Under-Treatment of Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis in the United States: Analysis of Medication Usage with Health Plan Data

Health disparities in psoriasis: geographic barriers to access in the United States

PURPOSE

Providers who treat patients with psoriasis are unevenly distributed across the United States, with more in urban than rural areas. This retrospective claims analysis characterized disparities in access to care for US patients with psoriasis using data from the STATinMED database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (≥18 years) had ≥1 claim with a psoriasis diagnosis and ≥1 claim for advanced psoriasis therapy (apremilast or biologics) between January 2015 and December 2019. Access to psoriasis care was determined using the proportion of patients with 0, 1-2, 3-4, or ≥5 providers in their local area.

RESULTS

Overall, 179,688 patients were included in the analysis, 80.0% in urban areas. The access ratio was highest for internal medicine physicians (97.1 per 1000 patients) and lowest for dermatologists (4.4 per 1000 patients) and family practice physicians (3.9 per 1000 patients). In urban areas, 41% of patients had access to ≥5 dermatologists versus 7% in rural areas. Whereas 2% of patients in urban areas sought care outside of their local area, 75% in rural areas did so. Use of advanced therapies was low in all states (<17%).

CONCLUSION

Access to psoriasis-treating providers varied widely. Regardless of access, utilization of advanced treatments was low, suggesting the need for effective, easy-to-administer therapy.

Barriers and suggestions for improving the implementation of guidelines in the systemic treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: A literature review

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of a wide range of therapies for the systemic treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis, many psoriasis patients do not receive adequate treatment, suggesting that guidelines may not be correctly applied by physicians.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze data on physicians' implementation of, and reasons for noncompliance with, guidelines for the systemic treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review according to the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for studies on guideline adherence in the systemic treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. All eligible articles were retrieved in full text and the relevant references of retrieved articles were included.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were selected. Four studies investigated knowledge of the guidelines, six studies examined their application, and five studies focused on the various barriers to implementation. Finally, five studies discussed ways to improve implementation. Several studies on the quality of psoriasis care have revealed discrepancies between the reality and the optimal care described in national and international guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Various barriers to implementation of recommendations exist, such as economic barriers, lack of dermatologic orientation towards, lack of knowledge of recommendations by other specialists, lack of applicability, and country- and practice-specific features (e.g., different benefit/risk ratios, different reimbursement rates and conditions). This review can help the everyday practitioner to better understand these barriers, which will have a direct impact on improving the quality of life of psoriasis patients.

Deucravacitinib in plaque psoriasis: 2-year safety and efficacy results from the phase III POETYK trials

BACKGROUND

In the phase III POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials, deucravacitinib, an oral selective allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, was well tolerated and efficacious over 1 year in patients with psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate deucravacitinib safety and efficacy over 2 years in patients participating in the phase III trials.

METHODS

In the POETYK long-term extension (LTE), an ongoing phase IIIb open-label trial, adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who completed PSO-1 or PSO-2 receive deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily. Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameter abnormalities. Efficacy endpoints, including ≥ 75% reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) and static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0/1 (clear/almost clear), were evaluated in patients originally randomized to deucravacitinib, patients who crossed over from placebo at week 16 and patients who achieved PASI 75 at week 24 (peak efficacy).

RESULTS

At data cutoff (1 October 2021), 1519 patients had received at least one dose of deucravacitinib; 79.0% and 39.9% had ≥ 52 weeks and ≥ 104 weeks of total deucravacitinib exposure, respectively. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 person-years were similar at 1 year and 2 years for any AEs (229.2 vs. 154.4, respectively), serious AEs (5.7 vs. 6.1), discontinuations (4.4 vs. 2.8), deaths (0.2 vs. 0.4), serious infections (1.7 vs. 2.6), herpes zoster (0.9 vs. 0.8), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.3 vs. 0.4), venous thromboembolic events (0.2 vs. 0.1) and malignancies (1.0 vs. 0.9). EAIRs for COVID-19 infections were higher at 2 years than at 1 year (5.1 vs. 0.5) owing to the peak of the global COVID-19 pandemic occurring during the LTE. No clinically meaningful changes from baseline or trends were observed over 2 years in haematological, chemistry or lipid parameters. Clinical responses were maintained in patients who received continuous deu-cravacitinib treatment from baseline [PASI 75: week 52, 72.4%; week 112, 79.7%; sPGA 0/1: week 52, 57.9%; week 112, 61.1% (as observed)]. Responses at week 52 were also maintained in placebo crossovers and in week-24 PASI-75 responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Deucravacitinib maintained efficacy and demonstrated consistent safety with no new safety signals observed through 2 years.

Treatment Patterns and Negative Health Outcomes in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Patients in Germany and the US

INTRODUCTION

Limited information exists on the epidemiology, treatment, and burden of palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) and defining the optimal course of treatment remains challenging without approved targeted treatments in most countries. Here, we describe the clinical and demographic characteristics, treatments received, and negative health outcomes experienced among patients with PPP in the United States (US) and Germany.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study between 2016 and 2021 using data from the US Merative™ MarketScan® Research Database and IQVIA™ German Disease Analyzer. Adult patients with PPP (ICD-10-CM L40.3) were followed from the date of their first qualifying PPP diagnosis and continued until the earlier of disenrollment or end date of database, during which treatment patterns and incidence rates of negative health outcomes were assessed. Treatment patterns included adherence, non-persistence, discontinuation, re-initiation, switching, and combination therapy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of PPP was 0.005% and 0.065% in the MarketScan database and German Disease Analyzer, respectively, with 1629 and 3866 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Most patients were female (71.3%, 67.8%), with mean (SD) age of 54.1 (11.7) and 56.9 (14.3) years, respectively. One year post index, most patients received topical treatment (77.4%, 65.3%), but non-persistence and discontinuation were high. Oral and biologic treatments displayed higher levels of adherence, particularly apremilast and tofacitinib among oral treatments and TNF inhibitors and IL-23 inhibitors among biologics. Rates of negative health outcomes were higher among patients not receiving treatment post-index compared with those receiving treatment post-index across both databases, regardless of prior treatment history.

CONCLUSIONS

Establishing treatment guidelines remains an unmet need for patients with PPP and could improve quality of life by reducing the occurrence of negative health outcomes. The findings from this study may provide insight into the effectiveness of current treatment options for patients with PPP and can be leveraged to support the development of treatment guidelines.

