The Misdiagnosis of CIDP: A Review

Genetic analyses of inflammatory polyneuropathy and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy identified candidate genes

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare, immune-mediated disorder in which an aberrant immune response causes demyelination and axonal damage of the peripheral nerves. Genetic contribution to CIDP is unclear and no genome-wide association study (GWAS) has been reported so far. In this study, we aimed to identify CIDP-related risk loci, genes, and pathways. We first focused on CIDP, and 516 CIDP cases and 403,545 controls were included in the GWAS analysis. We also investigated genetic risk for inflammatory polyneuropathy (IP), in which we performed a GWAS study using FinnGen data and combined the results with GWAS from the UK Biobank using a fixed-effect meta-analysis. A total of 1,261 IP cases and 823,730 controls were included in the analysis. Stratified analyses by gender were performed. Mendelian randomization (MR), colocalization, and transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) analyses were performed to identify associated genes. Gene-set analyses were conducted to identify associated pathways. We identified one genome-wide significant locus at 20q13.33 for CIDP risk among women, the top variant located at the intron region of gene CDH4. Sex-combined MR, colocalization, and TWAS analyses identified three candidate pathogenic genes for CIDP and five genes for IP. MAGMA gene-set analyses identified a total of 18 pathways related to IP or CIDP. Sex-stratified analyses identified three genes for IP among males and two genes for IP among females. Our study identified suggestive risk genes and pathways for CIDP and IP. Functional analyses should be conducted to further confirm these associations.

Prevalence, Clinical Profiles, and Prognosis of CIDP in Japanese Nationwide Survey: Analyses of 1,257 Diagnosis-Confirmed Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the current epidemiology, clinical profile, and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) using a nationwide survey in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide survey using an epidemiologic method established in 2021. Questionnaire sheets were sent to the hospital departments of neurology and pediatric neurology throughout Japan. A primary questionnaire was used to determine the number of patients and their prevalence, and a second questionnaire was used to collect detailed clinical information.

RESULTS

The primary survey showed that the estimated number of patients with CIDP was 4,180, with a prevalence of 3.3 per 100,000 persons. In the secondary survey, detailed clinical data were available for 1,257 patients. The male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1, and the median age at onset was 52 years. Typical CIDP was the most frequent subtype (52%), followed by distal (17%) and multifocal/focal CIDP (17%). Initial treatments included immunoglobulin therapy (72%), corticosteroids (15%), and others (13%). Among patients with CIDP, 78% had a progressive/relapsing course, 14% did not respond to first-line treatments, and 18% could not walk independently at the last visit. Among the subtypes, typical CIDP had the most severe disability before treatment (44% of patients could not walk independently). However, they showed a more favorable response to treatment than those with distal or multifocal CIDP. In the subgroup analyses, logistic regression analyses showed that younger age at onset, no muscle atrophy, and abnormal median-normal sural sensory nerve responses were associated with a higher probability of independent walking.

DISCUSSION

Our study represents the largest cohort study on CIDP to demonstrate the current epidemiologic and clinical status of CIDP in Japan. Clinical subtypes seem to be associated with different treatment responses and outcomes; therefore, an appropriate treatment strategy according to the pathophysiology of each subtype is required to improve the prognosis of CIDP.

Symptom and Treatment Satisfaction in Members of the US and Canadian GBS/CIDP Foundations with a Diagnosis of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines for defining good outcomes in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) are predominately defined by experts. At present, we do not have a patient-anchored definition of what constitutes a "good" outcome. Our study aimed to assess the symptom burden of people living with CIDP, as well as satisfaction with treatments and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted an online-survey in CIDP patients registered with the US and Canadian GBS/CIDP foundations. Respondents answered general demographic and clinical questions, as well as satisfaction with current symptom burden and treatments, plus validated outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 318 individuals with self-reported CIDP completed the online survey, of whom 128 (40%) considered their current disease burden as satisfactory while 190 (60%) did not. Of 305 patients who answered the treatment satisfaction question, 222(74%) were satisfied with their treatments. Patients who were satisfied with their current symptoms had, on average, better scores in quality of life and disease severity scales, although regression modeling showed that only ability to walk, stable symptoms, and health utility scores were associated with symptom satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction was associated with stable symptoms, use of IVIG, and use of one versus no medication.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of members of the US and Canadian GBS/CIDP Foundations reporting a diagnosis of CIDP were unsatisfied with current symptoms, despite a high level of overall satisfaction with treatments. There is an unmet need for improving long-term outcomes in people with a diagnosis of CIDP, and for studying patient-centered long-term treatment goals.

