Infections causing stroke or stroke-like syndromes

Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: Systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease contributes substantially to global mortality and morbidity. Respiratory tract infections, particularly influenza, may trigger an increase in the short-term risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke. Recent studies have also linked this risk to other respiratory viruses, including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, the pathogen-specific relative contributions, the strength of their associations, and overall public health significance are poorly understood. Assuming causal links, understanding, quantifying, and comparing the effects of different pathogens as triggering factors for acute cardiovascular events is critical to guide future research and prevention. Our aim is to conduct a systematic review to examine the relative effects of laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infections as triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke.

METHODS

We will conduct a comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science, from inception to the end of March 2024. Studies capturing respiratory viral infection(s) using laboratory-confirmatory methods, incidence of AMI or stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), and those involving human participants in any country, will be assessed for eligibility. We will include the following analytical epidemiological study types: randomised controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies, self-controlled case series, and case-crossover designs. We will not impose restrictions on the date, language, study population, geographical region, or sample size, to minimise the risk of introducing biases. Search results will be screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers, and discrepancies resolved by consensus and/or arbitration by a third reviewer. We will assess the risk of bias among the included studies by adopting the Cochrane Collaboration tools for randomised and non-randomised studies. The overall quality of studies will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. We will examine sources of heterogeneity, and if studies are sufficiently homogeneous, a meta-analysis will be conducted to calculate the pooled effect sizes. Reporting will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42024494997.

Infectious and Postinfectious Vasculopathies

Stroke is a complication of many central nervous system (CNS) infections, but only a few present with stroke without other symptoms or signs of CNS infection. Chief among these are varicella zoster virus (VZV) and syphilis. Delayed cerebral vasculopathy after successful treatment of bacterial meningitis, most commonly pneumococcal, is an emerging entity with uncertain pathogenesis.

Brain abscesses in infective endocarditis: contemporary profile and neuroradiological findings

BACKGROUND

Brain abscesses (BA) are severe lesions in the course of infective endocarditis (IE). We compare the bacteriological, clinical data, background, associated lesions, and outcome of IE patients with and without BAs, and assess the MRI characteristics of BAs.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 351 consecutive patients with definite IE (2005-2020) and at least one brain MRI. Patients with and without BAs were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (5.7%) had BA (80% men; median age: 44.9 ± 11.5). They were younger (p = 0.035) and had a higher rate of predisposing factors (previous IE 20% vs 2.2%, p = 0.03), intravenous drug use [25% vs 2.2%; p < 0.0001]), underlying conditions (HIV infection, 20% vs 2.2%, p < 0.0001; alcohol abuse, 20% vs 2.2% p < 0.0001]; liver disease p = 0.04; hemodialysis, p = 0.001; type 2 diabetes, p = 0.001), bacterial meningitis (p = 0.0029), rare species involvement (35% vs 7%, p < 0.0006) and extra-cerebral abscesses (p = 0.0001) compared to patients without BA. Valve vegetations were larger in Group 1 (p = 0.046). Clinical presentation could suggest the diagnosis of BA in only 7/20 (35%) patients. MR identified 58 BAs (mean/patient 2.9; range 2-12): often multiple (80%), bilateral (55%) and ≤ 10 mm (72%). The presence of BA did not modify cardiac surgery indication and timing. Favorable outcome was observed in 85% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Rates of predisposing, underlying conditions, rare IE agents, meningitis and metastatic abscesses are significantly higher in BA-IE patients. As BAs can develop in asymptomatic IE patients, the impact of brain MRI on their management needs thoroughly to be further investigated.

The preclinical discovery and development of molnupiravir for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)

INTRODUCTION

Molnupiravir (MOV) is a broad-spectrum oral antiviral agent approved for the treatment of COVID-19. The results from in vitro and in vivo studies suggested MOV activity against many RNA viruses such as influenza virus and some alphaviruses agents of epidemic encephalitis. MOV is a prodrug metabolized into the ribonucleoside analog β-D-N⁴-hydroxycytidine. It is incorporated into the viral RNA chain causing mutations impairing coding activity of the virus, thereby inhibiting viral replication.

AREAS COVERED

This review analyzes the in vitro and in vivo studies that have highlighted the efficacy of MOV and the main pre-authorization randomized controlled trials evaluating its safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics, as well as its antiviral efficacy against SARS-COV-2 infection.

