Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab (Humira) and the Adalimumab Biosimilar Candidate (HS016) in Chinese Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Phase III Clinical Trial

Dynamics and implications of anti-drug antibodies against adalimumab using ultra-sensitive and highly drug-tolerant assays

Background

Adalimumab induces the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) that may lead to reduced drug concentration and loss-of-response, posing significant clinical challenges. However, traditional immunoassays have limitations in terms of sensitivity and drug-tolerance, hindering the insights of ADA response.

Methods

Herein, we developed an integrated immunoassay platform combining the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay with immunomagnetic separation strategy. A longitudinal cohort study involving 49 patients with ankylosing spondylitis was carried out to analyze the dynamic profiles of ADA and to investigate the impact of ADA on adalimumab pharmacokinetics using a population pharmacokinetic model. Additionally, cross-sectional data from 12 patients were collected to validate the correlation between ADA levels and disease relapse.

Results

The ADA assay demonstrated high sensitivity (0.4 ng/mL) and drug-tolerance (100 μg/mL), while the neutralizing antibodies (NAB) assay showed a sensitivity of 100 ng/mL and drug-tolerance of 20 μg/mL. Analysis of the longitudinal cohort revealed that a majority of patients (44/49, 90%) developed persistent ADA within the first 24 weeks of treatment. ADA levels tended to plateau over time after an initial increase during the early immune response phase. Further, nearly all of the tested patients (26/27, 96%) were classified as NAB positive, with a strong correlation between ADA levels and neutralization capacity (R2 = 0.83, P < 0.001). Population pharmacokinetic modeling revealed a significant positive association between model-estimated individual clearance and observed ADA levels. Higher ADA levels were associated with adalimumab clearance and disease relapse in a cross-sectional cohort, suggesting a promising ADA threshold of 10 for potential clinical application. Moreover, the IgG class was the primary contributor to ADA against adalimumab and the apparent affinity exhibited an increasing trend over time, indicating a T-cell dependent mechanism for ADA elicitation by adalimumab.

Conclusion

In summary, this integrated immunoassay platform shows promise for in-depth analysis of ADA against biologics, offering fresh insights into immunogenicity and its clinical implications.

An Overview of Adalimumab Therapy for Ankylosing Spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease known for causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility in the axial skeleton. Adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for AS.

METHODS

This systematic review involved a comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials related to AS treatment, conducted in major databases such as MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PubMed. The search terms encompassed ankylosing spondylitis, adalimumab, methotrexate, other non-biologic DMARDs, glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, and analgesics. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials with 4,500 participants were included in the review.

RESULTS

The review's results revealed that adalimumab demonstrated notable superiority when compared to a placebo. It effectively reduced disease activity, improved physical function, and lowered inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Adalimumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with adverse events comparable to those observed with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, adalimumab is deemed an effective treatment for AS, showcasing its potential as a first-line therapeutic option. Notably, no significant increase in adverse events was observed compared to placebo. However, the conclusion emphasizes the need for further studies with extended follow-up durations to ascertain the long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab in AS management. This systematic review provides valuable insights supporting the use of adalimumab in the treatment of AS and underscores the importance of ongoing investigations into its long-term effects to optimize its clinical utilization in AS patients.

Predictive values of circulating miR-146a and miR-155 for disease activity and clinical response to TNF-α blocking therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

Ankylosing spondylitis is an insidiously progressive and debilitating form of arthritis involving the axial skeleton. MicroRNAs have been reported to act as candidate biomarkers for ankylosing spondylitis diagnosis and progression. The study aimed to assess the roles of circulating miR-146a and miR-155 in ankylosing spondylitis and their prediction to clinical response to TNF-α blocking therapy.

METHODS

The study included 62 ankylosing spondylitis patients who were given originator TNFi with a 6-month period. Responders to anti-TNF treatment were defined as those reaching the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 (ASAS40) response at the 6-month interval, and nonresponders were defined those not (n = 24).

RESULTS

The ankylosing spondylitis patients at M0 (before beginning TNFi treatment) had higher serum levels of miR-146a and miR-155 than the healthy controls (p < .0001). Lower serum levels of miR-146a and miR-155 were noted in the responders (n = 38) compared with the nonresponders (n = 24) at different time points after anti-TNF treatment (p < .0001). The serum levels of miR-146a and miR-155 alone or in combination used to predict treatment outcomes produced AUCs of 0.884, 0.902, and 0.936, respectively. We submitted the following variables: miR-146a and miR-155 levels, BASDAI, ASDASCRP, ESR (mm/h), and CRP (mg/L) into multivariate logistic regression analysis, and results showed that higher levels of miR-146a (OR: 13.75, 95%CI: 1.32 to 143.57, p = .029), miR-155 (OR: 5.74, 95% CI: 1.63 to 20.20, p = .006), and ESR (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.15, p = .022) were independent baseline predictors of ASAS40 response at 6-month anti-TNF-a treatment.

