1
|
Rowles WM, Hsu WY, McPolin K, Li A, Merrill S, Guo CY, Green AJ, Gelfand JM, Bove RM. Transitioning From S1P Receptor Modulators to B Cell-Depleting Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical, Radiographic, and Laboratory Data. NEUROLOGY(R) NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2022; 9:e1183. [PMID: 35581005 PMCID: PMC9128034 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000001183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) transition from oral sphingosine-1-receptor (S1P) modulators to anti-CD20 therapies for several circumstances. Optimal timing of this transition is uncertain, given competing concerns of rebound disease activity and ensuring immune reconstitution. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between inflammatory activity and the transition period from fingolimod to anti-CD20 therapies in a real-world MS cohort. METHODS Medical records were reviewed for all patients at our center transitioning from fingolimod to rituximab or ocrelizumab between 2010 and October 2020. Time periods reviewed were the following: before fingolimod discontinuation, interval between fingolimod and anti-CD20 treatments, and after the first anti-CD20 infusion. The primary outcome was clinical relapses; MRI activity, time to absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery, and infections were secondary. Clinical and demographic factors significant in univariable analyses were included in multivariable analyses. RESULTS Transition data were available for 108 patients (68.5% women, 68.5% relapsing-remitting MS, mean age 44.6 years). The median (interquartile range) interval between fingolimod and anti-CD20 therapy was 28 (1-115.2) days. Six of 51 patients (11.8%) with intervals >1 month and 0/57 patients with shorter intervals experienced a relapse (MRI confirmed) within 6 months of fingolimod discontinuation. In the year following anti-CD20 initiation, 4/108 patients (3.7%) experienced a relapse (median 214.5 days after infusion). An additional 7% of those undergoing contrast-enhanced MRIs developed Gd+ lesions. ALC normalized following treatment switch in 89/92; the interval between treatments was unrelated to ALC recovery or infection. DISCUSSION Delaying anti-CD20 start to monitor ALC after S1P modulator discontinuation may not be necessary and could increase rebound risk. ALC monitoring could instead occur after a rapid switch to anti-CD20 treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M. Rowles
- From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (W.M.R., W.-Y.H., K.M., A.L., C.-Y.G., A.J.G., J.M.G., R.M.B.), Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Pharmacy (S.M.), and UCSF Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Wan-Yu Hsu
- From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (W.M.R., W.-Y.H., K.M., A.L., C.-Y.G., A.J.G., J.M.G., R.M.B.), Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Pharmacy (S.M.), and UCSF Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Kira McPolin
- From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (W.M.R., W.-Y.H., K.M., A.L., C.-Y.G., A.J.G., J.M.G., R.M.B.), Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Pharmacy (S.M.), and UCSF Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Alyssa Li
- From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (W.M.R., W.-Y.H., K.M., A.L., C.-Y.G., A.J.G., J.M.G., R.M.B.), Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Pharmacy (S.M.), and UCSF Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Steven Merrill
- From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (W.M.R., W.-Y.H., K.M., A.L., C.-Y.G., A.J.G., J.M.G., R.M.B.), Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Pharmacy (S.M.), and UCSF Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Chu-Yueh Guo
- From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (W.M.R., W.-Y.H., K.M., A.L., C.-Y.G., A.J.G., J.M.G., R.M.B.), Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Pharmacy (S.M.), and UCSF Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Ari J. Green
- From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (W.M.R., W.-Y.H., K.M., A.L., C.-Y.G., A.J.G., J.M.G., R.M.B.), Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Pharmacy (S.M.), and UCSF Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jeffrey Marc Gelfand
- From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (W.M.R., W.-Y.H., K.M., A.L., C.-Y.G., A.J.G., J.M.G., R.M.B.), Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Pharmacy (S.M.), and UCSF Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Riley M. Bove