Development of Lewis-Sumner Syndrome or Multifocal Acquired Demyelinating Sensory and Motor Neuropathy (MADSAM) Following COVID-19 Infection

Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM), also known as asymmetrical or multifocal chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) or Lewis-Sumner syndrome, is a painless asymmetric demyelinating sensorimotor mononeuropathy multiplex and is an atypical and rare variant of CIDP. We report a case of a 48-year-old female who presented with complaints of shortness of breath, fatigue, difficulty walking and speaking, and primarily right unilateral symptoms involving multiple peripheral nerves, the right phrenic nerve, and the facial nerve following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. She was diagnosed with MADSAM after an extensive physical examination, electromyography (EMG), nerve conduction tests, and laboratory testing. She improved following the initiation of long-term treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). To the best of our knowledge, this is the second reported case of MADSAM following a COVID-19 infection. There have been reports of demyelinating diseases of the central and peripheral nervous systems related to COVID-19; however, it remains unclear whether COVID-19 is the causative agent or only a correlative.

Chronic Immune-Mediated Demyelinating Neuropathies

OBJECTIVE

This article is an overview of chronic demyelinating neuropathies and highlights the phenotypic categorization, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies. The clinical and diagnostic characteristics of other chronic demyelinating neuropathies that are common mimics of immune-mediated neuropathies are also discussed.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The underlying pathophysiology of chronic demyelinating neuropathies is heterogeneous, and components of both humoral and cellular immune responses are thought to play a role in the immune-mediated types of chronic demyelinating neuropathy. The role of the humoral response is highlighted with a specific focus on the relatively recent discovery of antibody-mediated antinodal and paranodal demyelinating neuropathies. Additionally, new diagnostic criteria for some of the chronic demyelinating neuropathies, as well as ways to differentiate chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy from other chronic demyelinating polyneuropathies, are discussed.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Chronic demyelinating neuropathies can present with overlapping clinical characteristics with seemingly subtle variations. It is clinically important to differentiate these types of neuropathies because the treatment and management can vary and affect prognosis.

Autonomic nervous system involvement in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a literature review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although dysautonomia is a well-recognized complication of acute demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, it is rarely reported and evaluated in chronic demyelinating neuropathies. The purpose of this review is to search and synthesize the current literature on the prevalence and type of autonomic dysfunction (AD) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting AD in CIDP.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, including 346 patients with CIDP, were found eligible for the review. Seven studies used autonomic tests only as an additional component of the comprehensive clinical evaluation, and found that dysautonomia in CIDP may indicate the presence of a comorbid disease (e.g., diabetes) and facilitate the differentiation of CIDP from other neuropathies (e.g., amyloid neuropathy). Five studies performed quantitative assessment of autonomic function in CIDP as a primary goal. Two studies have used the Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS) to assess severity and distribution of dysautonomia. The reported prevalence of dysautonomia in CIDP during quantitative assessment of autonomic function ranged from 25 to 89%, depending on the battery of tests used, with CASS not exceeding 4 points. The abnormalities in autonomic tests indicated both sympathetic and parasympathetic dysfunction and did not correlate with the duration, severity and variant of CIDP.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical or subclinical involvement of the ANS has been shown to be common and relatively mild in CIDP. The impact of autonomic impairment on disability and of its possible response to therapy in CIDP needs to be further investigated.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Initiation in Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: A US Claims-based Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is recommended as first-line therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), an immune-mediated neuropathy. The clinical profile of patients with CIDP newly initiating IVIG is poorly characterized. This claims-based cohort study describes characteristics of US patients with CIDP initiating IVIG treatment.

