Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3b study

BACKGROUND

Scalp psoriasis is common and difficult to treat.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for the treatment of scalp psoriasis.

METHODS

In this Phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT03897088), patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis affecting the scalp (Investigator Global Assessment modified [IGA mod] 2011 [scalp] ≥3, Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index [PSSI] ≥12, ≥30% scalp surface area affected) received tildrakizumab 100 mg or placebo at W0 and W4. The primary endpoint was IGA mod 2011 (scalp) score of "clear" or "almost clear" with ≥2-point reduction from baseline at W16 (IGA mod 2011 [scalp] response). Key secondary endpoints were PSSI 90 response at W12 and W16 and IGA mod 2011 (scalp) response at W12. Safety was assessed from adverse events.

RESULTS

Of patients treated with tildrakizumab (n = 89) vs placebo (n = 82), 49.4% vs 7.3% achieved IGA mod 2011 (scalp) response at W16 (primary endpoint) and 46.1% vs 4.9% at W12; 60.7% vs 4.9% achieved PSSI 90 response at W16 and 48.3% vs 2.4% at W12 (all P <0.00001). No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred.

LIMITATIONS

Only short-term data are presented.

CONCLUSION

Tildrakizumab was efficacious for the treatment of scalp psoriasis with no new safety signals.

Tildrakizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a 52-week, real-world Portuguese multicentric study

Background

Real-world evidence plays a pivotal role in validating the efficacy of biologic drugs beyond the controlled environment of randomized trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of tildrakizumab in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis within a real-world setting over a 52-week period in Portugal.

Methods

This multicentric, prospective, observational study included adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. All participants received tildrakizumab 100 mg at weeks 0 and 4, followed by a maintenance dose every 12 weeks, and were monitored for 52 weeks. Primary endpoints were determined based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) assessments at baseline, 16 (±2) weeks, 28 (±2) weeks and 52 (±2) weeks.

Results

A total of 54 patients were enrolled in the study (56% men, mean age of 50.3 ± 14.4 years). Half of the sample (n=27) had no prior experience with biologic treatments. About 74% of patients (n=40) presented at least one comorbidity during the study, with psoriatic arthritis being the most prevalent (29.6%). By week 52, there was a significant decrease in the mean PASI from 17.8±10.3 at baseline to 1.3±1.9 (p<0.001), indicating an overall improvement of 93%. By week 52, more than 85% of patients attained PASI ≤5, more than 80% reached PASI ≤3, and nearly 60% achieved PASI ≤1. Infections were observed in 9.3% of patients, and one patient required hospitalization (1.9%). The cumulative proportion of patients continuing treatment at 52 weeks was 88.9%.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that tildrakizumab is an effective and safe agent for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in a diverse, real-world setting.

Tildrakizumab: the value of a personalized and flexible approach for treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in patients with high body weight or high disease burden

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of biologics for the treatment of plaque psoriasis is one of the major therapeutic advances of the last decades in dermatology. The efficacy of this class of drugs can be influenced by multiple factors including obesity, being overweight, prior treatment failures, and disease severity.

AREAS COVERED

Most of the currently available approved biologics are limited by their lack of dosing flexibility for adapting the therapy to the complexity of real-world patients with psoriasis. Among the class of anti-interleukin-23, tildrakizumab allows a greater dosing flexibility, increasing clinical benefits of patients with high burden of the disease or body weight >90 kg.

EXPERT OPINION

This meta-opinion discusses the clinical data that were foundational for tildrakizumab dosage flexibility, elaborates on the definition of high burden of disease specifically linked to tildrakizumab dosage, and profiles the ideal patient that could benefit from treatment with the higher approved tildrakizumab dosage of 200 mg.

Vaccination Recommendations for Adults Receiving Biologics and Oral Therapies for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Delphi Consensus from the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation

BACKGROUND

For psoriatic patients who need to receive non-live or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving non-live or live vaccines.

METHODS

Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts.

RESULTS

Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving non-live vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for non-live vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination.

LIMITATIONS

Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking.

CONCLUSION

Interruption of anti-psoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving non-live vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases.

Bimekizumab (Bimzelx) for psoriasis

The FDA has approved the injectable interleukin (IL)-17A/17F antagonist bimekizumab-bkzx (Bimzelx – UCB) for treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic treatment or phototherapy. Bimekizumab is the first IL-17A/17F antagonist to be approved in the US. It was approved in the European Union for the same indication in 2021.

Five-year safety of tildrakizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis from two phase 3 trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2): number needed to harm for occurrence of adverse events of special interest

BACKGROUND

Five-year tildrakizumab safety data have been reported as exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) of patients with events per 100 patient-years (PYs) of exposure.

OBJECTIVES

To present 5-year safety data from reSURFACE 1/2 phase 3 trials as EAIRs of events per 100 PYs of exposure, and the number needed to harm (NNH) for one adverse event of special interest (AESI) to occur.

METHODS

Pooled analysis from two randomized controlled trials in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (n = 1800). PSOLAR registry was used as safety reference data for NNH estimation.

RESULTS

Rates of AESI with tildrakizumab were comparable with rates reported in PSOLAR. The NNH for one-year severe infection occurrence was 412 with tildrakizumab 200 mg, and negative for tildrakizumab 100 mg due to lower rates in reSURFACE trials; the NNH for malignancy was 990 for one year with tildrakizumab 100 mg (negative for tildrakizumab 200 mg); and the NNH for major adverse cardiovascular events was 355 for one year with tildrakizumab 200 mg (negative for tildrakizumab 100 mg).

CONCLUSION

Tildrakizumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile over 5 years with low rates of AESI, comparable to those of the PSOLAR. Consequently, the NNH for AESI with tildrakizumab were very high or negative due to lower event rates for tildrakizumab.

Guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab in a real-world setting: drug survival and effectiveness in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have shown promising results for interleukin-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis. The drugs have been used in clinical practice since 2017.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the drug survival and effectiveness of interleukin-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated with either guselkumab, tildrakizumab, or risankizumab at the Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, during the period from June 11 2018, to July 14 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were included. During the study, 19 patients discontinued treatment with an interleukin-23 inhibitor, and mean treatment duration (SD) was 61.4 weeks (43.7). Seventy-six patients (95%) had previous use of ≥1 biologic. One-year drug survival was 81.0%. Among patients, 64.3% achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 2 at weeks 12-17; 61.3%, at weeks 40-60. There was no statistically significant difference between the drugs regarding the chance of achieving PASI ≤ 2 (p>.05). Twenty-two patients (27.5%) had PsA. Among these, 40.9% and 36.4% achieved complete remission and partial remission, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Interleukin-23 inhibitors appear to have high and similar drug survival and effectiveness in patients with difficult-to-treat psoriasis and PsA.

