1
|
Hung YP, Lee CC, Ko WC. Effects of Inappropriate Administration of Empirical Antibiotics on Mortality in Adults With Bacteraemia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:869822. [PMID: 35712120 PMCID: PMC9197423 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.869822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Bloodstream infections are associated with high mortality rates and contribute substantially to healthcare costs, but a consensus on the prognostic benefits of appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) for bacteraemia is lacking. Methods We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases through July 2021. Studies comparing the mortality rates of patients receiving appropriate and inappropriate EAT were considered eligible. The quality of the included studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Results We ultimately assessed 198 studies of 89,962 total patients. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the prognostic impacts of inappropriate EAT was 2.06 (P < 0.001), and the funnel plot was symmetrically distributed. Among subgroups without between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0%), those of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock (OR, 2.14), Pitt bacteraemia scores of ≥4 (OR, 1.88), cirrhosis (OR, 2.56), older age (OR, 1.78), and community-onset/acquired Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia infection (OR, 2.53) indicated a significant effect of inappropriate EAT on mortality. The pooled adjusted OR of 125 studies using multivariable analyses for the effects of inappropriate EAT on mortality was 2.02 (P < 0.001), and the subgroups with low heterogeneity (I2 < 25%) exhibiting significant effects of inappropriate EAT were those of patients with vascular catheter infections (adjusted OR, 2.40), pneumonia (adjusted OR, 2.72), or Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia (adjusted OR, 4.35). Notably, the pooled univariable and multivariable analyses were consistent in revealing the negligible impacts of inappropriate EAT on the subgroups of patients with urinary tract infections and Enterobacter bacteraemia. Conclusion Although the current evidence is insufficient to demonstrate the benefits of prompt EAT in specific bacteraemic populations, we indicated that inappropriate EAT is associated with unfavorable mortality outcomes overall and in numerous subgroups. Prospective studies designed to test these specific populations are needed to ensure reliable conclusions. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021270274.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Pin Hung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tainan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tainan City, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chi Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan.,Clinical Medicine Research Centre, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chien Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kagami K, Ishiguro N, Yamada T, Niinuma Y, Iwasaki S, Taki K, Fukumoto T, Hayasaka K, Nishida M, Sugita J, Teshima T, Sugawara M, Takekuma Y. Clinical outcomes of intervention for carbapenems and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus antibiotics by an antimicrobial stewardship team. Am J Infect Control 2021; 49:1493-1498. [PMID: 34416316 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no reports on the effects of interventions, such as discontinuation and change and/or de-escalation of carbapenems and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiotics by an antimicrobial stewardship team focusing on detailed patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate these effects. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from December 2018 to November 2019. RESULTS Favorable clinical responses were obtained in 165 of 184 cases (89.7%) in the intervention-accepted group, higher than those in the not accepted group (14/19 cases, 73.7%; P = .056). All-cause 30 day mortality was lower in the accepted group than in the not accepted group (1.1% and 10.5%, respectively; P = .045). The microbiological outcomes were similar between the two groups. Duration of carbapenem and anti-MRSA antibiotic use in the accepted group was significantly lower than that in the not accepted group (median [interquartile range]: 8 days [5-13] versus 14 days [8-15], respectively, P = .026 for carbapenem; 10 days [5.3-15] vs 15.5 days [13.8-45.3], respectively, P = .014 for anti-MRSA antibiotic). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to investigate the effects of interventions such as discontinuation and change and/ or de-escalation of antibiotics on detailed outcomes. Our intervention could reduce the duration of carbapenem and anti-MRSA antibiotic use without worsening clinical and microbiological outcomes.
Collapse
|
3
|
Voiriot G, Fartoukh M, Durand-Zaleski I, Berard L, Rousseau A, Armand-Lefevre L, Verdet C, Argaud L, Klouche K, Megarbane B, Patrier J, Richard JC, Reignier J, Schwebel C, Souweine B, Tandjaoui-Lambiotte Y, Simon T, Timsit JF. Combined use of a broad-panel respiratory multiplex PCR and procalcitonin to reduce duration of antibiotics exposure in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (MULTI-CAP): a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, individual randomised trial conducted in French intensive care units. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048187. [PMID: 34408046 PMCID: PMC8375718 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION At the time of the worrying emergence and spread of bacterial resistance, reducing the selection pressure by reducing the exposure to antibiotics in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a public health issue. In this context, the combined use of molecular tests and biomarkers for guiding antibiotics discontinuation is attractive. Therefore, we have designed a trial comparing an integrated approach of diagnosis and treatment of severe CAP to usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The multiplex PCR and procalcitonin to reduce duration of antibiotics exposure in patients with severe-CAP (MULTI-CAP) trial is a multicentre (n=20), parallel-group, superiority, open-label, randomised trial. Patients are included if adult admitted to intensive care unit for a CAP. Diagnosis of pneumonia is based on clinical criteria and a newly appeared parenchymal infiltrate. Immunocompromised patients are excluded. Subjects are randomised (1:1 ratio) to either the intervention arm (experimental strategy) or the control arm (usual strategy). In the intervention arm, the microbiological diagnosis combines a respiratory multiplex PCR (mPCR) and conventional microbiological investigations. An algorithm of early antibiotic de-escalation or discontinuation is recommended, based on mPCR results and the procalcitonin value. In the control arm, only conventional microbiological investigations are performed and antibiotics de-escalation remains at the clinician's discretion. The primary endpoint is the number of days alive without any antibiotic from the randomisation to day 28. Based on our hypothesis of 2 days gain in the intervention arm, we aim to enrol a total of 450 patients over a 30-month period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The MULTI-CAP trial is conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, is registered in Clinical Trials and has been approved by the Committee for Protection of Persons and the National French Drug Safety Agency. Written informed consents are obtained from all the patients (or representatives). The results will be disseminated through educational institutions, submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication and presented at medical congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03452826; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Voiriot
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Muriel Fartoukh
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Laurence Berard
- Unité de Recherche Clinique de l'Est Parisien, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Alexandra Rousseau
- Unité de Recherche Clinique de l'Est Parisien, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Laurence Armand-Lefevre
- Département de Microbiologie, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Charlotte Verdet
- Département de Microbiologie, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Laurent Argaud
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Kada Klouche
- Intensive Care Medicine Department, Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Bruno Megarbane
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Juliette Patrier
- Service de Réanimation Infectieuse, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Richard
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Reignier
- Médecine intensive réanimation, CHU Nantes, Nantes, Pays de la Loire, France
| | - Carole Schwebel
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes, France
| | - Bertrand Souweine
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Yacine Tandjaoui-Lambiotte
- Service de Réanimation médico-chirurgicale, Hôpital Avicennes, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Tabassome Simon
- Clinical Research Platform (URC-CRB-CRC), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
- Clinical Pharmacology-Research Platform, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - Jean-François Timsit
- Service de Réanimation Infectieuse, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu X, Wu J, Wang P, Fang X, Yu Y, Tang J, Xiao Y, Wang M, Li S, Zhang Y, Hu B, Ma T, Li Q, Wang Z, Wu A, Liu C, Dai M, Ma X, Yi H, Kang Y, Wang D, Han G, Zhang P, Wang J, Yuan Y, Wang D, Wang J, Zhou Z, Ren Z, Liu Y, Guan X, Ren J. Diagnosis and Management of Intraabdominal Infection: Guidelines by the Chinese Society of Surgical Infection and Intensive Care and the Chinese College of Gastrointestinal Fistula Surgeons. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 71:S337-S362. [PMID: 33367581 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The Chinese guidelines for IAI presented here were developed by a panel that included experts from the fields of surgery, critical care, microbiology, infection control, pharmacology, and evidence-based medicine. All questions were structured in population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes format, and evidence profiles were generated. Recommendations were generated following the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system or Best Practice Statement (BPS), when applicable. The final guidelines include 45 graded recommendations and 17 BPSs, including the classification of disease severity, diagnosis, source control, antimicrobial therapy, microbiologic evaluation, nutritional therapy, other supportive therapies, diagnosis and management of specific IAIs, and recognition and management of source control failure. Recommendations on fluid resuscitation and organ support therapy could not be formulated and thus were not included. Accordingly, additional high-quality clinical studies should be performed in the future to address the clinicians' concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuwen Wu
