Gender differences in progressive supranuclear palsy

Unexpected gender differences in progressive supranuclear palsy reveal efficacy for davunetide in women

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a pure tauopathy, implicating davunetide, enhancing Tau-microtubule interaction, as an ideal drug candidate. However, pooling patient data irrespective of sex concluded no efficacy. Here, analyzing sex-dependency in a 52 week-long- PSP clinical trial (involving over 200 patients) demonstrated clear baseline differences in brain ventricular volumes, a secondary endpoint. Dramatic baseline ventricular volume-dependent/volume increase correlations were observed in 52-week-placebo-treated females (r = 0.74, P = 2.36-9), whereas davunetide-treated females (like males) revealed no such effects. Assessment of primary endpoints, by the PSP Rating Scale (PSPRS) and markedly more so by the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SEADL) scale, showed significantly faster deterioration in females, starting at trial week 13 (P = 0.01, and correlating with most other endpoints by week 52). Twice daily davunetide treatments slowed female disease progression and revealed significant protection according to the SEADL scale as early as at 39 weeks (P = 0.008), as well as protection of the bulbar and limb motor domains considered by the PSPRS, including speaking and swallowing difficulties caused by brain damage, and deterioration of fine motor skills, respectably (P = 0.01), at 52 weeks. Furthermore, at 52 weeks of trial, the exploratory Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) significantly correlated with the SEADL scale deterioration in the female placebo group and demonstrated davunetide-mediated protection of females. Female-specific davunetide-mediated protection of ventricular volume corresponded to clinical efficacy. Together with the significantly slower disease progression seen in men, the results reveal sex-based drug efficacy differences, demonstrating the neuroprotective and disease-modifying impact of davunetide treatment for female PSP patients.

Sex differences for cognitive decline in progressive supranuclear palsy

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive dysfunction is a core clinical feature of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), with executive function being most markedly affected. In other neurodegenerative conditions, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, there are a growing number of reports demonstrating that cognition is differentially impacted in men and women. In PSP, however, the sex differences in cognitive decline have yet to be fully characterized.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the TAUROS trial for 139 participants with mild-to-moderate PSP (62 women, 77 men). Sex differences in longitudinal change in cognitive performance were evaluated with linear mixed models. Exploratory subgroup analyses assessed whether sex differences varied by baseline executive dysfunction, PSP phenotype, or baseline age.

RESULTS

In the primary whole group analyses, there were no sex differences for change in cognitive performance. Among participants with normal executive function at baseline, men declined more severely on executive function and language tests. Among the PSP-Parkinsonism subgroup, men declined more severely on category fluency. Across people aged≥65, men had a worse decline on category fluency, whereas across people aged <65, women had a worse decline on DRS construction.

CONCLUSION

In people with mild-to-moderate PSP, there are no sex differences in cognitive decline. However, the rate of cognitive decline may differ for women and men based on the level of baseline executive dysfunction, PSP-phenotype and age. Further studies are needed to clarify how sex differences in PSP clinical progression vary by disease stage and to examine the contributions of co-pathology to these observed sex differences.

Clinical milestones as triggers for palliative care intervention in progressive Supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy

not required for reviews.

Normative Data for Brainstem Structures, the Midbrain-to-Pons Ratio, and the Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Imaging biomarkers derived from different brainstem structures are suggested to differentiate among parkinsonian disorders, but clinical implementation requires normative data. The main objective was to establish high-quality, sex-specific data for relevant brainstem structures derived from MR imaging in healthy subjects from the general population in their sixth and seventh decades of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

3D T1WI acquired on the same 1.5T scanner of 996 individuals (527 women) between 50 and 66 years of age from a prospective population study was used. The area of the midbrain and pons and the widths of the middle cerebellar peduncles and superior cerebellar peduncles were measured, from which the midbrain-to-pons ratio and Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index [MRPI = (Pons Area / Midbrain Area) × (Middle Cerebellar Peduncles / Superior Cerebellar Peduncles)] were calculated. Sex differences in brainstem measures and correlations to age, height, weight, and body mass index were investigated.

RESULTS

Inter- and intrareliability for measuring the different brainstem structures showed good-to-excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.785-0.988). There were significant sex differences for the pons area, width of the middle cerebellar peduncles and superior cerebellar peduncles, midbrain-to-pons ratio, and MRPI (all, P <  .001; Cohen D = 0.44-0.98), but not for the midbrain area (P = .985). There were significant very weak-to-weak correlations between several of the brainstem measures and age, height, weight, and body mass index in both sexes. However, no systematic difference in distribution caused by these variables was found, and because age had the highest and most consistent correlations, age-/sex-specific percentiles for the brainstem measures were created.

CONCLUSIONS

We present high-quality, sex-specific data and age-/sex-specific percentiles for the mentioned brainstem measures. These normative data can be implemented in the neuroradiologic work-up of patients with suspected brainstem atrophy to avoid the risk of misdiagnosis.