Methods of Estimating Kidney Function for Drug Dosing in Special Populations

Estimated glomerular filtration rates are higher when creatinine-based equations are compared with a cystatin C-based equation in coronavirus disease 2019

OBJECTIVES

Estimations of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are based on analyses of creatinine and cystatin C, respectively. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often have acute kidney injury (AKI) and are at increased risk of drug-induced kidney injury. The aim of this study was to compare creatinine-based eGFR equations to cystatin C-based eGFR in ICU patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

After informed consent, we included 370 adult ICU patients with COVID-19. Creatinine and cystatin C were analyzed at admission to the ICU as part of the routine care. Creatinine-based eGFR (ml/min) was calculated using the following equations, developed in chronological order; the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G), Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)1999, MDRD 2006, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Lund-Malmö revised (LMR) equations, which were compared with eGFR calculated using the cystatin C-based Caucasian Asian Pediatric Adult (CAPA) equation.

RESULTS

The median eGFR when determined by C-G was 99 ml/min and interquartile range (IQR: 67 ml/min). Corresponding estimations for MDRD1999 were 90 ml/min (IQR: 54); MDRD2006: 85 ml/min (IQR: 51); CKD-EPI: 91 ml/min (IQR: 47); and for LMR 83 ml/min (IQR: 41). eGFR was calculated using cystatin C and the CAPA equation value was 70 ml/min (IQR: 38). All differences between creatinine-based eGFR versus cystatin C-based eGFR were significant (p < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Estimation of GFR based on various analyses of creatinine are higher when compared with a cystatin C-based equation. The C-G equation had the worst performance and should not be used in combination with modern creatinine analysis methods for determination of drug dosage in COVID-19 patients.

Long-term clinical outcomes in older patients with acute venous thromboembolism who have renal impairment

INTRODUCTION

Renal impairment (RI) may induce an inflammatory/procoagulant state as well as platelet dysfunction. Little is known on the prevalence of RI and long-term prognosis of older patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who have concomitant RI.

METHODS

In a prospective multicenter cohort, we analyzed 912 patients aged ≥65 years with acute VTE. Using the CKD-EPI formula, we defined three categories of baseline renal function: estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 ml/min/1.73m² (no RI), 30-59 ml/min/1.73m² (moderate RI), and <30 ml/min/1.73m² (severe RI). The outcomes were VTE recurrence, major bleeding, and overall mortality. We examined the association between renal function and clinical outcomes using competing risk regression models, adjusting for relevant confounders and periods of anticoagulation.

RESULTS

We followed 912 patients over a median duration of 29.6 months. Overall, 313 (34%) patients had moderate and 51 (6%) severe RI. One hundred and seven patients (12%) had VTE recurrence, 125 (14%) had major bleeding, and 186 (20%) died during follow-up. After adjustment, severe RI was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of major bleeding (sub-hazard ratio [SHR] 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.0) compared to no RI, but not with VTE recurrence (SHR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2-1.8) or overall mortality (hazard ratio 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.9). Moderate RI was not significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

RI was common among older patients with acute VTE. Severe RI was associated with a 2-fold increased long-term risk of major bleeding, without a risk increase in terms of VTE recurrence and overall mortality. Older patients with moderate RI did not carry worse prognosis.

Understanding kidney disease in rural central Uganda - Findings from a qualitative study

As part of a multicentre study on kidney disease (ARK) undertaken in Malawi, South Africa and Uganda we undertook a social science component in Uganda to gather information on people's understandings and perceptions of a diagnosis of kidney dysfunction, treatment and treatment seeking. We recruited 46 people who had been given information about kidney dysfunction and had been found to have some, usually early, signs of mild impairment. Data were collected during two in-depth interviews. Most participants had heard of the condition, but half denied knowledge of the health status of their kidneys or receiving results of tests from the clinic team. This response may have been linked to a lack of symptoms, for those with early stage kidney dysfunction. The treatment people reported receiving caused some uncertainty about condition severity. This may be because several people were treated for other conditions (such as urinary tract infections) and did not require treatment specifically for kidney disease. In our study, participants assessed illness severity based on symptoms and treatment and compared with the progression of other conditions.

Correct use of non-indexed eGFR for drug dosing and renal drug-related problems at hospital admission

Purpose

Two to seven percent of the German adult population has a renal impairment (RI) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73m². This often remains unrecognized and adjustment of drug therapy is lacking. To determine renal function in clinical routine, the CKD-EPI equation is used to calculate an indexed eGFR (ml/min/1.73m²). For drug dosing, it has to be individualized to a non-indexed eGFR (ml/min) by the patient’s body surface area. Here, we investigated the number of patients admitted to urological wards of a teaching hospital with RI between July and December 2016. Additionally, we correctly used the eGFR_non-indexed for drug and dosage adjustments and to analyse the use of renal risk drugs (RRD) and renal drug-related problems (rDRP).

Methods

In a retrospective observational study, urological patients with pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at hospital admission and eGFR_indexed (CKD-EPI) of 15–59 ml/min/1.73m² were identified. Indexed eGFR (ml/min/1.73m²) was recalculated with body surface area to non-indexed eGFR (ml/min) for correct drug dosing. Medication at admission was reviewed for RRD and based on the eGFR_non-indexed for rDRP, e.g. inappropriate dose or contraindication.

Results

Of 1320 screened patients, 270 (20.5%) presented with an eGFR_indexed of 15–59 ml/min/1.73m². After readjustment, 203 (15.4%) patients had an eGFR_non-indexed of 15–59 ml/min. Of these, 190 (93.6%) used ≥ 1 drugs at admission with 660 of 1209 (54.7%) drugs classified as RRD. At least one rDRP was identified in 115 (60.5%) patients concerning 264 (21.8%) drugs.

