Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Compared with Clopidogrel in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Antiplatelet Therapy in End-stage Renal Disease Patients on Maintenance Dialysis: a State-of-the-art Review

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on maintenance dialysis have an increased risk of ischaemic events, such as recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Potent antiplatelet therapy may help mitigate this risk. Nonetheless, ERSD patients are also at increased risk of bleeding due to their complex vascular milieu, which limits the routine use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors. Moreover, these patients are often underrepresented or excluded from major clinical trials leaving a significant gap in existing knowledge. Understanding the mechanisms of this paradox may serve as a benchmark for the development of ESRD trials. The present review aims to provide an overview of the pathophysiological nature of increased bleeding and ischaemic risks in ERSD patients as well as summarize available evidence of antiplatelet use and propose new concepts to guide physicians in selecting appropriate drug regimes for this high-risk cohort.

Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel as Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The worldwide prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has significantly increased in the past decades. Scientific reports have shown CKD to be an enhancing risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is the leading cause of premature death in patients with CKD. Clinical practice guidelines are ambiguous in view of the use of antiplatelet drugs in patients with CKD because patients with moderate-to-severe CKD were often excluded from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically assess the adverse cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes that were observed with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel use in patients with CKD and cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

Electronic databases including Web of Science, Google Scholar, http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov , Cochrane database, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were carefully searched for English-based articles comparing ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with CKD. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events were the endpoints in this study. The latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.4) was used to analyze the data. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data post analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 15,664 participants were included in this analysis, whereby 2456 CKD participants were assigned to ticagrelor and 13,208 CKD participants were assigned to clopidogrel. Our current analysis showed that major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71-1.03; P = 0.09), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.57- 1.18; P = 0.29), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.56-1.23; P = 0.35), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.70-1.07; P = 0.19), ischemic stroke (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.58-1.11; P = 0.18), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.38-2.99; P = 0.91) were not significantly different in CKD patients who were treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI)-defined minor (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52-1.53; P = 0.68) and TIMI major bleeding (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.69-1.76; P = 0.67) were also not significantly different. However, bleeding defined according to the academic research consortium (BARC) bleeding type 1 or 2 (RR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.13-3.37; P = 0.02) and BARC bleeding type 3 or 5 (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.17-2.48; P = 0.006) were significantly higher with ticagrelor.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with clopidogrel, even though ticagrelor was not associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in these patients with CKD, it was associated with significantly higher BARC bleeding. Therefore, the safety outcomes of ticagrelor still require further evaluation in patients with CKD. Nevertheless, this hypothesis should only be confirmed with more powerful results that could usually only be achieved using large-scale randomized trials.

The impact of end-stage kidney disease on mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction: A nationwide study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on mortality in patients with first-time acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

This was a retrospective nationwide cohort study. Patients diagnosed with first-time AMI between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, were included. All patients were followed-up until death or December 31, 2012, whichever occurred first. A one-to-one propensity score matching technique was used to match patients with ESKD to those without ESKD of similar sex, age, comorbidities, and coronary intervention (including percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] and coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]). Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves were constructed to compare AMI patients with and without ESKD.

RESULTS

A total of 186 112 patients were enrolled and 8056 patients with ESKD were identified. Propensity score matched 8056 patients without ESKD were included in the comparison. Overall, the 12-year mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with ESKD than in those without ESKD (log-rank p < 0.0001), including the sex, age, and PCI and CABG subgroups. In Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis, ESKD was an independent risk factor for mortality after patients suffered from first-time AMI (hazard ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.70-1.84; p < 0.0001). A forest plot for subgroup analysis revealed that in AMI patients, ESKD had a higher impact on mortality in male; younger age; without comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; and receiving PCI and CABG subgroups.

CONCLUSION

ESKD significantly increases the mortality risk in patients with first-time AMI, including both sexes, different ages, and whether PCI or CABG was performed. In patients with AMI, ESKD has a high impact on mortality in male, younger age, without comorbidities, and those undergoing PCI and CABG.

Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Dialysis Patients with Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: The optimal antiplatelet therapy for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on chronic dialysis presenting with acute or chronic coronary syndromes (ACS or CCS) remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety endpoints of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in ESKD patients requiring dialysis and presenting with ACS or CCS. (2) Methods: Studies were included comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel in ESKD patients on chronic dialysis with ACS or CCS. The primary composite efficacy outcome was a combination of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization, and ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The primary safety outcome was major and non-major bleeding events. (3) Results: Five observational studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in the primary composite efficacy outcome between ticagrelor and clopidogrel (p = 0.40). Similarly, the 2 groups had no significant differences in all-cause mortality (p = 0.82) or cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.79). Ticagrelor did not show a significantly different risk of coronary revascularization (p = 0.35) or recurrent myocardial infarction (p = 0.41) compared to clopidogrel. Also, the risk of stroke was similar (p = 0.21). The 2 groups had no significant difference in the primary composite safety outcome (p = 0.22) or major bleeding events (p = 0.27). (4) Conclusions: In ESKD patients on chronic dialysis with ACS or CCS, there was no significant difference in efficacy or safety outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the optimal antiplatelet therapy in this population.

Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and on Dialysis: A Meta-Analysis

This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and undergoing dialysis. This study was conducted per the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was performed using electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies comparing clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing dialysis. To ensure the inclusion of all relevant articles, a combination of the following keywords, along with medical subject heading (MeSH) terms, was used: "clopidogrel," "ticagrelor," "acute coronary syndrome," and "dialysis." The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which consisted of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The occurrence of any bleeding events (including major and nonmajor bleeding events) and major bleeding events was chosen as the safety endpoints. A total of four studies were included in the pooled analysis. The pooled sample size was 5,417 patients, including 892 in the ticagrelor group and 4525 in the clopidogrel group. The findings indicate that ticagrelor, compared to clopidogrel, is associated with a significantly higher risk of MACEs, all-cause death, and major bleeding events. The findings suggest that clopidogrel may be a better choice for individuals with ACS undergoing dialysis due to its lower risk of MACE, all-cause death, and major bleeding events compared to ticagrelor.

Ticagrelor inhibits platelet aggregation and reduces inflammatory burden more than clopidogrel in patients with stages 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

No study has compared pharmacologic properties of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in non-dialysis patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind RCT to compare effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in 48 CKD, with the primary outcome of ADP-induced platelet aggregation (WBPA) after 2 weeks of DAPT. In a parallel arm, we compared effects of 2 weeks of ticagrelor plus aspirin on mean changes in WBPA and markers of thromboinflammation among non-CKD controls (n = 26) with that of CKD in the ticagrelor-arm.

RESULTS

Average age of CKD was 53.7 years, with 62% women, 54% African American, and 42% with stage 5 CKD. Ticagrelor generated statistically lower WBPA values post treatment [median 0 Ω (IQR 0, 2)] vs. clopidogrel [median 0 Ω (IQR 0, 5)] (P = 0.002); percent inhibition of WBPA was greater (87 ± 22% vs. 63 ± 50%; P = 0.04; and plasma IL-6 levels were much lower (8.42 ± 1.73 pg/ml vs. 18.48 ± 26.56 pg/ml; P = 0.04). No differences in mean changes in WBPA between CKD-ticagrelor and control groups were observed. Ticagrelor- DAPT reduced levels of IL-1α and IL-1β in CKD-ticagrelor and control groups, attenuated lowering of TNFα and TRAIL levels in CKD-ticagrelor (vs controls), and had global changes in correlation between various cytokines in a subgroup of CKD-ticagrelor subjects not on statins (n = 10). Peak/trough levels of ticagrelor/metabolite were not different between CKD-ticagrelor and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We report significant differences in platelet aggregation and anti-inflammatory properties between ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-based DAPT in non-dialysis people with stage 4-5 CKD. These notable inflammatory responses suggest ticagrelor-based DAPT might lower inflammatory burden of asymptomatic patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD. (clinicaltrials.gov # NCT03649711).

Patients with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis benefit from percutaneous coronary intervention after non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment significantly improves outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It remains unclear whether the benefits of PCI exist in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The present study was designed to investigate the effects of PCI on the short- and long-term prognosis of patients with ESRD and NSTEMI. We conducted a retrospective study from 1 January 2015 to 1 January 2020, which includes 148 consecutive patients with ESRD and NSTEMI. All patients were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 mL/min/1.73 m² and had received regular hemodialysis treatment before hospitalization. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify independent predictors of 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In this study, 62 patients received PCI treatment. Univariable logistic regression analysis showed that PCI treatment was associated with the trend of reduction in the risk of in-hospital mortality (11.3% vs 43%, P = 0.022), but was not independently related to lower in-hospital mortality risk after multivariable logistic regression analysis (P = 0.131). After a 1-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that MACE rate was significantly lower in patients with ESRD and NSTEMI who had received PCI treatment during hospitalization (P < 0.001). After multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, no PCI treatment was independently associated with 1-year MACE (hazard ratios 3.217, 95% CI 2.03-8.489, P = 0.003). PCI treatment during hospitalization is associated with reduced 1-year MACE in patients with ESRD and NSTEMI, which suggests that more aggressive therapies may be beneficial for this special higher risk population.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients on Chronic Dialysis