CONCLUSION

These findings obtained from the study suggest that high serum levels of miR-146a and miR-155 could aid in prediction of poor treatment outcomes after TNF-α blocking therapy.

Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) comprises a spectrum of chronic inflammatory manifestations affecting the axial skeleton and represents a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. Our objective was to generate a set of evidence-based recommendations for the management of axSpA for physicians, health professionals, rheumatologists and policy decision makers in Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) countries. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation-ADOLOPMENT methodology was used to adapt existing recommendations after performing an independent systematic search and synthesis of the literature to update the evidence. A working group consisting of rheumatologists, epidemiologists and patient representatives from countries within the Americas prioritized 13 topics relevant to the context of these countries for the management of axSpA. This Evidence-Based Guideline article reports 13 recommendations addressing therapeutic targets, the use of NSAIDs and glucocorticoids, treatment with DMARDs (including conventional synthetic, biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs), therapeutic failure, optimization of the use of biologic DMARDs, the use of drugs for extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of axSpA, non-pharmacological interventions and the follow-up of patients with axSpA.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab biosimilar (HS016) in inflammatory bowel disease from the real-world study

Objective: Adalimumab (ADA) is an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). The equal effect between the original ADA and biosimilars from Europe and the United States has been shown. However, the biosimilar of ADA is different in China. The effectiveness and safety data of ADA biosimilar (HS016) in China have yet to be discovered. Patients and methods: 91 patients (75 CD, 16 UC) received HS016 treatment and were enrolled in this study. Therapeutic response and safety profiles were analyzed. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was also carried out among nonresponse patients. After being considered as "nonresponse" (after three or 6 months of treatment), 20 patients' serum TNFα concentrations were measured and correlated to their disease severity. Results: Among active CD patients (n = 61), 75.4% (46/61) at 12 w, 73.8% (45/61) at 26 w, 50.8% (31/61) at 52 w achieved the clinical response, respectively; 55.7% (34/61) at 12 w, 65.6% (40/61) at 26 w, and 45.9% (28/61) at 52 w achieved clinical remission. The maintained remission rates of CD (n = 14) in clinical remission were 100% (14/14) at 12 w, 78.6% (11/14) at 26 w, and 63.6% (7/11) at 52 w, respectively. Among active UC patients, 37.5% (6/16) at 12 w and 50% (8/16) at 26 w achieved clinical response. Total adverse event rates were 5.5% (5/91) during 52-week visits. Due to the inadequate serum drug concentration, 30.4% (7/23) of patients had poor clinical responses. Elevations of serum anti-drug antibodies occurred in one additional patient (4.3%). Conclusion: ADA biosimilar HS016 had good efficacy and safety in Chinese IBD patients.

Korean treatment recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis

We aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for treating axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) in Korea. The development committee was constructed, key clinical questions were determined, and the evidence was searched through online databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, KoreaMed, and Kmbase. Systematic literature reviews were conducted, quality of evidence was determined, and draft recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. Recommendations that reached 80% consensus among a voting panel were finalized. Three principles and 21 recommendations were determined. Recommendations 1 and 2 pertain to treatment strategies, regular disease status assessment, and rheumatologist-steered multidisciplinary management. Recommendations 3 and 4 strongly recommend patient education, exercise, and smoking cessation. Recommendations 5-12 address pharmacological treatment of active disease using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, sulfasalazine, biologics, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Recommendations 13-16 address treatment in stable disease. We suggest against spa and acupuncture as therapies (Recommendation 17). Recommendations 18 and 19 pertain to total hip arthroplasty and spinal surgery. Monitoring of comorbidities and drug toxicities are recommended (Recommendations 20 and 21). Recommendations for axSpA treatment in a Korean context were developed based on comprehensive clinical questions and evidence. These are intended to guide best practice in the treatment of axSpA.

