1
|
van Oorschot F, Brouwers M, Muris J, Veen M, Timmerman A, Dulmen SV. How does guided group reflection work to support professional identity formation in postgraduate medical education: A scoping review. MEDICAL TEACHER 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38626746 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2024.2339409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In postgraduate medical education, guided group reflection is often applied to support professional identity formation. However, little is known about how guided group reflection is shaped and how it works. Our scoping review synthesizes existing evidence about various approaches for guided group reflection, their aims, components and potential working mechanisms. METHODS We conducted a scoping review using JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) guidelines for conducting scoping reviews. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE and ERIC databases for all research articles published in English or Dutch in an iterative team approach. The articles were extracted and summarized quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS We included 71 papers (45 primary research papers and 26 non-empirical papers including program descriptions, theoretical concepts and personal experiences). We identified a diversity of approaches for guided group reflection (e.g. Balint groups, supervised collaborative reflection and exchange of experiences), applied in a variety of didactic formats and aims. We distilled potential working mechanisms relating to engagement in reflection, group learning and the supervisor's role. CONCLUSIONS There are significant knowledge gaps about the aims and underlying mechanisms of guided group reflection. Future systematic research on these topics is needed to understand the effectiveness of educational methods, that can help facilitate learning conditions to best shape professional identity formation (PIF) in educational curricula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederieke van Oorschot
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne Brouwers
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jean Muris
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mario Veen
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angelique Timmerman
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phua GLG, Owyong JLJ, Leong ITY, Goh S, Somasundaram N, Poon EYL, Chowdhury AR, Ong SYK, Lim C, Murugam V, Ong EK, Mason S, Hill R, Krishna LKR. A systematic scoping review of group reflection in medical education. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:398. [PMID: 38600515 PMCID: PMC11007913 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05203-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reviewing experiences and recognizing the impact of personal and professional views and emotions upon conduct shapes a physician's professional and personal development, molding their professional identity formation (PIF). Poor appreciation on the role of reflection, shortages in trained tutors and inadequate 'protected time' for reflections in packed medical curricula has hindered its integration into medical education. Group reflection could be a viable alternative to individual reflections; however, this nascent practice requires further study. METHODS A Systematic Evidence Based Approach guided Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) was adopted to guide and structure a review of group reflections in medical education. Independent searches of articles published between 1st January 2000 and 30th June 2022 in bibliographic and grey literature databases were carried out. Included articles were analysed separately using thematic and content analysis, and combined into categories and themes. The themes/categories created were compared with the tabulated summaries of included articles to create domains that framed the synthesis of the discussion. RESULTS 1141 abstracts were reviewed, 193 full-text articles were appraised and 66 articles were included and the domains identified were theories; indications; types; structure; and benefits and challenges of group reflections. CONCLUSIONS Scaffolded by current approaches to individual reflections and theories and inculcated with nuanced adaptations from other medical practices, this SSR in SEBA suggests that structured group reflections may fill current gaps in training. However, design and assessment of the evidence-based structuring of group reflections proposed here must be the focus of future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Jasmine Lerk Juan Owyong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- School of Humanities and Behavioural Sciences, Singapore University of Social Sciences, 463 Clementi Road, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ian Tze Yong Leong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Suzanne Goh
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- KK Women's and Children Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Rd, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Nagavalli Somasundaram
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eileen Yi Ling Poon
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, 16 College Road, Block 3 Level 1, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Vengadasalam Murugam
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Assisi Hospice, 832 Thomson Rd, Singapore, Singapore
- Office of Medical Humanities, SingHealth Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, 31 Third Hospital Ave, Singapore, 168753, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Ruaridh Hill
- Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, Singapore, Singapore.
