1
|
Cheema ZM, Gomez LC, Johnson N, Laflamme OD, Rabin HR, Steele K, Leong J, Cheng SY, Quon BS, Stephenson AL, Wranik WD, Sadatsafavi M, Stanojevic S. Measuring the burden of cystic fibrosis: A scoping review. J Cyst Fibros 2023:S1569-1993(23)01722-8. [PMID: 38044160 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2023.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cystic fibrosis (CF) contributes a significant economic burden on individuals, healthcare systems, and society. Understanding the economic impact of CF is crucial for planning resource allocation. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of literature published between 1990 and 2022 that reported the cost of illness, and/or economic burden of CF. Costs were adjusted for inflation and reported as United States dollars. RESULTS A total of 39 studies were included. Direct healthcare costs (e.g., medications, inpatient and outpatient care) were the most frequently reported. Most studies estimated the cost of CF using a prevalence-based (n = 18, 46.2 %), bottom-up approach (n = 23, 59 %). Direct non-healthcare costs and indirect costs were seldom included. The most frequently reported direct cost components were medications (n = 34, 87.2 %), inpatient care (n = 33, 84.6 %), and outpatient care (n = 31, 79.5 %). Twenty-eight percent (n = 11) of studies reported the burden of CF from all three perspectives (healthcare system (payer), individual, and society). Indirect costs of CF were reported in approximately 20 % of studies (n = 8). The reported total cost of CF varied widely, ranging from $451 to $160,000 per person per year (2022 US$). The total cost depended on the number of domains and perspectives included in each study. CONCLUSIONS Most studies only reported costs to the healthcare system (i.e., hospitalizations and healthcare encounters) which likely underestimates the total costs of CF. The wide range of costs reported highlights the importance of standardizing perspectives, domains and costs when estimating the economic burden of CF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zain M Cheema
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Cystic Fibrosis Canada, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lilian C Gomez
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Noah Johnson
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Olivier D Laflamme
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Harvey R Rabin
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine at the University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Jeanette Leong
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine at the University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Bradley S Quon
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Anne L Stephenson
- Division of Respirology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - W Dominika Wranik
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada; Department of Public and International Affairs, Faculty of Management, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
- Respiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sanja Stanojevic
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meinert E, Eerens J, Banks C, Maloney S, Rivers G, Ilic D, Walsh K, Majeed A, Car J. Exploring the Cost of eLearning in Health Professions Education: Scoping Review. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 7:e13681. [PMID: 33704073 PMCID: PMC8081275 DOI: 10.2196/13681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing research on the costs associated with the design and deployment of eLearning in health professions education is limited. The relative costs of these learning platforms to those of face-to-face learning are also not well understood. The lack of predefined costing models used for eLearning cost data capture has made it difficult to complete cost evaluation. OBJECTIVE The key aim of this scoping review was to explore the state of evidence concerning cost capture within eLearning in health professions education. The review explores the available data to define cost calculations related to eLearning. METHODS The scoping review was performed using a search strategy with Medical Subject Heading terms and related keywords centered on eLearning and cost calculation with a population scope of health professionals in all countries. The search was limited to articles published in English. No restriction was placed on literature publication date. RESULTS In total, 7344 articles were returned from the original search of the literature. Of these, 232 were relevant to associated keywords or abstract references following screening. Full-text review resulted in 168 studies being excluded. Of these, 61 studies were excluded because they were unrelated to eLearning and focused on general education. In addition, 103 studies were excluded because of lack of detailed information regarding costs; these studies referred to cost in ways either indicating cost favorability or unfavorability, but without data to support findings. Finally, 4 studies were excluded because of limited cost data that were insufficient for analysis. In total, 42 studies provided data and analysis of the impact of cost and value in health professions education. The most common data source was total cost of training (n=29). Other sources included cost per learner, referring to the cost for individual students (n=13). The population most frequently cited was medical students (n=15), although 12 articles focused on multiple populations. A further 22 studies provide details of costing approaches for the production and delivery of eLearning. These studies offer insight into the ways eLearning has been budgeted and project-managed through implementation. CONCLUSIONS Although cost is a recognized factor in studies detailing eLearning design and implementation, the way cost is captured is inconsistent. Despite a perception that eLearning is more cost-effective than face-to-face instruction, there is not yet sufficient evidence to assert this conclusively. A rigorous, repeatable data capture method is needed, in addition to a means to leverage existing economic evaluation methods that can then test eLearning cost-effectiveness and how to implement eLearning with cost benefits and advantages over traditional instruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Meinert