Korean treatment recommendations for patients with axial spondyloarthritis

We aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for treating axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) in Korea. The development committee was constructed, key clinical questions were determined, and the evidence was searched through online databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, KoreaMed, and KMbase. Systematic literature reviews were conducted, quality of evidence was determined, and draft recommendations were formulated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. Recommendations that reached 80% consensus among a voting panel were finalized. Three principles and 21 recommendations were determined. Recommendations 1 and 2 pertain to treatment strategies, regular disease status assessment, and rheumatologist-steered multidisciplinary management. Recommendations 3 and 4 strongly recommend patient education, exercise, and smoking cessation. Recommendations 5~12 address pharmacological treatment of active disease using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, sulfasalazine, biologics, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Recommendations 13~16 address treatment in stable disease. We suggest against spa and acupuncture as therapies (Recommendation 17). Recommendations 18 and 19 pertain to total hip arthroplasty and spinal surgery. Monitoring of comorbidities and drug toxicities are recommended (Recommendations 20 and 21). Recommendations for axSpA treatment in a Korean context were developed based on comprehensive clinical questions and evidence. These are intended to guide best practice in the treatment of axSpA.

Efficacy and safety of biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To update the evidence on efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) to inform the 2022 update of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ASAS-EULAR) recommendations for the management of axSpA.

METHODS

Systematic literature review (2016-2021) on efficacy and safety of bDMARDs in axSpA (radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA)/non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA)). Eligible study designs included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), strategy trials and observational studies (the latter only for safety and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations). All relevant efficacy/safety outcomes were included.

RESULTS

In total, 148 publications were included. Efficacy of golimumab and certolizumab was confirmed. Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) biosimilar-originator equivalence was demonstrated. RCT (n=15) data on efficacy of interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) demonstrated clinically relevant effects (risk ratio vs placebo to achieve ASAS40 response 1.3-15.3 (r-axSpA, n=9), 1.4-2.1 (nr-axSpA, n=2)). Efficacy of secukinumab/ixekizumab was demonstrated in TNFi-naïve and TNFi-inadequate responders. IL-23 and IL-12/23 inhibitors (risankizumab/ustekinumab) failed to show relevant benefits. Tapering of TNFi by spacing was non-inferior to standard-dose treatment. The first axSpA treat-to-target trial did not meet its primary endpoint, but showed improvements in secondary outcomes. No new risks were identified with TNFi use in observational studies (data lacking for IL-17i). Secukinumab (n=1) and etanercept (n=2) were associated with increased risk of uveitis in observational studies compared to monoclonal TNFi.

CONCLUSIONS

New evidence supports the efficacy and safety of TNFi (originators/biosimilars) and IL-17i in r-axSpA and nr-axSpA, while IL-23i failed to show relevant effects. Observational studies are needed to confirm long-term IL-17i safety.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021257588.

Spectrum of Spondyloarthritis Among Chinese Populations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to emphasize interesting and important new findings with a focus on the spectrum of spondyloarthritis (SpA) in China.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in the investigation of SpA epidemiology, the exploration of genetic and environmental risk factors, the identification of clinical features, and the updating of treatment protocols in the Chinese population. The prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in China is 0.20-0.42%, and the prevalence of HLA-B27 in AS patients is 88.8-89.4%. HLA-B*2704 is the most common subtype in Chinese AS patients, followed by HLA-B*2705. HLA-A*01, more precisely HLA-A*01:01, may be associated with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and IL-17A inhibitors have been shown to be effective and safe for AS patients in China. Juvenile-onset AS is relatively rare, accounting for only 9.1% of the AS population. The prevalence of arthritis related to inflammatory bowel disease is 6.9 to 7.2%. A Chinese study showed that the most frequently prescribed medication was methotrexate (66.4%). Biological agents were prescribed in only16.4% of patients with PsA. This review summarizes the latest research in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and management of SpA among Chinese populations. Multiple HLA associations with SpA have also been described, and it is hoped that discoveries of such ethnic-specific risk factor(s) and understanding of their pathological mechanisms may potentially lead to newer targeted therapies for the Chinese populations worldwide.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the adalimumab biosimilar TQ-Z2301 and adalimumab for the treatment of Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical equivalence of TQ-Z2301, a biosimilar of adalimumab, to the reference adalimumab in the treatment of Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled phase III clinical trial was conducted in 19 centers across China. Chinese adults with active ankylosing spondylitis despite being treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for ≥ 4 weeks were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to subcutaneously receive 40 mg of TQ-Z2301 or adalimumab every other week for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who achieved at least 20% improvement according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria (ASAS20) at week 24. The equivalence was established if the 90% CI for RR of ASAS20 between two groups at week 24 fell within (0.80, 1.25). Secondary endpoints included efficacy measures of disease activity, spinal mobility, physical function and quality of life, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Safety analysis was done for all patients who received at least one study drug.