METHODS

Adult immunoglobulin (IG)-naïve patients with CIDP diagnosed between 2008 and 2018 and a subgroup of patients subsequently initiating IVIG were identified in the Merative MarketScan Research Databases. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and diagnostic procedures were described for patients initiating IVIG.

RESULTS

Of 32,090 patients with CIDP identified, 3975 (mean age 57 years) subsequently initiated IVIG. In the 6 months prior to IVIG initiation, diagnoses of comorbidities including neuropathy (75%), hypertension (62%), and diabetes (33%) were frequent, as were CIDP features/symptoms/markers of functional status including chronic pain (80%), difficulty walking (30%), and weakness (30%). CIDP-related laboratory/diagnostic procedures were performed in approximately 20- > 40% of patients in the 3 months prior to IVIG initiation (63.7% underwent electrodiagnostic/nerve conduction testing in the 6 months prior to IVIG initiation). Patient characteristics by initial IVIG product differed only in IVIG initiation year, US geographic region, and insurance type. Comorbidities, CIDP severity or functional status markers, and other clinical variables were generally well balanced across initial IVIG product groups.

CONCLUSION

A heavy burden of symptoms, comorbidities, and diagnostic testing exists in patients with CIDP initiating IVIG. Characteristics of patients with CIDP initiating different IVIG products are well balanced, suggesting an absence of clinical or demographic determinants underlying IVIG selection.

Unclassified clinical presentations of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

BACKGROUND

To assess the ability of the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) clinical criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) to include within their classification the whole spectrum of clinical heterogeneity of the disease and to define the clinical characteristics of the unclassifiable clinical forms.

METHODS

The 2021 EAN/PNS clinical criteria for CIDP were applied to 329 patients fulfilling the electrodiagnostic (and in some cases also the supportive) criteria for the diagnosis of CIDP. Clinical characteristics were reviewed for each patient not strictly fulfilling the clinical criteria ('unclassifiable').

RESULTS

At study inclusion, 124 (37.5%) patients had an unclassifiable clinical presentation, including 110 (89%) with a typical CIDP-like clinical phenotype in whom some segments of the four limbs were unaffected by weakness ('incomplete typical CIDP'), 10 (8%) with a mild distal, symmetric, sensory or sensorimotor polyneuropathy confined to the lower limbs with cranial nerve involvement ('cranial nerve predominant CIDP') and 4 (1%) with a symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy limited to the proximal and distal areas of the lower limbs ('paraparetic CIDP'). Eighty-one (65%) patients maintained an unclassifiable presentation during the entire disease follow-up while 13 patients progressed to typical CIDP. Patients with the unclassifiable clinical forms compared with patients with typical CIDP had a milder form of CIDP, while there was no difference in the distribution patterns of demyelination.

CONCLUSIONS

A proportion of patients with CIDP do not strictly fulfil the 2021 EAN/PNS clinical criteria for diagnosis. These unclassifiable clinical phenotypes may pose diagnostic challenges and thus deserve more attention in clinical practice and research.

Molecular, Electrophysiological, and Ultrasonographic Differences in Selected Immune-Mediated Neuropathies with Therapeutic Implications

The spectrum of immune-mediated neuropathies is broad and the different subtypes are still being researched. With the numerous subtypes of immune-mediated neuropathies, establishing the appropriate diagnosis in normal clinical practice is challenging. The treatment of these disorders is also troublesome. The authors have undertaken a literature review of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). The molecular, electrophysiological and ultrasound features of these autoimmune polyneuropathies are analyzed, highlighting the differences in diagnosis and ultimately treatment. The immune dysfunction can lead to damage to the peripheral nervous system. In practice, it is suspected that these disorders are caused by autoimmunity to proteins located in the node of Ranvier or myelin components of peripheral nerves, although disease-associated autoantibodies have not been identified for all disorders. The electrophysiological presence of conduction blocks is another important factor characterizing separate subgroups of treatment-naive motor neuropathies, including multifocal CIDP (synonyms: multifocal demyelinating neuropathy with persistent conduction block), which differs from multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMN) in both responses to treatment modalities and electrophysiological features. Ultrasound is a reliable method for diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies, particularly when alternative diagnostic examinations yield inconclusive results. In overall terms, the management of these disorders includes immunotherapy such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange. Improvements in clinical criteria and the development of more disease-specific immunotherapies should expand the therapeutic possibilities for these debilitating diseases.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Diagnostic problems in clinical practice in Serbia

