in surgical techniques, there is no surgical procedure that is superior to others to reduce DGE. Further larger prospective randomized studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Duan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Lu Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Kai Kou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Xin-Rui Li
- Department of Dental Implantology, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dai M, Chen L, Xu Q, Cui M, Li P, Liu W, Lin C, Chen W, Chen H, Yuan S. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Evaluation and Analysis of Surgical Efficacy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:7043-7051. [PMID: 39008209 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15764-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence is limited for the treatment of pancreatic cancer among minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS This retrospective analysis evaluated patients who underwent robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) or laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) from April 2016 to April 2023. Their baseline and perioperative data, including operative time, R0 resection rates, and severe complications rates, were analyzed, and the follow-up data, such as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), were collected. RESULTS A total of 253 cases of LPD and RPD were performed, and 101 cases with pancreatic cancer were included, of which 54 were LPD and 47 were RPD. The conversion rate (4.3% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.001) and blood loss (400 vs. 575 mL, p < 0.05) were lower in the RPD group. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, vessel resection rates, and TNM-stage diagnosis; however, R0 resection rates (80.9% vs. 70.4%) and lymph node harvest (24.2 vs. 21.9) had a higher tendency in the RPD group, and postoperative length of stay was shorter in the RPD cohort (11 vs. 13 days). Moreover, improved 1- to 3-years DFS (75.7%, 61.7%, and 36.0% vs. 59.0%, 35.6%, and 21.9%) and OS (94.7%, 84.7%, and 50.8% vs. 84.1%, 63.6%, and 45.5%) was found in the RPD group in comparison with the LPD group. CONCLUSIONS RPD had advantages in surgical safety and oncological outcomes compared with LPD, but was similar to the latter in perioperative outcomes. Long-term outcomes require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menghua Dai
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
| | - Lixin Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Cui
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Pengyu Li
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjing Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Weijie Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Haomin Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shuai Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lai TJ, Roxburgh C, Boyd KA, Bouttell J. Clinical effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic and open surgery: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e076750. [PMID: 39284694 PMCID: PMC11409398 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To undertake a review of systematic reviews on the clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery across a mix of intracavity procedures, using evidence mapping to inform the decision makers on the best utilisation of robotic-assisted surgery. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included systematic reviews with randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials describing any clinical outcomes. DATA SOURCES Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library from 2017 to 2023. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS We first presented the number of systematic reviews distributed in different specialties. We then mapped the body of evidence across selected procedures and synthesised major findings of clinical outcomes. We used a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews to evaluate the quality of systematic reviews. The overlap of primary studies was managed by the corrected covered area method. RESULTS Our search identified 165 systematic reviews published addressing clinical evidence of robotic-assisted surgery. We found that for all outcomes except operative time, the evidence was largely positive or neutral for robotic-assisted surgery versus both open and laparoscopic alternatives. Evidence was more positive versus open. The evidence for the operative time was mostly negative. We found that most systematic reviews were of low quality due to a failure to deal with the inherent bias in observational evidence. CONCLUSION Robotic surgery has a strong clinical effectiveness evidence base to support the expanded use of robotic-assisted surgery in six common intracavity procedures, which may provide an opportunity to increase the proportion of minimally invasive surgeries. Given the high incremental cost of robotic-assisted surgery and longer operative time, future economic studies are required to determine the optimal use of robotic-assisted surgery capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Jung Lai
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Campbell Roxburgh
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kathleen Anne Boyd
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Janet Bouttell
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Masoud SJ, Saxton AT, Lidsky ME, Martin AN, Herbert GS, Blazer DG, Allen PJ, Cerullo M. Market Factors, Not Quality, Influence Reimbursement for Pancreaticoduodenectomy in an Era of Price Transparency. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15877-7. [PMID: 39060688 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15877-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) price transparency rule tries to facilitate cost-conscious decision-making. For surgical services, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), factors mediating transparency and real-world reimbursement are not well described. METHODS The Leapfrog Survey was used to identify United States hospitals performing PD. Financial and operational data were obtained from Turquoise Health and CMS Cost Reports. Chi-square tests and modified Poisson regression evaluated associations with reimbursement disclosure. Two-part logistic and gamma regression models estimated effects of hospital factors on commercial, Medicare, and self-pay reimbursements for PD. RESULTS Of 452 Leapfrog hospitals, 295 (65%) disclosed PD hospital or procedure reimbursements. Disclosing hospitals were larger (beds > 200: 81.0% vs. 71.3%, p = 0.04), reported higher net margins (0.7% vs. - 2.1%, p = 0.04), more likely for-profit (26.1% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001), and teaching-affiliated (82.0% vs. 65.6%, p < 0.001). Nonprofit status conferred hospitalization reimbursement increases of $8683-$12,329, while moderate market concentration predicted savings up to $5066. Teaching affiliation conferred reimbursement increases of $4589-$16,393 for hospitalizations and $644 for procedures. Top Leapfrog volume ratings predicted an increase of up to $7795 for only Medicare hospitalization reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS Nondisclosure of hospital and procedural reimbursements for PD remains a major issue. Transparency was noted in hospitals with higher margins, size, and academic affiliation. Factors associated with higher reimbursement were non-profit status, academic affiliation, and more equitable market share. Reimbursement inconsistently tracked with PD quality or volume measures. Policy changes may be required to incentivize reimbursement disclosure and translate transparency into increased value for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabran J Masoud
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Anthony T Saxton
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael E Lidsky
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Allison N Martin
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Garth S Herbert
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Dan G Blazer
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marcelo Cerullo
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bauschke A, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Ali-Deeb A, Ardelt M, Dondorf F, Rauchfuss F, Rohland O, Tekbaș A, Settmacher U. Rare tumours of the pancreas: monocentric study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:349. [PMID: 39002034 PMCID: PMC11246325 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05884-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The biology of rare pancreatic tumours, which differs from that of ductal pancreatic cancer, requires increased attention. Although the majority of rare pancreatic tumours are benign, it is difficult to decide whether an invasive component exists without complete removal of the lesion, despite considerable progress in diagnosis. We are investigating a large cohort of patients with histologically confirmed epithelial non-ductal non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas. METHODS Here we analyze long-term survival from patients, who underwent resection of histologically confirmed epithelial non-ductal non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas. At our department between Jan 1st, 1999, and Dec 31st, 2019. The median follow-up was 61 (range 0-168) month. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) software. RESULTS 46 patients (48%) were followed up for more than 5 years, 18 patients (19%) for more than 10 years. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates for rare non-invasive pancreatic tumours were 72% and 55% respectively. The proportion of rare tumour entities (non-ductal and non-neuroendocrine) increased continuously and statistically significantly (p = 0.004) from 4.2 to 12.3% in our clinic between 1999 and 2019. If there is no invasive growth yet, there is a varying risk of malignant degeneration in the course of the disease. Therefore, the indication for pancreatic resection is still the subject of discussion. CONCLUSION The long-term prognosis of rare epithelial pancreatic tumours after R0 resection-even if they are already malignant-is much better than that of ductal pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Bauschke
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany
| | - Aladdin Ali-Deeb
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Michael Ardelt
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Felix Dondorf
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Falk Rauchfuss
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Oliver Rohland
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Aysun Tekbaș
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Amirkhosravi F, Allenson KC, Moore LW, Kolman JM, Foster M, Hsu E, Sasangohar F, Dhala A. Multimodal prehabilitation and postoperative outcomes in upper abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:16012. [PMID: 38992072 PMCID: PMC11239889 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66633-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
