H-Wave® Device Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Study

A Long-Term Retrospective Observational Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF) in the Treatment of Back Pain

INTRODUCTION

Chronic back pain is a long-lasting disorder that is significantly associated with a reduction in the quality of life. Previously, the efficacy of intradiscal and epidural injections of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) was demonstrated at 6 months. The objective of this study was to retrospectively examine the medical records of these patients in order to determine whether the observed improvement at the 6-month follow-up was sustained over time.

METHODS

PRGF efficacy was evaluated using validated questionnaires: Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) Pain score, COMI Disability score, COMI total score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Furthermore, an evaluation was conducted to determine whether the patients had undergone additional treatments.

RESULTS

the results demonstrated that 85.2% of the 27 patients who were enrolled exhibited sustained improvement across all scales over a median follow-up period of 24 months. The results of all questionnaires administered at 24 months exhibited statistically significant differences when compared to the baseline data (p < 0.01). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between the results reported at 6 months and those at 24 months (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

the results of this retrospective study demonstrate that treatment of chronic back pain with PRGF was effective in maintaining pain reduction and improving function for at least 24 months after the end of treatment.

Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study With 12 Months of Follow-Up

Introduction The knee, the most frequently affected joint in osteoarthritis (OA), impacts the life quality of millions of individuals globally, resulting in a considerable healthcare burden. Conservative treatments are preferred, turning to surgical intervention when necessary. Nonetheless, these conventional modalities have drawbacks. Recently, the use of regenerative medicine therapies, including autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics (APBOs), such as leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (LP-PRP), has evolved and demonstrated the ability to manage knee OA. The primary objective of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy of LP-PRP via widely used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in grade I or II (on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale) knee OA patients. The secondary objective was to characterize the formulated LP-PRP and determine the efficiency of the leukodepletion filter used for leukocyte removal and platelet recovery. Methods This investigation was a retrospective analysis of data collected from patients treated at a single center over a period of 15 months. Data from 40 patients included in this study were intra-articularly injected with 3mL of formulated LP-PRP under ultrasound guidance. PROMs questionnaires, including Kujala and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, were used and responses were documented at baseline and up to 12 months follow-up. The characterization of the formulated LP-PRP and the efficiency of the leukodepletion filter in removing leukocytes and recovering platelets were assessed via complete blood count (CBC) analysis. Results The intra-articular administration of LP-PRP resulted in statistically significant improvements in Kujala and WOMAC scores in patients with Grade I or II OA of the knee at all follow-up time points (four to 12 months) compared to the respective baseline scores. The subgroup analysis showed significant improvements in Kujala and WOMAC scores in both male and female grade I or II knee OA patients with or without comorbidities, including diabetes and/or hypertension. The characterization of formulated PRP showed platelet concentration to be at least 6x compared to the baseline whole blood levels, the absolute platelet count to be at least 5 billion, and total leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and RBCs were depleted by over 88%, 82%, 98%, and 98%, respectively. In addition, the utilization of the PuriBlood leukocyte reduction filter (Puriblood Medical Co. Ltd., Baoshan Township, Taiwan) led to the depletion of approximately 93% of leukocytes and the recovery of about 83% of platelets. Conclusions Administration of LP-PRP resulted in significant improvements in pain and function of patients suffering from grade I or II OA of the knee. In addition, the leukodepletion filter used to formulate LP-PRP, successfully resulted in the depletion of leukocytes while recovering the platelets. More sufficiently powered, multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, and randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to further establish the effectiveness of this formulation in knee OA patients.

H-Wave® Device Stimulation for Chronic Neck Pain: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic neck pain (cNP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, often being refractory to conventional forms of treatment. Various forms of electrical stimulation have been proposed to decrease pain and improve function. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for treatment of cNP have rarely been published.