Self-assembled hyaluronic acid nanoparticles for the topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases: Beyond drug carriers

Inflammatory skin diseases represent a significant health concern, affecting approximately 20-25% of the global population. These conditions not only reduce an individual's quality of life but also impose a huge burden on both humanity and society. However, addressing these challenges is hindered by their chronic nature, insufficient therapeutic effectiveness, and the propensity for recurrence and adverse side effects. Hyaluronic acid (HA) has emerged as a potential solution to these barriers, owing to its excellent attributes such as biocompatibility, non-toxicity, and targeted drug delivery. However, its practical application has been limited because endogenous hyaluronidase (HYAL) rapidly degrades HA in inflamed skin thus reducing its ability to penetrate deep into the skin. Interestingly, recent research has expanded the role of self-assembled HA-nanoparticles (HA-NPs) beyond drug carriers; they are resistant to HYAL, thereby enabling deep skin penetration, and possess inherent anti-inflammatory properties. Moreover, these abilities can be fine-tuned depending on the conditions during particle synthesis. Additionally, their role as a drug delivery system holds potential for use as a multi-target drug or hybrid drug. In conclusion, this review aims to specifically introduce and highlight the emerging potential of HA-NPs as a topical treatment for inflammatory skin conditions.

Redefining Disease Severity with Special Area Involvement and Reflecting on Treatment Patterns in a Real-World Psoriasis Population

BACKGROUND

The International Psoriasis Council (IPC) recommends an approach that considers body surface area (BSA), involvement in special areas, and treatment history for classifying patients as candidates for topical or systemic treatment. This study aimed to quantify the burden of psoriasis by describing BSA distribution, special area involvement, and treatments in a real-world population.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with psoriasis from the Optum® deidentified Electronic Health Records database with a BSA value (< 3%, 3-10%, and > 10%) recorded between 1 March 2014 and 1 September 2020. Treatments and special area involvement (face, scalp, palms/soles, nails, genitals) were identified within 90 days of the BSA value and stratified by BSA category.

RESULTS

Among eligible patients (N = 5120), mean age was 51.4 years and 49.3% were women. The majority of patients (78.9%) were treated with any topical. Proportions of patients with BSA < 3%, 3-10%, and > 10% were 23.4%, 41.9%, and 34.6%, respectively; proportions with 0, 1, and 2+ special areas were 21.6%, 31.6%, and 45.7%, respectively; and 44.4%, 45.7%, and 45.9% of patients with BSA < 3%, 3-10%, and > 10%, respectively, had 2+ special areas.

CONCLUSION

The IPC classification can likely identify many more patients who may benefit from systemic therapy than BSA alone.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of cedirogant from phase I studies in healthy participants and patients with chronic plaque psoriasis

Cedirogant is an inverse agonist of retinoic acid-related orphan receptor gamma thymus (RORγt) developed for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Here, we report the results from two phase I studies in which the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of cedirogant in healthy participants and patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis were evaluated. The studies consisted of single (20-750 mg) and multiple (75-375 mg once-daily [q.d.]) ascending dose designs, with effect of food and itraconazole on cedirogant exposure also evaluated. Safety and PK were evaluated for both healthy participants and psoriasis patients, and efficacy was assessed in psoriasis patients. Following single and multiple doses, cedirogant mean terminal half-life ranged from 16 to 28 h and median time to reach maximum plasma concentration ranged from 2 to 5 h across both populations. Cedirogant plasma exposures were dose-proportional after single doses and less than dose-proportional from 75 to 375 mg q.d. doses. Steady-state concentrations were achieved within 12 days. Accumulation ratios ranged from approximately 1.2 to 1.8 across tested doses. Food had minimal effect and itraconazole had limited impact on cedirogant exposure. No discontinuations or serious adverse events due to cedirogant were recorded. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Self-Assessment of Psoriasis Symptoms (SAPS) assessments demonstrated numerical improvement with treatment of cedirogant 375 mg q.d. compared with placebo. The PK, safety, and efficacy profiles of cedirogant supported advancing it to phase II clinical trial in psoriasis patients.

Use of systemic and biological therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis are candidates for systemic treatment, but it is unknown how many receive such therapy at a national level in Denmark.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the prevalence of conventional systemic therapy use in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and, further, to investigate the time to discontinuation of conventional systemic therapy and initiation of biological therapy among biologic-naïve patients.

METHODS

This registry-based study identified a cohort of patients with psoriasis in Denmark. We estimated the prevalence of moderate-to-severe psoriasis at a national level using registry data. Inverse probability weighting was used to mitigate potential selection bias in the prevalence estimate of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Analyses were then performed on the weighted cohort.

RESULTS

Of patients with psoriasis in Denmark, 10.9% were estimated to have moderate-to-severe psoriasis, of whom 62.3% received either conventional systemic or biological therapy, meaning 37.7% who were considered candidates for systemic therapy did not receive any systemic treatment. The study demonstrated that, comparing previous time periods with more recent years: (i) time on conventional systemic therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis has become shorter, with a median (interquartile range) of 3.0 years (0.6-10.0) in 1985-1994 vs. 0.6 years (0.3-2.0) in 2014-2018; (ii) more patients initiated biologics as second-line therapy, with 69.5% in 2010-2013 vs. 71.2% in 2014-2018; and (iii) the median time from initiation of systemic therapy to initiation of biological therapy decreased from 13.3 years (11.5-16.8) in 2010-2013 to 1.9 years (1.7-2.4) in 2014-2018.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that nearly 37.7% of Danish patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis do not receive systemic treatment even though they would qualify for this. Furthermore, for patients treated with conventional systemics, drug survival decreased during the observation period.

Estimation of patients with psoriasis potentially eligible and currently untreated with biological drugs in Italy

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis (PSO) patients can benefit from the growing availability of novel biological agents, that are often underused or discontinued. This real-world analysis estimated PSO patients potentially eligible and currently untreated with biologics in Italy.

METHODS

An observational analysis was performed on administrative databases of a pool of healthcare entities, covering 11.3% of Italian population. During the inclusion period (2010- 2020), patients were identified by: 1) at least one prescription of topical drugs for PSO; or 2) active exemption for PSO; or 3) at least one PSO hospital discharge diagnosis. The index-date was the first PSO identification across inclusion period. Eligibility for biologics was evaluated prior to index-date (characterization period) through two not-mutually exclusive criteria: Criterion A, failure of at least one systemic treatment, and/or Criterion B, onset of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Data were re-proportioned to the Italian population.

RESULTS

The study sample showed a PSO prevalence of 2%. Projection to 2020 national population (N=59,236.213) estimated 1.43 million Italian patients affected by PSO: 95% treated with conventional therapies, 4% with biologics, and 1% untreated. Among those non-treated with biologics, 3.8% of overall PSO patients met one or both eligibility criteria for biologics, specifically 25% met criterion A (failure to conventional treatments), 68% criterion B (PsA co-diagnosis), and 7% met both. About half of them had 1 or 2 comorbidities and 30% above 3.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings from real clinical practice estimated about 4% PSO patients potentially eligible for biologics, but still untreated, with nearly one-third exhibiting a complex comorbidity profile.