The impact of multimodal prehabilitation on postoperative complications in upper abdominal surgeries is understudied. This review analyzes randomized trials on multimodal prehabilitation with patient and hospital outcomes. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for trials on prehabilitation before elective (non-emergency) abdominal surgery. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and all-cause complications; secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care length of stay. A meta-analysis with random-effect models was performed, and heterogeneity was evaluated with I-square and Cochran's Q test. Dichotomous variables were reported in log-odds ratio and continuous variables were presented as mean difference. Ten studies (total 1503 patients) were included. Odds of developing complications after prehabilitation were significantly lower compared to various control groups (- 0.38 [- 0.75- - 0.004], P = 0.048). Five studies described PPCs, and participants with prehabilitation had decreased odds of PPC (- 0.96 [- 1.38- - 0.54], P < 0.001). Prehabilitation did not significantly reduce length of stay, unless exercise was implemented; with exercise, hospital stay decreased significantly (- 0.91 [- 1.67- - 0.14], P = 0.02). Multimodal prehabilitation may decrease complications in upper abdominal surgery, but not necessarily length of stay; research should address heterogeneity in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Linda W Moore
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jacob M Kolman
- Office of Faculty and Research Development, Department of Academic Affairs, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Margaret Foster
- School of Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Enshuo Hsu
- Center for Health Data Science and Analytics, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Farzan Sasangohar
- Wm Michael Barnes '64 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
- Center for Critical Care, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Atiya Dhala
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Emmen AMLH, Zwart MJW, Khatkov IE, Boggi U, Groot Koerkamp B, Busch OR, Saint-Marc O, Dokmak S, Molenaar IQ, D'Hondt M, Ramera M, Keck T, Ferrari G, Luyer MDP, Moraldi L, Ielpo B, Wittel U, Souche FR, Hackert T, Lips D, Can MF, Bosscha K, Fara R, Festen S, van Dieren S, Coratti A, De Hingh I, Mazzola M, Wellner U, De Meyere C, van Santvoort HC, Aussilhou B, Ibenkhayat A, de Wilde RF, Kauffmann EF, Tyutyunnik P, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study. Surgery 2024; 175:1587-1594. [PMID: 38570225 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasing, yet large adjusted analyses that can be generalized internationally are lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in a pan-European cohort. METHODS An international multicenter retrospective study including patients after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy from 50 centers in 12 European countries (2009-2020). Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥III). RESULTS Among 2,082 patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy, 1,006 underwent robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and 1,076 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. After matching 812 versus 812 patients, the rates of major morbidity (31.9% vs 29.6%; P = .347) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (4.3% vs 4.6%; P = .904) did not differ significantly between robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, respectively. Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate (6.7% vs 18.0%; P < .001) and higher lymph node retrieval (16 vs 14; P = .003). Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with shorter operation time (446 minutes versus 400 minutes; P < .001), and lower rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (19.0% vs 11.7%; P < .001), delayed gastric emptying grade B/C (21.4% vs 7.4%; P < .001), and a higher R0-resection rate (73.2% vs 84.4%; P < .001). CONCLUSION This European multicenter study found no differences in overall major morbidity and 30-day/in-hospital mortality after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Further, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, shorter length of stay, and a higher R0 resection rate than robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy. In contrast, robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate and a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes as compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk M L H Emmen
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://www.twitter.com/AnoukEmmen
| | - Maurice J W Zwart
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://www.twitter.com/mauricezwart
| | - Igor E Khatkov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Russia
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier Saint-Marc
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Endocrinienne et Thoracique, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Orleans, France
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB surgery and liver transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France. University Paris Cité
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Marco Ramera
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Tobias Keck
- Clinic for Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Department of Oncological and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Luca Moraldi
- Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Benedetto Ielpo
- Department of Surgery, HPB unit, University Mar Hospital, Parc Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Uwe Wittel
- Department of Surgery, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francois-Regis Souche
- Department de Chirurgie Digestive (A), Mini-invasive et Oncologigue, Hôspital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Dept. of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Daan Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Regis Fara
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Européen Marseille, France
| | | | - Susan van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Ignace De Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Michele Mazzola
- Department of Oncological and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Ulrich Wellner
- Clinic for Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Béatrice Aussilhou
- Department of HPB surgery and liver transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France. University Paris Cité
| | - Abdallah Ibenkhayat
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Endocrinienne et Thoracique, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Orleans, France
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pavel Tyutyunnik
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Russia
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stefanova I, Vescio F, Nickel F, Merali N, Ammendola M, Lahiri RP, Pencavel TD, Worthington TR, Frampton AE. What are the true benefits of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with pancreatic cancer? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 18:133-139. [PMID: 38712525 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2351398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease, and multimodal treatment including high-quality surgery can improve survival outcomes. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has evolved with minimally invasive approaches including the implementation of robotic PD (RPD). In this special report, we review the literature whilst evaluating the 'true benefits' of RPD compared to open approach for the treatment of PDAC. AREAS COVERED We have performed a mini-review of studies assessing PD approaches and compared intraoperative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, post-operative complications and oncological outcomes. EXPERT OPINION RPD was associated with similar or longer operative times, and reduced intra-operative blood loss. Perioperative pain scores were significantly lower with shorter lengths of stay with the robotic approach. With regards to post-operative complications, post-operative pancreatic fistula rates were similar, with lower rates of clinically relevant fistulas after RPD. Oncological outcomes were comparable or superior in terms of margin status, lymph node harvest, time to chemotherapy and survival between RPD and OPD. In conclusion, RPD allows safe implementation of minimally invasive PD. The current literature shows that RPD is either equivalent, or superior in certain aspects to OPD. Once more centers gain sufficient experience, RPD is likely to demonstrate clear superiority over alternative approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irena Stefanova
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Francesca Vescio
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
- General Surgery Unit, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nabeel Merali
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
- Section of Oncology, Deptartment of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, FHMS, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Michele Ammendola
- General Surgery Unit, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Rajiv P Lahiri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Tim D Pencavel
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Tim R Worthington
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Adam E Frampton
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
- Section of Oncology, Deptartment of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, FHMS, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Butano V, Ross SB, Sucandy I, Christodoulou M, Pattilachan TM, Neumeier R, Rosemurgy A. Effect of insurance status on perioperative outcomes after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-score matched analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:90. [PMID: 38386222 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01841-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
The influence of Medicaid or being uninsured is prevailingly thought to negatively impact a patient's socioeconomic and postoperative course, yet little has been published to support this claim specifically in reference to robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study was undertaken to determine impact of health insurance type on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Following IRB approval, we prospectively followed 364 patients who underwent robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients were stratified by insurance status (i.e., Private, Medicare, and Medicaid/Uninsured); 100 patients were 2:2:1 propensity-score matched by age, BMI, ASA class, pathology, 8th edition AJCC staging, and tumor size. Perioperative variables were compared utilizing contingency testing and ANOVA. Statistical significance was accepted at a p-value ≤ 0.05 and data are presented as median (mean ± SD). The 100 patients undergoing propensity-score matching were 64 (65 ± 9.1) years old with a BMI of 27 (27 ± 4.9) kg/m2 and ASA class of 3 (3 ± 0.5). Operative duration was 421 (428 ± 105.9) minutes and estimated blood loss was 200 (385 ± 795.0) mL. There were 4 in-hospital deaths and 8 readmissions within 30 days of discharge. Total hospital cost was $32,064 (38,014 ± 22,205.94). After matching, no differences were found in pre-, intra-, and short-term postoperative variables among patients with different insurances, including hospital cost and time to initiate adjuvant treatment, which was 8 (9 ± 7.9) weeks for patients with malignant disease. In our hepatopancreaticobiliary program, health insurance status did not impact perioperative outcomes or hospital costs. These findings highlight that financial coverage does not influence quality of perioperative care, reinforcing the equity of robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Butano
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Sharona B Ross
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA.