- From the UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (W.M.R., W.-Y.H., K.M., A.L., C.-Y.G., A.J.G., J.M.G., R.M.B.), Division of Neuroimmunology and Glial Biology, Department of Neurology, Department of Clinical Pharmacy (S.M.), and UCSF Department of Ophthalmology (A.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weber MS, Buttmann M, Meuth SG, Dirks P, Muros-Le Rouzic E, Eggebrecht JC, Hieke-Schulz S, Leemhuis J, Ziemssen T. Safety, Adherence and Persistence in a Real-World Cohort of German MS Patients Newly Treated With Ocrelizumab: First Insights From the CONFIDENCE Study. Front Neurol 2022; 13:863105. [PMID: 35614917 PMCID: PMC9126090 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.863105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Real-world relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS) populations may be more diverse than in clinical trials. Here, we present a first analysis of safety, adherence and persistence data from a real-world cohort of patients newly treated with ocrelizumab. Methods CONFIDENCE (ML39632, EUPAS22951) is an ongoing multicenter, non-interventional post authorization safety study assessing patients with RMS or PPMS newly treated with ocrelizumab or other disease-modifying therapies for up to 10 years. For this analysis, patients newly treated with ocrelizumab were analyzed in subgroups by MS phenotype and age over a mean ~1 year of exposure totaling 2,329 patient years [PY]). Results At data cutoff (14 October 2020), 1,702 patients with RMS and 398 patients with PPMS were treated with ≥1 dose of ocrelizumab. At baseline, the mean ages (SD) of patients with RMS and PPMS were 41.59 (11.24) and 50.95 (9.88) years and the mean EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale) was 3.18 (1.87) and 4.41 (1.59), respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs across both phenotypes were infections and infestations, with infection SAE rates of 2.8 events/100 PY and 1.5 events/100 PY in patients with RMS and PPMS, respectively. Across all phenotypes, ocrelizumab persistence was 92% at 24 months; median time between doses was ~6 months. Conclusions The ocrelizumab safety profile observed in the CONFIDENCE real-world MS population was consistent to the one observed in pivotal clinical trials. High treatment persistence and adherence were observed. Trial Registration ML39632, EUPAS22951
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin S Weber
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Neuropathology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Sven G Meuth
- Clinic of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Petra Dirks
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, Carl Gustav Carus University Clinic, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Long-term real-world effectiveness and safety of fingolimod over 5 years in Germany. J Neurol 2022; 269:3276-3285. [PMID: 34982201 PMCID: PMC9120082 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10931-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the 5-year real-world benefit–risk profile of fingolimod in patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) in Germany. Methods Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA) is a non-interventional real-world study to prospectively assess the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in routine clinical practice in Germany. The follow-up period comprised 5 years. Patients were included if they had been diagnosed with RRMS and had been prescribed fingolimod as part of clinical routine. There were no exclusion criteria except the contraindications for fingolimod as defined in the European label. The effectiveness and safety analysis set comprised 4032 and 4067 RRMS patients, respectively. Results At the time of the 5-year follow-up of PANGAEA, 66.57% of patients still continued fingolimod therapy. Annualized relapse rates decreased from baseline 1.5 ± 1.15 to 0.42 ± 0.734 at year 1 and 0.21 ± 0.483 at year 5, and the disability status remained stable, as demonstrated by the Expanded Disability Status Scale mean change from baseline (0.1 ± 2.51), the decrease of the Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score from 5.1 ± 2.59 at baseline to 3.9 ± 2.31 at the 60-months follow-up, and the percentage of patients with ‘no change’ in the Clinical Global Impression scale at the 60-months follow-up (78.11%). Adverse events (AE) occurring in 75.04% of patients were in line with the known safety profile of fingolimod and were mostly non-serious AE (33.62%) and non-serious adverse drug reactions (50.59%; serious AE 4.98%; serious ADR 10.82%). Conclusions PANGAEA demonstrated the sustained beneficial effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in the long-term real-world treatment of patients with RRMS. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10931-w.
