Knowledge Is Power, but Is Ignorance Bliss? Optimising Conversations About Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis

Long non-coding RNAs and microRNAs as crucial regulators in cardio-oncology

Cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Significant improvements in the modern era of anticancer therapeutic strategies have increased the survival rate of cancer patients. Unfortunately, cancer survivors have an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, which is believed to result from anticancer therapies. The emergence of cardiovascular diseases among cancer survivors has served as the basis for establishing a novel field termed cardio-oncology. Cardio-oncology primarily focuses on investigating the underlying molecular mechanisms by which anticancer treatments lead to cardiovascular dysfunction and the development of novel cardioprotective strategies to counteract cardiotoxic effects of cancer therapies. Advances in genome biology have revealed that most of the genome is transcribed into non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), which are recognized as being instrumental in cancer, cardiovascular health, and disease. Emerging studies have demonstrated that alterations of these ncRNAs have pathophysiological roles in multiple diseases in humans. As it relates to cardio-oncology, though, there is limited knowledge of the role of ncRNAs. In the present review, we summarize the up-to-date knowledge regarding the roles of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) in cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicities. Moreover, we also discuss prospective therapeutic strategies and the translational relevance of these ncRNAs.

"I'm walking into the unknown": Qualitative insights into how emotions and lived experience related to multiple sclerosis diagnosis impact on decisions to pursue disease modifying treatment

INTRODUCTION

People with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) are increasingly included as active participants in shared decision making around their treatment options. Choosing a first disease modifying treatment (DMT) is a complex process that often takes place soon after a diagnosis has been given. Patients therefore are often required to make difficult decisions at a time when they are still coming to terms with their illness. This study investigated the views and experiences of recently diagnosed patients with RRMS when they were making their initial DMT choice.

METHOD

This was a qualitative study involving in-depth semi-structured interviews with patients with RRMS in a National Health Service (NHS) setting in the United Kingdom. Data were collected from 6 patients and analysis was guided by an Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach.

RESULTS

Initial reactions to diagnosis were characterized by strong emotions and a feeling of despair and hopelessness. Subsequently the DMT decision was shaped by multiple considerations around maintaining normality, and restoring hope and control over one's life whilst reconciling uncertainty around efficacy. Considering the future with a DMT elicited reflections around employment and family planning.

CONCLUSION

Emotions and lived experience related to recent MS diagnosis can impact on the initial DMT decision in number of ways. Health care professionals need to understand the lived experience of patients making DMT decisions soon after diagnosis when engaging in shared decision making.

Disease-related knowledge measurement instruments of people affected by multiple sclerosis: protocol for a systematic psychometric review

INTRODUCTION

Disease-related knowledge is a key component of shared decision making and a relevant outcome to measure the effectiveness of information provision interventions. However, no systematic psychometric reviews have been found that assess the measurement instruments aimed at evaluating the disease-related knowledge of people affected by multiple sclerosis. This review aims to systematically assess the quality of the measurement properties of all available disease-related knowledge measurement instruments of people affected by multiple sclerosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic psychometric review will be carried out in accordance with the guidelines proposed by the international 'COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)' initiative. Studies that meet the following criteria will be selected: (1) those whose aim is to measure disease-related knowledge, (2) those whose study populations are affected by multiple sclerosis and (3) those whose aims are to develop measurement instruments or evaluate one or more of their measurement properties. The information sources will be MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, PsycINFO and OpenGrey. The methodological quality will be assessed using the 'COSMIN Risk of Bias' checklist. Available evidence will be synthesised and graded using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As this is a systematic review, no ethics approval is needed. Study findings will be shared with multiple sclerosis patient support groups and in reports to funders. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at national and international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019125417.

Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis: A Literature Review Exploring Patient Perspectives

PURPOSE

Multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis is often uncertain. This literature review considers patients' understanding of, and perspectives on, MS progression to better comprehend the unmet needs of people with MS (PwMS), in order to improve treatment adherence and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Literature searches for peer-reviewed papers concerning patient perspectives on the progression of MS and comparable conditions, published between January 2000 and January 2020, were conducted.

RESULTS

Little qualitative evidence exists that examines PwMS' perspectives on MS progression. The understanding and meaning ascribed to terms such as "disease progression" vary. Some PwMS find disease labels stigmatizing, confusing, and disconnected from reality. The lack of a clear definition of progression and discrepancies between PwMS and healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives may contribute to misunderstanding and poor communication. Patient descriptions of progression and relapses include symptoms in addition to those evaluated by standard severity and disability measures. Compared with HCPs, PwMS are still focused on relapse prevention but place higher priority on QoL and ascribe different relative importance to the causes of poor adherence to treatment plans. PwMS want to discuss progression and likely prognosis. Such communication needs to be personalized and delivered with sensitivity, at an appropriate time. Poor treatment adherence may arise from a lack of understanding and poor communication, particularly around treatment goals. The few studies that directly considered patient perspectives on the progression of comparable conditions supported and extended the perspectives of PwMS. Lack of adequate communication by HCPs was the most common theme.

CONCLUSION

Patient perspectives on disease progression in MS and other chronic progressive conditions are under-investigated and under-reported. The limited evidence available highlights the importance of providing adequate information and effective HCP communication. While further studies are needed, the current evidence base offers information and insights that may help HCPs to enhance patient care, well-being, and treatment adherence.