Efficacy and Safety of Tildrakizumab in Older Patients: Pooled Analyses of Two Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2) Through 244 Weeks

The evidence on treating older patients with psoriasis with modern biologics is scarce. This study compared the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab among younger and older patients with psoriasis (< 65/≥ 65 years) in a post hoc analysis of 2 phase III trials (reSURFACE1/2, n = 1,862). Tildrakizumab 100 mg/200 mg was administered at weeks 0/4/every 12 weeks thereafter. At week 28, patients with ≥ 75% improvement in baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) in reSURFACE1 were re-randomized to the same tildrakizumab dose or placebo; in reSURFACE2, PASI75 responders to 200 mg were re-randomized to tildrakizumab 100 mg or 200 mg; PASI75 responders to 100 mg maintained their dose. At weeks 64/52 (reSURFACE1/2), PASI50 responders entered an extension period (weeks 256/244). Outcomes were proportion of patients with PASI < 3, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1, comorbidities, comedication, and side-effects. The proportion of patients with a PASI < 3 was similar and maintained (tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg, week 244: 83.3% and 84.1%/92.3% and 100.0%); DLQI 0/1 proportions at week 52 were 66.8% and 72.0%/68.3% and 81.3%. Comorbidity and comedication were more common in older patients. The safety profile of tildrakizumab appeared favourable in both groups. Tildrakizumab in patients ≥ 65 years appears effective and safe in long-term psoriasis management. These findings might assist treatment selection and overcome treatment reluctance.

The optimal use of tildrakizumab in the elderly via improvement of Treg function and its preventive effect of psoriatic arthritis

Introduction

As a form of precision medicine, this study aimed to investigate the specific patient population that would derive the greatest benefit from tildrakizumab, as well as the mechanism of action and efficacy of tildrakizumab in reducing the occurrence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods

To achieve this, a multi-center, prospective cohort study was conducted, involving a population of 246 psoriasis patients who had not received any systemic therapy or topical finger therapy between January 2020 and April 2023. Two independent clinicians, who were blinded to the study, analyzed nailfold capillary (NFC) abnormalities, such as nailfold bleeding (NFB) and enlarged capillaries, as well as the incidence of new PsA. Additionally, the factors that determined the response of psoriasis after seven months of tildrakizumab treatment were examined. The study also examined the quantity and role of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and T helper 17 cells both pre- and post-treatment.

Results

The severity of psoriasis, as measured by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), was found to be more pronounced in the tildrakizumab group (n=20) in comparison to the topical group (n=226). At 7 months after tildrakizumab treatment, multivariate analysis showed that those 65 years and older had a significantly better response to treatment in those achieved PASI clear or PASI 2 or less (Likelihood ratio (LR) 16.15, p<0.0001; LR 6. 16, p=0.01). Tildrakizumab improved the number and function of Tregs, which had been reduced by aging. Tildrakizumab demonstrated significant efficacy in improving various pathological factors associated with PsA. These factors include the reduction of NFB, enlargement of capillaries, and inhibition of PsA progression. The hazard ratio for progression to PsA was found to be 0.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.0007-0.46, p=0.007), indicating a substantial reduction in the risk of developing PsA.

Discussion

Tildrakizumab's effectiveness in improving skin lesions can be attributed to its ability to enhance the number and function of Tregs, which are known to decline with age. Furthermore, the drug's positive impact on NFB activity and capillary enlargement, both of which are recognized as risk factors for PsA, further contribute to its inhibitory effect on PsA progression.

Suspected oncologic adverse reactions associated with interleukin-23 inhibitors in EudraVigilance: Comparative study and gender distribution

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by plaque formation. Interleukin (IL)-23 is upregulated in psoriatic lesions and is thought to be a major regulator of the Th17 pathway in psoriasis pathogenesis. Three monoclonal antibodies targeting the IL-23p19 subunit, guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab, have been approved for psoriasis therapy. The balance between cytokines IL-23 and IL-12 can affect antitumor and pro-tumor immune activities, and patients with psoriasis may have higher rates of cancer than the general population. Moreover, a chronic inflammatory state typical of psoriasis may induce protumorigenic effects, however, the potential risk of malignancy in patients taking these drugs remains largely unknown. This study investigated the occurrence of malignancies as suspected adverse reactions (SARs) potentially associated with IL-23 inhibitors by analyzing real-world data from the European EudraVigilance database. Although indicatory, these real-world data seem to confirm the potential association between the IL-23 inhibitors risankizumab and tildrakizumab, and the occurrence of SARs linked to cancer in patients with psoriasis and, according to a gender perspective, they show that this relationship is asymmetrically distributed between women and men, with a clear prevalence of oncologic SARs in men.

Effectiveness and Safety After a Switch to Tildrakizumab: A Real World Multicenter Italian Study in Psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Tildrakizumab is a humanized IgG1κ monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23, approved in 2018 for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and survival of tildrakizumab in the medium term (48 weeks) in psoriatic patients failure to previous biologic treatment in a real world setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter observational study that included adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, failure to previous biologic therapy, consecutively treated with tildrakizumab. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Body Surface Area (BSA) values were recorded at baseline, at 12 and 48 weeks of treatment. Safety and tolerability of tildrakizumab were investigated by examining the presence of any adverse events.

RESULTS

Overall 51 patients were enrolled. Baseline disease severity was moderate to severe with a mean PASI score of 19.2 ± 8.5, mean BSA of 16 ± 10.4, and mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 18.2 ± 6.8. A significant reduction in the mean PASI score was detected at 12 weeks of tildrakizumab therapy (3.5 ± 2.7, P < 0.001), with a further improvement at week 48 (0.6 ± 1.5, P < 0.001). At week 12, there was a great improvement in BSA score for all groups (P <0.001) with further increase at week 48. The effectiveness was confirmed also by DLQI assessment, with a significant decrease at week 12 and even more at week 48 (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the effectiveness of tildrakizumab in daily clinical practice in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Guselkumab, Risankizumab, and Tildrakizumab in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of Existing Trials and Real-Life Data

The treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has always been a real challenge for dermatologists; to date, the only biologic drugs approved for HS are adalimumab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α drug, authorized in 2015, and secukinumab, recently licensed. The management of this condition is challenging as the available treatments show variable results, and the course of the condition is often chronic-recurrent; therefore, it will be necessary for the future to identify new therapeutic targets for HS. In recent years, studies have focused on the development towards new therapeutic targets. The purpose of our review was to perform a comprehensive literature review of real-life data on anti-IL23 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab) in HS to summarize the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of these drugs. We selected 64 articles, among which 32 had the characteristics that we were looking for in our review. To date, the positive data expressed in real-life experiences contrast with the three existing Phase 2 studies conducted so far, where it seems that these drugs may be useful only for a subgroup of patients with HS whose features need to be elucidated. Data from Phase 3 studies and other real-life experiences, perhaps more detailed and with higher numbers, will certainly be needed to fully understand the efficacy and safety of this class of drugs.