Collapse
|
4
|
Scondotto G, Crisafulli S, Antonazzo IC, Virgili G, Trifirò G, Sultana J. Assessing intravitreal anti-VEGF drug safety using real-world data: methodological challenges in observational research. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 21:205-214. [PMID: 34304672 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1957829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is generally acknowledged that the ocular safety profile of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs is acceptable, while the burden of systemic safety of these intravitreal agents is still being debated. The evaluation of the systemic safety of these drugs using real-world data (RWD), such as spontaneous reporting systems (SRS), electronic medical records (EMRs) and claims databases has several advantages, including the capture of outcomes among real-world populations over long observation periods. Nevertheless, there is a relatively small body of research exploring the post-marketing safety of these drugs. AREAS COVERED The aim of this scoping review is to outline and discuss some of the methodological challenges to be faced when investigating the systemic safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs using different sources of RWD. EXPERT OPINION Such challenges include the selection of the most suitable data source, taking into account how well drug utilization is captured and whether the outcomes and covariates of interest can be captured. The strengths and limitations of some analytic methods that can be used to quantify risk, such as the intention-to-treat approach and the as-treated approach, complement each other, and using these together provides a more balanced analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Scondotto
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Salvatore Crisafulli
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Gianni Virgili
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Clinical Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gianluca Trifirò
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Janet Sultana
- Pharmacy Department, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta, Malta.,College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ziemssen T, Albrecht H, Haas J, Klotz L, Lang M, Lassek C, Schmidt S, Ettle B, Schulze-Topphoff U. Descriptive Analysis of Real-World Data on Fingolimod Long-Term Treatment of Young Adult RRMS Patients. Front Neurol 2021; 12:637107. [PMID: 33763018 PMCID: PMC7982917 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.637107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Fingolimod (Gilenya®) is approved for adult and pediatric patients with highly active relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Objectives: The objective was to describe the effectiveness of fingolimod in young adults compared to older patients in clinical practice. Methods: PANGAEA is the largest prospective, multi-center, non-interventional, long-term study evaluating fingolimod in RRMS. We descriptively analyzed demographics, MS characteristics, and severity in two subgroups of young adults (≤20 and >20 to ≤30 years) and older patients (>30 years). Results: Young adults had lower Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores compared to older patients (1.8 and 2.3 vs. 3.2) at baseline. The mean EDSS scores remained stable over 5 years in all subgroups. Young adults had higher annual relapse rates (2.0 and 1.7 vs. 1.4) at study entry, which were reduced by approximately 80% in all subgroups over 5 years. The proportion of patients with no clinical disease activity in year 4 was 52.6 and 73.4 vs. 66.9% in patients ≤20, >20 to ≤30 years and >30 years, respectively. The symbol digit modalities test score increased by 15.25 ± 8.3 and 8.3 ± 11.3 (mean ± SD) from baseline in patients >20 to ≤30 and >30 years. Conclusions: Real-world evidence suggests a long-term treatment benefit of fingolimod in young RRMS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjalf Ziemssen
- Zentrum für klinische Neurowissenschaften, Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Judith Haas
- Zentrum für Multiple Sklerose, Juedisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luisa Klotz
- Klinik für Allgemeine Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Lang
- Nervenärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christoph Lassek
- Neurologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Kassel und Vellmar, Kassel, Germany
| | - Stephan Schmidt
- Neurologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Schmidt, Neudecker, Viebahn & Kronenberger, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barrero F, Mallada-Frechin J, Martínez-Ginés ML, Marzo ME, Meca-Lallana V, Izquierdo G, Ara JR, Oreja-Guevara C, Meca-Lallana J, Forero L, Sánchez-Vera I, Moreno MJ. Spanish real-world experience with fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: MS NEXT study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230846. [PMID: 32240213 PMCID: PMC7117743 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The objective of this study was to characterize the demographic and clinical profile of RRMS patients receiving fingolimod in Spain, and to evaluate drug effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. Methods This observational, retrospective, multicentre, nationwide study was performed at 56 Spanish hospitals and involved 804 RRMS patients who received oral fingolimod (0.5 mg) since November 2011, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Results The mean