Cortical Mechanisms of Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Migraine

Nonmedication Devices in Development for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

 Huge investments continue to be made in treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with more than one hundred drugs currently in development. Pharmacological approaches and drug development, particularly those targeting amyloid-β, have dominated the therapeutic landscape. At the same time, there is also a growing interest in devices for treating AD. This review aimed to identify and describe devices under development for AD treatment. In this review, we queried the devices that are in development for the treatment of AD. PubMed was searched through the end of 2021 using the terms "device," "therapeutics," and "Alzheimer's" for articles that report on devices to treat AD. Ten devices with 31 references were identified as actively being developed for the treatment of AD. Many of these devices are far along in development. Device-based therapies are often overlooked when evaluating treatment approaches to AD. However, many devices for treating AD are in development and some show promising results.

Electrophysiological findings in migraine may reflect abnormal synaptic plasticity mechanisms: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

The cyclical brain disorder of sensory processing accompanying migraine phases lacks an explanatory unified theory.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed for non-invasive neurophysiological studies on migraine and related conditions using transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroencephalography, visual and somatosensory evoked potentials. We summarized the literature, reviewed methods, and proposed a unified theory for the pathophysiology of electrophysiological abnormalities underlying migraine recurrence.

RESULTS

All electrophysiological modalities have determined specific changes in brain dynamics across the different phases of the migraine cycle. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies show unbalanced recruitment of inhibitory and excitatory circuits, more consistently in aura, which ultimately results in a substantially distorted response to neuromodulation protocols. Electroencephalography investigations highlight a steady pattern of reduced alpha and increased slow rhythms, largely located in posterior brain regions, which tends to normalize closer to the attacks. Finally, non-painful evoked potentials suggest dysfunctions in habituation mechanisms of sensory cortices that revert during ictal phases.

CONCLUSION

Electrophysiology shows dynamic and recurrent functional alterations within the brainstem-thalamus-cortex loop varies continuously and recurrently in migraineurs. Given the central role of these structures in the selection, elaboration, and learning of sensory information, these functional alterations suggest chronic, probably genetically determined dysfunctions of the synaptic short- and long-term learning mechanisms.

Nonpharmacological modulation of cortical spreading depolarization

AIMS

Cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is a wave of pathologic neuronal dysfunction that spreads through cerebral gray matter, causing neurologic disturbance in migraine and promoting lesion development in acute brain injury. Pharmacologic interventions have been found to be effective in migraine with aura, but their efficacy in acutely injured brains may be limited. This necessitates the assessment of possible adjunctive treatments, such as nonpharmacologic methods. This review aims to summarize currently available nonpharmacological techniques for modulating CSDs, present their mechanisms of action, and provide insight and future directions for CSD treatment.

MAIN METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed, generating 22 articles across 3 decades. Relevant data is broken down according to method of treatment.

KEY FINDINGS

Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions can mitigate the pathological impact of CSDs via shared molecular mechanisms, including modulating K⁺/Ca²⁺/Na⁺/Cl^- ion channels and NMDA, GABA_A, serotonin, and CGRP ligand-based receptors and decreasing microglial activation. Preclinical evidence suggests that nonpharmacologic interventions, including neuromodulation, physical exercise, therapeutic hypothermia, and lifestyle changes can also target unique mechanisms, such as increasing adrenergic tone and myelination and modulating membrane fluidity, which may lend broader modulatory effects. Collectively, these mechanisms increase the electrical initiation threshold, increase CSD latency, slow CSD velocity, and decrease CSD amplitude and duration.

SIGNIFICANCE

Given the harmful consequences of CSDs, limitations of current pharmacological interventions to inhibit CSDs in acutely injured brains, and translational potentials of nonpharmacologic interventions to modulate CSDs, further assessment of nonpharmacologic modalities and their mechanisms to mitigate CSD-related neurologic dysfunction is warranted.

Development and application of rTMS device to murine model

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is attracting attention as a new treatment technique for brain lesions, and many animal studies showing its effects have been reported. However, the findings of animal application researches cannot directly represent the effects of rTMS in human, mainly due to size difference and mechanistic characteristics of rTMS. Therefore, the authors purposed to develop a mouse rTMS to simulate clinical application and to confirm. Firstly, a virtual head model was created according to magnetic resonance images of murine head. Then, simulations of rTMS stimulation with different coils were performed on the murine head phantom, and an rTMS device for mice was fabricated based on the optimal voltage conditions. Lastly, strengths of magnetic fields generated by the two rTMS devices, for human (conventional clinical use) and mouse (newly fabricated), were measured in air and on mouse head and compared. Resultantly, the magnetic field intensity generated by coil of mouse was lower than human's (p < 0.01), and no differences were found between the predicted simulation values and the measured intensity in vivo (p > 0.05). Further in vivo researches using miniaturized rTMS devices for murine head should be followed to be more meaningful for human.