RESULTS

A total of 380 patients were enrolled in the study between September 2018 and October 2019, including 188 in the TQ-Z2301 group and 192 in the adalimumab group. In the full analysis population, the ASAS20 response rate at week 24 was 86.70% in the TQ-Z2301 group, and 80.73% in the adalimumab group, the RR of ASAS20 for TQ-Z2301 versus adalimumab was 1.074, 90% CI (0.997, 1.157), fell within the predefined equivalence boundary (0.80, 1.25). Except for the SF-36 at week 12, there was no statistical difference between the two groups for all the secondary endpoints (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse events group was 82.45% in the TQ-Z2301, and 83.85% in the adalimumab group, the safety profile of the two groups was similar. The profiles of immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics were also similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TQ-Z2301 is equivalent to adalimumab for the treatment of Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. The safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic characteristics of both drugs are similar.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study (CTR20181863) was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 19 October 2018. Key Points • TQ-Z2301 showed the equivalence of efficacy compared with the reference adalimumab for the treatment of Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. • The safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics profiles of TQZ-2301 were similar to those of the reference adalimumab.

Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies in China: A patent review

Biosimilars play an important role in reducing the burden on patients and increasing the market competition. Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies are currently one of the hotspots of research and development in China with policies support. With the continuous improvement of policies, the enthusiasm for the research and development of biosimilars has increased year by year. The policy requirements in different periods have different degrees of impact on the patent applications of pharmaceutical companies. This review introduces the biosimilar monoclonal antibodies market status and approval process in China, analyzes the patents in this field, and helps pharmaceutical companies protect their intellectual property rights.

Blood HDAC4 Variation Links With Disease Activity and Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor and Regulates CD4+ T Cell Differentiation in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Purpose

Histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) regulates the progression of autoimmune diseases. This study aimed to further investigate the correlation between HDAC4 and Th cells, inflammation, disease activity, and treatment response in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods

A total of 132 active patients with AS were enrolled, of whom 54 patients received TNF inhibitor (TNFi) and 78 patients received NSAID. Serum HDAC4 was measured by ELISA in patients with AS before treatment (W0) and at week (W)4, W8, and W12 after treatment. Meanwhile, serum HDAC4 was detected in 30 patients with osteoarthritis and in 30 healthy controls (HCs) by ELISA. Besides, naïve CD4⁺ T cells from patients with AS were isolated, followed by modulation of HDAC4 and then polarization toward Th1, Th2, and Th17.

Results

Histone deacetylase 4 was reduced in patients with AS compared with HCs and patients with osteoarthritis (both P < 0.01). In patients with AS, HDAC4 was negatively correlated with TNF (P < 0.001), IL-1β (P = 0.003), Th17 proportion (P = 0.008), C-reactive protein (P < 0.001), and ASDAS (P = 0.038), but not with IL-6, Th1 proportion, or other characteristics. Meanwhile, HDAC4 increased from W0 to W12 (P < 0.001); HDAC4 at W8 (P = 0.014) and W12 (P = 0.006) was raised in ASAS40-response patients than ASAS40-non-response patients; further subgroup analysis showed that HDAC4 at W12 was higher in ASAS40-response patients than ASAS40-non-response patients (P = 0.016) in the TNFi-treated group, but not in the NSAID-treated group. In addition, HDAC4 negatively regulated the polarization of naïve CD4⁺ T cells toward Th17 (P < 0.01), but not Th1 or Th2.

Conclusion

Histone deacetylase 4 is associated with lower inflammation, and the disease activity negatively regulates Th17 polarization, whose increment after treatment reflects favorable outcomes in patients with AS.

