Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Chondroitinase Promote Axonal Regeneration in a Chronic Denervation Animal Model

The significance of M1 macrophage should be highlighted in peripheral nerve regeneration

Macrophage influences peripheral nerve regeneration. According to the classical M1/M2 paradigm, the M1 macrophage is an inhibitor of regeneration, while the M2 macrophage is a promoter. However, several studies have shown that M1 macrophages are indispensable for peripheral nerve repair and facilitate many critical processes in axonal regeneration. In this review, we summarized the information on macrophage polarization and focused on the activities of M1 macrophages in regeneration. We also provided some examples where the macrophage phenotypes were regulated to help regeneration. We argued that the coordination of both macrophage phenotypes might be effective in peripheral nerve repair, and a more comprehensive view of macrophages might contribute to macrophage-based immunomodulatory therapies.

Translational bioengineering strategies for peripheral nerve regeneration: opportunities, challenges, and novel concepts

Peripheral nerve injuries remain a challenging problem in need of better treatment strategies. Despite best efforts at surgical reconstruction and postoperative rehabilitation, patients are often left with persistent, debilitating motor and sensory deficits. There are currently no therapeutic strategies proven to enhance the regenerative process in humans. A clinical need exists for the development of technologies to promote nerve regeneration and improve functional outcomes. Recent advances in the fields of tissue engineering and nanotechnology have enabled biomaterial scaffolds to modulate the host response to tissue repair through tailored mechanical, chemical, and conductive cues. New bioengineered approaches have enabled targeted, sustained delivery of protein therapeutics with the capacity to unlock the clinical potential of a myriad of neurotrophic growth factors that have demonstrated promise in enhancing regenerative outcomes. As such, further exploration of combinatory strategies leveraging these technological advances may offer a pathway towards clinically translatable solutions to advance the care of patients with peripheral nerve injuries. This review first presents the various emerging bioengineering strategies that can be applied for the management of nerve gap injuries. We cover the rationale and limitations for their use as an alternative to autografts, focusing on the approaches to increase the number of regenerating axons crossing the repair site, and facilitating their growth towards the distal stump. We also discuss the emerging growth factor-based therapeutic strategies designed to improve functional outcomes in a multimodal fashion, by accelerating axonal growth, improving the distal regenerative environment, and preventing end-organs atrophy.

Mechanism underlying linezolid-induced peripheral neuropathy in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remains a main global health concern as there is no comprehensive therapeutic intervention yet and numerous adverse effects follow the therapeutic process. In recent years, linezolid has been frequently used for treating MDR-TB. However, peripheral neuropathy associated with linezolid has reduced patient compliance. The current study explored the mechanism underlying linezolid-induced peripheral neuropathy in MDR-TB. Autophagy plays a neuroprotective role against peripheral nerve injury. We hypothesized that autophagy might also play a neuroprotective role against linezolid-induced peripheral neuropathy. In this study, we collected 12 questionnaires from MDR-TB patients in our hospital, and 10 of them developed linezolid-induced pain. The pain is mainly concentrated in the feet and accompanied by numbness. Subsequently, we used Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and Schwann cells (SCs) to explore the mechanism. We found that linezolid causes a sparse arrangement of sciatic nerve tissue with associated loss of neurons, myelin sheaths, and down-regulation of LC3B expression. These results were also confirmed by in vitro experiments, showing that linezolid inhibited the proliferation of SCs. And the expression of P-AKT and P62 was elevated, and the expression of LC3B declined compared with the control group. Moreover, chloroquine (CQ), an autophagy inhibitor, also exhibited experimental results similar to linezolid. In summary, we conclude that linezolid-induced peripheral neuropathy is associated with the inhibition of autophagy flux.

Mechanisms and repair strategies for white matter degeneration in CNS injury and diseases

White matter degeneration is an important pathophysiological event of the central nervous system that is collectively characterized by demyelination, oligodendrocyte loss, axonal degeneration and parenchymal changes that can result in sensory, motor, autonomic and cognitive impairments. White matter degeneration can occur due to a variety of causes including trauma, neurotoxic exposure, insufficient blood flow, neuroinflammation, and developmental and inherited neuropathies. Regardless of the etiology, the degeneration processes share similar pathologic features. In recent years, a plethora of cellular and molecular mechanisms have been identified for axon and oligodendrocyte degeneration including oxidative damage, calcium overload, neuroinflammatory events, activation of proteases, depletion of adenosine triphosphate and energy supply. Extensive efforts have been also made to develop neuroprotective and neuroregenerative approaches for white matter repair. However, less progress has been achieved in this area mainly due to the complexity and multifactorial nature of the degeneration processes. Here, we will provide a timely review on the current understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of white matter degeneration and will also discuss recent pharmacological and cellular therapeutic approaches for white matter protection as well as axonal regeneration, oligodendrogenesis and remyelination.

