Medication-Induced Akathisia with Newly Approved Antipsychotics in Patients with a Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Review of Management Considerations for Excoriation Disorder in Older Adults

Excoriation disorder (ED) is defined as compulsive skin picking that results in skin damage and emotional distress. Optimal management of ED includes individualized treatment plans consisting of psychotherapies, behavioral and pharmacologic interventions. Compared with younger populations, older adults are at increased risk for poor outcomes, such as infection and hospitalization, and require unique management considerations. Risk factors that contribute to disease burden include age-related changes to the skin and underlying medical and psychiatric comorbidities. A literature review was conducted on ED yielding limited evidence exclusive to older adults. The authors suggest a therapeutic approach to ED in older adults based on available evidence and experience from inpatient and outpatient psychiatric settings. Finally, opportunities for future research are highlighted.

A review on side effect management of second-generation antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia: a drug safety perspective

INTRODUCTION

Effective side effects management present a challenge in antipsychotic treatment with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). In recent years, most of the commonly used SGAs, except for clozapine, have been shown to differ only slightly in their effectiveness, but considerably regarding perceived side effects, safety profiles, and compatibility to preexisting medical conditions.

AREAS COVERED

The current state of available evidence on side-effect management in SGA treatment of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) is reviewed. In addition, current guideline recommendations are summarized, highlighting evidence gaps.

EXPERT OPINION

SGA safety and side effects needs to be considered in treatment planning. Shared decision-making assistants (SDMA) can support patients, practitioners and relatives to orient their decisions toward avoiding side effects relevant to patients' adherence. Alongside general measures like psychosocial and psychotherapeutic care, switching to better tolerated SGAs can be considered a relatively safe strategy. By contrast, novel meta-analytical evidence emphasizes that dose reduction of SGAs can statistically increase the risk of relapse and other unfavorable outcomes. Further, depending on the type and severity of SGA-related side effects, specific treatments can be used to alleviate induced side effects (e.g. add-on metformin to reduce weight-gain). Finally, discontinuation should be reserved for acute emergencies.

An umbrella review of adverse effects associated with antipsychotic medications: the need for complementary study designs

Antipsychotic medications are widely prescribed in psychotic illnesses and other mental disorders. Effectiveness is well-established, particularly for reducing symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations, but can be impacted by tolerability. Adverse effects are wide-ranging, and vary between antipsychotics, which is clinically important. This umbrella review aimed to comprehensively summarise the extent and quality of evidence for adverse effects associated with antipsychotic use in people with mental disorders. We included 32 meta-analyses of randomised trials and observational studies. The overall robustness of reported associations was considered in terms of review quality, heterogeneity, excess significance bias, and prediction intervals. Using this approach, endocrine and metabolic, movement-related, and sedation and sleep problems were the clinical domains with strongest evidence. The overall quality of included meta-analyses was low, and individual adverse effects were not typically examined in meta-analyses of both randomised trials and observational study designs. Future reviews should focus on adhering to methodological guidelines, consider the complementary strengths of different study designs, and integrate clinically relevant information on absolute rates and severity of adverse effects.

Lurasidone for the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Design, Development, and Place in Therapy

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature on the drug design, development, and therapy of lurasidone for the treatment of schizophrenia. Lurasidone has antagonistic effects on the dopamine D2, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A, and 5-HT7 receptors and a partial agonistic effect on the 5-HT1A receptor with low affinities for muscarinic M1, histamine H1, and a1 adrenergic receptors. The receptor-binding profile of lurasidone is thought to be associated with fewer side effects such as anticholinergic effects, lipid abnormalities, hyperglycemia, and weight gain. Behavioral pharmacological studies have demonstrated that lurasidone exerts anxiolytic and antidepressive effects and improves cognitive function, which are associated with the modulation of 5-HT7 and 5-HT1A receptors. Literature search using PubMed was performed to find published studies of randomized controlled trials and recent meta-analyses regarding efficacy and safety, particularly metabolic side effects of lurasidone in schizophrenia. In short-term studies, the results of randomized placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses have suggested that lurasidone was superior to placebo in improving total psychopathology, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and general psychopathology in patients with acute schizophrenia. Regarding safety, lurasidone had minimal metabolic side effects, and was identified as one of the drugs with the most benign profiles for metabolic side effects. Long-term trials revealed that lurasidone had the preventive effects on relapse, with minimal effects on weight gain and other metabolic side effects. Furthermore, lurasidone improves cognitive and functional performance of patients with schizophrenia, especially in long-term treatment. Patients with schizophrenia require long-term treatment with antipsychotics for relapse prevention; thus, minimizing weight gain and other side effects is crucial. Lurasidone is suitable as one of the first-line antipsychotic drugs in the acute phase, and a switching strategy should be considered during the maintenance phase, to balance efficacy and adverse effects and achieve favorable outcomes in the long-term course of schizophrenia.