Successful treatment of acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau with tildrakizumab: A case report

Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau is a rare, localized variant of pustular psoriasis commonly associated with join disease and severe quality of life impairment. While there are no standard treatment guidelines, therapies used for psoriasis vulgaris are commonly tried. We report a case of severe acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau in a patient with multiple comorbidities (advanced malignancy, recurrent empyema, psoriatic arthritis) where tildrakizumab lead to a rapid resolution of skin and joint disease which was maintained 1 year later. To date, there are only four cases reporting the use of IL-23 inhibitors class in acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau and none for tildrakizumab. However, IL-23 inhibitors should be strongly considered among the treatment of choice for acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau, especially in patients with ongoing malignancy and/or high risk of infections.

Quality of life and patient-reported symptoms in a Phase 4, real-world study of tildrakizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: Week 28 interim analysis

Background: Tildrakizumab is an anti-interleukin-23 p19 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Little real-world evidence is available regarding the effects of tildrakizumab on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported symptoms.Objective: This real-world study of tildrakizumab evaluated changes in HRQoL and clinical symptoms in patients with psoriasis.Materials and methods: In this Week (W)28 interim analysis of a 64-week Phase 4 study (NCT03718299), patients received tildrakizumab 100 mg at W0, W4, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Endpoints were improvement from baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Itch-, Pain-, and Scaling-Numerical Rating Scale scores through W28.Results: Of 55 patients enrolled, 53 were assessed at W28. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) total PGWBI score improved from baseline to W28 (change, 3.7 [12.4]; P = .033), as did the positive well-being (1.0 [2.9]; P = .018) and general health (1.5 [2.2]; P <.001) domain scores. Mean (SD) DLQI score improved by -3.9 (4.3) at W4 and by -7.6 (5.1) at W28 (P <.001). Patient-reported symptoms improved starting at W4 (P <.001).Conclusion: Tildrakizumab treatment improved HRQoL and patient-reported symptoms in patients with psoriasis in a real-world setting.

Comparing quality of life in women with vulvovaginal lichen planus treated with topical and systemic treatments using the vulvar quality of life index

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

For patients with vulvovaginal lichen planus (VLP), there exists limited data on the comparison between patient quality of life treated with topical and/or systemic treatments. We characterised the treatment outcomes of VLP using the vulvar quality of life index (VQLI) comparing women treated with systemic immunosuppression, including humanised interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody tildrakizumab, to those treated with topical corticosteroids alone.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study is reported from a dermatology practice in Sydney, Australia. Electronic medical records for adult women with a diagnosis of VLP were reviewed identifying 112 subjects. VQLI scores in four domains (symptoms, activities of daily living, anxiety and sexual function) were compared between women able to maintain remission of disease with topical monotherapy to those with recalcitrant disease requiring treatment with conventional systemic immunosuppressants and for those not responding to this treatment, tildrakizumab.

RESULTS

At baseline women requiring tildrakizumab treatment had the highest total VQLI score (24.6), whilst women whose disease was maintained on topical treatment had the lowest (19.2). Women treated whilst on tildrakizumab had significant reduced total mean VQLI scores (13.32, 95% CI 8.61-18.01) than when treated with other Systemic (22.00, 95% CI 16.52-27.53; p < 0.001) or topical (21.71, 95% CI 16.13-26.32; p < 0.01). Women treated with tildrakizumab demonstrated statistically significant decreases in mean VQLI scores in all four domains of the VQLI compared to previous scores when on other systemic treatments.

CONCLUSION

We report the largest cohort study to date of adult women with VLP evaluating treatment responses to topical and systemic agents using the VQLI. In women whose VLP did not improve with conventional systemic immunosuppressants, tildrakizumab resulted in statistically significant decrease in mean VQLI scores in all 4 domains, highlighting tildrakizumab as an alternative treatment for VLP.

Efficacy and Safety of Tildrakizumab in a Patient with Chronic HBV Infection

The introduction of biologic drugs revolutionized the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis. However, safety concerns still remain, particularly on patient affected by opportunistic infections. In this scenario, the safety of biologic drugs in patient with HBV infection is debated. Globally, screening for hepatitis before starting biological treatment is mandatory as well as a referral to an infectivologist and eventual prophylactic management should be evaluated case by case, also considering risk factors. On the one hand, the use of anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor seems to increase the risk of HBV reactivation, conversely, the use of recently approved classes of biologics [anti-interleukin (IL) 17 and anti-IL23] seems to have a lower risk of HBV reactivation. However, the evidence on the safety of anti-IL23 drugs in patients affected by HBV is scant, particularly for patients undergoing treatment with tildrakizumab. Herein, we report the first case of a female patient affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis and with chronic HBV infection undergoing prophylaxis, successfully treated with tildrakizumab without reporting hepatitis reactivation. Even if limited, our case seems to confirm available evidence about the safety of anti-IL23, particularly tildrakizumab, on patients with chronic HBV infection undergoing prophylaxis.

Tildrakizumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Results from 52 Weeks Real-Life Retrospective Study

Background

Tildrakizumab, an anti-IL-23, showed promising efficacy and safety profiles in two randomized clinical-trials (reSURFACE-1 and reSURFACE-2), comparing tildrakizumab superiority to placebo and etanercept. Due to its recent availability in clinical-practice, real-life data are still limited.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in a real-world-practice in patients suffering from moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Methods

A 52-week observational retrospective study enrolled patients suffering from moderate-to-severe plaque-psoriasis, starting tildrakizumab treatment.