EXPERT OPINION

MOV is an antiviral agent with an excellent tolerability profile with few drug-drug interactions. Treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 can benefit from MOV administration in the precocious phases of the disease, prior to the trigger of an aberrant immune response responsible for the parenchymal damage to pulmonary and extrapulmonary tissues. However, its suspected mutagenic effect can be a factor limiting its use at least in selected populations and studies on its teratogen effects should be planned before it is authorized for use in the pediatric population or in pregnant women.

Effect of remdesivir on mortality rate and clinical status of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Remdesivir (RDV) is a broad-spectrum antiviral drug, now approved by Regulatory Agencies for COVID-19 treatment. RDV is associated with improvements in clinical outcomes, but no conclusive studies have shown an effect in reducing mortality. This study aimed to carry out a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate whether RDV can significantly modify the outcome of COVID-19 patients evaluating its effects on mortality, length of stay, time to clinical improvement and need for oxygen supplementation. No significant improvement in terms of survival in patients treated with standard therapy (ST)+RDV as compared to ST alone (P = 0.24) was found. The duration of oxygen support was significantly lower in patients treated with ST + RDV compared with ST alone (P = 0.03). Further investigations should be planned to assess the real impact of RDV in the management of COVID-19 patients.

Infectious Causes of Stroke

Stroke is one of the primary causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. It can be ischemic or hemorrhagic, and the former can be due to an in-situ thrombus or a distant embolus. Despite being a rare cause, stroke can also be caused in the setting of infection. Bacterial agents are the most common cause of stroke, among other infectious agents. Until the antibiotic era, rheumatic heart disease was a predisposing risk factor of infective endocarditis. VZV is the most common cause of strokes in pediatric and adult populations. Cryptococcus and Candida spp are the most common yeasts involved in CNS infections, especially in immunocompromised patients. In COVID-19 patients, ischemic strokes are more common than hemorrhagic strokes. In this review, we will discuss the most common infectious agents, with particular emphasis on COVID-19.

An overview of the preclinical discovery and development of remdesivir for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

INTRODUCTION

Remdesivir (RDV) is an inhibitor of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases that are active in some RNA viruses, including the Ebola virus and zoonotic coronaviruses. When severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as the etiologic agent of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), several investigations have assessed the potential activity of RDV in inhibiting viral replication, giving rise to hope for an effective treatment.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors describe the main investigations leading to the discovery of RDV and its subsequent development as an antiviral agent, focusing on the main clinical trials investigating its efficacy in terms of symptom resolution and mortality reduction.

EXPERT OPINION

RDV is the most widely investigated antiviral drug for the treatment of COVID-19. This attention on RDV activity against SARS-CoV-2 is justified by promising in vitro studies, which demonstrated that RDV was able to suppress viral replication without significant toxicity. Such activity was confirmed by an investigation in an animal model and by the results of preliminary clinical investigations. Nevertheless, the efficacy of RDV in reducing mortality has not been clearly demonstrated.

Central and Peripheral Nervous System Complications of Vasculitis Syndromes From Pathology to Bedside: Part 1-Central Nervous System

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive update on the clinical assessment, diagnosis, complications, and treatment of primary central nervous system vasculitis (PCNSV).

RECENT FINDINGS

The developments in neuroimaging, molecular testing, and cerebral biopsy have enhanced clinical assessment and decision making, providing novel insights to prevent misdiagnosis increasing diagnostic certainty. Advances in imaging techniques visualizing the wall of intracranial vessels have improved the possibility to distinguish inflammatory from non-inflammatory vascular lesions. Large recent studies have revealed a more varied histopathological pictures and disclosed an association with amyloid angiopathy. Unfortunately, therapy remains largely empiric. PCNSV is a heterogeneous group of disorders encompassing different clinical subsets that may differ in terms of prognosis and therapy. Recent evidence has described a more benign course, with good response to therapy. New diagnostic techniques will play soon a pivotal role in the appropriate diagnosis and prompt management of PCNSV.