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Wu
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.,BenQ Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Peige Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Xueling Fang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yunsong Yu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianguo Tang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yonghong Xiao
- Department of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Minggui Wang
- Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shikuan Li
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yun Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bijie Hu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhiming Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Anhua Wu
- Infection Control Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Menghua Dai
- Department of Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaochun Ma
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Huimin Yi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Kang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Daorong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China
| | - Gang Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jianzhong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Yufeng Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Dong Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Zeqiang Ren
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yuxiu Liu
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiangdong Guan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianan Ren
- Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kuwabara G, Yukawa S, Yamada K, Imoto W, Yamairi K, Shibata W, Yoshii N, Watanabe T, Asai K, Niki M, Nakaie K, Okada Y, Fujita A, Kaneko Y, Kawaguchi T, Kakeya H. The effect of intervention by an antimicrobial stewardship team on anaerobic bacteremia. Anaerobe 2020; 64:102214. [PMID: 32446953 DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The effect of antimicrobial stewardship (AS) on anaerobic bacteremia is uncertain. This study aimed to assess the effect of interventions by the AS team (AST) on clinical and microbiological outcomes and antimicrobial use. An AS program was introduced at Osaka City University Hospital in January 2014; an interdisciplinary AST was established. We enrolled patients with anaerobic bacteremia between January 2009 and December 2018. Patients were classified into the pre-intervention group (from January 2009 to December 2013) and the post-intervention group (from January 2014 to December 2018). A significant decrease in definitive carbapenem use (P = 0.0242) and an increase in empiric tazobactam/piperacillin use (P = 0.0262) were observed in the post-intervention group. The de-escalation rate increased significantly from 9.38% to 32.7% (P = 0.0316) in the post-intervention group. The susceptibility of Bacteroides species and 30-day mortality did not worsen in the post-intervention group. These results showed that interventions by an AST can reduce carbapenem use and increase the de-escalation rate without worsening patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaku Kuwabara
- Department of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Satomi Yukawa
- Department of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Koichi Yamada
- Department of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Waki Imoto
- Department of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Kazushi Yamairi
- Department of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Wataru Shibata
- Department of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Naoko Yoshii
- Department of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Watanabe
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Kazuhisa Asai
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Makoto Niki
- Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Nakaie
- Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Yasuyo Okada
- Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Akiko Fujita
- Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Kaneko
- Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Bacteriology, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Tomoya Kawaguchi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kakeya
- Department of Infection Control Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van Heijl I, Schweitzer VA, Van Der Linden PD, Bonten MJM, Van Werkhoven CH. Impact of antimicrobial de-escalation on mortality: a literature review of study methodology and recommendations for observational studies. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2020; 18:405-413. [PMID: 32178545 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1743683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The safety of de-escalation of empirical antimicrobial therapy is largely based on observational data, with many reporting protective effects on mortality. As there is no plausible biological explanation for this phenomenon, it is most probably caused by confounding by indication.Areas covered: We evaluate the methodology used in observational studies on the effects of de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy on mortality. We extended the search for a recent systematic review and identified 52 observational studies. The heterogeneity in study populations was large. Only 19 (36.5%) studies adjusted for confounders and four (8%) adjusted for clinical stability during admission, all as a fixed variable. All studies had methodological limitations, most importantly the lack of adjustment for clinical stability, causing bias toward a protective effect.Expert opinion: The methodology used in studies evaluating the effects of de-escalation on mortality requires improvement. We depicted all potential confounders in a directed acyclic graph to illustrate all associations between exposure (de-escalation) and outcome (mortality). Clinical stability is an important confounder in this association and should be modeled as a time-varying variable. We recommend to include de-escalation as time-varying exposure and use inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted marginal structural models to properly adjust for time-varying confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inger Van Heijl
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum/Blaricum, The Netherlands.,Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Valentijn A Schweitzer
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul D Van Der Linden
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum/Blaricum, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J M Bonten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H Van Werkhoven
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sadyrbaeva-Dolgova S, Aznarte-Padial P, Jimenez-Morales A, Expósito-Ruiz M, Calleja-Hernández MÁ, Hidalgo-Tenorio C. Pharmacist recommendations for carbapenem de-escalation in urinary tract infection within an antimicrobial stewardship program. J Infect Public Health 2019; 13:558-563. [PMID: 31685404 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbapenem antibiotics are considered the treatment of choice for serious extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria infections. Our objectives were to analyze the results of carbapenem de-escalation therapy in complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) attended in a third-level Spanish hospital and to evaluate the impact of pharmacist recommendation in this practice, the outcomes obtained, and associated factors. METHODS This prospective observational study of carbapenem prescriptions and de-escalation performance was conducted in a third-level hospital between August 1 2013 and July 31, 2014. Data were gathered on carbapenem treatment duration, de-escalation, length of hospital stay, mortality rate, and associated re-admissions. RESULTS De-escalation, which was only ordered for patients with positive cultures, was conducted in 49.7% of the 163 patients with complicated UTI. More than half (69.1%) of pharmacist interventions were accepted. De-escalation reduced the median hospital stay by five days (p=0.030). Crude hospital mortality was lower in the de-escalation group (7.4% vs. 29.3%, p<0.001), although their exposure to carbapenems was lower (4 vs 6 days, p<0.001). Factors associated with de-escalation were ICU stay for at least 48h, pharmacist recommendation and ESBL or AmpC producing Enterobacteriaceae. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality were age, previous admission and duration of hospital stay, but not pharmacist recommendation. Otherwise, carbapenem de-escalation was associated as a protective factor against in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS Carbapenem de-escalation in accordance with pharmacist recommendation proved to be a safe approach in complicated UTI, reducing the hospital stay of patients without affecting the re-admission rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pilar Aznarte-Padial
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Impact of an automated antibiotic time-out alert on the de-escalation of broad-spectrum antibiotics at a large community teaching hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019; 40:1287-1289. [PMID: 31436144 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2019.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Broad-spectrum antibiotic de-escalation before and after implementation of a 72-hour antibiotic time-out alert within the electronic medical record was analyzed. De-escalation occurred significantly more often after the implementation of the alert (55.0% vs 35.1%; 95% confidence interval, -0.3491 to -0.0488; P < .01).
