Improving the Efficiency of Electrical Stimulation Activities After Spinal Cord Injury

Activity based restorative therapy considerations for children: medical and therapeutic perspectives for the pediatric population

Well-established scientific evidence demonstrates that activity is essential for the development and repair of the central nervous system, yet traditional rehabilitation approaches target muscles only above the lesion as a means of compensation. Activity-Based Rehabilitation (ABR) represents an evolving paradigm shift in neurorehabilitation targeting activation of the neuromuscular system below the lesion. Based on activity-dependent plasticity, ABR offers high intensity activation of the nervous system to optimize the capacity for recovery, while working to offset the chronic complications that occur as a result of neurologic injury. Treatment focus shifts from compensatory training to promotion of restoration of function with special emphasis on normalizing sensory cues and movement kinematics. ABR in children carries special considerations for a developing nervous system and the focus is not just restoring functions but advancing functions in line with typical development. Application of activity-based interventions includes traditional rehabilitation strategies at higher intensity and frequency than in traditional models, including locomotor training, functional electrical stimulation, massed practice, and task specific training, applied across the continuum of care from early intervention to the chronic condition.

Optimization of Protocols Using Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Paralyzed Lower-Limb Muscles to Increase Energy Expenditure in People With Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether using surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for paralyzed lower-limb muscles results in an increase in energy expenditure and whether the number of activated muscles and duty cycle affect the potential increase.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

RESULTS

Energy expenditure during all NMES protocols was significantly higher than the condition without NMES (1.2 ± 0.2 kcal/min), with the highest increase (+51%; +0.7 kcal/min, 95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.2) for the protocol with more muscles activated and the duty cycle with a shorter rest period. A significant decrease in muscle contraction size during NMES was found with a longer stimulation time, more muscles activated, or the duty cycle with a shorter rest period.

CONCLUSION

Using NMES for paralyzed lower-limb muscles can significantly increase energy expenditure compared with sitting without NMES, with the highest increase for the protocol with more muscles activated and the duty cycle with a shorter rest period. Muscle fatigue occurred significantly with the more intense NMES protocols, which might cause a lower energy expenditure in a longer protocol. Future studies should further optimize the NMES parameters and investigate the long-term effects of NMES on weight management in people with SCI.

Electrical stimulation for the treatment of spinal cord injuries: A review of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive functional improvements

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that causes severe loss of motor, sensory and autonomic functions. Additionally, many individuals experience chronic neuropathic pain that is often refractory to interventions. While treatment options to improve outcomes for individuals with SCI remain limited, significant research efforts in the field of electrical stimulation have made promising advancements. Epidural electrical stimulation, peripheral nerve stimulation, and functional electrical stimulation have shown promising improvements for individuals with SCI, ranging from complete weight-bearing locomotion to the recovery of sexual function. Despite this, there is a paucity of mechanistic understanding, limiting our ability to optimize stimulation devices and parameters, or utilize combinatorial treatments to maximize efficacy. This review provides a background into SCI pathophysiology and electrical stimulation methods, before exploring cellular and molecular mechanisms suggested in the literature. We highlight several key mechanisms that contribute to functional improvements from electrical stimulation, identify gaps in current knowledge and highlight potential research avenues for future studies.

Benefits and interval training in individuals with spinal cord injury: A thematic review

BACKGROUND

Arm crank ergometry (ACE), functional electrical stimulation leg cycling exercise (FES-LCE), and the combination of the two (FES hybrid exercise) have all been used as activities to help improve the fitness-related health of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). More recently, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has become popular in the non-disabled community due to its ability to produce greater aerobic fitness benefits or equivalent benefits with reduced time commitment.

OBJECTIVE

This thematic review of the literature sought to determine the potential benefits and practicality of using ACE, FES-LCE, and FES hybrid exercise in an interval training format for individuals with SCI.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were conducted in May 2020 and March 2021 focusing on interval training in individuals with SCI. Pre-defined nested search terms were used to narrow the available literature from 4273 citations to 1362 articles. The titles and abstracts were then reviewed to determine the appropriateness of the articles ending with fifteen articles.