Results

A total of 42 patients were included in the study. Mean PASI showed a significant reduction at each follow-up (p<0.001), reducing from 13.5±5.9 at baseline, 2.8±3.8 at week-28, resulting stable up to week-52. High rates of patients reached both PASI90 and PASI100 responses at both week 16 (PASI90: 52.4%, PASI100: 33.3%) and week 28 (PASI90: 76.1%, PASI100: 61.9%), maintaining these up to week 52 (PASI90: 73.8%, PASI100: 59.5%). The impact of treatment on patient's quality of life has been evaluated with DLQI, which showed a significant reduction during follow-ups.

Conclusion

Our data confirm tildrakizumab as an effective and generally safe treatment for the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, with high rates of both PASI90 and PASI100 responses, and very few reported adverse events, up to 52 weeks of follow-up.

Anti-IL 23 biologics for the treatment of plaque psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease that can drastically affect a patient's quality-of-life and is associated with multiple comorbid conditions. The most common form of psoriasis is plaque psoriasis, commonly presenting as sharply demarcated, erythematous plaques with overlying silvery scale on the trunk, extensor surfaces, limbs, and scalp. Although initially limited to oral therapies, the choices in systemic therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have evolved with biologic immunotherapies being the main focus.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we describe the IL-23/Th17 axis and IL-23 inhibitors as targets for a growing family of biologics. This family includes the FDA-approved medications ustekinumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab. We will review the safety and efficacy of these medications throughout various Phase 1,2, and 3, trials for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. A literature search of PubMed was utilized for the following terms: 'psoriasis and IL-23,' 'ustekinumab,' 'guselkumab,' 'tildrakizumab,' and 'risankizumab.' We also searched for clinical trials involving IL-23 inhibitors registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-IL 23 therapy, especially anti-p19 monoclonal antibodies, should be considered first-line therapy for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis due to their efficacy and relative safety. More research is required to expand the scope of anti-p19 therapy to pediatric populations and additional indications such as psoriatic arthritis.

The role of IL-23 and the use of IL-23 inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis characterised by musculoskeletal and extra-articular manifestations, most notably psoriasis. While the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms are not yet fully understood, a central role has been identified for the IL-23/IL-17 pathway.

OBJECTIVES

We briefly describe the role of IL-23 in the pathogenesis of PsA and go on to describe the available anti-IL-23 agents and their place in the management of PsA.

METHODS

This is a narrative review of the current literature, focussing on the results of the phase 3 studies in PsA for the IL-12/23 p40 inhibitor ustekinumab and the more recent IL-23 p19 inhibitors guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab.

RESULTS

IL-23 triggers expression of IL-17 and other effector cytokines in a variety of cells, leading to tissue inflammation and injury. Targeting IL-23, particularly with p19 inhibitors, appears to be an effective and safe strategy for multiple clinical domains in PsA, most notably the skin, with some differences in efficacy emerging between these agents.

CONCLUSION

The development of IL-23 inhibitors represents a significant advance in the management of psoriatic disease. In the absence of head-to-head studies, future data emerging from real-world experiences of individual IL-23 p19 inhibitors will help inform the use of these agents in relation to other biologics in PsA.

Guselkumab, Risankizumab, and Tildrakizumab in the Management of Psoriasis: A Review of the Real-World Evidence

Interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors, guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab, represent the latest class of biologics approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Since their approval numerous real-life studies were published on anti-IL-23 use in routine clinical practice. Indeed, real-life data are important to improve the dermatological decision-making process, including patients who are typically excluded from clinical trials, such as subjects suffering from several comorbidities, subjects on polypharmacy, as well as multifailure patients. Herein, we performed a comprehensive literature review about real-life data available on guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab. Real-life data of anti-IL-23 seem to confirm the promising results of IL-23 shown by clinical trials, highlighting the efficacy and safety profiles of this new class of biologics also in clinical practice.

Title: Real-world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab: results from an Italian 28-week retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Guselkumab, tildrakizumab and risankizumab, acting on interleukin(IL)23 axis, have been recently approved for psoriasis management. However, real-life data regarding their comparison are scant.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our real life study was to perform an indirect efficacy and safety comparison among anti-IL23s, particularly focusing on difficult-to-treat areas.

METHODS

A 2-year single-center retrospective observational study was performed enrolling moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients treated with anti-IL23. For each patient clinical and demographical data were collected at baseline and at week4, week16 and week28. PASI, BSA, NAPSI and specific BSA regarding difficult to treat areas were evaluated.

RESULTS

150 patients were included in the study: 63 (42%) received guselkumab, 21 (14%) tildrakizumab and 66 (44%) risankizumab. The three groups were comparable for age, sex and disease severity, only differing for psoriasis duration, psoriatic arthritis prevalence (higher in guselkumab), and previous systemic treatment failure (lower for tildrakizumab). Mean PASI and BSA significantly reduced from baseline up to week 28 without significant differences among the 3 drugs (reduction of 95-97.3% for PASI and 94.8-96.7% for BSA). No significant differences were registered for PASI75, 90 or 100 responses, in particular PASI100 was reached by 73.4-85% of patients. As regards difficult-to-treat areas, all the drug displayed a high efficacy, with significant differences registered only for the rapidity of action on palmoplantar psoriasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our 28-weeks study demonstrated a comparable efficacy and safety profile for all anti-IL23, with guselkumab and risankizumab appearing slightly faster than tildrakizumab particularly on palmoplantar lesions in the short-term.

Clinical implications and predictive values of early PASI responses to tildrakizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether early Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) improvements can predict week 28 tildrakizumab responders and nonresponders.

METHODS

Psoriasis patients pooled from two tildrakizumab phase 3 trials randomized to receive tildrakizumab 100 mg at weeks 0, 4, 16, and 28 were included. Patients were grouped by week 28 PASI responses (<50, 50-74, 75-89, and 90-100). PASI improvements from baseline at weeks 4 and 16 were analyzed for each response group.

RESULTS

Of 575 patients included, 8.3%, 14.3%, 23.8%, and 53.6%, respectively, achieved PASI <50, 50-74, 75-89, and 90-100 at week 28. Of patients with PASI <50 at week 16, 85% did not achieve PASI ≥75 at week 28 (nonresponders). Rapid response, defined as PASI ≥50 at week 4 (after a single tildrakizumab dose), was observed in 41% of patients. Of these patients, 87% were week 28 responders (PASI ≥75); 67% were 'super responders' (PASI 90-100). Among week 28 responders and super responders, 45% and 50% achieved PASI ≥50 at week 4, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tildrakizumab week 28 nonresponders can be identified by week 16 PASI response. PASI improvements as early as week 4 can predict patients' week 28 PASI improvement status.

Tildrakizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a multi-center, retrospective, real-life study

New biologic agents targeting interleukin (IL)23/T‐helper17 axis, such as tildrakizumab, have been developed for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. To analyze the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in a real life setting of patients affected by moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis over a 28‐week treatment period. A multicentric retrospective study was conducted in patients who initiated tildrakizumab between February 2020 and March 2021. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index—PASI was measured at baseline and after 4, 16 and 28 weeks. The percentage change in PASI value from baseline to the considered time‐points, proportion of patients with absolute PASI <3 at week 28 and the percentages of achieving a PASI75 or PASI90 response were assessed. Data about potential safety issues and adverse events (AEs) were collected. Statistical analysis were performed for establish clinical efficacy and for variables predicting clinical response. Fifty nine patients with psoriasis were included. Overall mean PASI percentage reduction was of 88% from baseline to week 28 and 47 out of 59 patients (79.7%) at week 28 had an absolute PASI <3. PASI75 and PASI90 responses at week 28 were achieved by 48 (81.40%) patients and 38 (64.4.0%) patients, respectively. No substantial associations between gender, body mass index ‐ BMI, PASI at baseline and prior exposition to biological therapies and the efficacy endpoints were retrieved. No serious safety issues or discontinuations related to adverse events were reported. In our real‐life study, tildrakizumab showed high efficacy and a favorable safety profile, regardless of patient‐ and disease‐related factors.

Coesisting inflammatory skin diseases: Tildrakizumab to control psoriasis and Omalizumab for urticaria

In Western countries the number of individuals suffering from an autoimmune condition is constantly growing and often patients suffering from autoimmune disease are susceptible to developing a second autoimmune disorder. We report a case of an adult female patient affected by psoriasis vulgaris and treated with tildrakizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23, who later developed chronic spontaneous urticaria and started omalizumab, a humanized antibody to IgE, showing a favorable outcome. We speculate that the two combined therapies have restored the cytokine balance bringing it towards tolerance and remission of the two pathologies. It is conceivable that tildrakizumab may have a synergic action with omalizumab in the treatment of urticaria in patients affected by both psoriasis and urticaria. Our case and the study of the mechanisms of action of the two drugs suggest how the two therapies can act with an interlocking mechanism in achieving the final therapeutic effect.

Successful treatment of vulvovaginal lichen planus with tildrakizumab: A case series of 24 patients

Vulvovaginal lichen planus (VLP) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis affecting the genital skin and mucosa that can have a profound negative impact on patient quality of life. Up to 43% of women with VLP require systemic immunosuppression to achieve disease remission, and some individuals prove to be highly treatment resistant. We present a case series of 24 women with severe VLP who successfully achieved remission using off-label treatment with the interleukin-23 (IL-23) monoclonal antibody blocker tildrakizumab, and highlight tildrakizumab as a treatment for women with recalcitrant VLP who have failed more conservative treatments.

Biologics for severe, chronic plaque psoriasis: An Australian cost-utility analysis

Background

Biologics are a good therapeutic option for severe, chronic plaque psoriasis; however, they come with significant cost to the health care system.

Objective

To conduct a cost-utility analysis of outpatient biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, guselkumab, ixekizumab, risankizumab, secukinumab, tildrakizumab, and ustekinumab) available to adults with severe, chronic plaque psoriasis from the perspective of the Australian health care system.

Methods

A Markov cohort model was constructed to estimate the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs accrued for treatment pathways commencing with different first-line biologics, over a 96-week time horizon. The model adhered to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme eligibility criteria and guidelines.

Results

A biologic treatment pathway commencing on tildrakizumab was the most cost-effective first-line treatment (Australian dollar 39,930; total utility of 1.57 QALYs over 96 weeks). First-line secukinumab and risankizumab had incremental cost-utility ratios of Australian dollar 194,524/QALY and Australian dollar 479,834/QALY, respectively, when compared with first-line tildrakizumab.

Limitations

The efficacy and utility input parameters were derived from international randomized control trials and patients from the United Kingdom, respectively. Findings from this study cannot be generalized beyond Australia.

Conclusion

Tildrakizumab may be considered as first-line treatment for adult patients with severe, chronic plaque psoriasis embarking on biologic therapy, from the economic perspective of the Australian health care system.

Multifaceted Analysis of IL-23A- and/or EBI3-Including Cytokines Produced by Psoriatic Keratinocytes

Interleukin (IL) 23 (p19/p40) plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and is upregulated in psoriasis skin lesions. In clinical practice, anti-IL-23Ap19 antibodies are highly effective against psoriasis. IL-39 (p19/ Epstein-Barr virus-induced (EBI) 3), a newly discovered cytokine in 2015, shares the p19 subunit with IL-23. Anti-IL-23Ap19 antibodies may bind to IL-39; also, the cytokine may contribute to the pathogenesis of psoriasis. To investigate IL23Ap19- and/or EBI3-including cytokines in psoriatic keratinocytes, we analyzed IL-23Ap19 and EBI3 expressions in psoriasis skin lesions, using immunohistochemistry and normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEKs) stimulated with inflammatory cytokines, using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-Ms/Ms). Immunohistochemical analysis showed that IL-23Ap19 and EBI3 expressions were upregulated in the psoriasis skin lesions. In vitro, these expressions were synergistically induced by the triple combination of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-17A, and interferon (IFN)-γ, and suppressed by dexamethasone, vitamin D3, and acitretin. In ELISA and LC-Ms/Ms analyses, keratinocyte-derived IL-23Ap19 and EBI3, but not heterodimeric forms, were detected with humanized anti-IL-23Ap19 monoclonal antibodies, tildrakizumab, and anti-EBI3 antibodies, respectively. Psoriatic keratinocytes may express IL-23Ap19 and EBI3 proteins in a monomer or homopolymer, such as homodimer or homotrimer.