Collapse
|
9
|
Mathieu C, Pastene B, Cassir N, Martin-Loeches I, Leone M. Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation as a clinical strategy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2018; 17:79-88. [PMID: 30570361 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1561275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION De-escalation is a widely recommended strategy in regard to guidelines, with an associated adherence to guidelines being around 50%. This review discusses data supporting de-escalation and possible obstacles for its implementation. Areas covered: Although it does not have a consensual definition, de-escalation consists of reducing the spectrum of empirical antimicrobial treatment based on the microbiological findings. Many observational studies have suggested that this strategy is likely safe and efficient for treating various types of infection. However, randomized controlled trials published as of now have not shown any improvement on the outcomes. Regarding the adverse effects of de-escalation on ecological pressure and multidrug resistance emergence, the data are contradictory. The implementation of new techniques, such as rapid diagnosis, can help guide clinicians. Expert opinion: De-escalation should be included as part of a large antibiotic stewardship program to balance the risk and benefit of each administration, and each physician prescribing antibiotics should be challenged for the quality of her/his prescription on a daily basis. In the future, one of our duties will involve determining whether a delay of antimicrobial treatment - making it possible to improve diagnostic performance and obtain the first laboratory results - is either safe or unsafe for our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calypso Mathieu
- a Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Service d'anesthésie et de réanimation , Aix-Marseille Université , Marseille , France
| | - Bruno Pastene
- a Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Service d'anesthésie et de réanimation , Aix-Marseille Université , Marseille , France
| | - Nadim Cassir
- b IRD, APHM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection , Aix-Marseille Université , Marseille , France
| | - Ignacio Martin-Loeches
- c Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO) , St James's Hospital , Dublin , Ireland
| | - Marc Leone
- a Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Service d'anesthésie et de réanimation , Aix-Marseille Université , Marseille , France.,b IRD, APHM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection , Aix-Marseille Université , Marseille , France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leong HN, Kurup A, Tan MY, Kwa ALH, Liau KH, Wilcox MH. Management of complicated skin and soft tissue infections with a special focus on the role of newer antibiotics. Infect Drug Resist 2018; 11:1959-1974. [PMID: 30464538 PMCID: PMC6208867 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s172366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) represent the severe form of infectious disease that involves deeper soft tissues. Involvement of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) further complicates cSSTI with increased hospitalization, health care costs, and overall mortality. Various international guidelines provide recommendations on the management of cSSTIs, with the inclusion of newer antibiotics. This literature-based review discusses the overall management of cSSTI, including appropriate use of antibiotics in clinical practice. Successful treatment of cSSTIs starts with early and precise diagnosis, including identification of causative pathogen and its load, determination of infection severity, associated complications, and risk factors. The current standard-of-care for cSSTIs involves incision, drainage, surgical debridement, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, and supportive care. In recent years, the emergence of newer antibiotics (eg, ceftaroline, tigecycline, daptomycin, linezolid, etc) has provided clinicians wider options of antimicrobial therapy. Selection of antibiotics should be based on the drug characteristics, effectiveness, safety, and treatment costs, alongside other aspects such as host factors and local multidrug resistance rates. However, larger studies on newer antibiotics are warranted to refine the decision making on the appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Local Antimicrobial Stewardship Program strategies in health care settings could guide clinicians for early initiation of specific treatments to combat region-specific antimicrobial resistance, minimize adverse effects, and to improve outcomes such as reduction in Clostridium difficile infections. These strategies involving iv-to-oral switch, de-escalation to narrow-spectrum antibiotics, and dose optimization have an impact on the overall improvement of cSSTI therapy outcomes, especially in countries like Singapore that has a high disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoe Nam Leong
- Rophi Clinic, Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Centre, Singapore, Singapore,
| | - Asok Kurup
- Infectious Diseases Care Private Ltd, Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mak Yong Tan
- My Orthopaedic Clinic, Gleneagles Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrea Lay Hoon Kwa
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Emerging Infectious Diseases Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kui Hin Liau
- LIAU KH Specialist Clinic, Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mark H Wilcox
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yanai M, Ogasawara M, Hayashi Y, Suzuki K, Takahashi H, Satomura A. Impact of interventions by an antimicrobial stewardship program team on appropriate antimicrobial therapy in patients with bacteremic urinary tract infection. J Infect Chemother 2017; 24:206-211. [PMID: 29141775 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy often leads to poor outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) team on appropriate therapy, in patients with bacteremic urinary tract infection (UTI). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the interventions by the ASP team in 807 patients with bacteremic UTI. Interventions were divided into 3 groups: group A (conventional report), group B (conventional report and written alert on the chart), and group C (conventional report and oral recommendation with/without written alert). The appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy was assessed at 2 time points, based on blood culture results. RESULTS The ASP team estimated that 166 and 576 patients received inappropriate antimicrobial therapy based on the results of Gram staining, and final report, respectively. Appropriate therapy after intervention was administered to 53.2% of group A, 63.5% of group B, and 89.3% of group C patients, respectively. Mortality was significantly lower in patients of de-escalation than in those with no antimicrobial changes, without prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSION This study provides one plausible benchmark for appropriate antimicrobial therapy by ASP, while observer bias and survivor treatment selection bias exist, and further studies including evaluation for severity are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Yanai
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
| | - Maiko Ogasawara
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
| | - Yuta Hayashi
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
| | - Kiyozumi Suzuki
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
| | - Hiromichi Takahashi
- Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
| | - Atsushi Satomura
- Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de With K, Allerberger F, Amann S, Apfalter P, Brodt HR, Eckmanns T, Fellhauer M, Geiss HK, Janata O, Krause R, Lemmen S, Meyer E, Mittermayer H, Porsche U, Presterl E, Reuter S, Sinha B, Strauß R, Wechsler-Fördös A, Wenisch C, Kern WV. Strategies to enhance rational use of antibiotics in hospital: a guideline by the German Society for Infectious Diseases. Infection 2017; 44:395-439. [PMID: 27066980 PMCID: PMC4889644 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-016-0885-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction In the time of increasing resistance and paucity of new drug development there is a growing need for strategies to enhance rational use of antibiotics in German and Austrian hospitals. An evidence-based guideline on recommendations for implementation of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programmes was developed by the German Society for Infectious Diseases in association with the following societies, associations and institutions: German Society of Hospital Pharmacists, German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology, Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy, The Austrian Association of Hospital Pharmacists, Austrian Society for Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Austrian Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Robert Koch Institute. Materials and methods A structured literature research was performed in the databases EMBASE, BIOSIS, MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library from January 2006 to November 2010 with an update to April 2012 (MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library). The grading of recommendations in relation to their evidence is according to the AWMF Guidance Manual and Rules for Guideline Development. Conclusion The guideline provides the grounds for rational use of antibiotics in hospital to counteract antimicrobial resistance and to improve the quality of care of patients with infections by maximising clinical outcomes while minimising toxicity. Requirements for a successful implementation of ABS programmes as well as core and supplemental ABS strategies are outlined. The German version of the guideline was published by the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in December 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K de With
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - F Allerberger
- Division Public Health, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria
| | - S Amann
- Hospital Pharmacy, Munich Municipal Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - P Apfalter
- Institute for Hygiene, Microbiology and Tropical Medicine (IHMT), National Reference Centre for Nosocomial Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Elisabethinen Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - H-R Brodt
- Department of Infectious Disease Medical Clinic II, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - T Eckmanns
- Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Fellhauer
- Hospital Pharmacy, Schwarzwald-Baar Hospital, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
| | - H K Geiss
- Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infectiology, Sana Kliniken AG, Ismaning, Germany
| | - O Janata
- Department for Hygiene and Infection Control, Danube Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Krause
- Section of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - S Lemmen
- Division of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Meyer
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - H Mittermayer
- Institute for Hygiene, Microbiology and Tropical Medicine (IHMT), National Reference Centre for Nosocomial Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Elisabethinen Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - U Porsche
- Department for Clinical Pharmacy and Drug Information, Landesapotheke, Landeskliniken Salzburg (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
| | - E Presterl
- Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Reuter
- Clinic for General Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Pneumology and Osteology, Klinikum Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - B Sinha
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R Strauß
- Department of Medicine 1, Gastroenterology, Pneumology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Wechsler-Fördös
- Department of Antibiotics and Infection Control, Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Wenisch
- Medical Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - W V Kern
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fu R, Chen T, Song J, Wang G, Li L, Ruan E, Liu H, Wang Y, Wang H, Xing L, Wu Y, Liu H, Qu W, Shao Z. De-escalation empirical antibiotic therapy improved survival for patients with severe aplastic anemia treated with antithymocyte globulin. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e5905. [PMID: 28178130 PMCID: PMC5312987 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000005905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2016] [Revised: 12/13/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of de-escalation empirical therapy for controlling infection in patients with severe aplastic anaemia (SAA) treated with antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Eighty-seven ATG-treated SAA patients who had microbiological culture-confirmed infections from 2006 to 2015 in our center were retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy of de-escalation and non-de-escalation therapy was compared. Among all 87 patients, 63 patients were treated with de-escalation therapy and 24 patients with non-de-escalation therapy. More patients showed response to anti-infection treatment in de-escalation group than in non-de-escalation group both on day 7 (60.32% vs. 25.00%, P = 0.003) and on day 30 (79.37% vs. 58.33%, P = 0.047) since the initial antimicrobial therapy. On day 30, more patients had increased absolute neutrophil count in de-escalation group compared with non-de-escalation group (76.19% vs. 45.83%, P = 0.007), and de-escalation group had lower morality rate (17.46% vs. 37.50%, P = 0.047) and better survival outcome (P = 0.023) on day 90. Twenty-three patients in de-escalation group and 5 patients in non-escalation group received granulocyte transfusions. Granulocyte transfusions helped to control infections in both de-escalation group (P = 0.027) and non-de-escalation group (P = 0.042) on day 7, but did not improve survival on day 90. We concluded that de-escalation antibiotics improved survival in SAA patients after ATG treatment. Early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics pending microbiological cultures combined with a commitment to change to narrow-spectrum antibiotics should be recommended for controlling infections in SAA patients treated with ATG. Granulocyte transfusions might be an adjunctive therapy in controlling infections.