Introduction

Although oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (P2Y12-Is) are one of the most commonly prescribed medication classes in patients with end stage kidney disease on dialysis (ESKD), scarce data exist regarding their benefits and risks.

Methods

We compared effectiveness and safety of clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor in a longitudinal study using the United States Renal Data System registry of Medicare beneficiaries with ESKD. Individuals who filled new P2Y12-I prescriptions between 2011 and 2015 were included and followed until death or censoring. The primary exposure variable was P2Y12-I assignment. The primary outcome variable was death. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular (CV) death, coronary revascularization, and gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage. Survival analyses were performed after propensity matching.

Results

Of 44,619 patients with ESKD who received P2Y12-Is, 95% received clopidogrel (n = 42,523), 3% prasugrel (n = 1205), and 2% ticagrelor (n = 891). To balance baseline differences, propensity-matching was performed: 1:6 for prasugrel (n = 1189) versus clopidogrel (n = 7134); 1:4 for ticagrelor (n = 880) versus clopidogrel (n = 3520); and 1:1 for ticagrelor versus prasugrel (n = 880). Prasugrel was associated with a reduced risk for death versus clopidogrel and ticagrelor (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.73–0.93 and 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64–0.95). Compared with clopidogrel, prasugrel reduced risk for coronary revascularization (HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.86–0.96). There were no differences in GI hemorrhage between P2Y12-Is.

Conclusion

In patients with ESKD, prasugrel compared with others reduced risk of death possibly by reducing risk for coronary revascularizations and without worsening gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Future trials are imperative to compare efficacy and safety of P2Y12-Is in patients with ESKD.

Comparative efficacy and safety of oral P2Y12 inhibitors for patients with chronic kidney disease and acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is a paucity of data concerning the safety and effectiveness of P2Y₁₂ inhibitors in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. The aim of this study is to compare the different oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors in terms of efficacy and safety, focusing exclusively on patients with CKD who were treated for ACS.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and Web of Science to identify studies that compared different oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) in patients with ACS with CKD. Efficacy outcomes included the major adverse cardiovascular events composite outcome and safety outcomes included major bleedings and major or minor bleedings combined. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included in the systematic review, 7 CKD subgroup analyses of RCTs (8878 patients) and 5 observational studies (20175 patients). After the exclusion of studies with conservative management, prasugrel resulted in significant primary endpoint reduction versus clopidogrel (HR 0.80 and 95% CI 0.64 - 0.99), while ticagrelor did not (HR 0.88 and 95% CI 0.73 - 1.06). Major bleedings did not differ between the interventions. Ticagrelor resulted in more major or minor bleedings than clopidogrel (HR 1.21 and 95% CI 1.06 - 1.38), whereas prasugrel did not (HR 1.12 and 95% CI 0.84 - 1.49).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACS with underlying CKD, who are intended to receive invasive management, there may be a significant reduction of the primary efficacy outcome with prasugrel as compared to clopidogrel but not with ticagrelor as compared to clopidogrel. There probably exists no difference among interventions in the major bleedings. Dedicated RCTs are needed to confirm these results.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome and on dialysis in Taiwan

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with renal dysfunction.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients on chronic dialysis and whose admission diagnosis between 1 July 2013 and 31 December 2016 included ACS. The primary effectiveness endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and the primary safety endpoint was a major bleeding event. The application of propensity scores through the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to the study groups. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (aHRs) of study endpoints. In addition, the competing risk was adjusted using the Fine and Gray competing risk model.