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Jessie Eerens
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina Banks
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Maloney
- Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - George Rivers
- Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dragan Ilic
- Medical Education Research and Quality, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kieran Walsh
- BMJ Knowledge Centre, BMJ Learning, London, United Kingdom
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Josip Car
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalamara EI, Ballas ET, Pitsiou G, Petrova G. Pulmonary rehabilitation for cystic fibrosis: A narrative review of current literature. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2021; 91. [PMID: 33792230 DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2021.1501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Pulmonary rehabilitation is a key component in cystic fibrosis care. This review summarizes the recent evidence in the area of pulmonary rehabilitation for cystic fibrosis in the form of questions and answers regarding interventions, indications, benefits and risks of pulmonary rehabilitation. Pulmonary rehabilitation includes airway clearance techniques, exercise training, education and behaviour change and can improve patients' exercise capacity, muscle strength, quality of life and nutritional status. Airway clearance techniques have beneficial effects for clearing mucous. Over the past years, evidence for the beneficial effects of exercise training on exercise capacity and overall lung health is growing. In cystic fibrosis, multiple factors result in reduced exercise capacity. All modalities of pulmonary rehabilitation should be offered to patients with cystic fibrosis, as the benefits in most cases outweigh the risks, though the optimal regimens need to be yet defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evgenia I Kalamara
- Respiratory Failure Unit, General Hospital of Thessaloniki "G. Papanikolaou", Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | | | - Georgia Pitsiou
- Respiratory Failure Unit, General Hospital of Thessaloniki "G. Papanikolaou", Thessaloniki; Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Guergana Petrova
- Medical University of Sofia; Pediatric Clinic, University Hospital Alexandrovska, Sofia, Bulgaria.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frey S, Stargardt T, Schneider U, Schreyögg J. The Economic Burden of Cystic Fibrosis in Germany from a Payer Perspective. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2019; 37:1029-1039. [PMID: 30949989 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00797-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder that is most common in white children and young adults. Long-term survival has improved steadily and will likely increase with the recent introduction of neonatal screening and causative treatment. However, these advances have substantial economic consequences for healthcare systems and payers. OBJECTIVE This study aims to determine the economic burden of CF and to elucidate the structure of costs and the distribution of resources for different subpopulations, treatment strategies and sites of care for CF in Germany. METHODS We conducted an observational cohort study to evaluate the economic burden of CF and the costs of treatment within different CF substrata from a payer perspective. Using claims data from a large German sickness fund, we identify the causal effect of CF on costs, service utilisation, and premature mortality. We compare the outcomes of a CF and a control group using entropy balancing and regression techniques, conduct further analyses for the CF group to gain insight into the economic burden associated with different levels of disease severity, and analyse pharmaceutical expenditures by collecting all CF-related expenses on outpatient drug treatment from the sickness fund database. RESULTS Direct medical costs caused by CF in Germany in 2016 average €17,551 per patient-year and appear to be mainly driven by the cost of outpatient drug prescriptions (€12,869). We estimate that the national burden of disease totals €159 million. Costs increase with disease severity and related complications. If all eligible CF patients in the German population were to receive CF mutation-specific drugs, the economic burden of disease would more than triple to €594 million. CONCLUSION CF has a constant and wide-ranging economic impact on payers, with considerable differences in the distribution of costs and service utilisation between younger and older patients as well as mild vs. severe patients. Pharmaceutical expenses will increase in the future as causative treatment gains importance. We encourage the use of a control group approach for burden-of-disease studies to be able to identify causal effects and thus to obtain more precise estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Frey
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Tom Stargardt
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Jonas Schreyögg
- Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meinert E, Alturkistani A, Foley KA, Brindley D, Car J. Examining Cost Measurements in Production and Delivery of Three Case Studies Using E-Learning for Applied Health Sciences: Cross-Case Synthesis. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e13574. [PMID: 31165718 PMCID: PMC6746105 DOI: 10.2196/13574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The World Health Report (2006) by the World Health Organization conveys that a significant increase is needed in global health care resourcing to meet the current and future demand for health professionals. Electronic learning (e-Learning) presents a possible opportunity to change and optimize training by providing a scalable means for instruction, thus reducing the costs for training health professionals and providing patient education. Research literature often suggests that a benefit of e-Learning is its cost-effectiveness compared with face-to-face instruction, yet there is limited evidence with respect to the comparison of design and production costs with other forms of instruction or the establishment of standards pertaining to budgeting for these costs. Objective To determine the potential cost favorability of e-Learning in contrast to other forms of learning, there must first be an understanding of the components and elements for building an e-Learning course. Without first taking this step, studies lack the essential financial accounting rigor for course planning and have an inconsistent basis for comparison. This study aimed to (1) establish standard ingredients for the cost of e-Learning course production and (2) determine the variance instructional design has on the production costs of e-Learning courses. Methods This study made use of a cross-case method among 3 case studies using mixed methods, including horizontal budget variance calculation and qualitative interpretation of responses from course designers for budget variance using total quality management themes. The different implementation-specific aspects of these cases were used to establish common principles in the composition of budgets in the production and delivery of an applied health professional e-Learning course. Results A total of 2 case studies reported significant negative budget variances caused by issues surrounding underreporting of personnel costs, inaccurate resource task estimation, lack of contingency planning, challenges in third-party resource management, and the need to update health-related materials that became outdated during course production. The third study reported a positive budget variance because of the cost efficiency derived from previous implementation, the strong working relationship of the course project team, and the use of iterative project management methods. Conclusions This research suggests that the delivery costs of an e-Learning course could be underestimated or underreported and identifies factors that could be used to better control budgets. Through consistent management of factors affecting the cost of course production, further research could be undertaken using standard economic evaluation methods to evaluate the advantages of using e-Learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Meinert
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Digital Global Health Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Paediatrics, Healthcare Translation Research Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Abrar Alturkistani
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Digital Global Health Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kimberley A Foley
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Digital Global Health Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Brindley
- Department of Paediatrics, Healthcare Translation Research Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Josip Car
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Digital Global Health Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disease caused by variants in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conduction regulator (CFTR) protein. Loss of CFTR function disrupts chloride, bicarbonate and regulation of sodium transport, producing a cascade of mucus obstruction, inflammation, pulmonary infection, and ultimately damage in numerous organs. Established CF therapies treat the downstream consequences of CFTR dysfunction and have led to steady improvements in patient survival. A class of drugs termed CFTR modulators has recently entered the CF therapeutic landscape. These drugs differ fundamentally from prior therapies in that they aim to improve the function of disease-causing CFTR variants. This review summarizes the science behind CFTR modulators, including their targets, mechanism of action, clinical benefit, and future directions in the field. CFTR modulators have dramatically changed how CF is treated, validated CFTR as a therapeutic target, and opened the door to truly personalized therapies and treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Clancy
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder that results in a multi-organ disease with progressive respiratory decline that ultimately leads to premature death. CF is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, which codes for the CFTR anion channel. Established CF treatments target downstream manifestations of the primary genetic defect, including pulmonary and nutritional interventions. Areas covered: CFTR modulators are novel therapies that improve the function of CFTR, and have been approved in the past five years to mitigate the effects of several CF-disease causing mutations. This review summarizes currently approved CFTR modulators and discusses emerging modulator therapies in phase II and III clinical trials described on clinical trials.gov as of April, 2017. Results of relevant trials reported in peer-reviewed journals in Pubmed, scientific conference abstracts and sponsor press releases available as of November, 2017 are included. Expert opinion: The current scope of CF therapeutic development is robust and CFTR modulators have demonstrated significant benefit to patients with specific CFTR mutations. We anticipate that in the future healthcare providers will be faced with a different treatment paradigm, initiating CFTR-directed therapies well before the onset of progressive lung disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin M Hudock
- a Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , OH , USA.,b Division of Pulmonary Biology, Department of Pediatrics , Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| | - John Paul Clancy
- c Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics , Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| |
Collapse
|