Making diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is challenging since it can mimic a multitude of disorders, and is misdiagnosed in at least 50% of cases. We sought to determine the frequency of CIDP misdiagnosis in clinical practice in Serbia, to uncover CIDP mimics, and to identify factors that may aid in CIDP diagnosis. Our longitudinal retrospective cohort study included 86 eligible adult patients referred to the Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, with a diagnosis of CIDP. We also included 15 patients referred to us with different diagnoses that ended up having CIDP as their final diagnosis. Exactly half of patients referred as CIDP failed to meet the established diagnostic criteria (non-CIDP) and were given an alternative diagnosis at the first hospitalization. At the 1-year follow-up, the diagnosis was further revised in four subjects. Confirmed CIDP patients usually had their initial diagnosis based on the nerve conduction studies (NCS), a typical presentation with symmetrical involvement of all four limbs, as well as higher frequencies of elevated protein levels and albuminocytologic dissociation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CIDP patients also responded better to immune therapy. We found that 52% of the patients initially referred to our Clinic as CIDP were given other diagnoses after a 1-year follow-up. Out of all CIDP cases, 27% had been unrecognized prior to referral to our Center. Utilization of clear and objective indicators - conclusive NCS, improvement on therapy, and elevated CSF proteins may provide greater certainty in diagnosing CIDP.

Tips in navigating the diagnostic complexities of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

The 2021 guideline of the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) includes important revisions to the previous 2010 guideline. This article highlights the new criteria and recommendations for the differential diagnosis of CIDP. In the revised guideline, the CIDP spectrum has been modified to include typical CIDP and four well-characterized CIDP variants, namely distal, multifocal/focal, motor and sensory CIDP, replacing the term 'atypical' CIDP. To improve the diagnosis of CIDP, the revised guideline attempts to improve the specificity of the diagnostic criteria for typical CIDP and the four CIDP variants. Specific clinical and electrodiagnostic (including both motor and sensory conduction) criteria are provided for typical CIDP and each of the CIDP variants. The levels of diagnostic certainty have been changed to CIDP and possible CIDP, with the removal of probable CIDP (due to the lack of difference in the accuracy of the electrodiagnostic criteria for probable CIDP) and definite CIDP (due to the lack of a gold standard for diagnosis). If the clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria allow only for a diagnosis of possible CIDP, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound, nerve magnetic resonance imaging, objective treatment response, and nerve biopsy can be used as supportive criteria to upgrade the diagnosis to CIDP. Although the revised guideline needs to be validated and its strengths and weaknesses assessed, using the guideline will likely improve the accuracy of diagnosis of CIDP and variants of CIDP, and aid in distinguishing CIDP from conditions with similar features.

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the 2021 EAN/PNS and 2010 EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

OBJECTIVES

To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) with those of the 2010 European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS).

METHODS

Sensitivity and specificity of the two sets of criteria were evaluated in 330 patients with CIDP and 166 axonal peripheral neuropathy controls. Comparison of the utility of nerve conduction studies with different number of nerves examined and of the sensitivity and specificity of the two criteria in typical CIDP and its variants were assessed.

RESULTS

EFNS/PNS criteria had a sensitivity of 92% for possible CIDP and 85% for probable/definite CIDP, while the EAN/PNS criteria had a sensitivity of 83% for possible CIDP and 74% for CIDP. Using supportive criteria, the sensitivity of the EAN/PNS criteria for possible CIDP increased to 85% and that of CIDP to 77%, remaining lower than that of the EFNS/PNS criteria. Specificity of the EFNS/PNS criteria was 68% for possible CIDP and 84% for probable/definite CIDP, while the EAN/PNS criteria had a specificity of 88% for possible CIDP and 98% for CIDP. More extended studies increased the sensitivity of both sets of criteria by 4%-7% but reduced their specificity by 2%-3%. The EFNS/PNS criteria were more sensitive for the diagnosis of typical CIDP while the EAN/PNS criteria were more specific for the diagnosis of distal and sensory CIDP.