annualized relapse rate (ARR) in the year before fingolimod was 1.08 and the median EDSS was 3; patients were exposed to fingolimod for 2.2 years as average; regarding magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, more than half of the patients had >20 lesions at baseline. Patients were previously treated with first-line injectable DMTs (60.3%), or natalizumab (31.3%), and 8.3% were naïve patients. Overall, the ARR significantly decreased to 0.28, 0.22 and 0.17 (74.1%, 79.7% and 83.5% of relative reduction, respectively) after 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, P<0.001. The ARR of patients who switched from natalizumab to fingolimod was stable over the study. Most of the patients (88.7%) were free from confirmed disability and MRI activity (67.3%) after 24 months. The persistence after 12 months on fingolimod was 93.9%. Conclusions The subgroups of patients analysed showed differential baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The analysis of patients who received fingolimod in routine clinical practice confirmed adequate efficacy and safety, even for long-term treatment. The present data also confirmed the positive benefit/risk balance with fingolimod in real-world clinical practice setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Barrero
- Neurology Department, Hospital Uniersitario San Cecilio de Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Guillermo Izquierdo
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - José Ramón Ara
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Celia Oreja-Guevara
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Lucía Forero
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ziemssen T, Lang M, Tackenberg B, Schmidt S, Albrecht H, Klotz L, Haas J, Lassek C, Cornelissen C, Ettle B. Long-term real-world evidence for sustained clinical benefits of fingolimod following switch from natalizumab. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 39:101893. [PMID: 31865273 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy limits the duration over which patients can receive natalizumab before requiring a switch to other therapies such as fingolimod. To date, no studies have assessed the long-term real-world effectiveness and safety of fingolimod following a switch from natalizumab. We aimed to investigate the benefit-risk profile of fingolimod over 48 months in patients switching from natalizumab, and the impact of washout duration after natalizumab discontinuation on outcomes during fingolimod treatment. METHODS This analysis used data from PANGAEA, an ongoing German multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, observational study. In total, 3912 patients were included: 530 had switched from natalizumab (natalizumab subpopulation), and a reference population of 3382 had switched from other treatments or were treatment-naïve (non-natalizumab subpopulation). The natalizumab subpopulation was stratified by washout duration (30-89 days, 90-149 days, and ≥ 150 days) prior to fingolimod initiation. RESULTS In the natalizumab subpopulation over 48 months of fingolimod treatment, 58.2% (n = 227/390) of patients remained on fingolimod. Over this period, mean annualized relapse rates (ARRs) and proportions of patients who relapsed were similar across washout durations, and ranged from 0.455 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.363-0.571) to 0.546 (95% CI: 0.446-0.669) and 54.1% (n = 92/170) to 60.2% (n = 127/211), respectively. Overall, 17.1% (n = 36/211) had 6-month confirmed disability worsening. In the non-natalizumab subpopulation, ARR was 0.300, 40.9% (n = 1325/3237) of patients relapsed, and a similar proportion to the natalizumab subpopulation had 6-month disability worsening (16.6% [n = 232/1394]). In both subpopulations, the safety profile of fingolimod was consistent with that observed in randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS In patients discontinuing natalizumab, fingolimod has a favorable benefit-risk profile over 48 months. These findings also suggest using a short washout following natalizumab discontinuation, consistent with guidelines and current clinical practice in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden, D-01307, Germany.
| | - Michael Lang
- NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Björn Tackenberg
- Department of Neurology, Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
| | | | | | - Luisa Klotz
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | - Judith Haas
- Centre for Multiple Sclerosis, Jewish Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Antigen-shift in varicella-zoster virus-specific T-cell immunity over the course of Fingolimod-treatment in relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 38:101859. [PMID: 31855843 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Revised: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fingolimod (FTY) applied as treatment regimen of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) induces downregulation of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors on the lymphocytes. As a result CC chemokine receptor type 7 (CCR7) expressing lymphocytes are retained within the peripheral lymph nodes thus suppressing their accumulation into the cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and hampering disease progress. Unfortunately, MS patients treated with FTY suffer from an increased incidence of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infections which has been associated with a decrease of VZV immediate early 63 (IE63)-specific