RESULTS

The literature was limited to fifteen articles with low participant numbers (n = 1-20). However, in each article, HIIT protocols either demonstrated a greater improvement in cardiovascular, metabolic, or practicality scores compared to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) protocols, or improvement during relatively brief time commitments.

CONCLUSION

The available literature lacked sufficient numbers of randomized control trials. However, the available evidence is encouraging concerning the potential benefits and practicality of using HIIT (ACE, FES-LCE, or FES hybrid exercise) to improve aerobic and anaerobic capacity and decrease cardiometabolic risk after SCI.

Recruitment order of motor neurons promoted by epidural stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury

Spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) combined with activity-based training can promote motor function recovery in individuals with motor complete spinal cord injury (SCI). The characteristics of motor neuron recruitment, which influence different aspects of motor control, are still unknown when motor function is promoted by scES. Here, we enrolled five individuals with chronic motor complete SCI implanted with a scES unit to study the recruitment order of motor neurons during standing enabled by scES. We recorded high-density electromyography (HD-EMG) signals on the vastus lateralis muscle, and inferred the order of recruitment of motor neurons from the relation between amplitude and conduction velocity of the scES-evoked EMG responses along the muscle fibers. Conduction velocity of scES-evoked responses was modulated over time, while stimulation parameters and standing condition remained constant, with average values ranging between 3.0±0.1 and 4.4±0.3 m/s. We found that the human spinal circuitry receiving epidural stimulation can promote both orderly (according to motor neuron size) and inverse trends of motor neuron recruitment, and that the engagement of spinal networks promoting rhythmic activity may favor orderly recruitment trends. Conversely, the different recruitment trends did not appear to be related with time since injury or scES implant, nor to the ability to achieve independent knees extension, nor to the conduction velocity values. The proposed approach can be implemented to investigate the effects of stimulation parameters and training-induced neural plasticity on the characteristics of motor neuron recruitment order, contributing to improve mechanistic understanding and effectiveness of epidural stimulation-promoted motor recovery after SCI.

Passive Knee Orthoses Assistance in Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling in an Individual With Spinal Cord Injury

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) may be used in rehabilitation and assistance of people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). One significant application is facilitating physical exercise, mainly when combining FES with mechanical platforms, such as tricycles. However, there are still technical challenges in FES cycling protocols, such as improving control and cycling performance. Here we show how passive elements in knee orthoses during FES cycling could increase the average cadence, taking advantage of the cycling movement. Our approach is twofold. First, we simulated the forward dynamics of a detailed musculoskeletal model with passive elements over the knees. Simulations showed that specific spring stiffness ranges increased the crankset speed during cycling by more than 50%. Using parameters found in simulations, we built a pair of passive orthoses and performed experiments with one individual with SCI. During two days, the volunteer cycled with similar stimulation magnitude with and without the passive elements. We observed that the average crankset speed was higher by more than 10% when the springs were attached to the passive orthoses. These results show the potential of using passive elements to increase cycling speed for FES cycling with similar or even lower stimulation magnitude, leading to longer exercise duration.

