Bariatric Surgery Registries: Can They Contribute to Improved Outcomes?

Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Across the IFSO Chapters: Key Insights on the Baseline Patient Demographics, Procedure Types, and Mortality from the Eighth IFSO Global Registry Report

INTRODUCTION

The International Federation for Surgery for Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Global Registry aims to provide descriptive data about the caseload and penetrance of surgery for metabolic disease and obesity in member countries. The data presented in this report represent the key findings of the eighth report of the IFSO Global Registry.

METHODS

All existing Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS) registries known to IFSO were invited to contribute to the eighth report. Aggregated data was provided by each MBS registry to the team at the Australia and New Zealand Bariatric Surgery Registry (ANZBSR) and was securely stored on a Redcap™ database housed at Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Data was checked for completeness and analyzed by the IFSO Global Registry Committee. Prior to the finalization of the report, all graphs were circulated to contributors and to the global registry committee of IFSO to ensure data accuracy.

RESULTS

Data was received from 24 national and 2 regional registries, providing information on 502,150 procedures. The most performed primary MBS procedure was sleeve gastrectomy, whereas the most performed revisional MBS procedure was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Asian countries reported people with lower BMI undergoing MBS along with higher rates of diabetes. Mortality was a rare event.

CONCLUSION

Registries enable meaningful comparisons between countries on the demographics, characteristics, operation types and approaches, and trends in MBS procedures. Reported outcomes can be seen as flags of potential issues or relationships that could be studied in more detail in specific research studies.

Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Quality of Life

PURPOSE

The clinical benefits of bariatric surgery are well-established, but the impact of bariatric surgery on psychosocial outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQL) is less clear. The aim of this study is to assess the Quality of life (QOL) as a whole and in separate domains in post-bariatric surgery patients.

METHODOLOGY

A single unit cross-sectional analysis of a prospective study is done on QOL in 51 patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at tertiary hospital. QOL was assessed by WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire -Brief version) questionnaire and Global Quality of Life Scale in each patient. Scores were calculated on a 0-100 scale and results compared.

RESULTS

The median scores given by patients before surgery were 14, 21, 42, 40 and 12.5 for each of the parameters physical, psychological, social, environmental and overall well-being respectively. The median scores for after surgery were 86, 87, 91, 88 and 87.5 respectively. The difference was significant (p value 0.001). Global QOL after surgery, calculated year wise, showed QOL scores of 90, 100, 95 and 80 in patients with 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 4 years of follow-up without any significant difference (p value 0.502).

CONCLUSION

Through this study, we emphasize the need for the selection of a standardised scale by international organisations to compare the different studies. By proving the significant differences in the QOL of patients who underwent LSG [laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy], we suggest to consider the Quality of Life as one of the criteria to consider a patient for bariatric surgery.

Development of a Bariatric Surgery Core Data Set for an International Registry

PURPOSE

Bariatric and metabolic surgery is an effective treatment for severe and complex obesity; however, robust long-term data comparing operations is lacking. Clinical registries complement clinical trials in contributing to this evidence base. Agreement on standard data for bariatric registries is needed to facilitate comparisons. This study developed a Core Registry Set (CRS) - core data to include in bariatric surgery registries globally.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Relevant items were identified from a bariatric surgery research core outcome set, a registry data dictionary project, systematic literature searches, and a patient advisory group. This comprehensive list informed a questionnaire for a two-round Delphi survey with international health professionals. Participants rated each item's importance and received anonymized feedback in round 2. Using pre-defined criteria, items were then categorized for voting at a consensus meeting to agree the CRS.

RESULTS

Items identified from all sources were grouped into 97 questionnaire items. Professionals (n = 272) from 56 countries participated in the round 1 survey of which 45% responded to round 2. Twenty-four professionals from 13 countries participated in the consensus meeting. Twelve items were voted into the CRS including demographic and bariatric procedure information, effectiveness, and safety outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This CRS is the first step towards unifying bariatric surgery registries internationally. We recommend the CRS is included as a minimum dataset in all bariatric registries worldwide. Adoption of the CRS will enable meaningful international comparisons of bariatric operations. Future work will agree definitions and measures for the CRS including incorporating quality-of-life measures defined in a parallel project.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes the latest evidence for the impact of bariatric surgery on health-related quality of life (HRQL).

RECENT FINDINGS

The impact of bariatric surgery on HRQL is less well-understood than its clinical effectiveness on weight and co-morbidities. Poor-quality study design and different HRQL measures challenge systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Available limited evidence suggests that physical aspects of HRQL may improve more than mental health aspects of HRQL after bariatric surgery, reaching maximal benefits 1-2 years post-surgery. Comparative HRQL analyses between bariatric procedures cannot be made due to a lack of randomised data. Qualitative research highlights the tensions patients experience after bariatric surgery, which provides insights to observed changes in HRQL. Standardized HRQL measures are being developed and agreed to improve future evidence synthesis. Two multi-centre randomised trials of bariatric surgical procedures including detailed HRQL assessment are in progress. It is hoped that the combination of comparative high-quality HRQL data and information from qualitative studies will provide new insights into patient well-being and health after bariatric surgery.