Efficacy and Safety of HLX03, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study

INTRODUCTION

Adalimumab has been used successfully in the treatment of psoriasis. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity between HLX03, an adalimumab biosimilar, and adalimumab in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

In this double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group study, 262 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomized (1:1) to receive HLX03 or adalimumab (80 mg at week 1, 40 mg at week 2, and then 40 mg every 2 weeks) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at week 16 comparing to baseline. Equivalence was demonstrated if 95% confidence interval (CI) of the between group difference fell within the equivalence margins of ± 15%. Other efficacy endpoints, safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In the full analysis set, PASI improvements at week 16 was 83.5% (n = 131) in the HLX03 group and 82.0% (n = 130) in the adalimumab group, with a least-square-mean difference of 1.5% (95% CI - 3.9% to 6.8%). There were no significant between-group differences in all secondary efficacy analyses including proportion of patients achieving ≥ 75% improvement from baseline PASI (PASI 75), physician global assessment (PGA) 0/1 (clear or almost clear) and change in dermatology life quality index (DLQI) score. The incidences of adverse events and the proportion of patients with antidrug antibodies were also comparable between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

HLX03 demonstrated equivalent efficacy, similar safety and immunogenicity to reference adalimumab, supporting its development as an alternative treatment for patients with plaque psoriasis in China.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinadrugtrials.org.cn, CTR20171123 (November 27, 2017); ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03316781 (October 20, 2017).

Physicochemical and functional characterization of HS016, a biosimilar of adalimumab (Humira)

The characterization of a biosimilar drug HS016, the reference product adalimumab (Humira), and their biosimilarities were determined using physical chemistry and functional similarity tests. The primary and higher order structures, size and charge variants, glycosylation profiles, and in vitro potency of both antibodies were characterized both for unstressed and stability samples. Slight differences were observed in the relative levels of methionine oxidation, low molecular weight components, terminal lysine variant, high mannoses and galactosylated glycans between HS016 and Humira. However, no differences in antigen binding activity, Fc receptor affinity, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity or complemented-dependent cytotoxicity were found. The primary and higher order structures, physicochemical properties, and biological activity of HS016 and adalimumab were similar.

Evaluation of adalimumab biosimilar candidate (HS016) in Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis based on a health survey: sub-analysis of a phase 3 study

Objective

The equivalence of the biosimilar HS016 to adalimumab (Humira) for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients has been previously validated. The aim was to compare the efficacy of HS016 and adalimumab in stratified subgroups at different time points using Health Assessment Questionnaire for Spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S) and short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires.

Methods

We carried out a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, positive control, phase 3 trial of patients with active AS. They were selected randomly to be subcutaneously administered 40 mg HS016 or adalimumab every 2 weeks for a total treatment period of 24 weeks in a 2:1 ratio. A health surveys were used to assess mental and physical improvements of patients as well as other factors.

Results

HAQ-S revealed that changes in scores from baseline in both groups were time dependent until 14 weeks and that during the first 4 weeks of treatment the changes declined rapidly. The SF-36 health survey revealed that both HS016 and adalimumab produced rapid beneficial effects against AS during the first 2 weeks of therapy, which gradually declined between 2 and 12 weeks and flattened out after 12 weeks until 24 weeks.

Conclusion

This trial demonstrated that both HS016 and adalimumab produced rapid improvements in symptoms during the first 2 weeks of treatment. These findings suggest that HS016 is an alternative economical treatment for Chinese AS patients producing a rapid amelioration of symptoms, aiding them to recover their lifestyle satisfaction.

Trial registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx, ChiCTR1900022520, retrospectively registered.

Key points

• HS016 and adalimumab produced rapid AS symptom improvements during the first 2 weeks followed by a slowdown of improvements until week 4 with afterwards few improvements evaluated by HAQ-S

• The improvements according to the short form of the 36 (SF-36) questionnaires revealed similar trends as for HAQ-S

• There was no significant difference in HAQ-S and SF-36 scores between HS016 and adalimumab

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10067-021-05943-w.

An Update Review of Biosimilars of Adalimumab in Psoriasis - Bioequivalence and Interchangeability

Biologic drugs have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis and other rheumatological diseases. In recent years, many biosimilar agents that are highly similar in structure and function to their originator products have been developed, including the tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonist adalimumab. The considerably lower cost of these products has greatly cut the economic burden of the patients and increased the accessibility of biologic therapies worldwide. The US Food and Drug Administration and/or the European Medicines Agency have approved eight biosimilars of adalimumab (ABP 501/BI 695501/SB5/GP2017/FKB327/MSB11022/PF-06410293/CT-P17) for the treatment of psoriasis, and others are under review. Given that these agents showed pharmacokinetic, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles comparable to those of the originator, adalimumab biosimilars were licensed for all indications approved for reference adalimumab based on extrapolation; however, some of the equivalence studies were only conducted in one or two disease populations. This review discusses the bioequivalence of adalimumab biosimilars as demonstrated by various clinical trials, the extrapolation of indications, guidance and policies of the EU and US on interchangeability (nonmedical switching/automatic substitution) between biosimilars and originators, and the real-life practices of switching from reference adalimumab to the respective biosimilars. Further data from real-world studies and post-marketing analyses are needed better to address the efficacy and safety of the transition strategy.