Tildrakizumab for treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: an expert opinion of efficacy, safety, and use in special populations

INTRODUCTION

Tildrakizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the p19 subunit of IL-23, a crucial cytokine for Th17 cells. Tildrakizumab has been assessed in several Phase I, II, and III clinical trials and is approved for treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are indicated for systemic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The available evidence on the efficacy, safety, and use of tildrakizumab in special populations was evaluated by 14 experts who critically reviewed the current literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Tildrakizumab has good efficacy that lasts for at least 5 years in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, and appears to be safe and well tolerated in the long-term with no apparent dose-related differences in adverse events, a low incidence of discontinuation due to adverse events, and no evidence of increased risk of malignancies. The safety and the efficacy of tildrakizumab has also been confirmed in special populations such as those with inflammatory bowel disease, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and advanced age. Early intervention with IL-23-inhibitors, such as tildrakizumab, may help to control symptoms and change the long-term course of the disease in patients affected by plaque psoriasis, while improving the quality of life and potentially minimizing the risk of developing comorbidities.

A Review of the Efficacy and Safety for Biologic Agents Targeting IL-23 in Treating Psoriasis With the Focus on Tildrakizumab

Psoriasis is a chronic and debilitating inflammatory immune-mediated skin disorder. Several cytokines including interleukin (IL)-23 were demonstrated to play a central role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Treatment options for psoriasis range from topical to systemic modalities, depending on the extent, anatomical locations involved and functional impairment level. Targeting cytokines or their cognate receptors that are involved in disease pathogenesis such as IL-12/23 (i.e., targeting the IL-12p40 subunit shared by these cytokines), IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-17RA, and TNF-α using biologic agents emerged in recent years as a highly effective therapeutic option for patients with moderate-to-severe disease. This review provides an overview of the important role of IL-23 signaling in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. We describe in detail the available IL-23 inhibitors for chronic plaque psoriasis. The efficacy, pharmacokinetic properties, and the safety profile of one of the most recent IL-23 biologic agents (tildrakizumab) are evaluated and reviewed in depth.

Successful management of treatment resistant nail psoriasis with tildrakizumab

Nail psoriasis significantly impacts quality of life and is notoriously difficult to treat. Tildrakizumab, an IL-23 inhibitor, has shown significant clinical improvement in the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. We report 2 cases of treatment resistant nail psoriasis which showed marked improvement with the use of off-label tildrakizumab. The dosing regimen utilised was consistent with that used to treat chronic plaque psoriasis, with 100 mg subcutaneously at Day 0 and Week 4, and maintenance dosing of 100 mg every 12 weeks thereafter. Significant improvement at 6 and 12 months, as per the modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), was seen. There have been no tildrakizumab related side effects observed to date. Tildrakizumab appears to be an effective option in managing treatment resistant nail psoriasis.

The Psoriasis Decision Tree

Psoriasis, an inflammatory disorder of the skin, is associated with an increased risk of systemic diseases, such as psoriatic arthritis, psychiatric disorders, malignancy, and cardiometabolic and inflammatory bowel diseases. Careful consideration of the presence of these comorbidities should guide selection of appropriate therapy. The evolution of therapeutic targets for the treatment of psoriasis has significantly advanced available treatment options, potentially leading to uncertainty when selecting the optimal treatment for each patient. In this article, we review evidence-based guidelines for the use of psoriasis treatments in patients with distinct comorbidities, and group appropriate therapeutic options into a visual aid. An easy-to-use visual tool incorporating treatment options best suited for specific comorbidities can increase physicians' confidence when selecting the most appropriate treatment on an individualized basis.

Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a 64-week phase 3 study (reSURFACE 1)

Tildrakizumab is a high‐affinity, humanized immunoglobulin G1κ, anti‐interleukin‐23p19 monoclonal antibody recently approved in Japan for treatment of plaque psoriasis. We report results from Japanese patients treated with tildrakizumab in the multinational, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled reSURFACE 1 study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01722331). Adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized (2:2:1) to receive subcutaneous tildrakizumab 100 or 200 mg or placebo every 12 weeks. Placebo recipients were rerandomized to tildrakizumab 100 or 200 mg at week 12. The global study coprimary endpoints were the proportions of patients achieving 75% improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) response (0/1 with ≥2 grade reduction from baseline) at week 12. Analyses included 158 Japanese patients randomized to tildrakizumab 100 (n = 64) or 200 mg (n = 62) or placebo (n = 32). Japanese patients had higher mean baseline body surface area involvement and PASI versus all reSURFACE 1 patients. At week 12, significantly more Japanese patients receiving tildrakizumab 100 and 200 mg versus placebo achieved PASI 75 (54.7% and 54.8% vs 6.3%, respectively, both nominal p < 0.001) and PGA 0/1 response (54.7% and 56.5% vs 9.4%, respectively, both nominal P < 0.001). Response rates increased over time with maximal efficacy after 22‐28 weeks; >80% of patients achieving PASI 75 or PASI 90 at week 28 and continuing tildrakizumab treatment at the same dose maintained response at week 64. From baseline to week 28, absolute PASI decreased from >12 in all patients to ≤2 in >40% and ≤3 in >50% of patients receiving tildrakizumab. Tildrakizumab was generally well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo. Tildrakizumab treatment was associated with durable efficacy in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis despite greater baseline disease severity versus the global reSURFACE 1 population.

Long-term efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a 5-year extension of a phase 3 study (reSURFACE 1)

The three part, double‐blind, randomized, controlled reSURFACE 1 trial and extension study (NCT01722331) evaluated efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Patients with ≥50% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) following treatment with tildrakizumab 100 mg (TIL100) or 200 mg (TIL200) could enter the optional long‐term extension study and continue treatment at the same dose for an additional 192 weeks. This subgroup analysis assessed the long‐term efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab treatment for Japanese patients enrolled in reSURFACE 1 for up to 5 years of treatment. The primary efficacy outcomes were the proportions of patients who maintained PASI 75 and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) clear or minimal with ≥2‐grade reduction from baseline (PGA 0/1) from base study week 64 to extension week 192. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients who maintained PASI 90/100 from base study week 64 to extension week 192. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study and for up to 20 weeks after the last study visit. Of the 120 Japanese patients who entered the reSURFACE 1 extension study, 43 (79.6%) patients receiving tildrakizumab 100 mg and 58 (87.9%) patients receiving tildrakizumab 200 mg completed the extension study. Of all Japanese patients with PASI 75/90/100 and PGA 0/1 at week 64, 85%/88% receiving TIL100/TIL200 maintained PASI 75, 70%/96% maintained PASI 90, 63%/67% maintained PASI 100, and 68%/72% maintained PGA 0/1 at extension week 192. AEs led to discontinuation in 1.7 patients per 100 patient‐years (P100PY) receiving tildrakizumab 100 mg and 0.8 P100PY receiving tildrakizumab 200 mg. Incidences of severe infections, malignancies, confirmed major adverse cardiac events, and hypersensitivity reactions were low in both treatment groups. Through 5 years of treatment, tildrakizumab maintained efficacy and was well tolerated with low rates of AEs of special interest.

