Association of Statin Use with Increased Risk of Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The association between trajectory of serum cholesterol, statin dosage, and the risk of recurrent biliary stone diseases

BACKGROUND

Statins may reduce the risk of recurrent gallstone disease by decreasing bile cholesterol saturation and pathogenicity. However, limited studies have investigated this issue. This study aimed to assess whether statin doses and serum cholesterol levels were associated with a decreased risk of recurrent biliary stone diseases after the first event index, with a follow-up time of 15 years.

METHODS

Based on the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2020, we enrolled 68,384 patients with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision codes of choledocholithiasis. After exclusions, 32,696 patients were divided into non-statin (<28 cDDD, cumulative defined daily doses) (n = 27,929) and statin (≥28 cDDD) (n = 4767) user groups for analysis. Serum cholesterol trajectories were estimated using group-based trajectory modeling (n = 8410).

RESULTS

The statin users had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores than the non-statin users. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis showed that statin use >365 cDDD was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent biliary stones (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.28, 95% CI, 0.24-0.34; p < 00.0001), acute pancreatitis (aHR = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.17-0.32, p < 00.0001), and cholangitis (aHR = 0.28, 95% CI, 0.25-0.32, p < 00.0001). Cholecystectomy was also a protective factor for recurrent biliary stones (aHR = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.37-0.46; p < 00.0001). The higher trajectory serum cholesterol group (Group 3) had a lower risk trend for recurrent biliary stones (aHR = 0.79, p = 0.0700) and a lower risk of cholangitis (aHR = 0.79, p = 0.0071).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the potential benefits of statin use and the role of cholecystectomy in reducing the risk of recurrent biliary stone diseases.

Possible link between statin and iron deficiency anemia: A South Korean nationwide population-based cohort study

An extensive evaluation of disease occurrence after statin use based on a "hypothesis-free" approach remains scarce. To examine the effect of statin use on the potential risk of developing diseases, a propensity score-matched cohort study was executed using data from the National Sample Cohort in South Korea. A total of 7847 statin users and 39,235 nonstatin users were included in the final analysis. The period of statin use was defined as our main time-dependent exposure and was divided into three periods: current, recent, and past. The main outcomes were defined as new-onset diseases with ≥100 events based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. We calculated the adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Cox regression. We found that statin use significantly increased the risk of developing iron deficiency anemia up to 5.04 times (95% CI, 2.11 to 12.03). Therefore, the iron levels of patients using statins should be monitored carefully.

Statin use and MRI subchondral bone marrow lesion worsening in generalized osteoarthritis: longitudinal analysis from Osteoarthritis Initiative data

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between statin therapy and knee MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow lesion (BML) longitudinal worsening in patients with Heberden's nodes (HNs) as the hallmark of generalized osteoarthritis (OA) phenotype.

METHODS

All participants gave informed consent, and IRB approved HIPAA-compliant protocol. We assessed the worsening in BML volume and number of affected subregions in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) participants with HNs at baseline clinical examination (HN⁺), using the semi-quantitative MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Scores at baseline and 24 months. Participants were classified according to baseline BML involvement as "no/minimal" (≤ 2/14 knee subregions affected and maximum BML score ≤ 1) or "moderate/severe." Statin users and non-users were selected using 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matching for OA and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related potential confounding variables. We assessed the association between statin use and increasing BML score and affected subregions using adjusted mixed-effect regression models.

RESULTS

The PS-matched HN⁺ participants (63% female, aged 63.5 ± 8.5-year-old) with no/minimal and moderate/severe BML cohorts consisted of 332 (166:166, statin users: non-users) and 380 (190:190) knees, respectively. In the HN⁺ participants with no/minimal BML, statin use was associated with lower odds of both BML score worsening (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 0.62, 0.39-0.98) and increased number of affected subregions (0.54, 0.33-0.88). There was no such association in HN^- participants or those HN⁺ participants with baseline moderate/severe BML.

CONCLUSION

In patients with CVD indications for statin therapy and generalized OA phenotype (HN⁺), statin use may be protective against the OA-related subchondral bone damage only in the subgroup of participants with no/minimal baseline BML.

KEY POINTS

• Statin use may reduce the risk of subchondral bone damage in specific osteoarthritis patients with a generalized phenotype, minimal subchondral bone damage, and cardiovascular statin indications.

Effect of blood lipids and lipid-lowering therapies on osteoarthritis risk: A Mendelian randomization study

Background

We aimed to investigate the effects of blood lipids and lipid-lowering agents on osteoarthritis (OA) risk.

Materials and methods

We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to estimate the causal effect of blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) levels on knee and hip OA. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected from large genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of individuals of European ancestry as genetic instruments for blood lipid levels. The associations of selected genetic instruments with knee and hip OA were estimated in a recent GWAS of the UK Biobank and arcOGEN datasets. Univariate and multivariate MR analyses were performed to detect and adjust for potential pleiotropy. Furthermore, genetic instruments in HMGCR, NPC1L1, and PCSK9 regions were used to mimic LDL-C-lowering effects of statin, ezetimibe, and evolocumab, respectively.

Results

Genetically determined LDL-C increments led to reduced risks of both knee OA (OR = 0.91 per 1-SD increment, 95% CI: 0.86-0.95, P = 6.3 × 10^-5) and hip OA (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99, P = 0.027). Multivariate MR analysis proved that the effect was independent of HDL-C, TG, and body mass index. TG increment was associated with reduced risks of hip OA in the univariate MR analysis; however, this was not supported by the multivariate MR analysis. Genetically proxied LDL-C-lowering effects of statins are related to increased risks of knee OA but not hip OA.