The global landscape on interchangeability of biosimilars

INTRODUCTION

Biosimilars hold the potential to be an integral healthcare component that can significantly improve affordability and thereby accessibility of the otherwise expensive biotherapeutic products. Regulators, payors, and policymakers, each have a major role to play in successful adoption of biosimilars. One of the issues that has been a point of frequent discussion is that of interchangeability of biosimilars.

AREAS COVERED

This article aims to review the position that the major regulatory bodies have taken on interchangeability of biosimilars. Key issues that remain are also discussed. Adalimumab and etanercept have been chosen as real-world case studies to demonstrate interchangeability considerations. The need for gaining global harmonization on interchangeability is highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

A global harmonization on the interchangeability can likely accelerate biosimilar adoption and result in better accessibility to biologics. Experience gained with real-world studies supports switching to biosimilars from originators however post-marketing pharmacovigilance should be in place to assess the risk-benefit profile of biosimilars in the long run.

Changes in Efficacy Indicators for Adalimumab Biosimilar Candidate (HS016) for the Treatment of Active Ankylosing Spondylitis at Various Time Points

Objectives: A phase III, 24-weeks Chinese clinical trial demonstrated that efficacy and safety outcomes of treatments with 40 mg/0.8 ml HS016 (n = 416) or adalimumab (n = 232) for active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients was comparable. In the present study, a subanalysis of the clinical trial was conducted to determine whether also individual efficacy indicators were comparable between HS016 and adalimumab. Methods: The individual efficacy indicators total and nocturnal back pain, global assessment of disease activity, swollen joint count, Maastricht AS Enthesitis Score, Bath AS Disease Activity Index, Bath AS Functional Index, Bath AS Metrology Index and chest expansion, were assessed at baseline and every 2 weeks during the treatment period. Results: This subanalysis revealed no significant difference between the patient groups treated with HS016 or adalimumab for any individual efficacy indicator investigated at any time point (all p > 0.05) beside faster total back pain score improvements in the adalimumab group on week 10, 12 and 22, which became equal at week 24. Among these indicators, chest expansion showed a significant increase at each time point compared with baseline, whereas all other efficacy indicators showed significant decreases compared with baseline at each time point (all p < 0.05). All efficacy indicators had increased or decreased rapidly by week 2, and the values continued to increase/decrease up to week 12, with subsequent smaller changes thereafter up to week 24 of treatment. Conclusion: The response trajectory of most individual efficacy indicators was comparable between HS016 and adalimumab at each time point during the 24 weeks of the trial. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=37910, identifier [ChiCTR1900022520].

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Phase 1 Clinical Trial Comparing the Pharmacokinetic, Safety, and Immunogenicity of the Biosimilar HS016 and the Originator Adalimumab in Chinese Healthy Male Subjects

A comparison of the immunogenicity, safety, and pharmacokinetic properties of HS016 and its originator, adalimumab, was conducted in Chinese healthy male subjects. This was a phase 1 single‐center, randomized, parallel‐group double‐blind clinical trial. Chinese healthy male subjects (1:1) allocated to HS016 and adalimumab groups were treated with single subcutaneous injections (40 mg/0.8 mL). The pharmacokinetic equivalence of HS016 and adalimumab was assessed by (1) the area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last detectable drug concentration (AUC_0‐t), (2) the AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC_0‐∞), and (3) the maximum plasma concentration (C_max). Other pharmacokinetic parameters (time to C_max, apparent clearance, and half‐life), safety, and immunogenicity were also evaluated. A total of 136 subjects were randomly divided into HS016 (n = 68) or adalimumab (n = 68) groups. The geometric means of AUC_0‐t, AUC_0‐∞, and C_max were similar for HS016 and adalimumab. The 90%CIs of AUC_0‐t (87.2% to 106.1%), AUC_0‐∞ (87.4% to 108.4%), and C_max (98.6% to 113.6%) were all within the prespecified bioequivalence criteria (80% to 125%). The incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar in both groups, with most TEAEs being mild; only 3 (4.4%) subjects in the HS016 group experienced moderate TEAEs. No significant differences in the time to C_max, apparent clearance, half‐life, and immunogenicity were detected. The pharmacokinetic profile of HS016 was equivalent to that of the originator, adalimumab, with similar safety and immunogenicity profiles. HS016 may be considered for assessment in the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis.