Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation or Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Renal Impairment: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis

The Crosstalk between Nephropathy and Coagulation Disorder: Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Dilemmas

ABSTRACT

The interaction between the kidney and the coagulation system greatly affects each other because of the abundant vessel distribution and blood perfusion in the kidney. Clinically, the risks of complicated thrombosis and bleeding have become important concerns in the treatment of nephropathies, especially nephrotic syndrome, CKD, ESKD, and patients with nephropathy undergoing RRTs. Adverse effects of anticoagulant or procoagulant therapies in patients with nephropathy, especially anticoagulation-related nephropathy, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and bleeding, seriously worsen the prognosis of patients, which have become challenges for clinicians. Over the decades, the interaction between the kidney and the coagulation system has been widely studied. However, the effects of the kidney on the coagulation system have not been systematically investigated. Although some coagulation-related proteins and signaling pathways have been shown to improve coagulation abnormalities while avoiding additional kidney damage in certain kidney diseases, their potential as anticoagulation targets in nephropathy requires further investigation. Here, we review the progression of research on the crosstalk between the coagulation system and kidney diseases and systematically analyze the significance and shortcomings of previous studies to provide new sight into future research. In addition, we highlight the status of clinical treatment for coagulation disorder and nephropathy caused by each other, indicating guidance for the formulation of therapeutic strategies or drug development.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with prior gastrointestinal bleeding: a network meta-analysis of real-world data

PURPOSE

The objective of present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of resuming direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and prior gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception until 2 June 2021 for observational cohort studies in patients with AF, who resumed VKAs or DOACs after a history of GIB. Studies that reported data on clinical outcomes including risk of recurrent GIB, thromboembolic events, or all-cause mortality were included. A network meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and associated 95% credible intervals (CIs), using a random effects model in a Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies were included in the final analysis, including 59,244 AF patients with prior GIB, of whom 27,793 resumed DOACs, 24,635 resumed warfarin, and 6816 did not resume anticoagulation. Compared with no resumption of anticoagulation, resumption of warfarin was associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB (HR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06-1.70), but no increased risk of recurrent GIB was found with resumption of DOACs (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.88-1.71); among individual DOACs, only rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.16-2.65). Compared with no resumption of anticoagulation, resumption of DOACs and warfarin was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.40-0.84; HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44-0.79), but no statistically significant reduction in thromboembolic events (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.4-1.2; HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.55-1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In AF patients with prior GIB, resumption of DOACs may be safer, except for rivaroxaban.

Comparative efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in the patients with different renal functions: a systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and different renal functions.

DESIGN

Systematic review containing pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

RCTs reporting the efficacy and safety outcomes of DOACs in different creatinine clearance (CrCl) subgroups.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken by two independent reviewers. Data were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird method in pairwise meta-analysis. Network meta-analysis within a Bayesian framework was conducted.

RESULTS

Data from 10 RCTs were included. In the treatment of acute VTE, DOACs did not significantly reduce recurrent VTE or VTE-related death (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.11) but significantly reduced bleeding events (0.76, 0.68 to 0.90) compared with warfarin. In the extended treatment of VTE, DOACs produced significant benefits in recurrent VTE or VTE-related death (0.23, 0.16 to 0.29), but significantly increased bleeding events (1.86, 1.04 to 3.33) compared with placebo/aspirin. There were no significant differences in efficacy and safety of DOACs among the three CrCl stratified subgroups in acute and extended treatment of VTE (p for subgroup heterogeneity >0.1). Bayesian network meta-analysis suggested that apixaban 2.5 mg and 5 mg two times per day were associated with a lower risk of bleeding than dabigatran, rivaroxaban, warfarin and aspirin in the subgroup with CrCl >80 mL/min.

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of acute VTE, DOACs are similar to warfarin in reducing recurrent VTE and VTE-related death but are significantly superior to warfarin in reducing the risk of bleeding. For the efficacy and safety of DOACs across different CrCl stratifications (30-50, 50-80 and more than 80 mL/min), no significant difference was found. In light of minimal evidence, apixaban might be associated with a lower risk of bleeding in patients with VTE and CrCl >80 mL/min.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018090896.