Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Obesity and Polypharmacy

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Obese Patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) with Atrial Fibrillation or Venous Thromboembolism: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Real-world data show limited utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) due to concerns regarding their efficacy and safety in this demographic. Aim: This review aimed to consolidate current evidence on the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in obese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE). The primary efficacy outcome assessed a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, systemic embolism (SE), and myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases from inception to December 28, 2023. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: A total of 35 studies involving 434,320 participants were analyzed. DOAC use was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of the composite outcome (RR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.65, 0.98], I2 = 95%), hemorrhagic stroke (RR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.38, 0.88], I2 = 92%), major bleeding (RR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.63, 0.92], I2 = 94%), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.49, 0.72], I2 = 88%), and intracranial bleeding (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.34, 0.60], I2 = 44%) compared to warfarin. A non-significant benefit of DOACs was observed for all-cause mortality, MI, the composite of stroke or SE, ischemic stroke, SE, VTE, and minor bleeding compared to warfarin. Subgroup analysis indicated no significant effect modification based on the indication for anticoagulation or study design. Conclusions: DOACs demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in obese individuals compared to warfarin.

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in comparison to warfarin in obese patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aim

Obesity affects nearly 650 million adults worldwide, and the prevalence is steadily rising. This condition has significant adverse effects on cardiovascular health, increasing the risk of hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (AF). While anticoagulation for obese patients with AF is a well-established therapy for the prevention of thromboembolism, the safety and efficacy of different anticoagulants in this specific population are not well explored. This meta-analysis aimed to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) to vitamin K antagonists in obese populations with AF.

Methods

The PRISMA guidelines were followed for this meta-analysis, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023392711). PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched for relevant articles from inception through January 2023. Two independent authors screened titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review in Covidence. Data were extracted in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using RevMan v5.4 using odds ratio as an effect measure.

Results

Two thousand two hundred fifty-nine studies were identified from the database search, and 18 were included in the analysis. There were statistically significant reductions in the odds of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in the DOAC group compared with the VKA group (OR 0.70, CI 0.66-0.75) and (OR 0.47, CI 0.35-0.62), respectively. In addition, the DOAC group exhibited lower odds of systemic embolism (OR 0.67, CI 0.54-0.83), major bleeding (OR 0.62, CI 0.54-0.72), and composite outcome (OR 0.72, CI 0.63-0.81).

Conclusion

Based on the findings from this meta-analysis, DOACs demonstrate superior safety and efficacy in obese patients with AF compared with VKAs. These results may have significant implications for guiding anticoagulation strategies in this patient population.

Comparing the Clinical Outcomes Observed with Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for the Management of Obese Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an irregular heart rhythm which is becoming more and more common in this new era. Obesity is a risk factor for cardiovascular events, and obese patients are more at risk for stroke. The Framingham Heart Study demonstrated an increase in the developmental risk of AF by 4% for every unit (kg/m2) increase in body mass index (BMI). An anticoagulant is often required for the management of such patients. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the clinical outcomes which were associated with rivaroxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of obese patients with non-valvular AF.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov , Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central were the searched databases. Clinical outcomes including stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding were the endpoints. In this study, dichotomous data were analyzed by the RevMan software version 5.4. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for result interpretation.

RESULTS

Ten studies consisting of a total number of 168,081 obese participants were included whereby 81,332 participants were treated with rivaroxaban and 86,749 participants were treated with warfarin. The risks of ischemic (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.84; P = 0.00001) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76; P = 0.0001) as well as systemic embolism (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.87; P = 0.0004) were significantly lower with rivaroxaban compared to warfarin for the management of these obese patients with non-valvular AF. Rivaroxaban was also associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.87; P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Based on this analysis, rivaroxaban seemed to be a better option in comparison to warfarin, due to its association with significantly lower risks of stroke and bleeding outcomes in obese patients with non-valvular AF. However, this hypothesis should further be confirmed in larger clinical trials.

The Impact of Polypharmacy on the Effectiveness and Safety of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

 Polypharmacy may affect outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) due to interactions or reduced adherence, but comparative data are lacking. Therefore, the impact of polypharmacy on AF-related outcomes and benefit-risk profiles of NOACs in patients with polypharmacy were investigated.

METHODS

 AF patients initiating anticoagulation between 2013 and 2019 were included using Belgian nationwide data. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox regression was used to investigate outcomes.

RESULTS

 Among 254,478 AF patients, 167,847 (66.0%) used ≥5 drugs. Polypharmacy was associated with higher stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.15), all-cause mortality (aHR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.40-1.50), and major bleeding risks (aHR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.23-1.35). Among patients with polypharmacy, NOACs were associated with lower stroke/SE (aHR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.73), all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77-0.84), major bleeding (aHR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97), and intracranial bleeding risks (aHR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69-0.85), but higher gastrointestinal bleeding risks (aHR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.19) compared to VKAs. Major bleeding risks were lower with apixaban (aHR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.85), but nonsignificantly different with other NOACs compared to VKAs. Lower major bleeding risks were observed with dabigatran (aHR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97) and apixaban (aHR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.73-0.81) compared to rivaroxaban, and with apixaban compared to dabigatran (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.90) and edoxaban (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.70-0.85).

