Chronic Hepatitis C Treatment in Patients with Drug Injection History: Findings of the INTEGRATE Prospective, Observational Study

Use of health care services by people with substance use disorders in Belgium: a register-based cohort study

Background

The objective of the study was to describe the frequencies of health-care utilization by people with substance use disorder (SUD), including contacts with general practitioners (GP), psychiatrists, emergency departments (ED) and hospital admissions and to compare this frequency to the general population.

Methods

Data from the national register of people who were in treatment for SUD between 2011 and 2014 was linked to health care data from the Belgian health insurance (N = 30,905). Four comparators were matched on age, sex and place of residence to each subject in treatment for SUD (N = 123,620). Cases were further divided in five mutually exclusive categories based on the main SUD (opiates, crack/cocaine, stimulants, cannabis and alcohol). We calculated the average number of contacts with GP, psychiatrists and ED, and hospital admissions per person over a ten year period (2008–2017), computed descriptive statistics for each of the SUD and used negative binomial regression models to compare cases and comparators.

Results

Over the ten-year period, people in treatment for SUD overall had on average 60 GP contacts, 3.9 psychiatrist contacts, 7.8 visits to the ED, and 16 hospital admissions. Rate ratios, comparing cases and corresponding comparators, showed that people in treatment for SUD had on average 1.9 more contacts with a GP (95 % CI 1.9-2.0), 7.4 more contacts with a psychiatrist (95 % CI 7.0-7.7), 4.2 more ED visits (95 % CI 4.2–4.3), and 6.4 more hospital admissions (95 % CI 6.3–6.5).

Conclusions

The use of health services for people with SUD is between almost two (GP) and seven times (psychiatrist) higher than for comparators. People in treatment for alcohol use disorders use health care services more frequently than people in treatment for other SUD. The use of health services remained stable in the five years before and after the moment people with SUD entered into treatment for SUD. The higher use of primary health care services by people with SUD might indicate that they have higher health care needs than comparators.

High rates of early HCV reinfection after DAA treatment in people with recent drug use attended at mobile harm reduction units

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The World Health Organization recently called for the elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and has identified people who inject drugs (PWID) as a key target population. Clinical trials analyzing currently available all-oral regimens have demonstrated a high degree of efficacy in this population, with a relatively low reinfection rate. There is an urgent need to confirm these data in a harm reduction and active consumption setting. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the HCV reinfection rate in people with recent drug use followed at low-threshold mobile harm reduction units.

METHOD

We included people with recent drug use (smoked or injected heroin/cocaine in the previous 6 months) who received HCV treatment and were attended at two low-threshold mobile harm reduction units over 19 months. Sustained virologic response was assessed 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12). The incidence density of HCV reinfection was defined as the number of reinfections per 100-person years (PY) using person-time of observation and was stratified by drug consumption at initiation of HCV treatment. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with reinfection.

RESULTS

During the study period, 160 people who used drugs in the past 6 months completed HCV therapy. 122 (73.9%) and 88 (53.3%) reported injecting drug use in the 6 months and 30 days prior to HCV treatment, respectively. The overall SVR12 was 68% in the ITT analysis (reinfection = failure) and 90.7% in the modified intent-to-treat analysis (considering reinfections as response and removing people who were missing SVR data). The cohort at-risk for reinfection (n = 121) included 47 (39.2%) people who initiated HCV treatment with recently reported abstinence. Reinfection was identified in 10 persons (8.3%), and the median time to reinfection was 7.2 (IQR 4.2-18) months. Total follow-up time at-risk was 101.1-PY (median 0.6 years, IQR 0.3-1.3). The overall incidence of reinfection was 9.8 per 100-PY (95% CI 4.7,18.2). The incidence of reinfection was higher amongst those who had injected drugs in the previous 6 months (16.7 [95%CI 8.0; 30.7] per 100-PY) and in the previous 30 days (18.9 [95% CI 8.1; 37.2] per 100-PY). In the adjusted analysis, only injecting drugs use in the month prior to initiation of HCV therapy was associated with reinfection (aHR 8.7, 95%CI 1.0; 73.6; p 0.04).

CONCLUSION

High efficacy of HCV treatment, was found in people with recent drug use attended and followed at low-threshold mobile harm reduction units. The high rate of early HCV reinfections in this setting should promote surveillance for reinfection at 7-month intervals after ending the treatment or earlier.

Hepatitis C Treatment in Patients with Drug Addiction Is Effective or Not Effective?

Introduction

Patients with drug addiction have high risk for hepatitis C virus (HCV). Effective treatment response is essential to optimize treatment for drug abusers infected by hepatitis C virus.

Aim

The aim of this present study was to show that hepatitis C treatment in patients with drug addiction is effective like patients without drug addiction.

Material and Methods

Total amount of 57 patients with hepatitis C (25 drug abuser and 32 non-drug abuser) that referred to Shahid Motahari clinic of Shiraz were selected. All patients infected with HCV treated by combination regimens of ribavirin, sofosbuvir and interferon. Patients received sofosbuvir (400mg once a day) in combination with peg-IFN-alpha (92a180m/w›92b1/5m/kg/w) and RBV (under 75 kg 1000mg, over 75 kg 12000kg) for 12 weeks. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for testing normality. Associations between variables were analyzed using a Chi-square, Fisher exact, T student and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

Out of 25 HCV patients (43.9%) were drug addicts and 32 patients (56.1%) were non-drug addicts. Insomnia (61.4%), fatigue (63.1%) and debility (49.1%) were more common adverse effects of therapy in drug abusers and non-drug abusers. Alanine transaminase (ALT) and HCV RNA was normal in the end of therapy (EOT). White blood cell (WBC) count decreased in during two-week after starting of the treatment and then increased to normal levels at the end of treatment. Reduction of WBC count was considerable in during two-week. Hematologic result was not considerable. Reduction of hemoglobin was <10 g/dL in 9.37% of non-injecting drug addicts and <8.5 g/dL in 6.25% of injecting drug addicts. The results of this study did not demonstrated a significant relationship about sustained virologic response (SVR) between the drug abusers and non-drug abusers (P = 0.99).

Conclusions

In conclusion, patients with drug addiction can receive hepatitis C treatment on the history of their past or current drug use status. Combination therapy with sofosbuvir plus peginterferon and ribavirin can lead to high treatment response in HCV patients were drug abuser. In addition, this treatment combination was with low discontinuation rates and low adverse effects. Effective intervention in HCV patients with drug addiction to reduce injection- related risk.

Outpatient directly observed therapy for hepatitis C among people who use drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomised studies that assessed the effectiveness of directly observed hepatitis C medication therapy delivered in outpatient clinics compared to treatment as usual. Methods: We completed a systematic literature review up to the end of August 2017, including online databases, study abstracts and references of pertinent articles. We assessed the results of randomised studies using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias assessment tool, and observational studies using the ROBINS-I tool. From each study, we extracted the number of patients who did or did not attain sustained virological response (SVR). We utilised a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model for our meta-analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42014012957). Results: We included six studies with 407 patients in our systematic review; four of those studies (215 patients) used randomisation and were included in our meta-analysis. Overall effect estimates showed that compared to treatment as usual, directly observed therapy demonstrated significantly higher odds of SVR attainment (odds ratio 2.01, 95% confidence interval 1.13-3.59). Conclusion: Among people who use drugs, directly observed therapy may lead to higher odds of attaining SVR. Further research on the best ways to use directly observed therapy to administer HCV therapy to people who use drugs is warranted.