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilford K, Morretta M. Physical therapy student perception of self-reflection activities in a musculoskeletal course: A mixed-method study. Physiother Theory Pract 2023; 39:2391-2398. [PMID: 35739636 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2080620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deliberate reflection is an effective method to aid in professional development. Most documented self-reflection activities (SRA) occur during clinical experiences. Literature on SRA within the didactic component of entry-level physical therapy education is lacking. PURPOSE The purpose of this mixed-method study was to evaluate student perception of in-class SRA. METHODS A convenience sample of 61 students in a DPT program was recruited. Students were enrolled in a musculoskeletal course and participated in six 10-minute SRA. At the end of the course, students completed a survey to assess perception. RESULTS Fifty-nine (97%) students completed the anonymous survey. Most reported they would continue SRA in future courses (92%, 55/60) and as a professional (95%, 57/60). Thematic analysis identified SRA promote the professional qualities of self-evaluation, confidence, and clinical excellence. Quiet time, self-evaluation, and sharing with others were identified as benefits of SRA. Curricular threading of SRA in entry-level physical therapy education was strongly suggested. CONCLUSION Self-reflection activities can be implemented into the didactic portion of entry-level physical therapy education and be perceived positively by students. Future research can assess the impact of SRA on clinical reasoning development during the didactic portion of entry-level physical therapy education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Wilford
- College of Rehabilitative Sciences Physical Therapy, University of St Augustine for Health Sciences, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew Morretta
- College of Rehabilitative Sciences Physical Therapy, University of St Augustine for Health Sciences, Austin, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Walinga CW, Barnhoorn PC, Essers GTJM, Schaepkens SPC, Kramer AWM. 'You are not alone.' An exploratory study on open-topic, guided collaborative reflection sessions during the General Practice placement. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 23:769. [PMID: 37845655 PMCID: PMC10577966 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04756-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To support professional development of medical students faced with challenges of the clinical phase, collaborative reflection sessions (CRSs) are used to share and reflect on workplace experiences. Facilitation of CRSs seems essential to optimise learning and to provide important skills for lifelong learning as a professional. However, little is known about which workplace experiences students share in CRSs without advance guidance on specific topics, and how reflecting on these experiences contributes to students' professional development. Therefore, we explored which workplace experiences students shared, what they learned from reflection on these experiences, and how they perceived the value of CRSs. METHODS We conducted an exploratory study among medical students (N = 99) during their General Practice placement. Students were invited to openly share workplace experiences, without pre-imposed instruction. A thematic analysis was performed on shared experiences and student learning gains. Students' perceptions of CRSs were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS All 99 students volunteered to fill out the questionnaire. We found four themes relating to students' shared experiences: interactions with patients, complex patient care, diagnostic or therapeutic considerations, and dealing with collegial issues. Regarding students' learning gains, we found 6 themes: learning from others or learning from sharing with others, learning about learning, communication skills, self-regulation, determination of position within the healthcare team, and importance of good documentation. Students indicated that they learned from reflection on their own and peer's workplace experiences. Students valued the CRSs as a safe environment in which to share workplace experiences and helpful for their professional development. CONCLUSIONS In the challenging General Practice placement, open-topic, guided CRSs provide a helpful and valued learning environment relevant to professional development and offer opportunities for vicarious learning among peers. CRSs may also be a valuable tool to incorporate into other placements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris W Walinga
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
| | - Pieter C Barnhoorn
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sven P C Schaepkens
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke W M Kramer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schaepkens SPC, Lijster T. Mind The Gap: A Philosophical Analysis of Reflection's Many Benefits. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2022:1-10. [PMID: 36475951 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2142794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Issue: Expectations of reflection run high in medical practice and medical education; it is claimed as a means to many ends. In this article, the authors do not reject the value of reflection for medical education and medical practitioners, but they still ask why reflection can (potentially) yield so many different benefits, and what that implies for the status of reflection in medical education practice. Evidence: Based on a conceptual analysis of debates about reflection in the philosophical tradition, the authors argue that there are two quintessential gaps that play a role in the proliferation of (potential) benefits. First, reflection deals with bridging the gap between theory and practice; second, it deals with bridging the gap between the individual sense and communal sense. These gaps prevent the systematization of reflection, and they are fundamental to human thinking and experience in any situated environment, which led contemporary research on reflection to list a wide variety of benefits. Implications: The authors argue that if reflection resists systematization, it cannot be learned by following rules or protocols, but only practiced. Then, reflection should no longer be taught and researched as an individual skill one learns, nor as a means to some particular, beneficial end. Rather, one should practice reflection, and experience what it means to be part of a community wherein professionals jump the theory-practice gap constantly in a myriad of situations. Based on their analysis, the authors provide three concrete recommendations for reflection in medical education. First, to give precedence to reflective activities that encompass both gaps wherein situated examples can flourish; second, to use reflective guidelines as sources of inspiration; third, to show reserve about assessing reflection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thijs Lijster
- Faculty of Arts, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Braak M, Huiskes M, Veen M. When and how teachers intervene in group discussions on experiences from practice in postgraduate medical education: an interactional analysis. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION : THEORY AND PRACTICE 2022; 27:965-988. [PMID: 35723769 PMCID: PMC9606080 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-022-10122-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Medical educators constantly make decisions on when and how to intervene. Current literature provides general suggestions about types of teacher interventions. Our study aims to specify that knowledge by describing in detail the actions teachers do when intervening, the interactional consequences of those actions, and how these relate to teacher roles in group discussions. We collected all first teacher interventions (n = 142) in 41 videorecorded group discussions on experiences from practice at the Dutch postgraduate training for General Practice. We analyzed the interventions using Conversation Analysis. First, we described the timing, manner, actions, and interactional consequences of each intervention. Next, we inductively categorized actions into types of actions. Finally, we analyzed the distribution of these types of actions over the group discussion phases (telling, exploration, discussion, conclusion). First teacher interventions were done at observably critical moments. Actions done by these interventions could be categorized as moderating, expert, and evaluating actions. Moderating actions, commonly done during the telling and exploration phase, are least directive. Expert and evaluator actions, more common in the discussion phase, are normative and thus more directive. The placement and form of the actions done by teachers, as well as their accounts for doing those, may hint at a teacher orientation to intervene as late as possible. Since the interventions are occasioned by prior interaction and responded to in different ways by residents, they are a collaborative interactional accomplishment. Our detailed description of how, when and with what effect teachers intervene provides authentic material for teacher training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije van Braak
- Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Utrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Mike Huiskes
- Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mario Veen
- Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|