Safety evaluation of chronic intrathecal administration of heparan N-sulfatase in juvenile cynomolgus monkeys

Long-term safety and clinical outcomes of intrathecal heparan-N-sulfatase in patients with Sanfilippo syndrome type A

INTRODUCTION

Currently, there is no effective therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis IIIA (MPS IIIA). Intravenously-administered enzyme replacement therapies, while effective in other forms of MPS without neurological involvement, have not been successful in patients with MPS IIIA, as they are unable to cross the blood-brain barrier to improve neurological symptoms. We evaluated the long-term safety, tolerability, and clinical outcomes of recombinant human heparan-N-sulfatase (rhHNS) administered intrathecally (IT) in children with MPS IIIA in a phase 1/2 extension study.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥3 years with MPS IIIA who had previously completed a phase 1/2 study and received ≥5 of the 6 planned rhHNS infusions via IT administration, were eligible for inclusion. Patients who received 10 mg in the phase 1/2 study had their dose increased to 45 mg. Patients who were treated with 45 mg or 90 mg rhHNS IT in the phase 1/2 study remained on this monthly dose in the extension study. rhHNS was administered via an intrathecal drug delivery device (IDDD). Primary endpoints included the type and severity of adverse events, presence of anti-rhHNS antibodies in the CSF and serum, and changes in laboratory values. Secondary endpoints included standardized neurocognitive assessments and brain magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

In the extension study, 12 patients with a mean (SD) age of 9.6 (7.3) years continued treatment with rhHNS IT for a median of 264.4 weeks. Ten of 12 patients completed the extension study. rhHNS IT was generally well-tolerated. All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), most being mild or moderate in severity. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were considered related to the study drug, and no deaths occurred. Most SAEs were related to malfunctions of the IDDD. Declines from baseline in Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition or Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition, Nonverbal Index developmental quotient scores were evident at all rhHNS dosing groups: -17.97%, -18.99%, and -12.12% in the 10/45, 45, and 90 mg groups, respectively, at Month 54.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, rhHNS IT was well tolerated in the extension study. However, rhHNS IT was unable to slow the neurocognitive decline of patients with MPS IIIA. This study was subsequently terminated early because pre-specified efficacy criteria were not met, and the study did not yield clinical proof of concept. (Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01299727).

Novel therapies for mucopolysaccharidosis type III

Mucopolysaccharidosis type III (MPS III) or Sanfilippo disease is an orphan inherited lysosomal storage disease and one of the most common MPS subtypes. The classical presentation is an infantile-onset neurodegenerative disease characterised by intellectual regression, behavioural and sleep disturbances, loss of ambulation, and early death. Unlike other MPS, no disease-modifying therapy has yet been approved. Here, we review the numerous approaches of curative therapy developed for MPS III from historical ineffective haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and substrate reduction therapy to the promising ongoing clinical trials based on enzyme replacement therapy or adeno-associated or lentiviral vectors mediated gene therapy. Preclinical studies are presented alongside the most recent translational first-in-man trials. In addition, we present experimental research with preclinical mRNA and gene editing strategies. Lessons from animal studies and clinical trials have highlighted the importance of an early therapy before extensive neuronal loss. A disease-modifying therapy for MPS III will undoubtedly mandate development of new strategies for early diagnosis.

Nonclinical comparability studies of recombinant human arylsulfatase A addressing manufacturing process changes