A non-clinical comparative study of IL-23 antibodies in psoriasis

Four antibodies that inhibit interleukin (IL)-23 are approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Here, we present non-clinical data comparing ustekinumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab and risankizumab with regard to thermostability, IL-23 binding affinity, inhibitory-binding mode, in vitro potency and in vivo efficacy. Risankizumab and guselkumab exhibited 5-fold higher affinity for IL-23 and showed more potent inhibition of IL-23 signaling than ustekinumab and tildrakizumab. Risankizumab and guselkumab completely blocked the binding of IL-23 to IL-23Rα as expected, whereas tildrakizumab did not. In vitro, risankizumab and guselkumab blocked the terminal differentiation of TH17 cells in a similar manner, while tildrakizumab had minimal impact on TH17 differentiation. In a human IL-23-induced ear-swelling mouse model, risankizumab and guselkumab were more effective than ustekinumab and tildrakizumab at reducing IL-17, IL-22, and keratinocyte gene expression. Our results indicate that the four clinically approved antibodies targeting IL-23 differ in affinity and binding epitope. These attributes contribute to differences in in vitro potency, receptor interaction inhibition mode and in vivo efficacy in preclinical studies as described in this report, and similarly may affect the clinical performance of these drugs.

Treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with tildrakizumab in the real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Tildrakizumab is a high-affinity, humanized IgG1κ monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of IL-23, which is a key regulatory cytokine in psoriasis. Based on evidence from clinical trials, tildrakizumab is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in patients eligible for systemic therapy.

METHODS

We report our clinical experience with 26 patients followed up to 24 weeks.

RESULTS

No adverse event was observed and no patient discontinued tildrakizumab. Whilst no patient had a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of <5 at baseline, at week 4, 8 (32%) patients had a PASI score of <3 and 6 of these had a PASI score of 0. At week 12, 19 (79%) patients had a PASI score of <5 and, among these, 18 had a PASI score of <3 of whom 16 had a PASI score of 0. At week 24, 22 (96%) patients had a PASI score of <3 and 20 (87%) had a PASI score of 0. Quality of life was improved after 4 weeks and through the whole period of observation.

CONCLUSION

Our experience in the real-life setting confirms the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab as demonstrated by clinical trials.

Guselkumab: the First Selective IL-23 Inhibitor for Active Psoriatic Arthritis in Adults

INTRODUCTION

Guselkumab is a subcutaneously administered human monoclonal antibody, selectively blocking IL-23 through binding to its p19 subunit. It was initially approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy. Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for publications, using the following search terms: psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab, p19, interleukin 23, guidelines, treatment recommendations, DISCOVER, ECLIPSE, and VOYAGE.

AREAS COVERED

Accumulating evidence suggests that the IL-23/Th17 pathway is important in the pathogenesis of both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Following a successful development program in psoriasis, guselkumab was evaluated for its efficacy and safety in psoriatic arthritis in a comprehensive clinical trial program, comprising one phase-2 study and two phase-3 studies (DISCOVER-1 and -2). Complementary data on pharmacokinetics and safety exist from pre-clinical experiments and pooled analyses from two long-term studies in psoriasis (VOYAGE-1 and -2). Based on the DISCOVER-1 and -2 data, guselkumab was approved by the FDA for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis in 2020.

EXPERT OPINION

Guselkumab is the first selective IL-23 inhibitor approved to treat adults with active psoriatic arthritis, broadening therapeutic options in the field through a novel mode of action.

Comparison of psoriasis guidelines for use of IL-23 inhibitors in the United States and United Kingdom: a critical appraisal and comprehensive review

PURPOSE

This review article aims to compare global dermatologic organizations and the clinical practice guidelines available for the use of interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors in the treatment of psoriasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review encompassing systemic therapies for the treatment of psoriasis was conducted. Guidelines from the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD)-National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) served as the main comparators in this review.

RESULTS

Of the American and European guidelines available for use of IL-23 inhibitors, several organizations are in agreement regarding the dosage and indications of guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab. However, there are differences as well as insufficient recommendations concerning laboratory monitoring and screenings as well as contraindications to therapy.

CONCLUSION

IL-23 inhibitors are safe and efficacious therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis and should be considered as a potential first-line therapy alone or in combination with topical medications, phototherapy, and other systemic non-biologic agents. Consideration should be given to the evidence-based guidelines of global dermatologic organizations to help guide therapeutic decisions.

Tildrakizumab: An Evidence-Based Review of Its Use in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a common immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disease, and observations have pointed toward the IL-23/Th17 cell axis as having a key role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. This new immunological understanding of the pathogenesis has been translated into targeted and highly effective biologic therapies. Tildrakizumab is a humanized IgG1/k monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 unit of IL-23 and has been registered for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis in adults since 2018. This review provides an overview of the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab, focusing on the results from clinical trials. In both Phase II and III trials, tildrakizumab 100 and 200 mg was significantly more efficacious than both placebo and etanercept at week 12. The effect of tildrakizumab continued to increase until week 28. Long-term follow-up showed high levels of efficacy for up to 3 years. Despite no difference between 100 and 200 mg in Phase III studies, subgroup analyses showed better efficacy when treated with 200 mg in patients with bodyweight ≥90 kg. The overall drug safety was good, and besides discrete higher incidence of nasopharyngitis, the conducted clinical trials show that tildrakizumab was very well tolerated without any safety concerns. Compared to other IL-23p19 inhibitors, tildrakizumab seemed to have slightly lower efficacy. However, to determine its position in the treatment algorithm of psoriasis, head-to-head trials with other IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors and long-term real-world data are required.

Tildrakizumab efficacy, drug survival, and safety are comparable in patients with psoriasis with and without metabolic syndrome: Long-term results from 2 phase 3 randomized controlled studies (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2)

BACKGROUND

Data for the effect of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on the efficacy and safety of biologic agents for psoriasis treatment are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term tildrakizumab efficacy, drug survival, and safety in patients with psoriasis by baseline MetS status.

METHODS

Post hoc analyses of up to 3 years of efficacy data and 5 years of safety data from the phase 3, double-blind, randomized controlled reSURFACE 1 and 2 trial (NCT01722331 and NCT01729754) base and extension studies were conducted for patients receiving continuous tildrakizumab 100 or 200 mg.

