[Diagnosis and treatment of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis]

Comparison of local ablation with Albendazole or laparoscopic hepatectomy combined with Albendazole in the treatment of early hepatic alveolar echinococcosis

Background

Echinococcosis (E) is a zoonotic parasitic disease caused by the larval morphology of echinococcosis tapeworms. Among the recognized species, two are of medical importance-E. granulosus and E. multilocularis-causing cystic echinococcosis (CE) and alveolar echinococcosis (AE) in humans, respectively. Diagnosis of AE is based on clinical manifestation and epidemiological data, imaging techniques, histopathology and/or nucleic acid detection, and serology. At present, WHO guidelines suggest that benzimidazoles (BMZ) are mandatory in all AE patients, temporarily after complete resection of the lesions and for life in all other AE cases. Interventional procedures should be preferred to palliative surgery whenever possible, and radical surgery is the first choice in all cases suitable for total resection of the lesion. However, some research centers have proposed that local ablation (LA) including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) is no less effective than radical surgery or better than simple medication in the early stage hepatic AE (WHO-IWGE PNM classification of AE: P1N0M0). This study attempted to compare the real efficacy of the above treatment methods, so as to find the best treatment for this kind of patient.

Methods

The data of patients with hepatic AE who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH), RFA, and MWA in Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital from January 2015 to January 2021 were collected. At the same time, the cases treated with Albendazole (ABZ) were collected together with the institution for disease control and prevention. According to the treatment methods, the above cases were divided into LH group, RFA group, MWA group, and medication group. The basic data and postoperative recovery indices of the four groups were compared, respectively.

Results

A total of 199 patients with hepatic AE were enrolled in this study, including 90 males and 109 females. The youngest was 5 years old and the oldest was 66 years old, with an average of 33.41±14.64 years old. 20.6% of the patients had hepatitis B (41/ 199). A total of 45 patients underwent ultrasound-guided RFA, 47 patients underwent ultrasound-guided MWA, 51 patients were treated with ABZ, and 56 patients underwent LH. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among the four groups (p > 0.05). The RFA group and MWA group were more advantageous than the LH group regarding operation time and incidence of postoperative complications (p < 0.05). But recurrence rate of the lesion in the LH group was significantly lower than the RFA group, MWA group, and medication group. However, there was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival time among the four groups (p >0.05).

Conclusion

LH has a significant effect in the treatment of early-stage hepatic AE, especially in terms of recurrence which is significantly better than LA and medication alone. Follow-up and adherence to ABZ therapy are essential if conservative treatment is to achieve better outcomes.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Anatomic and Non-anatomic Hepatectomy for Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis: Clinical Experience of 240 Cases in a Single Center

Background

Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is a zoonotic parasitic disease. There are more than 16,000 new cases each year, approximately 60 million people are threatened, and the annual direct economic loss is RMB 3 billion. The prevalence of AE in some areas of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau is as high as 6.0%. Radical resection, including anatomic and non-anatomic hepatectomy, for advanced AE can significantly prolong the survival time of patients. However, there is no literature compared the efficacy of anatomic and non-anatomic hepatectomy. Therefore, by comparing various clinical evaluation indices between anatomic and non-anatomic hepatectomy, this study explored the short-term and long-term efficacy of these two surgical methods for AE.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with AE who underwent radical hepatectomy at Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital from January 2015 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical method, that were, non-anatomic hepatectomy group and anatomic hepatectomy group. We compared these two groups focusing on basic preoperative data, such as age, sex, lesion size, and liver function parameters; main intraoperative evaluation indices, such as operation time, intraoperative porta hepatis occlusion time, intraoperative blood loss, and blood transfusion; and postoperative recovery evaluation indicators, such as postoperative liver function, incidence of surgical complications, and AE recurrence.

Results

A total of 240 patients were enrolled in this study, including 123 in anatomic hepatectomy group and 117 in non-anatomic hepatectomy group. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between baseline characteristics. Anatomic hepatectomy group was advantageous than non-anatomic hepatectomy group regarding intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), blood transfusion (P < 0.001), and porta hepatis occlusion time (P < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in postoperative liver function (aspartate aminotransferase: P < 0.001; alanine aminotransferase: P < 0.001), surgical complications (P < 0.001), and AE recurrence rate (P = 0.003). The median survival of patients in the anatomic hepatectomy group was 66 months, compared to 65 months in the non-anatomic hepatectomy group (χ² = 4.662, P = 0.031).

Conclusions

Anatomic hepatectomy was not only safe for AE but also showed better short-term and long-term superiority than non-anatomic hepatectomy.

Nutritional status and screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients with hepatic echinococcosis

Background: Echinococcosis is a chronic consumptive liver disease. Little research has been carried out on the nutritional status of infected patients, though liver diseases are often associated with malnutrition. Our study investigated four different nutrition screening tools, to assess nutritional risks of hospitalized patients with echinococcosis. Methods: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Short Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and the Nutrition Risk Index (NRI) were used to assess 164 patients with alveolar echinococcosis (AE) and 232 with cystic echinococcosis (CE). Results were then compared with European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) criteria for malnutrition diagnosis. Results: According to ESPEN standards for malnutrition diagnosis, 29.2% of CE patients and 31.1% of AE patients were malnourished. The malnutrition risk rates for CE and AE patients were as follows: NRS 2002 – 40.3% and 30.7%; MUST – 51.5% and 50.9%; MNA-SF – 46.8% and 44.1%; and NRI – 51.1% and 67.4%. In patients with CE, MNA-SF and NRS 2002 results correlated well with ESPEN results (k = 0.515, 0.496). Area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of MNA-SF and NRS 2002 were 0.803 and 0.776, respectively. For patients with AE, NRS 2002 and MNA-SF results correlated well with ESPEN (k = 0.555, 0.493). AUC values of NRS 2002 and MNA-SF were 0.776 and 0.792, respectively. Conclusion: This study is the first to analyze hospitalized echinococcosis patients based on these nutritional screening tools. Our results suggest that NRS 2002 and MNA-SF are suitable tools for nutritional screening of inpatients with echinococcosis.

[Liver alveococcosis concurrent with hepatocellular carcinoma (autopsy observation)]

The paper presents a unique case of an autopsy study of the concurrence of two diseases, such as liver alveococcosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, in a 46-year-old woman with obvious hypercoagulability syndrome caused by parasitic invasion. It gives the macroscopic and histological characteristics of this case.

[Globalization: challenges in abdominal surgery for migrants and refugees]

The increasing number of refugees, migrants and international travelers influences the surgical spectrum of abdominal diseases. The aim of this review is to familiarize surgeons with specific diseases which are endemic in the patients' countries of origin and are likely to be diagnosed with increasing incidence in Germany. Low levels of hygiene in the countries of origin or refugee camps is associated with a high incidence of numerous infections, such as helminth infections, typhoid fever or amoebiasis, which if untreated can cause surgical emergencies. Historically, some of them were common in Germany but have been more or less eradicated because of the high socioeconomic standard. Echinococcosis and Chagas disease are frequently treated surgically while schistosomiasis can mimic intestinal cancer. Abdominal tuberculosis presents in a variety of abdominal pathologies and frequently causes diagnostic uncertainty. Sigmoid volvulus has a very low incidence among Europeans, but is one of the most common abdominal surgical conditions of adults in endemic countries. The number of patients who eventually undergo surgery for these conditions might be relatively low; however, surgeons must be aware of them and consider them as differential diagnoses in refugees and migrants with acute or chronic abdominal symptoms.