Turkish version of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument in the assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a validity and reliability study

Plantar fascia stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Stiffness effect on fall risk and gait speed

AIMS

The primary objective was to compare patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and healthy peers in terms of plantar fascia (PF) stiffness, fall risk, and gait speed. The second objective was to examine the relationship between stiffness of PF and fall risk, gait speed.

METHODS

Fifty patients diagnosed with T2DM (mean duration = 10.74 ± 7.07 years) were included. Myotonometer was used to evaluate the stiffness of PF. To assess the risk of falling, and gait speed, the International Fall Efficiency Scale (FES-I) and the 4-Meter Gait Speed Test (4mGST) were used, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared to healthy controls, PF stiffness (right foot mean difference = 148.99 N/m, left foot mean difference = 113.13 N/m p < .001) was higher in the T2DM group. The FES-I and 4mGST scores were worse in the group with T2DM (p < .05). 12.8 % of FES-I and 23.4 % of 4mGST variance were explained by stiffness of PF.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study showed that the stiffness of PF changed in patients with T2DM. There was a decrease in gait speed and an increase in the risk of falling as PF stiffness increased.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose intramuscular vitamin D2 injection in type 2 diabetes mellitus with distal symmetric polyneuropathy combined with vitamin D insufficiency: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial

Background

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) is the most common chronic complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DSPN may lead to more serious complications, such as diabetic foot ulcer, amputation, and reduced life expectancy. Observational studies have suggested that vitamin D deficiency may be associated with the development of DSPN in T2DM. However, interventional studies have found that low-dose vitamin D supplementation does not significantly improve neuropathy in DSPN. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intramuscular injection of high-dose vitamin D (HDVD) in T2DM with DSPN combined with vitamin D insufficiency.

Methods and analysis

We will conduct a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial in four large hospitals. All eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either the vitamin D₂ supplement or placebo control group and injected intramuscularly monthly for 3 months. Additionally, anthropometric measurements and clinical data will be collected at baseline and 3 months. Adverse events will be collected at 1, 2, and 3 months. The primary outcome measure is the change in the mean Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score at baseline and 3 months post-intervention. We will use the gold-standard liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method to distinguish between 25(OH)D₂ and 25(OH)D₃ levels. The MNSN score before the intervention will be used as a covariate to compare the changes between both groups before and after the intervention, and the analysis of covariance will be used to analyze the change in the MNSI score after HDVD supplementation.

Discussion

Glycemic control alone does not prevent the progression of DSPN in T2DM. Some studies have suggested that vitamin D may improve DSPN; however, the exact dose, method, and duration of vitamin D supplementation are unknown. Additionally, neuropathy repair requires HDVD supplementation to sustain adequate vitamin D levels. This once-a-month intramuscular method avoids daily medication; therefore, compliance is high. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial in China to analyze the efficacy and safety of HDVD supplementation for patients with T2DM and DSPN and will provide new ideas for pharmacological research and clinical treatment of diabetic neuropathy.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2200062266.

Validity and reliability of the Polish version of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument

BACKGROUND

Diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy is an important risk factor for foot ulceration and amputation. Thus, patients with diabetes should be screened for this disorder according to local guidelines. An obstacle to the diagnosis of this disease may be the lack of unified diagnostic criteria due to the lack of properly validated scales used for assessment.

AIM

To validate both sections (A and B) of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) in Polish (PL) patients with diabetes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using a test (A1, B1) and re-test (A2, B2) formula was performed in 80 patients with diabetes. The gold standard used for neuropathy detection was a nerve conduction study (NCS) which was performed in all participants. Reliability of the MNSI-PL was assessed using the Cronbach’s alpha, Kuder-Richardson formula 20 (KR-20), split-half reliability, the Gottman split-half tests, and correlation between first and second half was accessed. Stability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For external validation, we used simple linear correlation, binomial regression, and agreement between two different tools using a Bland-Altman plot analysis.

RESULTS

The scale was internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha for the full scale: 0.81 for A and 0.87 for B). MNSI-PL scores in test/retest showed high stability (ICC = 0.73 for A and ICC = 0.97 for B). The statistically important correlations between MNSI-PL and NCS were found for B1, B2, and A1 (P < 0.005). The cut-off points of ≥ 3 for section A (sensitivity of 90%-100%; specificity of 33%-40%) and ≥ 2 for section B (sensitivity of 81%-84%; specificity of 60%-70%) were obtained during neuropathy detection.

CONCLUSION

The MNSI-PL is a reliable and valid instrument in screening for diabetic neuropathy.

Precision of Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) Tool for the Diagnosis of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Among People with Type 2 Diabetes-A Study from South India

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the risk factors for foot-related complications among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Hence, we aimed to validate the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) tool against biothesiometer with a cut-off value of ≥25 V and also to determine the cut-off point of MNSI score for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy among people with T2DM in India. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 357 people with T2DM in a tertiary care centre for diabetes in Chennai, South India. The eligible study participants underwent testing with a biothesiometer and the MNSI tool was administered. The patient version tool of MNSI was translated to the local language, Tamil. The MNSI scores (1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5) were compared with biothesiometer value. For the MNSI scores of less than 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5, sensitivities were 97.6%, 97.6%, 96.8%, and 77.8% and specificities were 76.6%, 77.9%, 85.7%, and 88.3% respectively. The cut-off value of MNSI score was derived as two with AUC of 0.934. The sensitivity was 96.8% and the specificity was 85.7% with 89.6% accuracy. The high sensitivity indicates the positive cases are diagnosed correctly. There is no validated tool available for detection of DPN in Indian population. The Indian version of MNSI tool was found to be effective for screening diabetic neuropathy among people with T2DM. The MNSI tool was found to be reliable, convenient, and non-invasive for diagnosis of DPN and can be used in routine clinical settings.

Translation, validation, and diagnostic accuracy of the Arabic version of the Michigan neuropathy screening instrument

The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) is used to screen patients for diabetic neuropathy (DNP). We aimed to translate the MNSI questionnaire into Arabic (MNSIq-Ar) and to assess the validity and diagnostic performance of the MNSI Arabic version (MNSI-Ar).Cronbach alpha α and the interclass correlation coefficient were used to measure the reliability and reproducibility of the MNSIq-Ar. The instrument's validity was assessed by Spearman correlation with the Utah Early Neuropathy Scale (UENS), the Modified Toronto Neuropathy Score (mTCNS), diabetic neuropathy symptoms (DNS), and sural nerve amplitude (SNA). The construct validity of the MNSI-Ar was assessed by its ability to differentiate the severity of DNP (using the Kruskal-Wallis test). The diagnostic performance was assessed through the receiver operator curve area.We recruited 89 participants (mean [SD] age, 50.8 [12.3] years; 48% men). The MNSIq-Ar showed an α of 0.81 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94, and the correlation coefficients with UENS, mTCNS, DNS, and sural nerve amplitude were 0.67, 0.83, 0.73, and -0.49, respectively (all P < .0001). The MNSI-Ar was able to differentiate the different severities of DNP. The receiver operator curve area was 0.93 with a high sensitivity of 95.9% and 100% for probable and confirmed DNP, respectively.MNSI-Ar is a reliable and valid tool to screen for diabetic neuropathy in the Arabic language with a good diagnostic performance and high sensitivity.