1
|
Hansford HJ, Cashin AG, Jones MD, Swanson SA, Islam N, Douglas SRG, Rizzo RRN, Devonshire JJ, Williams SA, Dahabreh IJ, Dickerman BA, Egger M, Garcia-Albeniz X, Golub RM, Lodi S, Moreno-Betancur M, Pearson SA, Schneeweiss S, Sterne JAC, Sharp MK, Stuart EA, Hernán MA, Lee H, McAuley JH. Reporting of Observational Studies Explicitly Aiming to Emulate Randomized Trials: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2336023. [PMID: 37755828 PMCID: PMC10534275 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Observational (nonexperimental) studies that aim to emulate a randomized trial (ie, the target trial) are increasingly informing medical and policy decision-making, but it is unclear how these studies are reported in the literature. Consistent reporting is essential for quality appraisal, evidence synthesis, and translation of evidence to policy and practice. Objective To assess the reporting of observational studies that explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial. Evidence Review We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for observational studies published between March 2012 and October 2022 that explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial of a health or medical intervention. Two reviewers double-screened and -extracted data on study characteristics, key predefined components of the target trial protocol and its emulation (eligibility criteria, treatment strategies, treatment assignment, outcome[s], follow-up, causal contrast[s], and analysis plan), and other items related to the target trial emulation. Findings A total of 200 studies that explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial were included. These studies included 26 subfields of medicine, and 168 (84%) were published from January 2020 to October 2022. The aim to emulate a target trial was explicit in 70 study titles (35%). Forty-three studies (22%) reported use of a published reporting guideline (eg, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology). Eighty-five studies (43%) did not describe all key items of how the target trial was emulated and 113 (57%) did not describe the protocol of the target trial and its emulation. Conclusion and Relevance In this systematic review of 200 studies that explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial, reporting of how the target trial was emulated was inconsistent. A reporting guideline for studies explicitly aiming to emulate a target trial may improve the reporting of the target trial protocols and other aspects of these emulation attempts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harrison J. Hansford
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aidan G. Cashin
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew D. Jones
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sonja A. Swanson
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- CAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nazrul Islam
- Oxford Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Susan R. G. Douglas
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rodrigo R. N. Rizzo
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jack J. Devonshire
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sam A. Williams
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Issa J. Dahabreh
- CAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Barbra A. Dickerman
- CAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthias Egger
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Xabier Garcia-Albeniz
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- RTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Robert M. Golub
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sara Lodi
- CAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Margarita Moreno-Betancur
- Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sallie-Anne Pearson
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sebastian Schneeweiss
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan A. C. Sterne
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Health Data Research UK South-West, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa K. Sharp
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Elizabeth A. Stuart
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Miguel A. Hernán
- CAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hopin Lee
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - James H. McAuley
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sari A, Ekinci O, Saraçoğlu KT, Balık R, Aslan M, Balık Y, Önal C, Aslan M, Cevher S, Parmaksız A, Vatansever Ş, Çicek MC, Ayan ÖS, Şensöz Çelik G, Toprak A, Yılmaz M, Yurt E, Bakan N, Tekin S, Adıyeke E. A Comparison of the Effects of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone, Used on Level-3 Intensive Care COVID-19 Patients, on Mortality: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e232. [PMID: 37489719 PMCID: PMC10366414 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is often a mild disease, usually manifesting with respiratory complaints, and is sometimes mortal due to multiple organ failure. Hyperinflammation is a known COVID-19 component and is associated with organ dysfunction, disease severity and mortality. Controlling hyperinflammatory response is crucial in determining treatment direction. An important agent in providing this control is corticosteroids. This study aimed to determine whether dexamethasone and methylprednisolone, doses, administration time and duration in COVID-19 treatment are associated with improved treatment outcomes. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study was conducted with participation of 6 healthcare centers which collected data by retrospectively examining files of 1,340 patients admitted to intensive care unit due to COVID-19 between March 2020 and September 2021, diagnosed with polymerase chain reaction (+) and/or clinically and radiologically. RESULTS Mortality in the pulse methylprednisolone group was statistically significantly higher than that in the other 3 groups. Mortality was higher in older patients with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney failure, coronary artery disease, and dementia. Pulse and mini-pulse steroid doses were less effective than standard methylprednisolone and dexamethasone doses, pulse steroid doses being associated with high mortality. Standard-dose methylprednisolone and dexamethasone led to similar effects, but standard dose methylprednisolone was more effective in severe patients who required mechanical ventilation (MV). Infection development was related to steroid treatment duration, not cumulative steroid dose. CONCLUSION Corticosteroids are shown to be beneficial in critical COVID-19, but the role of early corticosteroids in mild COVID-19 patients remains unclear. The anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroids may have a positive effect by reducing mortality in severe COVID-19 patients. Although dexamethasone was first used for this purpose, methylprednisolone was found to be as effective at standard doses. Methylprednisolone administered at standard doses was associated with greater PaO2/FiO2 ratios than dexamethasone, especially in the severe group requiring MV. High dose pulse steroid doses are closely associated with mortality and standard methylprednisolone dose is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Sari
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Osman Ekinci
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kemal Tolga Saraçoğlu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Recep Balık
- Department of İnfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Health Sciences University Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mesut Aslan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yelda Balık
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ceren Önal
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Aslan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Semra Cevher
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Aylin Parmaksız
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Şeule Vatansever
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Münire Canan Çicek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Özge Sayın Ayan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Gaye Şensöz Çelik
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Açelya Toprak
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Yılmaz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Emine Yurt
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Health Sciences University Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Nurten Bakan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Sancaktepe Şehit Prof Dr Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Selda Tekin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Sancaktepe Şehit Prof Dr Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Esra Adıyeke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation/Intensive Care, Sancaktepe Şehit Prof Dr Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Langer-Gould A, Xu S, Myers LC, Chen A, Greene JD, Creekmur B, Bruxvoort K, Adams JL, Liu V, Gould MK. High-dose corticosteroids in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia: an observational study of comparative effectiveness. Int J Infect Dis 2022; 125:184-191. [PMID: 36404464 PMCID: PMC9621697 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess whether high- compared with low-dose corticosteroids started upon hospitalization reduce mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia or in subgroups stratified by severity of respiratory impairment on admission. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who required oxygen supplementation upon hospitalization between March 1 and December 31, 2020. In-hospital death was analyzed using logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting of receiving low- or high-dose corticosteroid (dexamethasone 6-10 mg daily or >10-20 mg daily or other corticosteroid equivalents). RESULTS We analyzed 13,366 patients who received low-dose and 948 who received high-dose corticosteroids, of whom 31.3% and 40.4% had severe respiratory impairment (>15 l/min of oxygen or mechanical ventilation) upon admission, respectively. There were no differences in the propensity score-adjusted odds of death (odds ratio 1.17, 95% CI 0.72-1.90) or infections (odds ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.44-1.11) for patients who received high-dose compared with low-dose corticosteroids, beginning on the day of admission. No significant differences in subgroups stratified by severity of respiratory impairment were found. CONCLUSION Initiating high-dose compared with low-dose corticosteroids among newly hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia did not improve survival. However, benefit of high-dose corticosteroids in specific subgroups cannot be excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Langer-Gould
- Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Neurology Department, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, USA.
| | - Stanley Xu
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, USA
| | - Laura C Myers
- Division of Research and The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, USA
| | - Aiyu Chen
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, USA
| | - John D Greene
- Division of Research and The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, USA
| | - Beth Creekmur
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, USA
| | - Katia Bruxvoort
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, USA
| | - John L Adams
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Effectiveness and Safety Research, Pasadena, USA; Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, USA
| | - Vincent Liu
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, USA
| | - Michael K Gould
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, USA
| |
Collapse
|