T-cell immunity. To elucidate VZV-specific T-cell immunity over the course of FTY-treatment, we analyzed T-cell immunity for immediate early, early and late VZV-antigens. METHODS T-cell immune responses were detected via intracellular IFN-γ staining after stimulation with VZV-specific peptide mixes for IE62 and IE63 and recombinant proteins for open reading frame 26 (ORF26), ORF9 and glycoprotein E (gE) using flow cytometry. Analyzed samples comprised of different groups including 18 patients with RRMS at baseline (BL), 6 and 12 months after FTY-treatment start, 12 patients with long-term (LT) FTY-treatment, one FTY-treated patient, before and after VZV-reactivation. In addition, VZV-specific IgG and IgM titers were assessed by ELISA. RESULTS After FTY-treatment start, absolute numbers of CCR7 expressing CD4+ T cells and CD8+T cells dropped rapidly. However, VZV-specific immunity could be detected in the majority of RRMS patients throughout FTY-treatment with increasing prevalence after 6 months of treatment. We found an increase in the prevalence of VZV-specific IFN-γ+CD8+ T-cell immunity in FTY-treated patients after six months of therapy, while in parallel VZV-specific IFN-γ+CD4+ T cells declined dramatically. Additionally, a strong correlation between VZV-specific IgG serum titers and the percentage of RRMS patients with detectable VZV-specific T cells was observed (r = 0.985). Most remarkably, FTY-treated RRMS patients presented a shift in the predominant CD8+ T cell-mediated antigen-response from immediate early (IE62) to early virus antigens (ORF26) six months after treatment in parallel to a decrease of VZV-specific CD4+ T-cell immunity. ORF26-specific CD8+ T cells still dominated the VZV-specific cellular immunity at month 12 after FTY-treatment start and in LT FTY-treated MS patients. In a RRMS patient an increase of VZV-specific CD4+ T cells at VZV-reactivation accompanied with a four-fold increase of a VZV-specific IgG titer was detected which might indicate an important role in cellular immune control of VZV-infections. CONCLUSION Monitoring VZV-specific T-cell immunity might provide a valuable tool to RRMS patient risk management during FTY-treatment.
Collapse
|
9
|
Walczak A, Kurkowska-Jastrzebska I, Zakrzewska-Pniewska B, Dorobek M, Brola W, Zajdel R, Bartosik-Psujek H, Stasiolek M, Kulakowska A, Rusek S, Tutaj A, Glabinski A, Wlodek A, Kochanowski J, Ciach A, Siger M, Kurowska K, Wicha W, Nojszewska M, Podlecka-Pietowska A, Czajka A, Kapica-Topczewska K, Bielecki B, Maciagowska-Terela M, Stepien A. Real-world effectiveness of fingolimod in Polish group of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 184:105453. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Revised: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
10
|
Ziemssen T, Lang M, Tackenberg B, Schmidt S, Albrecht H, Klotz L, Haas J, Lassek C, Couto CAM, Findlay JA, Cornelissen C. Real-world persistence and benefit-risk profile of fingolimod over 36 months in Germany. NEUROLOGY-NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2019; 6:e548. [PMID: 30882022 PMCID: PMC6410931 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000000548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the long-term real-world benefit-risk profile of fingolimod in patients with relapsing MS in Germany. Methods This analysis used data from the noninterventional real-world study, Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA), to assess prospectively the persistence, effectiveness, and safety of fingolimod over 36 months (±90 days) in Germany. For inclusion in the effectiveness analysis (n = 2,537), patients were required to have received fingolimod for the first time in PANGAEA, to have at least 12 months of data, and to have completed each 12-month follow-up period. For the safety analysis (n = 3,266), patients were additionally allowed to have received fingolimod before enrollment. Results At baseline, 94.7% of patients in the effectiveness analysis had received a previous disease-modifying therapy. After 36 months, 70.4% of patients were still receiving fingolimod. Over this period, annualized relapse rates decreased to 0.265 (95% CI: 0.244-0.286) from 1.79 (95% CI: 1.75-1.83), and mean Expanded Disability Status Scale scores remained stable (mean change from baseline: +0.049 [95% CI: -0.015 to +0.114]). In total, 16% of patients had 6-month confirmed disability improvement, 12.5% had 6-month confirmed disability worsening, and 52.4% were free from relapses and 6-month confirmed disability worsening. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were experienced by up to 23.4% and 3.9% of patients, respectively, during any of the 12-month follow-up periods. The frequency and nature of AEs were in line with previous findings. Conclusions Using systematically collected data from PANGAEA, this analysis demonstrates the sustained effectiveness, high persistence, and manageable safety profile of fingolimod over 36 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Michael Lang
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Björn Tackenberg
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Schmidt
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Holger Albrecht
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Luisa Klotz
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Judith Haas
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Lassek
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | - C Anne-Marie Couto
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | - John A Findlay