Association of psoriasis and stroke in end-stage renal disease patients

BACKGROUND

Previous research in the general population suggests that the inflammatory skin disease psoriasis is associated with an increased risk of vascular events, such as stroke. Thus, psoriasis may also represent a risk factor for stroke in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.

METHODS

We queried the United States Renal Data System for incident dialysis patients between 2004 and 2015. Psoriasis was defined as having at least two international classification of disease (ICD)-9 or ICD-10 diagnosis codes. ICD codes were also used to query the outcome of interest, stroke, as well as other clinical risk factors. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of psoriasis and other risk factors with stroke.

RESULTS

Of 966,399 ESRD patients, we identified 89,700 (9.3%) subjects with stroke and 6,286 (0.7%) with psoriasis. Of these psoriasis patients, 796 (0.9%) also had a stroke. Psoriasis was associated with an increased risk of stroke in an unadjusted model [odds ratio (OR)=1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.08-1.25]. However, after controlling for demographic and clinical risk factors, the final adjusted model showed that psoriasis was not associated with stroke (OR=0.96, CI=0.88-1.04). Congestive heart failure [adjusted OR of 1.79 (CI=1.75-1.83)] was a confounder of the association of psoriasis with stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to prior research in the general population, psoriasis in ESRD patients was not associated with the risk of stroke after controlling for various demographic and clinical parameters. Our finding emphasizes the importance of controlling for a variety of factors in population studies examining associations of diseases and risk factors.

Roflumilast 0.3% Cream: a Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Plaque psoriasis is a chronic dermatologic autoimmune disease that affects adults and children. Roflumilast 0.3% cream is currently the only topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor indicated for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in patients 12 years or older.

PHARMACODYNAMICS AND PHARMACOKINETICS

Roflumilast inhibits phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor enzyme leading to the accumulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, which suppresses the inflammatory mediators interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α. Roflumilast, applied once daily, reaches steady state by day 15 and has a half life of approximately 4 days in adults. Roflumilast undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism by cytochrome P450 enzymes and conjugation. Roflumilast is 99% bound to plasma proteins.

CLINICAL TRIALS

Roflumilast efficacy and safety were evaluated in the DERMIS-1 and DERMIS-2 clinical trials. These identically designed, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 3 trials randomized 881 patients to roflumilast 0.3% cream or vehicle, applied once daily for 8 weeks. In DERMIS-1, the Investigator Global Assessment success rate was 42.4% with roflumilast 0.3% cream compared with 6.1% with the vehicle (32.3%-46.9%; P <0.001). Similarly, in DERMIS-2, the Investigator Global Assessment success rate was 37.5% with roflumilast 0.3% cream compared with 6.9% with the vehicle (20.8%-36.9%; P <0.001). Of 881 participants, 1% discontinued treatment with roflumilast cream due to adverse reactions compared with 1.3% treated with vehicle. Urticaria at the application site (0.3%) was the most common adverse reaction that led to discontinuation of roflumilast.

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCE

To date, topical corticosteroids are the most commonly used agents to treat mild plaque psoriasis. Sensitive areas are often challenging to treat with existing topical therapy, including corticosteroids. Topical roflumilast has shown to be effective in treating sensitive areas, including skin folds, and may be an alternative to systemic therapy for some patients. The Food and Drug Administration approved topical roflumilast for the treatment of plaque psoriasis, including intertriginous areas, for patients 12 years or older.

Epidemiology of Psoriasis in Portugal: A Population-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, and inflammatory skin disorder with a high personal, social and economic burden and important implications for healthcare systems. The aim of this study was to provide an epidemiological characterization of individuals with psoriasis in Portugal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A large observational, cross-sectional, nationwide, population-based survey study developed by the Portuguese Psoriasis Group of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology (GPP-SPDV). A structured questionnaire was designed and applied by experienced interviewers to a random, representative sample of Portuguese individuals with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. Patients were considered to have psoriasis if they replied positively to one of the following questions: "Does any physician have ever diagnosed you with psoriasis?" or "Do you have a skin disorder characterized by scaling, reddish skin lesions located in the elbows/knees/scalp?".

RESULTS

A total of 6381 individuals were interviewed, of which 283 met the criteria for psoriasis, corresponding to a prevalence rate of 4.4% (95% CI 3.95 - 4.98). Out of the participants that met psoriasis criteria, 24% had suggestive signs/symptoms but did not have a clinical diagnosis established and were not being monitored by a physician. Although more than 70% of participants had active disease (scaling, erythema, or pruritus) and one third had joint symptoms, only 12% were on systemic treatment. Fifty percent of participants with psoriasis (n = 139) had relevant comorbidities (most frequently depression/anxiety and cardiometabolic diseases). Sixteen percent of participants with psoriasis (n = 46) reported that psoriasis interfered with their daily activities (median impact of 5 in a 0 - 10 scale) and 12% mentioned the disease had an impact in their sexual life (median impact of 5 in a 0 - 10 scale).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the prevalence rate of psoriasis is likely to be high in Portugal, and several gaps exist at different levels of healthcare delivery to these patients, from diagnosis to treatment. This study provides important data for the future planning of interventions targeting the improvement of psoriasis care in Portugal.

Suboptimal Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients with Psoriasis Undertreated with Oral Therapies: International Physician and Patient Survey

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated disease. This study assessed the time at which patients switched from a conventional oral systemic treatment to a biologic therapy; patient clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes associated with oral systemic treatments; and the proportion of patients who persisted on oral therapy (nonswitchers), despite reported suboptimal clinical and QoL outcomes.

METHODS

This data analysis used the Adelphi Real World Psoriasis Disease Specific Programme, a non-interventional, retrospective, cross-sectional survey conducted in the USA, France, Germany, and United Kingdom (August 2018-April 2019). Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis assessed switching from oral to biologic therapy in patients treated ≥ 3 years at survey completion (n = 597). The severity of psoriasis was reported by physicians as the percentage of body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores were calculated for three groups: nonswitchers who met treatment failure criteria, nonswitchers who did not meet failure criteria, and switchers to a biologic therapy.

RESULTS

In KM analysis, approximately 50% of the patient population switched by 24 months. A substantial portion of nonswitchers continued to have moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Among nonswitchers, 57-77% had BSA ≥ 3% and 16-24% had BSA ≥ 10% at the time of the survey compared with 37% of switchers who had BSA of ≥ 3% and 9% who had BSA of ≥ 10%. QoL was poor among nonswitchers. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] DLQI scores for nonswitchers meeting treatment failure criteria, nonswitchers not meeting failure criteria, and switchers were 6.11 (4.55), 2.62 (3.29), and 2.25 (4.23), respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is a clear unmet need for more effective oral therapies, and further research into the reasons for patients remaining undertreated, which may include patient preference for oral treatments (despite lack of response), contraindications, or insurance/formulary-related barriers to access, are needed.