CONCLUSION

 Polypharmacy was associated with increased thromboembolic, bleeding, and mortality risks in AF patients. NOACs had better benefit-risk profiles than VKAs in patients with polypharmacy.

Effect of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Polypharmacy: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

 The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with polypharmacy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

 Randomized controlled trials or observational studies reporting the data of NOACs versus VKAs among AF patients with polypharmacy were included. The search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases up to November 2022. A total of 12 studies involving 767,544 AF patients were included. For the primary outcomes, the use of NOACs compared with VKAs was significantly associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism in AF patients with moderate polypharmacy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.86]) and severe polypharmacy (HR: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.69-0.82]), but there was no significant difference in major bleeding (moderate polypharmacy: HR: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.74-1.01]; severe polypharmacy: HR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.79-1.06]) between the two groups. In secondary outcomes, there were no differences in the rates of ischemic stroke, all-cause death, and gastrointestinal bleeding between the NOAC- and VKA- users, but NOAC users had a reduced risk of any bleeding compared with VKA- users. Compared with VKAs, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage was reduced in NOAC- users with moderate polypharmacy but not severe polypharmacy.

CONCLUSION

 In patients with AF and polypharmacy, NOACs showed advantages over VKAs in stroke or systemic embolism and any bleeding, and were comparable to VKAs for major bleeding, ischemic stroke, all-cause death, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Obese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac condition characterized by an irregular heart rhythm, which is increasingly prevalent in the modern era. All international guidelines strongly advise the administration of anticoagulants to individuals with AF who are at high risk of stroke. These guidelines recommend the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin because warfarin is significantly associated with increased rates of major bleeding, numerous interactions with food and drugs, and the necessity for frequent monitoring. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients with atrial fibrillation. Two authors independently conducted a comprehensive literature search using electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE from inception to June 1, 2023. The efficacy outcome assessed in this meta-analysis included the composite of stroke and systemic embolism. For safety analysis, major bleeding events were compared among the study groups. Eleven studies fulfilled all the inclusion criteria and were included in the present meta-analysis enrolling 144,502 patients. In this study, DOACs demonstrate superior efficacy in preventing stroke/systemic embolism compared to warfarin. Among the DOACs, apixaban emerged as the most effective, followed by rivaroxaban, warfarin, and dabigatran. In terms of safety, apixaban was also found to be the most favorable treatment option, followed by rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and warfarin. In summary, our study concludes that apixaban exhibited greater effectiveness and safety when compared to other DOACs and warfarin in obese patients with AF.

Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Regimens of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Morbidly Obese Patients: An Updated Literature Review

Data on the impact of morbid obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m²) on the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are relatively limited, making it difficult to design optimal dosing regimens in morbidly obese patients.To review literature on PK/PD profile, efficacy, and safety of DOACs in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with morbid obesity and make recommendations regarding optimal dosing regimens in these patient populations.A detailed literature search was conducted (from inception to June 22, 2022) for relevant articles involving PK/PD and clinical data on DOACs use in morbidly obese patients with VTE or AF, or healthy volunteers.A total of 28 studies were identified. DOAC-specific PK variations and clinical outcomes have been observed. Obesity may have a modest effect on PK/PD of dabigatran, apixaban, or rivaroxaban. Dabigatran was effective in AF patients with morbid obesity but might increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Standard dosing of apixaban or rivaroxaban is effective and safe for VTE and AF patients with morbid obesity. Trough edoxaban concentration and anti-Xa activity were similar in different BMI groups (18.5 to >40 kg/m²), and standard dosing of edoxaban may be effective and safe for AF patients.Current evidence suggests dabigatran should be used with caution in patients with AF as it might increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding; Standard dosing of apixaban or rivaroxaban can be used in VTE or AF patients; Standard dosing of edoxaban may be considered in AF patients.

Dilemmas Related to Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant Administration in Patients With Extreme Obesity

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to discuss the controversies surrounding the use and dosing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients recognizing the limitations of the existing evidence base that preclude strong recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of MEDLINE was performed (2020 to end August 2022) subsequent to recent guidelines using the following search terms: direct acting anticoagulants, obesity, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, dabigatran etexilate, and clinical practice guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA ABSTRACTION

English-language studies and those conducted in adults were selected.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The available randomized studies evaluating DOACs had relatively small numbers of patients with more extreme forms of obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 40 kg/m²) and none of the larger studies had a specific focus on dosing DOACs in obese patients. Recent guidelines by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) have specific recommendations for dosing DOACs in obesity. There are pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and observational studies published before and after the ISTH guidelines with a focus on DOAC dosing in obese patients that generally support the recommendations in the guidelines, but most involved small numbers of patients usually with BMIs <45 kg/m².

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review discusses DOAC dosing in obesity with important considerations for clinicians related to DOAC choice and dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Dosing alterations of DOACs do not appear to be necessary when used for either prophylaxis or treatment in patients with BMIs up to approximately 45 to 50 kg/m², but research is needed for BMIs >50 kg/m².