Efficacy of Serotonin and Dopamine Activity Modulators in the Treatment of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Rapid Review

Schizophrenia is among the fifteen most disabling diseases worldwide. Negative symptoms (NS) are highly prevalent in schizophrenia, negatively affect the functional outcome of the disorder, and their treatment is difficult and rarely specifically investigated. Serotonin-dopamine activity modulators (SDAMs), of which aripiprazole, cariprazine, brexpiprazole, and lumateperone were approved for schizophrenia treatment, represent a possible therapy to reduce NS. The aim of this rapid review is to summarize the evidence on this topic to make it readily available for psychiatrists treating NS and for further research. We searched the PubMed database for original studies using SDAM, aripiprazole, cariprazine, brexpiprazole, lumateperone, schizophrenia, and NS as keywords. We included four mega-analyses, eight meta-analyses, two post hoc analyses, and 20 clinical trials. Aripiprazole, cariprazine, and brexpiprazole were more effective than placebo in reducing NS. Only six studies compared SDAMs with other classes of antipsychotics, demonstrating a superiority in the treatment of NS mainly for cariprazine. The lack of specific research and various methodological issues, related to the study population and the assessment of NS, may have led to these partial results. Here, we highlight the need to conduct new methodologically robust investigations with head-to-head treatment comparisons and long-term observational studies on homogeneous groups of patients evaluating persistent NS with first- and second-generation scales, namely the Brief Negative Symptom Scale and the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms. This rapid review can expand research on NS therapeutic strategies in schizophrenia, which is fundamental for the long-term improvement of patients’ quality of life.

Akathisia and atypical antipsychotics: relation to suicidality, agitation and depression in a clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Akathisia is among the most unpleasant side effects related to antipsychotic drug (AP) use, and possible associations between akathisia and agitation, depression and suicidal behaviour, respectively, have been described in previous literature. New generation antipsychotics are however regarded less prone to induce this particular adverse effect compared to older drugs, but evidence is incomplete and in need of confirmation from clinically relevant samples and settings. We, therefore, aim to investigate akathisia at hospital discharge for patients consecutively admitted with acute-phase psychosis and treated with atypical antipsychotics according to guideline-concordant clinical practice.

METHODS

This exploratory study is part of a naturalistic randomised controlled study in patients admitted with acute phase psychosis (N = 109). We report cross-sectional data at discharge/first follow-up after acute psychiatric hospital admission for patients with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant positive associations between akathisia and the following; suicidality in men (Beta 0.306, p = 0.048), but not in women; agitation in those previously unexposed to antipsychotics (Beta 0.288, p = 0.047) and depression in those exposed to antipsychotics before hospital admittance (Beta 0.375, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

Main findings were that akathisia is still a prevalent side effect in a clinically relevant sample of patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Our results suggest that akathisia is significantly associated with depression, suicidality and agitation in different subgroups of patients receiving APs. Akathisia can be detrimental and the relations between akathisia and depression, suicidality and agitation should be investigated further in prospective, hypothesis-testing studies with larger samples.