Association of psoriasis with myocardial infarction in end-stage renal disease patients

BACKGROUND

Previous research in non-dialysis patients suggests that the inflammatory skin disease psoriasis is associated with an increased risk of severe vascular events like myocardial infarction (MI). Thus, we determined whether psoriasis represents a significant risk factor for MI in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.

METHODS

We queried the United States Renal Data System for ESRD patients starting dialysis between 2004 and 2015. ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were used to identify those with at least two diagnoses of psoriasis, a diagnosis of MI, and other clinical risk factors. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of psoriasis and various risk factors with MI.

RESULTS

Of a cohort of 1,062,693, we identified 6823 (0.6%) subjects with psoriasis and 181,960 (17.1%) with MI. Of the 6823 patients with psoriasis, 1671 (24%) developed an MI. Psoriasis was associated with an increased risk of MI in an unadjusted model [odds ratio (OR) = 1.34; confidence interval (CI) = 1.26-1.42]. However, after controlling for demographics, dialysis modality, access type, and various conditions related to the Charlson Comorbidity Index, psoriasis was not associated with MI (OR = 0.95, CI = 0.89-1.01). Confounders of the association of psoriasis with MI included congestive heart failure (OR = 5.26, CI = 5.17-5.36), pulmonary disease (OR = 1.25, CI = 1.23-1.26), and diabetes with complications (OR = 1.82, CI = 1.79-1.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to prior research in the general population, in the ESRD population psoriasis was not associated with an increased risk of MI after controlling for various demographic and clinical parameters. These data emphasize the importance of an integrated approach since comorbidities may influence the choice of therapy for psoriasis and outcomes.

Impact of Season and Other Factors on Initiation, Discontinuation, and Switching of Systemic Drug Therapy in Patients with Psoriasis: A Retrospective Study

This study investigated whether systemic drug prescribing for psoriasis varies by season and other exacerbating factors. Eligible patients with psoriasis were assessed for each season for initiation, discontinuation, and switching of systemic drugs. A total of 360,787 patients were at risk of initiating any systemic drugs in 2016‒2019; 39,572 patients and 35,388 patients were at risk of drug discontinuation or switching to a biologic and a nonbiologic systemic drug, respectively. The initiation of biologic therapy in 2016‒2019 peaked in spring (1.28%), followed by summer (1.11%), fall (1.08%), and winter (1.01%). Nonbiologic systemic drugs followed a similar pattern. Those aged 30‒39 years, male, those with psoriatic arthritis, those who live in the South region, those who live in areas with lower altitudes, and those who live in areas with lower humidity had higher initiation with the same seasonality pattern. Discontinuation of biologic drugs peaked in summer, and switching of biologics was highest in spring. Season is associated with initiation, discontinuation, and switching, although seasonality pattern is less clear for nonbiologic systemic drugs. Approximately 14,280 more patients with psoriasis in the United States are estimated to initiate a biologic in spring than in other seasons, and over 840 more biologic users switched in spring than in winter. The findings may provide evidence for healthcare resource planning in psoriasis management.

Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 Program fOr Evaluation of TYK2 inhibitor psoriasis second trial

BACKGROUND

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, inhibits cytokine signaling in psoriasis pathogenesis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to demonstrate deucravacitinib superiority versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis based on ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline at week 16.

METHODS

POETYK psoriasis second trial (NCT03611751), a 52-week, double-blinded, phase 3 trial, randomized patients 2:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg every day (n = 511), placebo (n = 255), or apremilast 30 mg twice a day (n = 254).

RESULTS

At week 16, significantly more deucravacitinib-treated patients versus placebo and apremilast patients achieved ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (53.0% vs 9.4% and 39.8%; P < .0001 vs placebo; P = .0004 vs apremilast) and static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (49.5% vs 8.6% and 33.9%; P < .0001 for both). Efficacy was maintained until week 52 with continuous deucravacitinib. The most frequent adverse event with deucravacitinib was nasopharyngitis. Serious adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events were infrequent. No clinically meaningful changes were observed in laboratory parameters.

LIMITATIONS

The study duration was 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Deucravacitinib demonstrated superiority versus placebo and apremilast and was well tolerated in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with systemic therapy in Japan: A retrospective claims database study

The real-world treatment landscape for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving systemic therapies in Japan is not well understood. This study describes the demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and psoriasis-associated costs in these patients. This retrospective observational study used data from the Japan Medical Data Center database between January 2016 and December 2020. Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of psoriasis, ≥1 claim for a systemic treatment of interest, medical history for ≥6 months, and follow-up data for ≥12 months. Systemic therapies comprised biologics (tumor necrosis factor and interleukin inhibitors) and oral treatments (a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, immunosuppressants, and vitamin A). Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were evaluated. The study identified 1770 patients satisfying all inclusion criteria. The mean age was 49.0 years, with 68% of patients aged 20-54 years. Overall, 90.6% and 9.4% of patients received oral medications and biologics as index treatment, respectively. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were assessed for treatments received by ≥20 patients (n = 1730). During the 12-month follow-up period, 1102/1730 patients (63.7%) discontinued index treatment, of whom 9.9% switched to alternative systemic treatments. The persistence rate was ≥70% for most biologics and <50% for oral systemic treatments. All 1730 patients had ≥1 all-cause outpatient visit (2.0 visits per person per month) and hospitalization frequency was ≤0.01 per person per month. Persistent patients incurred inflation-adjusted costs of Japanese Yen (JPY) 88 667 per person per month. Treatment switching was associated with an increase in total cost: JPY 128 039 per person per month after switching versus JPY 117 504 before switching. This study of Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis demonstrated low persistence, high discontinuation, and low rates of treatment switching with systemic therapies. Switching was associated with increased total cost. These results indicate unmet needs for new treatments.

Treatment Patterns for Targeted Therapies, Non-Targeted Therapies, and Drug Holidays in Patients with Psoriasis

Introduction

We aimed to evaluate US treatment patterns and, more specifically, switch patterns among patients with psoriasis (PsO) who initiated treatment with targeted therapy (TT) and subsequently switched to another therapy.

Methods

This retrospective study used IBM^® MarketScan^® Commercial and Medicare Databases (1/1/2006–3/31/2020) to evaluate treatment patterns in biologic- and apremilast-naive patients with PsO. TT included apremilast, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, ustekinumab, or other biologics (certolizumab pegol, secukinumab, brodalumab, ixekizumab, guselkumab, or tildrakizumab). Adults with ≥ 1 prescription for a TT, ≥ 2 PsO claims separated by ≥ 1 day on or before the index date (date of first TT prescription), and continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment for 1 year before and 2 years after the index date were eligible. Non-targeted therapy (NTT) was defined as non-targeted oral systemic treatment, topical treatment, phototherapy, or no treatment. Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis was used to estimate time to reinitiation of TT (24-month continuous enrollment post-index was not required).

