Combined Pupilloplasty and Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens Implantation with DSAEK in a Patient with Traumatic Iridoplegia, Aphakia and Corneal Decompensation

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Aphakic, Aniridic, and Vitrectomized Eyes: A Review

PURPOSE

The aim of this review is to examine the techniques, complications, and outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in aphakic, aniridic, and vitrectomized eyes.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE database (via PubMed), using as keywords "(DMEK) AND (aphakia OR aniridia OR vitrectomy OR vitrectomized)." The research was limited to 10 years (January 2014-March 2024), in view of lack of literature before 2014. Articles, including case reports and case series, were included.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included. No randomized controlled trials were found nor comparative studies with more than 1 technique used. Mean rebubbling rate in complex eyes was 29%, whereas mean endothelial cell loss at 6 months was 37%. The mean postoperative visual acuity improved from 1.47 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution to 0.7 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being more challenging, compared with the techniques reported in literature, DMEK can be considered a valid option for the management of endothelial decompensation in complex eyes, with rebubbling rate and endothelial cell loss at 6 months, which are similar to non-complex eyes.

Temporary iris-lens diaphragm to assist descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in aphakic patients

Purpose

Presenting a simple technique using an inversely implanted contact lens to create a temporary diaphragm to assist DMEK surgery in aphakic, partially aniridic and vitrectomized eyes.

Observations

The postoperative course was without pressure abnormalities and the anterior chamber remained deep. The cornea completely cleared within 3 weeks and remained clear after removal of the contact lens showing a corneal thickness of 544 μm and an intact endothelial cell pattern on endothelial cell microscopy after 3 months.

Conclusion and Importance

The inversely implanted contact lens provides an easily accessible temporary diaphragm, making DMEK surgery a safer procedure even in complex eyes without an adequate posterior barrier.

Filamentous Fungal Keratitis in Greece: A 16-Year Nationwide Multicenter Survey

In a multicenter, prospective study of filamentous fungal keratitis in Greece, predisposing factors, etiology, treatment practices, and outcome, were determined. Corneal scrapings were collected from patients with clinical suspicion of fungal keratitis, and demographic and clinical data were recorded. Fungal identification was based on morphology, molecular methods, and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry. A total of 35 cases were identified in a 16-year study period. Female to male ratio was 1:1.7 and median age 48 years. Corneal injury by plant material, and soft contact lens use were the main risk factors (42.8% and 31.4%, respectively). Trauma was the leading risk factor for men (68.1%), contact lens use (61.5%) for women. Fusarium species were isolated more frequently (n = 21, 61.8%). F. solani was mostly associated with trauma, F. verticillioides and F. proliferatum with soft contact lens use. Other fungi were: Purpureocillium lilacinum (14.7%), Alternaria (11.8%), Aspergillus (8.8%), and Phoma foliaceiphila, Beauveria bassiana and Curvularia spicifera, one case each. Amphotericin B and voriconazole MIC₅₀s against Fusarium were 2 mg/L and 4 mg/L respectively. Antifungal therapy consisted mainly of voriconazole locally or both locally and systemically, alone or in combination with liposomal AmB. Cure/improvement rate with antifungal therapy alone was 52%, keratoplasty was required in 40% of cases, and enucleation in 8%. In conclusion, filamentous fungal keratitis in Greece is rare, but with considerable morbidity. A large proportion of cases resulted in keratoplasty despite appropriate antifungal treatment.Kindly confirm the given name and family name are correctly identified for all authros.ConfirmedJournal instruction requires a city and country for affiliations; however, these are missing in affiliations 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13. Please verify if the provided city and country are correct and amend if necessary.All provided cities and countries are correct.