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, the EAN/PNS criteria were more specific but less sensitive than the EFNS/PNS criteria. With the EAN/PNS criteria, more extended nerve conduction studies are recommended to obtain an acceptable sensitivity while maintaining a high specificity.

Autoantibodies in central nervous system and neuromuscular autoimmune disorders: A narrative review

The discovery of novel autoantibodies in neurological disorders contributes to a better understanding of its pathogenesis, improves the accuracy of diagnosis, and leads to new treatment strategies. Advances in techniques for the screening and detection of autoantibodies have enabled the discovery of new antibodies in the central nervous system (CNS) and neuromuscular diseases. Cell-based assays using live or fixed cells overexpressing target antigens are widely used for autoantibody-based diagnosis in clinical practice. Common pathogenic autoantibodies are unknown in most patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Novel pathogenic autoantibodies to aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) have been identified in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and MOG antibody-associated disease, respectively. These diseases have clinical similarities to MS, but with the discovery of pathogenic autoantibodies, they are now recognized as distinct disease entities. Antibodies to paranodal membrane proteins such as neurofascin-155, contactin‑1, contactin‑associated protein‑1 in CIDP and muscle-specific kinase and low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 4 in myasthenia gravis were added to the profiles of autoantibodies in neurological disorders. Despite the relatively low frequency of seropositivity, autoantibody detection is currently essential for the clinical diagnosis of CNS and neuromuscular autoimmune disorders, and differential approaches to seropositive patients will contribute to more personalized medicine. We reviewed recent discoveries of autoantibodies and their clinical implications in CNS and neuromuscular disorders.

The neurophysiological lesson from the Italian CIDP database

INTRODUCTION

Electrophysiological diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) may be challenging. Thus, with the aim ofproviding some practical advice in electrophysiological approach to a patient with suspected CIDP, we analyzed electrophysiological data from 499 patients enrolled inthe Italian CIDP Database.

METHODS

We calculated the rate of each demyelinating feature, the rate of demyelinating features per nerve, the diagnostic rate for upper andlower limb nerves, and, using a ROC curve analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of each couple of nerves and each demyelinating feature, for every CIDP subtype.Moreover, we compared the electrophysiological data of definite and probable CIDP patients with those of possible and not-fulfilling CIDP patients, and by a logisticregression analysis, we estimated the odds ratio (OR) to make an electrophysiological diagnosis of definite or probable CIDP.

RESULTS

The ulnar nerve had the highestrate of demyelinating features and, when tested bilaterally, had the highest diagnostic accuracy except for DADS in which peroneal nerves were the most informative.In possible and not-fulfilling CIDP patients, a lower number of nerves and proximal temporal dispersion (TD) measurements had been performed compared to definiteand probable CIDP patients. Importantly, OR for each tested motor nerve and each TD measurement was 1.59 and 1.33, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findingsdemonstrated that the diagnosis of CIDP may be missed due to inadequate or incomplete electrophysiological examination or interpretation. At the same time, thesedata taken together could be useful to draw a thoughtful electrophysiological approach to patients suspected of CIDP.

Electrodiagnostic Assessment of Polyneuropathy

This article focuses on principles of nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography applied to the electrodiagnosis of polyneuropathy. The components of the electrodiagnostic evaluation of polyneuropathy and the electrophysiological characteristics of axonal and demyelinating neuropathies and nodo-paranodopathies are reviewed.

Atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: recent advances on classification, diagnosis, and pathogenesis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, there has been an intense debate in literature regarding the definition of the individual variants of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), their possible pathogenetic mechanisms, and impact in the diagnosis of CIDP.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2021 European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) guidelines revised the definition of the individual CIDP variants and implemented their diagnostic criteria. Diagnosis of atypical CIDP is challenging and misdiagnosis is frequent, leading to diagnostic delay and consequent greater accumulation of disability and treatment dependency. Recent studies suggest that patients with typical CIDP have an antibody-mediated mechanism of neuropathy whereas in those with Lewis--Sumner syndrome (LSS) neuropathy is preferentially mediated by macrophages and T cells.