Conclusions

The findings suggested that LDL-C increments have independent protective effects on both knee and hip OA. LDL-C-lowering effects of statins may increase the risk of knee OA.

Hyperlipidemia and Statin Use on the Progression of Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Osteoarthritis (OA) is progressive wear and tear disease that affects multiple joints, including knees, hips, and spine. OA causes structural damage to joints. Although hypertension, type II diabetes, and hyperlipidemia have a silent effect, for the most part, the addition of osteoarthritis has a limiting and debilitating impact on patients. Common symptoms of OA include joint pain, joint swelling, limitations in range of motion that is impacting one’s quality of life. The question being investigated in this systematic review is whether hyperlipidemia or the use of statin has any effect on osteoarthritis and progression of osteoarthritis. This systematic review of 13 articles was done to explore if there is an effect of hyperlipidemia and statin use on the progression of osteoarthritis. This study included 6,974,538 total participants. Eight studies out of the 13 investigated the effect of statin use. Out of the 13 articles, five studies investigated the impact of lipid levels on OA. The total participants cannot be divided into statin users and non-users because some studies did not divide the participants into two groups. Studies that investigated the effect of lipid levels on OA were studied based on age. Some included only women in their study, and one study was solely conducted in the military population. Therefore, these studies cannot be divided based on age. Further research is needed to significantly conclude either the positive or negative correlation of hyperlipidemia and statin use on osteoarthritis and its progression.

Association between statin use and incidence or progression of osteoarthritis: meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether statin use could reduce the risk of the incidence or progression of osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for observational studies on the association between statin use and OA. ORs and 95% CIs were directly retrieved or calculated. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale was used for study quality assessment. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were conducted using Stata software.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies (679807 participants) were identified from the systematic literature search. No significant association between statin use and incidence (OR = 1.010; 95% CI: 0.968 to 1.055; P = 0.638) or progression (OR = 1.076; 95% CI: 0.824 to 1.405; P = 0.589) of OA was found in our meta-analysis. The meta-analysis according to the symptomatic or radiological OA also found no significant association between statin use and OA. The subgroup analysis showed that atorvastatin (OR = 0.953; 95% CI: 0.911 to 0.998; P = 0.041) and rosuvastatin (OR = 1.180; 95% CI: 1.122 to 1.241; P < 0.0001) had opposite effects on OA. The results of the analysis according to the joint site, interval, and statin dose were all not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use may not be associated with a lower risk of incidence and progression of OA, regardless of joint site. The opposite effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were detected in OA.

Lipid-lowering Therapies in Myositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of lipid-lowering therapies in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) is complicated and there are no guidelines for diagnosing, monitoring, or treating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in this group of patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of lipid-lowering therapies, especially statins, is recommended in patients with increased risk for ASCVD, which includes patients with inflammatory diseases, based on recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for ASCVD management. There is accumulating evidence that patients with IIM are at increased risk for ASCVD, similar to other inflammatory diseases. Lipid-lowering therapies have side effects that may be pronounced or confounding in myositis patients, potentially limiting their use. Statins are specifically contraindicated in patients with anti 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) antibodies. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been shown to be safe and potentially beneficial in patients with IIM. Here, we propose a framework for (1) ASCVD risk assessment and treatment based on ACC/AHA ASCVD primary prevention guidelines; (2) myositis disease monitoring while undergoing lipid-lowering therapy; and (3) management of statin intolerance, including, indications for the use of PCSK9 inhibitors.

A Post Hoc Analysis of Statin Use in Tolvaptan Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Pivotal Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tolvaptan is approved to slow kidney function decline in adults with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) at risk of rapid progression. Because in vitro studies indicated that the tolvaptan oxobutyric acid metabolite inhibits organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1 and OATP1B3, United States prescribing information advises avoiding concurrent use with OATP1B1/1B3 substrates, including hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins). This post hoc analysis of the pivotal phase 3 tolvaptan trials (Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and Its Outcomes [TEMPO] 3:4 trial [NCT00428948] and Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: an Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in ADPKD [REPRISE] trial [NCT02160145]) examined the safety of concurrent tolvaptan/statin use.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The trials randomized a combined total of 2815 subjects with early- to late-stage ADPKD to tolvaptan (n=1644) or placebo (n=1171) for 3 years (TEMPO 3:4) and 1 year (REPRISE). Statin use was unrestricted, and 597 subjects (21.2% overall; 332 [20.2%] tolvaptan, 265 [22.6%] placebo) received statins. Statin use (duration, dose change, statin change, permanent discontinuation), incidences of statin-related adverse events, and hepatic transaminase elevations were determined for subjects who received tolvaptan+statin, placebo+statin, tolvaptan alone, and placebo alone.

RESULTS

No differences in statin use parameters between tolvaptan- and placebo-treated subjects were observed. No statistically significant increases in commonly reported statin-related adverse events (e.g., musculoskeletal disorders, gastrointestinal symptoms) were seen between subjects receiving tolvaptan+statin and placebo+statin. For example, in TEMPO 3:4, frequencies were 5.4% and 7.8%, respectively, for myalgia (difference -2.4%; 95% confidence interval, -11.2% to 6.4%) and 9.3% and 7.8%, respectively, for abdominal pain (difference 1.5%; -7.9% to 10.9%). In an analysis that excluded participants concurrently using allopurinol, the frequency of alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase >3× upper limit of normal in the pooled study populations was 3.6% for the tolvaptan+statin group and 2.3% for the placebo+statin group (difference 1.4%; -2.0% to 4.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Tolvaptan has been used safely in combination with statins in clinical trials.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_04_06_CJN.08170719.mp3.