Characteristics of viral pneumonia in the COVID-19 era: an update

Influenza virus, rhinovirus, and adenovirus frequently cause viral pneumonia, an important cause of morbidity and mortality especially in the extreme ages of life. During the last two decades, three outbreaks of coronavirus-associated pneumonia, namely Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Middle-East Respiratory Syndrome, and the ongoing Coronavirus Infectious Disease—2019 (COVID-19) were reported. The rate of diagnosis of viral pneumonia is increasingly approaching 60% among children identified as having community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Clinical presentation ranges from mild to severe pneumonitis complicated by respiratory failure in severe cases. The most vulnerable patients, the elderly and those living with cancer, report a relevant mortality rate. No clinical characteristics can be useful to conclusively distinguish the different etiology of viral pneumonia. However, accessory symptoms, such as anosmia or ageusia together with respiratory symptoms suggest COVID-19. An etiologic-based treatment of viral pneumonia is possible in a small percentage of cases only. Neuraminidase inhibitors have been proven to reduce the need for ventilatory support and mortality rate while only a few data support the large-scale use of other antivirals. A low-middle dose of dexamethasone and heparin seems to be effective in COVID-19 patients, but data regarding their possible efficacy in viral pneumonia caused by other viruses are conflicting. In conclusion, viral pneumonia is a relevant cause of CAP, whose interest is increasing due to the current COVID-19 outbreak. To set up a therapeutic approach is difficult because of the low number of active molecules and the conflicting data bearing supportive treatments such as steroids.

Experimental Pharmacotherapy for COVID-19: The Latest Advances

The coronavirus infectious disease-2019 (COVID-19) has overwhelmed like a shock wave in a completely unprepared world. Despite coronavirus infections were involved in previous epidemic outbreaks, no antiviral agent was developed for specific treatment. As a consequence, since the beginning of this pandemic, both repositioned and experimental drugs were used to treat the infected patients without evidence of clinical efficacy. Just based on experience coming from the use of antiviral agents to treat other viruses (eg, lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesivir) and supposed antiviral or immunomodulatory activities of drugs with no approved antiviral indications (eg hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab), clinicians have faced the ongoing pandemic. Currently, after about 9 months from the COVID-19 spread, there is still no antiviral agent capable of ensuring the cure of this syndrome. Clinical trials are beginning to confirm the benefits of some drugs, while for other compounds, efficacy and safety have not yet been confirmed. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) have denied or downsized the beneficial effects attributed to certain molecules, such as aminoquinolines, largely used in clinical practice at the beginning of COVID-19 spread. Conversely, at the same time, they have provided evidence for unexpected effectiveness of other agents that have been underutilized, such as steroids, which were not used in SARS treatment because of the threatened effect on viral replication. Evidence deriving from pathologic studies have demonstrated that the prothrombotic effects of SARS-CoV-2 can be prevented by heparin prophylaxis, underlining the need for personalized treatment for patients with severe disease. The main aim of this review is to synthesize the available information and evidence on both repositioned and experimental drugs for the treatment of COVID-19, focusing on the need to exercise caution on the use of unproven medical therapies.

The clinical characteristics and prognosis of COVID-19 patients with cerebral stroke: A retrospective study of 113 cases from one single-centre

To explore the clinical characteristics and prognosis of COVID‐19 patients with cerebral stroke. A total of 2,474 COVID‐19 patients from February 10th to March 24th, 2020 were admitted and treated in two branches (Optic Valley and Sino‐French New City branch) of the Tongji Hospital. Data on the clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters and prognosis of COVID‐19 patients with or without cerebral stroke were collected and comparatively analysed. Of the 2,474 COVID‐19 patients, 113 (4.7%) patients had cerebral stroke and 25 (1.0%) patients had new‐onset stroke. Eighty‐eight (77.9%) patients in the previous‐stroke group had cerebral ischaemia, while 25 (22.1%) patients in the new‐onset stroke group had cerebral ischaemia. Most COVID‐19 patients with stroke were elderly with more comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes and heart diseases than patients without stroke. Laboratory examinations showed hypercoagulation and elevated serum parameters such as IL‐6, cTnI, NT pro‐BNP and BUN. Consciousness disorders, a long disease course and poor prognosis were also more commonly observed in stroke patients. The mortality rate of stroke patients was almost double (12.4% vs. 6.9%) that of patients without stroke. In addition, age, male sex and hypertension were independent predictors for new cerebral stroke in COVID‐19 patients. In conclusion, the high risk of new‐onset stroke must be taken into consideration when treating COVID‐19 patients with an elderly age combined with a history of hypertension. These patients are more vulnerable to multiorgan dysfunction and an overactivated inflammatory response, in turn leading to an unfavourable outcome and higher mortality rate.

Decrease in Stroke Diagnoses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Where Did All Our Stroke Patients Go?