Results

A total of 11,526 patients with PsO were included; mean [standard deviation (SD)] age and Charlson Comorbidity Index score were 48.3 (12.8) years and 0.9 (1.43), respectively. During the follow-up, 69.2% of the patients were treated with NTT. Median time to first NTT, for those who received NTT, was 205 days (longest: adalimumab, 252 days). Among patients who switched to NTT after initiating treatment with TT, 52.6% reinitiated treatment with TT (least common: apremilast, 45.6%), with a median time to reinitiation of 106 days (longest: other biologics, 136 days). For all patients on NTT, the probability of reinitiating any TT was 60.7% at 24 months.

Conclusions

PsO treatment is often cyclical in nature. Patients frequently experience drug holidays or transition back to TT after using NTT. The consideration of real-world treatment patterns in future economic models may provide new insights into the clinical effectiveness and value of PsO treatments.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects 3.0% of adults or an estimated 7.56 million Americans. The most common type of psoriasis is called plaque psoriasis because of its appearance with red patches and silvery scales on the skin. A major concern of medical providers is that not all patients continue their treatment as prescribed. Many patients discontinue, switch, and often restart treatment. To develop effective psoriasis treatment plans for shared decision-making among medical providers and patients, it is important to look at how treatments are used in the real world. This can be done by conducting studies using insurance claims data from healthcare insurance providers. In this study, we evaluated treatment patterns and, more specifically, patterns in changes of treatment in US patients who began their psoriasis treatment with a targeted therapy (biologics or apremilast) and then changed to another therapy. We found that patients often took drug holidays (days with no treatment) and returned back to using a targeted therapy after using a non-targeted therapy (e.g., other oral therapy, topical treatment, phototherapy, or no treatment). Findings from this real-world study may support future studies on the clinical effectiveness and value of current and future treatments for psoriasis—especially within these targeted to non-targeted transitions.

Utilization Trends and Impact of Secukinumab Treatment on Clinical Outcomes in Biologic-Naive Patients with Psoriasis in a US Real-World Setting

INTRODUCTION

Real-world evidence has demonstrated the effectiveness of secukinumab in the treatment of psoriasis; however, limited data are available on patient profiles of US secukinumab initiators over time and clinical outcomes in biologic-naive patients. This study describes clinical characteristics of secukinumab initiators by year, and the clinical outcomes in patients after 6- and/or 12-month follow-up visits, stratified by prior biologic use.

METHODS

This observational study included patients enrolled in the CorEvitas (formerly Corrona) Psoriasis Registry. Analyses were conducted in two patient cohorts: (1) all secukinumab initiators, stratified by year, and (2) those who initiated and maintained secukinumab through a 6- and/or 12-month follow-up visit. For all secukinumab initiators, patient characteristics at initiation were described per calendar year; in initiators with follow-up visits, mean (SD) differences in percentage affected body surface area (BSA), five-point Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores between baseline and follow-up visits were calculated. Analyses were conducted separately for biologic-naive and biologic-experienced patients.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2020, the proportion of secukinumab initiators in the registry who were biologic-naive increased each year from 12.5% to 49.7%. Overall, 1518 patients initiated secukinumab at or after enrollment; 980 (64.6%) were biologic experienced, and 538 (35.4%) were biologic naive. At 6 months, biologic-experienced and biologic-naive patients reported mean (SD) decreases in BSA (-9.3 [14.5] versus -11.7 [16.6]), IGA (-1.4 [1.3] versus -1.7 [1.4]), and PASI (-5.2 [6.6] versus -6.7 [7.8]). The proportion of patients with an IGA score of clear/almost clear (0/1) increased over fivefold, irrespective of biologic experience. At 12 months, similar improvements were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of biologic-naive secukinumab initiators increased over time. Biologic-naive patients demonstrated similar improvements in clinical outcomes compared with biologic-experienced patients, suggesting that secukinumab may be considered as a first-line therapy for psoriasis.

Sharing Patient and Clinician Experiences of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Nationwide Italian Survey and Expert Opinion to Explore Barriers Impacting upon Patient Wellbeing

A nationwide survey was conducted in adult patients with psoriasis (PsO) across Italy to obtain their real-world perspective of the impact of PsO on their wellbeing. Patients completed a 26-question survey (based on the patient benefit index; PBI, The Dermatology Life Quality Index; DLQI and the World Health Organization-five; WHO-5 wellbeing index) and workshop discussion sessions were undertaken by dermatologists to interpret results from the survey. 392 patients with PsO completed the survey. Analysis of results was restricted to patients who had moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (assessed by patients; n = 252; 64.3%). Dermatologists (n = 32) completed one question from the survey related to wellbeing and rated social, physical and mental domains as contributing to a similar extent, with comparable scores also observed by patients. For treatment, biologics yielded higher scores on average, whereas little difference was observed between topical and conventional systemic treatments. Only 23.8% of patients felt that their dermatologist was taking into consideration their wellbeing and 32.6% of the patients considered their therapy as inadequate in improving signs and symptoms of the disease. This survey identified key factors contributing to barriers impacting on patient wellbeing. Simple, but comprehensive questionnaires can provide important insight to patients’ needs that may significantly increase clinician awareness during visits leading to tailored treatment.

Cost-utility and budget impact analysis of adding-on apremilast to biologic therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, an Iranian payer perspective

Background and purpose:

Plaque psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease with skin manifestations that affect the patients’ quality of life negatively. The prevalence of psoriasis is approximately 2-3% worldwide and appears to be still on the increase. Due to the stigma problems, psoriasis has a significant effect on one’s life that is often overlooked. The current study aimed to conduct the cost-utility evaluation and budget impact analysis of adding-on apremilast ahead of biologic therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The psoriatic patients who did not undergo the conventional systemic therapy were eligible to enter the defined sequences.

Experimental approach:

An excel-based Markov model with 40 cycles of 3 months, each of which was adopted to compare the outcomes of each exclusively administered sequence in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Two exclusive therapeutic sequences were considered. In the first sequence, apremilast was followed by biologics and in the second one, biologics were administered initially without apremilast. The results were extrapolated up to 10 years. The designed Markov model was also used in budget impact analysis. The cost-saving potential of the new treatment was accounted for the next 5 years.

Findings/Results:

Incremental cost and incremental effect were reported in the base case scenario. Using the sequence consisting apremilast provided an additional 0.10 quality-adjusted life years and decreased total costs by about 11,100 USD per patient. These results were in line with the findings from sensitivity analysis. The cost-saving over 5 years is estimated to be around 30 million dollars for the Iran market following the use of the new treatment.