Primary headache disorders: From pathophysiology to neurostimulation therapies

Primary headache disorders including migraine, cluster headache, and tension-type headache are among the most common disabling diseases worldwide. The unclear pathogenesis of primary headache disorders has led to high rates of misdiagnosis and limited available treatment options. In this review, we have summarized the pathophysiological factors for a better understanding of primary headache disorders. Advances in functional neuroimaging, genetics, neurophysiology have indicated that cortical hyperexcitability, regional brain dysfunction, central sensitization and neuroplasticity changes play vital roles in the development of primary headache disorders. Moreover, we have also discussed a series of neurostimulation approaches with their stimulation mechanism, safety and efficacy for prevention and treatment of primary headache disorders. Noninvasive or implantable neurostimulation techniques show great promise for treating refractory primary headache disorders.

TMS-evoked EEG potentials demonstrate altered cortical excitability in migraine with aura

Migraine is associated with altered sensory processing, that may be evident as changes in cortical responsivity due to altered excitability, especially in migraine with aura. Cortical excitability can be directly assessed by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). We measured TMS evoked potential (TEP) amplitude and response consistency as these measures have been linked to cortical excitability but were not yet reported in migraine.We recorded 64-channel EEG during single-pulse TMS on the vertex interictally in 10 people with migraine with aura and 10 healthy controls matched for age, sex and resting motor threshold. On average 160 pulses around resting motor threshold were delivered through a circular coil in clockwise and counterclockwise direction. Trial-averaged TEP responses, frequency spectra and phase clustering (over the entire scalp as well as in frontal, central and occipital midline electrode clusters) were compared between groups, including comparison to sham-stimulation evoked responses.Migraine and control groups had a similar distribution of TEP waveforms over the scalp. In migraine with aura, TEP responses showed reduced amplitude around the frontal and occipital N100 peaks. For the migraine and control groups, responses over the scalp were affected by current direction for the primary motor cortex, somatosensory cortex and sensory association areas, but not for frontal, central or occipital midline clusters.This study provides evidence of altered TEP responses in-between attacks in migraine with aura. Decreased TEP responses around the N100 peak may be indicative of reduced cortical GABA-mediated inhibition and expand observations on enhanced cortical excitability from earlier migraine studies using more indirect measurements.

Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the preventive treatment of difficult-to-treat migraine: a 12-month prospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Initial evidence have shown the short-term efficacy of sTMS in the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. It is unknown whether this treatment approach in the long-term is effective and well tolerated in difficult-to-treat migraine.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single centre, open-label, real-world analysis conducted in difficult-to-treat patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM) with and without medication overuse headache (MOH), who were exposed to sTMS therapy. Patients responding to a three-month sTMS treatment, continued the treatment and were assessed again at month 12. The cut-off outcome for treatment continuation was reduction in the monthly moderate to severe headache days (MHD) of at least 30% (headache frequency responders) and/or a ≥ 4-point reduction in headache disability using the Headache Impact test-6 (HIT-6) (headache disability responders).

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-three patients were included in the analysis (F:M = 126:27, median age 43, IQR 32.3-56.8). At month 3, 93 out of 153 patients (60%) were responders to treatment. Compared to baseline, the median reduction in monthly headache days (MHD) for all patients at month 3 was 5.0 days, from 18.0 (IQR: 12.0-26.0) to 13.0 days (IQR: 5.75-24.0) (P = 0.002, r = - 0.29) and the median reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) was 4.0 days, from 13.0 (IQR: 8.75-22.0) to 9.0 (IQR: 4.0-15.25) (P = 0.002, r = - 0.29). Sixty-nine out of 153 patients (45%) reported a sustained response to sTMS treatment at month 12. The percentage of patients with MOH was reduced from 52% (N = 79/153) at baseline to 19% (N = 29/153) at month 3, to 8% (N = 7/87) at month 12. There was an overall median 4-point reduction in HIT-6 score, from 66 (IQR: 64-69) at baseline to 62 at month 3 (IQR: 56-65) (P < 0.001, r = - 0.51). A total of 35 mild/moderate adverse events were reported by 23 patients (15%). One patient stopped sTMS treatment due to scalp sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

This open label analysis suggests that sTMS may be an effective, well-tolerated treatment option for the long-term prevention of difficult-to-treat CM and HFEM.

Devices for Episodic Migraine: Past, Present, and Future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Historically, therapies for migraine have generally involved pharmacological treatments using non-selective or selective analgesics and preventive treatments. However, for many patients these treatments are not effective, while others prefer to use non-pharmacological-based therapies. To fill this need, over the last 15 years, neuromodulatory devices have entered the market for migraine treatment. Here, we will review the most recent findings for the use of these devices in the treatment of migraine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation and spring-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation are both cleared for the treatment of migraine, supported by preclinical studies that validate efficacy and mechanism of action, and complemented with clinical trial data. Other options also authorized for use include transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation and remote electrical neuromodulation. Various options are available to treat migraine using authorized neuromodulatory devices. These data support their efficacy in the treatment of episodic migraine, although further studies are necessary to elucidate their mechanism of action and to provide rigor to clinical trial data.