Despite the evidence suggesting a high rate of cerebrovascular complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2, reports have indicated decreasing rates of new ischemic stroke diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic. The observed decrease in emergency department (ED) visits is unsurprising during this major crisis, as patients are likely to prioritize avoiding exposure to SARS-CoV-2 over addressing what they may perceive as mild symptoms of headache, lethargy, difficulty speaking, and numbness. In the central and south Texas regions where we practice, we suspect that patient admission, treatment, and discharge volumes for acute stroke treatment have decreased significantly since COVID-19–related shelter-at-home orders were issued. Symptoms of stroke are frequently noticed by a family member, friend, or community member before they are recognized by the patients themselves, and these symptoms may be going unnoticed due to limited face-to-face encounters. This possibility emphasizes the importance of patient education regarding stroke warning signs and symptoms during the current period of isolation and social-distancing. The south Texas population, already saddled with above-average rates of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, has a higher stroke mortality rate compared to Texas and U.S. averages; however, the number of patients presenting to EDs with acute ischemic stroke diagnoses is lower than average. In our viewpoint, we aim to present the relative literature to date and outline our ongoing analyses of the highly affected and diverse stroke populations in San Antonio and Austin, Texas, to answer a simple question: where did all our stroke patients go?

The Predicting Role of Neutrophil- Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Acute Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is considered as an independent and easy-to-measure inflammatory predictor of mortality in patients with acute stroke. However, it is unclear whether the NLR is related to other problems caused by stroke. This study evaluated the possible roles of the NLR in estimating mortality rate and health problems in patients with acute ischemic (IS) and hemorrhagic (H) stroke.

METHODS

A total of 180 patients with acute IS and H stroke were enrolled. NLR was calculated from the admission blood work. Patients were divided into two groups according to the NLR values (<5 and >5). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings were collected for the subjects. The correlations of NLR with mortality, infection incidences, and other parameters were determined using statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The percentages of lymphocytes and WBCs were significantly higher in IS stroke patients than H group, unlike neutrophil number (P < 0. 0001-0.01). In contrast with the serum levels of hemoglobin, Na, Chol, HTN, LDL, ESR, MCV, and CRP, triglyceride was significantly decreased in H group (P < 0.0001). IS group had a significant reduction in NLR (P < 0.0001). Patients with NLR of < 5 had a significant reduction in infectious diseases, unlike H group (P < 0.01). The NLR had no associations with bedscore, GIB, DVT, mortality rate. However, it was positively correlated to the numbers of WBC and RBC, and values of CRP, ESR, and hypertension (P < 0.001-0.05), unlike MCV in H group (P < 0.05). The NLR was not associated hemoglobin, triglyceride, Chol, and LDL levels.

CONCLUSION

Unlike previous studies, this study suggests that the NLR, along with other clinical and laboratory parameters, may be used to determine stroke type and predict patient susceptibility to some infectious diseases such as pneumonia. However, more investigations are required to clarify the role of the NLR in different aspects of acute stroke.

Low stroke incidence in the TEMPiS telestroke network during COVID-19 pandemic - effect of lockdown on thrombolysis and thrombectomy

Background

During the COVID-19 pandemic emergency departments have noted a significant decrease in stroke patients. We performed a timely analysis of the Bavarian telestroke TEMPiS “working diagnosis” database.

Methods

Twelve hospitals from the TEMPiS network were selected. Data collected for January through April in years 2017 through 2020 were extracted and analyzed for presumed and definite ischemic stroke (IS), amongst other disorders. In addition, recommendations for intravenous thrombolysis (rtPA) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) were noted and mobility data of the region analyzed. If statistically valid, group-comparison was tested with Fisher’s exact test considering unpaired observations and ap-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Upon lockdown in mid-March 2020, we observed a significant reduction in recommendations for rtPA compared to the preceding three years (14.7% [2017–2019] vs. 9.2% [2020], p = 0.0232). Recommendations for EVT were significantly higher in January to mid-March 2020 compared to 2017–2019 (5.4% [2017–2019] vs. 9.3% [2020], p = 0.0013) reflecting its increasing importance. Following the COVID-19 lockdown mid-March 2020 the number of EVT decreased back to levels in 2017–2019 (7.4% [2017–2019] vs. 7.6% [2020], p = 0.1719). Absolute numbers of IS decreased in parallel to mobility data.

Conclusions

The reduced stroke incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic may in part be explained by patient avoidance to seek emergency stroke care and may have an association to population mobility. Increasing mobility may induce a rebound effect and may conflict with a potential second COVID-19 wave. Telemedical networks may be ideal databases to study such effects in near-real time.