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Maria Christodoulou
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Tara M Pattilachan
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Ruth Neumeier
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| | - Alexander Rosemurgy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, 3000 Medical Park Drive, Suite#500, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu R, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG, Hackert T, Palanivelu C, Zhao Y, He J, Boggi U, Jang JY, Panaro F, Goh BKP, Efanov M, Nagakawa Y, Kim HJ, Yin X, Zhao Z, Shyr YM, Iyer S, Kakiashvili E, Han HS, Lee JH, Croner R, Wang SE, Marino MV, Prasad A, Wang W, He S, Yang K, Liu Q, Wang Z, Li M, Xu S, Wei K, Deng Z, Jia Y, van Ramshorst TME. International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2024; 13:89-104. [PMID: 38322212 PMCID: PMC10839730 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-23-132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Background With the rapid development of robotic surgery, especially for the abdominal surgery, robotic pancreatic surgery (RPS) has been applied increasingly around the world. However, evidence-based guidelines regarding its application, safety, and efficacy are still lacking. To harvest robust evidence and comprehensive clinical practice, this study aims to develop international guidelines on the use of RPS. Methods World Health Organization (WHO) Handbook for Guideline Development, GRADE Grid method, Delphi vote, and the AGREE-II instrument were used to establish the Guideline Steering Group, Guideline Development Group, and Guideline Secretary Group, formulate 19 clinical questions, develop the recommendations, and draft the guidelines. Three online meetings were held on 04/12/2020, 30/11/2021, and 25/01/2022 to vote on the recommendations and get advice and suggestions from all involved experts. All the experts focusing on minimally invasive surgery from America, Europe and Oceania made great contributions to this consensus guideline. Results After a systematic literature review 176 studies were included, 19 questions were addressed and 14 recommendations were developed through the expert assessment and comprehensive judgment of the quality and credibility of the evidence. Conclusions The international RPS guidelines can guide current practice for surgeons, patients, medical societies, hospital administrators, and related social communities. Further randomized trials are required to determine the added value of RPS as compared to open and laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chinnusamy Palanivelu
- Department of Minimal Invasive Hernia Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Yupei Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of Surgery/Division of HBP Surgery & Transplantation, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Brian K. P. Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hong-Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Xiaoyu Yin
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiming Zhao
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yi-Ming Shyr
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
| | - Shridhar Iyer
- Division of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eli Kakiashvili
- Department of Surgery, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Roland Croner
- Department of General-, Vascular-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Shin-E Wang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
| | - Marco Vito Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
| | - Arun Prasad
- Department of General and Minimal Access Surgery and Robotic Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Songqing He
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Kehu Yang
- EvidenceBased Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qu Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zizheng Wang
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mengyang Li
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shuai Xu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kongyuan Wei
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhaoda Deng
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuze Jia
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tess M. E. van Ramshorst
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pacella G, Brunese MC, D’Imperio E, Rotondo M, Scacchi A, Carbone M, Guerra G. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Update of CT-Based Radiomics Applications in the Pre-Surgical Prediction of the Risk of Post-Operative Fistula, Resectability Status and Prognosis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7380. [PMID: 38068432 PMCID: PMC10707069 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Surgical resection is the main driver to improving survival in resectable tumors, while neoadjuvant treatment based on chemotherapy (and radiotherapy) is the best option-treatment for a non-primally resectable disease. CT-based imaging has a central role in detecting, staging, and managing PDAC. As several authors have proposed radiomics for risk stratification in patients undergoing surgery for PADC, in this narrative review, we have explored the actual fields of interest of radiomics tools in PDAC built on pre-surgical imaging and clinical variables, to obtain more objective and reliable predictors. METHODS The PubMed database was searched for papers published in the English language no earlier than January 2018. RESULTS We found 301 studies, and 11 satisfied our research criteria. Of those included, four were on resectability status prediction, three on preoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) prediction, and four on survival prediction. Most of the studies were retrospective. CONCLUSIONS It is possible to conclude that many performing models have been developed to get predictive information in pre-surgical evaluation. However, all the studies were retrospective, lacking further external validation in prospective and multicentric cohorts. Furthermore, the radiomics models and the expression of results should be standardized and automatized to be applicable in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Pacella
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (G.P.)
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (G.P.)
| | | | - Marco Rotondo
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (G.P.)
| | - Andrea Scacchi
- General Surgery Unit, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Carbone
- San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona Hospital, 84131 Salerno, Italy;
| | - Germano Guerra
- Department of Medicine and Health Science “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; (G.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu GH, Tan XY, Li JX, Zhong GH, Zhai JW, Li MY. A modified Blumgart anastomosis with a simple and practicable procedure after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: our center's experience. BMC Surg 2023; 23:349. [PMID: 37974183 PMCID: PMC10655365 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02221-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD) has become the goal of lots of minimally invasive surgical centers in recent years. Postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) is still the barrier to attaining the above goal. Thus, improving anastomosis techniques to reduce the rate of POPF has been a hotspot of surgery. Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy is considered one of the best anastomosis procedures, with low rates of POPF. However, the original Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy method is not easy for laparoscopic operation. In consequence, we modified a Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy technique with a simple and practicable procedure and applied to LPD. METHODS We collected and retrospectively analyzed the perioperative clinical data of patients who underwent modified Blumgart anastomosis from February 2017 to September 2022. The above patients included 53 cases in open pancreaticojejunostomy(OPD) and 58 cases in LPD. After propensity score matching, 44 cases were included for comparison in each group. RESULTS After propensity score matching, the average time for pancreaticojejunostomy was about 30 min in the LPD group. The Clinically relevant POPF(CR-POPF) rate was 9.1%. The length of postoperative hospitalization was 13.1 days. Compared with the OPD group, The CR-POPF rate in the LPD group are not significant differences. But the postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LPD group. Besides, there were no other severely postoperative complications between two groups. CONCLUSION The modified Blumgart anastomosis technique applied to LPD in our Center not only has simple and convenient properties but also low rate of CR-POPF. And this method may be a good choice for surgeons to begin to carry out LPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo-Hua Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000, China
| | - Xiao-Yu Tan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000, China
| | - Jia-Xing Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000, China
| | - Guo-Hui Zhong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000, China
| | - Jing-Wei Zhai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000, China
| | - Ming-Yi Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kong D, Zhang H, Zhao X, Meng Y, Chai W, Wang Z. Effect of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy on the incidence of surgical-site wound infection: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2023; 20:3682-3689. [PMID: 37277912 PMCID: PMC10588349 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the impact of robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomies on postoperative surgical site wound infections. A comprehensive computerised search of databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang Data, was performed to identify studies comparing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with laparoscopicPD. Relevant studies were searched from the inception of the database construction until April 2023. The meta-analysis outcomes were analysed using odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The RevMan 5.4 software was used for the meta-analysis. The findings of the meta-analysis showed that patients who underwent laparoscopic PD had a significantly lower incidence of surgical-site wound (16.52% vs. 18.92%, OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.90, P = .0005), superficial wound (3.65% vs. 7.57%, OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.39-0.68, P < .001), and deep wound infections (1.09% vs. 2.23%, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34-0.85, P = .008) than those who received robotic PD. However, because of variations in sample size between studies, some studies suffered from methodological quality deficiencies. Therefore, further validation of this result is needed in future studies with higher quality and larger sample sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- De‐Shuai Kong
- Department of Biliary‐pancreatic Surgery ICangzhou Central HospitalCangzhouHebeiChina
| | - Heng‐Le Zhang
- Graduate School of Hebei Medical UniversityShijiazhuangHebeiChina
| | - Xiu‐Lei Zhao
- Department of Biliary‐pancreatic Surgery ICangzhou Central HospitalCangzhouHebeiChina
| | - Yu Meng
- Department of Biliary‐pancreatic Surgery ICangzhou Central HospitalCangzhouHebeiChina
| | - Wei Chai
- Department of Biliary‐pancreatic Surgery ICangzhou Central HospitalCangzhouHebeiChina
| | - Zhen‐Yong Wang
- Department of Biliary‐pancreatic Surgery ICangzhou Central HospitalCangzhouHebeiChina
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aiolfi A, Bona D, Bonitta G, Bonavina L. Effect of gastric ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1633-1643. [PMID: 37498484 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01601-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Ischemia at the anastomotic site is thought to be a protagonist in the development of anastomosis-related complications while different strategies to overcome this problem have been reported. Gastric ischemic conditioning (GIC) prior to esophagectomy has been described with this intent. Evaluate the effect of GIC on anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PubMed were investigated up to March 31st, 2023. We considered articles that appraised short-term outcomes after GIC vs. no GIC in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Anastomotic leak (AL), anastomotic stricture (AS), and gastric conduit necrosis (GCN) were primary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used as pooled effect size measures, whereas 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to calculate related inference. Fourteen studies (1760 patients) were included. Of those, 732 (41.6%) underwent GIC, while 1028 (58.4%) underwent one-step esophagectomy. Compared with no GIC, GIC was related to a reduced RR for AL (R RR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.86; p < 0.01) and AS (RR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.29-0.91; p = 0.02), whereas no differences were found for GCN (RR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.19-1.61; p = 0.28). Postoperative pneumonia (RR = 1.09; p = 0.99), overall complications (RR = 0.87; p = 0.19), operative time (SMD - 0.58; p = 0.07), hospital stay (SMD 0.66; p = 0.09), and 30-day mortality (RR = 0.69; p = 0.22) were comparable. GIC prior to esophagectomy seems associated with a reduced risk for AL and AS. Further studies are necessary to identify the subset of patients who can benefit from this procedure, the optimal technique, and the timing of GIC prior to esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Aiolfi
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy.
| | - Davide Bona
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Bonitta
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fernandes EDSM, de Mello FPT, Braga EP, de Souza GO, Andrade R, Pimentel LS, Girão CL, Siqueira M, Moraes-Junior JMA, de Oliveira RV, Goldaracena N, Torres OJM. A more radical perspective on surgical approach and outcomes in pancreatic cancer-a narrative review. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14:1964-1981. [PMID: 37720458 PMCID: PMC10502544 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a dismal disease and is expected to become an even greater burden in the near future. This review focuses on the different surgical aspects for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), distal and total pancreatectomy (TP), incorporating lessons from both the western and eastern visions in treating pancreatic cancer. Methods We conducted an extensive literature review through PubMed, prioritizing papers published in the last 5 years, but older emblematic papers were also included. We included articles that explored the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with focus on the surgical aspect and strategies to improve outcomes. References of selected articles were also reviewed to identify any missed studies. Only papers in English were included. Key Content and Findings As evidence continues to build, it is clear that both systemic and surgical therapies have a fundamental and complementary role. State of art surgical treatment encompasses complete mesopancreas excision for radical lymphadenectomy. Preoperative planning of dissection planes, extensive knowledge of vascular anatomic variations, oncological principles and expertise for vascular resections are mandatory to perform a more radical operation, in pursuit of improved outcomes. Conclusions Based on current data, patient selection remains key and a more radical surgical approach brings more accomplishing results bringing as to believe that more is better.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo de Souza M. Fernandes
- Departament of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, São Lucas Copacabana Hospital-Rede Dasa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, Adventista Silvestre Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho-UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Felipe Pedreira T. de Mello
- Departament of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, São Lucas Copacabana Hospital-Rede Dasa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, Adventista Silvestre Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Pinho Braga
- Departament of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, São Lucas Copacabana Hospital-Rede Dasa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Gabrielle Oliveira de Souza
- Departament of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, São Lucas Copacabana Hospital-Rede Dasa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Ronaldo Andrade
- Departament of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, São Lucas Copacabana Hospital-Rede Dasa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, Adventista Silvestre Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Leandro Savattone Pimentel
- Departament of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, São Lucas Copacabana Hospital-Rede Dasa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, Adventista Silvestre Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Camila Liberato Girão
- Departament of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, São Lucas Copacabana Hospital-Rede Dasa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, Adventista Silvestre Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Munique Siqueira
- Departament of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, São Lucas Copacabana Hospital-Rede Dasa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, Adventista Silvestre Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - José Maria A. Moraes-Junior
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, São Domingos Hospital-Rede Dasa, São Luís, MA, Brazil
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, Hospital Presidente Dutra, São Luis, MA, Brazil
| | | | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Orlando Jorge M. Torres
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, São Domingos Hospital-Rede Dasa, São Luís, MA, Brazil
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Transplant Surgery, Hospital Presidente Dutra, São Luis, MA, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Uijterwijk BA, Wei K, Kasai M, Ielpo B, Hilst JV, Chinnusamy P, Lemmers DHL, Burdio F, Senthilnathan P, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M, Qin R. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1351-1361. [PMID: 37076411 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assessment of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is scarce and limited to non-randomized studies. This study aimed to compare oncological and surgical outcomes after MIPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) for patients after resectable PDAC from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS A systematic review was performed to identify RCTs comparing MIPD and OPD including PDAC (Jan 2015-July 2021). Individual data of patients with PDAC were requested. Primary outcomes were R0 rate and lymph node yield. Secondary outcomes were blood-loss, operation time, major complications, hospital stay and 90-day mortality. RESULTS Overall, 4 RCTs (all addressed laparoscopic MIPD) with 275 patients with PDAC were included. In total, 128 patients underwent laparoscopic MIPD and 147 patients underwent OPD. The R0 rate (risk difference(RD) -1%, P = 0.740) and lymph node yield (mean difference(MD) +1.55, P = 0.305) were comparable between laparoscopic MIPD and OPD. Laparoscopic MIPD was associated with less perioperative blood-loss (MD -91ml, P = 0.026), shorter length of hospital stay (MD -3.8 days, P = 0.044), while operation time was longer (MD +98.5 min, P = 0.003). Major complications (RD -11%, P = 0.302) and 90-day mortality (RD -2%, P = 0.328) were comparable between laparoscopic MIPD and OPD. CONCLUSIONS This individual patient data meta-analysis of MIPD versus OPD in patients with resectable PDAC suggests that laparoscopic MIPD is non-inferior regarding radicality, lymph node yield, major complications and 90-day mortality and is associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and longer operation time. The impact on long-term survival and recurrence should be studied in RCTs including robotic MIPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas A Uijterwijk
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Kongyuan Wei
- Faculty of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Meidai Kasai
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Benedetto Ielpo
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jony van Hilst
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Palanivelu Chinnusamy
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Center, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Daniel H L Lemmers
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fernando Burdio
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Palanisamy Senthilnathan
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Center, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Renyi Qin
- Faculty of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Takagi K, Umeda Y, Yoshida R, Fuji T, Yasui K, Yagi T, Fujiwara T. Innovative suture technique for robotic hepaticojejunostomy: double-layer interrupted sutures. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:284. [PMID: 37468703 PMCID: PMC10356881 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03020-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Biliary reconstruction remains a technically demanding and complicated procedure in minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary surgeries. No optimal hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) technique has been demonstrated to be superior for preventing biliary complications. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of our unique technique of posterior double-layer interrupted sutures in robotic HJ. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. Forty-two patients who underwent robotic pancreatoduodenectomy using this technique between September 2020 and November 2022 at our center were reviewed. In the posterior double-layer interrupted technique, sutures were placed to bite the bile duct, posterior seromuscular layer of the jejunum, and full thickness of the jejunum. RESULTS The median operative time was 410 (interquartile range [IQR], 388-478) min, and the median HJ time was 30 (IQR, 28-39) min. The median bile duct diameter was 7 (IQR, 6-10) mm. Of the 42 patients, one patient (2.4%) had grade B bile leakage. During the median follow-up of 12.6 months, one patient (2.4%) with bile leakage developed anastomotic stenosis. Perioperative mortality was not observed. A surgical video showing the posterior double-layer interrupted sutures in the robotic HJ is included. CONCLUSIONS Posterior double-layer interrupted sutures in robotic HJ provided a simple and feasible method for biliary reconstruction with a low risk of biliary complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosei Takagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Yuzo Umeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Fuji
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kazuya Yasui
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Takahito Yagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li L, Bo Z, Liu Q, Wang G, Zhang W, Liang Q. Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy between laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e33588. [PMID: 37083770 PMCID: PMC10118311 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000033588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a technically demanding procedure but is gradually gaining acceptance in clinical practice. This study was performed to compare the short-term outcomes of LPD with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). The perioperative data of the patients who underwent LPD (n = 25) and OPD (n = 40) from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 at Zhangjiagang Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University were collected and retrospectively analyzed. All patients received R0 resection, and none of the patients died within the perioperative period. The preoperative data (gender, age, body mass index [BMI], and preoperative bilirubin), the intraoperative data (operative time, number of retrieved lymph nodes), and postoperative data (level 1 monitoring time, postoperative fluid diet time, postoperative fluid feeding time, and hospitalization cost) were comparable between the 2 groups (P > .05). The estimated blood loss, abdominal drainage tube removal time, postoperative hospital stay, catheter removal time, and analgesic drug use were significantly lesser in the LPD group, when compared to the OPD group (P < .05). LPD is safe and feasible. Compared to OPD, LPD has less surgical trauma, less intraoperative bleeding, and faster postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linyang Li
- The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, China
| | - Zhang Bo
- The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, China
| | - Qiuhua Liu
- The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, China
| | - Gang Wang
- The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, China
| | - Wangji Zhang
- The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, China
| | - Qinyu Liang
- The Affiliated Zhangjiagang Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou City, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lau WY. Current controversies and challenges for resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in pancreatic head aiming at cure. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2023; 22:111-112. [PMID: 36450619 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wan Yee Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chierici A, Castaldi A, El Zibawi M, Rosso E, Iannelli A. How to deal with right hepatic artery coming from the superior mesenteric artery during minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2023; 22:121-127. [PMID: 36604294 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anatomical variations in the liver arterial supply are quite common and can affect the surgical strategy when performing a minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD). Their presence must be preemptively detected to avoid postoperative liver and biliary complications. DATA SOURCES Following the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane protocol we conducted a systematic review on the management of an accessory or replaced right hepatic artery (RHA) arising from the superior mesenteric artery when performing an MIPD. RESULTS Five studies involving 118 patients were included. The most common reported management of the aberrant RHA was conservative (97.0%); however, patients undergoing aberrant RHA division without reconstruction did not develop liver or biliary complications. No differences in postoperative morbidity or long-term oncological related overall survival were reported in all the included studies when comparing MIPD in patients with standard anatomy to those with aberrant RHA. CONCLUSIONS MIPD in patients with aberrant RHA is feasible without increase in morbidity and mortality. As preoperative strategy is crucial, we suggested planning an MIPD with an anomalous RHA focusing on preoperative vascular aberrancy assessment and different strategies to reduce the risk of liver ischemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Chierici
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Hospitalier d'Antibes Juan-les-Pins, Antibes, France.
| | - Antonio Castaldi
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Center of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Mohamed El Zibawi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Center of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Antonio Iannelli
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Center of Nice, Nice, France; Faculty of Medicine, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Inserm, U1065, Team 8 'Hepatic Complications of Obesity and Alcohol', Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mederos MA, Starr S, Park JY, King JC, Tomlinson JS, Hines OJ, Donahue TR, Girgis MD. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:301-310. [PMID: 36529625 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is complex procedure with high morbidity in the elderly. This retrospective study aimed to compare post-operative outcomes in patients ≥75 years of age who underwent robot-assisted (RA)PD and open PD. METHODS We analyzed 2502 patients ≥75 years of age who underwent PD from 2015 to 2018 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. RAPD and open PD patients were propensity score matched 1:5 to assess the 30-day outcomes of interest: postoperative complications, length of stay, discharge destination, and readmissions. RESULTS Of 725 matched patients, 110 underwent RAPD, 615 OPD, and 12 were converted to an open operation. Post-operative outcomes were largely similar between cohorts. RAPD was associated a shorter length of stay (median 8 days, interquartile range [IQR] 6 to 11) than OPD (median 8 days, IQR 7 to 13) (p = 0.003). However, RAPD was associated with more readmissions (28.1% vs. 17.7%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS RAPD in patients ≥75 years of age appears to be safe and has a similar complication profile to open PD. Randomized or well-designed prospective matched studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Mederos
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Savannah Starr
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joon Y Park
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan C King
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Division of Surgical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James S Tomlinson
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Division of Surgical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Surgical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - O J Hines
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Division of Surgical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Timothy R Donahue
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Division of Surgical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark D Girgis
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Division of Surgical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Surgical Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Karadza E, Haney CM, Limen EF, Müller PC, Kowalewski KF, Sandini M, Wennberg E, Schmidt MW, Felinska EA, Lang F, Salg G, Kenngott HG, Rangelova E, Mieog S, Vissers F, Korrel M, Zwart M, Sauvanet A, Loos M, Mehrabi A, de Santibanes M, Shrikhande SV, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG, Müller-Stich BP, Hackert T, Nickel F. Development of biotissue training models for anastomotic suturing in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2023:S1365-182X(23)00041-2. [PMID: 36828741 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic suturing is the Achilles heel of pancreatic surgery. Especially in laparoscopic and robotically assisted surgery, the pancreatic anastomosis should first be trained outside the operating room. Realistic training models are therefore needed. METHODS Models of the pancreas, small bowel, stomach, bile duct, and a realistic training torso were developed for training of anastomoses in pancreatic surgery. Pancreas models with soft and hard textures, small and large ducts were incrementally developed and evaluated. Experienced pancreatic surgeons (n = 44) evaluated haptic realism, rigidity, fragility of tissues, and realism of suturing and knot tying. RESULTS In the iterative development process the pancreas models showed high haptic realism and highest realism in suturing (4.6 ± 0.7 and 4.9 ± 0.5 on 1-5 Likert scale, soft pancreas). The small bowel model showed highest haptic realism (4.8 ± 0.4) and optimal wall thickness (0.1 ± 0.4 on -2 to +2 Likert scale) and suturing behavior (0.1 ± 0.4). The bile duct models showed optimal wall thickness (0.3 ± 0.8 and 0.4 ± 0.8 on -2 to +2 Likert scale) and optimal tissue fragility (0 ± 0.9 and 0.3 ± 0.7). CONCLUSION The biotissue training models showed high haptic realism and realistic suturing behavior. They are suitable for realistic training of anastomoses in pancreatic surgery which may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emir Karadza
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caelan M Haney
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eldridge F Limen
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip C Müller
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of Urology and Urooncological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marta Sandini
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Erica Wennberg
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mona W Schmidt
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Eleni A Felinska
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Franziska Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gabriel Salg
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hannes G Kenngott
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elena Rangelova
- Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery at Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sven Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frederique Vissers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten Korrel
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maurice Zwart
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of HPB Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy-Paris, France
| | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin de Santibanes
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Instituto Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Topal H, Jaekers J, Geers J, Topal B. Prospective cohort study on short-term outcomes of 3D-laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with stented pancreaticogastrostomy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:1203-1212. [PMID: 36163561 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09609-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy, either laparoscopic or robotic, is a high-risk procedure with demanding learning curve. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate short-term clinical and oncologic outcomes of 3D-laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (3dLPD) with stented pancreaticogastrostomy (sPG) and Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy (ryGES). METHODS Between March 2016 and July 2021, 347 consecutive patients underwent 3dLPD for confirmed or suspected pancreatic or periampullary tumors. Pancreatic duct diameter measured 3 mm or less in 221 (64%) and pancreatic texture was soft in 191 (55%) patients. Simultaneous resection of the superior mesenteric or portal vein was performed in 52 (15%) patients. RESULTS Postoperative complications were observed in 189 (54%) patients, with severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade > 2) in 68 (20%) including 4 (1.2%) deaths. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (cPOPF) occurred in 88 (25%), hemorrhage in 25 (7%), and bile leakage in 10 (3%) patients. Clinical pancreatic fistula was strongly associated with soft pancreatic texture and small pancreatic duct diameter (p < 0.001) and managed by endoscopic trans-gastric drainage in 34 (38.6%) patients, reoperation in 12 (13.6%), and ICU admission in 11 (12.5%). The remaining 31 (35%) patients with cPOPF were managed without invasive intervention. Median length of hospital stay after surgery was 13 (range 5-112; IQR 8-18) days. In pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) the R0-resection rate was 66/186 (36%), R1-indirect 95/186 (51%), and R1-direct 25 (13%). Median number of locoregional lymph nodes retrieved in PDAC was 21 (IQR 15-28). R0-resection rate for malignancy other than PDAC was 78/86 (91%) with a median of 16 (IQR 12-22) locoregional lymph nodes retrieved. CONCLUSION 3dLPD with sPG and ryGES is associated with 1.2% mortality and 25% cPOPF. About two-third of patients with cPOPF were managed with some type of invasive intervention, whereas the intraoperatively placed drains sufficed in one-third of patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02671357.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halit Topal
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Jaekers
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joachim Geers
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Baki Topal
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Olakowski M, Jabłońska B, Mrowiec S. A chronicle of the pancreatoduodenectomy technique development - from the surgeon's hand to the robotic arm. Acta Chir Belg 2023; 123:94-101. [PMID: 36250406 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2022.2135251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains one of the most challenging abdominal surgical procedures. METHODS A review of the literature regarding the history of PD, starting from the pioneers, Walter Kausch and Alan Whipple, through the great surgeons of the last century, up to the present day. RESULTS The greatest development of the PD technique took place at the end of the twentieth century. Over the last 40 years, there have been huge technological advances in medicine, which have resulted in the introduction of laparoscopic and robotic techniques for abdominal surgery. However, it turns out that PD is still performed as it used to be "by the surgeon's hand" via laparotomy rather than using the most modern robot or laparoscope and is currently recommended by experts for treatment of pancreatic head cancer (PHC). This is mainly caused by not many data comparing these three PD methods. Moreover, increasingly the results achieved by surgeons advanced in minimally invasive pancreatic resections are comparable to or even better than those achieved by the open method in reference centres. Robot-assisted PD appears to be gaining an advantage over laparoscopic technique in the efficacy of PHC treatment. The obstacles most inhibiting the use of surgical robotics are the high cost of the device and procedure, and the long learning curve. A bright future lies ahead for both methods, with the robotic technique in the forefront. CONCLUSIONS Despite significant advances in access and surgical technique, PD remains a challenging surgical procedure requiring a big surgeon's experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Olakowski
- Department of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Beata Jabłońska
- Department of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Sławomir Mrowiec
- Department of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yan Y, Hua Y, Chang C, Zhu X, Sha Y, Wang B. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumor: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1093395. [PMID: 36761416 PMCID: PMC9905842 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1093395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This meta-analysis compares the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) to those of open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) for pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Background LPD has been increasingly applied in the treatment of pancreatic and periampullary tumors. However, the perioperative outcomes of LPD versus OPD are still controversial. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized comparative trials (NRCTs) comparing LPD versus OPD for pancreatic and periampullary tumors. The main outcomes were mortality, morbidity, serious complications, and hospital stay. The secondary outcomes were operative time, blood loss, transfusion, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), bile leak (BL), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), lymph nodes harvested, R0 resection, reoperation, and readmission. RCTs were evaluated by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. NRCTs were assessed using a modified tool from the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies. Data were pooled as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD). This study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022338832). Results Four RCTs and 35 NRCTs concerning a total of 40,230 patients (4,262 LPD and 35,968 OPD) were included. Meta-analyses showed no significant differences in mortality (OR 0.91, p = 0.35), serious complications (OR 0.97, p = 0.74), POPF (OR 0.93, p = 0.29), PPH (OR 1.10, p = 0.42), BL (OR 1.28, p = 0.22), harvested lymph nodes (MD 0.66, p = 0.09), reoperation (OR 1.10, p = 0.41), and readmission (OR 0.95, p = 0.46) between LPD and OPD. Operative time was significantly longer for LPD (MD 85.59 min, p < 0.00001), whereas overall morbidity (OR 0.80, p < 0.00001), hospital stay (MD -2.32 days, p < 0.00001), blood loss (MD -173.84 ml, p < 0.00001), transfusion (OR 0.62, p = 0.0002), and DGE (OR 0.78, p = 0.002) were reduced for LPD. The R0 rate was higher for LPD (OR 1.25, p = 0.001). Conclusions LPD is associated with non-inferior short-term surgical outcomes and oncologic adequacy compared to OPD when performed by experienced surgeons at large centers. LPD may result in reduced overall morbidity, blood loss, transfusion, and DGE, but longer operative time. Further RCTs should address the potential advantages of LPD over OPD. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022338832.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yinggang Hua
- Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cheng Chang
- Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuanjin Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanhua Sha
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bailin Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rocca A, Porfidia C, Russo R, Tamburrino A, Avella P, Vaschetti R, Bianco P, Calise F. Neuraxial anesthesia in hepato-pancreatic-bilio surgery: a first western pilot study of 46 patients. Updates Surg 2023; 75:481-491. [PMID: 36607598 PMCID: PMC9817460 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01437-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The most common anesthetic approach in hepato-pancreatic-biliary (HPB) surgery is general anesthesia (GA), but it may result in increased morbidity and mortality and peri-operative risks especially in frail patients. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of neuraxial anesthesia (NA) in HPB in a pilot clinical series. This analysis was conducted on 46 consecutive patients undergoing HPB surgery in an Italian Tertial referral center. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA), combined spino-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and peridural anesthesia (PA) were used in major and minor hepatectomies and bilio-pancreatic surgery instead of GA. NA was evaluated by analyzing the surgical and anesthesiological short-term outcomes. 46 patients were considered eligible for the study between February 2018 and May 2020. The average age was 69.07 (± 9.95) years. 22 were males and 24 were females. According to the ASA score, 19 (41.30%) patients had ASA II, 22 (47.83%) had ASA III and 5 (10.87%) had ASA IV. 22 (47.83%) patients underwent CSA, 20 (43.48%) CSEA and 4 (8.69%) PA. We performed 8 major and 19 minor hepatectomies, 7 bilio-digestive derivations, 5 Whipple procedures, 4 iatrogenic biliary duct injuries, 2 splenopancreatectomies and 1 hepatic cyst fenestration. Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 was observed in 3 patients. The conversion rate to endotracheal intubation occurring in 3 of 46 (6.52%) patients. After surgery, no local or pulmonary complications and delirium were reported in our series. The present study demonstrates that NA is a safe and feasible option in selected patients, if performed in referral centers by well-trained anaesthesiologists and surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- HPB Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy.
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, CB, Italy.
| | - Carmela Porfidia
- Intensive Care Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy
| | - Raffaele Russo
- Intensive Care Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy
| | | | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, CB, Italy
| | - Roberto Vaschetti
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, CB, Italy
| | - Paolo Bianco
- HPB Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy
| | - Fulvio Calise
- HPB Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030, Castel Volturno, CE, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, CB, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: trends in technique and training challenges. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:266-273. [PMID: 35927351 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09469-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND More complex cases are being performed robotically. This study aims to characterize trends in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) over time and assess opportunities for advanced trainees. METHODS Using the ACS-NSQIP database from 2014 to 2019, PD cases were characterized by operative approach (open-OPN, laparoscopic-LAP, robotic-ROB). Proficiency and postoperative outcomes were described by approach over time. RESULTS 24,268 PDs were identified, with the ROB approach increasing from 2.8% to 7.5%. Unplanned conversion increased over time for LAP (27.7-39.0%, p = 0.003) but was unchanged for ROB cases (14.8-14.7%, p = 0.257). Morbidity increased for OPN PD (35.5-36.8%, p = 0.041) and decreased for ROB PD (38.7-30.3%, p = 0.010). Mean LOS was lower in ROB than LAP/OPN (9.5 vs. 10.9 vs. 10.9 days, p < 0.00001). Approximately, 100 AHPBA, SSO, and ASTS fellows are being trained each year in North America; however, only about 5 RPDs are available per trainee per year which is far below that recommended to achieve proficiency. CONCLUSION Over a 6-year period, a significant increase was observed in the use of RPD without a concomitant increase in conversion rates. RPD was associated with decreased morbidity and length of stay. Despite this shift, the number of cases being performed is not adequate for all fellows to achieve proficiency before graduation.