SUMMARY

Although the validity of the 2021 EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria for atypical CIDP is unknown, they will hopefully lead to greater uniformity in the selection of patients to be enrolled in future studies and to a greater diagnostic accuracy. New data are emerging on the possible pathological mechanisms of individual variants and this could result in the discovery of specific diagnostic biomarkers and new therapies.

Posturography as a biomarker of intravenous immunoglobulin efficacy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Imbalance is a common feature of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) exerts clinical benefit in CIDP, including improving balance, although objective markers of efficacy are lacking. Posturography is an established objective marker of balance; therefore, this study aimed to determine the utility of posturography as an objective marker of treatment efficacy in CIDP.

METHODS

Posturography was performed on 18 CIDP patients, established on IVIg infusions, and results were compared to age-matched healthy controls. CIDP patients were assessed just prior to IVIg infusion and at the mid-point of the cycle. Center of pressure (CoP) was measured and the total path traveled by CoP (Sway Path, SP) was calculated for five different conditions: feet placed in parallel 16 cm apart at the medial border with eyes open (16cmEO) and eyes closed (16cmEC); medial borders of the feet touching with eyes open (0cmEO) and eyes closed (0cmEC); and tandem stance.

RESULTS

The sway path (SP) was significantly increased in CIDP patients (mean SP 1191 ± 104 mm) when compared to healthy controls (mean SP 724 ± 26 mm, P < .001). The increase was most prominent during eyes closed and tandem stance conditions. Treatment with IVIg significantly reduced SP when assessing 0cmEC (1759 ± 324 mm vs. 1081 ± 134 mm, P = .019) and tandem stance (1775 ± 290 mm vs. 1152 ± 113 mm, P = .027).

DISCUSSION

Posturography detected significant improvements in balance following IVIg in CIDP patients established on maintenance therapy. As such, posturography may be considered an objective marker of treatment response in clinical management and therapeutic trials.

Neuropathies périphériques associées aux syndromes lymphoprolifératifs : spectre clinique et démarche diagnostique

Lymphoproliferative syndromes (multiple myeloma, Waldenström's disease, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, lymphomas) may be associated with peripheral neuropathies. The mechanism can be dysimmune, associated or not with monoclonal gammopathies; paraneoplastic; infiltrative; or more commonly, iatrogenic or due to vitamin deficiency. The diagnosis can be complex, especially when the neuropathy is the presenting manifestation, requiring a close cooperation between internists and neurologists. The positive diagnosis of the neuropathy is based on a systematic electro-clinical investigation, which specifies the topography and the mechanism of the nerve damage, sometimes reinforced by imaging examinations, in particular, nerve and/or plexus MRI. The imputability of the neuropathy to a lymphoproliferative syndrome is based on a set of arguments including the clinical context (B signs, tumour syndrome), first-line laboratory tests (hemogram, protein electrophoresis, viral serologies, complement), auto-antibodies discussed according to the neuropathy (anti-MAG, anti-gangliosides) and sometimes more invasive examinations (bone marrow or neuro-muscular biopsies).

Outcome measures and biomarkers in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: from research to clinical practice

Introduction: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated syndrome characterized clinically by weakness and/or numbness that evolves over 2 months or more. The heterogeneity of clinical features necessitates an individualized approach to disease monitoring that takes lessons learned from clinical trials and applies them to clinical practice.Areas covered: This review discusses the importance of clinimetrics and biomarkers in CIDP diagnosis and disease monitoring. Highlighted are the challenges of defining responses to immunotherapy, the usefulness, and limitations of utilizing evidence-based clinical outcome measures during routine clinical care, and the evolving understanding of how diagnostic and disease activity biomarkers may reshape our treatment and disease monitoring paradigms.Expert opinion: Although disability and impairment outcome measures are commonly used in CIDP to indicate disease status, the nonspecific nature of these metrics limits the ability to attribute a change in any given metric to a change in CIDP. This interpretive challenge may be magnified by inconsistencies in the direction of change as well as a strong placebo effect. There is a need to improve our understanding of minimally important changes in existing outcome measures as a means to personalize treatment and to better assess disease activity status with biomarker discovery.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Autoantibodies for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