RESULTS

There were 1915 patients in the clopidogrel group and 270 patients in the ticagrelor group. At 12 months, the ticagrelor group had higher risks for MACE (aHR with IPTW: 1.29; 95% CI 1.16-1.44); death (aHR with IPTW: 1.65; 95% CI 1.47-1.86) and cardiac death (subdistribution HR [SHR] with IPTW: 1.64; 95% CI 1.41-1.91), compared with those in the clopidogrel group. For major bleeding event, the risk was significantly higher with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel (SHR with IPTW: 1.49; 95% CI 1.34-1.65). In terms of the risk for any bleeding event, there was no significant difference between the two groups (SHR with IPTW: 1.05; 95% CI 0.95-1.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with higher MACE, death, cardiac death and major bleeding risk within 12 months in patients with ACS and on dialysis.

A risk score model to predict in-hospital mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease and acute myocardial infarction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) significantly increases the rate of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. In this study, we aimed to establish a risk score (RS) model to predict in-hospital mortality risk in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A total of 113 consecutive patients with ESRD and AMI were retrospectively enrolled between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. All patients received regular hemodialysis and were divided into two groups according to the prognosis during hospitalization. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors of in-hospital mortality. A RS model was developed based on multiple regression analysis and was internally validated using 1000 bootstrap analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed, and the area under curve (AUC) was analyzed to evaluate the performance of the RS model. AUCs were compared using the Z test. Thirty-three patients died during hospitalization, resulting in in-hospital mortality rate of 29.2%. After multivariate logistic regression, an RS model (0-8) was established based on five independent factors that were assigned with different points according to relative coefficients (coefficient of the index risk factor divided by the lowest coefficient among these five risk factors; rounded to closest integer): 1 for C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 14.2 mg/L and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ V3%; 2 for age ≥ 65 years old, heart rate (HR) at admission ≥ 86 beats per minute (bpm) and D-dimer ≥ 2.4 mg/L FEU. The present RS model had a sensitivity of 85.7%, the specificity of 84%, and an accuracy of 78.1%. In ROC curve analysis, the model demonstrated a good discriminate power in predicting in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.895, 95% CI 0.814-0.96; P < 0.001), which was significantly better than the predictive power of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score (GRACE RS) (AUC = 0.754, 95% CI 0.641-0.868; P < 0.001 after Z test). A novel RS model, which was established to help predict in-hospital mortality of patients with ESRD and AMI, was easy to use and had higher accuracy than the GRACE RS.

Risk of bradyarrhythmia related to ticagrelor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Ticagrelor was related to bradycardia in DISPERSE-II trial. This risk has been integrated into the European risk-management plan, and its use is warned in at-risk patients. Nevertheless, this risk was not systematically assessed nor measured.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the risk of bradyarrhythmia associated with ticagrelor.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA-SOURCE

MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI web of Science, clinicaltrial.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies in patients treated with ticagrelor or comparator(s).

META-ANALYSIS

Risk of bias in each RCT was assessed using Cochrane tool. Relative Risks (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) were calculated for each RCT, and pooled using fixed-effect or random-effects models, when appropriate. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. A potential publication bias was searched.

RESULTS

Among 82 eligible studies, event data were missing for 56 studies, due to detected reporting bias (i.e. inability to confirm zero events). Fifteen RCTs were selected and the combined RR of bradyarrhythmia was 1.15 (95 %CI 1.05-1.26), and 1.29 (1.02-1.65) for severe bradyarrhythmia. The risk appeared to be dose dependent. Restricting the analysis only to RCTs performed in patients without previous bradyarrhythmia resulted in a non-increased risk.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirmed the risk of bradyarrhythmia or severe bradyarrhythmia related to ticagrelor, and its use in patients without previous bradycardia was effective in preventing it. The evidence coming from this meta-analysis was low to moderate due to missing outcome in 2/3 of eligible studies. Waiting for access to these data, the use of ticagrelor in patients with risk factors of bradycardias should be avoided.

2020 Focused Update of the 2012 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

One of the major missions of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology is to publish practice guidelines that are suitable for local use in Taiwan. The ultimate purpose is to continuously improve cardiovascular health care from the implementation of the recommendations in the guidelines. Despite recent improvement of medical care, patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) still carry a high morbidity and mortality. There have been many changes in the concepts of STEMI diagnosis and treatment in recent years. The 2020 focused update of the 2012 guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the management of STEMI is an amendment of the 2012 guidelines based on the newest published scientific data. The recommendations in this focused update provide the diagnosis and treatment strategy for STEMI that should be generally implemented in Taiwan. Nevertheless, guidelines never completely replace clinical judgment and medical decision still should be determined individually.