Antipsychotic-induced movement disorders: integrative review

Objective: To identify movement disorders induced by antipsychotics. Methods: We selected clinical trials from MEDLINE and LILACS databases without publication date restriction. Studies of antipsychotics as a pharmacological intervention, compared or not to other interventions were included (combined treatments were not included). The primary outcome was movement disorders. Two independent reviewers analyzed the studies and summarized them in an electronic spreadsheet. We assessed the quality of the selected studies using the PEDro scale. Results: Five studies were included in this review. In these studies, it was possible to identify the main psychiatric symptoms and their severity, as well as dyskinetic movements. When a reduction in dyskinetic movements was observed in treatments with both atypical and typical antipsychotics, there were adverse effects. Those included excessive sedation, loss of body mass, vomiting, and leukocytopenia. Conclusion: This study verified the findings in literature on the effects of antipsychotics, including the type of medication, dosage, and form of administration, as well as instruments used to assess the outcome related to movement disorders. It was not possible to determine the best therapeutic dose for managing the disorders due to the significant distinction in dosages and medications. All five studies had some effect related to the drug use or its withdrawal.

Treatable Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders Not to Be Missed

Hyperkinetic movement disorders are characterized by the presence of abnormal involuntary movements, comprising most notably dystonia, chorea, myoclonus, and tremor. Possible causes are numerous, including autoimmune disorders, infections of the central nervous system, metabolic disturbances, genetic diseases, drug-related causes and functional disorders, making the diagnostic process difficult for clinicians. Some diagnoses may be delayed without serious consequences, but diagnosis delays may prove detrimental in treatable disorders, ranging from functional disabilities, as in dopa-responsive dystonia, to death, as in Whipple's disease. In this review, we focus on treatable disorders that may present with prominent hyperkinetic movement disorders.

[The newer antipsychotic cariprazine (reagila): perspectives for use in different stages of schizophrenia therapy]

Cariprazine is a newer 3rd generation antipsychotic acting as partial agonist for dopamine receptors with unique higher affinity for D3 than D2 receptors. This review article summarizes key data from preclinical and clinical studies of cariprazine including pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety/acceptability in acute short-term and long-term maintenance and relapse prevention therapy in patients with schizophrenia. Efficacy and safety of cariprazine in patients schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms resistant to previous antipsychotic therapy is discussed as well.

Antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal side effects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Background

Antipsychotic agents are the basis for the pharmacological management of acute and chronic schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, mood disorders with psychotic feature, and other psychotic disorders. Antipsychotic medication use is frequently associated with unfavorable adverse effects such as extrapyramidal side effects (EPSEs). Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to determine the magnitude of antipsychotic-induced EPSEs.

Method

A literature search was conducted using legitimate databases, indexing services, and directories including PubMed/MEDLINE (Ovid^®), EMBASE (Ovid^®), google scholar and WorldCat to retrieve studies. Following screening and eligibility, the relevant data were extracted from the included studies using an Excel sheet and exported to STATA 15.0 software for analyses. The Random effects pooling model was used to analyze outcome measures at a 95% confidence interval. Besides, publication bias analysis was conducted. The protocol has been registered on PROSPERO with ID: CRD42020175168.

Result

In total, 15 original articles were included for the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of antipsychotic-induced EPSEs among patient taking antipsychotic medications was 37% (95% CI: 18–55%, before sensitivity) and 31% (95% CI: 19–44%, after sensitivity). The prevalence of antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia was 20% (95% CI: 11–28%), 11% (95% CI: 6–17%), and 7% (95% CI: 4–9%), respectively. To confirm a small-study effect, Egger’s regression test accompanied by funnel plot asymmetry demonstrated that there was a sort of publication bias in studies reporting akathisia and tardive dyskinesia.

Conclusion

The prevalence of antipsychotic-induced EPSEs was considerably high. One in five and more than one in ten patients experienced parkinsonism and akathisia, respectively. Appropriate prevention and early management of these effects can enhance the net benefits of antipsychotics.

A case series of serious and unexpected adverse drug reactions under treatment with cariprazine

Reporting of new or unexpected adverse drug reactions of medicines that are subject to additional monitoring ("black triangle" label), such as the antipsychotic drug cariprazine, is of paramount importance to improve pharmacotherapy safety.

Safety and tolerability of lumateperone 42 mg: An open-label antipsychotic switch study in outpatients with stable schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Lumateperone is a mechanistically novel agent FDA-approved for the treatment of schizophrenia. Efficacy and favorable tolerability of lumateperone were demonstrated in 2 short-term placebo-controlled studies in patients with schizophrenia. This open-label study investigated the short-term safety/tolerability of lumateperone in outpatients with stable schizophrenia switched from previous antipsychotic treatment.

