Use of Processed Electroencephalography in the Clinical Setting

Non-invasive technology for brain monitoring: definition and meaning of the principal parameters for the International PRactice On TEChnology neuro-moniToring group (I-PROTECT)

Technologies for monitoring organ function are rapidly advancing, aiding physicians in the care of patients in both operating rooms (ORs) and intensive care units (ICUs). Some of these emerging, minimally or non-invasive technologies focus on monitoring brain function and ensuring the integrity of its physiology. Generally, the central nervous system is the least monitored system compared to others, such as the respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal systems, even though it is a primary target in most therapeutic strategies. Frequently, the effects of sedatives, hypnotics, and analgesics are entirely unpredictable, especially in critically ill patients with multiple organ failure. This unpredictability exposes them to the risks of inadequate or excessive sedation/hypnosis, potentially leading to complications and long-term negative outcomes. The International PRactice On TEChnology neuro-moniToring group (I-PROTECT), comprised of experts from various fields of clinical neuromonitoring, presents this document with the aim of reviewing and standardizing the primary non-invasive tools for brain monitoring in anesthesia and intensive care practices. The focus is particularly on standardizing the nomenclature of different parameters generated by these tools. The document addresses processed electroencephalography, continuous/quantitative electroencephalography, brain oxygenation through near-infrared spectroscopy, transcranial Doppler, and automated pupillometry. The clinical utility of the key parameters available in each of these tools is summarized and explained. This comprehensive review was conducted by a panel of experts who deliberated on the included topics until a consensus was reached. Images and tables are utilized to clarify and enhance the understanding of the clinical significance of non-invasive neuromonitoring devices within these medical settings.

A Narrative Review Illustrating the Clinical Utility of Electroencephalogram-Guided Anesthesia Care in Children

The major therapeutic end points of general anesthesia include hypnosis, amnesia, and immobility. There is a complex relationship between general anesthesia, responsiveness, hemodynamic stability, and reaction to noxious stimuli. This complexity is compounded in pediatric anesthesia, where clinicians manage children from a wide range of ages, developmental stages, and body sizes, with their concomitant differences in physiology and pharmacology. This renders anesthetic requirements difficult to predict based solely on a child's age, body weight, and vital signs. Electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring provides a window into children's brain states and may be useful in guiding clinical anesthesia management. However, many clinicians are unfamiliar with EEG monitoring in children. Young children's EEGs differ substantially from those of older children and adults, and there is a lack of evidence-based guidance on how and when to use the EEG for anesthesia care in children. This narrative review begins by summarizing what is known about EEG monitoring in pediatric anesthesia care. A key knowledge gap in the literature relates to a lack of practical information illustrating the utility of the EEG in clinical management. To address this gap, this narrative review illustrates how the EEG spectrogram can be used to visualize, in real time, brain responses to anesthetic drugs in relation to hemodynamic stability, surgical stimulation, and other interventions such as cardiopulmonary bypass. This review discusses anesthetic management principles in a variety of clinical scenarios, including infants, children with altered conscious levels, children with atypical neurodevelopment, children with hemodynamic instability, children undergoing total intravenous anesthesia, and those undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Each scenario is accompanied by practical illustrations of how the EEG can be visualized to help titrate anesthetic dosage to avoid undersedation or oversedation when patients experience hypotension or other physiological challenges, when surgical stimulation increases, and when a child's anesthetic requirements are otherwise less predictable. Overall, this review illustrates how well-established clinical management principles in children can be significantly complemented by the addition of EEG monitoring, thus enabling personalized anesthesia care to enhance patient safety and experience.

Quantitative relationship between anteriorization of alpha oscillations and level of general anesthesia

A typical electroencephalogram (EEG) change induced by general anesthesia is anteriorization-disappearance of occipital alpha oscillations followed by the development of frontal alpha oscillations. Investigating the quantitative relationship between such a specific EEG change and the level of anesthesia has academic and clinical importance. We quantified the degree of anteriorization and investigated its detailed relationship with the level of anesthesia. We acquired 21-electrode EEG data and bispectral index (BIS) values of 50 patients undergoing surgery from before anesthesia induction until after patient arousal. For each epoch of a 10.24-s window with 1-s offsets, we calculated frontal alpha power [Formula: see text], occipital alpha power [Formula: see text], and their difference [Formula: see text] to quantify anteriorization. We calculated Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between these values and the BIS value. We used locally weighted regression to estimate [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] at each BIS value. Thirty-six patients (26 females and 10 males aged 24-85 years) were analyzed. The 95% confidence intervals for the mean of Fisher transformations of Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] and BIS value were [- 0.68, - 0.26], [0.02, 0.62], and [- 1.11, - 0.91], respectively. The change in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] with BIS value showed different patterns by the type of anesthetic agent, whereas that in [Formula: see text] was more consistent with smaller individual variance. Anteriorization, quantified by the difference between frontal and occipital alpha powers, continuously developed in conjunction with general anesthesia. Quantifying anteriorization may provide an objective indicator of the level of anesthesia.

Volatile Versus Intravenous Anesthetics in Cardiac Anesthesia: a Narrative Review

Purpose of the Review

The present review addresses clinicians and gives an overview about the experimental rationale for pharmacological conditioning associated with volatile anesthetics, opioids, and propofol; the current clinical data; and the technical considerations regarding the clinical routine in cardiac anesthesia.

Recent Findings

Volatile anesthetics have been standard of care for general anesthesia for cardiac surgery, especially while using cardiopulmonary bypass. The 2019 published MYRIAD trial was not able to show a difference in mortality or cardiac biomarkers for volatile anesthetics compared to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), raising the question of equivalence with respect to patient outcome.

Summary

Reviewing the literature, the scientific foundation for the belief of clinically relevant conditioning by uninterrupted administration of a volatile anesthetic is weak. TIVA can also be performed safely in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.