Defining the relative impact of muscle versus Schwann cell denervation on functional recovery after delayed nerve repair

Functional recovery following peripheral nerve injury worsens with increasing durations of delay prior to repair. From the time of injury until re-innervation occurs, denervated muscle undergoes progressive atrophy that limits the extent to which motor function can be restored. Similarly, Schwann cells (SC) in the distal nerve lacking axonal interaction progressively lose their capacity to proliferate and support regenerating axons. The relative contributions of these processes to diminished functional recovery is unclear. We developed a novel rat model to isolate the effects of SC vs. muscle denervation on functional recovery. Four different groups underwent the following interventions for 12 weeks prior to nerve transfer: 1) muscle denervation; 2) SC denervation; 3) muscle + SC denervation (negative control); 4) no denervation (positive control). Functional recovery was measured weekly using the stimulated grip strength testing (SGST). Animals were sacrificed 13 weeks post nerve transfer. Retrograde labeling was used to assess the number of motor neurons that regenerated their axons. Immunofluorescence was performed to evaluate target muscle re-innervation and atrophy, and to assess the phenotype of the SC within the distal nerve segment. Functional recovery in the muscle denervation and SC denervation groups mirrored that of the negative and positive control groups, respectively. The SC denervation group achieved better functional recovery, with a greater number of reinnervated motor endplates and less muscle atrophy, than the muscle denervation group. Retrograde labeling suggested a higher number of neurons contributing to muscle reinnervation in the muscle denervation group as compared to SC denervation (p > 0.05). The distal nerve segment in the muscle denervation group had a greater proportion of SCs expressing the proliferation marker Ki67 as compared to the SC denervation group (p < 0.05). Conversely, the SC denervation group had a higher percentage of senescent SCs expressing p16 as compared to the muscle denervation group (p < 0.05). The deleterious effects of muscle denervation are more consequential than the effects of SC denervation on functional recovery. The effects of 12 weeks of SC denervation on functional outcome were negligible. Future studies are needed to determine whether longer periods of SC denervation negatively impact functional recovery.

Schwann Cell Role in Selectivity of Nerve Regeneration

Peripheral nerve injuries result in the loss of the motor, sensory and autonomic functions of the denervated segments of the body. Neurons can regenerate after peripheral axotomy, but inaccuracy in reinnervation causes a permanent loss of function that impairs complete recovery. Thus, understanding how regenerating axons respond to their environment and direct their growth is essential to improve the functional outcome of patients with nerve lesions. Schwann cells (SCs) play a crucial role in the regeneration process, but little is known about their contribution to specific reinnervation. Here, we review the mechanisms by which SCs can differentially influence the regeneration of motor and sensory axons. Mature SCs express modality-specific phenotypes that have been associated with the promotion of selective regeneration. These include molecular markers, such as L2/HNK-1 carbohydrate, which is differentially expressed in motor and sensory SCs, or the neurotrophic profile after denervation, which differs remarkably between SC modalities. Other important factors include several molecules implicated in axon-SC interaction. This cell–cell communication through adhesion (e.g., polysialic acid) and inhibitory molecules (e.g., MAG) contributes to guiding growing axons to their targets. As many of these factors can be modulated, further research will allow the design of new strategies to improve functional recovery after peripheral nerve injuries.

Combining timed GDNF and ChABC gene therapy to promote long-distance regeneration following ventral root avulsion and repair

Ventral root avulsion leads to severe motoneuron degeneration and prolonged distal nerve denervation. After a critical period, a state of chronic denervation develops as repair Schwann cells lose their pro-regenerative properties and inhibitory factors such as CSPGs accumulate in the denervated nerve. In rats with ventral root avulsion injuries, we combined timed GDNF gene therapy delivered to the proximal nerve roots with the digestion of inhibitory CSPGs in the distal denervated nerve using sustained lentiviral-mediated chondroitinase ABC (ChABC) enzyme expression. Following reimplantation of lumbar ventral roots, timed GDNF-gene therapy enhanced motoneuron survival up to 45 weeks and improved axonal outgrowth, electrophysiological recovery, and muscle reinnervation. Despite a timed GDNF expression period, a subset of animals displayed axonal coils. Lentiviral delivery of ChABC enabled digestion of inhibitory CSPGs for up to 45 weeks in the chronically denervated nerve. ChABC gene therapy alone did not enhance motoneuron survival, but led to improved muscle reinnervation and modest electrophysiological recovery during later stages of the regeneration process. Combining GDNF treatment with digestion of inhibitory CSPGs did not have a significant synergistic effect. This study suggests a delicate balance exists between treatment duration and concentration in order to achieve therapeutic effects.