Conclusion and implications:

In the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, apremilast supplementation prior to biological treatments is more cost-effective than biological treatment alone.

Are Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Undertreated? A Population-Based Study from Southern Italy

This study aimed to explore the pattern of use of different treatment lines in psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients from Southern Italy. A retrospective cohort study was performed during the years 2010–2018 using data from the Caserta Local Health Unit (LHU) claims database. All of the PsO or PsA patients were identified. The proportion of PsO/PsA patients untreated or treated with ≥1 drug classes (i.e., non-disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (non-DMARDs), conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), biological drugs (bDMARDs) or targeted synthetic small molecules (tsDMARDs)) was calculated in the years 2016–2018. Among the bDMARD users, the median times from the first registered PsO/PsA diagnosis/from the first csDMARD to the first bDMARD were calculated. Overall, 10,296 (1.1%) and 1724 (0.2%) PsO and PsA patients were identified. More than half of the PsO patients (N = 5301; 51.6%) and 15% of the PsA patients (N = 251) were not treated with any drug. A very low proportion of PsO patients (N = 121; 1.2%) received csDMARDs/bDMARDs dispensing. Instead, 538 (32.2%) PsA patients were treated with bDMARDs. The median times from the first diagnosis to the first bDMARD dispensing were 54.0 (Q1–Q3: 30.5–72.2) and 13.3 (Q1–Q3: 3.1–43.9) months in the PsO and PsA patients, respectively. The median time from the first csDMARD to the first bDMARD dispensing was shorter in the PsO [9.2 months (Q1–Q3: 5.5–30.0)] than in the PsA [14.5 months (Q1–Q3: 8.6–33.5)] patients. A potential undertreatment of PsO (much less for PsA) in an LHU from Southern Italy, with a particularly low use of more recently marketed drugs, such as biological ones, was shown.

Treatment of psoriasis in end-stage renal disease patients is associated with decreased mortality: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis impairs the quality of life of approximately 7.5 million Americans and is associated with serious comorbidities. Because of chronic vascular access and epidermal dysfunction, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with psoriasis may be at greater risk for infection, and psoriasis treatment could affect this risk.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the United States Renal Data System from 2004-2011 to investigate the association of psoriasis with infections common to ESRD patients, as well as the effect of psoriasis treatment on infection risk as well as mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 8,911 psoriasis patients were identified. Psoriasis was associated with a significantly increased risk for all queried infections, especially cellulitis (adjusted relative risk = 1.55), conjunctivitis (1.47), and onychomycosis (1.36). Psoriasis treatment (systemic, local, and light) was associated with a significantly decreased risk of some infections. Psoriasis treatment was also correlated with a significantly decreased risk of mortality, with systemic therapies (biologics and other immunosuppressants) showing the greatest reduction (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that psoriasis-ESRD patients may have an increased risk of infection and treatment of psoriasis is associated with a reduced risk of some infections and improved survival.

Topical calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a drug evaluation

Introduction: Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease affecting approximately 3.2% of adults in the United States. The mainstay treatment for mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis (the most common subtype and severity) is topical therapy.Areas covered:The fixed combination calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate (BD) is an effective topical treatment for plaque psoriasis. Two therapies with separate actions - a Vitamin D analog and a high-potency topical corticosteroid - combined into a single medication allows for better efficacy and patient adherence. The treatment is available in ointment, gel, suspension, foam, and cream formulations. The authors elaborate on this and provide their expert perspectives.Expert opinion: Combination calcipotriol/BD offers several advantages over its separate product monotherapies, including better efficacy, safety, and ease of use. Newer calcipotriol/BD formulations include less messy vehicles, thus promoting improved adherence. Further data are needed on whether combination calcipotriol/BD will be cost-effective and whether insurers will place it in the treatment coverage algorithm. Due to its higher price, calcipotriol/BD will likely remain a second-line treatment option after generic topical corticosteroids.

Topical medications for chronic plaque psoriasis: A 3-year longitudinal study in France

Topical treatments are first-line therapies, prescribed to most patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. This non-interventional, longitudinal study examined data regarding the treatment pathways of French patients with psoriasis vulgaris using a pharmacy database. From this database, patients with an initial prescription of a topical treatment of interest (ie, calcipotriol alone and/or calcipotriol/betamethasone) between March and October 2013 were included in the study. The primary objective was to capture the switch from a topical treatment, from treatment initiation to receipt of a systemic therapy over a period of 3 years. A total of 26 605 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 58.5 years. The majority of patients (94.7%) maintained topical treatment during the 3 years, receiving a mean of 1.1 different therapies. Of 1400 patients who switched to a systemic therapy, 93.1% switched to a non-biological (mean time to switching >400 days), maintaining this for the remainder of the follow-up period. The most commonly prescribed first non-biological systemic therapy was methotrexate (37%). Less than 1% of patients switched to a biological therapy during follow up. Cohort analyses suggest that patients progressing to use of a systemic therapy within 12 months were those with more severe disease. There was a low rate of transition from topical to systemic therapies in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis during the first 3 years of treatment, suggesting stability of disease severity over time with topical therapy alone, potentially due to good patient adherence.

Treat-to-Target Approach for the Management of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Consensus Recommendations

Introduction

Treat-to-target strategies are used in several chronic diseases to improve outcomes. Treatment goals have also been suggested for psoriasis, but there is currently no consensus on targets, and guidance is needed to implement this strategy in clinical practice. The project ‘Treat to Target Italia’ was launched by a scientific board (SB) of 10 psoriasis experts to generate expert consensus recommendations.

Methods

On the basis of the published literature, their clinical experience, and the results of a survey among Italian dermatologists, the SB identified four relevant topics: (1) clinical remission; (2) quality of life; (3) abrogation of systemic inflammation; (4) safety. They drafted 20 statements addressing these four topics and submitted them to a panel of 28 dermatologists, in a Delphi process, to achieve consensus (greater than 80% agreement).

Results

Consensus was reached on all statements. Treatment goals defining clinical remission should include a 90% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90 response) or an absolute PASI score of less than or equal to 3. Patient’s quality of life and satisfaction are important targets. If PASI targets are achieved, there should be no or very low impact of psoriasis on quality of life [Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score less than or equal to 3]. If PASI or DLQI goals are not achieved within 3–4 months, treatment should be changed. Abrogation of systemic inflammation may be crucial for preventing or delaying inflammatory comorbidities. Safety is an equally important target as efficacy.

Conclusion

These 20 consensus statements define the parameters of a treat-to-target strategy for psoriasis in Italy. It is hoped that use of these in the management of patients with psoriasis will improve treatment outcomes and patient health-related quality of life.