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu P, Ohl C, Johnson J, Williamson J, Beardsley J, Luther V. Frequency of empiric antibiotic de-escalation in an acute care hospital with an established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16:751. [PMID: 27955625 PMCID: PMC5153830 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-2080-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Expanding antimicrobial resistance patterns in the face of stagnant growth in novel antibiotic production underscores the importance of antibiotic stewardship in which de-escalation remains an integral component. We measured the frequency of antibiotic de-escalation in a tertiary care medical center with an established antimicrobial stewardship program to provide a plausible benchmark for de-escalation. METHODS A retrospective, observational study was performed by review of randomly selected electronic medical records of 240 patients who received simultaneous piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin from January to December 2011 at an 885-bed tertiary care medical center. Patient characteristics including antibiotic regimen, duration and indication, culture results, length of stay, and hospital mortality were evaluated. Antibiotic de-escalation was defined as the use of narrower spectrum antibiotics or the discontinuation of antibiotics after initiation of piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin therapy. Subjects dying within 72 h of antibiotic initiation were considered not de-escalated for subsequent analysis and were subtracted from the study population in determining a modified mortality rate. RESULTS The most commonly documented indications for piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin therapy were pneumonia and sepsis. Of the 240 patients studied, 151 (63%) had their antibiotic regimens de-escalated by 72 h. The proportion of patients de-escalated by 96 h with positive vs. negative cultures was similar, 71 and 72%, respectively. Median length of stay was 4 days shorter in de-escalated patients, and the difference in adjusted mortality was not significant (p = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS The empiric antibiotic regimens of approximately two-thirds of patients were de-escalated by 72 h in an institution with a well-established antimicrobial stewardship program. While this study provides one plausible benchmark for antibiotic de-escalation, further studies, including evaluations of antibiotic appropriateness and patient outcomes, are needed to inform decisions on potential benchmarks for antibiotic de-escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Liu
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
| | - Christopher Ohl
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Section on Infectious Diseases, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - James Johnson
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - John Williamson
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - James Beardsley
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Vera Luther
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Section on Infectious Diseases, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Guo Y, Gao W, Yang H, Ma C, Sui S. De-escalation of empiric antibiotics in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: A meta-analysis. Heart Lung 2016; 45:454-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2016] [Revised: 05/29/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
16
|
Salahuddin N, Amer L, Joseph M, El Hazmi A, Hawa H, Maghrabi K. Determinants of Deescalation Failure in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Crit Care Res Pract 2016; 2016:6794861. [PMID: 27493799 PMCID: PMC4963586 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6794861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2016] [Revised: 06/11/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Deescalation refers to either discontinuation or a step-down of antimicrobials. Despite strong recommendations in the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines (2012) to deescalate, actual practices can vary. Our objective was to identify variables that are associated with deescalation failure. Methods. In this prospective study of patients with sepsis/septic shock, patients were categorized into 4 groups based on antibiotic administration: no change in antibiotics, deescalation, escalation (where antibiotics were changed to those with a broader spectrum of antimicrobial coverage), or mixed changes (where both escalation to a broader spectrum of coverage and discontinuation of antibiotics were carried out). Results. 395 patients were studied; mean APACHE II score was 24 ± 7.8. Antimicrobial deescalation occurred in 189 (48%) patients; no changes were made in 156 (39%) patients. On multivariate regression analysis, failure to deescalate was significantly predicted by hematologic malignancy OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-7.4) p < 0.004, fungal sepsis OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.2-5.8) p = 0.011, multidrug resistance OR 2.9 (95% CI 1.4-6.0) p = 0.003, baseline serum procalcitonin OR 1.01 (95% CI 1.003-1.016) p = 0.002, and SAPS II scores OR 1.01 (95% CI 1.004-1.02) p = 0.006. Conclusions. Current deescalation practices reflect physician reluctance when dealing with complicated, sicker patients or with drug-resistance or fungal sepsis. Integrating an antibiotic stewardship program may increase physician confidence and provide support towards increasing deescalation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nawal Salahuddin
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| | - Lama Amer
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mini Joseph
- Department of Nursing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alya El Hazmi
- Adult Critical Care Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan Hawa
- Adult Critical Care Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Maghrabi
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ohji G, Doi A, Yamamoto S, Iwata K. Is de-escalation of antimicrobials effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis 2016; 49:71-9. [PMID: 27292606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2016] [Revised: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND De-escalation therapy is a strategy used widely to treat infections while avoiding the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. However, there is a paucity of clinical evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of de-escalation therapy compared to conventional therapy. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on de-escalation therapy for a variety of infections. A search of the MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 2015 for relevant studies was performed. The primary outcome was relevant mortality, such as 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. A meta-analysis was to be conducted for the pooled odds ratio using the random-effects model when possible. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included in the analysis. RESULTS A total of 23 studies were included in the analysis. There was no difference in mortality for most infections, and some studies favored de-escalation over non-de-escalation for better survival. The quality of most studies included was not high. CONCLUSIONS This review and analysis suggests that de-escalation therapy is safe and effective for most infections, although higher quality studies are needed in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goh Ohji
- Division of Infectious Diseases Therapeutics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kusunokicho 7-5-2, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan
| | - Asako Doi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Shungo Yamamoto
- Division of Infectious Diseases Therapeutics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kusunokicho 7-5-2, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan
| | - Kentaro Iwata
- Division of Infectious Diseases Therapeutics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kusunokicho 7-5-2, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Paul M, Dickstein Y, Raz-Pasteur A. Antibiotic de-escalation for bloodstream infections and pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016; 22:960-967. [PMID: 27283148 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Revised: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Antibiotic de-escalation is an appealing strategy in antibiotic stewardship programmes. We aimed to assess its safety and effects using a systematic review and meta-analysis. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing adults with bacteraemia, microbiologically documented pneumonia or severe sepsis, comparing between antibiotic de-escalation and no de-escalation. De-escalation was defined as changing an initially covering antibiotic regimen to a narrower spectrum regimen based on antibiotic susceptibility testing results within 96 hours. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. A search of published articles and conference proceedings was last updated in September 2015. Crude and adjusted ORs with 95% CI were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Sixteen observational studies and three RCTs were included. Risk of bias related to confounding was high in the observational studies. De-escalation was associated with fewer deaths in the unadjusted analysis (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.73), 19 studies, moderate heterogeneity. In the adjusted analysis there was no significant difference in mortality (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.59-1.16), 11 studies, moderate heterogeneity and the RCTs showed non-significant increased mortality with de-escalation (OR 1.73, 95% 0.97-3.06), three trials, no heterogeneity. There was a significant unadjusted association between de-escalation and survival in bacteraemia/severe sepsis (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.67) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.95), but not with other pneumonia (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.45-2.12). Only two studies reported on the emergence of resistance with inconsistent findings. Observational studies suggest lower mortality with antibiotic susceptibility testing-based de-escalation for bacteraemia, severe sepsis and ventilator-associated pneumonia that was not demonstrated in RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Paul