Recombinant human arylsulfatase A (rhASA) is in clinical development for the treatment of patients with metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD). Manufacturing process changes were introduced to improve robustness and efficiency, resulting in higher levels of mannose-6-phosphate and sialic acid in post-change (process B) compared with pre-change (process A) rhASA. A nonclinical comparability program was conducted to compare process A and process B rhASA. All doses were administered intrathecally. Pharmacodynamic comparability was evaluated in immunotolerant MLD mice, using immunohistochemical staining of lysosomal-associated membrane protein-1 (LAMP-1). Pharmacokinetic comparability was assessed in juvenile cynomolgus monkeys dosed once with 6.0 mg (equivalent to 100 mg/kg of brain weight) process A or process B rhASA. Biodistribution was compared by quantitative whole-body autoradiography in rats. Potential toxicity of process B rhASA was evaluated by repeated rhASA administration at doses of 18.6 mg in juvenile cynomolgus monkeys. The specific activities for process A and process B rhASA were 89 U/mg and 106 U/mg, respectively, which were both well within the target range for the assay. Pharmacodynamic assessments showed no statistically significant differences in LAMP-1 immunohistochemical staining in the spinal cord and in most of the brain areas assessed between process A and B rhASA-dosed mice. LAMP-1 staining was reduced with both process A and B rhASA compared with vehicle, supporting its activity. Concentration–time curves in cerebrospinal fluid and serum of cynomolgus monkeys were similar with process A and B rhASA. Process A and B rhASA were similar in terms of their pharmacokinetic parameters and biodistribution data. No process B rhASA-related toxicity was detected. In conclusion, manufacturing process changes did not affect the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic or safety profiles of process B rhASA relative to process A rhASA.

Safety Evaluation of CNS Administered Biologics-Study Design, Data Interpretation, and Translation to the Clinic

Many central nervous system (CNS) diseases are inadequately treated by systemically administered therapies due to the blood brain barrier (BBB), which prevents achieving adequate drug concentrations at sites of action. Due to the increasing prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases and the inability of most systemically administered therapies to cross the BBB, direct CNS delivery will likely play an increasing role in treatment. Administration of large molecules, cells, viral vectors, oligonucleotides, and other novel therapies directly to the CNS via the subarachnoid space, ventricular system, or parenchyma overcomes this obstacle. Clinical experience with direct CNS administration of small molecule therapies suggests that this approach may be efficacious for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders using biological therapies. Risks of administration into the brain tissue or cerebrospinal fluid include local damage from implantation of the delivery system and/or administration of the therapeutic and reactions affecting the CNS. Preclinical safety studies on CNS administered compounds must differentiate between the effects of the test article, the delivery device, and/or the vehicle, and assess exacerbations of reactions due to combinations of effects. Animal models characterized for safety assessment of CNS administered therapeutics have enabled human trials, but interpretation can be challenging. This manuscript outlines the challenges of preclinical intrathecal/intracerebroventricular/intraparenchymal studies, evaluation of results, considerations for special endpoints, and translation of preclinical findings to enable first-in-human trials. Recommendations will be made based on the authors' collective experience with conducting these studies to enable clinical development of CNS-administered biologics.

Whole Body and CNS Biodistribution of rhHNS in Cynomolgus Monkeys after Intrathecal Lumbar Administration: Treatment Implications for Patients with MPS IIIA

Mucopolysaccharidosis III type A (MPS IIIA; Sanfilippo syndrome), a genetic lysosomal disorder causing a deficiency of heparan N-sulfatase (HNS), leads to progressive cognitive decline from an early age. An effective enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for MPS IIIA requires central nervous system (CNS) biodistribution. Recombinant human heparan N-sulfatase (rhHNS), an investigatory ERT for MPS IIIA, has been formulated for intrathecal (IT) administration since intravenous (IV) administration cannot cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) in sufficient amounts to have a therapeutic effect. In this study, systemic and CNS distribution of rhHNS in cynomolgus monkeys following IV and IT administration was evaluated by quantitation of rhHNS in serum, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and various tissues, and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of live animals. Following IV administration, rhHNS levels were low to non-detectable in the CSF, and systemic clearance was rapid (≤2 h). With IT administration, rhHNS was observable in CNS tissues in ≤1 h, with varying T_max (1-24 h). Appreciable systemic distribution was observed up to 7 days. This provides evidence that in this animal model, intrathecal administration of rhHNS delivers the replacement enzyme to therapeutically relevant tissues for the treatment of Sanfilippo Syndrome type A. Penetration into grey matter and cortex was 3-4 times greater than concentrations in white matter and deeper parenchymal regions, suggesting some limitations of this ERT strategy.