Gaps in moderate plaque psoriasis management: A survey of Saudi dermatologists

Background:

There are many barriers that usually lead to under-treatment of moderate psoriasis patients, with subsequent unsatisfactory results and clinical outcomes.

Objective:

Given this lack of consistent guidelines on treating moderate plaque psoriasis patients, the aim of the current study is to define how Saudi dermatologists define and treat such cases in the real-world clinical setting.

Methods:

We conducted an online cross-sectional survey from May 2020 to October 2020, involving all eligible dermatologists working at different academic, governmental, and private sectors in Saudi Arabia.

Results:

Finally, a total of 260 dermatologists were included in the final analysis; out of them, 140 (53.8%) were males and 120 (46.2%) were females. Regarding the tools used by participating dermatologists for diagnosis of moderate psoriasis, most of the participants (86.5%) used Body Surface Area (BSA), 7.3% used Physician Global Assessment (PGA), and 6.2% used Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Cutoff scores for defining moderate psoriasis varied widely among surveyed dermatologists. The surveyed dermatologists reported that 46% of their patients with moderate plaque psoriasis were receiving biologics as their primary therapy, while 24.1% were receiving prescription topical treatment, 20.3% were receiving an oral systemic therapy, 4.9% were using over-the-counter topical treatment, and 4.7% were receiving phototherapy.

Conclusion:

There is a pervasive lack of consensus regarding the definition of moderate psoriasis, with reported wide ranges among the commonly used severity tools in psoriasis patients.

The Budget Impact of Introducing Tildrakizumab to a United States Health Plan for Managing Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the budget impact of introducing tildrakizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis from a US health plan perspective.

METHODS

A budget impact model estimated costs before and after the adoption of tildrakizumab to a hypothetical US health plan with 1 million covered lives over 5 years. Additionally, the model included adalimumab, brodalumab, etanercept, guselkumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab, and apremilast; biosimilars were not included. Model input data were obtained from the published literature, clinical trials, and prescription data. Market uptake for tildrakizumab was assumed as 1% annually over 5 years. Patients initiating or switching treatments required induction dosing; all others treated required maintenance dosing. The model compared the total annual costs for tildrakizumab versus treatment without tildrakizumab to calculate budget impact in 2018 US dollars. Scenarios exploring alternative assumptions for adverse events and market uptake rates were assessed, and a one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Within a health plan of 1 million members with an estimated 1048 patients receiving biologics or apremilast for psoriasis, the total annual health plan cost after introducing tildrakizumab decreased by $5585, $137,025, $205,538, $274,051, and $342,563 in years 1-5, respectively, resulting in a cumulative reduction of $964,763 over 5 years. The impact on total cost was largely due to drug acquisition costs. The incremental per member per month (PMPM) cost reductions were negligible in year 1, $0.01 in year 2, $0.02 in years 3-4, and $0.03 in year 5. Scenario and sensitivity analyses confirmed the model robustness.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of tildrakizumab with a 1% annual uptake over 5 years has the potential to reduce the cost of treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis for a US health plan.

Differential characteristics and treatment of psoriasis patients by economic status in South Korea: An analysis of the National Health Insurance Database

Despite the enormous burden on patients with severe psoriasis, their utilization of medical care is not well understood in Korea.To compare the characteristics and treatment patterns of psoriasis patients by economic status as well as to examine the factors influencing systemic treatments of psoriasis.We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study using National Health Insurance sample cohort data in 2015. Psoriasis patients were classified as either the "topical treatment only" or the "systemic treatment" group based on the types of treatment. Patients' economic status was defined by the deciles of health insurance premium, which was determined based on income and assets. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the factors influencing systemic treatments of psoriasis.We identified 6041 psoriasis patients; 39.5% were in the bottom 5 deciles of health insurance premium and 60.5% were in the top 5 deciles. Only 1.9% of the low economic status group and 4.0% of the high economic status group were treated with expensive biologics, although the difference was not statistically significant.Overall, psoriasis patients with higher economic status had a lower likelihood of receiving systemic treatments but had a higher probability of being treated with expensive biologics.

Optimizing the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis in Older Adults

Psoriasis is a lifelong disease and its prevalence in older adults continues to increase as the population ages. Therefore, it is important for physicians to understand the management of the disease in this population. While the management of psoriasis in older adults is similar to the management of patients below the age of 65 years, there are special considerations when treating older patients. Older patients may have more comorbidities, more immunosuppression, and are often taking additional medications that can interact with those being used to treat psoriasis. Safer and more effective treatment options for psoriasis have been introduced in recent years, particularly injectable biological agents. Unfortunately, older patients with psoriasis are oftentimes underrepresented in the clinical trials for these new medications. Subsequent studies have focused on the safety and efficacy of these medications in older adults. The results of these studies demonstrate that biologic agents are well tolerated in older patients and are more effective in treating psoriasis than conventional systemic therapies. In addition, new small-molecule agents such as apremilast also offer an effective and safe treatment option for older patients with psoriasis. The results of these studies can help guide physicians with incorporating these newer medications into the treatment regimen of older psoriasis patients. Despite the proven safety and efficacy of biologic agents, their frequency of use in elderly patients is still almost half of that in non-elderly patients.

Treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization in palmoplantar pustulosis patients in Japan: A claims database study

Background

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory autoimmune condition, characterized by sterile pustules on the palms and soles. The treatment patterns of PPP and total health care resource utilization in Japan are not well described. Investigating these areas is needed to understand current PPP management in Japan.

Objective

To describe the characteristics, medication treatment and health care resource utilization patterns, and associated costs of PPP patients in Japan.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of insurance claims data was conducted using the Japan Medical Data Center database. Adult Patients with at least two claims with a PPP diagnosis from January 1, 2011 to March 30, 2017 and six months of follow-up after the first diagnosis were included. Patient characteristics described include age, gender, and comorbid conditions. Treatment patterns assessed include the types of treatment, sequence of treatment, and rates of discontinuation, switching, persistence and use of concomitant medications.

Results

A total of 5,162 adult patients met all inclusion criteria. Mean (SD) patient age was 49.7 (11.6) years and 43.2% were male. A total of 2441 patients (47.8%) received systemic non-biologic drugs during the entire follow up period, 2,366 (46.4%) were prescribed topical therapy, 273 (5.4%) were prescribed phototherapy, while 18 (0.4%) of patients with other autoimmune comorbidities were eligible for prescribed biologics. For treatment-naïve patients with mild PPP, topical therapy was most commonly (77.1%) prescribed, whereas in moderate to severe cases of PPP, systemic non-biologic drugs (65%) were most often used. The frequency of switching was similar (64.3% to 75.3%) across various therapies and treatment lines.