- Infectious Diseases Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus and The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Y Dickstein
- Infectious Diseases Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus and The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - A Raz-Pasteur
- Infectious Diseases Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus and The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Medicine A, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Madaras-Kelly K, Jones M, Remington R, Caplinger CM, Huttner B, Jones B, Samore M. Antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for healthcare-associated pneumonia within the Veterans Healthcare Administration. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015; 71:539-46. [PMID: 26538501 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkv338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Accepted: 09/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to measure quantitatively antimicrobial de-escalation utilizing electronic medication administration data based on the spectrum of activity for antimicrobial therapy (i.e. spectrum score) to identify variables associated with de-escalation in a nationwide healthcare system. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for healthcare-associated pneumonia was conducted in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (n = 119). Patients hospitalized for healthcare-associated pneumonia on acute-care wards between 5 and 14 days who received antimicrobials for ≥ 3 days during calendar years 2008-11 were evaluated. The spectrum score method was applied at the patient level to measure de-escalation on day 4 of hospitalization. De-escalation was expressed in aggregate and facility-level proportions. Logistic regression was used to assess variables associated with de-escalation. ORs with 95% CIs were reported. RESULTS Among 9319 patients, the de-escalation proportion was 28.3% (95% CI 27.4-29.2), which varied 6-fold across facilities [median (IQR) facility-level de-escalation proportion 29.1% (95% CI 21.7-35.6)]. Variables associated with de-escalation included initial broad-spectrum therapy (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.5 for each 10% increase in spectrum), collection of respiratory tract cultures (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2) and care in higher complexity facilities (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). Respiratory tract cultures were collected from 35.3% (95% CI 32.7-37.7) of patients. CONCLUSIONS De-escalation of antimicrobial therapy was limited and varied substantially across facilities. De-escalation was associated with respiratory tract culture collection and treatment in a high complexity-level facility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Madaras-Kelly
- Boise Veterans Affairs Medical Center, T111, 500 W. Fort Street, Boise, ID 83702, USA College of Pharmacy, Idaho State University, Meridian, ID, USA
| | - Makoto Jones
- George E. Whalen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Richard Remington
- Boise Veterans Affairs Medical Center, T111, 500 W. Fort Street, Boise, ID 83702, USA Quantified Inc., Boise, ID, USA
| | - Christina M Caplinger
- Boise Veterans Affairs Medical Center, T111, 500 W. Fort Street, Boise, ID 83702, USA College of Pharmacy, Idaho State University, Meridian, ID, USA
| | - Benedikt Huttner
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control Program, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Jones
- George E. Whalen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Matthew Samore
- George E. Whalen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Weiss E, Zahar JR, Lesprit P, Ruppe E, Leone M, Chastre J, Lucet JC, Paugam-Burtz C, Brun-Buisson C, Timsit JF, Brun-Buisson C, Bruneel F, Chastre J, Lasocki S, Leone M, Montravers P, Nseir S, Paugam-Burtz C, Pease S, Timsit JF, Weiss E, Wolff M, Alfandari S, Fantin B, Gachot B, Lesprit P, Lucet JC, Potel G, Pulcini C, Rabaud C, Tattevin P, Armand-Lefevre L, Cavallo JD, Jarlier V, Joint-Lambert O, Robert J, Ruppé E, Woerther PL. Elaboration of a consensual definition of de-escalation allowing a ranking of β-lactams. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015; 21:649.e1-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2014] [Revised: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/05/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
21
|
Carugati M, Franzetti F, Wiemken T, Kelley RR, Kelly R, Peyrani P, Blasi F, Ramirez J, Aliberti S. De-escalation therapy among bacteraemic patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015; 21:936.e11-8. [PMID: 26115864 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2015] [Revised: 06/05/2015] [Accepted: 06/12/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
There is no evidence supporting the use of de-escalation therapy (DET) among patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We assessed the outcomes associated with DET among bacteraemic CAP patients. We performed a secondary analysis of the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization database, which contains data on 660 bacteraemic patients hospitalized because of CAP in 35 countries (2001-2013). Exclusion criteria were death within 72 h from admission and an inappropriate empirical antibiotic regimen. DET was defined as changing an appropriate empirical broad-spectrum regimen to a narrower-spectrum regimen according to culture results within 7 days from hospital admission. Two study groups were identified: patients whose antibiotic therapy was de-escalated (the DET group), and patients whose antibiotic therapy was not de-escalated (the N-DET group). The primary study outcome was 30-day mortality. Two hundred and sixty-one bacteraemic CAP patients were included. Gram-positive bacteria were responsible for 88.1% of the cases (Streptococcus pneumoniae, 75.9%). Gram-negative bacteria were responsible for for 7.3% of the cases. DET was performed in 165 patients (63.2%). The N-DET group was characterized by a more severe presentation at admission. After adjustment for confounders, DET was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. DET seems to be safe among bacteraemic patients with CAP. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to further explore these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Carugati
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - F Franzetti
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - T Wiemken
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | | | - R Kelly
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - P Peyrani
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - F Blasi
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - J Ramirez
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - S Aliberti
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milano - Bicocca, Respiratory Unit, AO San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lew KY, Ng TM, Tan M, Tan SH, Lew EL, Ling LM, Ang B, Lye D, Teng CB. Safety and clinical outcomes of carbapenem de-escalation as part of an antimicrobial stewardship programme in an ESBL-endemic setting. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 70:1219-25. [PMID: 25473028 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of patients who received carbapenem de-escalation as guided by an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) in a setting where ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae are endemic. METHODS Patients receiving meropenem or imipenem underwent a prospective ASP review for eligibility for de-escalation according to defined institutional guidelines. Patients in whom carbapenem was de-escalated or not de-escalated, representing the acceptance and rejection of the ASP recommendation, respectively, were compared. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate; secondary outcomes included the 30 day readmission and mortality rates, the duration of carbapenem therapy, the incidence of adverse drug reactions due to antimicrobials, the acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and the occurrence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD). RESULTS The de-escalation recommendations for 300 patients were evaluated; 204 (68.0%) were accepted. The patient demographics and disease severity were similar. The clinical success rates were similar [de-escalated versus not de-escalated, 183/204 (89.7%) versus 85/96 (88.5%), P=0.84], as was the survival at hospital discharge [173/204 (84.8%) versus 79/96 (82.3%), P=0.58]. In the de-escalated group, the duration of carbapenem therapy was shorter (6 versus 8 days, P<0.001), the rate of adverse drug reactions was lower [11/204 (5.4%) versus 12/96 (12.5%), P=0.037], there was less diarrhoea [9/204 (4.4%) versus 12/96 (12.5%), P=0.015], there was a lower incidence of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii acquisition [4/204 (2.0%) versus 7/96 (7.3%), P=0.042] and there was a lower incidence of CDAD [2/204 (1.0%) versus 4/96 (4.2%), P=0.081]. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the ASP-guided de-escalation of carbapenems led to comparable clinical success, fewer adverse effects and a lower incidence of the development of resistance. This approach is safe and practicable, and should be a key component of an ASP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaung Yuan Lew
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, 117543 Singapore
| | - Tat Ming Ng
- Department of Pharmacy, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng 308433, Singapore
| | - Michelle Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng 308433, Singapore
| | - Sock Hoon Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng 308433, Singapore
| | - Ee Ling Lew
- Department of Pharmacy, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng 308433, Singapore
| | - Li Min Ling
- Communicable Disease Center, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Department of Infectious Disease, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng 308433, Singapore