METHODS

An independent retrospective statistical analysis of PROMs data for users of H-Wave® device stimulation (HWDS), prospectively collected by the device manufacturer over a 4-year period, was conducted. Final surveys for 34,192 pain management patients were filtered for pain chronicity limited to 3-24 months and device use of 22-365 days, resulting in 11,503 patients with "all diagnoses"; this number was further reduced to 1482 patients with cNP, sprain, or strain.

RESULTS

Neck pain was reduced by 3.13 points (0-10 pain scale), with significant (≥ 20%) relief in 86.6%. Function/activities of daily living (ADL) improved in 96.19%, while improved work performance was reported in 84.76%. Medication use decreased or stopped in 65.42% and sleep improved in 60.39%. Over 95% reported having expectations met or exceeded, service satisfaction, and confidence in device use, while no adverse events were reported. Subgroup analyses found positive benefit associations with longer duration of device use.

CONCLUSION

Near-equivalent outcomes were self-reported by cNP HWDS patients as for (previously published) chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients. HWDS provided effective and safe cNP relief, improvements in function and ADL, along with additional benefits including decreased medication use, better sleep, and improved work performance.

The effect of EMS, IFC, and TENS on patient-reported outcome measures for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Transcutaneous electrotherapies have been widely used to treat CLBP but, with the partial exception of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), their effect on pain, disability, quality-of-life, and psychosocial outcomes have not been systematically reviewed. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to clarify the overall effect of transcutaneous electrotherapies on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in CLBP patients.

Methods

Four databases and two study registries were searched for studies that utilized transcutaneous electrotherapies as a primary intervention for CLBP, compared against active or passive controls. Two reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed risk of bias. Studies were grouped by intervention vs. comparison, and by time of follow-up. Meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate.

Results

A total of 89 full-text were assessed for eligibility; 14 studies were included, with 6 in the meta-analyses (all TENS or mixed TENS). Pain: meta-analyses revealed no significant difference for TENS vs. active control, TENS vs. passive control, or mixed TENS vs. active control at post-intervention, nor for mixed TENS vs. active control at 1-month post-intervention. Interferential current (IFC) was more effective than active control (2 studies), while electromyostimulation (EMS) was generally superior to passive, but not active, controls (6 studies).

Disability

Meta-analyses revealed no significant difference for TENS vs. active control at post-intervention, mixed TENS vs. active control at post-intervention, or mixed TENS vs. active control at 1-month post-intervention. IFC was more effective than active control (2 studies), while the EMS results were mixed (6 studies). We were unable to perform meta-analyses for quality-of-life or psychosocial outcomes.

Conclusion

There is moderate evidence that TENS is similar to all controls for improving pain and disability. There is limited evidence that IFC is superior to active controls for improving pain and disability. There is limited evidence that EMS is superior to passive but not active controls for improving pain, and similar to all controls for improving disability.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=452851, Identifier (CRD42023452851).

Exosomes for the Management of Low Back Pain: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence

Low back pain affects millions of people, creating an enormous financial burden on the global healthcare system. Traditional treatment modalities are short-lived and have shortcomings. Recently, orthobiologics, including extracellular vesicles or exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells, have markedly increased for managing musculoskeletal conditions. Here, the primary aim is to review the outcomes of clinical studies using extracellular vesicles or exosomes for treating low back pain. Numerous databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar) were searched using terms for the intervention 'exosomes' and the treatment 'low back pain' for studies published in English to March 18, 2024. Articles utilizing exosomes for the management of low back pain were included. Articles not utilizing exosomes, not explicitly stating the presence of exosomes in their formulation, or not targeting low back pain were excluded. Two articles that met our pre-defined criteria were included in this review. The results showed that administering extracellular vesicles or exosomes is safe and potentially effective in patients suffering from low back pain. Yet, more sufficiently powered, multi-center, prospective, randomized, and non-randomized trials with longer follow-up are essential to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of extracellular vesicles or exosomes derived from various sources and to support its routine clinical use for managing low back pain.