Conclusion

This study describes the treatment patterns and health care resource utilization for Japanese PPP patients using a large claims database, and highlights an unmet need to derive better treatment strategies for PPP and address disease burden in Japan.

Comparative cost-effectiveness of tildrakizumab and other commonly used treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the cost-effectiveness of tildrakizumab with other commonly used biologics and apremilast as the first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis from a US health plan's perspective.

METHODS

A 10-year cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare the incremental cost per extra month with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 response. Patients were assumed to receive one of the treatments evaluated as their first-line treatment at the outset of the analysis. Nonresponders (PASI <75) discontinued their current treatment; 25% went on to receive a mix of topical therapies, phototherapies, and other systemic therapies, while 75% received a second-line therapy before receiving a mix of topical therapies, phototherapies, and other systemic therapies. Direct medical costs were calculated based on drug acquisition, administration, and monitoring costs.

RESULTS

The incremental cost per extra month a patient had a PASI 75 response was lowest for brodalumab ($3,685), infliximab ($4,102), apremilast ($4,770), and tildrakizumab ($5,150), followed by risankizumab ($5,319), secukinumab ($5,675), guselkumab ($5,784), ixekizumab ($5,900), adalimumab ($5,943), ustekinumab ($6,131), etanercept ($6,618), and certolizumab pegol ($13,476).

CONCLUSION

Tildrakizumab was among the most cost-effective first-line treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis and was more cost-effective than risankizumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, etanercept, and certolizumab pegol.

Depression and sleep quality in psoriatic patients: impact of psoriasis severity

Background: Psoriatic patients often display depression and sleep disturbances. In previous research, we found high rates of depression and poor sleep quality among psoriatic patients, unrelated to psoriasis severity. However, these results referred to a sample mainly composed of patients under remission.Aim: To compared the prevalence of depression and sleep disturbances in patients suffering from mild versus moderate-tosevere plaque psoriasis, also investigating the association between psoriasis severity and psychopathological variables.KeypointsPsoriasis affects the patients' psychophysical health.Depressive symptoms and/or sleep disturbances are frequent among psoriatic patients.This study investigates these issues comparing the sub-populations of mild and moderate-to-severe psoriatic patients, with special attention to the association between sleep and pruritus.In clinical practice, the link between psychopathological disturbances and psoriasis should not be underestimated.

Recommendations for Initiating Systemic Therapy in Patients with Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory disease that is often associated with serious comorbid conditions such as cardiovascular disease, obesity, and diabetes. Many patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receive either no treatment or receive topical therapy only and report dissatisfaction with treatment, poorly managed symptoms, and continued impact of the disease on quality of life. Patients currently receiving topical monotherapy can benefit from systemic therapies, which are more effective in reducing clinical symptoms, achieving treatment efficacy targets, and improving quality of life. An array of systemic treatment options with varying mechanisms of action are available, including conventional and newer oral systemic agents and biologics. Each option presents a unique set of benefits, safety risks, dosing schedules, and monitoring requirements. The aim of the current review is to better optimize treatment outcomes in patients with psoriasis by presenting a rationale for when to consider systemic therapy in this patient population. The authors discuss the barriers to use of systemic agents and highlight the central importance of each patient's perspective when assessing disease severity. Additionally, practical strategies for selecting and safely initiating systemic therapy to optimize the treatment of patients with psoriasis are identified.

Clinical Goals and Barriers to Effective Psoriasis Care

Engaging global key opinion leaders, the International Psoriasis Council (IPC) held a day-long roundtable discussion with the primary purpose to discuss the treatment goals of psoriasis patients and worldwide barriers to optimal care. Setting clear expectations might ultimately encourage undertreated psoriasis patients to seek care in an era in which great gains in therapeutic efficacy have been achieved. Here, we discuss the option for early treatment of all categories of psoriasis to alleviate disease impact while emphasizing the need for more focused attention for psoriasis patients with mild and moderate forms of this autoimmune disease. In addition, we encourage policy changes to keep pace with the innovative therapies and clinical science and highlight the demand for greater understanding of treatment barriers in resource-poor countries.

Patient perceptions of clear/almost clear skin in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results of the Clear About Psoriasis worldwide survey

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic advances have made the achievement of clear/almost clear skin possible for many patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine patient perceptions of the impact of psoriasis and of attaining clear/almost clear skin.

METHODS

Global survey of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

RESULTS

A total of 8338 patients from 31 countries participated. The majority (57%) had not achieved self-assessed clear/almost clear skin with their current therapy, and 56% of those who had not met this goal believed it would be impossible to do so. Among the patients who had clear/almost clear skin, 73% had not initiated their current treatment until >1 year after psoriasis diagnosis, and 28% had to wait >5 years. Eighty-four percent of all respondents experienced discrimination and/or humiliation due to psoriasis, and many reported negative effects on work, intimate relationships, sleep and mental health. Patients without clear/almost clear skin reported that such achievement would open new possibilities, such as swimming (58%), a wider choice of clothing (40%), and meeting new people (26%). A limitation of this study, as with any survey-based research, is that selection and recall bias may have been present. Additionally, respondent definitions of clear/almost clear skin were subjective and may have varied.

CONCLUSION

Despite the importance of clear/almost clear skin to psoriasis patients, most are still not achieving it, and many are unaware it is possible.

Healthcare utilization and medical expenditure of Korean psoriasis patients: A descriptive result using a health insurance database

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological evidence regarding healthcare utilization and medical expenditure of patients with psoriasis in Korea is needed. To analyze the differences in healthcare utilization and financial burdens between patients with and without psoriasis and compare these patterns according to the disease severity.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study using a sample of the National Health Insurance database between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013. We included patients diagnosed with psoriasis and those with nonpsoriasis skin diseases, matched for age, sex, income, and geographical region. The patients with psoriasis were further divided into mild and moderate-to-severe psoriasis groups. Each patient was followed up for 1 year to estimate their healthcare utilization and medical expenditure since their initial diagnosis. Healthcare utilization was defined as the sum of outpatient visits and inpatient stays per person. We conducted McNemar test or Bowker test of symmetry to compare the baseline characteristics and used the Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test to compare the healthcare utilization and direct costs with a 5% significance level.

RESULTS

Our study subjects were 4016 patients with psoriasis and equally matched 4016 patients with nonpsoriasis skin diseases. Compared with patients without psoriasis, those with psoriasis had more days of healthcare service use (5.26 vs 4.19, P < .001) and higher medical expenditures within 1 year per person (209,320 vs 117,968 won, P < .001). Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis had more days of healthcare service use (12.71 vs 3.25, P < .001) and higher medical expenditures within 1 year per person (611,688 vs 107,445 won, P < .001) than those with mild psoriasis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with psoriasis had higher burdens of healthcare utilization than those without psoriasis, and patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis had the greatest burdens.