Implantation of retropupillary iris-claw lenses: A review on surgical management and outcomes

Iris-claw lenses have gained increasing popularity over the last years and are by many surgeons regarded as viable options in eyes with insufficient capsular or zonular support. The iris-claw lens has two haptics with fine fissures for folding (enclavating) the mid-peripheral part of the iris stroma and can either be placed in front of or posterior to the iris. In particular, the retropupillary implantation has been increasingly chosen probably due to having an anatomical position similar to that of the crystalline lens. The present review is based on a literature review and also on the authors' clinical experience with this lens, and it focuses on surgical techniques and outcomes especially related to the characteristics of this lens, having haptics with claws that fixate the lens to the posterior iris. Implanting retropupillary iris-claw lenses has a relatively short learning curve, and there are only few complications reported during surgery. Retropupillary iris-claw lenses have demonstrated generally favourable efficiency and safety. However, the outcomes are probably more influenced by the reason for surgery and eye comorbidity than the lens itself. Albeit seldom reported, the postoperative complications have mostly been related to atrophy of the iris at the site of the haptics, or IOL decentration or disenclavation of one of the haptics. To date, however, there are few randomized clinical trials comparing this lens to other lens alternatives in eyes exhibiting insufficient capsular or zonular support for placing the lens in the ciliary sulcus. In the future, prospective studies with large samples should be performed to gain insights into the long-term safety of retropupillary placed iris-claw lenses, and for comparisons with the various other techniques of lens fixation.

Retropupillary Iris-Claw Intraocular Lenses: A Literature Review

Retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lenses (ICIOLs) have been increasingly chosen by surgeons nowadays as a primary or secondary procedure of IOL implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular or zonular support. They have gained popularity due to their simple fast technique, favourable functional outcomes, and safety. The transition in the ICIOL fixation from prepupillary to a more biologically appropriate retropupillary position and change in the optic design from biconvex to convex-concave have provided better visual outcomes and improved safety. A peer-reviewed literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library using the keywords "retropupillary iris claw" and "iris claw". The search yielded 310 articles that were screened. Forty-three articles on retropupillary ICIOLs were finally found to be relevant and reviewed in full-text versions. The functional outcomes following retropupillary implantation of ICIOLs have been acceptable in eyes with no ocular co-morbidities otherwise. However, the indications for surgery may affect the outcomes. The major postoperative complications directly associated with ICIOLs include pupil ovalization and redislocation. Nevertheless, the rate of disenclavation depends on the experience and skill of the surgeon. This review is based on a literature review, and it focuses on the preoperative evaluation, surgical technique, postoperative outcomes, and associated complications. Prospective randomized trials with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed for comparison with other techniques of IOL fixation and confirmation of long-term safety profile.

Long-term surgical outcomes of primary retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of intraocular lens dislocation

We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of primary retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens (R-IOL) implantation in patients with complete intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation. In this single-center retrospective case series, we reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent R-IOL implantation surgery with pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of IOL dislocation between September 2014 and July 2019. The primary outcome was change in visual acuity (VA) up to 24 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), refractive errors, and endothelial cell count (ECC) over the same period. Data of 103 eyes (98 patients) were analyzed. The mean uncorrected VA was significantly improved at one month postoperatively (− 0.69 logMAR, P < 0.001), compared to the preoperative value. IOP (− 2.3 mmHg, P = 0.008) and ECC (− 333.4 cells/mm², P = 0.027) significantly decreased one month post-surgery and remained stable thereafter. Postoperative mean spherical equivalents were similar to the prediction error throughout the follow-up period. IOP elevation (n = 8, 7.8%), cystoid macular edema (n = 4, 3.9%), and dislocation of the R-IOL (n = 10, 9.7%) were managed successfully. Overall, primary R-IOL implantation with pars plana vitrectomy is effective and safe for correcting IOL dislocation due to various causes.

Iris reconstruction suturing techniques

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

When patients have large iris defects, they may experience debilitating glare, halos, and unfavorable cosmetic appearance. Surgical iris reconstruction can alleviate these symptoms. This article will review current suturing techniques for iris reconstruction, as well as the benefits and drawbacks to various suturing methods. Alternative reconstructive methods are also discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

One of the earliest iris suturing methods described was the McCannel technique. This technique allows direct suturing of the iris using three incisions. The Siepser slipknot is another method used in closed chamber iris suturing techniques. This knot, and its recent modifications, utilizes a sliding knot, which is created outside the eye and slid into place atop the iris defect. The cerclage iris suture, in which small bites are taken around the pupillary circumference, is especially useful when treating a mydriatic pupil. Recently, a number of surgeons have adapted these techniques and developed novel suturing strategies to address complex ocular conditions.

SUMMARY

The various iris suturing methods, as well as alternative techniques including cautery, corneal tattooing, and iris prosthetics, each have unique benefits, providing surgeons with a wide array of tools for iris reconstruction.