| | - Brenda Ang
- Communicable Disease Center, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Department of Infectious Disease, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng 308433, Singapore
| | - David Lye
- Communicable Disease Center, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Department of Infectious Disease, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng 308433, Singapore Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road 119228, Singapore
| | - Christine B Teng
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, 117543 Singapore Department of Pharmacy, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng 308433, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Timsit JF, Soubirou JF, Voiriot G, Chemam S, Neuville M, Mourvillier B, Sonneville R, Mariotte E, Bouadma L, Wolff M. Treatment of bloodstream infections in ICUs. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14:489. [PMID: 25431091 PMCID: PMC4289315 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2014] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are frequent in ICU and is a prognostic factor of severe sepsis. Community acquired BSIs usually due to susceptible bacteria should be clearly differentiated from healthcare associated BSIs frequently due to resistant hospital strains. Early adequate treatment is key and should use guidelines and direct examination of samples performed from the infectious source. Previous antibiotic therapy knowledge, history of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) carriage are other major determinants of first choice antimicrobials in heathcare-associated and nosocomial BSIs. Initial antimicrobial dose should be adapted to pharmacokinetic knowledge. In general, a high dose is recommended at the beginning of treatment. If MDRO is suspected combination antibiotic therapy is mandatory because it increase the spectrum of treatment. Most of time, combination should be pursued no more than 2 to 5 days. Given the negative impact of useless antimicrobials, maximal effort should be done to decrease the antibiotic selection pressure. De-escalation from a broad spectrum to a narrow spectrum antimicrobial decreases the antibiotic selection pressure without negative impact on mortality. Duration of therapy should be shortened as often as possible especially when organism is susceptible, when the infection source has been totally controlled.
Collapse
|
24
|
Oda S, Aibiki M, Ikeda T, Imaizumi H, Endo S, Ochiai R, Kotani J, Shime N, Nishida O, Noguchi T, Matsuda N, Hirasawa H. The Japanese guidelines for the management of sepsis. J Intensive Care 2014; 2:55. [PMID: 25705413 PMCID: PMC4336273 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-014-0055-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2014] [Accepted: 09/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This is a guideline for the management of sepsis, developed by the Sepsis Registry Committee of The Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (JSICM) launched in March 2007. This guideline was developed on the basis of evidence-based medicine and focuses on unique treatments in Japan that have not been included in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (SSCG), as well as treatments that are viewed differently in Japan and in Western countries. Although the methods in this guideline conform to the 2008 SSCG, the Japanese literature and the results of the Sepsis Registry Survey, which was performed twice by the Sepsis Registry Committee in intensive care units (ICUs) registered with JSICM, are also referred. This is the first and original guideline for sepsis in Japan and is expected to be properly used in daily clinical practice. This article is translated from Japanese, originally published as “The Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis” in the Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (J Jpn Soc Intensive Care Med), 2013; 20:124–73. The original work is at http://dx.doi.org/10.3918/jsicm.20.124.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeto Oda
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba 260-8677 Japan
| | - Mayuki Aibiki
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295 Japan
| | - Toshiaki Ikeda
- Division of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, 1163 Tatemachi, Hachioji, Tokyo 193-0998 Japan
| | - Hitoshi Imaizumi
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S1 W17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8556 Japan
| | - Shigeatsu Endo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate 020-0023 Japan
| | - Ryoichi Ochiai
- First Department of Anesthesia, Toho University School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541 Japan
| | - Joji Kotani
- Department of Emergency, Disaster and Critical Care Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawacho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8131 Japan
| | - Nobuaki Shime
- Division of Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
| | - Osamu Nishida
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192 Japan
| | - Takayuki Noguchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Oita University School of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hazamacho, Yufu, Oita 879-5593 Japan
| | - Naoyuki Matsuda
- Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550 Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vitrat V, Hautefeuille S, Janssen C, Bougon D, Sirodot M, Pagani L. Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients. Infect Drug Resist 2014; 7:261-71. [PMID: 25349478 PMCID: PMC4208492 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s44357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Critically ill patients with infection in the intensive care unit (ICU) would certainly benefit from timely bacterial identification and effective antimicrobial treatment. Diagnostic techniques have clearly improved in the last years and allow earlier identification of bacterial strains in some cases, but these techniques are still quite expensive and not readily available in all institutions. Moreover, the ever increasing rates of resistance to antimicrobials, especially in Gram-negative pathogens, are threatening the outcome for such patients because of the lack of effective medical treatment; ICU physicians are therefore resorting to combination therapies to overcome resistance, with the direct consequence of promoting further resistance. A more appropriate use of available antimicrobials in the ICU should be pursued, and adjustments in doses and dosing through pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have recently shown promising results in improving outcomes and reducing antimicrobial resistance. The aim of multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship programs is to improve antimicrobial prescription, and in this review we analyze the available experiences of such programs carried out in ICUs, with emphasis on results, challenges, and pitfalls. Any effective intervention aimed at improving antibiotic usage in ICUs must be brought about at the present time; otherwise, we will face the challenge of intractable infections in critically ill patients in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Vitrat
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Infectious Diseases Unit, Annecy, France
| | - Serge Hautefeuille
- Intensive Care Unit, Annecy-Genevois Hospital Center (CHANGE), Annecy, France
| | - Cécile Janssen
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Infectious Diseases Unit, Annecy, France
| | - David Bougon
- Intensive Care Unit, Annecy-Genevois Hospital Center (CHANGE), Annecy, France
| | - Michel Sirodot
- Intensive Care Unit, Annecy-Genevois Hospital Center (CHANGE), Annecy, France
| | - Leonardo Pagani
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Infectious Diseases Unit, Annecy, France ; Infectious Diseases Unit, Bolzano Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Khasawneh FA, Karim A, Mahmood T, Ahmed S, Jaffri SF, Mehmood M. Safety and feasibility of antibiotic de-escalation in bacteremic pneumonia. Infect Drug Resist 2014; 7:177-82. [PMID: 25061323 PMCID: PMC4085320 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s65928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antibiotic de-escalation is a potential strategy advocated to conserve the effectiveness of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and feasibility of antibiotic de-escalation in patients admitted with bacteremic pneumonia. Methods A retrospective chart review was done for patients with bacteremic pneumonia admitted to Northwest Texas Hospital in Amarillo, TX, USA, during 2008. Antibiotic de-escalation was defined as changing the empiric antibiotic regimen to a culture-directed single agent with a narrower spectrum than the original regimen. Results Sixty-eight patients were admitted with bacteremic pneumonia. Eight patients were not eligible for de-escalation. Among the 60 patients who were eligible for de-escalation, the treating physicians failed to de-escalate antibiotics in 27 cases (45.0%). Discharge to a long-term care facility predicted failure to de-escalate antibiotics, while an infectious diseases consultation was significantly associated with antibiotic de-escalation. The average daily cost of antibacterial therapy in the de-escalation group was $25.7 compared with $61.6 in the group where de-escalation was not implemented. The difference in mean length of hospital stay and mortality between the two groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion Antibiotic de-escalation is a safe management strategy but unfortunately is not widely adopted. Although bacterial resistance poses a significant threat and is rising, antimicrobial de-escalation has emerged as a potential intervention that can conserve the effectiveness of broad-spectrum antibiotics without compromising the patient’s outcome. This practice is becoming important in the face of slow development of new anti-infective agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal A Khasawneh
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
| | - Adnanul Karim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
| | - Tashfeen Mahmood
- Department of Internal Medicine, Deaconess Hospital, Evansville, IN, USA
| | - Subhan Ahmed
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Sayyed F Jaffri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Deaconess Hospital, Evansville, IN, USA
| | - Mansoor Mehmood
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Khasawneh FA, Karim A, Mahmood T, Ahmed S, Jaffri SF, Tate ME, Mehmood M. Antibiotic de-escalation in bacteremic urinary tract infections: potential opportunities and effect on outcome. Infection 2014; 42:829-34. [DOI: 10.1007/s15010-014-0639-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
28
|
Razazi K, Brun-Buisson C. Désescalade de l’antibiothérapie en réanimation. MEDECINE INTENSIVE REANIMATION 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s13546-014-0865-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
29
|
Cremers AJH, Sprong T, Schouten JA, Walraven G, Hermans PWM, Meis JF, Ferwerda G. Effect of antibiotic streamlining on patient outcome in pneumococcal bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 69:2258-64. [PMID: 24729585 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In blood culture-proven pneumococcal infections, streamlining empirical therapy to monotherapy with a penicillin is preferred in order to reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, adherence to this international recommendation is poor, and curiously it is unclear whether antibiotic streamlining may be harmful to individual patients. We investigated whether streamlining in bacteraemic pneumococcal infections is associated with mortality. METHODS Adults admitted to two Dutch hospitals between 2001 and 2011 with bacteraemic pneumococcal infections were retrospectively included. Detailed clinical data on patient characteristics, comorbidities and severity and outcome of disease were obtained in addition to data on antibiotic treatment. Those eligible for streamlining were selected for further analyses. RESULTS In the 45.8% of cases (126 of 275) where antibiotic treatment was streamlined, a lower mortality rate was observed (6.3% versus 15.4%, P = 0.021). The decision to streamline was only marginally explained by the 38 determinants accounted for. After correction for potential confounders, the OR for death while streamlining was 0.45 (95% CI: 0.18-1.11, P = 0.082) in all cases and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.12-0.99, P = 0.048) specifically in pneumonia cases. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that streamlining in eligible pneumococcal bacteraemia cases is safe, irrespective of patient characteristics, severity of disease or empirical treatment regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelieke J H Cremers
- Department of Paediatrics, Radboud university medical center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation & Immunity (N4i), Radboud university medical center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Sprong
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500 GS Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen A Schouten
- Department of Intensive Care, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500 GS Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Grietje Walraven
- Department of Paediatrics, Radboud university medical center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation & Immunity (N4i), Radboud university medical center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter W M Hermans
- Department of Paediatrics, Radboud university medical center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation & Immunity (N4i), Radboud university medical center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences (NCMLS), Radboud university medical center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques F Meis
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500 GS Nijmegen, The Netherlands Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud university medical center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerben Ferwerda
- Department of Paediatrics, Radboud university medical center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation & Immunity (N4i), Radboud university medical center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Takeda K, Tanaka K, Kumamoto T, Nojiri K, Mori R, Taniguchi K, Matsuyama R, Kato H, Endo I. Septic pulmonary embolism originated from subcutaneous abscess after living donor liver transplantation: a pitfall of postoperative management. Clin J Gastroenterol 2013; 6:378-82. [PMID: 24273612 PMCID: PMC3825539 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-013-0400-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2013] [Accepted: 06/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of immunosuppressants after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with postoperative complications, including infections. A 49-year-old male underwent living-donor (LD) LT because of primary sclerosing cholangitis. He was treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids as immunosuppressants, discharged on postoperative day (POD) 40, and re-admitted because of severe acute cellular rejection on POD 48. Three courses of steroid pulse therapy were performed, and continuous peripheral intravenous drip infusion therapy via the left forearm was necessary for 20 days because of appetite loss. The patient was discharged on POD 83, but re-admitted on POD 87 with pyrexia. A subcutaneous abscess was present at a puncture wound on the left forearm formed by an intravenous drip during the last hospital stay. Furthermore, computed tomography showed five pieces of cavitary or wedge-shaped nodules in the bilateral lung. Because sputum revealed the presence of Gram-positive coccus, and subcutaneous abscess and blood cultures revealed Staphylococcus aureus, the pathogenesis was septic pulmonary embolism (SPE) secondary to S. aureus septicemia originating from a subcutaneous abscess formed by an intravenous drip. The patient was treated with drainage of the subcutaneous abscess and antibiotic therapy, and recovered immediately. Although there have been few reports of SPE after LDLT, SPE is fatal in up to 13.3 % of patients. Early diagnosis, drainage of the infectious source, and appropriate use of antimicrobial therapy should be necessary to overcome SPE. Furthermore, the identical intravenous catheters should be removed whenever possible to avoid infectious complications including SPE for patients who receive steroid pulse therapy after LDLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhisa Takeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004 Japan
| | - Kuniya Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004 Japan
| | - Takafumi Kumamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004 Japan
| | - Kazunori Nojiri
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004 Japan
| | - Ryutaro Mori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004 Japan
| | - Koichi Taniguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004 Japan
| | - Ryusei Matsuyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004 Japan
| | - Hideaki Kato
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
"De-escalation therapy" is a term that suggests the need to reduce the spectrum or the number of antibiotics formerly prescribed for critical patients, upon clinical improvement and/or microorganism recovery. The major goal of this concept is the use of broad-spectrum antibiotic agents as initial drugs of choice for severe patients, instead of "reserving" the most potent agents after an inadequate clinical response, or after the microorganism is recovered. Despite possible commercial concerns and an unproven but possible relationship with enhancing global antibiotic use, the concept was correct and in accordance with scientific evidence. However, the "de-escalation" component of the concept is very seldom reported, and no large clinical trial on this issue is available until today. To definitely put in practice this concept, comparative large trials must be designed and sponsored to insert this strategy at the same level of evidence of wide initial empiric antibiotic treatments.
Collapse
|
32
|
De-escalation of empirical therapy is associated with lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2013; 40:32-40. [PMID: 24026297 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-3077-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 258] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 08/10/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSES We set out to assess the safety and the impact on in-hospital and 90-day mortality of antibiotic de-escalation in patients admitted to the ICU with severe sepsis or septic shock. METHODS We carried out a prospective observational study enrolling patients admitted to the ICU with severe sepsis or septic shock. De-escalation was defined as discontinuation of an antimicrobial agent or change of antibiotic to one with a narrower spectrum once culture results were available. To control for confounding variables, we performed a conventional regression analysis and a propensity score (PS) adjusted-multivariable analysis. RESULTS A total of 712 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock at ICU admission were treated empirically with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Of these, 628 were evaluated (84 died before cultures were available). De-escalation was applied in 219 patients (34.9%). By multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality were septic shock, SOFA score the day of culture results, and inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy, whereas de-escalation therapy was a protective factor [Odds-Ratio (OR) 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.93). Analysis of the 403 patients with adequate empirical therapy revealed that the factor associated with mortality was SOFA score on the day of culture results, whereas de-escalation therapy was a protective factor (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.33-0.89). The PS-adjusted logistic regression models confirmed that de-escalation therapy was a protective factor in both analyses. De-escalation therapy was also a protective factor for 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS De-escalation therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock is a safe strategy associated with a lower mortality. Efforts to increase the frequency of this strategy are fully justified.