Energy Expenditure, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Body Composition Following Arm Cycling or Functional Electrical Stimulation Exercises in Spinal Cord Injury: A 16-Week Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Physical deconditioning and inactivity following spinal cord injury (SCI) are associated with multiple cardiometabolic risks. To mitigate cardiometabolic risk, exercise is recommended, but it is poorly established whether arm cycling exercise (ACE) or functional electrical stimulation (FES) leg cycling yields superior benefits. Objectives: To determine the adaptations of 16 weeks of FES cycling and ACE on exercise energy expenditure (EEE), cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and obesity after SCI. Methods: Thirteen physically untrained individuals were randomly assigned to FES (n = 6) or ACE (n = 7) exercise 5 days/week for 16 weeks. Pre- and post-intervention EEE, peak oxygen consumption (absolute and relative VO2Peak), and work were assessed using indirect calorimetry, while body composition was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Results: Main effects were found for peak power (p < .001), absolute (p = .046) and relative (p = .042) VO2Peak, and peak work (p = .013). Compared to baseline, the ACE group increased in EEE (+85%, p = .002), peak power (+307%, p < .001), VO2Peak (absolute +21%, relative +22%, p ≤ .024), peak work (19% increase, p = .003), and total body fat decreased (-6%, p = .05). The FES group showed a decrease in percentage body fat mass (-5%, p = .008). The ACE group had higher EEE (p = .008), peak power (p < .001), and relative VO2Peak (p = .025) compared to postintervention values in the FES group. Conclusion: In the current study, ACE induced greater increases in EEE and CRF, whereas ACE and FES showed similar results on body fat. Exercise promotional efforts targeting persons with SCI should use both FES and ACE to reduce sedentary behavior and to optimize different health parameters after SCI.

Single session exercises and concurrent functional electrical stimulation are more effective on muscles' force generation than only exercises in spinal cord injured persons: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate impact of first therapy session, containing functional electrical stimulation (FES) and therapeutic exercises (TE) on erector spinae (ES) and rectus abdominis (RA) force generation in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).

METHODS

Five men with SCI were divided in two groups - FES+TE received concurrent FES on ES and RA and TE, TE only TE. Participants performed exercises for improving sitting balance and posture. Muscles' electrical activity was evaluated by electromyography; amplitude (AEMG) and median frequency (MF) were used for analysis.

RESULTS

AEMG of ES left (L) increased 292.9% (g=-0.92), right (R) 175% (g=-1.01), RA L 314.3% (g=-0,81, P<0.05), R 266.7% (g=-0.08) in FES+TE. AEMG of ES L increased 47.6% (g=-0.46), R 96.4% (g=-0.95); RA L 7.1% (g=-0.97), but R decreased 6.7% (g=0.12) in TE. MF of ES L increased 108.5% (g=-0.74), R 184% (g=-1.25); RA L 886.7% (g=3-05, P<0.05), R 817.6% (g=-2.55, P<0.05) in FES+TE. MF of ES L increased 95.2% (g=-1.02), R 161.4% (g=-1.64); RA L 3,2% (g=-0.06), R 30.8% (g=-0.46) in TE.

CONCLUSIONS

In SCI persons, single session exercises and concurrent functional electrical stimulation may be more effective on muscles` force generation than only exercises. However, replication of the results is needed before clinical implementation.

Shoulder Functional Electrical Stimulation During Wheelchair Propulsion in Spinal Cord Injury Subjects

Background: Subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) propel their wheelchairs by generating a different level of muscle activity given their multiple deficits in muscle strength. Exercise training programs seem to be effective in improving wheelchair propulsion capacity. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy is a complementary tool for rehabilitation programs. Objectives: To determine the accuracy of the synchronization between the FES activation and the push phase of the propulsion cycle by using hand pressure sensors that allow anterior deltoids activation when the hand is in contact with the pushrim. Methods: We analyzed 2 subjects, with injuries at C6 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A and T12 AIS A. The stimulation parameters were set for a 30 Hz frequency symmetrical biphasic wave, 300 μs pulse width. Data were collected as participants propelled the wheelchair over a 10-m section of smooth, level vinyl floor. Subjects were evaluated in a motion analysis laboratory (ELITE; BTS, Milan, Italy). Results: Subject 1 showed synchronization between the FES activation and the push phase of 87.5% in the left hand and of 80% in the right hand. Subject 2 showed synchronization of 95.1% in the left and of hand 94.9% in the right hand. Conclusion: Our study determined a high accuracy of a novel FES therapeutic option, showing the synchronization between the electrical stimulation and the push phase of the propulsion cycle.