Decreased brain GABA levels in patients with migraine without aura: an exploratory proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study

Increasing neurophysiological studies had revealed that regional excitation-inhibition imbalance in the brain played a key role in the pathogenesis of migraine. This study aimed to explore the alterations in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate/glutamine complex (Glx) levels in the anterior cingulate gyrus (ACC) and medial prefrontal lobe (mPFC) of patients with migraine without aura (MWoA) and investigate the correlation between neurotransmitter levels and clinical indicators. A total of 28 patients with MWoA and 28 sex-, age-, and education level-matched healthy controls (HCs) underwent single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy scanning at 3.0 Tesla. MEscher-Garwood Point RESolved Spectroscopy (MEGA-PRESS) sequence was performed to acquire the spectral data of GABA and Glx in the ACC and mPFC. The clinical indicators and anxiety-depression states of all participants were assessed. The acquired GABA signal contained the overlapping signals of macromolecules and homocarnosine, hence expressed as GABA+. The creatine (Cr) signal was applied as an endogenous reference. We observed that GABA+/Cr levels were significantly lower in ACC and mPFC of patients with MWoA than of HCs, with no significant difference in Glx levels. Negative correlations between GABA+/Cr levels and attack frequency were found in the ACC and mPFC regions of patients. These results suggested that there might be a close relationship between ACC and mPFC GABAergic neurons abnormalities and the pathophysiological mechanisms of MWoA. It might be beneficial to targeted treatment for patients with MWoA.

Updated review on the link between cortical spreading depression and headache disorders

INTRODUCTION

Experimental animal studies have revealed mechanisms that link cortical spreading depression (CSD) to the trigeminal activation mediating lateralized headache. However, conventional CSD as seen in lissencephalic brain is insufficient to explain some clinical features of aura and migraine headache.

AREAS COVERED

The importance of CSD in headache development including dysfunction of the thalamocortical network, neuroinflammation, calcitonin gene-related peptide, transgenic models, and the role of CSD in migraine triggers, treatment options, neuromodulation and future directions are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

The conventional understanding of CSD marching across the hemisphere is invalid in gyrencephalic brains. Thalamocortical dysfunction and interruption of functional cortical network systems by CSD, may provide alternative explanations for clinical manifestations of migraine phases including aura. Not all drugs showing CSD blocking properties in lissencephalic brains, have efficacy in migraine headache and monoclonal antibodies against CGRP ligand/receptors which are effective in migraine treatment, have no impact on aura in humans or CSD properties in rodents. Functional networks and molecular mechanisms mediating and amplifying the effects of limited CSD in migraine brain remain to be investigated to define new targets.

Noninvasive Neuromodulation in Headache: An Update

Background

Migraine is a common disabling primary headache condition. Although strives have been made in treatment, there remains an unmet need for safe, effective acute, and preventative treatments. The promising concept of neuromodulation of relevant neuronal targets in a noninvasive fashion for the treatment of primary headache disorders has led to the trial of numerous devices over the years.

Objective

We aimed to review the evidence on current neuromodulation treatments available for the management of primary headache disorders.

Methods

Randomized controlled trial as well as open-label and real-world studies on central and peripheral cephalic and noncephalic neuromodulation modalities in primary headaches were critically reviewed.

Results

The current evidence suggests a role of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, supraorbital nerve stimulation, and remote noncephalic electrical stimulation as migraine abortive treatments, with stronger evidence in episodic rather than in chronic migraine. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and supraorbital nerve stimulation also hold promising evidence in episodic migraine prevention and initial positive evidence in chronic migraine prevention. More evidence should clarify the therapeutic role of the external vagus nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in migraine. However, external vagus nerve stimulation may be effective in the acute treatment of episodic but not chronic cluster headache, in the prevention of hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania but not of short-lasting neuralgiform headache attacks. The difficulty in setting up sham-controlled studies has thus far prevented the publication of robust trials. This limitation along with the cost of these therapies has meant that their use is limited in most countries.

Conclusion

Neuromodulation is a promising nonpharmacological treatment approach for primary headaches. More studies with appropriate blinding strategies and reduction of device cost may allow more widespread approval of these treatments and in turn increase clinician's experience in neuromodulation.

Emerging Technologies and Indications of Neuromodulation and Increasing Role of Non Invasive Neuromodulation

Altering the enormous complex connectivity and output of the central nervous system is one of the most fascinating development in medical technologies. It harbors the ability to treat and modulate different neurological disorders and diseases such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and even help with drug delivery to treat unreachable areas of brain via opening of the blood brain barrier. Evolution of neuromodulation techniques has been significant in last few years. They have become less invasive and more focused. Newer neuromodulation techniques consist of invasive, minimally invasive and non-invasive technologies. The decision to use one of these technologies depends on the indication and the targeted area within the central or peripheral nervous system. In the last decade technological advances and the urge to minimize the surgical and the long term complications of hardware implantation, have pushed the neurosurgical community to increase the use of non-invasive neuromodulation technics. In this article, we will discuss the different emerging technologies in neuromodulation and the increasing role of non-invasive neuromodulation.