Conclusion

Renal impairment is a common risk factor for medication safety in urologic patients admitted to a hospital. Considerable shifts were seen in eGFR-categories when correctly calculating eGFR_non-indexed for drug dosing purposes. The fact that more than half of the study patients showed rDRP at hospital admission underlines the need to consider this risk factor appropriately.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02953-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Creatinine versus cystatin C to estimate glomerular filtration rate in adults with congenital heart disease: Results of the Boston Adult Congenital Heart Disease Biobank

BACKGROUND

Glomerular filtration rate is a key physiologic variable with a central role in clinical decision making and a strong association with prognosis in diverse populations. Reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is common among adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of outpatient ACHD ≥18 years old seen in 2012-2017. Creatinine and cystatin C were measured; eGFR was calculated using either the creatinine or cystatin C Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI_Cr and CKD-EPI_CysC, respectively). Survival analysis was performed to define the relationship between eGFR and both all-cause mortality and a composite outcome of death or nonelective cardiovascular hospitalization.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 911 ACHD (39 ± 14 years old, 49% female). Mean CKD-EPI_Cr and CKD-EPI_CysC were similar (101 ± 20 vs 100 ± 23 mL/min/1.73 m²), but CKD-EPI_Cr estimates were higher for patients with a Fontan circulation (n = 131, +10 ± 19 mL/min/1.73 m²). After mean follow-up of 659 days, 128 patients (14.1%) experienced the composite outcome and 31 (3.4%) died. CKD-EPI_CysC more strongly predicted all-cause mortality (eGFR <60 vs >90 mL/min/1.73 m²: CKD-EPI_CysC unadjusted HR = 20.2 [95% CI 7.6-53.1], C-statistic = 0.797; CKD-EPI_Cr unadjusted HR = 4.6 [1.7-12.7], C-statistic = 0.620). CKD-EPI_CysC independently predicted the composite outcome, whereas CKD-EPI_Cr did not (CKD-EPI_CysC adjusted HR = 3.0 [1.7-5.3]; CKD-EPI_Cr adjusted HR = 1.5 [0.8-3.1]). Patients reclassified to a lower eGFR category by CKD-EPI_CysC, compared with CKD-EPI_Cr, were at increased risk for the composite outcome (HR = 2.9 [2.0-4.3], P < .0001); those reclassified to a higher eGFR class were at lower risk (HR = 0.5 [0.3-0.9], P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Cystatin C-based eGFR more strongly predicts clinical events than creatinine-based eGFR in ACHD. Creatinine-based methods appear particularly questionable in the Fontan circulation.

Evaluation of renal function equations to predict amikacin clearance

Objective: To evaluate the predictive performance of eight renal function equations to describe amikacin elimination in a large standard population with a wide range of age. Methods: Retrospective study of adult hospitalized patients treated with amikacin and monitored in the clinical pharmacokinetics laboratory of a pharmacy service. Renal function was calculated as Cockcroft-Gault with total, adjusted and ideal body weight, MDRD-4, CKD-EPI, rLM, BIS1, and FAS. One compartment model with first-order elimination, including interindividual variability on clearance and volume of distribution and combined residual error model was selected as a base structural model. A pharmaco-statistical analysis was performed following a non-linear mixed effects modeling approach (NONMEM 7.3 software). Results: 198 patients (61 years [18-93]) and 566 measured amikacin plasma concentrations were included. All the estimated glomerular filtration rate and creatinine clearance equations evaluated described properly the data. The linear relationship between clearance and glomerular filtration rate based on rLM showed a statistically significant improvement in the fit of the data. rLM must be evaluated carefully in renal failure for amikacin dose adjustment. Conclusions: Revised Lund-Malmö (rLM) and CKD-EPI showed the superior predictive performance of amikacin drug elimination comparing to all the alternative metrics evaluated.

Differences in Kidney Function Estimates Based on Creatinine and/or Cystatin C in Non-Traumatic Amputation Patients and Their Impact on Drug Prescribing

Accurate kidney function estimates are necessary when prescribing renally-eliminated medications. Our objectives were to investigate how amputation affects estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and to determine if dosing recommendations differ among different eGFR equations. In a cohort study of non-traumatic amputation patients, eGFR based on creatinine and/or cystatin C were measured before and after amputation. Prescribed, renally-eliminated medications were compared with dosing guidelines in Renbase^®. Data from 38 patients with a median age of 75 years were analyzed. The median (range) eGFR was 65 (15⁻103), 38 (13⁻79), and 48 (13⁻86) mL/min/1.73 m² before amputation and 80 (22⁻107), 51 (13⁻95), and 62 (16⁻100) mL/min/1.73 m² after amputation for eGFR_Creatinine, eGFR_CystatinC, and eGFR_Combined, respectively (p < 0.01). From before to after amputation, eGFR increased on average by 8.5, 6.1, and 7.4 mL/min/1.73 m² for eGFR_Creatinine, eGFR_CystatinC, and eGFR_Combined (all p < 0.01), respectively. At least one renally-eliminated medication was prescribed at a higher dose than recommended in 37.8% of patients using eGFR_CystatinC, 17.6% using eGFR_Combined and 10.8% using eGFR_Creatinine. In conclusion, amputation affects eGFR regardless of the eGFR equations. The differences among equations would impact prescribing of renally-eliminated medications, particularly when switching from creatinine to cystatin C.