Collapse
|
29
|
Olakowski M, Grudzińska E. Pancreatic head cancer - Current surgery techniques. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:73-81. [PMID: 35680512 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.05.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic head cancer is a highly fatal disease. For now, surgery offers the only potential long-term cure albeit with a high risk of complications. However, the progress of surgical technique during the past decade has resulted in 5-year survival approaching 30% after resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. This paper presents current data on the recommended extent of lymphadenectomy, the resection margin, on the definition of resectable and borderline resectable tumors and mesopancreas. Surgical techniques proposed to improve PD are presented: the artery first approach, the uncinate process first, the mesopancreas first approach, the triangle operation, periarterial divestment, and multiorgan resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Olakowski
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, 40-752, Katowice, Poland
| | - Ewa Grudzińska
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, 40-752, Katowice, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Khiem T, Hoi H, Hiep T, Khue K, Duy V, Inoue Y, Son H, Dung D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with left posterior superior mesenteric artery first-approach and plexus-preserving circumferential lymphadenectomy: step-by-step technique with a surgical case report (with video). World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:269. [PMID: 36028841 PMCID: PMC9419321 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02730-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (tLPD) for cancer of the Vater remains a challenging procedure. Recently, several meta-analyses showed the superior aspects of “superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-first approach,” “systematic mesopancreas dissection,” and “circumferential lymphadenectomy around SMA” in increasing R0 resection rate and reducing postoperative complications including pancreatic fistula and bleeding as well as improving overall survival particularly. Case presentation Our patient is a 70-year-old female with a no special medical history, recruited because of jaundice. She was referred for pancreaticoduodenectomy because of a 10-mm-sized mass in distal bile duct referred to as Vater’s tumor. We used 5 trocars, and the patient was placed in a Trendelenburg position. The transverse colon was lifted, the first loop of the jejunum was pulled to the left, and lymph node groups 14th and 15th were removed en bloc and then exposed the SMA from the anterior to the left posterior side from the caudal side to the origin. The first jejunal vessels and the posterior inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery were ligated as well as the extensive mobility of the duodenum and head of the pancreas from the left side. The systematic mesopancreas dissection from the right site of the SMA will be easily and conveniently done afterwards. Histopathological examination of ypT2N1 indicated that 1 of the 22 lymph nodes was positive, which was 1 of 7 LN no. 14. Pathological results showed a Vater adenocarcinoma with all margins being negative. Conclusions This technique was safe and effective to perform precise level 2 mesopancreas dissection and complete lymphadenectomy around SMA without dissection of pl-SMA in laparoscopic field. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02730-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanh Khiem
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Ham Hoi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Tuan Hiep
- Department of Surgery, Hanoi Medical University, 1st Ton That Tung Street, Dong Da, Ha Noi, 11521, Vietnam.
| | - Kim Khue
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Van Duy
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Hong Son
- Department of Oncology, Viet Duc University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Duc Dung
- Department of Surgery, Thai Binh Medical University, Thai Binh, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Borie F, Pichy C, Nayeri M, Fall S. Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2022; 32:1048-1055. [PMID: 35833839 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The role of laparoscopy during a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is not clearly defined. The purpose of this study was thus to compare the cost-effectiveness between laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). Materials and Methods: From 2010 to 2019, 140 patients underwent PD (60 LPD and 80 OPD). After 60-60 matching, the clinical-pathological characteristics, surgical technique, and type of rehabilitation were identical in both groups. Complications, R0 resection, and cost were compared. Results: Complication rates were 48% (12% Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4) in the LPD group and 64% (22% Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4) in the OPD group. The LPD group had significantly fewer pulmonary complications (6%) than the OPD group (20%) (P = .04). The oncological quality of the R0 resection did not differ between the two groups. The operating time was 312 ± 50 minutes in the OPD group and 392 ± 75 minutes in the LPD group (P < .001). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for the LPD group (13 ± 10) days compared to the OPD group (19 ± 8) days (P = .02). The average cost of total hospital stay was significantly lower for the LPD group compared to the OPD group (P = .02). Conclusions: Despite longer operative times, LPD had fewer (pulmonary) complications and reduced hospital costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederic Borie
- Department of Digestive surgery, CHU Carémeau, Place du Pr Debré, Nîmes, France.,Research Unit INSERM University of Montpellier, IDESP Institute Desbrest of Epidemiology and Public Health, Montpellier, France
| | - Célia Pichy
- Department of Digestive surgery, CHU Carémeau, Place du Pr Debré, Nîmes, France
| | - Mihane Nayeri
- Department of Digestive surgery, CHU Carémeau, Place du Pr Debré, Nîmes, France
| | - Seïla Fall
- Department of Digestive surgery, CHU Carémeau, Place du Pr Debré, Nîmes, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Di Franco G, Lorenzoni V, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Guadagni S, Gianardi D, Bianchini M, Pollina LE, Melfi F, Mamone D, Milli C, Di Candio G, Turchetti G, Morelli L. Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy with the da Vinci Xi: can the costs of advanced technology be offset by clinical advantages? A case-matched cost analysis versus open approach. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:4417-4428. [PMID: 34708294 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08793-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has shown some advantages over open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) but few studies have reported a cost analysis between the two techniques. We conducted a structured cost-analysis comparing pancreatoduodenectomy performed with the use of the da Vinci Xi, and the traditional open approach, and considering healthcare direct costs associated with the intervention and the short-term post-operative course. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty RPD and 194 OPD performed between January 2011 and December 2020 by the same operator at our high-volume multidisciplinary center for robot-assisted surgery and for pancreatic surgery, were retrospectively analyzed. Two comparable groups of 20 patients (Xi-RPD-group) and 40 patients (OPD-group) were obtained matching 1:2 the RPD-group with the OPD-group. Perioperative data and overall costs, including overall variable costs (OVCs) and fixed costs, were compared. RESULTS No difference was reported in mean operative time: 428 min for Xi-RPD-group versus 404 min for OPD, p = 0.212. The median overall length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the Xi-RPD-group: 10 days versus 16 days, p = 0.001. In the Xi-RPD-group, consumable costs were significantly higher (€6149.2 versus €1267.4, p < 0.001), while hospital stay costs were significantly lower: €5231.6 versus €8180 (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found in terms of OVCs: €13,483.4 in Xi-RPD-group versus €11,879.8 in OPD-group (p = 0.076). CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted surgery is more expensive because of higher acquisition and maintenance costs. However, although RPD is associated to higher material costs, the advantages of the robotic system associated to lower hospital stay costs and the absence of difference in terms of personnel costs thanks to the similar operative time with respect to OPD, make the OVCs of the two techniques no longer different. Hence, the higher costs of advanced technology can be partially compensated by clinical advantages, particularly within a high-volume multidisciplinary center for both robot-assisted and pancreatic surgery. These preliminary data need confirmation by further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregorio Di Franco
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.,Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Palmeri
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.,Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Niccolò Furbetta
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.,Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Simone Guadagni
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.,Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Desirée Gianardi
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.,Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matteo Bianchini
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.,Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Franca Melfi
- Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Domenica Mamone
- Pharmaceutical Unit: Medical Device Management, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlo Milli
- Board of Directors, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giulio Di Candio
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.,Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy. .,Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. .,EndoCAS (Center for Computer Assisted Surgery), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dong H, Luo M, Ke S, Zhan J, Liu X, Li Z. Application of intraoperative navigation in 3D laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case report. Exp Ther Med 2022; 24:452. [PMID: 35720632 PMCID: PMC9199071 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is one of the most challenging operations in abdominal surgery, with a high risk and numerous potential complications. Laparoscopy can magnify the surgical field, improving vision, but it cannot see through and identify the internal structures of the surgical field. Intraoperative navigation is a technology currently being developed; it projects the three-dimensional (3D) image established before surgery onto the surgical area during surgery, locates the anatomical landmarks, matches the 3D image with the actual image, and then displays the relationship between the tumor and the surrounding blood vessels. The important structures such as tumors, blood vessels, bile ducts and pancreatic ducts are quickly identified. Secondary injuries are reduced, the operation speed is increased and the surgical safety is improved. The present study describes the use of surgical navigation technology in the 3D laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy of a 64-year-old man. The present paper reports the treatment process of the case, the application of surgical navigation technology in the operation and discusses the advantages of surgical navigation technology in 3D laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanzhang Dong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Kanghua Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong 523080, P.R. China