METHODS

Adult outpatients with stable schizophrenia were switched from previous antipsychotics to lumateperone 42 mg once daily for six weeks, then patients were switched back to previous or another approved antipsychotic for 2 weeks. The primary objective assessed adverse events (AE), vital signs, laboratory tests, and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Schizophrenia symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

RESULTS

Among 301 patients switched to lumateperone (study completion=71.2%), treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 137 patients (45.5%), with 92 (30.6%) experiencing a drug-related TEAE. The most common drug-related TEAEs were somnolence (6.6%), headache (5.3%), and dry mouth (5.3%). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. EPS-related TEAEs were rare (1.0%). There were significant decreases from previous antipsychotics baseline in total cholesterol (P<.01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P<.05), body weight (P<.01), and prolactin (P<.01); most of these parameters worsened within 2 weeks of resuming other antipsychotic treatment. PANSS Total scores remained stable relative to previous antipsychotics baseline during lumateperone treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In outpatients with stable schizophrenia, lumateperone was well tolerated with low risk of cardiometabolic and EPS adverse effects and stably maintained or improved schizophrenia symptoms. These data further support the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of lumateperone in patients with schizophrenia.

Cariprazine as a therapeutic option for schizophrenia: a drug evaluation

Introduction: Schizophrenia is a very disabling condition that may result in a significant impairment of individual, professional, and social adjustments. Antipsychotics (APs), the first-line treatment for schizophrenia, in many cases modify the course of the disease, by reducing the institutionalization risk, at the price of severe and invalidating side effects. Cariprazine is one of the latest second-generation APs (SGAs) acting as a partial agonist of type 2 and 3 dopamine receptors, which was recently approved for the treatment of adult schizophrenia.Areas covered: The authors provide a critical review and commentary on the currently available data on the effectiveness and tolerability of cariprazine in schizophrenic patients, with a particular focus on its specific target symptoms.Expert opinion: Cariprazine appears significantly effective on both acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia, and in improving positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms, slightly more than other SGAs. It shows a good safety and tolerability profile, with akathisia being its most common side effect. Although further independent studies are needed to clarify its precise advantages over other SGAs, cariprazine seems a promising compound not only in schizophrenia, but also in a broad range of psychiatric conditions, including perhaps bipolar and addictive disorders.

Treatment of Antipsychotic-Induced Akathisia: Role of Serotonin 5-HT2a Receptor Antagonists

Akathisia is one of the most prevalent and distressing adverse effects associated with antipsychotic drug treatment. Propranolol, a non-selective beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist, is currently considered a first-line treatment for antipsychotic-induced akathisia (AIA). Surprisingly, the evidence for its anti-akathisia effect is modest. Propranolol's side effects (e.g. orthostatic hypotension, bradycardia), contraindications (e.g. asthma) and increased complexity in titration schedules limit its use in some patients. Anticholinergic agents and benzodiazepines merely provide symptomatic relief in patients with AIA. Effective and well-tolerated treatment remains a major unmet need in akathisia and warrants a search for new anti-akathisia agents. Accumulating evidence during the last two decades indicates that agents with marked postsynaptic serotonin 5-HT_2a receptor antagonism (ritanserin, cyproheptadine, trazodone, mianserin, mirtazapine) may represent a new class of potential anti-akathisia remedies. Among these agents, low-dose mirtazapine (7.5 mg or 15 mg once daily) has demonstrated the most compelling evidence for therapeutic efficacy. In this narrative review we highlight the clinical significance of AIA, outline major approaches for its management and propose a practical algorithm for its treatment.