Objectives: To review the available evidence on sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody detection in diagnosing a specific subset of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and to calculate the frequencies of different autoantibodies to paranodal proteins. Background: Diagnosis of CIDP relies on clinical and neurophysiologic criteria and lacks useful diagnostic biomarkers. A subset of CIDP patients exhibit atypical clinical phenotypes and impaired response to conventional treatments. These patients were reported as having autoantibodies targeting paranodal protein neurofascin isoform 155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1), and contactin-associated protein-1 (CASPR1). Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to summarize evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic value of these autoantibodies, especially for anti-NF155 antibody. Methods: We searched the following electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science. Eligible studies provided information to calculate the frequencies of anti-NF155 antibody and anti-CNTN1 antibody, the sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody, and the incidence of improvement and deterioration among anti-NF155 antibody seropositive CIDP patients. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q and I ² statistics. Results: The pooled frequency of anti-NF155 autoantibody across 14 studies was 7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.10] with high heterogeneity; the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody for the diagnosis of a specific subgroup of CIDP patients were 0.45 (95% CI: 0.29-0.63) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97), respectively. Conclusions: For diagnosing of a specific subset of CIDP characterized by poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), we found a moderate sensitivity and a high specificity. The anti-NF155 antibody test should be used as a confirmatory test rather than a screening test. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020203385 and CRD42020190789.

The neurophysiological lesson from the Italian CIDP database

Introduction

Electrophysiological diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) may be challenging. Thus, with the aim ofproviding some practical advice in electrophysiological approach to a patient with suspected CIDP, we analyzed electrophysiological data from 499 patients enrolled inthe Italian CIDP Database.

Methods

We calculated the rate of each demyelinating feature, the rate of demyelinating features per nerve, the diagnostic rate for upper andlower limb nerves, and, using a ROC curve analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of each couple of nerves and each demyelinating feature, for every CIDP subtype.Moreover, we compared the electrophysiological data of definite and probable CIDP patients with those of possible and not-fulfilling CIDP patients, and by a logisticregression analysis, we estimated the odds ratio (OR) to make an electrophysiological diagnosis of definite or probable CIDP.

Results

The ulnar nerve had the highestrate of demyelinating features and, when tested bilaterally, had the highest diagnostic accuracy except for DADS in which peroneal nerves were the most informative.In possible and not-fulfilling CIDP patients, a lower number of nerves and proximal temporal dispersion (TD) measurements had been performed compared to definiteand probable CIDP patients. Importantly, OR for each tested motor nerve and each TD measurement was 1.59 and 1.33, respectively.

Conclusion

Our findingsdemonstrated that the diagnosis of CIDP may be missed due to inadequate or incomplete electrophysiological examination or interpretation. At the same time, thesedata taken together could be useful to draw a thoughtful electrophysiological approach to patients suspected of CIDP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-021-05321-z.

Comprehensive approaches for diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common chronic inflammatory neuropathy. CIDP is diagnosed according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) criteria, which combine clinical features with the electrophysiological evidence of demyelination. However, firstly, diagnosis is challenging, as some patients e.g. with severe early axonal damage do not fulfil the criteria. Secondly, objective and reliable tools to monitor the disease course are lacking. Thirdly, about 25% of CIDP patients do not respond to evidence-based first-line therapy. Recognition of these patients is difficult and treatment beyond first-line therapy is based on observational studies and case series only. Individualized immunomodulatory treatment does not exist due to the lack of understanding of essential aspects of the underlying pathophysiology.

Novel diagnostic imaging techniques and molecular approaches can help to solve these problems but do not find enough implementation. This review gives a comprehensive overview of novel diagnostic techniques and monitoring approaches for CIDP and how these can lead to individualized treatment and better understanding of pathophysiology.