A phase 1/2 study of intrathecal heparan-N-sulfatase in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis IIIA

OBJECTIVE

This was an open-label, phase 1/2 dose-escalation, safety trial of intrathecal recombinant human heparan-N-sulfatase (rhHNS) administered via intrathecal drug delivery device (IDDD) for treating mucopolysaccharidosis IIIA (NCT01155778).

STUDY DESIGN

Twelve patients received 10, 45, or 90mg of rhHNS via IDDD once monthly for a total of 6 doses. Primary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and anti-rhHNS antibodies. Secondary endpoints included standardized neurocognitive assessments, cortical gray matter volume, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses.

RESULTS

All patients experienced treatment-emergent AEs; most of mild-to-moderate severity. Seven patients reported a total of 10 serious AEs (SAEs), all but one due to hospitalization to revise a nonfunctioning IDDD. No SAEs were considered related to rhHNS. Anti-rhHNS antibodies were detected in the serum of 6 patients and in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 2 of these. CSF heparan sulfate levels were elevated at baseline and there were sustained declines in all tested patients following the first rhHNS dose. No impact of anti-rhHNS antibodies on any pharmacodynamic or safety parameters was evident. 4 of 12 patients showed a decline in developmental quotient, 6 were stable, and 2 patients had only a single data point. No dose group showed a clearly different response pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

rhHNS administration via IDDD appeared generally safe and well tolerated. Treatment resulted in consistent declines in CSF heparan sulfate, suggesting in vivo activity in the relevant anatomical compartment. Results of this small study should be interpreted with caution. Future studies are required to assess the potential clinical benefits of rhHNS and to test improved IDDD models.

Workshop Proceedings

A workshop entitled “Streamlined Development of Safety Assessment Programs Supporting Orphan/Rare Diseases—Are We There Yet?” was held at the 36th Annual Meeting of the American College of Toxicology in Summerlin, Nevada. The workshop was sponsored by Shire and Ultragenyx and was designed to present the nonclinical considerations for the development of various products for rare diseases. A panel of experts from industry and government highlighted the nonclinical considerations in developing toxicology programs supporting rare disease therapeutics, challenges in preclinical safety assessment, reviewed the current guidance, and presented the progress that has been made to date. The main learning from the workshop was that nonclinical testing of therapeutics targeting rare disease warrants special considerations, and early collaboration between sponsors and health authorities may help optimize the scope and timing of the supportive studies. Specific examples for nonclinical development programs for enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) were presented. Although the symposium focused on ERTs, the concepts are broadly applicable.

Intrathecal delivery of protein therapeutics to the brain: a critical reassessment

Disorders of the central nervous system (CNS), including stroke, neurodegenerative diseases, and brain tumors, are the world's leading causes of disability. Delivery of drugs to the CNS is complicated by the blood-brain barriers that protect the brain from the unregulated leakage and entry of substances, including proteins, from the blood. Yet proteins represent one of the most promising classes of therapeutics for the treatment of CNS diseases. Many strategies for overcoming these obstacles are in development, but the relatively straightforward approach of bypassing these barriers through direct intrathecal administration has been largely overlooked. Originally discounted because of its lack of usefulness for delivering small, lipid-soluble drugs to the brain, the intrathecal route has emerged as a useful, in some cases perhaps the ideal, route of administration for certain therapeutic protein and targeted disease combinations. Here, we review blood-brain barrier functions and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and their relevance to drug delivery via the intrathecal route, discuss animal and human studies that have investigated intrathecal delivery of protein therapeutics, and outline several characteristics of protein therapeutics that can allow them to be successfully delivered intrathecally.