Identification of clinical phenotypes in schizophrenia: the role of lurasidone

The treatment of schizophrenia includes the control of symptoms, the prevention of relapses, and amelioration of adaptive skills for patient re-integration into society. Antipsychotic drugs are the agents of choice for the treatment of schizophrenia, as they reduce the positive symptoms of psychosis. Lurasidone is a second-generation antipsychotic drug representing a novel and useful clinical tool for the management of schizophrenia. A board consisting of a panel of Italian expert psychiatrists was organized with the following aims: (a) defining the current modalities of use of lurasidone, highlighted through 17 specific questions; (b) defining and agreeing the main features of the drug and the principal reasons to suggest its administration. We established that lurasidone is suggested at any age, with no gender difference, at all stages of the disease. The switch from previous treatments is done primarily because of lack of efficacy as well as poor adherence/tolerability. Lurasidone is among the best-tolerated antipsychotics, and its use is indicated in the presence of different comorbidities. A wide range of dosages is available, allowing safe titration in particular cases, with the highest dose (148 mg) generally used for the treatment of the acute phase. The discontinuation rate due to poor tolerability, low compliance, and interactions with other drugs is very low. Akathisia is the most reported adverse event, but it may be controlled by dose reduction. Lurasidone does not possess a marked sedative action but, in agitated patients, can be associated with sedative drugs, such as benzodiazepines. The most frequent reason for switching to other therapies is the need for long-acting formulations, as in patients at risk of very low adherence or suicide. Lurasidone does not strongly impact metabolism or the cardiovascular system (QT interval), and does not influence the metabolism of other drugs, showing good efficacy and tolerability.

The Influence of Substance Use on Side Effects of Olanzapine, Quetiapine, Risperidone, and Ziprasidone in Psychosis

BACKGROUND

Side effects restrict the optimal use of antipsychotics. Little is known about the influence of substance use on side effects. The aim of this study was to compare antipsychotic side effects in patients with psychosis with and without substance use, while also taking medication history and diagnosis into consideration.

METHODS

All patients (n = 226, mean age 34, females 33%) diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD; F20-F29) or other psychosis (F30-F32; F10-F19), were treated with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone, and were assessed at baseline, 4-weeks, 14-weeks, and 27-weeks. The UKU-Side Effects Self-Rating Scale version was used to evaluate the side effect profiles, and the information on substance use was based on the Clinician Drug Use Scale.

RESULTS

At baseline, 30% of the patients used substances, 54% were diagnosed with SSD, and 47% were antipsychotic naïve. The occurrence of side effects in total was not different in patients with substance use compared to without after 4-weeks of treatment, nor in the follow-up period. At 4-weeks there were some group differences in relation to substance use, diagnosis, and medication history for single side effects. Patients with substance use showed more increased dream activity, less reduced salivation, and more gynecomastia. Patients with SSD showed less neurological side effects, orgasm dysfunction, and tension/inner unrest. The medication naïve patients showed increased hypokinesia/akinesia.

CONCLUSION

Substance use alone does not influence the general magnitude of side effects of antipsychotic medication and does not indicate a different prescription practice in patients with psychosis and substance use.

Bipolar disorders

Bipolar disorders are a complex group of severe and chronic disorders that includes bipolar I disorder, defined by the presence of a syndromal, manic episode, and bipolar II disorder, defined by the presence of a syndromal, hypomanic episode and a major depressive episode. Bipolar disorders substantially reduce psychosocial functioning and are associated with a loss of approximately 10-20 potential years of life. The mortality gap between populations with bipolar disorders and the general population is principally a result of excess deaths from cardiovascular disease and suicide. Bipolar disorder has a high heritability (approximately 70%). Bipolar disorders share genetic risk alleles with other mental and medical disorders. Bipolar I has a closer genetic association with schizophrenia relative to bipolar II, which has a closer genetic association with major depressive disorder. Although the pathogenesis of bipolar disorders is unknown, implicated processes include disturbances in neuronal-glial plasticity, monoaminergic signalling, inflammatory homoeostasis, cellular metabolic pathways, and mitochondrial function. The high prevalence of childhood maltreatment in people with bipolar disorders and the association between childhood maltreatment and a more complex presentation of bipolar disorder (eg, one including suicidality) highlight the role of adverse environmental exposures on the presentation of bipolar disorders. Although mania defines bipolar I disorder, depressive episodes and symptoms dominate the longitudinal course of, and disproportionately account for morbidity and mortality in, bipolar disorders. Lithium is the gold standard mood-stabilising agent for the treatment of people with bipolar disorders, and has antimanic, antidepressant, and anti-suicide effects. Although antipsychotics are effective in treating mania, few antipsychotics have proven to be effective in bipolar depression. Divalproex and carbamazepine are effective in the treatment of acute mania and lamotrigine is effective at treating and preventing bipolar depression. Antidepressants are widely prescribed for bipolar disorders despite a paucity of compelling evidence for their short-term or long-term efficacy. Moreover, antidepressant prescription in bipolar disorder is associated, in many cases, with mood destabilisation, especially during maintenance treatment. Unfortunately, effective pharmacological treatments for bipolar disorders are not universally available, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. Targeting medical and psychiatric comorbidity, integrating adjunctive psychosocial treatments, and involving caregivers have been shown to improve health outcomes for people with bipolar disorders. The aim of this Seminar, which is intended mainly for primary care physicians, is to provide an overview of diagnostic, pathogenetic, and treatment considerations in bipolar disorders. Towards the foregoing aim, we review and synthesise evidence on the epidemiology, mechanisms, screening, and treatment of bipolar disorders.