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Christian Cornelissen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience (T.Z.), Neurological University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology, Dresden; NeuroPoint Patient Academy and Neurological Practice (M.L.), Ulm; Department of Neurology (B.T.), Center of Neuroimmunology, Philipps-University, Marburg; Bonn Neurological Practice (S.S.); Neurological Practice (H.A.), Munich; Department of Neurology (L.K.), University Hospital Münster, Münster; Centre for Multiple Sclerosis (J.H.), Jewish Hospital Berlin; Kassel and Vellmar Neurology Practice (C.L.), Vellmar, Germany; Oxford PharmaGenesis (C.A-M.C.); Oxford PharmaGenesis (J.A.F.), United Kingdom; and Novartis Pharma GmbH (C.C.), Nuremberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Simbrich A, Thibaut J, Khil L, Berger K, Riedel O, Schmedt N. Drug-use patterns and severe adverse events with disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis: a cohort study based on German claims data. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2019; 15:1439-1457. [PMID: 31213818 PMCID: PMC6549763 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s200930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To describe drug-use patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and to estimate the incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs) of treatment. Methods: We conducted a cohort study within the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2013. MS patients on DMDs were described in terms of clinical characteristics and drug-use patterns. Next, we assessed the incidence of AEs in new users of fingolimod, natalizumab, glatiramer acetate, and IFNβ1a. Results: Among approximately 11 million insured members of German Statutory Health Insurance, the DMD-user cohort comprised 15,377 patients with MS, with a mean age of 39.6 years and 68% females. Nearly half of all DMD users had a diagnosis of depression, with prevalence ranging from 40.1% for IFNβ1a to 62.3% for immunoglobulins. The overall rate of MS relapses per patient and year was 0.34 (95% CI 0.33-0.34). During an average follow-up of 1,650 days, the majority (42.4%) of MS patients were adherent to DMD treatment ("continuous single users"), followed by patients interrupting treatment (39.5%, "interrupters"). Switch of DMD treatment (11.9%) was less frequent, and only 5.6% discontinued treatment. Treatment discontinuation was most common in users of natalizumab (7.5%) and IFNβ1b (7.0%). The most frequent SAE was hospitalization for depression, followed by any infectious disease and any malignancy. The incidence rate of all adverse events did not significantly differ across different DMDs. Conclusion: Treatment discontinuation with DMDs and treatment switch were rare. Causes of rather frequent DMD-treatment interruption have to be evaluated in further studies based on primary data collection. Active safety monitoring of new DMDs based on claims data requires large data sets to detect rare AEs and availability of up-to-date data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Simbrich
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Jasmine Thibaut
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Laura Khil
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.,Cancer Registry North Rhine-Westphalia, 44801, Bochum, Germany
| | - Klaus Berger
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Oliver Riedel
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| | - Niklas Schmedt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, 28359 Bremen, Germany.,InGef - Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin GmbH, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mazibrada G, Sharples C, Perfect I. Real-world experience of fingolimod in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS Fine): An observational study in the UK. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2018; 4:2055217318801638. [PMID: 30327723 PMCID: PMC6178378 DOI: 10.1177/2055217318801638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fingolimod is approved for the treatment of highly active relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis in Europe. There is limited information on its effectiveness and safety in clinical practice within the UK. Objective To evaluate retrospectively the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis who were prescribed fingolimod by UK neurologists within the National Health Service. Methods This was a multicentre, observational study conducted in the UK. Patients were initiated on fingolimod 0.5 mg 12 months before inclusion in the study. Key efficacy outcomes included annualised relapse rate and the proportion of patients free from relapses, disability progression and clinical and radiological disease activity at 12 months following fingolimod initiation. Resource utilisation and safety outcomes were also assessed. Results In 12 months of treatment with fingolimod, the mean annualised relapse rate was reduced by 79%, the majority of patients were free from relapses (83.7%). Based on limited data, most patients were free from disability progression and clinical and radiological disease activity. More than 90% of patients continued on fingolimod. Lymphocyte count reductions and liver enzyme increases were observed. Conclusion Fingolimod was effective in reducing the disease activity in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients requiring an escalation from first-line therapies who were prescribed fingolimod in clinical practice in the UK.
Collapse
|