| | - Mingjian Luo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Kanghua Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong 523080, P.R. China
| | - Shaobiao Ke
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Kanghua Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong 523080, P.R. China
| | - Jiulin Zhan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Kanghua Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong 523080, P.R. China
| | - Xi Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Kanghua Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong 523080, P.R. China
| | - Zhiwei Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Kanghua Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong 523080, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Opoku D, Hart A, Thompson DT, Tran C, Suraju MF, Chang J, Boatman S, Troester A, Goffredo P, Hassan I. Equivalency of short-term perioperative outcomes after open, laparoscopic and robotic ileal anal pouch anastomosis. Does procedure complexity override operative approach? Surg Open Sci 2022; 9:86-90. [PMID: 35719413 PMCID: PMC9201005 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Ileal pouch anal anastomosis is the treatment of choice for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis undergoing a proctocolectomy and desiring bowel continuity. It is a technically complex operation associated with significant morbidity and may be performed by an open, laparoscopic, or robotic approach. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the comparative perioperative outcomes between these 3 techniques outside of institutional studies. Methods The NSQIP targeted proctectomy data set was used to identify patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, and robotic ileal pouch anal anastomosis between 2016 and 2019. Thirty-day outcomes between different surgical approaches were compared using univariate and multivariable analysis. Results During the study period, 1,067 open, 971 laparoscopic, and 341 robotic ileal pouch anal anastomosis were performed. The most frequent indications were inflammatory bowel disease (64%), malignancy (18%), and familial adenomatous polyposis (7%). Mean age of the cohort was 43 ± 15 years with 43% female and 76% with body mass index ≤ 30 kg/m2. Overall morbidity was 26.8% for the entire cohort with 4% anastomotic leak, 6% reoperation, 21% ileus, and 21% readmission rate. After adjusting for available confounders, operative approach was not associated with better short-term outcomes, including length of stay, overall morbidity, anastomotic leak, reoperation, incidence of ileus, and 30-day readmissions. Conclusion Ileal pouch anal anastomosis continues to be associated with significant postoperative morbidity regardless of operative approach. Patient-related advantages in terms of perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic platforms compared to open surgery are less pronounced in complex operations such as ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Ileal anal pouch anastomosis is a technically complex operation associated with significant postoperative 30-day morbidity. Postoperative morbidity is similar between open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. In complex operations such as ileal anal pouch anastomosis, the short-term perioperative advantages of minimally invasive approaches may not be clinically evident.
Collapse
|
35
|
Benzing C, Timmermann L, Winklmann T, Haiden LM, Hillebrandt KH, Winter A, Maurer MM, Felsenstein M, Krenzien F, Schmelzle M, Pratschke J, Malinka T. Robotic versus open pancreatic surgery: a propensity score-matched cost-effectiveness analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1923-1933. [PMID: 35312854 PMCID: PMC9399018 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02471-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Robotic pancreatic surgery (RPS) is associated with high intraoperative costs compared to open pancreatic surgery (OPS). However, it remains unclear whether several advantages of RPS such as reduced surgical trauma and a shorter postoperative recovery time could lead to a reduction in total costs outweighing the intraoperative costs. The study aimed to compare patients undergoing OPS and RPS with regards to cost-effectiveness in a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Methods Patients undergoing OPS and RPS between 2017 and 2019 were included in this monocentric, retrospective analysis. The controlling department provided financial data (costs and revenues, net loss/profit). A propensity score-matched analysis was performed or OPS and RPS (matching criteria: age, American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) score, gender, body mass index (BMI), and type of pancreatic resection) with a caliper 0.2. Results In total, 272 eligible OPS cases were identified, of which 252 met all inclusion criteria and were thus included in the further analysis. The RPS group contained 92 patients. The matched cohorts contained 41 patients in each group. Length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly shorter in the RPS group (12 vs. 19 days, p = 0.003). Major postoperative morbidity (Dindo/Clavien ≥ 3a) and 90-day mortality did not differ significantly between OPS and RPS (p > 0.05). Intraoperative costs were significantly higher in the RPS group than in the OPS group (7334€ vs. 5115€, p < 0.001). This was, however, balanced by other financial categories. The overall cost-effectiveness tended to be better when comparing RPS to OPS (net profit—RPS: 57€ vs. OPS: − 2894€, p = 0.328). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed major postoperative complications, longer hospital stay, and ASA scores < 3 were linked to the risk of net loss (i.e., costs > revenue). Conclusions Surgical outcomes of RPS were similar to those of OPS. Higher intraoperative costs of RPS are outweighed by advantages in other categories of cost-effectiveness such as decreased lengths of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Benzing
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Lea Timmermann
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Winklmann
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lena Marie Haiden
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karl Herbert Hillebrandt
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Axel Winter
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Magnus Maurer
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthäus Felsenstein
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Malinka
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wei K, Hackert T. Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081971. [PMID: 33923884 PMCID: PMC8074119 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Surgery is the only potential cure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and should always be combined with adjuvant chemotherapy or other multimodal treatment. Besides the advances in such multimodal approaches, there has been substantial progress in surgical techniques to especially address advanced resections. These techniques include specific operative steps, such as ‘artery first’ or ‘uncinate first’ approaches as well as techniques that allow safe vascular resection and reconstruction to achieve radical tumor removal. Most recently, also minimally-invasive and robotic approaches have been adopted for pancreatic cancer surgery; however, there is no high-level evidence on these evolving techniques especially with regards to long-term results compared to conventional surgical techniques. Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents an aggressive tumor of the digestive system with still low five-year survival of less than 10%. Although there are improvements for multimodal therapy of PDAC, surgery still remains the effective way to treat the disease. Combined with adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant treatment, pancreatic surgery is able to enhance the five-year survival up to around 20%. However, pancreatic resection is always associated with a high risk of complications and regarded as one of the most complex fields in abdominal surgery. This review gives a summary on the surgical treatment for PDAC based on the current literature with a special focus on resection techniques.
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents an aggressive tumor of the digestive system with still low five-year survival of less than 10%. Although there are improvements for multimodal therapy of PDAC, surgery still remains the effective way to treat the disease. Combined with adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant treatment, pancreatic surgery is able to enhance the five-year survival up to around 20%. However, pancreatic resection is always associated with a high risk of complications and regarded as one of the most complex fields in abdominal surgery. This review gives a summary on the surgical treatment for PDAC based on the current literature with a special focus on resection techniques.
Collapse
|
38
|
Proposed training pathway with initial experience to set up robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic service. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:65-71. [PMID: 33575862 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01207-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Although robot-assisted hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgery has gained momentum over the last 2 decades, only a handful of units in the world perform major robotic resections. Adaptation of robotic surgery in the UK lags behind its European counterparts and this is mainly because of cost implications in a publicly funded National Health Service (NHS). We describe our experience of setting up a robotic HPB programme with clinical outcomes and propose a training pathway that would help prospective centres in setting up their own robotic HPB service with robust clinical governance oversight. After gaining colleagues' and departmental support, approval from the hospital clinical governance, finance department and new intervention procedure committee was sought. A team of two consultant surgeons, three assistants and three theatre staff went through a structured training programme sponsored mainly by the industry. Surgeon training consisted of online modules, simulation, wet lab, cadaveric training, case observations, proctored procedures followed by independent practice. All major cases were recorded and videos reviewed to improve performance. A total of 111 procedures were successfully completed with robotic assistance between April 2018 and March 2020. The programme started with robot-assisted cholecystectomy as index procedure and progressed on to more complex liver and pancreatic resections including major hepatectomy and Whipple's procedure. The training pathway followed by our team has been effective in setting up a safe robotic HPB programme and could be considered as a roadmap to start new Robotic HPB services.
Collapse
|