Brexpiprazole in the treatment of schizophrenia and agitation in Alzheimer's disease

Schizophrenia is a disabling psychiatric disorder marked by progressive loss of functionality in activities of daily living with each relapse. Antipsychotics, the mainstay of therapy for schizophrenia, treat hallucinations and delusions but may have intolerable side effects, including metabolic disturbances and extrapyramidal symptoms. Brexpiprazole, a second-generation antipsychotic with dopamine partial agonist properties, was approved by the US FDA in 2015 for the treatment of schizophrenia and adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder and by the EU in 2018 for adults with schizophrenia. Additionally, brexpiprazole has recently been studied for the treatment of agitation in Alzheimer's dementia, an area of largely unmet need. Overall, well-tolerated brexpiprazole expands the armamentarium of treatment options available for these conditions.

Iron homeostasis alterations and risk for akathisia in patients treated with antipsychotics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Iron homeostasis may be implicated in the pathophysiology of antipsychotic-related akathisia. We performed a systematic review in six databases from database inception until 03/2020, conducting a meta-analysis of studies investigating iron metabolism in antipsychotic-treated patients with versus without akathisia. Using a fixed- and a random-effects model, standardized mean difference (SMD) was estimated for levels of iron, ferritin, transferrin and total iron-binding capacity. Meta-regression analyses included sex, age, illness duration and antipsychotic treatment and dose. Subgroup analyses included chronic vs. acute akathisia and different diagnoses. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. In 10 studies (n = 395), compared to non-akathisia patients (n = 213), iron levels were lower in patients with akathisia (n = 182; fixed-effect model: SMD=-0.49, 95%CI=-0.28,-0.70, p<0.001; random-effects model: SMD=-0.55, 95%CI=-0.14,-0.96, p = 0.008). For secondary outcomes, differences were significant regarding lower ferritin levels in patients with akathisia in the fixed-effect model (SMD=-0.32, 95%CI=-0.08,-0.55, p = 0.007), but not in the random-effects model (SMD=-0.29, 95%CI=0.20,-0.79, p = 0.24). None of the moderators/mediators had a significant effect on the group difference of iron levels. Subgroup analyses reported lower iron levels in both patients with chronic and acute akathisia vs. patients without. Iron levels for schizophrenia patients were lower in the fixed-effect model (SMD=-0.55, 95%CI=-0.23, -0.86, p<0.001), while a trend was observed in the random-effects model (SMD=-0.52, 95%CI=-0.07, -1.12, p = 0.08). The studies' quality was overall poor, with one exception. This meta-analysis suggests lower iron levels in akathisia patients, while ferritin differences were significant only in the fixed-effect model. Further data are required to promote the understanding of related pathways.

Dopamine-receptor blocking agent-associated akathisia: a summary of current understanding and proposal for a rational approach to treatment

Dopamine-receptor blocking agent-associated akathisia (DRBA-A) is an adverse effect that can significantly limit the use of these important medications for the treatment of a variety of psychiatric diseases, yet there is no unifying theory regarding its pathophysiology. This knowledge gap limits clinicians' ability to effectively manage DRBA-A and mitigate negative outcomes in an already vulnerable patient population. Based on a review of the current literature on the subject, it is hypothesized that dopaminergic and noradrenergic signaling is perturbed in DRBA-A. Accordingly, it is proposed that the optimal agent to manage this extrapyramidal symptom should increase dopamine signaling in the affected areas of the brain and counteract compensatory noradrenergic signaling via antagonism of adrenergic or serotonergic receptors.