RESULTS

Of 338 (n = 124/214 in reSURFACE 1/2) and 307 (n = 147/160 in reSURFACE 1/2) patients continuously receiving tildrakizumab 100 and 200 mg, respectively, throughout the studies, 26/44 (21%/21%) and 34/30 (23%/19%) met MetS criteria. Proportions of patients who achieved a 75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in reSURFACE 1/2 were generally comparable among those with versus without MetS at week 52 (tildrakizumab 100 mg, 85%/86% vs 86%/94%; tildrakizumab 200 mg, 76%/87% vs 76%/87%) and through week 148. Results were similar for responders with 90% and 100% improvement in the PASI. Tildrakizumab's safety profile did not vary by MetS status.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and post hoc analysis limit interpretation.

CONCLUSION

Long-term tildrakizumab efficacy and safety were comparable between patients with and without MetS.

A Systematic Literature Review and Bucher Indirect Comparison: Tildrakizumab versus Guselkumab

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that impacts quality of life and requires long-term treatment and effective symptom management. Interleukin-23 (IL-23) has emerged as a key player in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and tildrakizumab and guselkumab are both immunomodulatory agents that inhibit the p19 subunit of IL-23. In its pivotal Phase III trial, tildrakizumab demonstrated greater efficacy than etanercept in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, there are no head-to-head trials comparing tildrakizumab with guselkumab.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review and Bucher indirect comparison of tildrakizumab and guselkumab, using placebo as a common comparator. We searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE(R) Daily Epub Ahead of Print, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for Phase III randomized controlled trials between 1946 and November 2018. Inclusion criteria were adult patients ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis, and intervention with tildrakizumab or guselkumab compared to placebo or best supportive care. Outcomes included were severity of psoriasis as defined by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 and PASI 90, frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs), and treatment discontinuations. Outcomes were evaluated at Weeks 12 to 16 and 24 to 28. Analysis was based on the intent-to-treat population and, for all outcomes, the number of events reported were analyzed as a proportion of the number of patients randomized to ensure consistency across trials.

RESULTS

Overall, 154 unique records were identified. Five studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis; two tildrakizumab trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2) and three guselkumab trials (VOYAGE 1, VOYAGE 2, and a Japanese study). There was no statistically significant difference between guselkumab and tildrakizumab for PASI 75, PASI 90, SAEs, and rate of discontinuations at either timepoint.

CONCLUSION

This study assessed the comparative efficacy of tildrakizumab and guselkumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Limitations included the limited number of publications, imputation of placebo arm values for Weeks 24 to 28, and limited relevance of the Japanese study. This indirect comparison does not provide evidence that one treatment is superior to the other.

A network meta-analysis for the comparison of efficacy and safety of interleukin (IL)-23 targeted drugs in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis

A variety of interleukin-23 targeted drugs have been used to treat moderate to severe psoriasis, but it is not clear which is most effective. This network meta-analysis compared and summarized the short-term efficacy and safety of interleukin-23 (IL-23) targeted drugs in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were used to search randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis with ustekinumab (Ust), guselkumab (Gus), tildrakizumab (Til), and risankizumab (Ris). Bayesian Network Meta-analysis (NMA) was used to calculate Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75%, 90%; Physician Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (PGA 0/1); Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1 (DLQI 0/1), and safety (adverse events [AEs]) effect estimates (odds ratio OR) and 95% confidence intervals. Direct, indirect, and network meta-analysis estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. The GRADE method was used to assess the quality of evidence for each pair-wise comparison. In addition, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was used to rank the treatment level for each outcome indicator. This network meta-analysis included 14 RCTs with 8402 patients. The results indicate that the curative effect of the IL-23 targeted drugs is better than that of a placebo. Network meta-analysis showed that Ris90 mg and Ris180 mg were significantly more effective than Til (5, 25, 100, and 200 mg), Ust (45 mg, 90 mg, body weight-based administration), Gus 100 mg and Ris (75 and 150 mg). Regarding safety, there is no significant difference in the risk of adverse events between drugs targeting IL-23 and placebo. In addition, according to the ranking of SUCRA, Ris 90 mg has the best efficacy index for PASI 75 and PGA 0/1, with SUCRA values of 97.6% and 97.1%, respectively. Ris 180 mg ranked first in PASI 90 (91.1%), while Ris 75 mg performed best in DLQI 0/1 (73.7%). In this network meta-analysis, risankizumab showed the best curative effect in the short-term treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis, and the risk of adverse events was not significantly different from placebo. However, more research data are needed for further study in the field of cost to evaluate which drug strikes the most favorable balance among efficacy, safety, and cost of access.

Recalcitrant lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia responding to tildrakizumab

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) are lymphocytic, cicatricial alopecias. Clinically, LPP presents with multifocal patchy alopecia, while FFA, considered a variant of LPP, results in hairline recession. Frontal recession in FFA may progress as far as the mid-scalp and infrequently beyond. Treatment to arrest the inflammatory process can be challenging and response variable. We report a case of recalcitrant lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia demonstrating significant clinical improvement after four doses of the interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody tildrakizumab.

Disease activity and treatment efficacy using patient-level Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores from tildrakizumab phase 3 clinical trials

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether primary efficacy outcomes in plaque psoriasis clinical trials represent residual disease during treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate supplementing dichotomous efficacy with residual disease activity.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis used pooled, patient-level data after tildrakizumab 100 mg (N = 616) or placebo (N = 309) treatment from reSURFACE 1/2 (NCT01722331/NCT01729754) phase 3 clinical trials of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

RESULTS

Median baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was 17.9 for patients receiving tildrakizumab 100 mg. At Week 12, median PASI was 2.9, whereas dichotomous PASI 90 response rate was 36.9%, and absolute PASI <5.0, <3.0, and <1.0 were 64.0%, 50.8%, and 23.3%, respectively. At Week 28, median PASI was 1.7, whereas PASI 90 response rate was 51.9%, and absolute PASI <5.0, <3.0, and <1.0 were 75.3%, 62.8%, and 38.0%, respectively. Dermatology Life Quality Index and PASI scores were correlated through Week 28 (r = 0.51, p ≤ .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Disease activity was more reliably estimated by PASI scores than percentage PASI improvement; this may partially explain efficacy disparities between clinical trials and practice. These results suggest supplementing dichotomous PASI improvement with PASI scores and consideration of patient treatment goals could facilitate clinical decisions.