Collapse
|
33
|
Infection control team activity and recent antibiograms in the Kobe University Hospital. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2013; 66:511-6. [PMID: 23632920 DOI: 10.1038/ja.2013.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2012] [Revised: 02/25/2013] [Accepted: 03/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The hospital infection control team (ICT) has a major role in suppressing or preventing infectious diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the work of the ICT had affected the antibiograms at the Kobe University Hospital in the past 3 years. The ICT's works are as follows: (1) to monitor whether physicians are instructed in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics; (2) to check whether measures for preventing the occurrence or spread of infectious disease are performed along with appropriate standard precautions; (3) to provide rapid communication with physicians in bacteremia cases and (4) reporting the antibiograms in the hospital. In addition, we investigated changes in the antibiograms every 6 months based on all materials. There were 193 physician interventions in 2010 and 491 in 2011. The representative isolated bacteria included no additional bacteria with lower susceptibilities found over the past 1.5 years compared with the initial 1.5 years in the 3-year investigation period. The ratio for performing two sets of blood culture tests in all blood culture tests showed an upward tendency from 58.1% in 2009 to 71.1% in 2010 and 80.3% in 2011 (r=0.995, P=0.063, b=0.089). In conclusion, since the introduction of an expanded ICT role, our data showed an increased antibiotic susceptibilities in bacteria such as Enteroccus faecalis and the total amount of hand disinfectant agents tended to increase year by year, even though direct statistical analyses could not easily be performed. Further observation may be necessary for a definitive evaluation of ICT activities.
Collapse
|
34
|
Silva BNG, Andriolo RB, Atallah AN, Salomão R. De-escalation of antimicrobial treatment for adults with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD007934. [PMID: 23543557 PMCID: PMC6517189 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007934.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortality rates among patients with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock are highly variable throughout different regions or services and can be upwards of 50%. Empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment is aimed at achieving adequate antimicrobial therapy, thus reducing mortality; however, there is a risk that empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment can expose patients to overuse of antimicrobials. De-escalation has been proposed as a strategy to replace empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment by using a narrower antimicrobial therapy. This is done by reviewing the patient's microbial culture results and then making changes to the pharmacological agent or discontinuing a pharmacological combination. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of de-escalation antimicrobial treatment for adult patients diagnosed with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock caused by any micro-organism. SEARCH METHODS In this updated version, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 10); MEDLINE via PubMed (from inception to October 2012); EMBASE (from inception to October 2012); LILACS (from inception to October 2012); Current Controlled Trials; bibliographic references of relevant studies; and specialists in the area. We applied no language restriction. We had previously searched the databases to August 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA We planned to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing de-escalation (based on culture results) versus standard therapy for adults with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. The primary outcome was mortality (at 28 days, hospital discharge or at the end of the follow-up period). Studies including patients initially treated with an empirical but not adequate antimicrobial therapy were not considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors planned to independently select and extract data and to evaluate methodological quality of all studies. We planned to use relative risk (risk ratio) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals. We planned to use the random-effects statistical model when the estimate effects of two or more studies could be combined in a meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS Our search strategy retrieved 493 studies. No published RCTs testing de-escalation of antimicrobial treatment for adult patients diagnosed with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic were included in this review. We found one ongoing RCT. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is no adequate, direct evidence as to whether de-escalation of antimicrobial agents is effective and safe for adults with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. This uncertainty warrants further research via RCTs and the authors are awaiting the results of an ongoing RCT testing the de-escalation of empirical antimicrobial therapy for severe sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda N G Silva
- Brazilian Cochrane Centre, Centro de Estudos de Medicina Baseada em Evidências e Avaliação Tecnológica de Saúde, São Paulo,Brazil.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Shime N, Kosaka T, Fujita N. De-escalation of antimicrobial therapy for bacteraemia due to difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacilli. Infection 2012; 41:203-10. [PMID: 23254646 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-012-0388-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2012] [Accepted: 12/07/2012] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N Shime
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Real-time polymerase chain reaction to evaluate antibiotic appropriateness: should we spread the news to multiply it? Crit Care Med 2012; 40:2492-3. [PMID: 22809917 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318258e7f3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
37
|
Antibiotic strategies in severe nosocomial sepsis: why do we not de-escalate more often? Crit Care Med 2012; 40:1404-9. [PMID: 22430235 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3182416ecf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the use of antibiotic de-escalation in patients with hospital-acquired severe sepsis in an academic setting. DESIGN We reviewed all episodes of severe sepsis treated over a 1-yr period in the department of intensive care. Antimicrobial therapy was considered as appropriate when the antimicrobial had in vitro activity against the causative microorganisms. According to the therapeutic strategy in the 5 days after the start of antimicrobial therapy, we classified patients into four groups: de-escalation (interruption of an antimicrobial agent or change of antibiotic to one with a narrower spectrum); no change in antibiotherapy; escalation (addition of a new antimicrobial agent or change in antibiotic to one with a broader spectrum); and mixed changes. SETTING A 35-bed medico-surgical intensive care department in which antibiotic strategies are reviewed by infectious disease specialists three times per week. PATIENTS One hundred sixty-nine patients with 216 episodes of severe sepsis attributable to a hospital-acquired infection who required broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics alone or in association with other anti-infectious agents. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The major sources of infection were the lungs (44%) and abdomen (38%). Microbiological data were available in 167 of the 216 episodes (77%). Initial antimicrobial therapy was inappropriate in 27 episodes (16% of culture-positive episodes). De-escalation was applied in 93 episodes (43%), escalation was applied in 22 episodes (10%), mixed changes were applied in 24 (11%) episodes, and there was no change in empirical antibiotic therapy in 77 (36%) episodes. In these 77 episodes, the reasons given for maintaining the initial antimicrobial therapy included the sensitivity pattern of the causative organisms and previous antibiotic therapy. The number of episodes when the chance to de-escalate may have been missed was small (4 episodes [5%]). CONCLUSION Even in a highly focused environment with close collaboration among intensivists and infectious disease specialists, de-escalation may actually be possible in <50% of cases.
Collapse
|
38
|
Antimicrobial de-escalation in cancer patients. Infection 2011; 40:223-4; author reply 229-30. [PMID: 22090318 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-011-0221-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2011] [Accepted: 11/03/2011] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
39
|
Shime N. De-escalation strategies could be applied to a wide variety of infectious settings. Infection 2011. [DOI: 10.1007/s15010-011-0222-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
40
|
Flint R. Recent Publications on Medications and Pharmacy. Hosp Pharm 2011. [DOI: 10.1310/hpj4611-905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Hospital Pharmacy presents this feature to keep pharmacists abreast of new publications in the medical/pharmacy literature. Articles of interest regarding a broad scope of topics are abstracted monthly. Suggestions or comments may be addressed to Flint Russett, St. Claire Regional Medical Center, 222 Medical Circle, Morehead, KY 40351, or e-mail: FSRussett@st-claire.org .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russett Flint
- Department of Pharmacy and Drug Information, St. Claire Regional Medical Center, Morehead, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|